PORT INLAND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK SOUTH JERSEY SITE EVALUATION AND FEASIBILITY DEVELOPMENT STUDY. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2003

Similar documents
Delaware Valley Goods Movement Task Force SJ PIDN: Good Public Policy. Congestion Mitigation Economic Development Efficiency/Flexibility

Delaware Valley Goods. July 15, 2009

PORT OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY RAIL FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAM

Inland Port Cargo Complex

The Emergence of. Florida s Seaports and Inland Ports. Florida League of Cities - International Relations Committee November 17, 2011

NC State Ports Authority. 21 st Century Transportation Intermodal Committee February 21, 2008 NC State Ports Authority Tom Eagar, CEO

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Eric Thomas Benchmark River and Rail Terminals

Benefit Cost Analysis 2016 TIGER Grant Application Funding Opportunity #: DTOS59-16-RA-TIGER8

Southeast Florida Freight and Goods Movement Update Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council September 16, 2011

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

Delaware Valley Freight Planning

Maritime Administration

THE PORT OF VIRGINIA A CLEAR VISION. A PATH FORWARD. Stewards of Tomorrow 1

THE DYNAMICS OF THE US CONTAINER MARKET AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE US PORT INDUSTRY

New Jersey Department of Transportation. Local Freight Impact Fund Handbook. Procedures and Criteria for Local Freight Impact Fund Grant Program

CENTERPOINT V ±224,147 SF AVAILABLE FOR LEASE

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

Paul F. Richardson-Short-Sea Shipping Session. Marine Board Spring Meeting-May Short-Sea Shipping.

Inland Port Impact Study

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

Chapter 1 Introduction

House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation and Long Term Funding Solutions. November 6, 2017

Port of Los Angeles. America s Port Harbor Transportation Club June 20, 2013 Kathryn McDermott

New options for supply chain efficiency from Asia to the Americas

Port of Hamburg: Heading into the future with smartport

Shifting International Trade Routes

Alabama State Port Authority

LATTS II - Freight Investment Decision Principles

Freight Corridors: Changes and Challenges

Transport, Forwarding and Logistics in Poland. K e y n o t e s

United States Exporters Competitive Maritime Council (ECMC) WASHTO Committee on Highway Transport. Reno, Nevada October 21, 2010

2015 Strategic Plan of the. North Carolina State Ports Authority

Factors Affecting Transportation Decisions. Transportation in a Supply Chain. Transportation Modes. Road freight transport Europe

The Port of Savannah Logistics Cluster Author: Dr. Jean Paul Rodriguez

Empty Intermodal Container Management

NEW JERSEY STATE RAIL PLAN NJ TRANSIT New Jersey Department of Transportation

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

The EU funding emphasises the importance of bayernhafen Regensburg as a logistics hub in Europe

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

Terminal Opportunities & Challenges. Peter I. Keller NYK Line April 24, 2006

Eight County Freight Plan

Yuma Rail Corridor Study Preliminary List of Alternatives

Intermodal Facility Study

APPENDIX D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN

MoS: the paradigm for the development of modern ports

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

New Jersey Pilot Study

CLASS I RAIL CSX & Norfolk Southern

I know that you all understand the critical importance of the freight transportation system


CSUN RESEARCH TEAM Dr, Alireza Kabirian, Dr. S. JimmyGandhi, Dr. Emad Al-Wakil, Dr. Abhijit Mukherjee Dr. Rais Ahmed

Green ports policies, coastal shipping and inland waterways November, 2013 Incheon

Global trends in the logistics and shipping industry and its effects on the supply chain. Jordi Torrent Strategy Director

The Economic Impact of the New York-New Jersey Port Industry Report

America s Ports and Intermodal Transportation System. January U.S. Maritime Administration

Freight Transportation Megatrends

Intermodal Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Sites 9328

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

Anticipating Global Change

APPENDIX A: SHORT-TERM PROJECT DEPLOYMENTS

Ballard-Interbay MIC Summary Statistics

THE EVOLVING PANAMA CANAL ROUTE FOR CHEMICALS

Morris County Freight Profile

Port of Vancouver USA Clark College Business Advisory Committee May 9, 2017

International trade and freight by 2050

INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION: Our Competitive Advantage. Delbert R Wilkins Canal Barge Company Big River Moves Leadership Forum April 15, 2013

JOC s Inland Port s Session at TPM. Overview and Definition of Inland Ports.

