Using Biomass to Supplement Natural Gas for Hydronic Heating in a Greenhouse Complex

Similar documents
Biomass Fuel Project. sustainability.uiowa.edu/biomass

Using Biomass in Minnesota

GCE Environmental Technology. Energy from Biomass. For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2014

Haines Borough Wood Heat Feasibility Study

Central Heating Plants EU 311

Biomass Heating Feasibility Guide

Tough on Winter, Easy on You

Biomass Design & Potential

6. Good Practice Example: Biogas in Germany

Biomass Production or Collection

Carbon Footprint Analysis. UIUC Facilities and Services

Life cycle analysis of thermosyphon solar water heaters

Retrofit of Rodenhuize 4 power station: The Max Green and Cold Back-up-projects

SUSTAINABLE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

REYHER FARM. Diverse Agricultural Business Located In Southeast Colorado For Sale. 7,000+/- ACRES OFFERED AT $19,500,000

Welcome to Biomass Heating Systems Presented by Andreas Wintzer. Viessmann Werke

ENERGY AUDIT. 123 Main Street Mississauga, Ontario. January 1, Report To: Mr. John Smith Smith Printing Company.

Project Report: SunMaxx Commercial Case Studies

Renewable Energy for Indoor Agriculture

Covered Commodities. Pulse Crops

The Biomass Option. Types of Biomass. Pellets market and products. Summary and Conclusions

BIOMASS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CATSKILLS

CONVERSION FROM COAL TO WOOD PELLETS BY PREBEN MESSERSCHMIDT PROJECT DIRECTOR

In Defense of Better Balance Between Centralized and Decentralized Wood Fuel Distribution Channels

Shredders for Pallet Recycling

Sustaining Our Operation in a Changing World. Michael Younis October

Condenser Water Heat Recovery"

Florida Nursery and Landscape Industry Outlook for 2013

REHABILITATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MIXING SYSTEMS

Feasibility assessment of geothermal pellet production from agricultural residues in medium-sized municipality in north Greece

Texas Hospital. Central Plant Redesign. Central Utility Plant SECOND PLACE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, EXISTING 2013 ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES

Chilled Water Plant Redesign

Heating school buildings with wood chips Motivators and Lessons Learned Diana Reaume, QVSD Superintendent Bill Henderson, QVSD Maintenance Supervisor

HEat PumP technology FoR underfloor HEatINg comfortheat.com.au

1 st Renewable Energy Technologies, LP. Organic Rankine Cycle

CHP Case Studies. Midwest CHP Application Center (MAC) .org (312) University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center UIC

USFS Juneau Ranger District & Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center Biomass Pre- feasibility Report

A Small Scale Anaerobic Digester Operating in Ontario - Klaesi Brothers Farm

Small Scale CHP Using the Organic Rankine Cycle

Biogas Opportunities: From Fuel to Flame

NSF International Evaluation of Westervelt Renewable Energy, LLC Compliance with the SBP Framework: Public Summary Report

How Are Alberta s Largest Manufacturing Sectors Faring in the Current Recession?

a comparative study of secondary glycol and direct expansion refrigeration systems

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

Reliant on fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas)

2008 New England Kiln Drying Association

Energy Principles. AJ A.J. Both Dept. of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University


OPERATING INPUTS Units Price Quantity $/Acre Wheat Seed Bu./acre $ $ Custom Harvest Acre $ -

COAL WATER SLURRY FUEL Alternate Fuel for Thailand

GlenWyvis renewable heat assessment. 27 th September 2015

Heating with Wood: Vermont s Renewable Resource

Pre-Assessment Data. Have there been any major changes to equipment or processes in the past year?

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

GEO-HEAT CENTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Renewable Fuel Standard

Combined Heat & Power (CHP) in New Jersey

Reducing the High Cost of Alaska s Rural Water Systems. Eric Hanssen, P.E., LEED AP Senior Energy Project Manager ANTHC Rural Energy Ini?a?

