Bridge No. 054-77-161.66(2388) BARS No. ROCKPORT I/C N (CSWB) over I 77 NORTH I-77 NBL 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 Wood County District 3 IS on the NHS ADT - 007000-2011 Type of Inspections Performed: BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Inspection and Report FIELD INSPECTED BY: STRUCTURAL EVALUATION BY: Dale Whited Rob Priddle REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Inspection Types Fracture Critical Underwater Other Special Inventory Interim Damage/Special Closure THE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Required: N UB Inspection Required Cliff Essig NBI 90 (Routine) Date: 07/17/2014 (LAST DAY) Required: N Interim-Condition Underwater Equipment: Special Code: Periodic In-Depth UB Inspection Vehicle: Item 93A Date: Item 93B Date: Item 93C Date: Inspection Date: 07/01/2008 Inspection Date: Inspection Date: 07/17/2014 Inspection Date: Inspection Date: Frequency: 24 Frequency: Frequency: Frequency: Frequency: Frequency:
Narrative Report PURPOSE PROCEDURE The purpose of this inspection (with Glenn Lough from Central Office) was to obtain additional information about collision damage from an over-height vehicle traveling south on CR 21 on August 10, 2013 (CM5137R). PROCEDURE Information for this inspection report was obtained July 16 and 17, 2014. The inspection party consisted of Team Leader D. L. Whited and A. J. Miracle. The inspection consisted of visually observing the superstructure elements in Span Two. The underside was observed from the ground and from a platform truck. The original Special Inspection was made August 12, 2013 by D. L. Whited, who document the collision damage. SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS A tractor trailer hauling a steel shipping container on a flat bed trailer (Infra source of Ypsilanti, Michigan) struck the bottom flanges of Beams Three - Six near the first diaphragm from Pier One in Span Two. The damage, scrape marks, was less severe on Beams Four and Five. The contact points with the most severe damages are on Beams Three and Six. The worst being Beam Six where the bottom flange is bent out 7-1/16", the south side of the bottom flange is bent up 2-3/4, the web is 5-1/4" out of plumb, and the bottom flange of Beam Three is bowed out 1-5/16". There is now a 1/2'' crack in Stringer Six at the contact point on the bottom flange. Dye Penetrant testing was done on Stringer Six to confirm the crack (Photos 1-5 & Condition Documentation Sketches). The first diaphragm north of Pier One, between Beams Three and Four has collision damage. The bottom flange diaphragm connection welds are cracked for 1-1/4 on both stringers and the diaphragm connection at Beam Six is torn loose. The Pier One Cap and column have spalled concrete due to the container impact. The beams should be replaced, repaired, or straightened, as necessary. The diaphragms and their connections will need to be repaired or replaced and reattached to the structure. All steel repairs should then be primed and painted. The Pier One column and cap should have concrete repairs and the asphalt shoulder damage should be repaired. ENGINEERS COMMENTS New Structural Repair Unit Leader, Glenn Lough, PE, requested another review of the accident damage by CM5137R. This discovered additional damage, in the form of a crack in Beam 6, from this accident. From August 12, 2013 Inspecton for CM5137R The trailer and container were measured at 14'-10" per Ron Hartshorn, D-3 Safety Specialist, and is included in his DOH-107 Report. The pulling out of the welded diaphrams on Beam 6 could have damaged the beam in that area. There was also some damage to the asphalt shoulder, due to crash. 1