Suez Canal. The Suez Canal Zone represents a new chapter in the economic development of

Centered on global trade.

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

PORT OF KASKINEN SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITY

Cool Logistics Asia. Lars Kastrup, Senior Vice President - Asia, CMA CGM September 2, 2015

INDUSTRIAL OUTPARCELS AVAILABLE WITH RAIL ACCESS BUILD TO SUIT OPTIONS. The Moser Group, Inc.

RDEIR/SDEIS Traffic Forecasting Key Assumptions Update

Waterways 1 Water Transportation History

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

EDPNC Remarks April 2, 2018

DCT Gdansk Presentation January 2017

Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

Formerly Paramount Logistics Park

Canaveral Port Authority: Rail Extension Update

The Delaware Valley Freight Center Inventory

ALABAMA S DISTRIBUTION, LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

D. Kim Beatley, P.E. Principal Norfolk, Virginia

PIANC. World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORT FLOWS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA: CONSEQUENCES FOR PORTS

Executive Summary October 2017

Intermodal Port Strategy AAPA Vancouver Conference November 6, 2013

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

By Captain John C. Farmer Presented to: Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization Technical Committee meeting January 10, 2017

Welcome to the presentation of

Port regionalization: improving port competitiveness by reaching beyond the port perimeter

The University of Georgia

Port of New Bedford. AAPA Commissioners Seminar May 17, 2011 Prosperity through Economic Development Opportunities

Airports Council International North America Air Cargo Conference Atlanta March 29, Alternative Land Use: The Airport Logistics Park

Partnerships in Capital Projects. AAPA Facilities Engineering Seminar and Expo

PPTA Project Pipeline

Transcription:

PORT INLAND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK SOUTH JERSEY SITE EVALUATION AND FEASIBILITY DEVELOPMENT STUDY NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2003 INTRODUCTION The volume of international containerized trade has steadily increased since its introduction over 40 years ago. Significant growth in container volumes through the Port of New York and New Jersey (PONY&NJ) has followed a similar trend and is projected to double by the year 2010. The significant growth in container volumes is due to a number of economic factors including the growth of global trade and a shifting of trade lanes from transpacific routes calling at U.S. west coast port facilities to a combination of all-water services via the Panama Canal and all-water services utilizing the Suez Canal, Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. Container volumes are a response to consumer demand in the region. PIDN CONCEPT In anticipation of this growth, a concept titled, Port Inland Distribution Network (PIDN) has been developed as one of the strategies designed to improve freight movements between the port and inland destinations. In addition to freight movement efficiencies and redundancy, public sector benefits that may also develop as part of a successful PIDN include congestion mitigation along particular roadway segments, new job generation, brownfield redevelopment, supply chain enhancement that could lead to cost reductions for local consumers, an increased tax base for local and state entities and an overall improvement in the competitive nature of a specific region. SOUTH JERSEY PIDN A South Jersey based PIDN (SJ-PIDN) service is currently being evaluated due to a combination of continued growth in regional consumer demand, the reliance on over-the-road truck haulage for inland transport, and increasing congestion along major interstates and local connector highways. If roadway or highway congestion is left unchecked throughout New Jersey, significant negative impacts to economic growth and regional air quality may result. A SJ-PIDN offers the potential to relieve some of the congestion along the NJ Turnpike corridor by increasing transportation s modal split for containers destined to inland locations through the use of a two-way feeder barge or line-haul rail service that directly connects the PONY&NJ with a South Jersey container facility. In addition, a successful feeder service could act as a catalyst for the creation of economic development opportunities through the combination of industrial, trade, service and logistic programs on a single site, where each business element benefits from the capabilities of other elements. Feeder Barge Service Line-Haul Rail Service 1

