Introduction. Ridge Road Transfer Station Ridge Road, Cleveland

Similar documents
GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

This is a draft revision of the briefing, and any comments are welcome please them to Becky Slater on

Westinghouse Plasma Gasification is the Next Generation of Energy from Waste Technology. USEA Annual Meeting May 30, 2013 Washington, DC

PLASMA GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR HAZADOUS WASTE. Waste2Tricity Internaltional (Thailand) Co., Ltd

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Welcome To Our Exhibition

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

Sustainable Development and Eco-friendly Waste Disposal Technology for the Local Community

SUSTAINABLE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

WASTE INCINERATION PLANTS IN AUSTRIA WITH DATA ON WASTE MANAGEMENT IN VIENNA

Facts on Open Burning Under Missouri Regulations

CITY OF HONOLULU REVIEW OF PLASMA ARC GASIFICATION AND VITRIFICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR WASTE DISPOSAL FINAL REPORT. Prepared by R. W. BECK, INC.

TECHNOLOGY. E-COMPANY Holding, s.e., Europe

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR

Waste to Energy WTERT, N.Y., October 2008

FROM WASTE TO ELECTRICITY. of Waste Management SOLUTION. Balboa Pacific Corporation "Advanced Thermal Conversion Technologies"

Article 1: Article 2:

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

CT Department of Environmental Protection. Getting SMART Waste Management to Reduce Disposal & Increase Recycling

Print. Turning waste into energy

WTD WASTE TO (BIO)DIESEL. A self-sustaining waste management system

Sustainable, Clean Energy from Waste

Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) As A Strategy For Zero Waste To Landfills. Gershman, Brickner & Bratton Inc. 1. Outline

Plastic to Fuel Technologies

Waste to Energy. Process Description. Transforming Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) into Affordable Electricity

Coke Manufacturing. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN SURABAYA. Solid Waste Management Seminar Kitakyushu, September 19-20, 2002

BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE PO BOX 88 Glendale Springs, North Carolina (336)

Zero emission Energy Recycling Oxidation System. June 2012

GBB Quality Value Ethics Results

Presented by: USA Biogas

Plastics Recycling. Datchanee Pattavarakorn Industrial Chemistry, Science, CMU

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY

City of Sydney Gasification Project

COMMISSIONING REPORT 2011

LEVENSEAT GASIFICATION PLANT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY

Topsoe s Emission Management Solution--DeNOx

APPROVAL FOR HAZARDOUS (BIOMEDICAL) WASTE INCINERATION PLANT FOR HOSPITALS

Sustainability and Environmental Issues in the Kraft Pulp Industry. Celso Foelkel

COGENERATION PLANT FAQ. What is biomass cogeneration? Cogeneration is the simultaneous production of electricity and heat using a single primary fuel.

Carpet Waste Gasification:

Westinghouse Plasma Gasification Industrial Scale Syngas Production from Waste Products

Technical Description Package Micro Auto Gasification System (MAGS )

An Overview of the SkyMine TM Process. David St. Angelo Vice President Skyonic Corporation Austin, Texas

RELEASE POINT TYPE Enter or select one of the following stack/emission point release orientation: downward

WASTE TO ENERGY. A Technical Review of Municipal Solid Waste Thermal Treatment Practices FINAL REPORT

ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL

Paper Mill Repowering with Gasification

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

What is the Real Story about Emerging Technologies? Materials Management as a Waste Management Strategy

Saving resources and protecting climate. The Greens in Germany

OF THE. October 2009

Government Decree on Waste Incineration (151/2013; amendments up to 1303/2015 included)

Technical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology

Controlling Emissions and Saving Money with Highly Engineered Cartridge Filter Technology

Ch Solid and Hazardous Waste

PSD Background Presentation

Driving Revenue Decreasing Profits. simplifying Energy Generation

Westinghouse Plasma Industrial / Commercial Scale Syngas Production from Waste. Power Gen Africa Cape Town, South Africa July 15-17, 2015

