SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Similar documents
Typical analytical challenges in the analysis of perfluorinated alkylated substances. Pim de Voogt IBED-University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Marie Curie Initial Training Network Environmental Chemoinformatics (ECO) Final project report July New and old sources of PFAA:

Scientific Evaluation of Contact Water from an Organics Compost Demonstration Site

ANALYSES OF PER AND POLYFLUORINATED ALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) BY LC/MS/MS

Water System Responds to Perfluorochemicals: A Case Study. Brian Goetz Deputy Director of Public Works City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire

Witteveen + Bos / ahu AG ahuag Wasser Boden Geomatik, Aachen (Tina Neef, Axel Meßling, Ulrich Lieser)

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Assessment on groundwater contamination from a former hard chromium plating site in Iggesund

Sources of Perfluoroalkyl Substances to San Francisco Bay Margaret Sedlak and Rachel Allen, San Francisco Estuary Institute

Ex Situ Treatments of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam Impacted Water

Programmatic Approaches to Identification and Management of Federal Sites Potentially Impacted with Perfluorinated Compounds

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast)

Aeration control in a full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment plant: impact on performances, energy consumption and N2O emission

Environmental Pollution

New Contaminants Are Always Emerging. High-Throughput Methods for Testing Serum and Drinking Water

Modelling the WWTP of Nîmes and Validating the Ammonair Control Algorithm to Ensure Low Energy Consumption and N 2 O Emissions

Observation of a Novel PFOS-Precursor, the Perfluorooctane Sulfonamido Ethanol-Based Phosphate (SAmPAP) Diester, in Marine Sediments

National Screening Study on 10 Perfluorinated Compounds in Raw and Treated Tap Water in France

NEWMOA PFAS Technical Workshop Activated Carbon

Benetton Group Restricted Substances List (RSL) contains the complete list of banned or restricted chemical substances.

PFAS analysis in water for the Global Monitoring Plan of the Stockholm Convention. Set-up and guidelines for monitoring

Characterization and Treatment of Perfluorinated Compounds: The Next Big Emerging Class of Contaminants

Identification of point sources of polyfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs) along the River Rhine watershed and their transportation into the North Sea

Extent of Eutrophication in Southern California Estuaries

Preprint - Mechatronics 2008, Le Grand-Bornand, France, May

Abbreviations, Acronyms, Initialisms, and Symbols

Final report for GSGES Short-term Program Kyoto University, Japan

Perfluorinated Alkyl Acid Concentrations in Canadian Rivers and Creeks

Perfluoroalkyl substances in soils around the Nepali Koshi River: levels, distribution, and mass balance

Environmental Science and Engineering Toolbox

Chemical footprints in the snow persistent and hazardous PFCs in remote mountain regions

What have we learnt? A multi-year monitoring of invertebrates and fish in the Rhône River under restoration

29682 Roscoff cedex, France. roscoff.fr 2 RDT/DMSI, Ifremer Centre de Brest, Plouzané, France

Tracking the Turbidity Maximum Zone in the Gironde estuary (SW France) based on continuous monitoring and radionuclides

AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Comparison of conventional and High Velocity Compaction of alumina powders.

Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule Update

Meeting the Requirements of the EPA s Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 3

AgroParisTech, created in 2007, is the French institute for education and research in life sciences, agronomy, food technology and environment

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), flame retardants and cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in indoor air in Uppsala, Sweden

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 1 Desktop Evaluation of Alternatives GenX and Other PFAS Treatment Options Study

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Palmer June /13/01

Quantification of Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Elliott Bay sediments (Seattle, Washington)

Journal of Babylon University/Engineering Sciences/ No.(5)/ Vol.(25): 2017

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

2013 International SWAT Conference, Toulouse, France. Université de Toulouse ; INPT, UPS ; EcoLab, ENSAT, Castanet Tolosan, France 2

Innovation Management in European Projects

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

In Vitro Metabolic Formation of Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonamides from Copolymer Surfactants of Pre- and Post-2002 Scotchgard Fabric Protector Products

Environment International

RNA Quality Control Report

YIR01WQ2 Total oxygen in river stations by river size

ANNEX XV RESTRICTION REPORT

New York State Green Procurement Program Response to Comments on Proposed Amendments to the Specification on Single Use Food Containers

Nutrient Limitation of Phytoplankton By Nitrogen and Phosphorus: Erosion of the Phosphorus Paradigm

ENV 4001: ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING. University of South Florida Civil & Environmental Eng.