STUDY PURPOSE The purpose of the South Jersey Site Evaluation and Feasibility Development Study was to: (a) evaluate the potential to accommodate PIDN developments at five (5) prospective sites: Camden, Gloucester City, Paulsboro, Pennsville and Port Salem, (b) to recommend which sites, if any, should be considered as potentially viable inland distribution locations, and (c) to explore the potential for value added development around the PIDN or feeder port locations. The Study was intended to assist decision makers in evaluating the merits of supporting PIDN development and to specify appropriate Next Steps if one or more PIDNs in South Jersey are feasible. SITE EVALUATION The following Site Criteria Matrix provides a summary comparison of each potential South Jersey site location. Based on on-site and off-site characteristics, such as barge and/or rail travel time from the PONY&NJ, sufficient water depth along the existing berth, available and adequate wharf infrastructure, proximity to upland terminal acreage, existing and condition of warehouse facilities, existing rail capability and proximity of interstate highway access, the Camden and Salem facilities are recommended herein for further consideration regarding the potential feasibility of establishing a viable inland distribution network via the PONY&NJ. COMPARISON OF FIVE SOUTH JERSEY POTENTIAL PIDN SITES SITE / CRITERIA Barge Travel Time to PANYNJ Berth Water depth Berth Length Proxmity to Container Yard Cost to Develop Container Yard Available Warehouse S.F. Broadway Terminal O + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Y Salem + + + + + + + + O + + + O O + Y Gloucester Point O - + + - - - - - + - - - O O N BP Paulsboro O + - + - - - - + + - - + O - N Deepwater Dupont O + - O - - - - - + - - - O O N SITE SELECTION Based on origin and destination data derived in the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey s (PANY&NJ) - PIDN analyses, it was determined that in 1998/99, the overall market for the Southeastern Pennsylvania and South Jersey region represented nearly half a million TEUs (i.e. 358,200 TEU of imports and 137,400 TEU of exports a TEU is an internationally recognized unit of measure and equates to one twenty foot equivalent unit ). For the purposes of the SJ-PIDN analysis, the potential market is considered to be located within a 20-mile radius of a designated PIDN node. Predicated on a New Jersey only market, centered on Camden, a target market of approximately 280,000 TEUs is generated. The 20-mile roundtrip distance is Available Container Handling Equipmenrt Established Maritime Labor Local Connector Access Route Interstate Highway Access Early Service Commencement Access to Public Funding On-Facility Rail Service Rail Travel Time to PANYNJ Compatibility with Existing Operation Further Consideration 2

