Parapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure.

Similar documents
JULY 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 11-1

Designer Supplement: AS-2-15 Approach Slab Installation January 16, 2015

Table of Contents. July

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION UNDERPASS GRADE SEPARATION DESIGN CRITERIA

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

PENNDOT e-notification

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

Figure: Grid or Waffle slab

NOVEMBER 2017 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 14-1

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

Structural Option April 7 th, 2010

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

Alberta Bridge Inventory STANDARD BRIDGE & CULVERT COMPONENTS. Standard Bridges. Typical Bridge Components. In Alberta there are about 13,300 bridges.

CHAPTER 9 STAIR CASES 9.1 GENERAL FEATURES 9.2 TYPES OF STAIR CASES

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

Introduction to Decks and Deck Systems

DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF T-WALL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Inventory Inspection and Load Rating of a Complex Segmental Concrete Bridge. Presented by Matthew J. Lengyel, PE, SE

16. Design of Pipeline Structures.

The use of 0.5 and 0.6 in. (13 and 15 mm) diameter

AUGUST 2016 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 3-1

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

Bridge articulation No. 1.04

PRESTRESSED AND POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 12

Session 2: Basic Load Rating Calculations

Lecture Retaining Wall Week 12

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

Design of Short Span Steel Bridges

STANDARD BWL-1: NOTES TO DESIGNER

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

Design of Rigid Pavements

CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CRIBLOCK CONCRETE CRIBWALL

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDES. Engineering Manual Preamble

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

LPI 56 Technical Guide

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

Chapter 3: Designing Steel Bridges Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E. July 2006

BRADD Software Executive Summary

Chapter 13: Retaining Walls

SJI Code of Standard Practice

SECTION 26 - COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECT DESIGN METHOD DDM

Substructure systems, specifically retaining walls

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC.

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

Open-Web Trusses. Including Red-L, Red-W, Red-S, Red-M and Red-H Trusses. Design Flexibility. Outstanding Strength-to-Weight Performance

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

STEEL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 11

2013 VIRGINIA CONCRETE CONFERENCE LESSONS LEARNED / CHALLENGES NOVA MEGAPROJECTS PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE FIELD PERSPECTIVE. Fawaz K. Saraf, P.E.

How to Design a Singly Reinforced Concrete Beam

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

Guide to Bridge Standard Drawings. August 2017 Bridge Division

Figure 1 Shear wall segments with mono-sloped top plates

TRANSVERSE SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 9

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NORMAL AND SKEW BRIDGE OF PSC BOX GIRDER

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Allowable Loads for Round Timber Poles

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

Structural Design of Pergola with Airfoil Louvers

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Including RedForm LVL, RedForm-I65, I90 and I90H Joists. Lightweight for Fast Installation. Compatible with Standard Framing

CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE

EN REINFORCED MASONRY DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 (NOTE: THIS USES THE UK NATIONAL ANNEX NDP VALUES)

BRIDGE GIRDERS TECHNICAL GUIDE

Design Data 6. Loads and Supporting Strengths Elliptical and Arch Pipe. Values of B d

Types of Foundations

Example. Monday, October 19, 2015

Current Standard Plates including Transmittal Letters are available on the web at:

Continuous for Live Load: A Texas Historical Perspective

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

Special Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Nasser Marafi. Alternate Floor Systems. Pro Con Structural Study of. Technical Report 2. Center & Facility Service Building

Title Page: Modeling & Load Rating of Two Bridges Designed with AASHTO and Florida I-Beam Girders

APPENDIX A - SIZING OF BRIDGE AND SUPPORT SYSTEM

Release Notes MERLIN DASH V10.8 (WIN 6.2)

ODOT Design & Construction Requirements for MSE Walls

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

Ironton Russell Bridge Project

Structural Inspection

ITEM D-701 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS

CONCRETE SPLICED GIRDERS IN TEXAS. Nicholas Nemec, P.E. TxDOT-BRG

MIDAS Training Series

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

LVL Product Guide 2.0E LVL 1.5E LVL

DESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB. January 14, 2017 Rev -

