MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
|
|
- Alice Houston
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST FERRON RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 2240 PROJECT TITLE: Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development PROJECT LEAD: Steven Cox ESTIMATED DATE FOR IMPLEMENTATION: July 31 st 2014 Exclusion: 36 CFR 220 6(e)(_9_). LINE OFFICER DIRECTIONS This documents my instructions to proceed with the NEPA analysis for the proposed Olsen-Gentry Livestock Water Development Project on the Ferron Ranger District and provides you with the opportunity to identify any concerns or specific information important for me to be aware of prior to making a decision regarding this proposal, including any recommendations for Design Features pertinent to your resource specialty. If you choose to use this document as a resource specialist report, address current conditions, potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects discussions, limited to displaying the potential for this project to breach a significance threshold regarding extraordinary circumstances. Attach pertinent citations supporting your conclusions with any maps and supporting references for the project record. The projected level of analysis for the document is a Categorical Exclusion (36 CFR 220 6e(9)) Implementation or modification of minor management practices to improve allotment condition or animal distribution when an allotment management plan is not yet in place I will use this analysis to determine if it is appropriate to proceed with the project or if additional NEPA documentation (EA or EIS) is required prior to implementation. November 11, 2013 Darren Olsen Date District Ranger PART 1 Project Proposal PROPOSED ACTION: Well-defined proposal that includes all aspects of project design, including mitigation measures and monitoring requirements and timing. Attach map of the project area. Identify who will be the project lead, what is the proposal, and when is the proposed date of implementation. The Ferron-Price Ranger District of the Manti-La Sal National Forest proposes the installation of five livestock watering facilities. Three facilities on Olsen Bench S&G Allotment, one at the Orange-Olsen Guard Station, and one on the Gentry C&H Allotment in McCadden Hollow. Olsen Bench- Switchback Trough: The proposed action will divert approximately 2 gpm of water from a spring that surfaces in the uphill road cut on the last switchback going up to the White Dugway above Joes Valley (see map #1). A pipeline will carry the water approximately 400 feet to a trough placed north of the road about 200 feet. The pipe will be buried along the road to avoid damage from road work, but once the route leaves the road the pipe will be left on the surface. This trough will be placed on the old road way to lessen new impacts to the ecosystem. White Dugway Trough: Here we will divert roughly 2 gpm from a spring that surfaces on the uphill road cut part way up the White Dugway (see map #1). A pipeline will carry the water approximately 3500 feet to a Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 1 Revised Oct 2010
2 trough placed south of the road about 400 feet. The pipe will be buried along the road to avoid damage from road work, but once the route leaves the road the pipe will be left on the surface. Grassy Road Trough: This diversion will collect roughly 4 gpm from an unnamed stream that comes under the Grassy Lake road about 1.25 miles from where the road intersects with Route 29 (see map #1). A pipeline will carry the water approximately 1300 feet to a trough placed about 200 feet away from the riparian zone. All pipes except at the head box and trough will be left on the soil surface to minimize impacts. Each of these three troughs will be of a flow thru design where the overflow will be returned the watershed at least 50 feet from the trough. Each trough will also have a wildlife escape ramp installed. Guard Station Trough: This diversion will take roughly 5 gpm from Littles Creek just to the north and east of the Orange-Olsen Guard Station (see map #1). A pipeline will carry the water approximately 600 feet to a trough placed inside the corral at the north end of the station compound. This trough will be for Forest Service horses and water will only be diverted when horses are in the station pasture. All pipes except at the head box and trough will be left on the soil surface to minimize impacts. The overflow will be piped back toward the stream and day lighted at least 50 feet from the trough. This trough will also have a wildlife escape ramp installed. On all of the above watering systems a valve will be placed at the head box to allow for shut off of the system and let water return to the normal water course. McCadden Hollow- The proposed action will divert approximately 10 gpm of water from a pond on the East side of McCadden Hollow. A pipeline will carry the water approximately ½ mile to a trough strategically placed on the fence line between East and West McCadden pastures (see map #2). The trough will be a flow thru design and the overflow will be returned the watershed at least 50 feet from the trough. The trough will only be used when cattle are in one of the two pastures (approx. 