National Capital Region Congestion Report

Similar documents
National Capital Region Congestion Report

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

Truck GPS Data for Freight Planning

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

TPB Scenario Study Task Force: Proposal for Development and Analysis of Two New Scenarios

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

ITEM 8 Action May 17, 2017

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

USING PRIVATE SECTOR TRAVEL TIME DATA FOR PROJECT-LEVEL WORK ZONE MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

1.1 Purpose of the Project

Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS)

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

Maine Turnpike Needs Assessment

Impact of Data Source on Travel Time Reliability Assessment

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

CLOGGED ARTERIES: AN EMPIRICAL APPROACH FOR IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING LOCALIZED HIGHWAY CONGESTION BOTTLENECKS

CANADA-WIDE STANDARDS FOR PM & OZONE STATUS OF JURISDICTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES MANITOBA

MEMORANDUM EXAMPLES FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES NEXT STEPS. Item 3 Long-Range Plan Task Force May 17, 2017

ITEM 9 Action October 18, 2017

New Jersey Pilot Study

5 Star London Hotels - Example Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER. Executive Summary Why Variable Pricing? What Was Studied? User Surveys Air Quality Analysis User And Equity Analysis

SR 99 Incident Response After- Action Plan

FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK-AND-RIDE DEMAND ESTIMATION STUDY

Regional Habitat Indicators Project. Workshop #1. Nov 9, 2016

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

! "#$$%& MY BLOG 2014

The Confluence Model. Presentation to Modeling and Forecasting Working Group January 21, 2015

Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations. National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation

Travel Time Reliability in the SLOCOG Region. October 27, 2014 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Transportation Education Series

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Table of Contents. List of Appendices

National Performance Research Data Set (NPMRDS): Travel Time Probe Data. Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission

Fundamentals of Transmission Operations

Did you know. Our Mission: Traveler Services; 100% accurate, anywhere, anytime. Operations & Maintenance Summary. Week Ending February 12, 2010

Marc de Croisset FBR CAPITAL MARKETS & CO. Coal-to-Gas Switching: Distilling the Issue

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR ELECTRICITY PURCHASE IN LIBERALIZED ENERGY MARKETS

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Cattle Outlook. January, 2018

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT

Jim Alexander Director of Design and Engineering, Southwest Light Rail Transit Project

Project Management. Learning Objectives. What are Projects? Dr. Richard Jerz. Describe or Explain:

FREEWAY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (PeMS): AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS TOOL

Report to the Finance Committee Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Prepared by the Office of Finance April 2016

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Risk Analysis of Freeway Lane Closure During Peak Period

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

MEASUREMENT OF RECURRING VERSUS NON-RECURRING CONGESTION: TECHNICAL REPORT

NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80)

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Transmission and Interconnectors

Session 8A ITS. Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems

Pricing local emission exposure of road traffic An agent-based approach

Wisconsin Traffic Operations Performance Management System (TOPMS)-Phase 1. Advisory Group Meeting-November 10, 2014

TAPPING INTO DELAY: ASSESSING RAIL TRANSIT PASSENGER DELAY USING TAP-IN-TAP-OUT FARE-SYSTEM DATA

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

Understanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process

Strategic Plan Progress Report Key Metrics and Actions

Integrated Corridor Management --An Overview --

Operations Management

Call Center Benchmark India

Final 2014 Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment

How safe is Beijing s Air Quality for Human Health? Naresh Kumar Θ

Emergency Incident Management, Benefits and Operational Issues

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. Training for Applications with Integration in SAP Business One. 27 November 2017 (07:09 GMT) Advanced

UNDERSTANDING PMIS: RIDE, PATCHING, AND OTHER FACTORS. Darlene C. Goehl, P.E. Dist. Pavement-Materials Engr. TxDOT - BRY

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

SHRP Project C11: Reliability Analysis Tool: User s Guide

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS GREENWAY POLLUTION CONTROL CENTRE 2013 ANNUAL REPORT

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. with Business Intelligence (BI) Crystal Reports. 26 December 2017 (18:02 GMT)

COURSE LISTING. Courses Listed. Training for Analytics with Business Warehouse (BW) in SAP BW on any Database. 26 November 2017 (06:48 GMT) Advanced

Measuring Safety Performance

Memorandum. 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR tel fax

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

407 TRANSITWAY. Planning & Preliminary Design

Emissions Modeling For Photochemical Modelers. Mark Janssen LADCO Photochemical Modelers Training August 3-4 th 2010

ISO Monitoring and Measurement Nonconformance and Corrective and Preventative Action

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS & LOW FLOW PROTECTION POLICY MICHAEL COLLEGE, P.E. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW THE WHARF PHASE 2 PUD

TX-92/ September 1990


Pumped hydro Storage Plants

Proceedings of the 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum

Transit Service Guidelines

The next release is scheduled for Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 10:00 A.M. (KST) In the U.S Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 8:00 P.