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Transcription:

GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of deck slab extensions at abutments. For general requirements and guidelines see File Nos. 20.01-1 thru -5. The details shown in this section are intended only to provide the designer with the necessary detailing practices and requirements for the detailing of deck slab extensions. Concrete deck slab main and distribution reinforcement shall be detailed and placed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 10 except where otherwise noted in this section. Deck slab extensions shall be designed to resist the loads and forces to which the bridge deck system may be subjected. ES series bars shown in the details contained in this section shall be of the size and spacing required when combined with the deck slab distribution reinforcement (SL series bars), the deck slab extension will have sufficient strength to resist these loads and forces. Deflection of deck slab extension plus live load deflection of bearing assembly shall be limited to no more than one-half the thickness of the expanded rubber joint filler on top of backwall in order to prevent any upward forces being transmitted into the deck slab extension. Sample design calculations are included in File Nos. 20.04-5 thru 20.04-18 of this section to assist the designer in the design of deck slab extensions. Parapet/railing terminal walls shall be located on the superstructure. The end of slab shall be used as a reference line for the Beginning of bridge and End of bridge shown on the developed section along the centerline or baseline on the title sheet. End of slab shall be labeled on the deck slab plan. The back of backwall/stem shall be used as a construction/layout reference line on the plan view shown on the substructure layout, curved bridge layout, erection diagram the abutment details. Deck slab extension details shall be shown with the Deck Slab Plan, Deck Slab Elevations and Deck Slab Placement Schedule in the bridge plan assembly. Deck slab extension details shall be shown using phantom lines with abutment sections. For location of deck slab extension details in the bridge plan assembly, see File No. 01.02-4. The design and detailing of abutments for use with deck slab extensions is similar to that for abutments. For design and detailing of abutments, see Chapter 17. Wingwall haunches shall be designed to resist the moment and shear transferred through the rub plates. For details of abutment drains, see Chapter 22. On projects where the deck extension is utilized and an approach slab is required, then a buried approach slab shall be used. For details of buried approach slabs, see Chapter 19. Details of drainage details specific to using a buried approach slab with deck slab extension are included in this section. SHEET 1 of 31 GENERAL INFORMATION FILE NO. 20.04-1

GENERAL INFORMATION (Continued): The minimum depth of deck slab extension for steel beam/girder superstructures shall be 12. Deck slab extension shall bear uniformly on the top of end diaphragm for design strength. On structure widths up to approximately 48', the designer shall connect the outside depths by a straight line, provided the maximum depth is not exceeded. Examples of deck extension on steel are shown on sheet 20.04-03. For structure widths greater than 48', the designer shall slope the backwalls parallel to top of deck maintaining the minimum depth. Designer has some flexibility in determining whether to design straight lined or to design parallel to cross slope. Other considerations in this determination would be the elevations at the outside edges of deck slab. Certain gradients and skews could increase or decrease these numbers and should be checked. The depth and size of diaphragms are additional factors in design. Straight line design provides for easier construction. Less abutment elevations calculations are needed for design. Parallel to cross slope provides for a more uniform design. Lower transverse forces are at the acute haunches. Smaller rub plates and smaller load applied to wing haunch may be additional considerations. The depth of deck slab extension shall not exceed 1-8. Bottom of deck slab extension and top of abutment backwall shall be sloped parallel to finished grade of deck slab while maintaining the minimum depth of 12. See transverse sections on sheet 20.04-4. The deck slab extends pass the back of backwall by four (4) inches. This dimension is affected by the thermal movement of the superstructure. The four (4) inches shall be set so that at 60 F it is at the midpoint of its movement. For design/detailing check list for deck slab extensions, see File No. 20.04-22. SHEET 2 of 31 GENERAL INFORMATION FILE NO. 20.04-2

Section on top of diaphragm near outside member. Section shown at interior with straight line when deck slab depth less than diaphragm depth. Section shown at maximum thickness with straight line with slab depth less than diaphragm depth.. SHEET 3 of 31 GENERAL INFORMATION FILE NO. 20.04-3

