Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Similar documents
2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

IOWA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

LOUISIANA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Concept of Operations prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for Rural Intersection Conflict Warning Systems II Deployment

CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

South Boston. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Safety. Introduction. Total System

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Transportation Technical Report Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement

Concept of Operations for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS)

PROVIDING SAFE AND EFFICIENT MOBILITY IN HAWAII: The Cost to Drivers of Deficient Roads, Highway Congestion and Traffic Crashes

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices

WorkZone Safety:Traffic Control Plans and Intrusion Prevention Basic Work Zone Traffic Control Principles External Traffic Control

Application of Road Safety Audits to Urban Streets

PPTA Project Pipeline

OKLAHOMA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

An Introduction to the. Safety Manual

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Transit Service Guidelines

Air Report. Project Information PPTA/LAP. Traffic Data I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE. Project Number: , C501, P101 UPC:

Tier 1 Recommendations October 30, 2017

QUALITY STANDARDS for Temporary Traffic Control Devices

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

I know that you all understand the critical importance of the freight transportation system

Section 3-01 General Concepts, Design Standards and Design Exceptions TABLE OF CONTENTS

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Concept of Operations

Utah s Most Critical Surface Transportation Projects to Support Economic Growth and Quality of Life. March Washington, DC

ENTERPRISE Transportation Pooled Fund Study TPF-5 (231)

Field Guide on. Safe Maintenance and. Work Zone Operations

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

Table of Contents. List of Appendices

2015 ATSSA Traffic Expo Report

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

Dynamic Lane Merge Systems

Connected vehicles and other advanced safety features can be effective in reducing, and maybe eliminating, these fatalities.

Funding for this guidebook was provided through the Genesee Transportation Council s Unified Planning Work Program

Star Ratings for the Strategic Road Network. Richard Leonard - Highways England

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

Technical Methods Part 2

Route 670 Connector Road

Project Initiation Form

FINAL REPORT IMPROVING NIGHT WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL. B. H. Cottrell, Jr. Senior Research Scientist

LASER GUIDANCE DETECTIONMEASUREMENT

Building West Virginia DOT s Geospatial Capabilities:

Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004)

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

SECTION 616 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL

Greater Charlotte Regional Freight Mobility Plan

To provide an update on the progress of the Peel Goods Movement Task Force and Peel Goods Movement Strategic Plan.

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/

Intelligent Transport Systems Master Plan

Scarborough Fire Department Scarborough, Maine Standard Operating Procedures

Congestion Mitigation

Connected and Automated Vehicles and the Future of Transportation. Dean Gustafson, P.E., PTOE State Operations Engineer April 25, 2017

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future

The Three C s of Urban Transportation Planning

SR 417 Extension. June 2003 INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY PROJECT SCOPE AND PURPOSE STUDY OBJECTIVE STUDY PHASES

U.S. 101 / San Mateo County Smart Corridor Project

National Governors Association

Risk Analysis of Freeway Lane Closure During Peak Period

Choosing a Location-based Application for your Business

INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS SUMMARY

GENERAL NOTES FOR WORK ZONE SAFETY SET UP GUIDE

Envisioning the Future: A History of Regional Planning Initiatives, Studies, and Plans

CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION

Work Zone Safety Performance Measures for Virginia

APPENDIX A GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF BARRIER/CHANNELIZING DEVICES IN WORK ZONES INTRODUCTION

RAJARAM BHAGAVATHULA Senior Research Associate

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Niagara Region Transportation Master Plan Niagara-Hamilton Trade Corridor Technical Paper

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

Successful Incident Management on a Major Reconstruction Project

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

New Jersey Pilot Study

Department: Physical Classification: Union: Wage Class: Salary Range: Organizational Summary: Job Description-Planning & Zoning Admin.

IMPROVING EXIT RAMP VISIBILITY IN WORK ZONES. Proposal submitted by: Cleveland State University and Ohio University. Principal Investigators:

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations. National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation

SMART WORK ZONE SOLUTIONS

Executive Summary. January 2015

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

THE USE OF LANE CONTROL SIGNALS AND CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS ON TEXAS HIGHWAYS

Transcription:

Chapter 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background Interstate 81 runs from Danbridge, Tennessee to the US/Canada border, connecting the six states of Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York. Spanning a total of approximately 850 miles between Knoxville, Tennessee and Watertown, New York, it serves as a connection between the southern economic hubs and the northeastern United States (CTR, 1996). Figure 1 shows the I-81 corridor running from Tennessee to New York. TN Knoxville WV PA NY VA Watertown MD In Virginia, the I-81 corridor is primarily a four-lane, divided, restricted access highway characterized mainly by rolling terrain. It traverses the western part of the state, connecting Bristol in the south and Winchester in the North (Figure 2). The longest Interstate in Virginia, I-81 spans approximately 325 miles in Virginia and is located between the scenic Blue Ridge and Allegheny mountains. It runs through predominantly rural areas having a historic background and several scenic attractions. Interstate 81 in Virginia cuts through Figure 1. I-81 from Tennessee to New York (Source: CTR, 1996) I-81 Corridor in Virginia Total length: 325 mi. Four lane divided Rolling terrain 81 Bristol Wytheville Roanoke Staunton Lexington 81 Winchester Harrisonburg Figure 2. The I-81 Corridor in Virginia (Source: CTR, 1996) Introduction 1

seven planning districts (one through seven), constituting 21 cities and towns and 32 counties with a total population of 1.2 million (19% of Virginia s population in 1991; CTR, 1996). Voted as one of the most scenic Interstates in the US and the only one in the southeast by the American Automobile Association (AAA), the Corridor provides opportunities for a variety of recreational and sightseeing activities. In 1992, the total number of visitors to parks administered by the National Park Services within the Corridor accounted for 59% of the total visitors to Virginia (CTR, 1996). The I-81 Corridor is connected to three other major Interstates (Figure 3), namely, I-64, I-66, and I-77, that connect to other areas within Virginia. It also connects to other major highways such as US 58, US 220, US 460, US 33, US 211, and US 17. US 11 runs along with I-81, intertwining around it and intersecting it at several locations along the entire length of the Corridor. 81 Winchester Strasburg 66 Staunton 64 64 Lexington 77 Wytheville Bristol 77 81 Figure 3. Major Interstate Connections (Source: CTR, 1996) Constructed approximately three decades ago, I-81 now experiences Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes ranging anywhere between 20,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day. Over the last twenty-five years, the AADT has nearly tripled, especially in urban areas (VDOT, 1996a). The Corridor registered a 5% increase in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from 1993 to 1994 (VDOT, 1994). The type of traffic using the facility includes daily commuters between urban areas along the Corridor, tourists, long distance travelers, and commercial traffic. A high percentage of this traffic constitutes trucks. I-81 typically carries truck traffic anywhere between 19 to 40 percent of the total traffic, depending on the time of the day and the section under consideration. Table 1 gives a summary of the characteristic features of I-81 in Virginia. Introduction 2

Table 1. Characteristic Features of I-81 in Virginia Item Length, Highway Type, and Terrain I-81 Characteristic Feature Approximately 850 miles between Knoxville, TN and Watertown, NY In VA, it spans approximately 325 miles Four-lane, divided, restricted access highway characterized mainly by rolling terrain Population Served I-81 cuts through seven planning districts (1-7), comprising 21 cities and towns and 32 counties, with a population of 1.2 million (19% of Virginia s total population in 1991) Major connecting Interstates and Highways I-77, I-66, and I-64 US 58, US 220, US 460, US 33, US 211, US 17, and US 11 Annual Average Daily Anywhere between 20,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day Traffic Volumes (1996) Vehicle Miles Traveled 9.49 million in 1993, increased by 5% to 9.94 million in 1994 Type of Traffic Daily commuters, tourists, long distance travelers, and commercial traffic Truck Percentage Ranges between 19 to 40 percent (1996) The aging of Interstate 81 and increasing traffic volumes have necessitated reconstruction and maintenance activities along the entire length of the Corridor. The high percentage of truck traffic and rolling terrain characteristics of I-81 make it essential to construct dedicated climbing lanes for truck traffic at certain steep sections of the Corridor. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) estimates that the widening of I-81 will be a long and expensive project taking more than 20 years to complete and costing at least two billion dollars (VDOT, 1996a). In light of the level of construction and maintenance activities planned for the Corridor, its rolling terrain characteristics leading to limited sight distance on horizontal and vertical curves, and the nature and volume of traffic, due emphasis needs to be given to traffic safety issues on the Corridor. Introduction 3

