Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement

Similar documents
1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Noise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

US 53 Noise Mitigation

BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance

Non-Traditional Noise and Vibration Mitigation Strategies. Christopher Layman, Ph.D. Shannon McKenna Judy Rochat, Ph.D. ATS Consulting Pasadena, CA

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads

Virginia Department Of Transportation. Highway Traffic Noise Impact Analysis Guidance Manual

Impact Assessment Methodology for the. Somerville Public Library August 4, 2008 Jason Ross, P.E. Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.

Noise Reduction and Asphalt Rubber. Douglas D. Carlson RPA Deputy Director Asphalt Rubber Greenbook Workshop 08/22/02 UCSB, California

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

Information Sheet - Mountain Highway Interchange Noise Assessment and Sound Mitigation

Draft Noise Study Report

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY OF KANE

Attractive, Durable Composite Sound Walls

Virginia Department of Transportation I-66 Tier 2 Environmental Assessment

The content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.

Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project

Noise Impact Study for UMore Park Sand and Gravel Resources

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

Canadian Niagara Power Inc. International Power Line Rebuild Project Fact Sheet

FINDINGS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FINDINGS FOR THE INTERSTATE 10 CORRIDOR PROJECT SAN BERNARDINO AND LOS ANGELES COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL. Number Three Wind Farm Lewis County, New York. Case 16-F-0328

I-15 South, MP 0 to MP 16 Environmental Assessment. Public Hearing. August 7, :00 PM to 7:00 PM

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA

An Introduction to the. Safety Manual

Buffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise

TRAFFIC NOISE REPORT

LAS VEGAS STREET RAILROAD CROSSING RR/PUC CONNECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

Evaluation of Highway. Noise Mitigation Alternatives. For Vail Colorado. Final Report October Prepared for. Vail, Colorado.

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

9.0 Noise and Vibration

5 INFORMATION UPDATE TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT TESTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Exposition Light Rail Transit Project

SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE MITIGATION

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Section 13. Guidelines for the Design of Ground Mounted Sign Supports

NOISE STUDY REPORT DESIGN ADDENDUM

TTM & Residential Development Noise Impact Study City of San Jacinto, CA

LONE HILL TO WHITE DOUBLE TRACK STUDY Community Open Houses May 16 & 17

15.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT

AREAWIDE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

STATE ROUTE 85 NOISE REDUCTION STUDY FINAL PHASE 1 REPORT

Report on the Status of Rubberized Asphalt Traffic Noise Reduction in Sacramento County

# 7 ) UN MY PLACE HOTEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

11 NOISE INTRODUCTION NOISE FUNDAMENTALS AND TERMINOLOGY

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

Airborne Noise and The New NY Bridge Project

2016 MUTCD CONCEPT TTC COMMENTS. Michael A. Chacon Traffic Operations Division

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

To: Hyoksang Kwon, COBE Construction From: Joshua Marcley, Mei Wu Acoustics

Phil Pogledich, Senior Deputy Counsel, Yolo County; Petrea Marchand, Consero Solutions

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Link Noise Mitigation Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 12 Noise

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary

03 CONCRETE TAKEOFF SUMMARY REPORT Takeoff and Items Cost Summary. Ryan Manocchio

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

The major findings of the study are based on the following recommendations:

EVALUATION OF LIGHTWEIGHT NOISE BARRIER ON BRIDGE STRUCTURE

Design of Illinois Tollway Composite Pavements

Noise Impact Assessment

Appendix F. Environmental Noise Assessment

Welcome to the Public Information Centre. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. June 25, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

# 17 ) UN DESERT GREEN FARMS SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION OF TIME PUBLIC HEARING

I-91 Viaduct Public Information Briefing

APPENDIX 3.11-A NOISE ANALYSIS DATA

US-101 CORRIDOR ADVISOR S UPDATE 19 MARCH 2015

Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan Application 1. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Chapter 7. Street Drainage. 7.0 Introduction. 7.1 Function of Streets in the Drainage System. 7.2 Street Classification

PREDICTION AND MANAGEMENT OF EMERGENT NOISE IN THE TOMORROW S SUSTAINABLE CITY

Logistics Park Kansas City (LPKC) Edgerton, KS. Infrastructure, Development And Transportation. September 30, 2013

Noise Barrier Material Selection

Sounder Extension to DuPont

IH 820 Corridor Improvement Study Randol Mill Road To North SH 121 Interchange. Public Meeting. Thursday April 4, 2013

Transcription:

Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement NW Bethany Blvd Improvement Project Michael Minor, President Michael Minor & Associates Inc.