CROWNED DECK SLAB For use up to approximately 48 width CROWNED DECK SLAB For use when straight-line exceeds 1-8 depth SUPERELEVATED DECK SLAB TRANSVERSE SECTIONS SHEET 4 of 31 GENERAL INFORMATION FILE NO. 20.04-4

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS: Given: W Bridge = 43.333 ft Bridge width out-to-out W = 40.000 ft Bridge width curb-to-curb clear L = 250 ft Total bridge length (2 span continuous steel plate girder) bridge L = 125 Span length at the abutment to be designed Span L = 125 ft Thermal movement length at the abutment to be designed thermal S = 9.333 ft Spacing of beams/girders (not along skew) beam Overhang = 3.000 ft N b = 5 CS = 0.0208 θ = 30 Overhang Number of beams/girders Cross slope Skew angle Soil, concrete, and steel properties: γ soil = 145 pcf K P = 12 Unit weight of soil (use 145 for structural backfill) Passive earth pressure coefficient w = 150 pcf Unit weight of concrete Conc SHEET 5 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-5

f = 4,000 psi Compressive strength of superstructure concrete csuper f = 3,000 psi Compressive strength of substructure concrete csub E = 33(w c E csuper conc ) 1.5 ' c f = 3,834,000 psi Modulus of elasticity of concrete in superstructure E = 3,321,000 psi Modulus of elasticity of concrete in substructure csub E s = 29,000,000 psi f y = 60,000 psi Modulus of elasticity of steel Minimum yield strength of reinforcing steel n = 8 Modular ratio of superstructure super n = 9 Modular ratio of substructure sub F = 2,000 psi g Maximum galling stress for ASTM A276 Type 316 steel, of which the rub plates are constructed. Δ = 60 Temperature range for expansion texp Δ = 60 Temperature range for contraction tcont Δ = 120 t Total temperature range for expansion/contraction α = 6.5x10-6 per º F Coefficient of linear expansion for steel Determine depth of deck extension: Slab thickness = 8.5 in. Bolster thickness over support = 1.5 in. Top flange thickness at support = 0.75 in. Distance from bottom of top flange to top of end diaphragm = 3.0 in. Depth top of slab to top of end diaphragm/channel at exterior girder = 8.5 in + 1.5 in + 0.75 in + 3.0 = 13.75 in. Cross-slope times overhang = 3.0 ft (¼ in. per foot) = 0.75 in. Exterior edge of deck slab thickness = 13.75 in. 0.75 in. = 13.0 in. Determine whether to design parallel to cross-slope or straight-line from exterior to exterior edge of deck slab. Cross-slope times distance from centerline to exterior deck = 21.67 ft (¼ in. per foot) = 5.42 in. Add to exterior edge of deck slab to get centerline depth = 13.0 in + 5.42 in = 18.42 in. SHEET 6 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-6

Summary For the example problem, assume that no additional considerations affect the design. The minimum and maximum depth requirements for deck slab extension with crown deck utilizing straight-line from exterior to exterior are met. Exterior depth of deck = 13.0 > 12.0 OK Depth of deck at exterior diaphragm = 13.75 Centerline depth of deck = 18.42 < 20.0 OK > 12.0 OK If design is parallel to cross-slope, the design depth is to top of diaphragm. Design depth would be 13.75. If straight-line method is utilized, the design depth is limited to the exterior depth of deck due to the cross-slope of the deck. For ease of fabrication, use straight-line method with a design depth of 13.0 Cover = 3.5 Distance to centerline of reinforcement d = 13.0 3.0 = 9.50 in. TRANSVERSE SECTION SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-7 SHEET 7 of 31