PROJECT UPDATES. Westinghouse Plasma Commercialized; Industrial Scale Syngas Production

Air Emissions Permitting Considerations for an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Unit Potentially Located in the State of Delaware

The Future of Solid Waste Management

Biomass Gasification

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MARATHON DANE COUNTY Branch

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Current Topics In Air Quality

Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants

W s a t s e t P o P wer Ge G nera r t a i t on (WPG) G T e T ch c n h ology

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Opportunities and Challenges Waste to Energy Industry

Output-Based Regulations: Best Practices Option for CHP. Neeharika Naik-Dhungel Program Manager, US EPA CHP Partnership July 13, 2011

9/20/2017 FROM TRASH TO GAS EQUALS CASH

WM2008 Conference, February 24-28, 2008, Phoenix, AZ Abstract #8216. Thermal Pretreatment For TRU Waste Sorting

Technology for. Management

ROCK CRUSHING PLANT APPLICATIONS ADVICE

MCAS Yuma 1 INTRODUCTION

FACT SHEET MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS

TITLE V OPERATING PERMIT STATEMENT OF BASIS

Energy Conversion Technologies for Biomass fuelled small-systems

Clean Air Act. Compliance

6. Good Practice Example: Biogas in Germany

M. T. I. Cabaraban & S. S. Paclijan Department of Chemical Engineering, Xavier University Ateneo de Cagayan, Philippines. Abstract

Product Data Sheet RESOPAL EXCELLENT

Printing Substrates: End of Life Options. Carolyn Burns Global Marketing Manager, DuPont Nonwovens

NEWMOA & NERC Joint Strategic Action Plan Working Together on Sustainable Materials Management

WASTE TO ENERGY (W2E) AS THE MODERN CONCEPT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT

Assessment of Alternative Waste Management Technologies

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

Whiting Business Unit

Transcription:

1

Agenda Page Introduction 3 1. Gasification Technology 12 2. System Requirements And Facility Design 16 3. Environmental Impacts 24 4. Sustainability 35 5. Economic Development 39 6. Summary of Development Process and Cost 43 7. Visual Impact 46 8. Q&A 55 2

Introduction Ridge Road Transfer Station 3741 Ridge Road, Cleveland 3

Ridge Road Transfer Station Aerial View 4

Current MSW Capacity and Collection at Ridge Road Cleveland s Ridge Road Transfer Station has a daily MSW capacity of 3,000 tons (253 days of operation) Ridge Road Transfer Station daily collection of MSW On-peak 1,500 tons daily Off-peak 900 tons daily Ridge Road unused capacity On-peak 1,500 tons daily Off-peak 2,100 tons daily 5

US EPA 2009* What Is In Municipal Solid Waste? Glass 4.8% Other 3.5% Rubbers, Leather, & Textiles 8.3% Metals 8.6% Wood 6.5% Plastics 12.3% 1 Paper and Paperboard 28.2% 2 3 4 5 6 7 Yard Trimming 13.7% Food Scraps 14.1% 8 9 *243 Million Tons (before recycling) 6

A New Way To Think About Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) We think of MSW as a valuable resource that can be processed, recycled and reused in new forms. This resource will take careful planning and investment to extract but the end result is new jobs, tax revenues, an environmentally friendly alternative energy source, and increased control of Cleveland s energy future. 7

Long Term Waste Management Solution Alternate Collection Method: convert the current manual process to a fully-automated and a semiautomated system for recycling utilizing carts. Waste Sorting & Separation: invest in material recovery facility to prepare waste for processing and/or recycling. Recyclables: fully implement Cleveland s s Waste Collection Recycling Program City-wide and include metal collection and separation, waste paper collection and bundling and more. Power Production: use MSW as feedstock for electric generation. 8

