Watershed and Water Quality Modeling to Support TMDL Determinations Lake Oologah

Similar documents
Appendix B EFDC Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model. Draft Lake Thunderbird TMDL Report

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

Application of the 3D model ELCOM CAEDYM to estimate phosphorus load reduction needs for Lake Wister, OK

The Myakka River. Presented to the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council January 9, 2009

Leesville Lake Water Quality Monitoring

Arkansas Water Resources Center

What s Happening in Lake Whatcom?

Lake Pepin. TMDL Basics

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

Boy Lake CASS COUNTY

Appendix 5. Fox River Study Group Interim Monitoring Evaluation

Draft Wasteload Allocation Report Town of Haworth

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Virginia and North Carolina (Section 216)

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

Portage Lake Hubbard County

WILLAMETTE RIVER AND COLUMBIA RIVER WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION MODEL

Crystal Lake and Keller Lake Water Quality Evaluation and Ferric Chloride Treatment Project

Kansas Case Study Kanopolis Reservoir and Salina, KS

Lake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead. August 2008 Sector Meetings. Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

Overview of Models for Estimating Pollutant Loads & Reductions

Relationships between Residence Time and Cyanobacterial Blooms in a Nutrient-Rich River System

An Introduction to The Ecology of Lakes, Ponds and Reservoirs. Developing a Management Plan

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Science Supporting Policy: The Case For Flow Quantity

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

Hydrology, Water Quality, and Phosphorus Loading of Little St. Germain Lake, Vilas County, Wisconsin

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

Session 2 Biodiversity Conservation

Status and Trends of Water Quality in Wisconsin s Lakes, Streams, and Rivers

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT 2013 SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE. Clean Water Act Section 106 October 1, 2012 September 31, 2013 Grant #: I 00E57603

(including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson)

Minnesota River Basin Turbidity TMDL

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

Potter Lake. University of Kansas Lawrence Campus, Douglas County, Kansas. Water Quality Evaluation January 13, 2014

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Analysis of PL-566 Reservoir Production Responses Along a Nutrient Loading Gradient

Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY MODELING USING INTEGRATED WATERSHED AND LAKE MODELS IN SUPPORT OF THE GEORGIA COMPREHENSIVE STATEWIDE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Task 1: Framework for a Reexamination. Falls Nutrient Strategy

FINAL 2012 BACTERIA AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR THE RED RIVER, OKLAHOMA (OK311100, OK311200, OK311210, OK311510, OK311600, OK311800)

Nutrients and Ecosystems

ALMY POND TMDL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua has Positive Long-Term Effects. Biological Help for the Human Race

Electric Forward Market Report

Effectiveness of Coanda Screens for Removal of Sediment, Nutrients, and Metals from Urban Runoff

Nutrients & Algal Blooms Developing water quality standards for the James River.

Nutrient Removal Mechanisms in a Cold Climate Gravel Wetland Alison Watts, Robert Roseen, Kim Farah, Heather Gilbert, Jamie Houle

MARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Qian Zhang (UMCES / CBPO) Joel Blomquist (USGS / ITAT)

PHOSPHORUS LOADING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality: Modeling for TMDL Studies

AP Environmental Science

Climate Change & Urbanization Have Changed River Flows in Ontario

Particulate Soil Phosphorus and Eutrophication in Lakes and Streams

SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS & LOW FLOW PROTECTION POLICY MICHAEL COLLEGE, P.E. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Causes of Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia

Runoff Risk: A Decision Support Tool for Nutrient Applications

Using Weather Forecasting For Decision Tools For Animal Agriculture

Lake Magda Nutrient TMDL FINAL

Water Chemistry. Water 101

Chapter Seven: Factors Affecting the Impact of Nutrient Enrichment on the Lower Estuary

Welcome to Round 3 of the Zumbro River WRAPS Meetings Held in Theilman, Oronoco, and Rochester on November 15 and 16, 2016

Water quality monitoring and assessment: general principles and fitness for purpose

Water quality modelling to support the operation of the Kakhovka Reservoir, Dnieper River, Ukraine

The Confluence Model. Presentation to Modeling and Forecasting Working Group January 21, 2015

Mathematical models in predicting the fate of Lake Pyhäjärvi waters


FINAL TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD FOR BLACK BEAR CREEK, OKLAHOMA ( _00)

Modeling Chester River Water Quality...

ARKANSAS NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT. EPA Region 6 Nutrient RTAG Dallas, Texas April 14, 2015

Calculating growth rate of water hyacinth pollution wise (in relation to trophic state)

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

Aquatic Ecosystems of the Pittsburgh District

General Instream Flow Methods Overview. Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24, 2011

DES MOINES RIVER RESERVOIRS WATER CONTROL PLAN UPDATES IOWA ASCE WATER RESOURCES DESIGN CONFERENCE

Chesapeake Bay. report card

Biscayne Bay. A Jewel in Jeopardy? Stephen Blair 1 and Sarah Bellmund 2

Prepared by: Capitol Region Watershed District and Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. DRAFT Como Lake TMDL. February 22, water ecology community

