GGGI Low-Carbon Development Activities: Country Cases from Mongolia and the Philippines Asia-Europe Environment Forum Annual Conference: 7 September, 2017
Outline: 1. Brief introduction about Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) 2. Case-1 from Mongolia: Green Educational Building 3. Case-2 from Philippines: Green Business Practices among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)
GGGI at a Glance Our Vision A resilient world of strong, inclusive and sustainable growth. Our Objective GGGI Member countries move towards a model of green growth. While this will be differentiated for countries, at its core will be strategies that simultaneously achieve poverty reduction, social inclusion, environmental sustainability and resource security. 1.Strengthened national green growth planning, financing and institutional frameworks. 2. Increased green investment flows. 3. Improved multi-directional knowledge sharing and learning between countries on green growth. 3
GGGI Thematic Areas and Links to SDGs Maximizing Impact through Four Thematic Priorities: Norway Denmark United Kingdom Hungary Mongolia China Republic of Korea Headquarters Energy Water Land-Use Mexico Costa Rica Colombia Guyana Green City Development Peru Multi-Sectoral Member Countries Paraguay Senegal Morocco Uganda Jordan Qatar UAE Ethiopia Rwanda Mozambique Nepal India Laos Myanmar Thailand Vietnam Philippines Cambodia Indonesia Papua New Guinea Vanuatu Fiji Kiribati Australia
A Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings Current technology GREEN KINDERGARDEN GREEN PUBLIC TRANSPORT Six interrelated components: Vision Developing Public Transport Oriented Green City 1. Technology options analysis for kindergartens (with GTC-K) 2. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) of selected options 3. Assessment of potential financing mechanisms for selected options 4. Demonstration of public kindergarten design specifications 5. Full suite of construction plan for demonstration of public kindergarten 6. Guideline on green engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) of public education buildings Goal (2020) 1. Reduction of GHG Emission in Transport Sector by 10% 2. Increase Public Transport Modal Share by 20% 3. Improve Average Traffic Speed for Bus by 20% Bus Route System Fare system&smart card Main Task Intelligent Transport System (ITS) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 10 Green Development Overview Capacity Building of Multiple Stakeholders and Cost benefit analysis of green public kindergarten Facilities in Mongolia Financing Mechanisms for Green Public Education Buildings in Mongolia July, 2016 May 2016 Adapting Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) to the Green Building Principles August 2016 i Prepared by: i i
Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings
Mongolia Case: PPP for Green Educational Buildings Financial Specifications: Initial cost of investment is 25% greater than Business-As-Usual (BAU) Model Operating costs, including heating, electricity, water, and waste water treatment, were significantly lower, reducing the pressure on state and local budgets. Total operating and maintenance cost is half of the BAU model. Remove up to 120 tons of CO 2 emission by reducing the use of coal for heating. Indirect benefits are improve indoor air quality, health of children and staff Project payback period is 14 years
Philippines Case: Green Practices among MSMEs in Food Processing Sector Are there any green practices among MSMEs? If yes, is greening profitable? What is role of MSMEs in the Philippine economy and what does green practice mean? Which MSMEs in coffee, cocoa, fruits and nuts processing sectors have green practices? What are green practices levels (change of mindset, affordable purchase or technological solutions)? How green practices are beneficial and profitable to these businesses (SWOT and CBA)?
Philippines Case: Green Practices of MSMEs in Food Sector Key findings Cacao Coffee Processed Fruits (Banana) Processed Nuts (Pili) Green practices among MSMEs in coffee, cocoa, fruits and nuts processing sector the Philippines is at infancy stage (limited green practices and low response at the moment) Greening intervention does not always require investment Greening is profitable (CBA results in 58%-75% cost savings and IRR 19%-224%) Growing market demand, strong potential to expand and limited resources (SWOT analysis) Needs more leveraging support from the Government, cluster associations and development partners in knowhow/research, financing and market expansion.
Thank You Follow our Activities on Facebook and Twitter www.gggi.org
Bulganmurun Tsevegjav Program Integration Lead GGGI Philippines Bulganmurun.ts@gggi.org T: +63 915 762 1230 / + 976 9912 2030 Bulganmurun Tsevegjav is a Program Integration Lead at the Green Growth Planning and Implementation Division of the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI). Based in Manila, she currently works at Philippine Country Program, providing professional expertise on ongoing program activities where GGGI is continuing to build its in-country assistance directed towards the paths to inclusive growth and climate resilience together with the Philippine Government. She also manages a project with the Department of Trade and Industry to assess benefits of green interventions among Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in the Philippines.