Narrative Report The shoulder of the bridge over Beam 6 on I-77 N was closed with barrels and signs, as a precautionary measure. CM5137R was set up to contain all the costs incurred by the DOH related to this accident. Structural Engineers will be scheduled to review the damage and decide a repair plan. INSPECTION HISTORY Original Periodic Inspection: June 14, 1973 Revised Periodic Inspection: January 13, 1977 Revised Periodic Inspection: February 5, 1981 Second Original Periodic Inspection: November 8, 1982 Revised Periodic Inspection: January 24, 1985 Revised Periodic Inspection: December 30, 1986 Third Original Periodic Inspection: January 5, 1989 Periodic Inspection: March 27, 1991 Inventory Inspection: February 10, 1993 Periodic Inspection: February 10, 1993 In-Depth Periodic Inspection: February 6, 1995 Periodic Inspection: November 18, 1996 Periodic Inspection: November 20, 1998 In-Depth Periodic Inspection: November 13, 2000 Periodic Inspection: September 12, 2002 Periodic Inspection: July 29, 2004 In-Depth Periodic Inspection: July 9, 2008 Periodic Inspection: June 29, 2012 Special Inspection: August 12, 2013 In-Depth Routine Inspection: June 4, 2014 Special Inspection: July 17, 2014 2
Photos Crack at Impact Point on North End of Stringer Six Crack at Impact Point on North End of Stringer Six 3
Photos Crack at Impact Point on North End of Stringer Six Crack at Impact Point on North End of Stringer Six 4
Photos Crack at Impact Point on North End of Stringer Six 5
Condition Documentation 6
Condition Documentation 7
Bridge Safe Load Capacity - Analysis & Justification Report DS-25 Group I: General Information FORM DS-25 (1) District 03 (2) Bridge No. 054-77-161.66 (2388) (3) BARS No. (4) County 054 - Wood (5) On Route IS 77 (6) Legal Road Loads 80,000 LBS (7) Located 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 (8) Spanning I 77 NORTH (9) Bridge Type (Main) Steel Cont Str/Mult-Bm or Grd (10) Roadway Width 038.0 FT (11) Year Built 1968 (12) Year Reconstructed 1998 (13) Span Lengths 46FT, 74FT, 46FT (14) Total Length 00171.2 FT (15) School Bus (16) Commercial Traffic (17) Design Live Load 9 (18) ADT 007000 in 2011 Group II: Rating Values FORM DS-25 ELEMENT INVENTORY RATINGS (TONS) OPERATING RATINGS (TONS) Truck or Lane Single Truck per Lane Truck or Lane Single Truck per Lane (18) Main H HS H T3 SU4 HS 3S2 H HS H T3 SU4 HS 3S2 ( ) (19) Floorbeam (20) Conn. ( ) (21) Stringer (Ext) 25 40 32 37 35 40 51 42 66 53 61 59 66 86 (22) Stringer (Int) 24 38 31 35 34 38 49 40 64 51 58 56 64 82 (23) Other ( ) CRTS RATINGS INVENTORY RATINGS (TONS) OPERATING RATINGS (TONS) (24) Element SU-40 SU-45 3S-55 3S-60 SU-40 SU-45 3S-55 3S-60 ( ) (25) Special Analysis: 8
Bridge Safe Load Capacity - Analysis & Justification Report DS-25 Group III: Stress Analysis Results FORM DS-25 (26) Ratings obtained by: Stress Analysis Working Stress Judgement Load Factor Original Design Loading Other Rated by: R. Priddle Date: 08/08/2012 Stress: Structural Steel 36 ksi (yield) Prestressed Steel ksi (yield) Other Checked by: M. Weekley Date: 08/08/2012 Concrete ksi (yield) Based on Current Conditions If "Yes", reflecting the results of what inspection? 06/29/2012 Manuals referenced: (27) Ratings controlled by: (Explain): A. B. FCM Original Design Deteriated Condition Other (28) Safe Load Capacity: Legal Loads Temporary Anticipated Repair Date: Permanent (29) Justification of Safe Load Capacity if item 28 is greater than minimum inventory rating: N/A (30) Present loading restriction (weight limit, speed limit, spacing): None (31) Recommended additional restrictions or change in restriction: None 9
Bridge Safe Load Capacity - Analysis & Justification Report DS-25 DS-25 Memo: Group IV: Commissioner Order Section FORM DS-25 Reason for restriction: (Check as applicable) The structure has been The structure has been Rescind CC Order dated: Repaired Replaced Reevaluated Evaluated Repaired Reevaluated, therefore the present posting is being rescinded., and the recommended restriction is required to prevent serious damage to the bridge by vehicular traffic. Restriction: CC Order Attached Map Attached Silhouette Attached Advanced Posting Recommended Detour Signing Detour Route and Length: SECTION I: (To be completed for any change in posting except removal) 1. If this posting is for a reduction in loading, what repairs could be made to avoid this change? 2. If repairs could be accomplished by State Forces, how long would actual work take during normal work hours? 3. Priority of bridge within District? 4. Work Scheduled? If yes, what type of work? Begin End 5. Could a higher load limit be justified temporarily? If yes, explain: 10