Ore-Based Metallics: adding value to the EAF SEASI CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION. MAY 2017

Green Fuel Nordic The Smart Way. Utilising RTP TM technology to produce sustainable 2 nd generation bio-oil from local feedstocks

Crop Production Costs

Advantages of Financing Continuous Commissioning As An Energy Conservation Retrofit Measure

CFB Combustion Control System for Multiple Fuels

Farm Energy Audit Report

Green Energy. as a Rural Economic Development Tool Project. District of Lillooet Biomass Heating System. case study COMMUNITY: PROJECT: NOTES:

Value of Air Source Heat Pumps in Light of Variable Energy Prices. Jeff Haase. Energy Design Conference February 27, 2013

Climate Action Planning at Rice University. Richard R. Johnson Admin. Center for Sustainability and Energy Management 27 April 2016

ASTEC Large Modular Wood Pellet Plants. Wood Pellet Plants

Ground-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage

Achieving a cost optimal balance between heat supply efficiency and moderation of demand

Prospectus: Biochar Production Unit

Torrefaction? What s that?

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Roundaway Plantation

Department of Natural Resources Forest Resource Management

Field Pea and Lentil Marketing Strategies

CONTEC SCREW CONVEYOR

Predictive Safety s Fatigue Management System: Benefits Realization Report

ECONOMIC IMPACT. In 2015, the ethanol industry contributed nearly $44 billion to the nation s GDP and added nearly $24 billion to household income.

Heating Buildings and Business Operations with Biomass Fuel: A Planning Guide

Implications of Measured Commercial Building Loads on Geothermal System Sizing

Sustainable Bioenergy Solutions from Viessmann

ISPE CASA Energy Management Forum - Energy Management of Capital Projects at Novartis

Research priorities for large scale heating and industrial processes

The Benefits of Renewable Energy From Biomass. Traxys Power Group, Inc.

EBB2 On Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Spanish Yellow Onions District II

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER ALLENTOWN, PA

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

Need for incorporating reliability and availability in payback calculations

Energy Analysis and Savings Opportunities For Habitat for Humanity 3 Bedroom Ranch House

Renewables. Vacuum Tube Solar Systems. Solar Energy to the Power of

Property Condition Assessment

BIOENERGY OPPORTUNITIES AT GAY & ROBINSON. E. Alan Kennett President, Gay & Robinson, Inc.

Small Oil-Less Centrifugal Compressors: Bringing Energy Efficiency and Reduced Costs to Chiller Plants

IAC/MHC EPC CORE COMPETENCIES PRESENTATION. Innovation. Service. Product Excellence.

Anaerobic Digestion. Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries. Presented To:

Annual Report. December 2010 November Bradley Cole 2/7/2012

Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Torrefaction to Improve Biomass for Energy and Biofuels Production and Carbon Sequestion. Chris Hopkins, Research Associate

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Transcription:

Using Biomass to Supplement Natural Gas for Hydronic Heating in a Greenhouse Complex Chad Wheeley, Mary C. Emplaincourt, and B.K. Hodge, Mississippi State University ABSTRACT In 2003, the Industrial Assessment Center at Mississippi State University performed an energy assessment for Natchez Trace Greenhouses. A recommendation made to the facility to reduce natural gas usage was to replace the existing natural gas boilers with bio-mass boilers that burn biomass fuels for use in a hydronic heating system. Burning wood shavings and/or other bio-mass fuels was recommended as a viable fuel alternative to offset the rising price of natural gas. Wood chips with an average energy cost of $1.64/ (from 2004-2007) are readily available from a local sawmill. Grain corn with an energy cost of $5.81. in 2003/2004 can be purchased locally. In 2003/2004, the facility was paying $5.78/ for natural gas and anticipated a significant increase in the price of natural gas. Partial implementation in 2004-2005 and rapidly escalating natural gas prices convinced the owner to supplement natural gas with wood shavings and corn to heat the greenhouses. Three new 40-hp fire-tube boilers were installed and existing 40-hp natural gas boiler was converted to burn biomass fuels. Based on the assessment, the facility was able to obtain loans from the State of Mississippi and the U. S. Department of Agriculture to implement the recommendation. During the winter of 2005-2006, the new fire-tube and the retrofitted boilers using biomass fuels were fully operational. Planer wood shavings, corn, and wood pellets are the fuels being considered for burning. Future fuel possibilities are briquettes made of cottonseed hulls. The proposed paper will analyze the fuel savings realized by the facility, the cost of implementation, the savings, the added maintenance and operating costs, and the effects of using biomass as fuel. Introduction During May 2003, the Mississippi State University Industrial Assessment Center (MSU IAC) performed an industrial energy assessment for Natchez Trace Greenhouses located in Kosciusko, Mississippi. One of the assessment recommendations implemented at the facility was to heat the greenhouses by replacing the existing natural gas boilers with fire-tube (fire-box) boilers that use bio-mass fuels such as wood shavings and corn to reduce natural gas consumption. The availability of corn, as well as, wood shavings from a local sawmill made the installation of bio-mass boilers economically attractive. However, the owner of the greenhouses is competing with a local paper mill for the wood shavings. 3-165

