Sewer Charge & Surcharge Provision Development, Implementation & Benefits

Similar documents
Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

The City of Grand Forks Industrial Pretreatment Program

WHERE DO THE PRETREATMENT PERMIT LIMITS COME FROM??? Amy Varinoski City of Mebane

MUNICIPAL WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION (MWPP) ANNUAL REPORT

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM 101. MWEA IPP Seminar 2017

WASTEWATER PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH SOLVENTS

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

LOCAL LIMITS METHODOLOGY,, ISSUES,, AND ALTERNATIVES

Public Notice. Issuance of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit

NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT EVALUATION

Removal of High Ammonia Levels from Municipal Wastewater Using Humic Acid and Selective Bio-Augmentation

TROUBLESHOOTING OF NITRIFICATION UPSETS AT PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

PRETREATMENT PROGRAM LOCAL LIMITS

Water and Waste Water Management in Yangon, Myanmar

General Information on Nitrogen

Public Notice. Issuance of Industrial Waste Discharge Permit

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

Operations Report. September 10, 2015

BEDMINSTER MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY FEE SCHEDULE

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

Joshua Balentine Tetra Tech, Inc. CWEA Conference Napa, CA February 3, 2015

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Using Washington State s Local Limits Spreadsheet. David J. Knight P.E. Environmental Engineer Water Quality Program June 22, 2016

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

POTW s As An Emergency Option For Dairy Manure Disposal

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Brighton Township Additional Flow at WWTP Monthly Operating Data Expanded and Updated Analysis

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Decentralized WW Management: Issues for Small-Scale WWTPs. Mike Stephens MWEA Local Sections Committee Frankenmuth, MI

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

final report Water quality improvement strategy for a processing site

PRETREATMENT LOCAL LIMITS WHAT IT MEANS TO INDUSTRIES

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Reasonable Potential Analysis & Impacts to Pretreatment Programs. Raj Kapur Clean Water Services

N.J.A.C. 7:14A-1 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM SUBCHAPTER 21. REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIRECT USERS

THE USE OF PROCESS MODELING SOFTWARE IN INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT - CASE STUDIES THAT ADDRESS AIR EMISSION, METALS REMOVAL AND WATER REUSE

TOWN OF HASTINGS, FLORIDA TOWN CODE. Chapter 18. Previous Page. Water and Sewer. Article II. Sewers -- Prohibited Discharges.

Permit Evaluation Report

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT EVALUATION

Hillsdale Wastewater Treatment Plant

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Indian Health Service Sanitation Facilities Construction Program Wastewater Lagoon Operation & Maintenance

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst. NYWEA 81 st Annual Meeting February 3, 2009 One Year Study November 07 - November 08

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter 30 - Occupational Licenses and Registrations

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

4.0 INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL DISCHARGE PERMITS

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

WASTEWATER EFFLUENT DISPOSAL PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS (CAMP BARRETT WASTEWATER PUMP STATION)

Presence And Effects Of Aromatic Hydrocarbons On Sewage Treatment Efficiency

Ammonia Removal and ph Adjustment in Aerated Lagoons

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

OVERVIEW OF MDE WATER & WASTEWATER OPERATOR TREATMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. September 26, 2013

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

ArchaeaSolutions, Inc. Improved Wastewater Processing Driven by Arkea

Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan Update City Project # City of Liberty, Missouri May 6, 2013

Carbon Canyon Water Recycling Facility Title 22 Engineering Report

ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF PAPER MILL WASTEWATER

Clark County Water Reclamation District January 1, 2017

EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Primary Clarifier Odor Control Replacing Nitrates with D.O. Kevin Jacobs, P.E. ECO Oxygen Technologies

Wastewater Management Guidance Manual

Fate of Organic Matter from Leachate Discharged to Wastewater Treatment Plants

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Dealing with Unexpected Wastewater Treatment Plant Disruptions. February 16, 2017

Lessons Learned: How a Small Village Handled a Brewery Expansion

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

Recycling And The New Virginia Stormwater Management Program Regulations VIRGINIA RECYCLING ASSOCIATION 2014 ANNUAL CONFERENCE

MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER PERMITS

Copper Corrosion Control

Conceptual Design for a Future Wastewater Treatment Plant

As used in 314 CMR 7.00, the following words have the following meaning:

MANHEIM AREA WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY (MAWSA) Resolution : Fee Schedule

Water Specialists for the Food & Beverage Sector creating value in water through innovation, creativity and expertise. ovivowater.