I-10 CONNECT. Public Meeting #1

Scope of Services Traffic Signal Retiming Contract FM NO Florida Department of Transportation District Four

Miami River Freight Improvement Plan Financial Management Number:

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

% Change. Total. Total Retail Sales Index* Estimate ($M)

Analytical Tools and Decision Support Systems SANDAG I-15 ICM. ITS PA January 30 th, 2014

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Title: Author(s): Transportation Research Board 77 th Annual Meeting January 11-15, 1998 Washington, D.C.

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

European Freight Forwarding Index

Transcription:

Item #6 TPB Technical Committee May 2, 2014 NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD National Capital Region Congestion Report 4th Quarter 2013 (DRAFT) Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002 www.mwcog.org

Author Wenjing Pu Transportation Engineer Project Management Andrew J. Meese Systems Management Planning Director Contributors C. Patrick Zilliacus Principal Transportation Engineer Clara Reschovsky Survey Analyst Oversight Gerald Miller Acting Co-Director, Department of Transportation Planning Robert Griffiths Acting Co-Director, Department of Transportation Planning Data and Tool Providers I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project INRIX, Inc. Center for Advanced Transportation Technology Laboratory, University of Maryland Release date: May 2, 2014 Available: www.mwcog.org/congestion (after finalization) For more information please contact COG/TPB staff Wenjing Pu (wpu@mwcog.org) Copyright 2014, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (COG/TPB)

Table of Contents Congestion Travel Time Index (TTI)... 1 Reliability Planning Time Index (PTI)... 2 Top 10 Bottlenecks... 3 Congestion Maps... 8 4 th Quarter 2013 Spotlight Federal Government Shutdown... 10 Background... 14 Motivation... 14 Methodology... 14

Congestion Travel Time Index (TTI) Interstate System Non-Interstate NHS 3 TTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 1.26 4.7% or 0.06 1 TTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 1.18 0.6% or 0.01 TTI 2013: 1.24 2.9% or 0.04 2 TTI 2013: 1.17 0.4% or 0.004 Non-NHS All Roads TTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 1.10 0.3% or 0.003 TTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 1.15 0.7% or 0.01 TTI 2013: 1.09 0.6% or 0.01 TTI 2013: 1.14 0.8% or 0.01 1 Compared to 4 th quarter 2012; 2 Compared to 2012; 3 NHS: National Highway System. Figure 1. Monthly average Travel Time Index for Total AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM peak (3:00-7:00 pm) Interstate System (520 directional miles) Non-Interstate NHS (2,160 drectional miles) 1.4 1.4 Travel Time Index 1.3 1.2 1.1 Travel Time Index 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2012 2013 Non-NHS (2,820 directional miles) 2010 2012 2013 All Roads (5,500 directional miles) 1.4 1.4 Travel Time Index 1.3 1.2 1.1 Travel Time Index 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2012 2013 2010 2012 2013 Travel Time Index Travel Time Index (TTI), defined as the ratio of actual travel time to free-flow travel time, measures the intensity of congestion. The higher the index, the more congested traffic conditions it represents, e.g., TTI = 1.00 means free flow conditions, while TTI = 1.30 indicates the actual travel time is 30% longer than the free-flow travel time. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 1

Reliability Planning Time Index (PTI) Interstate System Non-Interstate NHS 3 PTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 3.57 13.8% or 0.57 1 PTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 2.15 9.6% or 0.23 PTI 2013: 3.60 9.5% or 0.38 2 PTI 2013: 2.13 4.9% or 0.11 Non-NHS All Roads PTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 1.45 1.9% or 0.03 PTI 4 th Quarter 2013: 2.03 7.9% or 0.17 PTI 2013: 1.45 1.0% or 0.02 PTI 2013: 2.01 4.6% or 0.10 1 Compared to 4 th quarter 2012; 2 Compared to 2012; 3 NHS: National Highway System, 10/01/2012 definition. Figure 2. Monthly average Planning Time Index for Total AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM peak (3:00-7:00 pm) Planning Time Index 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Interstate System (520 directional miles) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2012 2013 Planning Time Index Non-Interstate NHS (2,160 directional miles) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2012 2013 Non-NHS (2,820 directional miles) All Roads (5,500 directional miles) Planning Time Index 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Planning Time Index 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 2012 2013 2010 2012 2013 Planning Time Index Planning Time Index (PTI), defined as the ratio of 95th percentile travel time to free flow travel time, measures travel time reliability. The higher the index, the less reliable traffic conditions it represents, e.g., PTI = 1.30 means a traveler has to budget 30% longer than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time 95% of the times (i.e., 19 out of 20 trips), while TTI = 1.60 indicates that one has to budget 60% longer than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time most of the times. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 2