Determine cantilever arm for moment and deflection design: SLAB END DETAIL Overhang = 4.0 in Backwall thickness = 12.0 in To CL bearing = 12.0 in Total = 4.0 + 12.0 + 12.0 = 28.0 in = 2.33 ft Lever arm = 28/cos θ = 28/cos 30 = 32.33 in = 2.69 ft Determine area of reinforcement required: Moment and shear due to dead load weight of the deck slab extension: h avg = (13.0+18.42) (½) = 15.71 in = 1.31 ft W DL = 150 lbs/ft 3 (1.31 ft) = 196 lbs per square foot of slab lbs 2 196 ( 2.69 ft) w L 2 2 M ft DL = = = 713.0 ft-lbs per foot of slab 2 2 lbs V DL = w x L = 196 (2.69 ft) = 529.0 lbs per foot of slab ft 2 SHEET 8 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-8

Moment and shear due to wheel load on deck slab extension: For computing bending moment in foot pounds per foot for longitudinally reinforced slabs shall by: M w = P (S) E (ft-lbs per foot of slab) where P = 16,000 lbs (wheel load for HS20 loading) Conservatively, E is set to equal 4.0 feet. S = distance in feet from load to point of support (face of diaphragm) = 2.33ft / cos 30 = 2.69 ft ( ) = P S 16,000 lbs 2.69 ft M w = = 10,776 ft-lbs per foot of slab E 4.0 Assume live load impact fraction equal to 30% M w+i V w+i = 1.30(10,776 ft-lbs) = 14,010 ft-lbs per foot of slab = 1.30(16,000 lbs)/4.0 ft = 5,200 lbs per foot of slab Moment due to passive earth pressure: 1 2 1 lbs 145 2 3 ft ( 12)( 1.309 ft) 2 q p = γ s Kp h = = 1,492 lbs per foot of slab 2 e = 15.71 in 2 15.71 in 3 = 2.62 in. ( 2.62 in) 1,492 lbs M p = q p e = = 326 ft-lbs per foot of slab in 12 ft SHEET 9 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-9

The moment due to passive pressure induces additional deflection which can be converted to an effective P load, P. pvertical P pvertical = Mp/Lever Arm = 326 ft-lbs/2.69 ft = 121 lbs per foot of slab Total moment capacity required of the deck slab extension: M total = M DL + M w+i + M p = 713 ft-lbs + 14,010 ft-lbs + 326 ft-lbs = 15,049 ft-lbs per foot of slab P Total = P DL + P w + P PVeritcal = 529 lbs + 5,200 lbs + 121 lbs = = 5,850 lbs per foot of slab Area of additional reinforcement required: A s (provided by top distribution steel) = 0.19 in 2 per foot of slab A s (provided by bottom distribution steel) = 0.19 in 2 per foot of slab Using the Bridge Concrete Section Analysis Program (trial and error) or alternative method, the total area of top reinforcement required, A (total required) = 0.88 in 2 per foot of slab. s 2 A s (additional required) = 0.88 in (total required) 0.19 in 2 (provided) 2 = 0.69 in per foot of slab 2 provided = 0.70 in per foot of slab). Therefore use #6 bars (ES series) @ 7.5 o/c max. (A s Maximum reinforcement size is limited to #6 bar size. Spacing shall not be less than four (4) inches. Check deflection of section: Δ Load 3 PTotal L = 3 Ec I where P Total = P DL + P w + P PVeritcal = 5,850 lbs L = 32.332 in (overhang length) E c = 3,834,000 psi I = moment of inertia SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-10 SHEET 10 of 31

