Performance Standards for Target Hydrology

Similar documents
d. Estimated potential indirect impacts to ombrotrophic bog communities due to proposed mine dewatering should not be rated as no effect.

Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Hydrologic Assessments of Potential Wetland Sites

7.6 Wetlands, Riparian and Littoral Habitats

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Water Quality Protection. Design Criteria - Wetlands Replacement/Monitoring

Municipal Stadium Wetland

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

WETLANDS AND OPEN WATERS Compensatory Mitigation Definitions of Factors

Wetlands Project Guidance

Water Table Monitoring Project Design

HYDRIC SOILS. By Neal Svendsen Resource Soil Scientist Natural Resources Conservation Service Sept 2006

An Explanation of the Hydric Soil Technical Standard and Normal Precipitation

G.B. Sonny Hall, PhD. Veronika Thiebach

Wetland and Stream Functional Assessment in North Carolina- A New Regulatory World?

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR TIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS. October 28, 2016

Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Criteria for the Creation and Restoration of Wetlands

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

Wetlands in Alberta: Challenges and Opportunities. David Locky, PhD, PWS, PBiol Grant MacEwan University

Public Notice ISSUED: June 29, 2017 EXPIRES: July 31, 2017

VIDEO: Freshwater Wetlands

PART I: ASSESSMENT OF WETLAND HYDROLOGY AT RESTORATION SITES PART II: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON WETLAND HYDROLOGY BOUNDARIES. Mike Vepraskas NC State

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Management Plans

Biogeochemistry of Wetlands: Wetland hydrology

Information for File # PRH

Public Notice ISSUED: August 11, 2015 EXPIRES: September 10, 2015

Nantahala Pisgah NF Plan Process - Natural Range of Variation. Gary Kauffman National Forests in NC Ecologist

Department of the Army Permit Application

NJDEP Regulations that impact or soon will impact agricultural operations. April 1, 2007 Horses 2007

Wetland Animals. Grade Level: Basic or intermediate. Duration: 30 minutes 1 hour. Setting: Classroom

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

BIOMES. Living World

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

Surface Water and Non-Wetland Surface Waters Delineation and Classification pursuant Chapter F.A.C.

Climate: describes the average condition, including temperature and precipitation, over long periods in a given area

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Virginia and North Carolina (Section 216)

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AND THE MITIGATION RULE. USACE, Jacksonville District

Feasibility Report with Integrated Environmental Assessment Rip Rap Landing HREP APPENDIX M MONITORING & ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Hubbard Lake State Game Area Master Plan

Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

Examples of Performance Standards for Wetland Creation and Restoration in Section 404 Permits and an Approach to Developing Performance Standards

I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST WET LAND: A GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING FOR AIRPORTS ROAD SCHOOL 2018 SIMON DAVIES, SENIOR SCIENTIST MARCH 7, 2018

Prepared by: Rummel, Klepper & Kahl

Wetland Restoration in Alberta

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Montana Ground-Water Assessment Statewide Monitoring Well Network

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Vegetation Management and Water Yield: Silver Bullet or a Pipe Dream?

Alberta Transportation s Wetland Habitat Compensation Program

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

COMFORT LAKE - FOREST LAKE WATERSHED DISTRICT RULES. Adopted December 18, 2008 Amended March, 24, 2011

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

The History and Use of Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States

Kevin L. Erwin CE PWS Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc Bayside Parkway Ft. Myers, Florida USA

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit Application Tips

Adapting Watershed Tools to Protect Wetlands

RAPID ASSESSMENT OF WETLAND FUNCTIONAL VALUES FOR THE WAUKESHA WEST BYPASS ALTERNATIVE ROUTES

Intermittent Stream Reclamation

Water and Watersheds. Data Maps Action

M E M O R A N D U M Clallam County Public Works Department

Public Notice ISSUED: 26 December 2017 EXPIRES: 26 January 2018

Lower Columbia River Pile Dike Assessment

Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation

PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT

Dane County Wetlands Resource Management Guide

Doyle Park Reconstruction Project Improving Flood Control Facilities to Meet a TMDL