Top 10 Bottlenecks Rank 1 Location I-66 W @ VA- 234/Exit 47 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor* 2 h 40 m 11.33 122 221,249 * The Impact Factor of a bottleneck is simply the product of the Average Duration (minutes), Average Max Length (miles) and the number of occurrences. Rank 2 Location I-270 Spur S @ I-270 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 1 h 49 m 7.35 241 192,962 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 3

Rank 3 Location I-66 E @ I- 495/Exit 64 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 5 m 5.18 249 161,128 Rank 4 Location I-495 CW @ American Legion Bridge Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 47 m 4.63 190 146,875 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 4

Rank 5 Location I-395 N @ 2nd St Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 34 m 6.88 129 136,752 Rank 6 Location I-495 CCW @ I- 66/Exit 9 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 59 m 8.39 90 135,236 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 5

Rank 7 Location I-495 CW @ MD- 214/Central Ave/Exit 15 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 3 m 8.52 129 135,225 Rank 8 Location I-66 E @ Vaden Dr/Exit 62 Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 1 h 48 m 5.21 156 87,859 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 6

Rank 9 Location I-270 Local N @ I- 270/Washington National Pike Average duration Average max length (miles) Occurrences Impact factor 2 h 6 m 4.28 159 85,730 Average Average max Rank Location Occurrences Impact factor duration length (miles) 10 I-95 N @ I-395 1 h 38 m 7.94 109 84,822 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 7

Congestion Maps Figure 3. Travel Time Index during weekday 8:00-9:00 AM in 4th Quarter 2013 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 8

Figure 4. Travel Time Index during weekday 5:00-6:00 PM in 4th Quarter 2013 National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 9

4 th Quarter 2013 Spotlight Federal Government Shutdown From October 1 through 16, 2013, the United States federal government entered into a shutdown. This event provided a unique opportunity to investigate the traffic impact of federal employees in the Washington area. Changes in traffic conditions from before to during and to after the shutdown were analyzed regionally and facility-specifically. According to the 2008-2012 American Community Survey data, there are 2.9 million workers in the TPB Planning Area, 17.0%, or half a million, of them are federal government workers. Out of the half a million federal workers, 67.4% use highways (excluding taxicab and motorcycle users) and 26.5% use public transportation (6.1% use other modes such as walk, bike or work at home). The federal government highway users account for 15.0% of all workers who use highways; the federal government public transportation users account for 30.3% of all workers who use public transportation. Analysis This analysis focused on the AM Peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM Peak (3:00-7:00 pm) on the Interstate system and the non-interstate NHS for the following weekdays (the 2012 data are provided as a reference): Before Shutdown: for 2013, 10 weekdays between Sep. 16 (Mon.) and Sep.27 (Fri.); for 2012, 10 weekdays between Sep. 17 (Mon.) and Sep.28 (Fri.). Shutdown: for 2013, 10 weekdays between Oct. 1 (Tue.) and Oct. 14 (Mon.); for 2012, 10 weekdays between Oct. 1 (Mon.) and Oct. 12 (Fri.). After Shutdown: for 2013, 10 weekdays between Oct. 21 (Mon.) and November 1 (Fri.); for 2012, 10 weekdays between Oct. 22 (Mon.) and Nov. 2 (Fri.). 2013 Average: all weekdays (Mon. through Fri.) in 2013. 2012 Average: all weekdays (Mon. through Fri.) in 2012. Travel Time Index for the above analysis periods is shown below in Figure 5 and the changes from Before to Shutdown are summarized in Table 1: Figure 5. Travel Time Index of Analysis Periods Travel Time Index 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 Interstate System 1.32 1.29 2013 1.34 2012 1.30 1.30 2012 Ave. 1.24 2013 Ave. Before Shutdown After Travel Time Index 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 Non-Interstate NHS 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.19 1.20 1.17 Before Shutdown After 2013 2012 2012 Ave. 2013 Ave. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 10

