CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

Similar documents
The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)

Appendix C. Activity Codes

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

La Grande Ranger District

Idaho Panhandle National Forests

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Proposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project

Kreist Creek. Environmental Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT

Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

PRESCRIBED FIRE IN SOUTHWEST IDAHO

Province Integrated Resource Management Project

Table of Contents. 1 Introduction. 2 Decision. 3 Rationale for the Decision. 4 Other Alternatives Considered

Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Ashland Tree Planting Project

Boulder Creek Restoration Project

Willamette National Forest Sweet Home Ranger District

Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

DECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)

Camp Lick Project. Recreation Report. Prepared by: Teresa L. Dixon Recreation Program Manager. for:

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST

Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District

Appendix 1 Hood River Stewardship Crew Collaborative Recommendations

APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES

Preliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake

Lakeview Stewardship CFLRP Work Plan 2012

Lake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT

SBEADMR Priority Treatment Areas Process and Results

PLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Commercial Firewood Project. McCall and New Meadows Ranger Districts Payette National Forest

CFLRP Annual Report 2012

Environmental Assessment

Small NEPA Scoping Letter April 2017 Fremont - Winema National Forest

West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe

Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program

James Creek Fuel Reduction Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact

Elkhorn Project Proposed Action

Decision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010

3.1 Forest Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

DECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Sustainable Non-Agriculture Land Management

Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan

NEW Vision 2020 CFLRP Work Plan Template 2012

Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action

Outlook Landscape Diversity Project

North Pioneer Fire Salvage and Reforestation Project

DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)

Birch Project Scoping Report August 2010 Kawishiwi Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Rennic Stark Visual Quality Report March 31, 2011 (edited January 9, 2012) /s/ Norma E. Staaf, Forest Landscape Architect

Environmental Information Worksheet

Scenery Report Salmon Reforestation Project

Appendix G: Alternative Sent by the Karuk Tribe

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

NORTH FORK MILL CREEK REVISED

Mechanical Site Preparation

Dear Interested Party,

Salmon-Challis National Forest Borah Peak Recommended Wilderness Area USFS Region 4 - Idaho

Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME

Forsythe II Project. September 2015

Draft Record of Decision

Environmental Assessment

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD

Hat Creek Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat. LCP Volume II Supporting Analysis for Recommendations

Manchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Idaho Panhandle National Forests Watershed Specialist Review. Extraordinary Circumstances Review: Floodplains, Wetlands, Municipal Watersheds

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Handout for Collaborative Process Participants

DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE

Timber Sale Contract/Purpose and Need/Range of Alternatives

MODULE 5: ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

Cold Springs Project

Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project Record of Decision

DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Hazard Reduction. Timber Sale Project

Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative. Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Proposal Lower Kootenai River Watershed

Transcription:

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the Proposed Action Vegetation management, fuel management, road management and watershed improvement activities proposed for this project are depicted in Table 1. Vegetation management activities include commercial thinning, improvement cuts and regeneration harvest (shelterwood and seedtree). These are the same types of activities discussed during the field trip to the project area and at the workshop to develop the proposed action. Fuel treatment associated with timber harvest activities would occur and would include underburning, grapple piling, slash & grapple piling or slash & underburning. Natural fuels/ecosystem burning not associated with timber harvest is also proposed to benefit wildlife habitat. Road management activities are needed to implement the project (e.g. maintenance, reconditioning, reconstruction, temporary road construction). Some roads in the project area that are not needed for project implementation will have restoration work conducted. This restoration road work will reduce sediment contribution to streams (accomplished through road maintenance or reconstruction) or make system roads hydrologically inert if they are no longer needed (decommissioning) or until needed for future use (storage). Some non-national Forest System (NFS)/unclassified roads in the project area that are located on NFS lands will be decommissioned. Upon project completion, closures will be installed for some roads currently closed to public motorized use but that are being used for project implementation. One aquatic organism passage (culvert) was identified for replacement as part of stewardship activities. Replacement would reconnect a small amount of habitat for seasonal fish use by eliminating a barrier. Correct realignment would lower the risk of the culvert plugging and road erosion/washout. Table 1: Summary of Activities and Treatment Size Activity Vegetation Management Commercial Harvest (acres; rounded to nearest whole #) Shelterwood w/ Reserves Seed Tree w/ Reserves Commercial Thin Improvement Cut TOTAL Non-Harvest (acres; rounded to nearest whole #) Natural fuels/ecosystem burning TOTAL Activity/Treatment Size 623 658 615 69 1,965 72 72 1

