SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

Similar documents
Catalytic Activated Ceramic Dust Filter a new technology for combined removal of dust, NOx, dioxin, VOCs and acids from off gases.

Meeting New Environment Norms - Challenges and Possibilities. Presented by: A.K.Sinha General Manager NTPC Limited

TruePeak TDLS200. NH 3 Slip Measurement. <Document Number> Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation <date/time>

POWER PLANT AIR QUALITY CONTROL and FLY ASH QUALITY & AVAILABILITY

Diode laser analyser LS4000 Ammonia slip measurement for DeNOx process

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial Coal-Fired Boilers

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

SCR RETROFIT FOR NO X REDUCTION EXPERIENCES IN CHINA & POLAND TWO COUNTRIES WITH COAL AS DOMINATING FUEL SOURCE

Controlling NOx and other Engine Emissions

Mercury Measurement and Control

Emissions Calculations - Stack

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION

Topsoe s Emission Management Solution--DeNOx

Gas Cleaning by SCR and ESP

SCR and Zero-Slip TM Technology

LICONOX Linde s new technology for removal of NOx and SOx integrated in the CO 2 processing unit

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

The Future of Coal Ash

Can your unit pass a Particulate Emission Compliance Test?

CEMS for Measurement of Ammonia, SO 3, and Low Level NOx

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

Optimal Design and Operation of SNCR System for a 150t/h CFB Boiler and Discussion on the Measurement of Flue Gas Components

WHITE PLUME REMOVAL USING FUEL ADDITIVES IN THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Static Mixing, Reaction, Heat Transfer & Fluid Dynamics Technology

Controlling Ammonia-in-Ash through Direct Measurement of Ammonium Bisulfate

Sulfuric Acid Mist Generation in Utility Boiler Flue Gas

MerSim TM Mercury Model. Abstract. Introduction. Mercury Control Strategies

GE solutions for NOx compliance and increased availability for WtE / Biomass plants

LIMESTONE INJECTION FOR PROTECTION OF SCR CATALYST

Biomass Boiler Emission Abatement Technologies. Simon Wakefield

PM Compliance Options for MACT and MATS Rules. Ed McCall PCME

Emission Challenges in Cement Making due to alternative Fuels

NO x Control. Decision Guide Webinar

Coal Fired Boiler Optimization and the Impact on Emission Control Devices

PPC specializes in maximum efficiency air pollution control equipment using a variety of different

Particulate and Opacity Control - Program 76

Fully Extractive Vs. Dilution Extractive CEMS

NTPC O&M Conference Performance and Optimization of Water Utilisation Increase of Existing Power Plants. Speaker Name; Tufani Ram 13-14/02/2013

Panel II Jänschwalde Oxyfuel demonstartion plant.

YARA Environmental Technologies GmbH

The choice for innovative flue gas treatment. Sorbacal SPS, the most effective calcium sorbent on the market

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Description of different technologies and their development potentials for reducing nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas from waste incineration plants

Bromine Derivative Benefits for Mercury Emissions Reduction

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

8 th SGC International Seminar on Gasificaton October 15 th -16 th, 2014 Malmö, Sweden

Efficiency Increase of Secondary DeNOx Systems for Cleaning of Flue Gas Produced in Combustion Processes

Tailor-made SNCR to Meet Future Emission Standards for Power Boilers

Halogens, dioxins/furans

Options for PM, Dioxin/Furan and Mercury Control Using eptfe Technologies

NOx abatement in Swedish large and medium sized combustion plants - fuelled with biomass, - or used for co-incineration for energy production

Fundamental oxy-fuel combustion research carried out within the ENCAP project

Fuel Quality and MATS for Coal- Fired Plants: The Ripple Effect

A GLOBAL PIONEER IN INNOVATIVE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

ENCAP SP4 Chemical looping combustion

Steinmüller Engineering Conference Modernization and Optimization of Flue Gas Cleaning Plants