Introduction to Acoustics What is Noise? Disturbing sound Measured with Decibels How do We Quantify Noise? Lmax maximum 1-second sound level Leq preferred measurement descriptor Energy average sound level General Rules of Acoustics (generally accurate) Reduction vs. distance (double distance =3 db) Speed and Noise (10 mph = 3 db) Volumes and Noise (half/double = 3 db) Human Perception of Changes in Traffic Noise Levels 3 dba change is minimum most people can perceive 5 dba clearly perceptible to most people 10 dba increase perceived as a doubling

Typical Sound Levels

Traffic Noise Impact Criteria FHWA Criteria for Noise Abatement Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 772) Approach or exceed 67 dba Leq Substantially exceed existing noise levels Local jurisdictions define approach & substantial Washington County Absolute Impact Criteria Defines approach as 1 dba Therefore abatement considered at 66 dba Leq Washington County Substantial Increase Considers a 15 dba increase over the existing noise levels a substantial increase Noise Abatement Considered For all identified impacts

Traffic Noise Abatement Noise Abatement Considered Considered, not required Must meet local criteria for reasonable and feasible mitigation Also set by local jurisdiction Must be Reasonable and Feasible Reasonable: Cost Effective Method $20,000 per residence Up to $25,000 noise > 71 dba, increase > 15 db Feasible: Constructible and Noise Reduction Be constructible (safety, ROW, etc ) Reduction of 5 dba or more Other issues (on structure, ground, etc )

Draft Analysis Methodology Decision Process

NW Bethany Blvd Noise Study Traffic Noise Analysis Methods Followed Washington County Traffic Noise Analysis Manual, March 2002 Met with project design team and county personnel Visited corridor and identified sensitive land uses use and noise sources Received traffic data and design files from project team Measured noise levels, count traffic, obtain travel speeds Model existing and future traffic noise levels Work Still in Process Perform detailed data analysis and comparison Identify (refine) locations above the abatement criteria Consider noise mitigation where required Review mitigation, must be reasonable and feasible Review project construction noise Author noise report and mitigation memorandum

Noise Monitoring Noise levels monitored at 8 locations: M1. Bethany Blvd at Avondale Dr 73 dba Leq M2. 15720 NW Barkton (rear) 71 dba Leq M3. 15775 NW Oak Hills Dr 57 dba Leq M4. Bethany Blvd at Oak Hills Dr 69 dba Leq M5. Bethany Blvd at Audrey Dr 73 dba Leq M6. Audrey Dr at Ramona Dr 59 dba Leq M7. 15745 NW Telshire Ln 63 dba Leq M8. 3190 NW 159 th Pl 60 dba Leq Site M4 Noise Monitoring Notes on monitoring Traffic counts performed during monitoring Monitoring used to verify model Modeling used to determine impacts

Noise Modeling Noise Model Federal Highway s Traffic Noise Model Input to the model includes: Traffic: cars, medium trucks, heavy trucks for existing and year 2030 Speed: posted speed limit Structures: existing buildings, concrete walls, etc. Ground zones: water, grass, paved areas Topographical conditions: hills, elevations, etc.

Preliminary Noise Modeling Results Assumed worst case peak period traffic volumes moving at posted speed Analyzing noise at 53 receivers representing over 150 residences located within 300 feet from Bethany Blvd Existing noise levels range from 56 to 72 dba Leq Future No-Build noise levels increase by 1 to 3 dba over the existing levels, to 58 to 74 dba Leq Future Build noise levels increase by 3 dba over the existing levels, to 58 to 76 dba Leq Currently, 27 receivers meet impact criteria Under the No-Build, 35 meet impact criteria Year 2030 Build, 36 meet criteria

Noise Abatement Measures Project Design Measures: Traffic Management Measures Speed Restrictions (up to 3 db/10 mph) Vehicle Restrictions (heavy trucks are louder) Design Measures Depressed Highways Lids Special Pavement Retaining Walls Noise Mitigation Measures Noise Barriers Sound Walls Earth Berms

How Do Sound Walls Work? Bright Zone Transmission Zone Absorbed Transmitted Noise Shadow Zone Noise Source Reflected Noise Noise Barrier Receiver

Examples of Typical Wall Heights Based on Receiver Elevation Typical sound wall heights range from 14-18 feet (or higher) for residences located above grade along a major 4 to 6 lane highway with light to moderate heavy truck traffic Shadowed Area Shows Noise Diffracted over the Noise Wall First row of homes 6 to 9 dba reduction Second row of homes 3 to 5 dba reduction Third row of homes little or no noise reduction Typical sound wall heights range from 12-16 feet for residences located at grade along a major 4 to 6 lane highway with light to moderate heavy truck traffic Shadowed Area Shows Noise Diffracted over the Noise Wall First row of homes 7 to 10 dba reduction Second row of homes 4 to 7 dba reduction Third row of homes less than 4 dba reduction Typical sound wall heights range from 10-14 feet for residences located below grade along a major 4 to 6 lane highway with light to moderate heavy truck traffic Shadowed Area Shows Noise Diffracted over the Noise Wall First row of homes 7 to 10 dba reduction Second row of homes 5 to 8 dba reduction Third row of homes 4 to 6 dba reduction

Next Steps Update Noise Model Additional Topographical Information Details on backyard elevations Update and revise noise predictions Check curb lines, power line locations, utilities and any other issues that could impact noise wall locations Consider Traffic Noise Abatement Evaluate noise mitigation measures Residual noise impacts (near intersections) Cost of mitigation (reasonable) Noise reduction (insertion loss or feasible) Compare to criteria Work with county on alternatives Complete Noise Technical Report Introduction to Acoustics Methods of Analysis, Measured and Modeled Noise Levels Impact analysis, including detailed tables and figures Mitigation Analysis, including noise reduction, location, etc Construction Noise