Activity Activity/Treatment Size TOTAL COMMERCIAL HARVEST AND NON-HARVEST (acres) 2,037 Reforestation (acres) 1,281 Road Management Activities for Project Implementation (Miles; rounded to nearest tenth) Maintenance 15.7 Reconstruction 22.0 Construction of Temp Roads (Decommission after project completion) 3.4 Reconditioning (Decommission after project completion) 4.0 Reconstruction (Stored after project completion) 10.3 Construction of permanent system road None Watershed Improvement Activities (Restoration) Aquatic organism passage repair (# of culverts) Road Maintenance (miles) Road Reconstruction (miles) Road Storage (miles) Road Decommissioning (miles) Regeneration Harvest and Openings Greater than 40 Acres 1 along Quartz Creek 3.5 4.3 1.7 10.7 It is desired to trend the forests in the Jasper project area toward early seral tree species (western larch, ponderosa pine and western white pine) that are less susceptible to root disease fungi and thus decrease the amount of tree mortality occurring. To achieve this desired condition a combination of even-aged and two-aged silvicultural systems are being proposed for some stands. Reforestation of these units is required to occur within 5 years of the unit being harvested. Regeneration harvest is the preferred treatment for some stands for the following reasons: The project area is deficit in stands dominated by early seral species, as they were historically. Stands identified for regeneration harvest are dominated by late seral species (grand fir, Douglasfir, western hemlock) that are susceptible to and experiencing root diseases and insects. Stands are older and existing stand structure is breaking apart, not regenerating to early seral species and creating an unacceptable/undesirable fuel load. A shelterwood with reserves regeneration method is proposed for stands with enough resilient early seral species trees to provide a seed source and moderate the microenvironment in the understory. Following successful establishment of regeneration this harvest method will result in a distinct two-aged stand. A seedtree with reserves regeneration method is proposed for stands that only have enough resilient early seral species trees to provide a seed source but there are not enough reserve seed trees to moderate the microenvironment and thus an exposed microenvironment is created in the understory. Following successful establishment of regeneration this harvest method will result in an even-aged stand. It is also desired that regeneration harvests create a variety of patch sizes and stand structures that break up the homogenization and simplification of the current landscape pattern. Increasing the heterogeneity of patch sizes, stand structures and species compositions will increase the resiliency of forest stands to insects and diseases and decrease the risk of very large wildfire. To create a variety of patch sizes some of the proposed regeneration harvest activities would result in openings greater than 40 acres, as depicted in Table 2. These opening sizes would require Regional Forester approval (FSM 2471.1). 2

Table 2: Openings Greater than 40 Acres Group Unit(s) Treatment Prescription Opening Size (Acres) 1 107 & 107A Shelterwood 113 2 45 & 47 Seedtree 177 3 44 & 44A 44 Shelterwood; 44A Seedtree 55 4 38 Shelterwood 51 5 16 & 16B Seedtree; 15 & 116 15, 16, 16B & 116 Shelterwood 88 6 74 Seedtree 189 Required Design Features The following design features are required to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework for this resource and/or to reduce the risk of adverse impacts to this resource. A description is provided as to when, where and how the design feature should be applied and/or what conditions would trigger the need to apply the design feature. 1. Provisions in the timber sale contract would require that traffic control signs using standards set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2003) be posted on affected routes to alert travelers to haul truck traffic. 2. Provisions in the timber sale contract would restrict timber hauling on the weekends and on summer holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July and Labor Day), unless otherwise agreed. Timber hauling would also be restricted on days when events, for which a special use permit is held (e.g. AERC Equestrian Event), occur in the project area if the days of the event do not fall on a weekend or summer holiday. 3. All brush piles, landing and skid trails will be located at least 200 from the PeeWee and Steep Creek trails unless blocked by topography from the view of trail users. 4. Trailheads will not be used for decking or piling operations and trails will not be used as haul routes. 5. While activities are not anticipated to impact access to the PeeWee or Steep Creek Trails, advanced notice would be provided to key user groups and at the trail head locations should any trails require closure during project implementation. Cause-Effect Relationship Based on concerns raised during the collaborative process to develop this project, units that directly impacted the PeeWee or Steep Creek trail systems were dropped or unit boundaries were adjusted to avoid activities within 200 of the trail systems; therefore, activities are not expected to impact access to the trail systems. Traffic on National Forest System roads is likely to increase as part of project implementation. Design features are in place to reduce impacts from increased traffic and provide advanced notice if trail access is affected during project implementation. 3