1 month), and the water will be returned to its normal course the remainder of the year. The pipe will be buried to avoid vandalism from the public and abuse from livestock and wildlife. The trough will also have a wildlife escape ramp installed. PURPOSE AND NEED: Identify why this project needs to take place There is a need to obtain a more uniform distribution of livestock use across these allotments. The purpose of these watering systems is to encourage use of these areas at appropriate times and thereby further scattering utilization and soil disturbance over larger areas. The installation of these watering systems will also serve to reduce the impact of livestock on riparian areas which currently receive heavy use. LOCATION OF PROPOSED ACTION: Provide a map of the project area with other resource areas identified (allotments, IRA s, RNA s, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, etc.) See attached maps PLAN CONFORMANCE REVIEW: The proposed action has been reviewed for conformance with the Forest Land Management Plan (1986). Lists the decisions and/or identify management requirements, mitigation measures and design features. Forest Plan Checklists must be completed. The proposed action will help meet management goals established in the Manti-LaSal National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Invest in Range improvements that provide the greatest benefit (Forest Management Goals III-3). Protect and enhance riparian areas (Forest Management Goals III-2). Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 2 Revised Oct 2010
3 Adjustments coupled with improved grazing management and range improvements would provide for achievement of Forest Plan goals for grazing and maintenance of a stable local livestock industry (Record of Decision Manti-La Sal National Forest land and Resource Management Plan pg. 9). CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW: The proposed action is categorical excluded under 36 CFR 220 6(e)( ). List the categorical exclusion(s): This decision is categorically excluded from preparation of an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement under FSH , Low impact range management activities, such as fencing seeding and installing water facilities. In reviewing all of the categories, I have determined the effects of these projects fall within the effects of the listed examples in Chapter 30 for categorical exclusions. Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 3 Revised Oct 2010
4 PART 2 Preliminary Internal Review and Issue Identification The proposal has been reviewed to determine the potential of any of the exceptions described In 36 CFR 220 6(b). Surname(s) verify completion of this review by appropriate specialists. Provide information that describes current conditions and provides potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects discussions, limited to displaying the potential for this project to breach a significance threshold regarding extraordinary circumstances. List design feature recommendations and attach pertinent citations supporting your conclusions with any maps and supporting references for the project record. It is imperative that each resource area that is a part of the ID Team must provide a narrative and sign the appropriate section of this checklist form. EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES (ref 36 CFR 220 6(b)): (1) Resource conditions that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances related to a proposed action warrant further analysis and documentation in an EA or an EIS are: (i) Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species; (ii) Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds; (iii) Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas; (iv) Inventoried roadless area or potential wilderness area; (v) Research natural areas; (vi) American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites; and (vii) Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. (2) The mere presence of one or more of these resource conditions does not preclude use of a categorical exclusion (CE). It is the existence of a cause-effect relationship between a proposed action and the potential effect on these resource conditions, and if such a relationship exists, the degree of the potential effect of a proposed action on these resource conditions that determines whether extraordinary circumstances exist. Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 4 Revised Oct 2010
5 RECREATION / WILDERNESS / VISUAL RESOURCES The proposal would not adversely affect unique geographic characteristics such as park, recreation, or refuge lands, wilderness areas, Inventoried Roadless areas, unroaded undeveloped areas, wilderness study area, wild and scenic rivers including those listed on the Department s National Register of Natural Landmarks. Identify the areas that would be affected if any: If areas will be affect are there mitigation measures or design feature to reduce or eliminate impacts? Wilderness Staff: Visual Staff: Recreation Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 5 Revised Oct 2010
6 CULTURAL / HISTORICAL / PALEONTOLOGICAL The proposal has no potential to disturb the ground or damage features or structures (Memo required for project file) Memo can be completed by (give earliest date): The project has been inventoried for cultural resources and no sites were found (Archaeological report required) Project design can avoid or protect any known/suspected sites; project needs survey (archaeological report required) Estimated cost to complete project survey (number, grade level and days required) The proposal does not threaten to violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment. The proposal would not adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. NOTE: Appropriate consultation with Native American tribes is always required under NHPA and ARPA as amended Archaeological Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 6 Revised Oct 2010
7 WILDLIFE / FISH / THREATENED, ENDANGERED, PROPOSED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES 1. No TEP species involved (go to #4) 2. TEP Species involved but No Effect expected (go to #4) 3. TEP involved USFWS consultation expected (complete 3a 3f and #4) a. Document full analysis of all alternatives and all species for project file; this includes threatened, endangered and potential species, management indicator species and special interest species. b. If something can t be mitigated analyze as an issue in EA c. Write BA for the preferred alternative d. Submit BA on preferred alternative to the USFWS e. Expect concurrence/denial within 30 days f. Circulate BA for USFS signatures 4. No sensitive species involved (go to #5) 5. Sensitive species involved, no impact expected (go to #6) 6. Sensitive species involved (complete 6a 6b) a. Write BE for preferred alternative b. Circulate BE for USFS signatures **Estimated cost, if any, for project support (include GS grade level, number of personnel and number of days): Wildlife Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 7 Revised Oct 2010