Company Profile Natchez Trace Greenhouses cultivates a variety of annual and perennial ornamental plants from seedlings that mature in greenhouses. The facility sits on 4 acres consisting of greenhouses totaling 230,062 square feet. The greenhouses are constructed with metal and wood frames. The coverings of the buildings include double polyethylene, corrugated plastic, and glass. Each greenhouse has different heating requirements depending on the type of plants in the greenhouse. In 2003 five natural gas boilers totaling 440 hp produced hot water that was circulated through fan coil units to heat the greenhouses. The boilers typically operate part of the month of September and all of the months of October through March and part of April. Implementation In 2003 the owner of the facility began installation of three new 40-hp bio-mass boilers and the retrofitting of a fourth natural gas boiler with the necessary equipment to burn bio-mass fuel. By December 2005, the retrofitting and installation process of the biomass system was completed. Figure 1 illustrates the layout of the greenhouses with the locations of the natural gas and bio-mass boilers and the areas they heat. Figure 2 is a photograph of a newly installed and operational 40-hp fire-tube boiler that is located outside the new boiler room. The installation and retrofitting of the bio-mass boilers from 2003 through 2005 reduced the consumption of natural gas used to heat the greenhouses. This proved to be timely, given the significant escalations in energy costs in Mississippi in 2005 due to Hurricane Katrina in August of 2005. Figure 3 depicts the cost to heat the greenhouses with natural gas during the heating months of September through April from 2001-2007. Figure 1. Heating Systems for the Greenhouses 3-166

Figure 2. A Newly Installed and Operational 40-HP Bio-Mass Boiler Figure 3. Costs of Natural Gas from 2001-2007 for Natchez Trace Greenhouses Costs of Natural Gas for Heating Seasons 2001-2007 for the Natchez Trace Greenhouses Natural Gas Contracted fom a Local Provider for the Heating Months from Sept. 2001- April 2007 and from the Open Spot Market for the Heating Months Sept. 2004- April 2007 $per MMBTU $20.00 $18.00 $16.00 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 Apr-01 Sep-02 Jan-04 May-05 Oct-06 Feb-08 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 Heating Months (September-April) Future plans are to retrofit the150-hp natural gas boiler with equipment to burn bio-mass. The two 125-hp natural gas boilers located in one of the greenhouses will continue to be fueled by natural gas. The three newly installed bio-mass boilers pre-heat the water, which then flows to the 125-hp natural gas boilers where it is heated to its operating temperature. 3-167

Fuel Used in the Bio-Mass Boilers The bio-mass boilers burn planer wood shavings and corn for fuel. Wood shavings are purchased and delivered in twenty-ton loads every three to four days from a local sawmill about 30 miles away, and corn is purchased and delivered in 2,500- bushel-loads as needed from a broker in the area. At the new boiler site, the bio-mass is stored under a covered area that can be seen in Figure 4. The bio-mass is conveyed into two storage tanks depicted in Figure 5. Each tank holds eight to ten tons. The wood shavings and corn are taken from the storage tanks, mixed in a bin, and carried by a screw conveyor into the bio-mass boilers. The fuel mixture contains approximately seventy percent wood shavings and thirty percent corn. The average moisture content of the wood shavings is seven percent. In 2003 the owner of the facility considered burning wood pellets at $6.25/ with a heating value of 8000 Btu/lb but the fuel was not commercially available geographically. The use of wood pellets will be reviewed at a later time. The owner of the greenhouses reduced the use of corn as a fuel in 2006 with the price of corn at $9.90 per exceeding the price of natural gas at $9.32 per. Future plans are to burn briquettes made of cotton seed hulls that have a Btu output equivalent to corn. Table 1 presents the cost of wood shavings, corn, and natural gas per and the cost of wood shavings per ton and corn per bushel for the years 2004-2007. From 2004 through 2007 wood shavings have averaged costing the owner $26/ton. In the past three years the owner paid the following for corn: $2.70/bushuel in 2004, $3.03/bushel in 2005, and $4.60/bushel in 2006. From 2004-2007, Natchez Trace Greenhouses burned bio-mass fuel along with natural gas to heat the greenhouses. Table 1. Costs of Wood, Corn and Natural Gas Wood Shavings *Average Cost of Wood per Corn *Average Cost of Corn per Natural Gas Average Cost of Natural Gas per (Purchased on the open spot market) 2004-2005 $1.56 $5.81 $7.46 2005-2006 $1.69 $6.52 $13.46 2006-2007 $1.69 $9.90 $10.41 *The heating values used to determine the cost per for wood shavings and corn are 8,000 Btu/lb and 8,300 Btu/lb, respectively. 3-168