Recreationists may experience impacts from smoke associated with burning activities. Burning activities would be coordinated through the Montana/Idaho Airshed Group to minimize or prevent impacts from smoke. No changes to public motorized access, as depicted on the Kaniksu Zone Motor Vehicle Use Map, will occur as part of this project. No wilderness, wilderness study areas, recommended wilderness areas, inventoried roadless areas, national recreation areas or research natural areas exist in the project area or are within close proximity to proposed activities. Regulatory Framework The proposed action has been reviewed and is determined to be in compliance with the management framework applicable to this resource. The laws, regulations, policies and Forest Plan direction applicable to this project and this resource are as follows: Idaho Panhandle Forest Plan (Revised, January 2015) The Forest Plan designates National Forest System lands according to Management Areas (MA). MA s are described in terms of their distinctive resource values and characteristics. Recreation is a resource element within the MAs to be managed according to the Standards established by the Forest Plan. The Jasper Mountain project is located in Management Area 6 (General Forest). Most of this MA consists of relatively large areas with roads, trails, and structures, as well as sign of past and ongoing activities designed to actively manage the forest vegetation. This MA provides a wide variety of recreation opportunities, both motorized and non-motorized. The density of motorized routes in this MA is higher than most of the other MAs. Constructed improvements in this MA generally consist of campgrounds, picnic or day use areas, trails, lookouts, and cabins. Most of the WUI on the Forest occurs within MA6 and activities designed to reduce hazardous fuels are common. Vegetation and watershed restoration is accomplished predominantly through active management. Evidence of past management activities vary across the landscape, but are generally more noticeable in this MA than others. Many of the acres within this MA are suitable for the production of timber on a regulated basis, providing wood fiber in response to regional and national demand. The following desired conditions and guidelines apply to Access and Recreation within MA 6; however, no standards for MA 6 are applicable to Access and Recreation. Desired Conditions A range of recreational opportunities (e.g., motorized and non-motorized) are provided within this MA while route conditions are maintained or improved. Summer and winter recreation opportunities and experiences are consistent with the ROS classification of semi-primitive non-motorized to roaded natural. Existing recreation facilities are managed to accommodate public use and provide safe recreation experiences. 4

Guidelines Motor vehicle use is allowed. Mechanized use is allowed (e.g., mountain bikes and other wheeled equipment). Road construction is allowed. Reconstruction of roads is allowed. Management activities should be consistent with the Scenic Integrity Objective of Low to High. Activities proposed for the Jasper Mountain project are consistent with the Forest Plan. Extraordinary Circumstances Following are the resource conditions that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances related to a proposed action warrant further analysis and documentation in an EA or an EIS: 1) Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species; 2) Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds; 3) Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas; 4) Inventoried roadless areas or recommended wilderness areas; 5) Research natural areas; 6) American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites; and 7) Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. The following conditions were necessary to consider for this resource and the following determinations are made based on a review of the proposed action, required design features, the regulatory framework, and necessary analysis for this resource: Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas; Extraordinary Circumstances Determination: Will not have extraordinary circumstances associated with the proposed actions. Explain Determination: No wilderness, wilderness study areas, wild and scenic river or national recreation areas are located in or within close proximity to the project area. Inventoried roadless areas or recommended wilderness areas; Extraordinary Circumstances Determination: Will not have extraordinary circumstances associated with the proposed actions. 5

Explain Determination: No inventoried roadless areas, recommended wilderness areas or any other area of forest plan special designation are located within the project area. Specialist: Dan Gillfillan April 1, 2015 6