Controlling Emissions and Saving Money with Highly Engineered Cartridge Filter Technology

MIT Carbon Sequestration Forum VII Pathways to Lower Capture Costs

Mercury Control in North America Using Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC)

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

ECOPURE CATALYTIC CANDLE FILTER THE NEW ALTERNATIVE FOR FLUE GAS TREATMENT

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

BAG FILTERS (BAGHOUSES)

State of the art CFB technology for flexible large scale utility power production

Emissions of Sulfur Trioxide from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Emission Control for Gas Turbines

Integrated Environmental Controls - Program 75

Determining SCR Reactor Potential In situ Paper # 17

STUDY OF MERCURY OXIDATION BY SCR CATALYST IN AN ENTRAINED-FLOW REACTOR UNDER SIMULATED PRB CONDITIONS

Prediction Hg Removals With Activated Carbon Injection in Utility Gas Cleaning Systems

Adoption of USC CFB Technology to Achieving Lower Cost Generation and Environmental Sustainability. Gerd Heiermann & Douglas Spalding

Cansolv Technologies Inc. Alberta NOx and SOx Control Technologies Symposium April 9, Rick Birnbaum

FACT SHEET. Whelan Energy Center 4520 East South Street Hastings, Nebraska March 26, 2004

Sustainable, Clean Energy from Waste

Retrofit of Rodenhuize 4 power station: The Max Green and Cold Back-up-projects

ICAC Forum On-Line LOI Analyzers for NO x and Mercury Control

Operating Experience of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology in Utility Size Power Plants

Novel types of equipment for off-gas cleaning

NOx processing experiences for removal in the CO 2 plant for the Oxyfuel combustion process

LARGE-SCALE MERCURY CONTROL TECHNOLOGY TESTING FOR LIGNITE-FIRED UTILITIES OXIDATION SYSTEMS FOR WET FGD

Hot Gas Filters for Control of Emissions to Atmosphere

Dry Sorbent Injection - Sodium

Purification of Oxyfuel- Derived CO 2

Successful SO3 Mitigation While Enhancing the ESP Performance at AEP s Gavin Plant by Dry Injection of Trona Upstream of the ESP

CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED- FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION PROJECT NUMBER

WHITEPAPER: AMMONIA MEASUREMENT FOR COMBUSTION SOURCES

natcom burner solutions Advanced burner technology for stringent emissions requirements

Lünen State-of-the-Art 813MW Coal-Fired USC Boiler with High Efficiency and Flexibility

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Acoustic Cleaners vs. Steam Sootblowers:

Advances in Refined Coal Technology for Emissions Reduction

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Soda Ash & Derivatives

EPRI Electrostatic Precipitator Research. Bruce Scherer Program 76, Opacity & Particulate Control Project Manager

High efficient multi-fuel CYMIC concept for biomass, rejects and coal for Hamburger Hungaria Katriina Jalkanen Valmet Technologies Oy

Potentials and Limitations with respect to NO x -Reduction of Coke Plants

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

Andover Technology Partners

Transcription:

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants The McIlvaine Company April 7, 2011 Hot Topic Hour on New FGD and DeNOx Approaches Ken Jeffers Sr Applications Engineer

SCR Basics Quick Review Flue Gas: NOx, O2, SO2 NH 3 SCR = Selective Catalytic Reduction Purpose is to reduce NO x (NO & NO 2 ) from combustion exhaust Ammonia (NH 3 ) is injected into flue gas as reducing agent. Flue gas passes through catalyst layers installed in a reactor NH 3 reacts with NO x on the catalyst surface to form nitrogen and water vapor N2, H2O, O2, SO2(SO3) 4NO + 4NH 3 + O 2 Catalyst 4N 2 + 6H 2 O 2NO 2 + 4NH 3 + O 2 Catalyst 3N 2 + 6H 2 O

