Special Report. Uranium Production Cost Study. August 2015 UXC.COM A PUBLICATION OF

Similar documents
Uranium 2016: Resources, Production and Demand. Executive Summary NEA NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY

Silex Systems Limited 2015 Annual General Meeting (ASX: SLX) (OTCQX: SILXY)

Uranium Mining and the Nuclear Renaissance

Uranium Operations. Uranium Strategy. Exploration Potential. Uranium Investing in clean electricity

RESOURCE GOLD PTY. LTD.

AuRico Gold Provides Monthly Update on Young-Davidson Ore Processing Underway

Worldwide ISL Uranium Mining Outlook

Uranium in Saskatchewan

White Dam Gold Project Dump Leach

Harikrishnan Hari Tulsidas

Uranium 2014: Resources, Production and Demand NEA. Executive Summary

Uranium in Saskatchewan

Forward Looking Statement

Uranium mining legal and regulatory framework

Drilling, metallurgical test work and a new resource model add 21% to oxide gold reserves

Olympias: Highlights Q Phase 1 Retreatment. Acquired from European Goldfields in February. EIA approved. Phase 1 Retreatment began

THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR FUEL SUPPLY

RE: REVIEW OF THE PRAIRIE CREEK MINE SCOPING STUDY

For personal use only

Cut and fill productivity. Operating procedures. Introduction. 1. Approach of the model

Uranium Production and Processing: an Introduction

SILVERCORP REPORTS SILVER PRODUCTION OF 5.0 MILLION OUNCES, CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONS OF $31.9 MILLION, OR $0

Extracting uranium from its ores

Documentation Management

A world in transition: PwC s 2017 APEC CEO Survey, November APEC CEO Survey. Indonesia findings.

Magnetite A Higher Grade Blast Furnace Feed and its Potential Benefits for the Ironmaker

Evaluation of Grade Engineering using Enterprise Optimization. Michael Scott, Nick Redwood

THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS Resource Technologies: Innovative Customer Solutions

SILVERCORP REPORTS Q3 RESULTS: NET INCOME OF $12.7 MILLION, $0.08 PER SHARE AND PROVIDES FISCAL 2019 PRODUCTION AND CASH COSTS GUIDANCE

Estimates on uranium supply on a mineby-mine

OUTOTEC TOMRA SENSOR-BASED ORE SORTING SOLUTIONS BENEFITS

Short Term Energy Outlook March 2011 March 8, 2011 Release

The End of Cheap Uranium

New AREVA: Reliable Integrated European supplier

URANIUM MINING IN MALAWI BY PATRICK MEDIUS NYIRENDA ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY AND MINING, MALAWI

Maritime Shipping Forecast

McClean Lake Site Guide. AREVA Resources Canada Inc.

Minco Plc Woodstock Manganese Property

Market Alert. China NPK Statistical Update February Highlights. China Plant Nutrient Exports. Exports

China Trends and forecasts Iron ore International dry bulk trade. Dry Bulk Shipping Steel products. Coking coal. Iron ore resources

OCEANAGOLD PROVIDES AN UPDATE TO HAILE COMMISSIONING AND REVISED COMPANY GUIDANCE

At Home in North America

A Practical Guide to US Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Economics

White Paper. Fire Sprinkler Riser Corrosion. (May 2014) Jeffrey Kochelek (Engineered Corrosion Solutions, LLC) V.1.0.1

North River Resources plc / Ticker: NRRP / Index: AIM / Sector: Mining 30 June 2014 North River Resources plc ( North River or the Company )

Resource Efficient Mining Processes of Tomorrow

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Global Mining Solutions From concept through closure

930 West 1 st Street, Suite 202, North Vancouver, BC V7P 3N4. Tel: (604) Tel:

HELLENIC COPPER MINES LTD. History of the Company

Summary of analyst presentation 26 February Summary of analysts presentation by:

AustralianBusinessExecutive.com.au. Made possible by the participation of: South Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy (SACOME)

THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

What is Enterprise Optimisation?