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Effect of holding time on E.coli Densities in Wastewater Samples

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Benefits of On-line Monitoring of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Sanitary Sewer and Disposal Ordinance # Columbus Water Works. Columbus, Georgia

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM FOR THE K.I. SAWYER WWTP MARQUETTE COUNTY GWINN, MICHIGAN

Fixed-Film Processes

Triplepoint Environmental

ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP

Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) System for Additional Nitrification at the Coldwater WWTP

Northfield Township WWTP Capacity Evaluation Report

WASTE WATER T*R*E*A*T*M*E*N*T T*E*C*H*N*O*L*O*G*I.E

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

NPDES COMPLIANCE OF COOLING TOWERS BLOWDOWN AT POWER PLANTS WITH RECLAIMED WATER AS SOURCE WATER

Transcription:

Sewer Charge & Surcharge Provision Development, Implementation & Benefits 2013 Industrial Wastewater Conference Bethlehem, PA (October 4, 2013)

Human Waste Treatment History (1) Historically dilution in streams (Pits & discharge to streams) (2) 1887 : First biological treatment (Intermittent sand filter) in Medford, MA (3) 1899 : First Federal regulation of sewage Rivers & harbors Appropriations Refuse Act prohibiting discharge of solids to navigational waters without permit from US Army Corps of Engineers (4) 1901 First Trickling filter in Madison WI; 1909 Imhoff tank for solids settling; (5) 1914 liquid chlorine disinfection; (6) 1916 Activated sludge plant, St. Marcos, TX; 1940 s Secondary Treatment process to remove BOD (7) 1948 Federal Water Pollution Control Act for water quality surveys & construction of sewage collection and treatment plants. 1972 Clean Water Act (8) 1960 Present : Treatment process advances include improved activated sludge processes, nutrient removals (ammonia, phosphorus, nitrates), oxic/anoxic systems, sequencing batch reactors, MBR, improved sludge digestion (high temp), etc.

Wastewater (Sewage) Treatment Plant & Treatment Capabilities (1) Design to treat human waste (domestic wastewater) (2) Design for specific parameters: BOD, TSS, NH3 (TKN) (Others: Phosphorus, Nitrate, Metals) (3) Treatment/Removal of Pollutants as a by product of biological treatment Biodegrade: O&G/TPHC, organics Release to air: Volatile organics Sludge Accumulation: Conventional pollutants, Metals, organics (untreated) (4) Untreated pollutants released to Surface Waters (submit to the permit) (5) Accumulated sludge Disposed offsite

Discharges to Sanitary Sewer System (1) Sanitary discharge from households; (2) Stormwater (runoffs/overflows/combined sewers) (3) Groundwater inflow/infiltration (4) Commercial Discharge (Non domestic in nature) (Restaurants, laundries, carwash, garages, print/photo, NCCW, etc.) (5) Industrial Wastewater (Manufacturing and processing)

Protecting Wastewater Treatment Plant Design for domestic wastewater (human / household waste) Protect the treatment plant from any plant interference, inhibition, and bypass from non designed or incompatible discharge sources; Document all criteria applicable to plant and its operations: plant Design, process inhibition, process interference, sludge quality interference, NPDES (stream) discharge criteria, sludge disposal criteria, and worker safety Define what quality of non domestic wastewater could be acceptable to protect the plant. Development of plant specific local discharge limits Adopt and implement the local sewer discharge limitations