Bridge Safe Load Capacity - Analysis & Justification Report DS-25 SECTION II: Group IV (Cont.) (To be completed with posting requests for less than 15 tons on school bus routes) 1. School Board notified? Phone number: Date: FORM DS-25 Who was contacted? Title: 2. What are the weights of the buses involved? (Empty) (Loaded) Number of students? 3. School Board reaction? Stop Service Lighter buses Additional Comments: Unload buses Break-Up loads Detour No effect 4. Detour acceptable by board? Additional travel distance? miles (show detour on location map) 5. Is upgrading of detour feasible and/or neccessary? If yes, type and cost: DBE Signature: Date: DM/DE Signature: Date: OM Signature: Date: APPROVED BY: DEPUTY STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER - OPERATIONS 11
Scour Evaluation Summary DS-34 Analysis Needed Group I: General Information Analysis Completed Plan of Action FORM DS-34 (1) Bridge Number 054-77-161.66 (2388) (3) Local Name of Bridge ROCKPORT I/C N (CSWB) (4) Route 77 (5) County 054 - Wood (6) District 03 (7) Feature Intersected I 77 NORTH (8) Location 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 (9) Year Built 1968 Year Reconstructed 1998 (10) Scour Evaluation Priority 1 (11) ADT: 007000 in 2011 Group II: Screening FORM DS-34 (12) Scour Potential (13) Screening Category (1A) (1B) (1C) Low Risk (14) Summary of Screening Evaluation (SEE NOTE 1): The structure is not over a waterway. Scour Susceptible Unknown Foundation (15) Recommendation based on screening (SEE NOTE 2): (16) DS21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19: Screening Recommendation Official DS-21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19 (17) Screening by: Robert A. Priddle (18) Screening Date: 06/13/1991 Note 1: If structure does NOT have scour potential and scour potential is NOT checked, then it CANNOT be classified as "Low Risk", "Scour Susceptible" or "Unknown Foundation". If structure is classified as having no scour potential or Low Risk, provide justification for classifying as no scour potential or assigning to Low Risk category. If unknown foundation, provide the action proposed to determine foundation details. Note 2: If scour evaluation indicates a scour critical situation then a positive recommendation must be made for needed corrective action, as well as proposed method of implementing the corrective action. Scour critical situations must be documented and tracked as a critical deficiency per the requirements of BMD A-63 and BMD A-64. If scour susceptible, provide results of scour depth analysis and resultant evaluation. Provide additional sheets or details as necessary to adequately document the evaluation. N N 12
Scour Evaluation Summary DS-34 Group III: Scour Evaluation FORM DS-34 (19) Scour Potential (20) Scour Category (1A) (1D) Low Risk Scour Critical (21) Summary of Scour Evaluation (SEE NOTE 2): (22) Recommendation based on Scour Evaluation (SEE NOTE 2): (23) Recommendation DS21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19 Official DS21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19 N (24) Evaluation by: (25) Evaluation Date: Note 1: If structure does NOT have scour potential and scour potential is NOT checked, then it CANNOT be classified as "Low Risk", "Scour Susceptible" or "Unknown Foundation". If structure is classified as having no scour potential or Low Risk, provide justification for classifying as no scour potential or assigning to Low Risk category. If unknown foundation, provide the action proposed to