Recent Developments in Water Withdrawal Management

Interest in a Community Model for Operational Delta Forecasting

7.0 natural resources. 178 Natural Resources

Hydrologic Analysis Techniques ( 87 Manual Hydrology Tools )

Calculating Mitigation

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY

Rural Wetland Functions and Protection: A Case Study. by Doug Littauer

Stormwater Local Design Manual For Houston County, Georgia

The Sustainability of Floods Pond

Freight Street Development Strategy

Section 4. Terrestrial Habitats

Spring Forecast Based Operations, Folsom Dam, California

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

MODEL Stormwater Local Design Manual. City of Centerville

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Information for File #MVP MVM

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Natural Features in Michigan s Coastal Zone Phase I: Potential Changes to Natural Communities

US Army Corps of Engineers and Stream Restoration Permitting


Once There Were Beavers: A Stream Flow Restoration Project for the Potomac Headwaters. Cacapon Institute High View, WV

Great Lakes Update. Volume 189: 2013 January through June Summary

Overview of Corps Regulatory Program

THE WATER IS RISING SCALABLE, RELIABLE, AND RELEVANT INFORMATION SUPPORTING FIRST RESPONDERS. May 3, 2017

EFFECTS OF WATERSHED TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS, LAND USE, AND CLIMATE ON BASEFLOW HYDROLOGY IN HUMID REGIONS: A REVIEW

12/9/2011. Constructed Wetlands. Functions, Design Criteria

REROUTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Simulation of Event Based Runoff Using HEC-HMS Model for an Experimental Watershed

3 Objectives 3 Ob jec tives

Climate Change Impacts in Washington State

EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES RESPONSE TO METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT IN THESSALY, GREECE

Definitions 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology

Transcription:

Performance Standards for Target Hydrology Steve Eggers Senior Ecologist Regulatory Branch St. Paul District December 10, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers

Introduction Target Hydrology: the hydrology necessary to achieve the objectives of a compensation site Target Vegetation: the specific wetland plant communities to be established at a compensation site Goal: match target hydrology with target vegetation to achieve a higher degree of success at wetland compensation sites A compensation site that meets performance standards for both target hydrology and target vegetation is typically on the correct trajectory for success 12/9/2015 2

History (MN/WI) By 2005, seed mixes and performance standards for target vegetation had advanced significantly However, performance standards for target hydrology often consisted of a one size fits all, minimum for wetland hydrology the driest condition that would minimally meet wetland criteria The goal is not to establish the minimum wetland hydrology, but rather to establish the optimum hydrology for targeted wetland plant communities and associated functions and services 12/9/2015 3

Target Hydrology Performance Standards (PS) for MN/WI Deep Marshes Shallow Marshes Sedge Meadows Fresh (Wet) Meadows Wet to Wet-Mesic Prairies Calcareous Fens Open Bogs Coniferous Bogs Shrub-Carrs Alder Thickets Hardwood Swamps Coniferous Swamps Floodplain Forests Seasonally Flooded Basins Target hydrology PS developed for specific plant communities based on monitoring well data, field observations, scientific literature and other sources Plant communities based on: Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI, Version 3.2 http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p266001coll1/id/2801/rec/1

Components of Target Hydrology PS for Specific Wetland Plant Communities Specify minimums and maximums for depth, duration and frequency of inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface During the growing season In the context of antecedent precipitation Use monitoring wells/dataloggers to confirm whether PS are met Regionalized to account for different plant communities, climatic conditions, etc. 12/9/2015 5

Components of Target Hydrology PS for Specific Wetland Plant Communities During the growing season Growing season is determined in accordance with the regional supplements to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (e.g., the green up indicator) 12/9/2015 6