Typical Local Discharge Limitations BOD 5 250 (2) TSS 250 (2) NH 3 N) 25 (2) TKN 40 (2) Oil/Grease 100 Temp. 65 Celsius ph 5.5 10.0 S.U. Arsenic (T) 1.00 Beryllium(T) 0.10 Cadmium(T) 0.25 Chromium(T) 2.12 Copper (T) 2.88 Lead (T) 2.22 Mercury (T) 0.13 Molybdenum 0.16 Nickel (T) 3.09 Selenium (T) 0.20 Silver (T) 2.60 Zinc (T) 4.26 Cyanide (T) 1.04 Flash Point 140 0 F(Min.) Total Toxic Organics (TTO) (3) (1) All units in mg/l, unless otherwise specified. All limitsasdailymaximum(composite samples), except for the instantaneous limits for the grab sample parameters. (2) A surcharge option for higher BOD 5, TSS, NH 3, and/or TKN limits may be available (see Section 6.4). (3) TTO limits may be imposed on a case by case basis. Discharge of toxic or hazardous substances is also prohibited under Section V. See Appendix B for the list of Total Toxic Organics. 6.4 SURCHARGE PROVISION FOR CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS 6.5 EXCEPTION & EXEMPTION PROVISIONS

Plant Available Treatment Capacities & Future Planning Review available excess capacities for: Flow, BOD, TSS, Ammonia and other plant design parameters; Address the service area (participating municipalities) future planning and growth; Assess available excess treatment capacities for the Designed pollutant parameters

Typical Plant Design and Compliance Criteria (A) (B) Typical biological WWTP design criteria are (Varies with plants): (1) BOD5 200 250 mg/l (Influent) 90% Removal rate (EPA minimum 85%) (2) TSS 200 250 mg/l (Influent) 90% Removal rate (EPA minimum (3) NH3 25 40 mg/l (Influent) 90 95% Removal rate Typical WWTP Discharge/Effluent Limitations: (1) BOD5 8 12 mg/l (2) TSS 30 45 mg/l (3) NH3 1.0 3.0 mg/l (Varies Summer/Winter limits) (4) Others: Phosphorus, Nitrates, Metals (Additional pollutants and discharge limitations and requirements based upon Federal and State permits)

Plant Design, Actual Performance & Capacity (A) If the WWTP is operated as designed, typically plant has excess capacities available to treat additional BOD5, TSS and NH3; likely due to Higher pollutant removal rates (Consistent below the effluent discharge quality requirements)better compliance Lower plant influent pollutant concentrations (In recent years some increases in pollutant concentrations due to the water conservation) Note: Higher available loading capacity does not mean the plant will operate under same conditions and at the same efficiency with higher influent pollutant loads. Need to check available air/supply and treatment capacities, retention time, effects on nitrification and bio treatments, higher sludge capacity, effect on other treatment units, etc. What to do with the excess available pollutant treatment capacities available at the plant?

Plant Design, Actual Performance & Capacity (Example) NJPDES POTW DESIGN 2011 POTW DATA (1) DAILY 2011 POTW LOADINGS (3) Calculated Daily Safety Available (5) PARAMETERS LIMIT CONCEN. LOADINGS Influent Effluent Removal LOADING Domestic Commercial Industrial Loading For Factor Daily Loading CAPACITY Loading Loading Loading Ind./Comm. ( @ 10%) For Ind./Comm. (mg/l) (mg/l) (lbs/day) (mg/l) (mg/l) (% ) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) FLOW in MGD 4.61 4.61 2.26 2.260 2.220 2.26 1.649 0.370 0.241 BOD5 (6) 8.0 220.0 4146.6 119.3 2.00 98.3 8994.5 1640.7 7353.8 735.4 6618.4 TSS 30.0 220.0 4146.6 221.0 1.06 99.5 117891.4 3039.3 114852.1 11485.2 103366.9 (< 1.00) NH3 2.0 29.0 546.6 26.7 0.42 98.4 2396.4 367.2 2029.2 202.9 1826.3 (< 1.00) TKN (7) 3.0 60.0 1130.9 37.3 1.00 97.3 2109.1 513.0 1596.2 159.6 1436.5 PHOSPHORUS(8) 4.5 4.63 1.46 68.3 267.6 63.7 203.9 20.4 183.5