Electrical and Ionic Transport Properties. (1) Laboratoire de Recherches sur la Réactivité des Solides

Environmental and integrated criteria for Hot Spots assessment and ranking

RJ van Wijk. CG van Ginkel BIODEGRADABILITY OF CHLORINATED N-ALKANES C (50%) (SCCP); CLOSED BOTTLE TEST METHOD

Using Basic Chemistry in Interpreting Water Source, Age, and Trends KIMM CRAWFORD

Public Health Assessment

Accumulation of metals and metalloids in larvae of insects and frog living in wet sedimentation ponds receiving runoff from a four lane motorway

Chesapeake Bay. report card

Mapping water constituents concentrations in estuaries using MERIS full resolution satellite data

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF La 0.9 Sr 0.1 Cr 1-X Ni X O 3-δ (X = 0-0.6) SYNTHESIZED VIA CITRATE GEL COMBUSTION

A Material Flow Analysis of Paris and its Region

Chemical Substance Control Law; CSCL Japan

AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF PENTADECAFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN

Association Matériaux Dentaires de Paris

Water quality monitoring and assessment: general principles and fitness for purpose

PER AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES IN PLASMA AND FEATHERS OF NESTLING BIRDS OF PREY FROM NORTHERN NORWAY

Causes of Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia

HYPOXIA Definition: ~63 µm; 2 mg l -1 ; 1.4 ml l -1 ; 30 %

Management of Emerging Pollutants in the Marine Environment from the Perspective of a National Monitoring Authority

Lake transparency: a window into decadal variations in dissolved organic carbon concentrations in Lakes of Acadia National Park, Maine

Assessing the Impacts of Metal Mines in Wales

WWF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE Effluent impact assessment:water quality monitoring vs nutrient budget

June Environment Canada. Figure 1: PFOS anion structure

Switch + Go. Nexera UC/s Analysis and evaluation of chiral drugs

A year in the life of a large scale experimental distributed system: the Grid 5000 platform in 2008

Eutrophication Cause Determination Protocol

SAFETY DATA SHEET ACID BATHROOM CLEANER

Safety Summary. Liquid argon

Nutrient Sources, Fate, Transport, and Effects Study of Galveston Bay, Texas Rachel Windham,

SAFETY DATA SHEET APEX HD RINSE ADDITIVE

Qualitative characterization of the first-flush phenomenon in roof-harvested rainwater systems

Groundwater Quality in the Red River Basin and Rolling Plains in Texas

15-20 September, Apimondia 2009, Montpellier, France. Mohamed Alburaki

Impact Of The Urbain And Industrial Rejection On The Environment «Annaba, North - Est Algeria»

Flow restoration of the Durance River: implementation and monitoring of targeted water releases to reduce clogging and improve river function

The role of freshwater ecosystems in carbon and nutrient cycling on the catchment scale. LSUE external launch Steven Bouillon

Application Guide ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE PREPARATION CLEAN QUICK ACCURATE.

ADN environnemental et biodiversité

Tidal transport of DOC, Hg, and MeHg, from Shark River Estuary, Everglades NP

Environmental assessment of metals and inorganics under REACH. Marta Sobanska, European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki

Urbanization Impacts on Surface Runoff. of the Contiguous United States

Transcription:

SUPPORTING INFORMATION Spatio-temporal dynamics of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and transfer to periphytic biofilm in an urban river: casestudy on the River Seine Gabriel Munoz a, Lise C. Fechner b,c, Emmanuel Geneste a, Patrick Pardon a, Hélène Budzinski d and Pierre Labadie d * a : University of Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, LPTC Research Group, 351 Cours de la Libération, F-33400 Talence, France b : Irstea Antony, Unité de Recherche Hydrosystèmes et Bioprocédés (HBAN), 1 rue Pierre- Gilles de Gennes, CS 10030, F-92761 Antony Cedex, France c : AgroParisTech, F-75005 Paris, France d : CNRS, EPOC, UMR 5805, LPTC Research Group, 351 Cours de la Libération, F-33400 Talence, France *Corresponding author. Contact: pierre.labadie@u-bordeaux.fr

TABLE OF CONTENTS Location of the sampling sites...s-3 Characteristics of water samples..s-4 Characteristics of biofilm samples. S-5 PFAS detection frequency and concentration range..s-6 Grain-size distribution in sediment samples S-7 PFAS levels and profiles in sediment samples...s-8 PFAS levels and profiles in biofilm samples....s-9 Correlations......S-10 S-2

Location of the sampling sites Fig.S1. Location of the three sampling sites along the Seine river. Paris downtown is shown in purple and the Paris urban area in pink. Arrows indicate river flow directions. S-3