determine foundation details. Note 2: If scour evaluation indicates a scour critical situation then a positive recommendation must be made for needed corrective action, as well as proposed method of implementing the corrective action. Scour critical situations must be documented and tracked as a critical deficiency per the requirements of BMD A-63 and BMD A-64. If scour susceptible, provide results of scour depth analysis and resultant evaluation. Provide additional sheets or details as necessary to adequately document the evaluation. Group IV: Corrective Action FORM DS-34 (26) Corrective Action Complete: (27) Recommendation DS21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19 Official DS21 Code, Sheet 8, Item 19 N (28) Reported by: (29) Reported Date: (30) Proposed Action 1 (31) Proposed Action 2 (32) Completed Action 1 (33) Completed Action 2 13
Structure Inventory & Appraisal BIMS BARS No.: Design No.: 2388 Route Signing Prefix: 1 Bridge No.: 054-77-161.66 (2388) Year Built: 1968 Year Reconstructed: 1998 Bridge Type (Main): CSWB Structure Length: 00171.2 Deck Width, Out-to-Out: 041.5 Total Number of Spans - Main Unit: 001 Total Number of Spans - Approach Spans: 0002 Local Name of Bridge: ROCKPORT I/C N (CSWB) Feature Intersected: I 77 NORTH Posted? No CRTS Posted? No Create Date: 07/21/2014 Inspection Date: 07/16/2014 (FIRST DAY) Under Construction Inspected By: State Inspection Types NBI 90 (Routine) Date: 07/17/2014 (LAST DAY) Periodic D In-Depth e Interim-Condition Fracture Critical Required: N Underwater Required: N Underwater Equipment: Other Special Special Code: Frequency: 24 Item 93A Date: Item 93B Date: Item 93C Date: Frequency: Frequency: Frequency: Inventory Inspection Date: 07/01/2008 Interim Inspection Date: Damage/Special Inspection Date: 07/17/2014 Closure Inspection Date: i UB Inspection Required Inspection Date: o UB Inspection Vehicle: Frequency: Frequency: 14
Structure Inventory & Appraisal Maintenance Items There are no maintenance items for this asset. 15 1
Maps 16
Structure Inventory & Appraisal Inventory (Sheet 1) FORM DS-21 2 Control Number (BARS) Bridge Number (BARS - Hyperlink) 3 Inventory Route 1-1 - 1-77 - - 0 4 Mile Post 161.66 5 Bridge Design Number 2388 6 Direction 1 7 Feature Intersected 2 - I 77 NORTH - 8 Ground Level Bypass Possible 2 9 Bypass Detour Length 1 miles 10 Toll 3 11 Maintenance Responsibility 01 12 Owner 01 13 Bridge Classification 2 14 Historical Significance 5 15 Legal Road 3 16 District 03 17 Date of Inventory 07/01/2008 18 Permit Vertical Clearance 19 Permit Horizontal Clearance 20 Traffic Safety Features Traffic Situation Bridge Railing Transition Approach Guardrail Approach Guardrail 21 Facility Carred by Structure 22 Local Name of Bridge 23 Type of Traffic I-77 NBL NB\EB SB\WB 99 99 00 00 24 00 00 00 0 9 8 8 9 Legislature ROCKPORT I/C N (CSWB) 7 Indicates items required for non-highway bridges Indicates new State required item for non-highway bridges 17
Inventory (Sheet 2) FORM DS-21 3 Location 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 4 Latitude 5 Longitude 39.24200-81.1955 6 State Functional Classification 1 7 Parallel Structure Designation R 8 Direction of Traffic 1 9 Temporary Structure 10 Border Bridge - 11 Border Bridge Structure Number 12 Highway System of the Inventory Route 1 13 Designated National Network 1 14 City or Town 00000 15 Functional Classification of Inventory Route 01 16 STRAHNET Highway Designation 1 17 Base Highway Network 1 18 LRS Inv. Rte., Sub-Rte. Number 000000077N - 00 19 Federal Lands Highways 0 Indicates items required for non-highway bridges 18