Sewer Surcharge Option Develop data base for at least 2 3 years and verify excess capacities are available; Hold about 20 % loadings as reserve to address any variations & unforeseen event; Calculate available excess loadings for the design pollutants (BOD5, TSS, NH3) These excess loadings could be made available to industrial and commercial dischargers for a surcharge payment for the actual loadings discharge over the domestic equivalent loadings. Implementation of the sewer surcharge provision is not mandatory, but quite common and recommended (Could be beneficial to POTW and industries)

Sample Primary Treatment Removal Rates Treatment Process Removal Rates Pollutant Month-Year Plant Plant Primary Primary Secondary Nitrification Plant Primary Secondary Nitrification Total FLOW Influent Influent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Removal Removal Removal Removal BOD5 (in MGD) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) 1st Quarter 2/14/11-2/15/11 2.420 123.0 130.0 75.8 33.9 5.8 < 2.0 41.69% 32.23% 21.62% 99.19% 2nd Quarter 4/11/11-4/12/11 2.490 171.0 158.0 70.3 39.5 6.5 < 2.0 55.51% 19.49% 20.87% 99.42% 3rd Quarter 7/11/11-7/12/11 1.960 170.0 152.0 72.0 29.1 5.3 < 2.0 52.63% 28.22% 15.67% 99.41% 4th Quarter 10/3/11-10/4/11 1.940 158.0 132.0 75.3 27.3 4.0 < 2.0 42.95% 36.36% 17.63% 99.37% 2011 AVERAGE 2.203 155.5 143.0 73.4 32.5 5.4 < 2.0 48.20% 29.08% 18.95% 99.35% 2011 LOADINGS 2561.8 =Lbs/day influent load Lbs/day load Removed= 2545.3 TSS (in MGD) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) 1st Quarter 2/14/11-2/15/11 2.420 140.0 174.0 76.0 35.6 4.2 1.0 56.32% 23.22% 18.05% 99.29% 2nd Quarter 4/11/11-4/12/11 2.490 204.0 244.0 63.3 34.4 8.2 1.3 74.06% 11.84% 10.74% 99.36% 3rd Quarter 7/11/11-7/12/11 1.960 290.0 254.0 60.0 20.6 4.0 < 1.0 76.38% 15.51% 6.54% 99.83% 4th Quarter 10/3/11-10/4/11 1.940 236.0 192.0 85.0 35.0 2.4 < 1.0 55.73% 26.04% 16.98% 99.79% 2011 AVERAGE 2.203 217.5 216.0 71.1 31.4 4.7 0.8 65.62% 19.15% 13.07% 99.57% 2011 LOADINGS 3583.2 =Lbs/day influent load Lbs/day load Removed= 3569.6 NH3-N (in MGD) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) 1st Quarter 2/14/11-2/15/11 2.420 19.80 19.00 18.60 17.50 0.05 0.38 2.11% 5.79% 91.85% 98.08% 2nd Quarter 4/11/11-4/12/11 2.490 24.50 23.00 22.80 19.00 0.08 0.38 0.87% 16.52% 82.26% 98.45% 3rd Quarter 7/11/11-7/12/11 1.960 31.10 28.00 26.20 20.60 0.10 0.51 6.43% 20.00% 73.22% 98.36% 4th Quarter 10/3/11-10/4/11 1.940 27.00 27.40 26.20 22.00 0.05 0.36 4.38% 15.33% 80.12% 98.67% 2011 AVERAGE 2.203 25.60 24.35 23.45 19.78 0.07 0.41 3.45% 14.41% 81.86% 98.39% 2011 LOADINGS 421.8 =Lbs/day influent load Lbs/day load Removed= 415.0 P(T) (in MGD) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in MG/L) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) (in % ) 1st Quarter 2/14/11-2/15/11 2.420 3.71 4.74 3.46 3.23 1.21 1.04 27.00% 4.85% 42.62% 71.97% 2nd Quarter 4/11/11-4/12/11 2.490 4.77 5.12 3.90 3.65 1.80 1.53 23.83% 4.88% 36.13% 67.92% 3rd Quarter 7/11/11-7/12/11 1.960 5.11 5.21 3.87 2.94 1.82 1.66 25.72% 17.85% 21.50% 67.51% 4th Quarter 10/3/11-10/4/11 1.940 4.26 4.87 3.76 3.50 1.54 1.54 22.79% 5.34% 40.25% 63.85% 2011 AVERAGE 2.203 4.46 4.99 3.75 3.33 1.59 1.44 24.84% 8.23% 35.12% 67.81% 2011 LOADINGS 73.5 =Lbs/day influent load Lbs/day load Removed= 49.8