Components of Target Hydrology PS for Specific Wetland Plant Communities In the context of antecedent precipitation PS specify the antecedent conditions under which inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface is required Many types of wetlands are naturally dry during late summer or during periods of below normal precipitation Thus, it would not be reasonable nor prudent to require inundation, or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface, for 100 percent of the growing season every year Inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface is not required for certain wetland plant communities during monitoring periods that are drier than normal 12/9/2015 7

Defining Antecedent Precipitation Terminology Used in the PS References for categorizing antecedent precipitation as normal, wetter than normal, and drier than normal Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology (Sprecher and Warne 2000) http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/wrap00-1.pdf Hydrology Tools for Wetland Determination (Woodward, ed. 1997) http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/opennonwebcontent.aspx?content=17556.wba 12/9/2015 8

Methodology for Defining Antecedent Precipitation Terminology Used in the PS For a particular weather station, 30 years of monthly precipitation data are used to generate a bell-shaped curve. The normal range of precipitation for each month is defined as that between the 30 th and 70 th percentiles of monthly precipitation totals.

Recommended approach for presenting precipitation data in monitoring reports 12/9/2015 10

Components of Target Hydrology PS for Specific Wetland Plant Communities Monitoring Wells/Dataloggers PS are based on a consecutive number of days of inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface Once weekly, twice weekly, etc., readings are not suitable because they do not confirm whether the consecutive day requirement is met Recommended approach is installation of monitoring wells/ dataloggers set for multiple readings/day 12/9/2015 11

Depth, Duration & Frequency of Inundation and/or the Water Table Starting point is the wetland hydrology technical standard for interpreting monitoring well data (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2005) http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/tnwrap05-2.pdf Inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface for >14 consecutive days during the growing season in most years (>50 percent probability) Use reference standard wetlands, if practicable Build PS based on best available information: (1) scientific literature; (2) hydrological data collected by watershed districts, for research projects, monitoring of previously constructed compensation sites, etc.; (3) stream gauge data; and (4) consultation with regional wetland experts. 12/9/2015 12

Depth to Water Table vs. Saturated Soils The wetland hydrology tech standard uses depth to the water table; therefore, the PS use depth to the water table Depth to saturated soils is problematic for purposes of the PS and is not used for that reason Upper limit of soil saturation due to the capillary fringe* can be difficult to measure in the field and is not practical for daily hydrologic monitoring Monitoring wells measure depth to the water table cannot measure saturation due to capillary fringe Depth to the water table can be monitored readily and consistently using monitoring wells * Tension-saturated zone 12/9/2015 13

Reference Standard Wetlands Least altered wetlands in the least altered landscapes that are of the same type as that proposed for the compensation site Located on-site or as close as possible to the compensation site Data from monitoring wells/dataloggers in reference standard wetland are then compared to that from the restored/enhanced/created wetland of the compensation site This approach is the ideal; however, finding and instrumenting reference standard wetlands in proximity to a compensation site is often not practicable 12/9/2015 14

Reference Standard Wetlands Example: A compensation site plan proposes restoration of a depressional (HGM class), hardwood swamp community on Histosols (organic soils) A reference standard depressional, hardwood swamp community on Histosols and in proximity to the compensation site is instrumented with monitoring wells/dataloggers Monitoring well data are then compared between restored and reference standard hardwood swamp communities Set criteria for acceptable range of differences in inundation and/or depth to the water table (e.g., plus or minus 20%) 12/9/2015 15

Building PS Based on Hydrological Data Example: Characteristic hydrograph for certain wetland plant communities in MN/WI is inundation and/or a water table <12 inches below the soil surface for 4-6 weeks during the early growing season (April-May-June) followed by a water table more than 12 inches below the soil surface for the remainder of the growing season ( seasonal wetlands ) April-May-June July-Aug-Sept-Oct Nov Soil Surface 12 inches 12/9/2015 16

From Eggers and Reed (2015) Example WET PRAIRIES General Description: Herbaceous communities dominated by native, hydrophytic grasses and forbs associated with prairies; growing on hydric mineral soils with a seasonal high water table; periodically inundated for brief duration following snowmelt and heavy precipitation events.* *Cowardin et al. (1979) hydrologic regime saturated 12/9/2015 17