For computing the moment of inertia for use in computation of deflections, Article 8.13.3 of the AASHTO specifications gives the following equation: Ie 3 3 M cr M I 1 cr = g + I cr I AASHTO Eq. 8-1 M M g a a f 7.5 f ' r = c = 7.5 4,000 psi = 474 psi ( 13.0 in) 3 3 b h 12 in I g = = = 2,197 in 4 12 12 f 474 psi 2,197 in 4 r Ig in M cr = = / 12 = 13,361 ft-lbs yt 6.875 in ft M a = M w = 15,049 ft-lbs I cr = moment of inertia of cracked section transformed to concrete = 407 in 4 (Bridge Concrete Section Analysis Program) or alternative method. 3 3 13,361 ft - lbs 4 13,361 ft - lbs + 4 I e = 2,197 in 1 = 474 in 1,669 in 4 15,049 ft - lbs 15,049 ft - lbs I e < I g = 2,197 in 4 Therefore, I = 1,660 in 4 Δ Load = 0.0104 in in 5,850 lbs 2.694 ft x 12 ft = 3 3,834,000 psi 4 ( )( 1,660 in ) 3 Conservatively, the cracked moment of inertia, 407 in 4 could be used in the above equation. The resulting deflection is 0.042 in. Deflection in bearing: The deflection of the bearing is also affected by the deflection of the live load applied. The compressive deflection and long term creep deflection shall be considered. The deflection of the cantilever is limited to one-half the thickness of the expanded rubber joint filler to prevent any significant upward forces to the deck extension. If the there is more than 0.25 inch deflection than the expanded rubber joint filler may be increase to 3 / 4 thickness. Steel = 0.0 inches Laminated bearings = Live load deflection in bearings SHEET 11 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-11

Assume steel bearing for this design: Δ bearing = 0.0 Δ Total = 0.0104 + 0.00 = 0.0104 in < 1 / 2 thickness of expanded rubber joint filler OK Distribution reinforcement for deck slab extension, main reinforcement parallel to loading. AASHTO 3.24.10.2 100 Percentage = Maximum = 50% S Eq. 3-21 Percentage = 100 = 61% 2.694 > 50% Use 50%. 2 Transverse distribution reinforcing steel in deck extension required is 0.50 (0.845 in ) = 0.42 in 2. Deck has SB/SC05 series at 5.5 inches on center thus area of steel is 0.68 in 2 which is greater than the 0.4225 in 2 needed. No additional steel needed for distribution. Use ET04 in the bottom of deck slab extension. Passive Pressure, Force, and Buttress Force Compute reaction, R p, required to resist the passive soil pressure. See the lateral force derivations for semi-integrals File No. 20.07-4. Referring to the derivation of lateral force equations, the following equation needs to be solved. R p = q W tan θ ) W 1 + ( tan θ ) L q = 1,491 plf Resultant of passive force at a point along the backwall W = 43.33 ft Bridge width out-to-out Bridge θ = 30 Skew angle L = 250 ft Total bridge length (2 span continuous steel plate girder) Bridge SHEET 12 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-12

R p = 1,491plf(43.333ft)tan(30) 43.333 1+ tan(30) 250 = 33,904 lbs The rub plates and wing haunch on the acute corners need to be designed to resist 33,904 lbs. If abutments are not identical, the loading could be different for each abutment. Required Rub Plate Size: Assume allowable galling stress, f g = 0.55F g, = 0.55(2,000 psi) = 1,100 psi Minimum plate size is 8 in x 6 in. x ½ in thick. Maximum height of plate, H max = slab exterior thickness 3 in = 13.0 in 3.0 in = 10.0 in Try 8 x 6 plate first. Rp W min = = h(fg ) 33,904 lbs 6 in ( 1,100 psi) = 5.14 in Thermal movement (expansion/contraction): Thermal movement length shall be based on the two-thirds the total movement for 120 degrees temperature range. Rub plate size shall be sized for this movement length. 2 in Δ L = α Δt L = 0.0000065 per F ( 120 F) 125 ft 12 = 0.78 in thermal 3 ft W required = W min + Δ L = 5.14 in + 0.78 in = 5.92 in. Therefore, use 8 in, the minimum. See File No. 20.04-27 for rub plate guidelines. SHEET 13 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-13

Center the rub plates on edge of deck extension and wing haunch. Opposite corner takes all the expansion and the joint width may need to be increased to satisfy the transverse expansion of the superstructure. SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-14 SHEET 14 of 31