Figure 4. Bio-Mass Storage Area Figure 5. Bio-Mass Storage Tanks Each of the 40-hp bio-mass boilers consumes approximately 220 lb of fuel per hour fully loaded. The typical hot water temperature output from the bio-mass boilers is 145 F. The biomass boilers run at atmospheric pressure with an efficiency of approximately seventy percent. Table 2 lists the amounts of wood shavings and corn purchased from 2004 through 2007. In the 2003-2004 heating season, all of the wood shavings and corn purchased were burned to heat the greenhouses. In the 2005-2006 season, two-thirds of the wood shavings and ninety-five percent of the corn purchased were burned. Table 3 shows the amount of bio-mass burned to supplement the facilities natural gas usage from 2004-2007. Table 2. Amounts of Bio-Mass Purchased Wood Shavings Corn s Purchased s Purchased 2004-2005 2,982 1,704 2005-2006 10,155 4,964 2006-2007 7,785 2,654 Table 3. Natural Gas and Bio-Mass Fuel Usage Natural Gas Wood Shavings Corn Usage Usage Usage Usage 2001-2002 21,558 N/A N/A 21,558 2002-2003 20,869 N/A N/A 20,869 2003-2004 18,565 N/A N/A 18,565 2004-2005 13,218 2982 1704 17,904 2005-2006 2,233 9,898 4790 16,821 2006-2007 9,662 7,785 2,654 20,101 3-169

Natchez Trace Greenhouses currently has 20.4 of boiler capacity. The bio-mass boilers account for 6.6 of the capacity that is used to pre-heat water. The remaining 13.8 of boiler capacity is accounted for by natural gas boilers, which are supplemented by the bio-mass boilers. In terms of meeting the Mississippi Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines, as long as the total facility boiler capacity burning bio-mass does not exceed 10 /hr, the facility does not need to apply for an environmental permit. Implementation Costs The facility was able to obtain loans of $135,000 from the Land, Waste, and Timber Board of the State of Mississippi, $40,000 from the United States Department of Agriculture, and $40,000 in kind for materials and parts was supplied by the facility. The industrial assessment performed by the Mississippi State University IAC aided the facility in obtaining the loans by defining the needs of the project and the cost to implement the new system as well as estimating the cost savings that could be obtained by the facility. The installation of the three new bio-mass boilers account for the largest percentage of the total implementation cost of the system. Figure 6 illustrates the new boiler area with the three newly installed bio-mass boilers. The bio-mass fuel, which is stored under a covered area, is transferred to two storage silos, one for corn and the other for wood shavings. Both bio-mass products are then mixed in the fuel mixer and transferred to the bio-mass boilers. When the system is first brought on line, the exit water has an average temperature of 80 F. However, after the system has been running for a few hours, the exit water has an average temperature of 120 F. The bio-mass boilers pre-heats the exit water to 145 F. If the nighttime temperature is above 45 F then the temperature of the water coming from the bio-mass boiler is sufficient to heat the greenhouses. If the nighttime temperature is below 45 F then the 145 F water from the bio-mass boilers is heated to 180 F by the two 125-hp natural gas boilers. Figure 6. Bio-Mass Heating Process Schematic 3-170