8 FORESTED VEGETATION If the proposed action is fuels treatment, a vegetation prescription will be completed as per Forest Service Manual direction. List any key public contacts that need to be made on page 1 Attach any additional information to this document pertaining to this proposal List requested funding needed to support this proposal Forester/Silviculturist Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 8 Revised Oct 2010
9 RANGELAND VEGETATION This project will have no significant effect on developed improvements. (If this project has potential impacts can these impacts be mitigated? At what cost?) This project will have no significant impact on livestock rotation within the planned grazing system. (If this project has potential impacts can these impacts be mitigated? At what cost?) This project will have no significant potential to displace wildlife and have the potential to impact other grazing allotments. List any key public contacts that need to be made on page 1 Attach any additional information to this document pertaining to this proposal List requested funding needed to support this proposal Rangeland Management Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 9 Revised Oct 2010
10 Wetlands, Floodplains, Municipal Supply Watersheds, Impaired Waters There are no wetlands in the project area. There are wetlands in the project area, but no adverse effects are anticipated. Document rationale, may include involvement in project design, walk-through of project area, BMP s, SWCP s, buffer zones, etc. There are wetlands in the project area, adverse effects are possible. Document additional field investigation to confirm locations and proximity of wetlands to proposed activities. Document needed modification to proposed activities, additional design criteria, mitigation measures, or other measures. There are no floodplains or flood-prone areas in the project area. There are floodplains or flood-prone areas in the project area, but no adverse effects are anticipated. Document rationale, may include involvement in project design, walk-through of project area, BMP s, SWCP s, buffer zones, etc. There are floodplains or flood-prone areas in the project area, adverse effects are possible. Document additional field investigation to confirm locations and proximity of floodplains or flood-prone areas to proposed activities. Document needed modification to proposed activities, additional design criteria, mitigation measures, or other measures. Municipal supply watersheds (FSM 2542) include surface supply watersheds, sole source aquifers, and the protection zones around well and springs. There are no municipal supply watersheds or drinking water source areas in the project area. There are municipal supply watersheds or drinking water source areas in the project area, but no adverse effects are anticipated. Document rationale, may include involvement in project design, walk-through of project area, BMP s, SWCP s, buffer zones, etc. There are municipal supply watersheds or drinking water source areas in the project area, adverse effects are possible. Document additional field investigation to confirm locations and proximity of municipal supply watersheds or drinking water source areas to proposed activities. Document needed modification to proposed activities, additional design criteria, mitigation measures, or other measures. Is it likely that the degree of potential effect of the proposed action on wetlands, floodplains, or municipal supply watersheds constitutes an extraordinary circumstance. NO YES Is the project area adjacent to or tributary to a water quality limited stream segment or lake (from current 303(d) list or a TMDL)? NO YES complete Clean Water Act Worksheet. List any key public contacts that need to be made on page 1 of this document. Attach any additional information pertaining to this proposal. This may include required BMP s/swcp s/mitigation, Clean Water Act Worksheet, maps, etc. The proposal complies with Executive Order (Floodplain Management). The proposal complies with Executive Order (Protection of Wetlands). The proposal complies with the Clean Water Act. The proposal complies with the Safe Drinking Water Act. The proposal complies with Forest Plan management direction. The proposal complies with Utah Anti-degradation Policy (R ). Hydrologist, Soil Scientist, and/or District Watershed Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 10 Revised Oct 2010
11 MINERALS/LANDS Special use permitees are identified on page 1 List any key public contacts that need to be made on page 1 Attach any additional information to this document pertaining to this proposal List requested funding needed to support this proposal Minerals Specialist Lands Specialist: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 11 Revised Oct 2010
12 FIRE / FUELS / PRESUPPRESSION / AIR QUALITY This project does not directly affect the safety of fire fighters If this project involves prescribed burning insure smoke management concerns are addressed as per the State Implementation Plan for Smoke Management and that smoke management is addressed in the burn plan as per manual direction (FSM 5144 and 5108) NEPA Smoke Guidance (Nov 2005) and the Interagency Prescribed Fire Guide (Jul 2008) have been reviewed and are incorporated into the NEPA document. An electronic copy is located at J:\fsfiles\office\nepa\nepaadmin\FireResources. Fire Staff: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 12 Revised Oct 2010