Example: Target Hydrology PS for WET PRAIRIES (Seasonal High Water Table) Hydrology shall consist of a water table 12 inches or less below the soil surface for a minimum of 28 consecutive days during the growing season under normal to wetter than normal hydrological conditions. (Inundation) Inundation during the growing season shall not occur except: (1) at the start of the growing season (following snowmelt); and (2) following the 10- year, 24-hour or greater precipitation events. Depth of inundation shall be less than 6 inches with a duration of less than 14 consecutive days. Comments: This PS is based on wet prairies that exhibit a water table <12 inches below the soil surface for 4-6 weeks early in the growing season followed by a decline in the water table below 12 inches. Thus, 4 consecutive weeks (28 days) is applied as the minimum duration of a water table <12 inches below the soil surface. Reference standard wet prairies are typically dry during drier than normal conditions so it is not a negative if the compensation site wet prairie community lacks a water table <12 inches below the soil surface during drier than normal conditions. But it also does not inform us of whether the required water table depth/duration would be met during normal and wetter than normal conditions. Answer: continue monitoring. 12/9/2015 18

From Eggers and Reed (2015) Example FLOODPLAIN FORESTS General Description: Forested communities dominated by hydrophytic, deciduous hardwoods growing on alluvial soils associated with riverine systems. Inundated during flood events but relatively well-drained for much of the growing season.* Flood Event Steve D. Eggers *Cowardin et al. (1979) hydrologic regime temporarily flooded Low River Stage: No Inundation Steve D. Eggers 12/9/2015 19

Example: Target Hydrology PS for FLOODPLAIN FORESTS* Hydrology shall consist of inundation for a minimum of 14 consecutive days during the growing season at the following frequencies: Elevations below 700: >90% of growing seasons Elevations 700-701: >70% of growing seasons Elevations 701-702: >50% of growing seasons Duration of inundation during the growing season shall not exceed consecutive days. Base duration on flood tolerances of the target vegetation *Requires stream gauge data and 1-foot contour interval mapping of the compensation site Steve D. Eggers 12/9/2015 20

Example: Target Hydrology PS for FLOODPLAIN FORESTS Hydrology shall consist of inundation for a minimum of 14 consecutive days during the growing season at the following frequencies: Elevations below 700: >90% of growing seasons Elevations 700-701: >70% of growing seasons Elevations 701-702: >50% of growing seasons Note that 14 consecutive days of inundation would result in an additional number of days of a water table <12 inches below the soil surface depending on soil textures Steve D. Eggers 12/9/2015 21

Example DEEP MARSHES General Description: Depth of inundation during the growing season ranges from 6 inches to 36 inches except under drought conditions.* Vegetation comprised of herbaceous emergent, floating, floating-leaved and submergent species. From Eggers and Reed (2015) *Cowardin et al. (1979) hydrologic regimes semi-permanently flooded and intermittently exposed 12/9/2015 22

Example: Target Hydrology PS for DEEP MARSHES Hydrology shall consist of inundation 6 inches to 36 inches in depth throughout the growing season with the exception of drought conditions. To be enforceable, any term or phrase used in a PS must be specifically defined or have an accepted methodology So precisely what constitutes drought conditions? Drought? 12/9/2015 23

Example: Drought Conditions Source: National Drought Mitigation Center http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/aboutus/classificationscheme.aspx

Summary Develop target hydrology PS for specific wetland plant communities based on reference standard wetlands and best available information Use site-specific data to tailor target hydrology PS to achieve the objectives of a particular compensation site Match appropriate target hydrology with target vegetation Confirm whether PS are met using monitoring wells/dataloggers set for multiple readings/day Use 30-day rolling totals to characterize precipitation during each monitoring year Use best professional judgment and, when warranted, flexibility in applying the target hydrology PS Contact: Steve Eggers, Senior Ecologist, steve.d.eggers@usace.army.mil or 651-290-5371 12/9/2015 25