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

Dead-Zones and Coastal Eutrophication: Case- Study of Chesapeake Bay W. M. Kemp University of Maryland CES Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge, MD

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

D. Common Water Quality Models

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Related content PAPER OPEN ACCESS

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

TURBINE VENTING FOR DISSOLVED OXYGEN IMPROVEMENTS AT BULL SHOALS, NORFORK, AND TABLE ROCK DAMS

Comparative Analysis of Minnesota Lakes Treated with Alum to Inform Spring Lake Treatment

Modeling Fate and Effects of Multiple Stressors on a Use- Impaired River

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Missouri River Basin Water Management

United Water Conservation District November 2016 Hydrologic Conditions Report 2017 Water Year. December 6, 2016

Information Request 11

Nutrient Sources, Fate, Transport, and Effects Study of Galveston Bay, Texas Rachel Windham,

Preserving Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee, Israel) as a strategic water resource in a changing climate

Using Paired Edge of Field Data to Assess Impacts of Management on Surface and Subsurface P Loss

State Water Resources Monitoring Priorities and Role of Citizen Based Monitoring Tim Asplund, WDNR April 5, 2013

Transcription:

Watershed and Water Quality Modeling to Support TMDL Determinations Lake Oologah 26 th Annual Conference Oklahoma Clean Lakes and Watersheds Association (OCLWA) April 5-6, 2017 Stillwater, Oklahoma

Lake Oologah Watershed-Lake Model Verdigris River Basin Pollutant Sources Designated Uses Water quality impairments Watershed Model Lake Model Model Results Model Application

Lake Oologah Verdigris River Basin Area upstream of lake is 4,339 sq-miles (23% in OK) 31,040 acre USACE reservoir Public water supply for Tulsa, Public Service of OK; Collinsville, Chelsea, Claremore; RWDs Rogers, Nowata, Washington Co. Point source wastewater Nonpoint source runoff from urban/rural areas

Designated Uses 303(d) Impairments and WQ Targets Flood control, water supply, recreation, navigation, fish and wildlife propagation Impaired for Warm Water Fish and Wildlife Propagation Classified as eutrophic lake by Trophic State Index (TSI) Annual 90 th percentile Turbidity < 25 NTU Surface DO > 5 mg/l Lake volume DO: < 50% can be < 2 mg/l during stratified season

EFDC HSPF Management Scenarios Flow, Loads Watershed Hydrodynamics Sediment Transport Water Quality Sediment Bed & Flux Water Quality Targets

HSPF Watershed Model Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran Sub-watersheds Rainfall/meteorology Topography Land uses/soil types Stream channels Overland flow Infiltration/groundwater Flow (Q) and WQ (TSS, Wtemp, DO, BOD, N, P, Algae)

HSPF Watershed Model Middle Verdigris 59 Sub-Watersheds 2 Yrs Calibration, 2004-2005 2 Yrs Validation, 2006-2007 2006 drought year Flow (USGS) WQ (EPA, OWRB, USACE) State variables are Flow, TSS, Water Temperature, DO, BOD, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Algae

Flow and TP: Middle Verdigris R Flow (cfs) USGS 07171000 2006-2007 Lenapah, OK TP (mg/l) USACE VR-2 2006-2007 TP (mg/l)

Lake Oologah Conceptual Model Mass balance causeeffect watershed flow, loading & lake WQ response Riverine, transition, lacustrine zones affect transport and WQ in reservoir Summer stratified Winter well-mixed Hypolimnetic DO depletion controlled by stratification/sod Internal source of nutrients from sediment bed

Boeckmann (2010) Nowata Star, Jun 18,2003

Chlorophyll a (ug/l) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) WQ Impact of Zebra Mussels? 16 14 Legend OOL-1-Data Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Bottom DO OOL_1 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days) 40 30 Legend OOL-1-Data Jan 2006-Dec 2007 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Sfc Chl-a OOL_1 20 10 0 Dec-05 Feb-06 Apr-06 Jun-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Dec-06 Feb-07 Apr-07 Jun-07 Aug-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 Time (days)

Chlorophyll a (ug/l) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) WQ Impact of Zebra Mussels? 16 14 12 Legend OOL-1-Data OOL-1-Model (Layer 1) OOL-1-Data Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Bottom DO OOL_1 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days) Model without Zebra Mussels 40 Legend OOL-1-Data OOL-1-Model (Layer 5) OOL-1-Data 30 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Sfc Chl-a OOL_1 20 10 0 Dec-05 Feb-06 Apr-06 Jun-06 Aug-06 Oct-06 Dec-06 Feb-07 Apr-07 Jun-07 Aug-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 Time (days)

EFDC Surface Water Model Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code EFDC Model Hydrodynamics Water Quality Sediment Transport Toxics Sediment Diagenesis

Lake Model Data Data Set Lake bathymetry, water level, dam releases Watershed flow/loads Wastewater flow/loads Meteorology WQ (T,DO,TSS,N,P,Chl, Secchi, Turbidity) Sediment bed (TP, TKN, TOC, solids) Data Source USACE Tulsa District & City of Tulsa Oologah Lake Watershed Assessment Study (2012) HSPF watershed model NPDES DMR records Oklahoma Mesonet USACE WQ and Sediment Bed Chemistry, 5 sites