The large number of construction and maintenance activities planned for I-81 in Virginia shows that work zones will be a common feature along the Corridor for the next twenty years or more. Past accident records show that I-81 in Virginia has been experiencing a rising trend in the number of total and fatal work zone-related accidents for the years 1991 to 1994. A high percentage of these accidents involved trucks. Rear-end collisions and fixed-object off road were the two major collision types recorded. Major accident causes included driver inattention, exceeding safe speed, and following too close. These facts emphasize the growing problem of work zone safety and traffic control in the Corridor. Several technological innovations have been developed to enhance work zone safety and facilitate traffic control. The static nature of these devices limits their capabilities in resolving work zone-related issues. The development of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) has paved the path for the development of real-time advanced warning and traffic control systems for work zones. These real-time systems enhance work zone safety and control by providing dynamic/real-time reports and warnings on the status of traffic within the work zone to the motorists. This report describes the development of functional and system requirements for real-time advanced warning and traffic control systems and identifies evaluation criteria, measures of effectiveness (MOEs), and issues related to the evaluation of these systems. 1.2 Problem Statement The I-81 corridor is one of the most traversed interstates in Virginia. Linking several economic hubs, the corridor carries an Average Annual Daily Traffic volume (AADT) as high as 50,000, a significant portion of which comprises truck traffic. Constructed thirty years ago and designed to carry 15% truck traffic, I-81 now carries traffic far beyond its planned capacity, with up to 40% truck traffic on some sections (VDOT, 1996a). Several widening and improvement projects have been proposed and planned to accommodate the growing and changing nature of traffic on the I-81 Corridor. The entire widening may take more than 20 years to complete and could cost approximately two billion dollars. The VDOT six-year improvement plan (1997-2002) shows 57 widening and improvement Introduction 4

projects planned for I-81 with an estimated cost of 568 million dollars. This shows the level of work zone activities planned and consequently the importance of having safe and efficient construction and maintenance zones. Construction and maintenance zones pose a serious hazard to motorists who are accustomed to a clear and unobstructed highway. Statistics from the Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) show that national work zone fatalities are increasing with a maximum of 833 fatalities in 1994, a 29% increase over the number in 1992 (NHTSA, 1994). In several states, work zone accidents comprise about two to three percent of total accidents. For the state of Virginia, a total of 1,981 work zone accidents were recorded during the period 1991-1994 (provided by VDOT). These work zone accidents showed an increasing trend from 362 accidents in 1991 to 461 accidents for the year 1994. Another interesting fact is that the rate of fatal accidents has also increased every year. The I-81 Corridor in Virginia has been experiencing similar trends in work zone accidents. For the period 1991-1994, a total of 68 work zone accidents (1% of total work zone accidents in Virginia) were observed on the corridor; 7% of these accidents were fatal and 35% of them involved a truck (based on data provided by VDOT). Detailed analysis of work zone accidents showed that the most typical collision type was rear-end collision followed by fixed object, off road. The top two causes attributed to work zone accidents were driver inattention and exceeding safe speed limit. Studies also indicate that the taper zone, advance zone, and buffer area are the most accident prone locations within work zones. A review of these past work zone accident experiences outlines a cause of concern in terms of traffic and worker safety. As per federal requirements, all highway agencies are to follow a set of guidelines for work zone safety and traffic control. The agencies may use the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to meet the required standards, or they can adopt their own guidelines which should be consistent with those provided by the MUTCD. VDOT has developed a Virginia Work Area Protection Manual to meet the standards and requirements set forth by the MUTCD. The manual provides fundamental principles and Introduction 5

guidelines for the use of traffic control devices to enhance work zone safety and traffic control. Besides the traffic control devices and strategies provided by the MUTCD, several innovative technologies and systems have been developed to enhance work zone safety and facilitate traffic control. These include innovations such as the work zone intrusion alarm, portable rumble strips, lightweight changeable message signs, unmanned radars, solar-assisted arrowboards, flashing stop/slow paddles, and barrier lighting units. The above mentioned innovations provide means to enhance safety and traffic control at work zones. These innovations are static means of providing assistance to motorists regarding safety and traffic control and do not provide real-time information on the status of traffic, nor do they give advisory alternate route information as per need. Some of these devices, such as the portable rumble strips, have even been found to be ineffective in enhancing work zone safety. The static nature and inconsistency of the information disseminated make motorists lose trust in the information provided, thereby reducing the credibility of the messages. Based on all the information presented above, the major problems experienced at work zones may be summarized as follows: Increasing fatality rate for work zone accidents High percentage of work zone-related accidents High percentage of rear-end collisions and fixed-object off road collisions Driver inattention and speeding within work zones Improper driving behavior leading to accidents at specific locations within the work zone Lack of dynamic advanced warning and credible, real-time information dissemination With a huge number of construction and maintenance activities planned for the next twenty years, growing traffic volumes, changing nature of traffic, and past accident experience on the I-81 corridor, there are concerns regarding work zone safety and traffic control. Implementation of a real-time advanced warning and traffic control system may be Introduction 6