Under Records (Sheet 3) FORM DS-21 Total Number of Underrecord(s): 1 Underrecord 2 NBI# NBI Field Name Underrecord Value 1 State Code 543 - West Virginia 3 County (Parish) Code 054 - Wood 4 Place Code 00000 - None 5A Inventory Route: Record Type 2 - UNDERRECORD 2 TYPE (IF ONLY 1 UNDERREC) 5B Inventory Route: Route Signing Prefix 4 - County Highway 5C Inventory Route: Designated Level of Service 1 - Mainline 5D Inventory Route: Route Number 021 5DSUB Inventory Route: Sub Route Number 00 5E Inventory Route: Directional Suffix 0 - Not Applicable 6A Features Intersected I 77 NORTH 6B Features Intersected: Critical Feature (NO LONGER CODED) 7 Facility Carried by Structure I-77 NBL 8 Structure Number 9 Location 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 10 Inventory Route, Minimum Vertical Clearance 14 Ft. 7 In. 11 Milepost 0002.02 miles 12 Base Highway Network 1 - Is on Base Network 13A LRS Inventory Route 021 13B LRS Inventory Route: Subroute Number 00 16 Latitude 39.24200 17 Longitude -81.1955 19 Bypass, Detour Length 1 miles 20 Toll 3 = On free road. The structure is toll-free and carries a toll-free highway. 26 Functional Classification of Inventory Route 07 - Rural: Major Collector 27 Year Built 1968 28A Lanes On Structure 02 28B Lanes Under Structure 2 29 Average Daily Traffic 1100 30 Year of Average Daily Traffic 10 42A Type of Service on Bridge 1 - Highway 42B Type of Service under Bridge 1 - Highway, with or without pedestrian 43A Structure Type, Main: Kind of material and/or design 43B Structure Type, Main: Type of design and/or construction 47 Inventory Route, Total Horizontal Clerance 40 48 Length of Maximum Span 74 Ft. 49 Structure Length 00171.2 Ft. 100 STRAHNET Highway Designation 0 - the inventory route is not a STRAHNET route. 101 Parallel Structure Designation R - Right structure of parallel bridges carries roadway in direction of inventory 102 Direction of Traffic 1-1-way traffic 103 Temporary Structure Designation N - Not Applicable 104 Highway System of the Inventory Route 0 - Inventory Route is not on the NHS 109 Average Daily Truck Traffic 08 110 Designated National Network 0 - The inventory route is not part of the national network for trucks. West Virginia Custom Entry (Non-NBI Items) Functional Classification 4 - Local Service (include Delta Route and Park and Forest Routes) Route Under Structure - Structure Under Structure 0 - Route is not carried by a bridge that is located under the inventory route bridge. Control Number of Structure Under Structure 000000 Permit Vertical Clearance (Superload) NB-EB 14 Ft. 7 In. Permit Horizontal Clearance (Superload) NB-EB 24 Ft. 0 In. Permit Vertical Clearance (Superload) SB-WB 0 Ft. In. Permit Horizontal Clearance (Superload) SB-WB 0 Ft. 0 In. 19
Roadkey 54400210000 20
Inventory (Sheet 4) FORM DS-21 3 Year Built 4 Year Reconstructed 5 Year Widened 6 Lanes On and Under 7 Design Load 8 Approach Roadway Width 9 Bridge Median 10 Skew 11 Structure Flared 12 Type of Service 13 Navigation Control 14 Navigation Vertical Clearance 15 Navigation Horizontal Clearance 16 NBIS Bridge Length 17 Structure Length 0-000 00171.2 1-1968 1998 0000 02-02 9 024 ft ft 44 0 1-1 N 000.0 ft 0000.0 ft Y (Feet & Tenths) 18 Curb, Sidewalk Width 19 Bridge Roadway Width, Curb-to-Curb 20 Deck Width, Out-to-Out 21 Deck Structure Type 22 Wearing Surface / Protective 23 Type of Field Connection Left Right 00.0 00.0 038.0 041.5 (Feet & Tenths) (Feet & Tenths) (Feet & Tenths) 1 1-0 - 1 4 Indicates items required for non-highway bridges 21
Inventory (Sheet 5) FORM DS-21 3 Horizontal Clearance 38.0 (Feet & Tenths) 4 Minimum Vertical Clearance for 10 Ft. Width 99 ft 99 in 5 Minimum Vertical Clearance OVER Bridge Roadway 99 ft 99 in 6 Minimum Vertical Underclearance H - 14 ft 07 in 7 Underclearance - Lateral Right H - 07.5 (Feet & Tenths) 8 Underclearance - Lateral Left 9 Utilities on Structure 00.0 (Feet & Tenths) 0 10 Total Number of Spans - Main Unit 001 11 Total Number of Spans - Approach Spans 0002 22