Calculating Sewer Rates & Sewer Surcharge Rates (1) USEPA guidelines (early 1980 s) for User Charge & Related Revenue System Requirement for a POTW (2) More than one way to calculate rates, as long as it covers POTW costs and reasonably distribute them work related to corresponding pollutants removal (3) Basically calculating the treatment plant capital and operating costs and distributing the cost in the plant design parameters including: Flow (mostly sewer collection system operation) BOD5 TSS NH3 (TKN) Phosphorus & Others (if the plant is designed)

Sewer / User Rates (1) Applicable to all connections (Domestic and non Domestic discharges) (2) Includes Capital and operating costs, including debt obligations, O&M costs (3) Typically, based upon the discharge volume allocation (Equivalent Domestic Unit (EDU) and EDU multiple). (4) EDU could range from 200 300 gallons/home/day (5) Some municipalities may have a fraction of EDU for lower size home ( e.g. 1 2 bedroom houses/apartments may have lower rates than 3 bedrooms)

Sewer Surcharge Rates Calculation (1) Allowed for only pollutants for which the plant is specifically designed (2) Sewer Surcharge Rates are in addition to the Sewer/User Charges (3) Sewer Surcharge Rates are calculated using only Plant O&M and Related Costs, including: All plant operation and maintenance costs, including electricity, chemicals, property maintenance, vehicles, sludge disposal cost, etc. Employee salaries and benefits Plant administration cost Regulatory and compliance cost Related engineering and legal cost DO NOT INCLUDED: Capital cost, debt service cost, IPP cost

Sewer Surcharge Rates Calculation (1) Breakdown of costs to specific Flow, BOD5, TSS, NH3 (TKN), etc. operations (2) Split O&M costs into specific process operations: Collection system (flow), primary treatment, biological/aeration treatment, nitrification, chemical treatment, disinfection, sludge operations, etc. (3) Estimate pollutant removal rate for each treatment unit operation (4) Split general cost items (administration, regulatory, legal, etc.) proportional to overall pollutant removal rates by each treatment unit. (5) Calculate surcharge rates ($$/pound of pollutant) for each pollutant: BOD5, TSS, NH3, etc.