Characteristics of water samples Table S1. Physico-chemical characteristics of water samples collected along the River Seine (mean and standard deviation (SD, n = 3 4)); N/A: not available. Conductivity (µs cm -1 ) Ca 2+ (mg/l) Mg 2+ (mg L -1 ) K + (mg L -1 ) Na + (mg L -1 ) ph T ( C) Site Campaign Period Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Marnay 1 Sept. 2011 371.3 14.5 68.1 4.8 4.3 0.3 1.6 0.1 7.9 0.6 7.8 0.5 18.2 0.8 Bougival 1 Sept. 2011 521.7 20.7 86.6 1.3 8.0 0.2 5.0 0.5 18.4 0.6 7.6 0.4 20.7 0.8 Triel 1 Sept. 2011 582.0 39.3 93.8 1.6 9.5 0.2 6.5 0.8 23.1 0.6 7.6 0.1 20.8 0.5 Marnay 2 March 2012 N/A N/A 100.4 14.3 4.3 0.4 4.7 0.3 10.5 0.7 7.5 N/A 10.9 N/A Bougival 2 March 2012 N/A N/A 114.1 3.9 7.2 0.2 5.6 0.3 16.4 0.8 7.9 N/A 11.7 N/A Triel 2 March 2012 N/A N/A 119.9 3.7 8.3 0.3 8.3 0.8 20.1 0.8 7.8 N/A 11.7 N/A Marnay 3 July 2012 527.0 N/A 138.2 5.8 4.3 0.2 1.6 0.5 6.1 1.0 7.9 0.2 17.5 1.1 Bougival 3 July 2012 547.0 N/A 138.8 7.6 4.9 0.4 6.0 0.8 15.4 2.4 7.8 0.2 20.5 1.3 Triel 3 July 2012 574.0 N/A 143.4 7.8 4.5 0.3 7.1 0.7 19.5 1.8 7.7 0.2 20.7 1.1 Marnay 4 Nov. 2012 532.3 7.9 122.2 11.9 2.6 1.5 1.8 0.3 7.0 1.5 8.0 0.3 7.1 1.5 Bougival 4 Nov. 2012 551.5 31.3 123.0 14.6 4.0 2.4 3.1 0.4 12.1 2.6 7.8 0.4 7.9 1.9 Triel 4 Nov. 2012 581.3 44.3 120.6 13.0 4.2 2.2 4.0 1.2 14.5 3.3 7.9 0.1 7.5 1.3 S-4

Characteristics of biofilm samples Table S2. Characteristics of biofilm samples collected along the River Seine (mean and standard deviation (SD), n=1 4); N/A: not available. Dry weight* (µg cm -2 ) Organic Carbon (%) Organic Nitrogen (%) Organic C/N ratio Heterotrophic activity* (nm MUF -1 h -1 cm -² ) Chlorophyll a* (mg cm -2 ) Autotrophic index* Site Campaign Period Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Marnay 1 Sept. 2011 1226 12 9.1 N/A 0.9 N/A 10.7 N/A 5.1 0.1 9.5 0.4 233 N/A Bougival 1 Sept. 2011 2151 24 8.1 N/A 1.0 N/A 7.9 N/A 14 1.8 19.8 0.3 245 N/A Triel 1 Sept. 2011 1886 13 8.8 N/A 1.2 N/A 7.1 N/A 14.1 1.4 29.8 1.3 164 N/A Marnay 2 March 2012 4331 92 5.6 N/A 0.7 N/A 8.5 N/A 8.9 0.9 23.6 5 240 N/A Bougival 2 March 2012 1030 25 6.8 N/A 0.9 N/A 7.4 N/A 8.1 1.8 25.2 10.8 83 N/A Triel 2 March 2012 1986 46 9.6 N/A 1.5 N/A 6.3 N/A 15 0.6 10.6 0.6 424 N/A Marnay 3 July 2012 1213 197 5.2 N/A 0.7 N/A 7.9 N/A 30.9 2.3 9.9 0.7 264 N/A Bougival 3 July 2012 1067 32 7.7 N/A 1.1 N/A 7.0 N/A 17.7 3.6 10.2 0.2 399 N/A Triel 3 July 2012 1096 78 9.1 N/A 1.6 N/A 5.6 N/A 17.7 2.6 25 1 184 N/A Marnay 4 Nov. 2012 281 4 4.1 N/A 0.5 N/A 8.8 N/A 0.9 0.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Bougival 4 Nov. 2012 796 13 3.1 N/A 0.4 N/A 8.1 N/A 1.3 0.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A *: data taken from Faburé, J., Dufour, M., Autret, A., Uher, E., Fechner, L.C., 2015. Impact of an urban multi-metal contamination gradient: Metal bioaccumulation and tolerance of river biofilms collected in different seasons. Aquat. Toxicol. 159, 276-289. S-5