OPEC World Oil Outlook edition

ConverDyn and Uranium Conversion

19 th Zinc and its Markets Seminar May 4 th 6 th, 2015 Radisson Blu Royal Hotel, Helsinki, Finland. Welcome address. Robin Lindahl

AMUR MINERALS CORPORATION (AIM: AMC) Independent Review of Cost Estimates $1.78 Per Pound Nickel Cost to Deliver to Rail Station

For personal use only

IDM Mining Updates Pre-Development Engineering and Optimization at Red Mountain Gold Project

IMPROVING EFFICIENCIES: THE ROLE OF PROCESS AUDITS

BUCHANS MINERALS SUCCESSFULLY PRODUCES HIGH PURITY MANGANESE ELECTROLYTE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTROLYTIC MANGANESE METAL

A Tailor Made Approach for the Beneficiation of Phosphate Rock

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 12 MAY 2016

21 st Metal Bulletin Bauxite and Alumina Conference

Kibali Mine Development

KOCH Transporttechnik. Bernie H. Loyer, VP Minerals Technology, FFE Minerals

ENERGY DEMAND AND SUPPLY ELASTICITIES

International activity of the State Corporation «Rosatom»: NFC market services

HEAP LEACHING TECHNOLOGY Moving the frontier for treatment

Voisey s Bay Project Update

Base Metals Capability Profile

Criteria for Selecting a Jig or DMS

REQUEST FOR RESEARCH PROPOSALS (October September 2003 Funding Cycle)

Strata Energy. A Design-Build Success Story

Nuclear Fuel Supply. URENCO s Perspective. 15 November Copyright 2017 URENCO Limited

Corvus Gold Receives Sulfide Gold Recovery of +90% Using AAO Process at the North Bullfrog Project, Nevada

Prepared for: Current Trends in Mining Finance Conference New York April 28, 2015

STARVED ACID LEACH TECHNOLOGY (SALT) CONCEPTUAL STUDY. InCoR Holdings Plc MINING AND METALLURGY. April 2014 REPORT Rev. 00 > Internal ref.

Confidence in Carrapateena project grows

BP Energy Outlook 2016 edition

Newmont Reports 2017 Reserves and Resources; Reserve additions replace depletion, Resources increase

ArcelorMittal, Canada

Hydro takes over Vale s aluminium business in transforming transaction

The Global Management Challenge for Chinese Nuclear

Ste De Maisonneuve Blvd W Montréal, QC H3A 3L4 Tel: Fax:

Iván Arriagada, CEO Antofagasta Minerals. Producer Challenges

THE NOLANS RARE EARTHS PROJECT

Outotec OreMet Optimizer

For personal use only. Minerals Explorer in South Korea

Vanadium: Recession, Rebalance & Resilience By Kenneth D. Zenkevich Stratcor, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; U.S.A.

Santacruz Silver Reports First Quarter 2017 Production and Financial Results

Manganese ore: Where is the recovery?

ABM Hits 3000 Ounce Target from Trial Mining

In Situ and Dump Leaching of Phosphate Rock

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 13 December 2011 ASX Code: BDR TUCANO GOLD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND MINING UPDATE

Global Mining Industry Software Market

SECTION 14.0 CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES

NICKEL INTRODUCTION: USES OF NICKEL

Reference Materials Overview of Coal Industry

Transcription:

Special Report August 2015 A PUBLICATION OF UXC.COM Uranium Production Cost Study 1501 MACY DRIVE ROSWELL, GA 30076 PH +1 770 642-7745 FX +1 770 643-2954