Why This Option for Cleveland Unlike other municipalities, Cleveland is unique in that it: Owns the MSW Has a high volume and variety of MSW Owns the transfer station Has its own electric system with direct access to the electric grid Manages its own Water System Rail is proximate to Transfer Station 9

Why This Option for Cleveland Local Power Production CPP purchases 99.9% of its power. Local generation would reduce dependence on the transmission grid. Facility Electricity Production: 20MW. Add Renewable energy sources 10

Why This Option for Cleveland Traditional fuel types available in other parts of the State/Country are not available in a non-attainment area like Cleveland Non-attainment means a geographic area in which the level of certain air pollutants is higher than national air quality standards Cleveland must find green/renewable/advanced energy options if it is to generate power locally Cleveland can be positioned as a national leader in MSWE technology, paving the way for manufacturing opportunities and more jobs to be created in Cleveland. 11

1. Gasification Technology The Concept and Technology is Not New The first waste-to-energy plant in the US was an incineration plant located in Saugus, Massachusetts. Today, incineration is recognized as a practical method for disposing of certain hazardous waste materials, but some consider it a more controversial method of waste disposal due to issues such as emission of harmful gaseous pollutants. Cleveland s waste-to-energy approach is not based on incineration but on a proven process called gasification. Three primary types of thermal gasification: Conventional gasification Plasma gasification Pyrolysis gasification 12

Gasification Technology Cleveland s MSW to Energy Facility will use a variation of conventional gasification rather than incineration. Incineration vs. Thermal Gasification Incineration of MSW is through combustion of organic materials in an oxygen rich environment that produces complex hazardous oxides in the process Thermal gasification of MSW is through high temperature chemical conversion of organic materials into synthetic gas (composed primarily of H 2 and CO) in a controlled oxygen and heat environment Thermal gasification breaks down hazardous organic substances such as dioxins and furans 13

Gasification Technology Gasification Process: The System is ignited at 80 C and rapidly increased to 800 C. Through precision temperature and air flow control, the system restrains formation of toxins. 8-12 hr process. 5 4 1 After gasification, ash remains are reduced to 5% of initial input volume. Enhanced furnace can reduce ash to 1-2%. Ash discharges are 99% nonorganic and non-toxic. This silicon can be sold or used. 1. Gasification Processing Chamber 2. Heating Chamber 3. Fluidization Chamber 4. Heat Transfer Chamber 5. Gasification Chamber 14

Gasification Technology The outcome of the gasification process is the production of a synthetic gas called syngas. Syngas is combustible and can be used as a fuel much like natural gas. Cleveland s MSWE facility will use syngas to fire a boiler. The boiler will produce steam that will turn a steam turbine generator to produce electricity. 15

2. System Requirements And Facility Design Top Priorities Minimize MSW sent to landfill Environmentally conscious waste-to-energy facility Electric power generation to reduce market dependence Electric generation that helps meet the City s AEPS goals for CPP Recycling on a City-wide basis Sustainable System 16

Facility Block Diagram Collection Recyclables Recycle Transfer Station Sorting & Separation Residual MSW* MSW Clean Gasification Decorative Bricks Steam Compression Hot Water Steam Electricity Fuel Pellets Future Opportunity Construction Debris Recycle Shredded Material *Some MSW will go to Landfill Landfill 17

Collection Process Current manual collection process replaced City-wide Recycling Program Semi and Fully-automated Collection Process City-wide 18

Collection and Sorting Processes Curbside Collection Collect and Transport Transfer Station Automated Sorting Manual Separation Recycling Feedstock for Gasification Processing 19

MSW Reuse Process MSW and Debris Sorting Shredding Fuel Pellets Feedstock In Steam Syngas out Boiler Gasification System 20

Gasification System Operation The Cleveland facility will have four gasification lines with two batch gasifiers operating in tandem in each gasification line. Max Operating schedule: 12 hours per day per gasifier (365 days per year) Feedstock: 70 tons of MSW/batch. Cycle: One batch of MSW will be processed each day in each gasifier. 21