Design of wing haunch: Extend wing haunch perpendicular to edge of deck slab sufficiently to handle R P equal to 33,904 lbs. Width of haunch design is 13.88 inches, Thus b = 13.88 in. Determine allowable shear stress carried by concrete in the wing haunch. ' v c = 0.95 fc = 0.95 3,000 psi = 52.0 psi Determine required d for concrete only to carry the applied load with 125% overstress allowed for Group IV loading. R v = P bd(1.25) Solving for d d = Rp bv (1.25) c 33,904lbs = = 37.59 in. 13.88 in(52 psi)(1.25) Haunch depth required without stirrups, h, would be 37.59 in. + 3.0 in = 40.59 in. Section can be reduced with the use of stirrups to minimize the space required and the amount of concrete needed. SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-15 SHEET 15 of 31

Try a depth of haunch of 24.0 inches. This yields an approximate d = 24.0 in. 3.0 in. = 21.0 in. Additional d value could be used if the sloped portion of the wing is considered in providing additional resistance in the case of elephant ear wings. However, it shall be ignored in this example. v = R P bd(1.25) = 33,904 lbs 13.875 in( 21 in)1.25 = 93.1 psi v = v C+ vs Solving for v S v S = 93.1 52 = 41.1 psi Therefore, stirrups required. Shear reinforcement required by AASHTO 8.15.5.3.2 is given by v sbs A V = AASHTO Eq. (8-7) fs A f Solving for s = v s v sb. Try #4 stirrups, A V = 0.4 sq. in. s = (0.4 in )(24,000psi) 41.1psi(13.875 in) = 16.83 inches per AASHTO Eq. (8-7) and #4 reinforcing steel. AASHTO 8.15.5.3.8 requires that when v - v C exceeds Article 8.19 shall be reduced by one-half. 2 ' f c the maximum spacing given in ' v - v C = 41.1 psi < 2 f c = 109.5 psi AASHTO 8.15.5.3.8 does not apply. Minimum shear reinforcement required by AASHTO 8.19.3 is given by 50b ws A V = fy AASHTO Eq. (8-64) SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-16 SHEET 16 of 31

Solving for s = A v f 50b y w s min = (0.4 sq. in.)(60,000psi) = 34.59 inches 50(13.875in.) AASHTO 8.19.1 (minimum). s max = 24.0 inches AASHTO 8.19.3. s max = 21.0/2 = d/2 = 10.5 inches AASHTO 8.19.3. Therefore, use #4 reinforcing stirrups at 10½ inches in wing haunch as a minimum. Determine moment in wing haunch. h = 13.00 inches Lever arm, y = 0.5 + h/2 = 0.5+13.0/2 = 7.0 inches Group IV loading allows for 125% overstress. Reduce load, R P by 1.25 R P = 33,904 lbs. /1.25 = 27,200 lbs (rounded up to nearest 100). MHaunch = y R p = 189,865 in-lb = 15,822 ft-lb Area of additional reinforcement required: Using the Bridge Concrete Section Analysis Program (trial and error) or alternative method, the total area of reinforcement required, A s (total required) = 0.40 in 2 for the wing haunch. SHEET 17 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-17

Check minimum reinforcement per AASHTO 8.17 2 2 h fc 24 3,000 min ρ s = 1.7 = 1.7 = 0.002027 d fy 21 60,000 A sc = ρ s (bd) = 0.002027(13.88 )(21 ) = 0.59 in 2. Try 3 - #4 A s < A sc, then check 4 / 3 A s = 0.53 in 2 < A sc, then use 4 / 3 A s. 2 A s provided = 0.60 in > 0.59 in 2 OK Locate the reinforcing steel at an effective d of 21.0 inches from the applied point of load. Note: The above sample design calculations is for a two span continuous steel plate girder bridge. Design procedure is similar for a prestressed concrete beam bridge. SHEET 18 of 31 SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATIONS FILE NO. 20.04-18

