ARKANSAS. Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan. LRITP Stakeholder Meetings. June 27-30, 2016

Similar documents
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Annual Transportation Performance Report 2012

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Chapter 1 Introduction

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

ODOT Asset Management Plan 0

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

The Economic Return on Transportation Investments

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

Chapter 2 Performance Measures

A long-term, comprehensive solution

Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015

Texas Urban Mobility Plan: Breaking the Gridlock

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

Integrating High Speed Rail, Regional Rail, and Transit Services in California

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

Twin Cities Regional Truck Corridors Study. MnDOT Metro Freight Studies Roundup

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Capital Beltway in Northern Virginia, USA

Appendix. B RTP Checklist REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING EDITION

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Strategic Plan Updates

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Justification Review. Public Transportation Program. Florida Department of Transportation

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

New Jersey Pilot Study

Introduction. Background

PERSPECTIVES ON THE FAST ACT

IOWA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

PROVIDING SAFE AND EFFICIENT MOBILITY IN HAWAII: The Cost to Drivers of Deficient Roads, Highway Congestion and Traffic Crashes

AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY OF KANE

USING REMAINING SERVICE LIFE AS THE NATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURE OF PAVEMENT ASSETS

LOUISIANA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Niagara Region Transportation Master Plan Niagara-Hamilton Trade Corridor Technical Paper

CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Functional Classification Comprehensive Guide. Prepared by

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

Utah s Most Critical Surface Transportation Projects to Support Economic Growth and Quality of Life. March Washington, DC

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

I-10 Master Plan Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties TPO Meetings. Tier II June 11 th & 13 th, 2012

Business Plan for FY14 FY15

May 20, 2015 Russ Dudley VDOT - Local Assistance Division. May 20, 2015 Todd Halacy VDOT - Local Assistance Division

Published by the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in coordination with Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Envisioning the Future: A History of Regional Planning Initiatives, Studies, and Plans

OKLAHOMA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

California State Rail Plan. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission November 2, 2017

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

TRANSPORTATION POLICY, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND SUSTAINABILITY: Looking Back, Looking Forward

2009 through Texas Department of Transportation

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

Chapter 1: The 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 1. Challenges & Opportunities 2 VTrans2035: The Precursor 2 The VSTP and VTrans2035 2

AREAWIDE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

transportation BUSINESS PLAN

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

Access Management and Public Involvement: Lessons Learned the Hard Way in Utah

I know that you all understand the critical importance of the freight transportation system

A THRIVING MIDDLE GEORGIA

Performance Based Practical Design. An FHWA Perspective

DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 1290 BROADWAY, SUITE 100 DENVER, CO

Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study

Project Evaluation Criteria

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Toward More Sustainable Infrastructure: Project Evaluation for Planners and Engineers. Los Angeles, CA

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

Annual CSAH Needs Update for 2017

PLAN 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Final Recommendations. Transportation and Air Quality Committee March 13, 2014

A Contractor s Look at the Changing World of Asphalt Technology

REGIONAL SOLICITATION ROADWAY APPLICATIONS: POTENTIAL CHANGES. TAB September 20, 2017

Coulter Transportation Consulting, LLC 1524 Paula Avenue Wheaton, IL Ph:

The New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM

Loudoun County Chamber of Commerce

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

National Performance Research Data Set (NPMRDS): Travel Time Probe Data. Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission

Public-Private-Partnerships

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

Transcription:

ARKANSAS Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan LRITP Stakeholder Meetings June 27-30, 2016

Agenda Overview of 2040 LRITP Highway Needs Non-Highway Needs Revenue Forecast Funding Gap Alternative Future Scenarios Performance Results MetroQuest Demonstration Next Steps Interactive Session Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 2

Safety and Security Economic Competitiveness Infrastructure Condition Environmental Sustainability Congestion Reduction, Mobility and System Reliability Multimodal Transportation System Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 3

Transportation System Support Highway Bridge Highway Needs Assessment (2016-2040) Category Estimated Multimodal Needs (millions $) Annual Need (millions $) Rehabilitation $2,804.52 $112.18 Reconstruction $150.38 $6.02 Replacement $1,978.10 $79.12 Total Bridge $4,933.00 $197.32 Preservation $8,734.97 $349.40 Reconstruction $18,231.56 $729.26 Expansion $3,044.00 $121.76 I-49 and I-69 Corridors $5,644.00 $225.76 Four-Lane Grid System $5,886.00 $235.44 Total Highway $41,540.53 $1,661.62 Interchanges $820.00 $32.80 Safety $1,750.00 $70.00 Maintenance $4,540.49 $181.62 ITS $88.00 $3.52 Total System Support $6,378.49 $255.14 TOTAL $53,672.01 $2,146.88 Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 4

Public Transportation Non-Highway Needs (2016-2040) Category Estimated Multimodal Needs (millions $) Annual Need (million $) Rural Transit $4,236.61 $169.46 Urban Transit $726.95 $29.08 Other $723.42 $28.94 Total Public Transportation $5,686.98 $227.48 Rail Facility $1,722.48 $68.90 Ports and Waterways $743.46 $29.74 Bicycle and Pedestrian $1,001.80 $40.07 TOTAL $9,154.72 $366.19 Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 5

Baseline Revenue Forecast (2016-2040) The baseline revenue forecast assumes: No changes to state or federal legislation which stipulate the amount of revenues AHTD receives. No changes in tax rates, fee levels, or existing revenues. No new revenue sources. No proceeds from newly issued debt, general revenue appropriations from the State, or other special one-time funding. 2.5 percent annual inflation factor 25-Year total revenue = $15.4 billion (CY$) 25-Year inflation adjusted revenue = $11.0 billion (2014$) This forecast does not include the recent Arkansas Highway Improvement Plan of 2016 revenue Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 6