HSA ADMINISTRATIVE COST Yearly Cost FLOW COST BOD5 COST TSS COST AMMONIA COST PHOSPHORUS COST Ref.# % Factor Cost % Factor Cost % Factor Cost % Factor Cost % Factor Cost 1100 Administration : Salaries & wages $198,000 21.32% $42,214 31.61% $62,588 37.39% $74,032 6.80% $13,464 2.88% $5,702 1200 Administration : Fringe benefits $98,471 21.32% $20,994 31.61% $31,127 37.39% $36,818 6.80% $6,696 2.88% $2,836 1300 Administration : Other $61,700 21.32% $13,154 31.61% $19,503 37.39% $23,070 6.80% $4,196 2.88% $1,777 1500 Administration : Insurance $9,500 21.32% $2,025 31.61% $3,003 37.39% $3,552 6.80% $646 2.88% $274 2100 Plant : Salaries & wages $1,540,000 21.32% $328,328 31.61% $486,794 37.39% $575,806 6.80% $104,720 2.88% $44,352 2200 Plant : Fringe benefits $776,900 21.32% $165,635 31.61% $245,578 37.39% $290,483 6.80% $52,829 2.88% $22,375 2500 Plant : Insurance $80,900 21.32% $17,248 31.61% $25,572 37.39% $30,249 6.80% $5,501 2.88% $2,330 2401 Plant : Electricity $330,000 0.00% $0 40.17% $132,561 47.52% $156,816 8.65% $28,545 3.66% $12,078 2402 Plant : Sludge cost $162,000 0.00% $0 38.69% $62,678 54.23% $87,853 6.31% $10,222 0.76% $1,231 2403 Plant : Fuel & water $167,000 0.00% $0 40.17% $67,084 47.52% $79,358 8.65% $14,446 3.66% $6,112 2404 Plant : Maintenance supplies $78,000 0.00% $0 40.17% $31,333 47.52% $37,066 8.65% $6,747 3.66% $2,855 2405 Plant : Maintenance services $149,300 0.00% $0 40.17% $59,974 47.52% $70,947 8.65% $12,914 3.66% $5,464 2406 Plant : Equipment $20,000 0.00% $0 40.17% $8,034 47.52% $9,504 8.65% $1,730 3.66% $732 2407 Plant : Chemicals (Overall plant) $51,700 0.00% $0 40.17% $20,768 47.52% $24,568 8.65% $4,472 3.66% $1,892 2407 Plant : Chemicals (Alum for P(T)) $50,000 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 100.00% $50,000 2410 Plant : Permits & Regulatory $20,800 0.00% $0 40.17% $8,355 47.52% $9,884 8.65% $1,799 3.66% $761 2411 Plant : Office supplies $13,400 0.00% $0 40.17% $5,383 47.52% $6,368 8.65% $1,159 3.66% $490 2412 Plant : Laboratory $122,300 0.00% $0 40.17% $49,128 47.52% $58,117 8.65% $10,579 3.66% $4,476 2414 Plant : Safety $21,200 0.00% $0 40.17% $8,516 47.52% $10,074 8.65% $1,834 3.66% $776 1400 Professional Services (4) (7) $194,900 0.00% $0 40.17% $78,291 47.52% $92,616 8.65% $16,859 3.66% $7,133 2408 Vehicle expense (5) $30,500 80.00% $24,400 7.47% $2,278 7.37% $2,248 4.49% $1,370 0.67% $204 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1600 Township Reimbursement $64,015 100.00% $64,015 $0 $0 $0 $0 1700 Administration : Fiscal Agent $0 100.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2409 Collection System $263,600 100.00% $263,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 2413 Industrial Pretreatment Program (7) $210,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3000 Debt Service $225,000 100.00% $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 4000 Plant Expansion $500,000 100.00% $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Other Admin. Costs $5,439,786 $1,666,613 $1,408,548 $1,679,429 $300,728 $173,852

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Allocating Excess capacity for Payment of Surcharge (1) Calculate overall plant excess capacities for each BOD5, TSS, NH3, etc. (2) Reserve about 20% of excess pollutant capacities (3) Allocate excess Available capacities to industrial/commercial dischargers (typically on a first come first serve basis) (4) Establish upper cutoff discharge limits (Concentrations and/or loadings) for each User, as necessary (5) Document, review and update Available excess capacities each year. (6) Recommended to update the sewer surcharge rates ($$/lb) every two years.