utilized in order to minimize final over-the-road drayage operations, thereby maximizing the number of deliveries a trucker can make in one day while also minimizing per TEU drayage costs. In a similar fashion, the potential market located within a 20- mile radius, centered on Salem, generates a target market of only 12,000 TEU. Based on this analysis, the potential 20-mile market available to a Salem Terminal is less than 5% of the potential market for a Camden Terminal. Due to the significant decrease in Salem s potential 20-mile market demand, it is recommended that a Salem based PIDN location be considered as a secondary alternative or potential add on service offering to a successful Camden based SJ-PIDN operation. Specifically, the current lack of market demand for containerized freight within close proximity to the Salem Terminal will require longer final over-the-road drayage distances (i.e. to the north where population densities and current industries exist), thereby negatively impacting the cost effectiveness of a Salem-only based PIDN feeder service. Based on the geographical distribution of Camden s 20-mile market, combined with the fact that nearly 50% of this market moves via the PONY&NJ, a total SJ-PIDN Year 1 Start-Up volume of 140,000 TEU through a Camden Terminal is possible. Predicated on a medium capture rate (20%) of containers currently moving through the PONY&NJ, it is estimated that a start-up volume of 28,000 TEUs annually, or approximately 16,500 boxes is feasible. From a qualitative standpoint, the start-up service volume is predicated on handling one out of every four import containers that currently move via truck from the PONYNJ to a destination within a 10- mile radius of a Camden terminal. Furthermore, if a 4% annual growth rate is utilized, the start-up service volume could increase to nearly 40,000 TEUs, or approximately 25,000 boxes, by the end of the fifth year, further increasing to nearly 60,000 TEUs, or approximately 35,000 boxes, by the end of the tenth year. RECOMMENDATIONS Implementing a cost competitive feeder service for containers, utilizing either barge or rail transport, will be a challenging endeavor that will require a combination of an effective transportation solution integrated with a successful value-added warehouse and distribution program. The difficult cost competitive transport situation is the result of either the extensive barge sailing time of roughly 3 days per roundtrip, or the circuitous and congested rail route between North and South Jersey. An operating cost comparison indicates that the existing overthe-road truck movement is the most cost-effective transport mode. This cost analysis compares the total cost of handling and transporting one container via truck, barge or rail. But if a feeder service is able to modify the current supply chain process by (1) achieving economies of scale from operating at high equipment utilization ratios (i.e. handling 200 containers per one-way barge or rail move), (2) capturing a significant number of over-weight containers, (i.e. containers in excess of the over-the-road weight restrictions 40,000 lbs or 20 tons/load) and (3) combine the feeder service with on-terminal value-added warehouse, distribution and anchor tenant activities, a SJ-PIDN service via Camden is likely to provide a feasible alternative to over-the-road transport. In addition to the potential to achieve a cost-effective transport alternative to over-the-road trucking, which would utilize mode shift to benefit regional users through the optimization of existing roadway capacity, reduce roadway maintenance 3

requirements and potentially enhance air quality, the feeder service can complement local smart growth initiatives and generate economic development. Two specific value-added or anchor tenant concepts are possible: (1) a Food Distribution PIDN and/or (2) a Retail-Oriented PIDN. Both value-added concepts support cargo transport, local and community focused economic development, fit surrounding uses and policies, and are predicated on achieving financial self-sufficiency. For example, the Food Distribution PIDN would combine the flow of food and beverage products from overseas with locally produced goods and raised products. In so doing, the complex could be integrated with existing port operations in New Jersey, Philadelphia and Wilmington, Delaware, as well as with the concentration of farms in the middle and southern regions of New Jersey. The demand for these products comes from the major markets for food purchases in the vicinity of the proposed site in Camden. Atlantic City, Cape May, Philadelphia and areas of New York New Jersey (via back-haul transport) are within the market area of a Camden site. The agglomeration and variety of products that would be offered at the site would be designed to attract the attention of restaurants, specialty stores and food markets in the area. A series of Next Steps have been developed in order to refine the economic considerations and potential for economic viability. The Next Steps include: Establish public partner(s), Confirm terminal availability, labor relationships, service offerings and capability to provide costeffective SJ-PIDN operations, Work with the local community to identify and incorporate specific concerns and ideas, Identify specific throughput source(s) such as shippers, trucking companies and shipping lines, and refine the boundaries of the SJ-PIDN geographically, Based on the specific throughput, geographical boundaries and community issues, develop environmental benefits such as reduced over-the-road drayage requirements, corresponding air quality benefits and reduced roadway maintenance provisions, Predicated on the defined public partners, terminal selection and throughput volume, establish preliminary public sector financial sources including federal, state and local entities, Based on the defined financial sources, establish preliminary financial uses including infrastructure development, capital equipment purchases and operational considerations, Identify specific value-added anchor tenant(s) and other business requirements, such as synergistic partnerships with Pennsylvania and Delaware, as well as back-haul opportunities that will be critical to the viability of the SJ PIDN feeder service, Enhance economic development opportunities for local and regional communities, and plan for SJ-PIDN related programs including job-training, educationinternship opportunities, and transportation options. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The South Jersey Site Evaluation and Feasibility Study was conducted in cooperation with the following Steering Committee Members: DVRPC, NJDOT, DRPA, SJPC, SJTPO, PANY&NJ and other city, county and regional stakeholders. Potential PIDN Container Handling Process 4

5