Regional Findings Table 1. Summary of Travel Time Index Changes from Before to Shutdown Travel Time Index 2013 2012 Interstate System Before 1.29 1.32 Shutdown 1.24 1.30 Change -3.3% -1.5% Non-Interstate NHS Before 1.19 1.21 Shutdown 1.17 1.21 Change -1.7% -0.10% Overall (NHS) Before 1.21 1.24 Shutdown 1.19 1.23 Change -2.0% -0.4% Traffic congestion, measured by the Travel Time Index, decreased by about 2% on the region s National Highway System from Before to Shutdown, including a 3.3% drop on the Interstate system and a 1.7% drop on the non-interstate NHS. Given that the same period change in 2012 was only a 1.5% drop on the Interstate system and a 0.1% drop on the non-intestate NHS, the congestion changes from Before to Shutdown in 2013 are considered significant. Traffic congestion After the shutdown marched higher than that of the Before (which was in September) in 2013 and was also higher than the 2013 Average, because October usually is more congested than the annual average. Overall, 2013 was less congested than 2012 as indicated by the annual averages in Figure 5. Facility-Specific Findings Segments with more than 10% improvement in congestion from Before to Shutdown were plotted in Figures 6 and 7 for AM Peak and PM Peak respectively. In the morning (Figure 6), freeway inbound traffic, both outside and inside the Beltway, generally experienced more than 10% improvement, with notable exceptions on I-270 southbound from Exit 5/Falls Road to the Spur, I-66 eastbound from Exit 57/US-50 to Exit 66/VA-7, I-95 northbound in Virginia from Exit 161/US-1 to I-495/Springfield interchange, and MD-5 from Surratts Road to I-495. In the afternoon (Figure 7), improvement scattered mainly on the northwest Beltway around the American Legion Bridge (both directions) and the northeast Beltway (inner loop only). Southbound GW Parkway from the Beltway to the TR Bridge also experienced noticeable improvement. Compared to the morning, the afternoon experienced less improvement; only a small portion of outbound traffic on the freeways improved, including I-66 WB from the Beltway to Exit 57/US-50, BW Parkway northbound around the Beltway, GW Parkway northbound approaching the Beltway, and a few segments on northbound I-270 and I-95 in Maryland. More Information More comprehensive analysis of the transportation impact of the Federal government shutdown is currently carried out by COG/TPB staff. This analysis looks at both traffic congestion and transit ridership in the region, and the full report will be released in the near future. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 11

Figure 6. AM Peak Most Significant Decrease of Congestion from Before to Shutdown Note: Dark green: TTI decreased more than 30% Medium green: TTI decreased 20-30% Light green: TTI decreased 10-20% Screen shot was captured in the VPP Suite. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 12

Figure 7. PM Peak Most Significant Decrease of Congestion from Before to Shutdown Note: Dark green: TTI decreased more than 30% Medium green: TTI decreased 20-30% Light green: TTI decreased 10-20% Screen shot was captured in the VPP Suite. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 13

Background Motivation Inspired by various agency and jurisdictional dashboard efforts around the country (e.g., Virginia Department of Transportation Dashboard), driven by the MAP-21 legislation and the emerging probebased traffic speed data from the I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project, this brief report tries to take advantage of the availability of rich data and analytical tools to produce customized, easy-tocommunicate, and quarterly updated traffic congestion and travel time reliability performance measures for the Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Planning Area. The goal of this effort is to make the Congestion Management Process alive on the TPB website that timely summarizes the region s congestion and the programs of the TPB and its member jurisdictions that would have an impact on congestion. The higher goal of this report is to help to facilitate performance-based transportation planning and programming process in the National Capital Region. Methodology Travel Time Index (TTI) TTI is defined as the ratio of actual travel time to free-flow travel time, measures the intensity of congestion. The higher the index, the more congested traffic conditions it represents, e.g., TTI = 1.00 means free flow conditions, while TTI = 1.30 indicates the actual travel time is 30% longer than the freeflow travel time. For more information, please refer to Travel Time Reliability: Making It There On Time, All The Time, a report published by the Federal Highway Administration and produced by the Texas Transportation Institute with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. This report uses the following method to calculate TTI: 1. Download INRIX 5-minute raw data from the I-95 Traffic Monitoring website (http://i95.inrix.com) or the VPP Suite website (https://vpp.ritis.org). 2. Aggregate the raw data to monthly average data by day of the week and hour of the day. Harmonic Mean was used to average the speeds and reference speeds (Harmonic Mean is only used here; other averages used are all Arithmetic Mean). For each segment (TMC), the monthly data have 168 observations (7 days in a week * 24 hours a day) in a month. 3. Calculate TTI = reference speed / speed in the monthly data. If TTI < 1 then make TTI = 1. If constraint TTI >= 1 was not imposed, some congestion could be cancelled by conditions with TTI < 1. 4. Calculate regional average TTI for the Interstate system, non-interstate NHS, non-nhs, and all roads for AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM Peak (3:00-7:00 pm) respectively, using segment length as the weight. 5. Calculate the average TTI of the AM Peak and PM Peak to obtain an overall congestion indicator. Planning Time Index (PTI) PTI is defined as the ratio of 95th percentile travel time to free flow travel time, measures travel time reliability. The higher the index, the less reliable traffic conditions it represents, e.g., PTI = 1.30 means a traveler has to budget 30% longer than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time 95% of the times (i.e., 19 out of 20 trips), while TTI = 1.60 indicates that one has to budget 60% longer than the uncongested travel time to arrive on time most of the times. For more information, please refer to Travel Time Reliability: Making It There On Time, All The Time, a report published by the Federal National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 14