CHECK LIST FOR 1 Wing haunch at acute corner shall be designed to resist the moment and shear induced by the force resulting from the passive earth pressure and the skew. Rub plates are only required at the acute corners of skewed bridges. Rub plates to be centered vertically and horizontally over contact area. 2 Minimum thickness of the preformed joint filler between the backwall and the wing at the obtuse corner shall be 1. This may be increased due to thermal expansion in the transverse direction. 3 Extend wing 6 above finished grade. Not required for bridges without skew or where terminal wall is on the substructure. 4 Top of rub plate to begin 1 1 / 2 below top of deck. Bottom of rub plate to maintain 1 1 / 2 clear from bottom of deck extension. Preformed joint filler to extend as shown. 5 Delete this note if railings are used or slip forming of parapets is not allowed. 6 Show plan and elevation view of deck slab extensions at a preferred scale of 3 / 8 = 1-0. The elevation view should be projected down from the plan view. When bridge is not on skew and where sufficient room is available in elevation view, plan view is not required. 7 Label the location centerline/baseline as shown on the title sheet. 8 End of slab shall be used as the reference line for layout of deck slab extensions. 9 Label skew angle (if applicable). 10 The minimum width of backwall shall be 1-0 for bridges without approach slabs and 1-7 for bridges with approach slabs. If approach slabs are a future possibility, the minimum width of backwall shall be 1-7. 11 The approach slab seat (7 ) shall be provided on all deck slab extensions where future possibility may require the addition of an approach slab. 12 Show sections taken through the deck slab extension at a preferred scale of 3 / 4 = 1-0. Coordinate the sections to provide the necessary details with repetition only where required. 13 Maximum spacing is 12. 14 For instructions on completing the title block, see File No. 03.03. 15 For instructions on completing the project block, see File No. 03.02. 16 For instructions on developing the CADD sheet number, see File Nos. 01.01-7 and 01.14-4. 17 For general sheet order, see File No. 01.02-4. - SLAB END DETAILS SHEET 22 of 31 CHECK LIST FILE NO. 20.04-22

SLAB END DETAIL The above detail shall be used where a deck extension on steel members is deemed appropriate. 1. Section is taken normal to the abutment face. Section is for slab details and shall be shown on the deck slab details sheets. Substructure details shall be shown on the abutment sheets. 2. The ½ expanded rubber joint filler shall extend the full length of the deck slab extension. 3. This dimension shall be determined by the designer and shown on the plans. 4. Provide dimension as necessary to maintain a 4 minimum overhang throughout the full range of thermal movement. INTEGRAL /JOINTLESS BRIDGES DATE: 11May2007 - SLAB END DETAIL SHEET 23 of 31 STEEL MEMBERS - NO APPROACH SLAB FILE NO. 20.04-23

SLAB END DETAIL The above detail shall be used where a deck extension on prestressed concrete members is deemed appropriate. 1. Section is taken normal to the abutment face. Section is for slab details and shall be shown on the deck slab details sheets. Substructure details shall be shown on the abutment sheets. 2. The ½ expanded rubber joint filler shall extend the full length of the deck slab extension. 3. This dimension shall be determined by the designer and shown on the plans. 4. Provide dimension as necessary to maintain a 4 minimum overhang throughout the full range of thermal movement. INTEGRAL /JOINTLESS BRIDGES DATE: 11May2007 - SLAB END DETAIL SHEET 24 of 31 PRESTRESSED MEMBERS - NO APPROACH SLAB FILE NO. 20.04-24

SLAB END DETAIL The above detail shall be used where an approach slab and deck extension on steel members are deemed appropriate. For details for drainage system, see sheet 20.04-29. 1. Section is taken normal to the abutment face. Section is for slab details and shall be shown on the deck slab details sheets. Substructure details shall be shown on the abutment sheets. 2. The ½ expanded rubber joint filler shall extend the full length of the deck slab extension. 3. This dimension shall be determined by the designer and shown on the plans. 4. Provide dimension as necessary to maintain a 4 minimum overhang throughout the full range of thermal movement. DATE: 11May2007 - SLAB END DETAIL SHEET 25 of 31 STEEL MEMBERS WITH APPROACH SLAB FILE NO. 20.04-25