a viable solution to efficiently manage traffic and enhance safety at work zones. Before the implementation of such a real-time system, there is a need to develop the functional and system requirements for the real-time advanced warning and traffic control system, keeping in mind the special characteristics and its applicability to the I-81 Corridor. Evaluation criteria and Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) for the real-time system needs to be identified. These may be used for the evaluation of the system to ensure its effectiveness in fulfilling its primary objectives. Given below is a brief description of the objectives and tasks involved in this research. 1.2.1 Research Objectives and Tasks In view of the traffic volumes, special characteristics, and future reconstruction activities planned for I-81, there is an identified need to deploy real-time advanced warning and traffic control systems to help reduce the impacts of these activities on traffic flow and safety. Before deploying such a real-time system, there is a need to define the system and functional requirements. A set of evaluation criteria, as well as measures of effectiveness, need to be identified to ensure the effectiveness of the system in reducing work zone problems. The following sections describe the major objectives and specific tasks associated with this research. The major objectives of this research are: Development of Functional and System Requirements for the Real-Time Advanced Warning and Traffic Control System The specific nature of implementation of the real-time systems for work zones requires that specific functional and system requirements be developed. The functional requirements for the system define the specific functions the system should incorporate in order to tackle and resolve the traffic safety and control problems experienced at work zones. Each function may include several sub-functions. In addition to the functional requirements, the system must possess basic features that are deemed Introduction 7

necessary for its application to work zones. These may be included under system requirements. There is a very fine line distinguishing the functional requirements from the system requirements. The system requirements basically define hardware requirements that are necessary for the system deployment. Since the real-time advanced warning and traffic control system is primarily being developed for work zones on the I-81 corridor, due consideration needs to be taken to cater to the special geographic and traffic characteristics of the corridor. Identification of Evaluation Criteria and Measures of Effectiveness and Examination of Related Issues Another objective of this research is the identification of evaluation criteria and measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for the real-time advanced warning and traffic control system. After the system is developed, there is a need to evaluate the system to ensure its effectiveness in fulfilling its primary objectives, namely, traffic control and safety at work zones. The system will be evaluated for its effectiveness using a set of evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria would test the system for characteristics such as functionality, ease in operation, and accuracy. Measures of effectiveness for the identified evaluation criteria will also be developed. Additionally, the various issues involved in the evaluation of the system using the evaluation criteria and the MOEs will be identified and examined in detail. The various tasks involved in completing this project are: Literature Review The first task for this project is a detailed literature review. A review of work zonerelated accidents and technologies developed to enhance work zone safety and traffic control will be performed. Introduction 8

Development of Functional Requirements Functional requirements for the real-time advanced warning and traffic control system will be developed. This is to ensure the functionality and reliability of the system for usage specific to work zones on the I-81 corridor. Development of System Requirements Overall system requirements will be developed. These requirements ensure that the system as a whole possesses specific characteristics such as portability, adaptability, and cost effectiveness, which are essential for work zone applications. Identification of Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria to ensure the effectiveness of the system in fulfilling its objectives and goals will be identified. Identification of Measures of Effectiveness Measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for the evaluation criteria will be identified. These MOEs may be used during the final evaluation of the system. Examination of Issues Related to Evaluation Several issues related to the evaluation of the system will be identified and examined. 1.3 Organization of this Report This report is organized into eight chapters. The first chapter provides a background of the I-81 Corridor in Virginia, its characteristics, and work zone-related issues and concerns, identifying the motivation behind this research. Chapter 2 provides a detailed summary of the literature reviewed for this project. The main issues summarized include national work zone safety and control issues, and work zone-related issues specific to I-81 in Virginia. Literature on technological innovations to enhance work zone safety was also reviewed and summarized. Chapter 3 provides a case for the need for real-time advanced warning and traffic control systems to enhance work zone safety and facilitate traffic control. Currently available real-time work zone systems are also reviewed as part of this chapter. The fourth chapter gives a detailed description of the functional and system Introduction 9

requirements essential for the development of a real-time advanced warning and traffic control system. Considerations for a system architecture are also discussed as part of the fourth chapter. Chapter 5 identifies the evaluation criteria and potential measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for the system. It also examines and discusses the various issues involved in system evaluation. Chapter 6 provides a conclusion for this project and recommendations for future research. Chapter 7 provides a list of references used in this project. Introduction 10