The actual implementation cost of the new system was approximately $215,000 for the purchase of three new bio-mass boilers, the retrofitting of one natural gas boiler, the material handling/storage equipment, water storage systems, pump/piping system (steel pipes), parts, and materials. The breakdown of the costs is in Table 4. Cost Savings Table 4. Implementation Costs Retrofit the 40-hp Boiler $5,000 Purchase of Three New Bio-Mass boilers $102,000 Material Handling/Storage Equipment, Water Storage Systems, and Pump/Piping Systems $68,000 In-Kind Material and Parts $40,000 Natchez Trace Greenhouses contracted natural gas from a local provider for the heating seasons 2001-2004. From 2004-2007 the facility purchased natural gas off the spot market. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina had a direct impact on the rise in price of natural gas. As a result, the facility paid double the previous year s average natural gas price to heat the greenhouses. In 2004 the facility began to use bio-mass to help heat the greenhouses in the first phase when two of the three bio-mass boilers were installed. Two additional bio-fuel boilers (a new one and a retrofitted one) were installed and operational by the 2005 heating season. When available, burning wood shavings for fuel is more economical for the facility than burning natural gas. However, the price of natural gas stabilized over the previous season and burning corn became less economical than natural gas. Table 5 gives a complete list of the seasonal fuel usages and corresponding fuel heating costs. Bio-mass fuel was used to supplement natural gas usage for the entire 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons. If natural gas alone had been used during 2005-2006 and 2006-2007, the cost to heat the facility would have been $213,145 and $168,280 respectively as shown in Table 6. However, the actual heating costs for 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons were $76,353 and $118,748 respectively. This resulted in a savings of $136,792 for the 2005-2006 season and $49,532 for the 2006-2007 season. Table 7 outlines the savings per year attained by burning biomass to reduce natural gas consumption. Maintenance and Emissions Maintenance issues for the boilers and the burning of the bio-mass fuel has not posed any real problems. However, vigilance is required when operating the bio-mass boilers. The Mississippi Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an opinion stating that as long as the total facility boiler capacity does not exceed 10 /hr, the facility does not need to apply for an environmental permit. EPA has confirmed that the new and retrofit fire-box boilers operate under that capacity. 3-171

Table 5. Bio-Mass and Natural Gas Heating Costs Natural Gas Wood Shavings Corn Costs to Heat Greenhouses Using All Three Fuels Usage Costs Usage Costs Usage Costs 2001-2002 21,558 $107,990 N/A N/A N/A N/A $107,990 2002-2003 20,869 $105,547 N/A N/A N/A N/A $105,547 2003-2004 18,565 $106,786 N/A N/A N/A N/A $106,786 2004-2005 13,128 $95,062 2982 $4660 1704 $9,901 $109,623 2005-2006 2,233 $28,401 9,898 $16,703 4790 $31,226 $76,353 2006-2007 9662 $79,346 7,785 $13,137 2,654 $26,265 $118,748 Table 6. Heating Cost if Only Using Natural Gas Cost of Natural Gas Per 2005-2006 Usage Cost September 35 $11.75 $411 October 1522 $15.21 $23,146 November 2670 $15.21 $40,606 December 3684 $12.90 $47,528 January 2932 $13.42 $39,349 February 3774 $10.03 $37,857 March 2278 $10.43 $23,760 April 26 $18.75 $488 for 2005-2006 $213,145 2006-2007 Usage Cost of Natural Gas Per Cost September 366 $17.99 $6,584 October 1331 $5.66 $7,533 November 3411 $8.42 $28,721 December 3568 $9.58 $34,181 January 3958 $7.07 $27,912 February 3816 $8.09 $30,871 March 2045 $8.84 $18,078 April 1616 $8.91 $14,399 for 2006-2007 $168,280 3-172

Table 7. Cost Savings and Payback per Year Potential Seasonal Actual Seasonal Cost Cost to Heat to Heat Greenhouses Greenhouses Using Using Natural Gas Natural Gas Only and Bio- Fuels Seasonal Savings 2004-2005 $169,019 $109,623 $59,396 2005-2006 $213,145 $76,353 $136,792 2006-2007 $168,280 $118,748 $49,532 Savings $245,720 Conclusion The decision to install three new bio-mass boilers and retrofit another natural gas boiler to burn biomass fuels has positively impacted the operational costs of Natchez Trace Greenhouses. The facility avoided a sharp increase in the cost of natural gas directly after Hurricane Katrina that caused many other businesses in the region to shut down. The savings produced by the bio-mass boiler system in the 2005-2006 season amounted to $136,792, which is approximately 60% of the implementation cost of the system. Since implementation, the savings accumulated from burning bio-mass to supplement natural gas usage have resulted in an overall savings of more than $245,000. The cost of natural gas will continue to increase due to inflation. Therefore, the bio-mass boiler system implemented at Natchez Trace Greenhouses will continue to save the facility valuable revenue that will ensure it will maintain the required capital to stay in business. 3-173