SLAB END DETAIL The above detail shall be used where an approach slab and deck extension on prestressed concrete members are deemed appropriate. For details for drainage system, see sheet 20.04-29. 1. Section is taken normal to the abutment face. Section is for slab details and shall be shown on the deck slab details sheets. Substructure details shall be shown on the abutment sheets. 2. The ½ expanded rubber joint filler shall extend for the full length of the deck slab extension. 3. This dimension shall be determined by the designer and shown on the plans. 4. Provide dimension as necessary to maintain a 4 minimum overhang throughout the full range of thermal movement. DATE: 11May2007 - SLAB END DETAIL SHEET 26 of 31 PRESTRESSED WITH APPROACH SLAB FILE NO. 20.04-26

RUB PLATE DETAIL 4 plates required - 2 at each acute corner Bridges on skews shall be provided with rub plates on the deck slab extensions. Rub plates are not required for bridges with skew = 0. The stainless steel plate shown above shall conform to the requirements of ASTM 276, Type 316. Rub plates shall be designed to resist horizontal forces due to thermal induce passive earth pressures and to accommodate the travel due to thermal movements. For sample design calculations, see File Nos. 20.04-5 and -18. Minimum size of rub plates shall be 8 (W) x 6 (H) x 1 / 2. H max = depth of deck slab extension 3 (1 1 / 2 concrete cover top and bottom of plate). Spacing of shear studs shall not exceed 6. Rub plates shall be centered vertically on the depth of the deck slab extension and horizontally on the contact area of the deck slab extension and the wingwall haunch. Add appropriate note on the plan sheet for estimated quantities for cost of rub plates. For steel beams/girders, include cost in structural steel. For concrete beams, include cost in abutment concrete (Class A3). DATE: 11May2007 SHEET 27 of 31 RUB PLATE FILE NO. 20.04-27

Terminal wall for deck extension shall be extended beyond the end of slab as shown above. For example partial details of terminal wall. See File No. 20.04-29. For details of drainage, see File No. 20.04-30 and -31. Note to designer: Terminal walls for parapet/railings shall extend 2'-3" beyond the end of slab extension and shall be deepened to the depth of the deck slab extension as shown. The deepened section assists in limiting the amount of erosion at the end of the deck slab. Remaining details shall be as shown on the parapet/railing system utilized. DATE: 11May2007 SHEET 28 of 31 TERMINAL WALL FILE NO. 20.04-28

ELEVATION VIEW PART PLAN TYPICAL FOR SKEWED CROSSING PART PLAN TYPICAL FOR STRAIGHT CROSSING DATE: 11May2007 SHEET 29 of 31 TERMINAL WALL FILE NO. 20.04-29

Note to Designer: TERMINAL WALL, BURIED APPROACH SLAB, AND PIPE UNDERDRAIN RELATIONSHIP DETAIL 1. Dimension shall be three feet beyond edge of pavement as a minimum. The approach slab shall be kept one foot from face of rail. PIPE UNDERDRAIN END DETAIL SHEET 30 of 31 ABUTMENT DRAIN DETAILS FILE NO. 20.04-30

PIPE UNDERDRAIN NOTES TO BE PLACED ON PLANS (To be used only when buried approach slab is used) Pipe underdrain shall conform to the requirements of Section 232. The pipe underdrain shall follow the cross slope of the roadway over the approach slab. The pipe underdrain shall extend to 12" past the edge of the side slope and be located to provide free drainage away from the structure. The slope towards the side slopes shall be no less than two percent (2%). Porous backfill shall be placed around the pipe underdrain as detailed and as directed by the Engineer. The porous backfill shall extend 12 inches off the end of the deck extension over the buried approach slab and then 18" off the end of deck extension to the outside edge of wings. The porous backfill shall be paid for as Porous Backfill when it is a bid item and when porous backfill is not a bid item it shall be included in the bid price for the buried approach slab. The bid price shall be full compensation for all labor, tools, materials, equipment, and incidentals required for the satisfactory completion of the work. When a bid item, pipe underdrain will be measured in linear feet, complete-in-place and will be paid for at the contract unit price per linear feet. When not a bid item, pipe underdrain shall be included in the bid price for the buried approach slab. SHEET 31 of 31 ABUTMENT DRAIN DETAILS FILE NO. 20.04-31