PFAS detection frequency and concentration range Table S3. Detection frequency and concentration ranges determined in water (dissolved phase), sediment and biofilm samples. Detection Frequency (%) Water Sediment Biofilm Concentration Range (ng L -1 ) Detection Frequency (%) Concentration Range (ng g -1 dw) Detection Frequency (%) Concentration Range (ng g -1 dw) PFPeA 100 0.075 6.4 0-0 - PFHxA 100 0.17 7.7 0-0 - PFHpA 100 0.074 2.8 0-0 - PFOA 100 0.16 5.9 89 nd 0.17 100 0.11 1.0 PFNA 97 nd 2.0 22 nd 0.017 73 nd 1.5 PFDA 94 nd 1.5 89 nd 0.27 100 0.10 1.6 PFUnA 39 nd 0.20 67 nd 0.21 82 nd 1.1 PFDoA 18 nd 0.15 78 nd 0.94 82 nd 3.8 PFTrDA 0-33 nd 0.21 64 nd 0.76 PFTeDA 6 nd 0.021 44 nd 0.40 45 nd 1.1 PFBS 70 nd 3.1 0-0 - PFHxS 100 0.28 7.8 67 nd 0.23 100 0.032 0.25 PFHpS 100 0.016 0.90 0-36 nd 0.087 Br-PFOS 100 0.33 14 33 nd 0.10 64 nd 0.82 L-PFOS 100 0.25 16 100 0.081 2.1 100 2.7 21 PFDS 3 nd 0.050 11 nd 0.10 45 nd 0.19 FOSA 76 nd 0.22 89 nd 0.18 73 nd 0.32 MeFOSA 15 nd 0.025 0-0 - EtFOSA 0-0 - 0-6:2 FTSA 97 nd 41 78 nd 0.51 73 nd 1.1 PFASs 1.8 105 0.18 5.1 4.3 32 S-6

Grain-size distribution in sediment samples Fig.S2. Grain size distribution in sediment samples collected along the River Seine. S-7

PFAS levels and profiles in sediment samples Table S4. Total PFAS levels (mean ± SD) in sediment samples collected along the River Seine. Sampling site PFASs ng g -1 dry weight PFASs ng g -1 organic carbon Marnay 1.1 ± 0.3 27.8 ± 9.6 Bougival 2.6 ± 2.2 39.3 ± 32.7 Triel 0.8 ± 0.6 29.6 ± 33.2 MARNAY BOUGIVAL TRIEL Fig.S3. PFAS molecular pattern in sediment samples collected along the River Seine. S-8

PFAS levels and profiles in biofilm samples Fig.S4. Total PFAS level in biofilm samples (ng g -1 dry weight); results are expressed as the mean value and error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3 4). MARNAY BOUGIVAL TRIEL Fig.S5. PFAS molecular pattern in biofilm collected in the River Seine (3 4 samples analyzed per site). S-9

Correlations (1/4) Table S5. Spearman Rank Order correlation coefficients between PFASs in the River Seine (dissolved phase) at MARNAY (n=12). Significant coefficients (p<0.05) are indicated in bold. PFHxA PFBS PFHpA PFOA PFHxS PFNA PFHpS PFDA Br-PFOS L-PFOS FOSA 6:2-FTSA River flow rate PFPeA 0.70-0.32 0.77 0.67 0.60 0.30 0.66 0.78 0.46 0.50 0.55-0.30-0.56 PFHxA -0.28 0.91 0.98 0.57 0.83 0.86 0.80 0.49 0.51 0.82-0.60-0.58 PFBS -0.46-0.18 0.39-0.16 0.11-0.23 0.13 0.12-0.53 0.27 0.47 PFHpA 0.86 0.45 0.72 0.71 0.89 0.46 0.54 0.89-0.65-0.80 PFOA 0.57 0.79 0.83 0.72 0.46 0.49 0.72-0.56-0.52 PFHxS 0.37 0.86 0.60 0.66 0.63 0.27-0.29-0.23 PFNA 0.69 0.65 0.50 0.53 0.83-0.64-0.56 PFHpS 0.81 0.69 0.65 0.66-0.42-0.38 PFDA 0.65 0.68 0.86-0.56-0.72 R-PFOS 0.97 0.41-0.44-0.50 L-PFOS 0.42-0.49-0.61 FOSA -0.57-0.73 6:2-FTSA 0.48 S-10