Steam Uses Boiler Turbine Generator Electricity Steam used for fuel pellet production 22

Steam Compression Technology Shredded Feedstock In Special Loading Airlock Exterior Insulated Casing Conveyor progressing feedstock through steam drying process Typical Unit Size: 80 ft. long X 14 ft. wide Special Discharge Airlock Processed fuel out 23

3. Environmental Impacts Best Available Technology (BAT) The National Source Performance Standards (NSPS) subpart AAAA applies to small municipal waste combustion units for which construction occurred after August 30, 1999. The NSPS subpart Eb applies to new source performance standards for large municipal waste combustors constructed after September 20, 1994. Cleveland s facility as proposed will emit pollutants at or below all of these levels. The BAT limits proposed for the CPP project are equivalent to, or more stringent than, each of the relevant benchmarks. 24

Air Quality Modeling Ohio EPA required that an air quality computer model analysis be performed on the proposed Cleveland facility. The model completed by GT Environmental predicted how different air pollutants travel away from the source of pollution. Based on the modeling analysis, the predicted maximum off-site air quality impact for each pollutant emitted by the operation of the proposed CPP facility is well within the guidelines established by Ohio EPA 25

Environmental Impacts Although air quality modeling is not required pursuant to Ohio EPA Engineering Guide #69 for mercury or dioxin, CPP elected to include modeling for those two pollutants to demonstrate the impact from the proposed facility is far less than authorized by the Ohio EPA Air Toxic Policy Option A. 26

The Cleveland facility will operate within the OEPA NSR and HAPs guidelines Ohio EPA New Source Review (NSR) Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Particulate Matter (PM10) Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Carbon Monoxide (CO) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Lead (Pb) Ohio EPA Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Hydrogen Chloride (HCI) Dioxin Cadmium Mercury Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4) Ammonia 27

CPP BAT Emissions vs. Benchmark Rules and Permit mg/m³ 24 Particulate Matter 23 22 21 20 Particulate 19 18 NSPS Eb NSPS AAAA OEPA Mahoning Proposed CPP 28

CPP BAT Emissions vs. Benchmark Rules and Permit 30 25 20 Sulfur Dioxide 15 10 Sulfur Dioxide 5 0 NSPS Eb NSPS AAAA OEPA Mahoning Proposed CPP 29

CPP BAT Emissions vs. Benchmark Rules and Permit Nitrogen Oxide 160 140 120 100 80 60 Nitrogen Oxide 40 20 0 NSPS Eb NSPS AAAA OEPA Mahoning Proposed CPP 30

CPP BAT Emissions vs. Benchmark Rules and Permit 25 20 15 Hydrogen Chloride 10 Hydrogen Chloride 5 0 NSPS Eb NSPS AAAA OEPA Mahoning Proposed CPP 31

CPP BAT Emissions vs. Benchmark Rules and Permit Mercury 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 NSPS Eb NSPS AAAA OEPA Mahoning Proposed CPP Mercury 32

Sight, Smell and Noise Sample Technology Gasification- Processes MSW with high temperatures in separate stages and restrains the formation of toxic substances (Dioxin, CO, NOx, Sox). Removes more than 97% of airborne odor Primarily water vapor emissions (no black/gray smoke) No increased or high volume noise effects Used abroad in residential areas The facility will be enclosed and will have even less odor than the current operation 33

Impact on Truck Traffic At the current level, approximately 240 various types of trucks go in and out of the transfer station each day. (Some trucks make two or more trips, which are included in these numbers). A higher usage level, 2,000 and 3,000 tons per day, would result in 370 to 550 trucks per day. Other communities most communities collect their waste at the same time (between 6 a.m. to 5 p.m.). We will retain the flexibility to accept waste per our requirements. Just like the current operation, MSW received will be processed each day. 34