13 LAW ENFORCEMENT / PUBLIC SAFETY The proposal would have no significant adverse effects on public health or safety. List any key public contacts that need to be made on page 1 Attach any additional information to this document pertaining to this proposal List requested funding needed to support this proposal Law Enforcement: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 13 Revised Oct 2010
14 Project Area Map Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development Map #1 Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 14 Revised Oct 2010
15 Map #2 Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 15 Revised Oct 2010
16 Map #2 Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 16 Revised Oct 2010
17 Map #4 Olsen-McCadden Livestock Water Development Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 17 Revised Oct 2010
18 PART 3 PRELIMINARY DECISION (Responsible official to complete the following) YES YES YES YES YES YES NO This proposal would have significant and controversial environmental effects. NO Extraordinary circumstances are found associated with this project. NO The proposal is directly related to other actions which are individually insignificant, but cumulatively have significant effects. NO The proposal would have highly uncertain or potentially significant environmental effects and involves unique or unknown environmental risks. NO The proposal would establish a precedent for future action(s) or represents a decision in principle about a future consideration with potentially significant environmental effects. NO This proposal, as stated, requires further analysis and an environmental assessment is required. I have determined that the proposal is in conformance with the Manti-La Sal National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (1986) as amended. It is my decision to implement the proposal, as described. APPROVED BY: District Ranger DATE: Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 18 Revised Oct 2010
19 PART 4 INTERDISIPLINARY TEAM AND TIMELINES (Responsible official to complete the following) PROJECT INITIATION LETTER COMPLETED: This document 11/08/2012. Project implementation 08/01/2013 IDT LEADER: Steven Cox IDT MEMBER: Jan Curtis-Tollestrup SPECIALIST: Hydrology/Water Rights IDT MEMBER: Kevin Albrecht SPECIALIST: Wildlife IDT MEMBER: Diane Cote SPECIALIST: Silvaculture IDT MEMBER: Robert Davidson SPECIALIST: Soils IDT MEMBER: Daniel Luke SPECIALIST: Engineering IDT MEMBER: Sara Stauffer SPECIALIST: Archaelogy Possible Resource Areas: Archaeology Fuels/Fire Public Safety Soils Water Rights Botany Noxious Weeds/Invasive Range Hydrology Species Engineering Minerals Recreation Wildlife Manti-La Sal National Forest Page 19 Revised Oct 2010
DECISION MEMO. Vipond Water Development
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Wise River Ranger District Beaverhead County T2S, R10W, Sections 12, 13, 14, &18 Background This project is located in the Pioneer Landscape, East Face Management
More informationRECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION
RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION CX Log #: OR-014-CX-03-02 Lease or Serial #: OR 58195 Project Name: Peetsch Mineral Material Sale Applicant: Doug Peetsch Location:
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationDecision Memo. Delta A Septic Repair (#33)
Decision Memo Delta A Septic Repair (#33) USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District T16S, R5E, Section 16 Lane County, OR Proposed Action The McKenzie River Ranger District
More informationDECISION MEMO. Crow Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W in Section 35 Background A perennial cattle crossing on Crow Creek in in the Gravelly Landscape in the Centennial
More informationRECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM) CX Log #: OR-014-CX-05-30 Lease or Serial #: N/A Project Name: _Gerber Guard Station Fence Replacement
More informationDecision Memo. USDA Forest Service Mountain Home Ranger District, Boise National Forest Boise County, Idaho
Decision Memo BOGUS CREEK OUTFITTERS SPECIAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL USDA Forest Service Mountain Home Ranger District, Boise National Forest Boise County, Idaho August 2014 DECISION It is my decision to renew
More informationPinecrest Amphitheater Movies Special Use Permit (40431) Decision Memo
Decision Memo Stanislaus National Forest Summit Ranger District Tuolumne County, CA This decision memo provides documentation, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), related to the Pinecrest
More informationDECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT
DECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT USDA Forest Service Bend/Fort Rock Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Deschutes County, Oregon
More informationRECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION
RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION CX Log #: OR-014-CX-04-24 Lease or Serial #: N/A Project Name: Surveyor Salvage CX Location: T.38S., R.5E., Sections 25,26,35,36;
More informationDecision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project
Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Fremont-Winema National Forests Lakeview Ranger District Lake County, Oregon Introduction The Lakeview
More informationMANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST
MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MOAB / MONTICELLO RANGER DISTRICT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW FILE NUMBER: 1950 / 2700 / MOA1601 PROJECT TITLE: Emery Telcom Bald Mesa Fiber Line Project PROJECT LEAD: Anita
More informationDraft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project
Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, OR T13S, R7E, Sections 25 and 34 Willamette Meridian
More informationRECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION
RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION CX Log #: OR-014-CX-06-06 Lease or Serial #: OR62919 Project Name: _PacifiCorp Power-line right-of-way #2 Location: Bonanza USGS
More informationDECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County The Lazyman Repeater was installed in 1988 and serves parts
More informationDraft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension
Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Linn County, OR T.13 S., R.7 E., Section 14,
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationDECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)
DECISION MEMO Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118 MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118) USDA Forest Service - Lolo National Forest Missoula Ranger District
More informationDECISION MEMO FOR USDA FOREST SERVICE DAKOTA PRAIRIE GRASSLANDS LITTLE MISSOURI NATIONAL GRASSLAND MEDORA RANGER DISTRICT SLOPE COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA
DECISION MEMO FOR TWO (2) MEDORA RANGER DISTIRICT RANGE WATER PROJECTS ON ALLOTMENTS 023 AND 037 RANGE WATER STOCK TANKS AND PIPELINES AND RECLAIM and FENCE OUT DAMS USDA FOREST SERVICE DAKOTA PRAIRIE
More informationDECISION MEMO Pony Whitebark Pine Planting
Page 1 of 5 DECISION MEMO Pony Whitebark Pine Planting USDA Forest Service Jefferson Ranger District Madison County T2S, R3W, Sections 4 & 9 Background The Pony Fire of 2012 burned 5,157 acres on the (BDNF).
More informationBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District 5 Forest Service Road Ennis, MT 59729 406 682-4253 File Code: 1950 Date: April 19, 2013
More informationDECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS USDA-Forest Service, Eastern Region Huron-Manistee National Forests, Baldwin/White Cloud Ranger District Newaygo County, Michigan
More informationDecision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Decision Memo Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines Coconino National Forest Coconino, Gila,
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project
Preliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon The Crescent Ranger
More informationScoping and 30-Day Notice and Comment Period for. Grassy Knob American Chestnut Planting
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 Phone (304) 456-3335 File Code: 2020/2070/1950 Date: November 15, 2012
More informationDecision Memo Starkey Elk Handling Facility Water System Improvements
Decision Memo Starkey Elk Handling Facility Water System Improvements USDA Forest Service Wallowa-Whitman National Forest La Grande Ranger District Union County, Oregon I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A.
More informationDECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36 Northwestern Energy operates utility systems and facilities on federal lands under a Master
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs
Preliminary Decision Memo 2014 Recreation Residence Septic Repairs USDA Forest Service McKenzie River Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane County, Oregon T. 16 S., R. 5 E, Section 16 Willamette
More informationI. Decision to be Implemented. II. Reasons for Categorically Excluding the Decision. A. Description of Decision - 1 -
Decision Memo Guitonville Penelec Power Line Right-of-Way Special Use Permit USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 9 Allegheny National Forest Marienville Ranger District Warrant 5133, Green Township Forest
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationUSDA Forest Service Decision Memo. Mattie V Creek Minesite Rehabilitation Project
USDA Forest Service Decision Memo Mattie V Creek Minesite Rehabilitation Project Ninemile Ranger District Lolo National Forest Mineral County, Montana I. DECISION TO BE IMPLEMENTED A. Decision Description:
More informationMokelumne Coast to Crest Trail Mosquito Lakes to Pacific Valley Trail Construction (42414) Decision Memo
Mokelumne Coast to Crest Trail Mosquito Lakes to Pacific Valley Trail Construction (42414) Decision Memo Stanislaus National Forest Calaveras Ranger District Alpine County, CA This decision memo provides
More informationDecision Memo. North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project
Project Description Decision Memo North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Newport-Sullivan Lake Ranger Districts Colville National Forest Pend Oreille County, Washington Surveys
More informationCoronado National Forest Sierra Vista Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Sierra Vista Ranger District 4070 South Avenida Saracino Hereford, Arizona 85615 Phone (520) 378-0311 FAX (520) 378-0519
More informationKeefer Pasture Drift Fence Project. Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest
Keefer Pasture Drift Fence Project Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District Salmon-Challis National Forest PROPOSED ACTION The Challis-Yankee Fork Ranger District proposes construction of approximately.11 miles
More informationPROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe
PROPOSED ACTION Cooperative Horse Removal with Fort McDermitt Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Proposed Action The Santa Rosa Ranger District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove all unauthorized
More informationDecision Memo Raptor 1 and 9 Prescribed Burns Project
Decision Memo Raptor 1 and 9 Prescribed Burns Project USDA Forest Service Chemult Ranger District, Fremont-Winema National Forests Klamath County, OR Township (T) 29 South (S), Range (R) 6 East (E), Section
More informationPLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
PLAN CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is a Categorical Exclusion? Categorical exclusions are an essential part of NEPA that provide a categorical determination, based on agency experience,
More informationThe location of the valve site is displayed on a map in the project file.