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Assessing Individual Surcharge Cost Equation #1: Rx = Ex (8.34) (365) (QT) (CT) Equation #2: S ind. = (Rx) (Q ind ) (C ind C x,l ) (8.34) Rx = Surcharge rate for parameter (x) in dollars per pound. Ex = Annual O&M cost of the POTW associated with treatment of parameter(s) in dollars per year. QT = Average daily influent flow to the wastewater treatment plant (POTW) in million gallons per day. CT = Average daily influent concentration of parameter (x) to the WTP in mg/l. X = Pollutant parameters e.g. BOD5, TSS, NH3, TKN, etc. (8.34) = Conversion factor. Sind. = Monthly sewer surcharge for Users/dischargers in dollars, which is summation of sewer surcharges for all applicable pollutant parameters. Q ind = Total monthly discharge from the User in millions of gallons. C ind = Average discharge concentration of pollutant parameter (x) in milligrams per liter of the Users discharge C x,l = Discharge (domestic Equivalent) concentration for the pollutant parameter (x) in mg/l.

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Case History (1) Beverage Manufacturer #1 (High BOD loadings) Typical range: Flow 70,000 gpd, BOD5 1,800 mg/l, TSS 600 mg/l Large WWTP with available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (no cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $14,000 (2) Beverage Manufacturer #2 (High BOD loadings) Typical range: Flow 350,000 gpd, BOD5 2700 mg/l, TSS 1000 mg/l Medium WWTP with limited available loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (with cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $125,000 $150,000

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Case History (Continued) (3) Food Processer #1 (High BOD & TSS loadings) Typical range: Flow 120,000 gpd, BOD5 2,200 mg/l, TSS 500 mg/l Large WWTP with available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (no cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $40,000 (4) Food Processer #2 (High BOD & TSS loadings) Typical range: Flow 250,000 gpd, BOD5 1,800 mg/l, TSS 600 mg/l Large WWTP with available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (no cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $60,000 $75,000

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Case History (Continued) (5) Cheese Processer #1 (High BOD & TSS loadings) Typical range: Flow 15,000 gpd, BOD5 900 mg/l, TSS 600 mg/l Large WWTP with available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (no cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $2,000 (6) Small Slaughter House (High BOD, TSS & NH3 loadings) Typical range: Flow 7,000 gpd, BOD5 8,000 mg/l, TSS 1,200 mg/l, NH3 100 mg/l Small WWTP with limited available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (With cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5 and TSS in the range of $20,000

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Case History (Continued) (7) Restaurant / Catering #1 (High BOD, TSS, NH3 loadings) Typical range: Flow 5,000 gpd, BOD5 1,500 mg/l, TSS 1,200 mg/l, NH3 100 mg/l Small WWTP with limited available excess loadings Issued a discharge permit with a surcharge provision (with cutoff limits) Monthly surcharge fees for BOD5, TSS & NH3 in the range of $4,000/month (8) Industrial Manufacturer #1 (High BOD, COD & TSS loadings) Typical range: Flow 60,000 gpd, high variable BOD5, COD, TSS Medium WWTP (will not accept excess loading due chemical manufacturing) Permit with no surcharge provision (BOD5 350, COD 500, TSS 350 limits) Waste stream segregation (concentrates disposed offsite) Installed pretreatment system with equalization, DAF, biological (aeration) treatment, sludge collection (and offsite disposal)

Sewer Charges & Surcharge Surcharge Option or Pretreatment (Pay or Treat) (1) Typically industrial and commercial users are not in business of waste treatment (2) Pretreatment will most likely require biological treatment system (aerobic / anaerobic) (3) Pretreatment design, construction & operation cost varies with flow and load (4) Check available space (5) Check other regulatory compliance requirements (Construction permits, sludge disposal issues, air or other permits, safety) (6) Evaluate costs pretreatment and surcharge rates & decide.

Sewer Charges & Surcharge THANK YOU Contact Information: Richard Lulla, P.E. Senior Associate Hatch Mott MacDonald 111 South Wood Avenue Iselin, New Jersey 08830 973 912 2570 Richard.Lulla@HatchMott.com