Span Information (Sheet 6) FORM DS-21 Maximum Span Length: 74 Span Lengths: 46FT, 74FT, 46FT Span - Type: Material: 4 - Steel Cont Span - Type: Type: 02 - Str/Mult-Bm or Grd Approach Spans - Kind of Material/Design: 4 - Steel Continuous Approach Spans - Type of Design/Construction: 02 - Stringer/Multi-Beam or Girder Span Number: 1 Substructure: Substructure Type: 1 - Abutment Substructure Number: 01 Type of Construction: Substructure Material: 2 - Reinforced Concrete Substructure Design: 8 - Stub Abutments Span Number: 01 Span Type: Span Material: 4 - Steel Continuous Span Design: 02 - Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder Span Length: 0046.0 Span Main Approach: 2 - Main Approach Span Substructure: Substructure Type: 2 - Pier Substructure Number: 01 Type of Construction: Substructure Material: 2 - Reinforced Concrete Substructure Design: 7 - Column Bent - Cantilever Cap Span Number: 2 Span Number: 02 Span Type: Span Material: 4 - Steel Continuous Span Design: 02 - Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder Span Length: 74 Span Main Approach: 1 - Main Span Substructure: Substructure Type: 2 - Pier Substructure Number: 02 Type of Construction: Substructure Material: 2 - Reinforced Concrete Substructure Design: 7 - Column Bent - Cantilever Cap Span Number: 3 Span Number: 03 Span Type: Span Material: 4 - Steel Continuous Span Design: 02 - Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder Span Length: 46 Span Main Approach: 2 - Main Approach Span 23
Substructure: Substructure Type: 1 - Abutment Substructure Number: 02 Type of Construction: Substructure Material: 2 - Reinforced Concrete Substructure Design: 8 - Stub Abutments 24
Condition and Appraisal (Sheet 8) Condition Items 1 2 3 4 5 Wearing Surface Deck Superstructure Substructure Channel and Channel Protection 8 7 8 8 N 6 Culverts N Live Load Rating Summary FORM DS-21 7 Operating Rating (HS) 64-2 8 Inventory Rating (HS) 38-2 9 Inventory Rating (H or Other) 1-24 Appraisal Items 10 11 12 13 14 15 Structural Evaluation Deck Geometry Underclearnace - Vertical and Horizontal Approach Roadway Alignment Waterway Adequacy Operating Capacity vs. Legal Load 8 6 4 8 N 5 16 Structure Open, Posted, or Closed to Traffic A 17 Pier or Abutment Protection (For Navigation) 18 Scour Critical Bridges N Critical Features Inspections and Dates 19 Fracture Critical Details N - 00 20 Underwater Inspection N - 00 21 Other Special Inspection N - 00 Date of Last Inspection Date of Last Inspection Date of Last Inspection 22 Designated Inspection Fequency 24 23 Date of Inspection 07/17/2014 24 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 007000 25 Year of ADT 2011 26 27 28 Average Daily Truck Traffic (Percent) Future Average Daily Traffic Year of Future ADT 19 012880 2031 Indicates items required for non-highway bridges 25
Condition and Appraisal (Sheet 9) Special Ratings and Postings FORM DS-21 Gross Load H Truck (2 Axles) T3 Truck (3 Axles) SU4 Truck (4+ Axles) HS Truck (Semi 4) 3S2 Truck (Semi 5+) 3 Rating Posting Date of Posting Other Restrictions 4 Live Load Ratings - Controlling Member Ratings Inventory Operating Main Floor Beam Stringer Maximum Support 38 64 Speed Restrictions Stringer Minimum Support Connection Special Permit Ratings 5 H Truck (2 Axles) T3 Truck (3 Axles) SU4 Truck (4+ Axles) HS Truck (Semi 4) 3S2 Truck (Semi 5+) Rating 51 58 56 64 82 6 7 Method Used to Determine Operating Rating Method Used to Determine Inventory Rating Coal Resource Transportation System Trucks 1 1 SU-40 (3 Axles) SU-45 (4 Axles) 3S-55 (Semi 5) 3S-60 (Semi 6) 8 Inventory Operating Posting Date of Posting (CRTS) Other Restrictions (CRTS) 26
Condition and Appraisal (Sheet 10) Proposed Permanent Improvements 3 Type of Work Recommended 35-1 4 Year Needed 2030 5 Length of Structure Improvement 00171.0 6 Bridge Improvement Cost $1,000,000 7 Roadway Improvement Cost (Approaches) $0,100,000 8 Total Project Cost $1,100,000 9 Year of Improvement Cost Estimate 2012 FORM DS-21 Proposed Maintenance Needs 10 Painting Cost $050,000 11 Year Painting Needed 2015 12 Other Maintenance Work Needed A 01 13 Year Other Maintenance Work Needed 2013 14 Total Cost of Other Maintenance Work 224000 B C D 99 Notes: WO91-072COMP1998BYCT BILCO NEWDECK,C&P 02-140HT SEALBW;CMR04-111 2004, 05-138REPlaced by 07-60 8-2007; WO 12-60 fill void with grout at ab 2 s corner and seal 10-2011; WO 13-39 seal small EJ tear at ab2 fastlane with gutter seal;the change from WS to LF has minimual change for ext stringers, but 3 to 31% change in the ext stringer.; WO INSP 14-03 inspect and document damage done by CM5137R; WO DTE 14-10 shoulder closed by accient/install appropriate signs; WO 14-54 HP provide scissor Truck and TC for CO reivew of damage; WO 15-20 and INSP 15-01 to assist Glenn Lough in CM5137R accident inspection; 27