Baseline Revenue Forecast (2016-2040) $15.4 billion in current year dollars equates to......$11.0 billion in inflation adjusted dollars (a 28 percent loss in purchasing power) Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 7

Highway Funding Gap Needs $53.7 Billion Revenue $10.5 B Highway Funding Gap = $43.2 Billion Annual Highway Funding Gap = $1.7 Billion $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 8

Alternative Future Scenarios Portray different scenarios to allocate resources Scenarios combine essential elements Goals & objectives, needs, funding, and priorities Develop framework Develop menu of strategic choices Test different resource allocation emphasis Portray alternatives and explain outcomes Understand consequences and trade-offs Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 9

Keep it Smooth Preserve the Investment Focus Maintain and preserve the existing highway and bridge system Higher priority on highway and bridges on the National Highway System (NHS) Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 10

Think Locally Trade Globally Focus Enhance infrastructure investments that support industry retention and attraction Allocate funds to increase capacity and improve system conditions on key corridors to improve freight efficiency and connectivity Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 11

Connecting Communities Forging Opportunities Focus Increase capacity to improve economic competitiveness. Allocate funds to complete the Four-Lane Grid System. Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 12

Bigger Cities More Mobility Focus Allocate funds to alleviate urban congestion Emphasis on: Congested corridors Increasing transit operations Preserving the existing urban system Addressing gaps in the bicycle and pedestrian network Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 13

2040 Pavement Pavement Performance Annual Needs = $10.8B Peak Optimal Current Condition = 67.8% Moderate Keep it Smooth = $355M Think Locally = $300M Connecting Communities = $250M Bigger Cities = $252.7M 14

Bridge Performance Annual Needs = $197.32M Keep it Smooth = $95M Think Locally = $55M Connecting Communities = $45M Bigger Cities = $55M Moderate Current Condition = 5.04% Optimal Peak Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 15

Smart Transportation (ITS) Performance Annual Needs = $3.52M Peak Optimal Moderate Current Spend = $2.7M Keep it Smooth = $2.7M Think Locally = $7.7M Connecting Communities = $7.7M Bigger Cities = $7.7M Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 16

Maintenance Performance Annual Needs = $181.62M Peak Optimal Moderate Current Spend = $93M Keep it Smooth = $93M Think Locally = $93M Connecting Communities = $93M Bigger Cities = $93M Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 17

Safety Performance Annual Needs = $70M Current Spend = $35M Peak Optimal Moderate Keep it Smooth = $35M Think Locally = $35M Connecting Communities = $35M Bigger Cities = $35M Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 18

Public Transportation Performance Annual Needs = $29.08M Peak Current Spend = $4M Optimal Moderate Keep it Smooth = $9M Think Locally = $11.7M Connecting Communities = $11.7M Bigger Cities = $80.02M Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 19

Bicycle & Pedestrian Performance Annual Needs = $40.07M Peak Current Spend = $1M Optimal Moderate Keep it Smooth = $1M Think Locally = $1M Connecting Communities = $1M Bigger Cities = $10M Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 20

Avg. Freeway Speed (mph) % Safety Needs % Good NHS Miles % Poor NHS Deck Area What if? Analysis Pavement Budget = $600.72M Bridge 70.3 5.5 Capacity Safety 54.9 95 Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 21

Avg. Freeway Speed (mph) % Safety Needs % Good NHS Miles % Poor NHS Deck Area What if? Budget Reduction Budget = $600.72M -$100.00M $500.72M Pavement Bridge 70.3 (Maintain Performance) 9.3 (+3.8) Capacity Safety 60 (-35) 53.2 (-2.7) Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 22

Avg. Freeway Speed (mph) % Safety Needs % Good NHS Miles % Poor NHS Deck Area What if? Budget Increase Budget = $600.72M +$100.00M $700.72M Pavement Bridge 70.3 (Maintain Performance) 3.9 (-1.6) Capacity Safety 100 (+5) 54.9 (Maintain Performance) Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 23

Avg. Freeway Speed (mph) % Safety Needs % Good NHS Miles % Poor NHS Deck Area What if? Wanted Peak Pavement Budget = $600.72M +$539.30M Min Required = $1140.72M Bridge 90 (+19.7) 10 (+3.5) Capacity Safety 55 (+0.1) 60 (-35) Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 24

MetroQuest Live Demonstration www.wemovearkansas.com/metroquest.html Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 25

Takeaways Links resource allocation to system performance Informs leadership on critical decision points Helps establish realistic priorities under current funding Provides guidance on setting reasonable targets AHTD needs more funding to Maintain infrastructure conditions Improve economic competiveness Connect communities Invest in non-highway improvements Clarifies AHTD s difficulty in meeting statewide expectations of stakeholders and general public Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 26

Next Steps June-August Use MetroQuest to engage statewide stakeholder input on priorities, alternative future scenarios, and funding levels Complete draft LRITP AHTD internal review TPAG meeting #3 September Finalize LRITP 30-day public comment period October-November Website and video Present to Commission to approve LRITP Arkansas Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan 27

INTERACTIVE SESSION

Questions Long Range Intermodal Transportation Plan Project Website http://www.wemovearkansas.com Project Email AR_LRITP@ahtd.ar.gov Project Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/arlritp2040/ LRITP Stakeholder Meetings June 27-30, 2016