EFDC Lake Model Oolagah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Bottom Elev (m) 173.609 2006-01-01 00 194.535 888 Cells 5 Layers OOL_1 OOL_3 OOL_2 OOL_5 OOL_4 External Load: HSPF & WWTP (Flow, WQ), AtmDep (N,P) Hydro: Lake level, Temp Sediment: TSS, BedSolids WQ: Chl, DO, C, N,P Internal Load: SOD, N,P fluxes, Bed C,N,P Cal/Val: 4 sites, 2 yrs, 1/2006-12/2007

Turbidity (NTU) Turbidity Storm: July 1-2, 2007 225 Oolagah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model 200 175 Turbidity: Sfc OOL_3 Legend Turbidity Model (NTU) OOL_3 (Sfc) Turbidity Obs (NTU) OOL_3 (Sfc) 150 125 100 TSS vs Turbidity 75 50 25 0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days)

Flow (m 3 /s) TSS, Storm: July 1-2, 2007 Flow (cms) Verdigris R, Lenapah, OK 4500 4000 3500 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Boundary Condition Time Series Legend Flow, Series:Verdigris River 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Animation Bottom TSS 0 20-Jun-2007 25-Jun-2007 30-Jun-2007 05-Jul-2007 10-Jul-2007 15-Jul-2007 Time (days) Storm: July 1-2, 2007

Chlorophyll a (ug/l) Secchi Depth (m) Secchi Depth and Chlorophyll 2.5 2.0 Legend i=43,j=33, OOL_3 Obs Data OOL-3 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Secchi Depth Secchi: OOL_3 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days) 40 30 Legend OOL-2-Model (Layer 5) OOL-2-Data Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Chl-a: OOL_2 20 10 0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days)

Dissolved Temperature Oxygen ( C) (mg/l) Dissolved Oxygen 40 16 35 14 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary Legend Legend OOL-1-Model OOL-1-Model (Layer 5) (Layer 5) OOL-1-Data (Sfc) OOL-1-Data (Sfc) OOL-1-Model OOL-1-Model (Layer 1) (Layer 1) OOL-1-Data (Bottom) OOL-1-Data (Bottom) Sfc & Bot DO: OOL_1 30 12 25 10 208 156 104 52 0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days)

Storm: July 1-2, 2007 Anoxic Volume 2006-2007 Jun-July-Aug 2007 Storm Event July 1-2, 2007

Anoxic Volume Jun-July-Aug 2007 Animation Jun 9-Jul 27 Storm Event July 1-2, 2007 Animation

Total Phosphate (mg/l) Total P (mg/l) Nutrients (TP and PO4) 0.5 0.4 Legend OOL-2-Model (Layer 5) OOL-2-Data Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary TP: OOL_2 (Sfc) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days) 0.5 0.4 Legend OOL-2-Model (Layer 5) OOL-2-Data Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Calibration Results: Time Series Summary PO4: OOL_2 (Sfc) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days)

EFDC Sediment Flux Model POM Biological Production Detritus Deposition Internal Loading SOD Benthic Flux N Benthic Flux P Particulate Organic C,N,P Water Sediment Bed Decay Burial Dissolved Inorganic C,N,P

Sediment Bed Chemistry USACE Survey in Aug- 2000 TP, TKN, TOC Bulk density; % Solids; % Sand, Silt, Clay Initial conditions for Sediment Flux Model based on USACE bed chemistry data, 5 sites

Phosphate Flux (g/m 2 /day) 0.016 0.012 Sediment Flux PO4: Model & Observed 16 mg P m -2 day -1 Legend i=48,j=4 OOL_1 i=43,j=33 OOL_3 i=41,j=43 OOL_4 Oologah Lake Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model Benthic Phosphate Flux OOL_4 0.008 OOL_3 0.004 OOL_1 0.000 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Time (days) Jan 2006-Dec 2007 (Dzialowski & Carter, OSU) N=17 Central Plains reservoirs

How Well Did Model Perform? Hydrodynamics: Simulated seasonal trends of water temperature and stratification Water Quality: Matched seasonal trends of DO, nutrients, chlorophyll, and secchi depth Sediment Flux: Internal benthic flux of phosphate comparable to observations from other mesotrophic and eutrophic Central Plains reservoirs

Zebra Mussels WQ in 2006 (ZM present) vs. 2007 (ZM absent)? WQ change not detected in USACE station data WQ impact of ZM in Lake Oologah may be localized? ZM in Lake Hefner (2016) Recommend monitoring of ZM to track density and WQ over the years 2016 Distribution https://nas.er.usgs.gov/taxgroup/mollusks/zebramussel/

Summary HSPF watershed and EFDC lake model provides DEQ with a defensible tool for WQ assessments Water quality targets are DO and turbidity Model will be used by DEQ to support TMDL determinations for Lake Oologah (TN, TP, TSS)

Lake Oologah Watershed-Lake Model Questions & Discussion Andy Stoddard Dynamic Solutions, LLC www.dsllc.com astoddard@dsllc.com (540)338-3642