DECISION MEMO Special Use Permit # RAR401201 Amendment #7 Hiawatha National Forest Rapid River Ranger District Delta County, Michigan I DECISION A. Description My decision is to issue an amendment to the
More informationDECISION MEMO ROSS FORK/BITTERROOT DIVIDE TRAILS REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION
Page 1 of 6 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO ROSS FORK/BITTERROOT DIVIDE TRAILS REHABILITATION AND RELOCATION USDA Forest Service Pintler Ranger District Granite County, Montana The purpose of this project is
More informationBLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #:
Decision Memorandum on Action and for Application of: Categorical Exclusion 516 DM2, Appendix 1, 1.12 Hazardous Fuel Reduction (PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION) CX Log #: CX-04-17
More informationDECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008
DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008 USDA Forest Service, Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River Ranger District Hood River County, Oregon Flooding in the fall of 2006 caused significant
More informationFINAL DECISION MEMO. Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery Rearing Pond Replacement
USDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest Sisters Ranger District FINAL DECISION MEMO Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery Rearing Pond Replacement Jefferson County, Oregon SW1/4SW1/4, Sec 14; NE1/4NE1/4, Sec
More informationSHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL
DRAFT DECISION MEMO SHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE TOWNSHIP 40, 41, 42 AND 43 NORTH, RANGE 1, 2, 3 WEST,
More informationDECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho
DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision II. I have decided to authorize issuance of
More informationMeacham Creek Restoration Project
Meacham Creek Restoration Project Meacham Creek Restoration Project Umatilla National Forest Walla Walla Ranger District Michael Rassbach, District Ranger Public Scoping Document Proposal Summary The Walla
More informationKENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION TOWER REPLACEMENT DECISION MEMO
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST KENTUCKY MARCH 2016 KENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION
More informationDECISION MEMO. Cheat-Potomac Ranger District Multiple Recreation Facilities and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Special Use Permit
DECISION MEMO Cheat-Potomac Ranger District Multiple Recreation Facilities and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Special Use Permit United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service (FS) Eastern Region
More informationClear Addition Project Decision Memo January 2013 DECISION MEMO. Clear Addition Fuels Reduction and Aspen Enhancement Project
DECISION MEMO Clear Addition Fuels Reduction and Aspen Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Carson Ranger District Douglas County and Carson City, Nevada I. PROJECT
More informationWildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project Umpqua National Forest Diamond Lake Ranger District April 2008
More informationDecision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute
Decision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane County, OR T.25S, R.5.5E, Section 22, Willamette Meridian Purpose and Need The
More informationXTO Energy Inc. Maranon #H1 and Orinoco #B1 Gas Well
DECISION MEMO XTO Energy Inc. Maranon #H1 and Orinoco #B1 Gas Well National Forest & Grasslands in Texas Sabine National Forest Angelina/Sabine Ranger District Shelby County, Texas DECISION I have decided
More informationDECISION MEMO ISSUE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT
DECISION MEMO ISSUE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT HIGH WEST ENERGY, INC. For A Single-Phase (2-Wire), Overhead Power Line US FOREST SERVICE Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests and Pawnee
More informationDECISION MEMO. Special Use Permit for Concession Management of Campgrounds and Other Developed Recreation Sites. Los Padres National Forest
INTRODUCTION DECISION MEMO Special Use Permit for Concession Management of Campgrounds and Other Developed Recreation Sites Los Padres National Forest Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura,
More informationAPPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist
APPENDI A NEPA Assessment Checklist NEPA CHECKLIST DATE: January 12, 2009 PREPARER: Frederick Wells, RLA PIN and Project Title: Surplus Property Request Wilder Balter Partners Marketplace Town of Newburgh,
More informationDECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit
DECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit I. DECISION USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Hoosier National Forest Tell City Ranger District Perry County, Indiana T73S, R2W, SESE Section 36 A. Description
More informationDecision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements
Decision Memo Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements USDA Forest Service Ocoee/ Hiwassee Ranger District, Cherokee National Forest Polk County, Tennessee Section 18, Township 2, Range 3 East; Lot
More informationParadise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)
Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page) T 34 S, R 15 E, Sections 11, 13 and 14 The purpose of the project would be to stabilize the stream channel by treating headcuts
More informationDecision Memo Halliburton Ann Exploration Project U.S. Forest Service Austin Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada
Decision Memo Halliburton Ann Exploration Project U.S. Forest Service Austin Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada Background The Ann Exploration Project is located on the
More informationBackground. Purpose and Need. Proposal. Mitigation and Design Features
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District 5 Forest Service Rd Ennis, MT 59729 406 682-4253 File Code: 1950 Date: November 20, 2013
More informationDECISION MEMO FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HOLY JIM CREEK CROSSING REPLACEMENT
DECISION MEMO FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HOLY JIM CREEK CROSSING REPLACEMENT U.S.D.A. Forest Service Cleveland National Forest Trabuco Ranger District Orange County, California Background The current configuration
More informationINTRODUCTION DECISION
DRAFT DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT BIG SHEEP DIVIDE RANGELAND ANALYSIS U.S. FOREST SERVICE WALLOWA VALLEY RANGER DISTRICT WALLOWA COUNTY, OREGON INTRODUCTION An Environmental Assessment
More informationDECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT
DECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT USDA, FOREST SERVICE GRAND RIVER NATIONAL GRASSLAND GRAND RIVER RANGER DISTRICT INTRODUCTION: West River Cooperative
More informationBACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6
BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO HOUSE ROCK WILDLIFE AREA PASTURE FENCE USDA FOREST SERVICE, SOUTHWEST REGION (R3) KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST - NORTH KAIBAB RANGER DISTRICT COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA The Kaibab National
More informationDecision Memo for Juniper Ridge Opal Mine
for USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Fremont-Winema National Forests Bly Ranger District Klamath County, Oregon Introduction The Bly Ranger District has received a proposed operating plan for
More informationDECISION MEMO. East Fork Blacktail Trail Reroute
Page 1 of 6 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County Background The East Fork Blacktail Trail #6069 is a mainline trail in the Snowcrest Mountains. The Two Meadows Trail
More informationDECISION MEMO. Aurora New Horizons Project
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County In 2005 a decision covering approximately the same proposal was analyzed and a Decision Memo was signed.
More informationForest Plan Amendment to Remove the Layng Creek Municipal Watershed Management Plan
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Plan Amendment to Remove the Layng Creek Municipal Watershed Management Plan Draft Decision Memo Umpqua National Forest Cottage Grove Ranger
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2009 Environmental Assessment Powder River Campground Decommissioning Powder River Ranger District, Bighorn National Forest Johnson and Washakie
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project The USDA Forest Service (USFS) has initiated an environmental analysis process for the proposed Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project
More informationDECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 7 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Dillon Ranger District Beaverhead County The project area is included in the Ermont Mining District in T5S R11W Section 36 and T6S R11W Section
More informationDecision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project
Decision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District Willamette National Forest Marion and Linn Counties, OR T.10S., R.5 E., Section 2, Willamette
More informationDecision Memo Special Forest Products Sales. USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest Marion & Linn County, Oregon
Decision Memo Special Forest Products Sales USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest Marion & Linn County, Oregon 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Need... 3 2. Proposed
More informationDECISION MEMO USDA FOREST SERVICE
DECISION MEMO USDA FOREST SERVICE Eagle River-Florence and Lakewood-Laona Ranger Districts Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Florence, Forest, Langlade, Oconto, Oneida, and Vilas Counties, Wisconsin
More informationFinal Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District
Final Decision Memo Murphy Meadow Restoration Project USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District T19S, R5E, Sec. 23, 24. Lane County Oregon BACKGROUND The Murphy Meadow
More informationDECISION MEMO PROJECT NAME: CLARK CREEK BLOWDOWN USDA FOREST SERVICE IDAHO PANHANDLE NATIONAL FOREST BONNERS FERRY RANGER DISTRICT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Idaho Panhandle National Forests Bonners Ferry Ranger District 6286 Main Street Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 (208) 267-5561 File Code: 1950 Date: July
More informationMichigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol
DECISION MEMO Michigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol (CAP) Navigational Equipment Special Use Permit #MUN250 Hiawatha National Forest Munising Ranger District Alger County, Michigan I DECISION A. Description My
More informationDECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD PERMIT
DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD PERMIT USDA-Forest Service, Eastern Region Huron-Manistee National Forests, Baldwin Ranger District Newaygo County, Michigan I. DECISION A. Background
More informationDECISION MEMO WELDON MEADOW MINE RECLAMATION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE, SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT KERN COUNTY, CA