4. Sustainability 35

Sustainability Cleveland s Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard ( AEPS ) Cleveland Public Power will produce and/or purchase generation from Advanced Energy Sources to meet the following goals and time lines: AEP Target Year 15% 2015 20% 2020 25% 2025 36

Sustainability Health & Environment Land: Reduced land area used for MSW landfills No mining is involved in resource extraction of fuel source for energy production Air: Will not add to City s regulated emission problem Fuel pellets can be used to reduce local emission generators air pollution Energy resource has a lower carbon footprint Reduced carbon footprint and air pollution from waste hauling to landfills. > 40 miles each way! 37

Sustainability Waste Reduction & Recycling Increases recycling rate The addition of an onsite-sorting will greatly increase material diversion rate Allows for faster deployment of curbside recycling The curbside recycling and automated pick-up is saving the city money and significantly increasing the recycling rate For every ton of waste diverted from the landfill, the City of Cleveland saves over $40.00. With over 150,000 tons going to the landfill, this represents $6 million we no longer dump in a landfill. 38

5. Economic Development Advanced Energy can be one basis of the region s economic turnaround as new industries in the region develop new products and services and bring more jobs to the area. If the desire is to attract new technologies and businesses to the region, Cleveland s MSW to Energy facility could serve as the foundation upon which we build: To nurture the growth of the advanced technology industry To facilitate the business development of local corporations To propel Cleveland and the Region to the front of the international stage of advanced energy technology development 39

Jobs Per Component MSW to Energy facility operation 24/7 in 3 shifts Full time staffing needs Collection Process: N/A Waste Sorting: 24-36 Waste Processing: 12-18 Steam Compression: 18-24 Gasification Operation: 18-24 Power Plant Operation: 18-24 Total Direct Jobs: 90-126 40

Manufacturing Facilities Economic Development Components of Cleveland s systems could be assembled, and some manufactured, locally Sorting Systems (manual and/or automatic) Gasification Facility Steam Compression System This would mean more jobs and demand as Cleveland s model is duplicated nationally 41

Regional Impact Participating Municipalities will: Pay lower tipping fees and save money Experience lower MSW transportation cost since their MSW will not be trucked to a landfill Reduce carbon emissions caused by trucking MSW long distances to landfills 42

6. Summary of Development Process and Cost Cleveland s MSWE development process outline Feasibility Study Consultants: RNR Consulting, URS Corporation, DLZ Ohio, Inc., Cloud & Associates Contributors: AMP Ohio, APPA, Cleveland Foundation and Cleveland Public Power Visit to see technology in Japan and China August and December 2009 Waste Composition Studies Consultants: SCS Engineers Contributors: Cleveland Public Power 43

Summary of Development Process and Cost Facility Design Agreement Consultants: Princeton Environmental Group, subs include Kinsei Sangyo Co. LTD., GT Environmental, Ralph Tyler Companies, and PFK Associates Contributors: AMP Ohio, APPA, Cleveland Foundation and Cleveland Public Power Air Permit Application Preliminary Facility Design 44

Summary of Facility Cost Estimated Facility Cost: City-Wide Recycling (equipment & vehicles) $29 million MSW Receiving Station $21 million Recycling Station $12 million Gasification Equipment $21 million Power Plant (20 MW) $15 million Steam Compression Equipment $45 million Construction $21 million Civil Engineering* $ 8 million Decorative Brick Equipment $ 8 million ---------------- Total Estimated Cost $180 million *Cost of Facility Design: $1.5 million 45

7. Visual Impact Ridge Road Transfer Station Existing Layout Aerial View 46

Conceptual Layout 1 Everything is enclosed 47

Conceptual Layout 2 48

Ridge Road Transfer Station View 49

Ridge Road Transfer Station View After Everything is enclosed 50

Huntington Beach, CA Material Recovery Facility 51

The signs are the only indication 52

Across the street is a school 53

and playground 54

Q&A Questions? 55