SCR Catalyst Types Plate-Type Ceramic material on SS substrate Individual flexible plates Rectangular flow channels Ideal for particulate-laden flue gas Honeycomb Homogenously extruded ceramic Rigid structure, square channels High cell density, high surface area Ideal for particulate-free flue gas

SCR Presence in the US Appeared in late 1980s / early 1990s Proven technology for achieving low NO x emission rates ~260 Utility coal-fired units with SCR (135,000 MW) 100s of combustion turbines (SC/CC) 1000s of stationary diesel engines Marine applications Off-road mobile applications On-road mobile applications

Traditional Approach for Coal-fired Applications High-dust SCR configuration (directly downstream of boiler outlet) Reactors with 2 or 3 initial catalyst layers, 1 or 2 empty spare layers 80-90% denox, emission rates < 0.05 lb/mbtu 2 ppm NH 3 slip at end of catalyst lifetime Catalyst management a major concern due to fly ash plugging and deactivation Frequent catalyst change-out, 2-3 years between additions/replacement Replacements with new, used, regenerated catalyst

New Approaches and Developments for SCR >90% denox with low NH 3 slip New applications Catalyst product improvement Hg oxidation, co-benefit

High denox, 90-95%+ Traditional approach for high denox over-injecting ammonia excess catalyst volume Trade-offs include higher cost and high ammonia slip Improve NH 3 -NO x mixing for low ammonia slip (< 2 ppm) NH 3 :NO X distribution 5% RMS typical for up to 90% denox For higher denox, NH 3 :NO X distribution 2.5% RMS Sophisticated flow modeling tools (CFD, physical) used for design Development of advanced NH 3 slip control catalysts High denox, low NH 3 slip Extend catalyst operating life

New SCR Applications SCR for US lignite-fired units High ash concentration, high alkali concentrations (K, Na) risk for fast catalyst deactivation, fouling First TX lignite-fired unit with SCR started in 2009 3 units now operating Investigating SCR for ND lignite firing Investigating use with cement kilns Produce high NO x High ash exhaust gas high risk for catalyst SCR would likely be in low-dust configuration, downstream of ESP or baghouse

Other Challenging SCR Applications Flue gas with particulate deactivates catalyst poisoning, fouling, erosion Biomass combustion high risk of poisoning by alkalis and phosphorus Waste (trash) combustion high risk of poisoning by heavy metals and acid gases Tail-end SCR configuration downstream of particulate collection Prevents fast catalyst deactivation High cell density/surface area catalyst, lower volume requirement Allows long catalyst lifetime, avoid frequent catalyst maintenance Trade-offs with Tail-end SCR Position where flue gas temperature is low Operating target of 400 540 F may require flue gas reheating Cost to install and operating flue gas reheating equipment

Tail-End SCR Boiler Economizer Heater Particulate Control SCR Heat Exchanger Scrubber Stack Typical configuration for European WTE plant SCR installations SCR after scrubber/particulate collection equipment Long catalyst life expected Special catalyst formulations for low temperature, 400 540 F Low concentrations of SO 2, SO 3 required

Continuous Catalyst Product Improvement High denox activity, low SO 2 oxidation activity reduce volume, cost Poison resistance extend catalyst life Special formulations for high temperature operation Low temperature operation Ammonia slip control extend catalyst life, achieve high denox rates Enhance Hg oxidation

Hg Oxidation, Hg 0 Hg 2+ Mercury emission control from Coal combustion Activated Carbon injection or other Novel sorbents Capture in wet FGD These methods work better on Hg 2+ Hg oxidation is a co-benefit of SCR catalyst Hg oxidation rate strongly dependent on Presence of halogens in flue gas Cl, Br Temperature, < 700 F Catalyst formulation and volume Catalysts being developed with enhanced Hg oxidation capability while preserving performance on denox and SO 2 oxidation

Thank You! Ken Jeffers Sr Applications Engineer ken.jeffers@jmusa.com 678.341.7523 Johnson Matthey Catalysts LLC 1121 Alderman Dr, Suite 204 Alpharetta, GA 30005