Administrative Documentation There are no files for this asset. 28
NBI Summary IDENTIFICATION Structure No.:... Route Signing Prefix:... 1 Des. Level of Service:... 1 Route No.:... 77 Directional Suffix:... 0 District:... 03 County:... 054 City/Town:... 00000 Feature Intersected:... I 77 NORTH Facility Carried:... I-77 NBL Location:... 8.37 MILES S OF WV 14 Log Mile Over:... 161.66 Base Highway Network:... 1 Inventory Route:... 000000077N Subroute No.:... 00 Latitude:... 39.24200 Longitude.:... -81.1955 Neighboring State:... Percent Responsibility:... Border Bridge No.:... STRUCTURE TYPE & MATERIAL Main Span Material:... 4 Main Span Design:... 02 Appr. Span Material:... 4 Appr Span Design:... 02 No. of Main Spans:... 001 No. of Appr. Spans:... 0002 Deck Type:... 1 Wearing Surface:... 1 Deck Membrane.:... 0 Deck Protection:... 1 AGE & SERVICE Year Built:... 1968 Year Reconstructed:... 1998 Type of Service ON Bridge:... 1 Type of Service UNDER Bridge:... 1 Lanes On:... 02 Lanes Under:... 02 ADT of Inventory Route:... 007000 Year of ADT:... 2011 Percentage of Trucks:... 19 Detour Length:... 1 miles GEOMETRIC DATA Max Span Length:... 74 FT Structure Length:... 00171.2 FT Left Curb/Sidewalk Width:... 00.0 FT Right Curb/Sidewalk Width:... 00.0 FT Roadway Width:... 038.0 FT Deck Width:... 041.5 FT Appr. Roadway Width:... 024 FT Bridge Median:... 0 Skew:... 44 DEG Min. Vert. Clearance:... 99 FT 99 IN Total Horiz. Clearance:... 38.0 FT Vert. Clearance/Deck:... 99 FT 99 IN Min. Vert. Clearance Under - Code:... H Min. Vert. Clearance Under:... 14 FT Min. Latr. Clearance Right - Code:... H Min. Latr. Clearance Right:... 07.5 FT Min. Latr. Clearance Left:... 00.0 FT Structure Flared:... 0 CLASSIFICATION NBIS Bridge Length:... Y Highway System Inv. Route:... 1 Functional Class - Over:... 01 STRAHNET Highway Designation:... 1 Parallel Structure Designation:... R Direction of Traffic:... 1 Temp. Structure Designation:... Highway System Inv. Route:... 1 Federal Lands Highway:... 0 Designated National Truck Network:... 1 Toll:... 3 Maintenance Responsibility:... 01 Owner:... 01 Historical Significance:... 5 LOAD RATING & POSTING Design Load:... 9 Operating Rating - Method:... 1 Operating Rating - Tons:... 64 Inventory Rating - Method:... 1 Inventory Rating - Tons:... 38 Bridge Posting:... 5 Open, Posted, Closed:... A NAVIGATION DATA Navigation Control:... N Pier or Abutment Protection:... Nav. Vert. Clearance:... 000.0 FT Min. Nav. Vert. Clear. (Lift Bridge):... Nav. Horiz. Clearance:... 0000.0 FT CONDITION Deck:... 7 Superstructure:... 8 Substructure:... 8 Channel:... N Culvert Underfill:... N APPRAISAL Structural Eval Appraisal:... 8 Deck Geometry Appraisal:... 6 Underclearances - Vert. & Horiz. Appraisal:... 4 Waterway Adequacy Appraisal:... N Appr. Roadway Align. Appraisal:... 8 Traffic Safety Features:... 9 8 8 9 Scour Critical Bridges:... N PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Type of Work Proposed:... 35 Work Done By:... 1 Length of Str. Improvement:... 00171.0 Bridge Improvement Cost:... $1,000,000 Roadway Improvement Cost:... $0,100,000 Total Project Cost:... $1,100,000 Year of Improvement Cost Estimate:... 2012 Future ADT:... 012880 Year of Future ADT:... 2031 INSPECTIONS Routine Inspection Date:... 07/17/2014 Designated Frequency:... 24 Mon Fracture Critical Details Frequency:... 00 Mon Date:... Underwater Frequency:... 00 Mon Date:... Other Special Details Frequency:... 00 Mon Date:... 29