Highway Administration and produced by the Texas Transportation Institute with Cambridge Systematics, Inc. This report uses the following method to calculate PTI: 1. Calculate TTI = reference speed / speed in the monthly data obtained in step 2 of the above TTI methodology. Do not impose constraint TTI >= 1, since the purpose of this calculation is to rank the TTIs to find the 95 th percentile, not to average the TTIs. 2. Calculate monthly average PTI: including sorting the data obtained in step 1 by segment, peak period, and month, finding the 95 th percentile TTI and this TTI is PTI by definition, and averaging the PTIs using segment length as the weight to get regional summaries (for the Interstate system, non- Interstate NHS, non-nhs, and all roads for AM peak (6:00-10:00 am) and PM Peak (3:00-7:00 pm) respectively). 3. Calculate yearly average PTI: including sorting the data obtained in step 1 by segment and peak period, finding the 95 th percentile TTI and this TTI is PTI by definition, and averaging the PTIs using segment length as the weight to get regional summaries. 4. Calculate the average PTI of the AM Peak and PM Peak to obtain an overall travel time reliability indicator. National Highway System (NHS) the October 1, 2012 designation of NHS was used in this report. In compliance with the MAP-21 requirements, all principal arterials have been added to the NHS. All Roads (in Figures 1 and 2) are the roads covered by the I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project/INRIX data, as shown below. Figure 8. I-95 Vehicle Probe Project/INRIX data coverage in the National Capital Region National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 15

Bottlenecks This report uses the Bottleneck Ranking tool in the VPP Suite to get the top 10 most significant bottleneck in the TPB Planning Area for a quarter. The VPP Suite uses the following methodology to track bottlenecks: Bottleneck conditions are determined by comparing the current reported speed to the reference speed for each segment of road. Reference speed values are provided by INRIX, Inc. for each segment and represent the 85th percentile observed speed for all time periods with a maximum value of 65 mph. If the reported speed falls below 60% of the reference, the road segment is flagged as a potential bottleneck. If the reported speed stays below 60% for five minutes, the segment is confirmed as a bottleneck location. Adjacent road segments meeting this condition are joined together to form the bottleneck queue. When reported speeds on every segment associated with a bottleneck queue have returned to values greater than 60% of their reference values and remained that way for 10 minutes, the bottleneck is considered cleared. The total duration of a bottleneck is the difference between the time when the congestion condition was first noticed (prior to the 5 minute lead in) and the time when the congestion condition recovered (prior to the 10 minute lead out). Bottlenecks whose total queue length, determined by adding the length of each road segment associated with the bottleneck, is less than 0.3 miles are ignored. Figure 9. The Life of a Bottleneck by Speed and Time This report uses the Impact Factor to rank the bottlenecks. The Impact Factor is simply the product of the Average Duration (minutes), Average Max Length (miles) and the number of occurrences. Bottleneck location maps and spiral charts are all screen shots from the VPP Suite. Congestion Maps The maps were generated by the Trend Map tool in the VPP Suite. Since the VPP Suite limits the total number of segments of a query, the maps only show the freeways and some major arterials. National Capital Region Congestion Report, 4 th Quarter 2013 (Draft) 16