Correlations (2/4) Table S6. Spearman Rank Order correlation coefficients between PFASs in the River Seine (dissolved phase) at BOUGIVAL (n=12). Significant coefficients (p<0.05) are indicated in bold. PFHxA PFBS PFHpA PFOA PFHxS PFNA PFHpS PFDA Br-PFOS L-PFOS FOSA 6:2-FTSA River flow rate PFPeA 0.86 0.87 0.89 0.79 0.69 0.89 0.83 0.69 0.88 0.87 0.69-0.05-0.60 PFHxA 0.81 0.96 0.89 0.95 0.90 0.94 0.82 0.97 0.93 0.86 0.20-0.83 PFBS 0.79 0.71 0.71 0.80 0.73 0.55 0.83 0.78 0.65-0.01-0.69 PFHpA 0.96 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.81 0.96 0.94 0.89 0.16-0.84 PFOA 0.91 0.90 0.96 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.18-0.86 PFHxS 0.81 0.92 0.77 0.92 0.86 0.92 0.33-0.93 PFNA 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.96 0.82-0.05-0.73 PFHpS 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.85 0.23-0.78 PFDA 0.85 0.90 0.71 0.18-0.56 R-PFOS 0.98 0.90 0.10-0.83 L-PFOS 0.86 0.02-0.76 FOSA 0.20-0.93 6:2-FTSA -0.26 S-11

Correlations (3/4) Table S7. Spearman Rank Order correlation coefficients between PFASs in the River Seine (dissolved phase) at TRIEL (n=12). Significant coefficients (p<0.05) are indicated in bold. PFHxA PFBS PFHpA PFOA PFHxS PFNA PFHpS PFDA Br-PFOS L-PFOS FOSA 6:2-FTSA River flow rate PFPeA 0.98 0.65 0.99 0.94 0.77 0.87 0.76 0.94 0.85 0.94 0.72 0.63-0.86 PFHxA 0.64 0.97 0.94 0.80 0.83 0.76 0.88 0.86 0.93 0.78 0.64-0.92 PFBS 0.65 0.62 0.69 0.50 0.63 0.53 0.63 0.70 0.28 0.86-0.65 PFHpA 0.93 0.78 0.86 0.76 0.93 0.86 0.95 0.72 0.64-0.87 PFOA 0.79 0.89 0.79 0.89 0.85 0.96 0.79 0.67-0.86 PFHxS 0.47 0.96 0.61 0.98 0.89 0.63 0.89-0.72 PFNA 0.41 0.94 0.58 0.78 0.68 0.35-0.83 PFHpS 0.59 0.96 0.90 0.61 0.88-0.65 PFDA 0.70 0.84 0.72 0.46-0.79 R-PFOS 0.94 0.72 0.83-0.77 L-PFOS 0.72 0.78-0.83 FOSA 0.36-0.80 6:2-FTSA - 0.62 S-12

Correlations (4/4) Table S8. Spearman Rank Order Correlation coefficients between river flow rate and major cations in the River Seine (n=12); significant coefficients (p<0.05) are indicated in bold. Marnay Ca 2+ Mg 2+ K + Na + flow rate 0.88-0.58-0.77-0.006 Ca 2+ -0.43 0.56 0.16 Mg 2+ -0.27 0.37 K + 0.10 Bougival Ca 2+ Mg 2+ K + Na + flow rate 0.84-0.92-0.78-0.86 Ca 2+ -0.88-0.75-0.56 Mg 2+ 0.78 0.79 K + 0.71 Triel Ca 2+ Mg 2+ K + Na + flow rate 0.72-0.92-0.92-0.93 Ca 2+ -0.88-0.66-0.67 Mg 2+ 0.81 0.89 K + 0.94 Table S9. Pearson Product Moment Correlation coefficients between BCF and biogeochemical parameters or biofilm characteristics. Significant coefficients (p<0.05) are indicated in bold. BCF PFOA BCF PFHxS BCF PFOS Temperature -0.19-0.15-0.44 Dissolved Ca 2+ -0.37-0.40-0.17 Dissolved Mg 2+ -0.58-0.56-0.67 Dissolved K + -0.68-0.71-0.76 Dissolved Na + -0.79-0.69-0.85 ph -0.03 0.16 0.32 Dissolved PFAS concentration -0.68-0.64-0.73 Biofilm dry weight (µg cm -2 ) 0.24-0.13-0.08 Biofilm organic nitrogen content (%) -0.48-0.41-0.58 Biofilm organic carbon content (%) -0.20-0.11-0.40 Biofilm organic C/N ratio 0.78 0.79 0.71 Heterotrophic activity (nm MUF/h/cm²) -0.16-0.35-0.29 Autotrophic index -0.03-0.06 0.06 Chlorophyll a (mg cm -2 ) -0.34-0.34-0.46 S-13