NOTICE The Ux Consulting Company, LLC ( UxC ) shall have title to, ownership of, and all proprietary rights in this Report. Under United States federal copyright law (17 USC 101 et seq.) it is illegal to reproduce this Report by any means without written permission from UxC. The information contained in this Report is obtained from sources that UxC believes to be reliable. UxC makes no warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this Report and UxC, to the maximum extent permitted by law, assumes no liability for the use or effects of any of the information or data contained in this Report. It is UxC s strict policy not to endorse, promote, or recommend any particular securities, currencies, or other financial products or instruments. Nothing contained in this Report is intended to constitute investment, legal, tax, accounting or other professional advice and the reader should not rely on the information provided in this Report for making financial decisions. The Ux U 3O 8 Price and other Ux Price indicators are developed by The Ux Consulting Company, LLC (UxC) and are proprietary and exclusive intellectual property of UxC. These price indicators are provided to UxC s customers through the Ux Weekly publication and are made available on UxC s public website solely at UxC s discretion. They may not be reproduced or otherwise used without UxC s express permission. UxC, Ux Weekly, Ux U 3O 8 Price, Ux, and Ux Consulting, U-PRICE, and SWU-PRICE are trademarks of The Ux Consulting Company, LLC.

Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction and Overview 6 Introduction... 6 Structure of Report... 7 1 Key Factors Affecting Production Costs 9 Ore Grade... 9 Reserve Tonnage... 10 Deposit Depth... 10 Spatial Density... 10 Ore Thickness... 10 Deposit Composition & Chemical Agents... 11 Technical... 11 Water Flows and Drainage... 12 Life of Project... 12 Energy Costs... 12 Labor Costs... 13 Transportation/Hauling Costs... 14 Environmental and Regulatory... 14 Political... 15 Taxes and Royalties... 15 2 Uranium Mining Methods 19 Open Pit... 20 Issues Related to Handling Uranium Ore in Open Pits... 21 Hydrogeology... 21 Waste Handling... 21 Ore Handling... 21 Equipment... 21 Scanning... 22 Decommissioning tailings containment... 22 Underground Mining... 22 Sedimentary Ores... 22 Vein Type Ores... 23 Issues Related to Handling Uranium Ores in Underground Projects... 24 Access to the reserve... 24 Primary Mining Equipment... 24 Station Area... 24 Primary Haulage Development... 24 Raises (Manways and Ore Passes)... 25 Stope Development (Sub Level Ore Development)... 25 Ore Extraction... 26 Ventilation... 26 Backfill... 26 Manpower (Staffing)... 26 Mine Equipment... 27 Personal Protective Equipment... 27 Safety and Health... 27 Reclamation... 27 Stope Leaching... 28 In situ leaching (ISL)... 28 Criteria for Choosing Leaching Chemistry... 30 Principal Processes for ISL... 31 Beneficiation... 32 Radiometric Ore Sorting (ROS)... 32 Magnetic Sorting... 33 Gravimetric Sorting... 33 Grain Size Classification... 33 Flotation... 34 2015 UxC 1

Table of Contents Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 Mechanized Shedding... 34 Screening... 34 Ore Processing... 35 Mill Processing... 35 Crushing & Grinding... 35 Leaching... 35 Solid-Liquid Separation Process... 36 Uranium Extraction... 37 Precipitation... 38 Separate Solids + Drying... 39 Heap Leach (HL) Processing... 39 HL Pad Construction... 40 Ore Heaps Building... 40 Heap Leaching Process... 41 Heap Leach Time... 41 Ore Removal... 41 Future Trends... 41 Uranium from Phosphoric Acid... 42 Wet Process Phosphoric Acid Recovery (WPPA)... 43 Advanced Technologies for Extracting Uranium from Phosphoric Acid... 43 3 Uranium Mining Costs 44 Mine Capital Costs... 44 Open Pit... 44 Underground... 44 In-Situ Recovery (ISR)... 45 4 Uranium Processing and Milling Costs 47 Milling Capital Costs... 47 Milling Operating Costs... 47 Direct costs... 47 Indirect Costs... 47 Project Capital Costs (CAPEX)... 48 Acquisition Cost... 48 Mine Development... 48 Civil... 48 Building and Structural Steel... 48 Equipment Supply Costs... 49 Equipment Installation Costs... 49 Instrumentation... 49 Piping... 49 Electrical... 49 Infrastructure Costs... 49 Indirect Construction Costs... 50 Engineering Procurement and Construction Management... 50 Contingency... 50 Project Operating Costs (OPEX)... 50 Labor Costs... 50 Supply Costs... 50 Power Costs... 51 Maintenance Costs... 51 Infrastructure Costs... 51 Administration Costs... 51 Head Office Costs... 51 Cost Model for Acid ISL U Mining and Processing... 52 Cost Model for Alkaline ISL U Mining and Processing... 53 5 Financial & Market Considerations on Costs 55 Time Value of Money... 55 Escalation and Inflation... 55 Market Conditions... 56 2 2015 UxC

Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 Table of Contents 6 World Production Costs 57 All Projects... 57 Operating Projects... 61 Planned Projects... 63 Potential Projects... 65 Production Cost Curve 2015... 68 Production Cost Curve 2020... 69 Production Cost Curve 2025... 70 Production Cost Curve 2030... 71 7 World Production Cost Case vs. Demand (2013-2030) 72 8 Production Costs by Region 75 Africa... 75 Operating... 75 Planned... 76 Potential... 77 Australia... 79 Operating... 79 Planned... 80 Potential... 81 North America... 83 Operating... 83 Planned... 85 Potential... 85 Former Soviet Union and Asia... 88 Operating... 88 Planned... 90 Potential... 91 Competitive Cost Comparison 2014... 92 Africa... 92 Australia... 93 Canada... 94 U.S.... 95 Kazakhstan & Uzbekistan... 96 Russia... 97 9 Production Costs by Mine Method 98 Overview... 98 In-Situ Recovery (ISR)... 100 Open Pit... 103 Underground... 106 10 A Slow Move Back to Normal Queuing 109 11 Financial Implications for Prices 110 Exchange Rates... 110 How Exchange Rates Relate to Cost/Price Estimates... 110 Inflation... 111 Specific vs. General Cost Increases... 111 12 Matching Production Costs to Prices 113 Floor Prices... 113 Long-Term Contract Prices... 113 Spot Prices... 114 The Linkage and De-Linkage of Spot Prices and Production Costs... 115 13 Issues Affecting Next Generation of Projects 116 Lower Grades... 116 Smaller Project Size... 116 2015 UxC 3

List of Figures Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 More Remote Mine Locations... 117 Water/Energy Cost/Conservation... 117 Exploration... 118 Project Financing... 119 SWU Substitution and Depleted Tails... 119 Appendix A Worldwide Production Costs by Project 121 List of Figures Figure 1. ERA Ranger Open Pit Mine... 20 Figure 2. Cigar Lake Underground Mine... 24 Figure 3. ISL Process... 31 Figure 4. Conventional Acid Leach Flow Chart... 36 Figure 5. Typical Uranium Acid Heap Leaching Flowsheet... 41 Figure 6. Production Cost Curve All Projects... 58 Figure 7. Production Cost Curve First Tier... 59 Figure 8. Production Cost Curve Second Tier... 59 Figure 9. Production Cost Curve Third Tier... 60 Figure 10. Production Cost Curve Fourth Tier... 60 Figure 11. Production Cost Curve Operating Projects... 61 Figure 12. Production Cost Curve Planned Projects... 63 Figure 13. Production Cost Curve Potential Projects... 66 Figure 14. 2015 Production Cost Curve... 68 Figure 15. 2020 Production Cost Curve... 69 Figure 16. 2025 Production Cost Curve... 70 Figure 17. 2030 Production Cost Curve... 71 Figure 18. Production by Cost vs. Demand... 72 Figure 19. Production by Cost Africa... 75 Figure 20. Production Cost Curve Africa... 77 Figure 21. Production by Cost Australia... 79 Figure 22. Production Cost Curve Australia... 80 Figure 23. Production By Cost North America... 83 Figure 24. Production Cost Curve North America... 84 Figure 25. Production By Cost Former Soviet Union & Asia... 88 Figure 26. Production Cost Curve Former Soviet Union & Asia... 90 Figure 27. Production by Mine Method... 98 Figure 28. Production by Cost ISR... 100 Figure 29. Production Cost Curve ISR... 101 Figure 30. Production By Cost Open Pit... 103 Figure 31. Production Cost Curve Open Pit... 104 Figure 32. Production By Cost Underground... 106 Figure 33. Production Cost Curve Underground... 107 Figure 34. Movements in Uranium Prices in Terms of Different Currencies... 110 Figure 35. UxC Spot vs. Long-Term Contract Price Indicators, 2004-2015... 114 4 2015 UxC

Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 List of Tables List of Tables Table 1. Sulfuric Acid Costs Select Kazakh Mines... 11 Table 2. Energy Costs Mine(s)/Company... 13 Table 3. U.S. Uranium Tax Rates... 17 Table 4. Australian and Canadian Uranium Tax Rates... 17 Table 5. African and Kazakhstan Uranium Tax Rates... 18 Table 6. World Uranium Production by Mining Method... 19 Table 7. IX vs. SX... 38 Table 8. Uranium Content of Selected World Phosphate Rock... 42 Table 9. Typical Operating Costs Recent Projects... 48 Table 10. Acid ISL Cost Model... 52 Table 11. Alkaline ISL Cost Model... 53 Table 12. Uranium Production Costs Africa... 92 Table 13. Uranium Production Costs Australia... 93 Table 14. Uranium Production Costs Canada... 94 Table 15. Uranium Production Costs U.S.... 95 Table 16. Uranium Production Costs Kazakhstan & Uzbekistan... 96 Table 17. Uranium Production Costs Russia... 97 Table 18. World Uranium Production by Mining Method, 2000-2014... 99 Table 19. Worldwide Production Costs (Ranked) by Project... 121 2015 UxC 5

Introduction and Overview Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 Introduction and Overview Introduction Given the move toward cleaner energy, reduced carbon emissions, and more secure long-term energy sources, uranium supply is becoming more important to utilities worldwide. In the 2013 publication, our post-fukushima demand forecast was more positive, as we projected it to double by 2030. In the current forecast, base case demand is projected to increase by 53% through 2030, which is a significant reduction from two years ago. The majority of the increased demand is still expected to come from Southeast Asia China and India in particular. Although the end of the U.S.-Russia HEU Agreement in 2013 was certainly a positive event for producers seeking to bring online new production, the reduction in demand stemming from the Fukushima accident has essentially negated the loss of 24 million pounds U 3 O 8 per year resulting from the end of the HEU deal. Secondary supply sources also continue to be a huge factor impacting uranium prices and the viability of new and existing uranium projects. Enricher underfeeding has become a very important part of secondary supply in the post-fukushima environment. Even though underfeeding is less profitable given the current low price of uranium, spare enrichment capacity resulting from lower than expected demand (as noted above) is being utilized by enrichers to yield uranium totaling up to 15 million pounds U 3 O 8 e per year. Furthermore, U.S. Government inventories and the use of MOX/Reprocessing meet a comparable amount of demand in the near term. Add to this inventory build-up from shuttered reactors in the wake of the Fukushima disaster, and secondary supplies amount to upward of 40 million pounds U 3 O 8 per annum for the next few years. Given the impact of secondary supplies on the ultimate need for primary production, there is enough prospective production at a loaded production cost below $50 per pound to meet UxC s post-fukushima base case demand through 2020. Accordingly, planned or potential projects with production costs at or above $50 per pound will be forced to delay or defer production until higher demand necessitates this higher cost production. Currently, production at a cost above $50 per pound is seen being more critical in the years leading up to 2025 when global demand increases more sharply. While uranium exploration experienced a revival in the last price run-up, exploration expenditures since the Fukushima accident have fallen off as many suppliers now find it more difficult to obtain project financing in a flat market. As a result, the current menu of worldwide projects is not all that exhaustive because most of the recent exploration has been on brownfield sites that were discovered 20, 30, or even 40 years ago. Although uranium resources within the widely known IAEA Red Book are extensive, the vast majority of these are neither delineated nor developed. As the nuclear industry transforms itself into a safer and more robust industry, one of the 6 2015 UxC

Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 Introduction and Overview Structure of Report challenges will be for the supply side of the industry to expand and bring new production to a market that is still reeling from the effects of Fukushima. This study complements UxC s Uranium Supplier s Annual in identifying where expanded and new uranium supply will come from among 117 worldwide projects to meet future demand through 2030. Cost curves for operational, planned, and potential projects are developed to identify those projects most likely to produce in the future, as well as present a long run cost structure for the industry. Additionally, the study identifies key factors impacting how production costs are calculated as well as their weight in a supplier s decision of whether to advance a project to production. The Uranium Production Cost Study is organized as follows: Chapter 1 Key Factors Affecting Production Costs reviews factors that impact productions costs, including ore grade, reserve tonnage, deposit depth, spatial density, ore thickness, deposit composition and chemical agents, various technical factors, water flows and drainage, energy costs, labor costs, transportation/hauling costs, etc. Chapter 2 Uranium Mining Methods covers the three key mining methods (open pit, underground, and in-situ recovery) in uranium mining and highlights the positives and negatives of each method. In Chapter 3 Uranium Mining Costs, we discuss uranium mining costs for conventional (open pit and underground) and in-situ recovery deposits, specifically focusing on the breakdown of capital costs for each mining method. Specific variables impacting capital mining costs for each mining method are discussed in detail. Chapter 4 Uranium Processing and Milling Costs identifies the capital and operating costs associated with uranium processing plants. This chapter specifically looks at the direct and indirect costs related to total milling operating expenses. Typical operating costs for acid and alkaline leach processing circuits are also presented. Chapter 5 Financial & Market Considerations on Costs discusses the time value of money and how this works in calculating the present value of a project. This chapter also discusses the difference between escalation and inflation and how each can impact the economics of a deposit. Lastly, this chapter focuses on how important market conditions are accounted for in deciding whether to make an investment and development decision. In the following four chapters, we detail estimated production costs for prospective world uranium deposits. Chapter 6 World Production Costs presents a production cost curve for all worldwide uranium projects, breaking the cost curve down by four tiers. Additionally, the production cost curve is broken down by operating, planned, and potential projects. Production cost curves for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 are also presented. Chapter 7 World Production Cost Case vs. Demand (2013-2030) compares UxC s URM High and Base Demand Cases to potential world production stacked by cost range for the 2013-2030 period. Chapter 8 Production Costs by Region shows production costs for Africa, Australia, North America, and 2015 UxC 7

Introduction and Overview Uranium Production Cost Study - Aug 2015 the Former Soviet Union and Asia. New to the study this year is a competitive cost comparison of 2014 production by countries/regions. Chapter 9 Production Costs by Mine Method illustrates potential production from all three mining methods in the 2013-2030 period, providing costs curves and production by cost for each method. Chapter 10 A Slow Move Back to Normal Queuing details how the market is slowly moving back to being production-driven, but still faces the challenge of high utility inventory levels and demand growth hindered by the slow return of Japanese reactors. Accordingly, low- and mid-cost producers are forced to survive until enough inventories are depleted and/or until enough higher-cost supply is eliminated while prices stay artificially low. Chapter 11 Financial Implications on Prices analyzes how financial implications not only affect uranium production costs directly, but also indirectly impact the sales price of uranium through variations in country exchange rates. Furthermore, inflation impacts uranium price formation, as increasing cost pressures on uranium prices then result in similar upward price pressure on the factor inputs for uranium production. Chapter 12 Matching Production Costs to Prices analyzes why prices are currently lower than our marginal-cost pricing picture, with a broad discussion of floor prices, term contract prices, and spot prices. Lastly, Chapter 13 Issues Affecting Next Generation of Projects identifies key issues mostly likely to affect the development of new uranium projects over the next 20-30 years. 8 2015 UxC