,,-:=e - a BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO WELDON MEADOW MINE RECLAMATION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE, SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT KERN COUNTY, CA The Kern River Ranger District of the
More informationDECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline
DECISION MEMO Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline USDA, Forest Service Cibola National Forest, Black Kettle National Grasslands Roger Mills County, Oklahoma BACKGROUND: Laredo Petroleum, Inc., in order
More informationDECISION MEMO LOWER STILLWATER FISHERY ENHANCEMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DUCHESNE RANGER DISTRICT ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH
DECISION MEMO LOWER STILLWATER FISHERY ENHANCEMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DUCHESNE RANGER DISTRICT ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH BACKGROUND The Rock Creek drainage is a very popular recreation
More informationDecision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project
Decision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project USDA Forest Service Mount Hough and Beckwourth Ranger Districts Plumas County, CA Background We, (the USDA Forest
More informationNOAA s NEPA Checklist Categorical Exclusion Checklist for Non-Construction National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Grants
NOAA s NEPA Checklist Categorical Exclusion Checklist for Non-Construction National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Grants The purpose of this checklist is to assist National Oceanic and Atmospheric
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationDECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO
DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO Background and Project Description In order to improve forest health and reduce hazardous
More informationDECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )
Background DECISION MEMO Griz Thin (Stand 507089) USDA Forest Service Siuslaw National Forest Central Coast Ranger District Lane County, Oregon Township 16 South, Range 10 West, Sections 6 and 7 The Cummins-Tenmile
More informationBlanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Blanche Park Reservoir Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Delta County, Colorado INTRODUCTION The Grand Mesa
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SALEM DISTRICT OFFICE Marys Peak Resource Area Lincoln County, Oregon CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION REVIEW - NEPA COMPLIANCE RECORD Project: Miami Corporation
More informationI. DECISION. A. Description of Decision
DECISION MEMO Southern Indiana Power Oriental Road USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Hoosier National Forest Tell City Ranger District Perry County, Indiana I. DECISION A. Description of Decision My
More informationOn/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards
DECISION NOTICE HENRY CREEK AND SWAMP CREEK RANGE ALLOTMENT MANAGEMENT PLANS REVISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE PLAINS/THOMPSON FALLS RANGER DISTRICT LOLO NATIONAL FOREST SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA DECISION Based
More informationDecision Memo North Boundary Salvage
Map # Proposal and Need for the Proposal Decision Memo North Boundary Salvage USDA Forest Service Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Medford-Park Falls Ranger District The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) is
More informationBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Pintler Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Pintler Ranger District 88 Business Loop Philipsburg, MT 59858 406 859-3211 File Code: 1920 Date: April 20, 2012
More informationDECISION MEMO. Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY
DECISION MEMO Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY 2007-2013 USDA Forest Service Bankhead National Forest - National Forests in Alabama Winston
More informationNEPA: Analyzing Impacts (# ) Lesson 3 Determining Significance
NEPA: Analyzing Impacts (#1620-10) Lesson 3 Objectives: Determine severity or intensity of an impact by considering one or more factors. Determine context of an impact by comparing it to the existing environment.
More informationDecision Memo Cow Pen Project. USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama
Decision Memo Cow Pen Project USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama Decision and Rationale I have decided to implement the actions listed
More informationWetland Creation Project. Decision Memo
Wetland Creation Project UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Eastern REGION Monongahela NATIONAL FOREST West Virginia Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Monongahela National
More informationDECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA
DECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA Forest Service, Northern Region North Fork Ranger District, Clearwater National Forest Clearwater County, Idaho I. Decision I have decided to authorize
More informationAn Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process
Introduction This document provides a brief overview of the policy and procedures that govern the environmental evaluation process that the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) must follow for
More informationProposed Action and Alternatives
Chapter Proposed Action and Alternatives Page 15 CHAPTER 2 - PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES INTRODUCTION Chapter 2 describes and compares the Southwest Fence Relocation and Waterline Project s Proposed
More information