PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

Similar documents
FERTILIZATION OF FORAGES. Wheatland County May 19, Clain Jones

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Urea Volatilization and Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers for Small Grains Crop Pest Management School January 6, 2011

Soil Nutrient Management: Testing, Sources, and Foliar Application Soils Workshops for Hill, Blaine and Phillips Counties Feb.

Central Region Ag Agent Update Choteau, April 4, 2017

Pulse Crop Inoculation and Fertilization January 13, 2017 Hill County Extension Pulse Workshop

Protecting Your Water and Air Resources

Nitrogen Management in Direct Seeding Operations

Timing of Foliar Applications

SOIL ACIDIFICATION. Chouteau County January 11, Clain Jones MSU Soil Fertility Extension

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

SOIL ACIDIFICATION. Clain Jones ) Rick Engel )

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Irrigated Pastures. Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide. Introduction. Nutrient Distribution and Cycling in Grazed Pastures

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Evaluation of ESN Fertilizer in Southcentral Montana

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Fertilizer Management of Forage Crops in the Canadian Great Plains

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

NITROGEN, SULFUR, POTASSIUM AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION IN ALFALFA WHEN ARE THEY NECESSARY? Richard T. Koenig 1 ABSTRACT

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

COVER CROPS AND SOIL HEALTH

Nutrient Management Conference Feb. 7, 2017, St. Cloud, MN Rick Gilbertson Pro Ag Crop Consultants, Inc.

Successful 4R Nutrient Stewardship Extension Techniques: Fertilizer Rate, Source and Placement

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

Fertilizing Small Grains in Arizona

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

EFFECTS OF COVER CROP TERMINATION TIMING, SPECIES, AND MIXTURES ON YIELD, PROTEIN, ECONOMIC RETURN AND SOIL QUALITY

Monitoring Soil Nutrients in Dryland Systems Using Management Units

ORGANIC VEGETABLE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cover Crop Research Results

Quantifying Ammonia Volatilization from Surface-Applied Fertilizers in Kentucky Bluegrass Grown for Seed, Marvin Butler and Rhonda Simmons

Number 209 September 11, 2009

GROWTH OF GRASSES & LEGUMES: IMPACT ON GRAZING

Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations

Nitrogen Fertilizer Technology Evaluations and Nitrogen. Richard Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey County

SF723 (Revised) Barley

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Taking a Closer Look at Your Soil Report

Taking a Closer Look at Your Soil Report

Reducing Livestock s Winter-Feed Costs. Mark Landefeld Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Monroe County

QUANTIFYING AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM SURFACE-APPLIED FERTILIZERS IN CENTRAL OREGON KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED PRODUCTION

Soil firmness is critical for successful stand establishment in smallseeded legumes and grasses primarily to provide _seed-soil water

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

Metcel VMF Herbicide EPA Reg. No FOR USE ON PASTURE AND RANGELAND

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

Nutrient Management (NM)

A Guide to Collecting Soil Samples for Farms and Gardens

LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE

Far West Idaho Conference Twin Falls 2015 V. Paul Hobson, Land View Inc.

Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in Wheat Production, Yuma

Calculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth

Cover Crop Multi Species Mixes for Lower Feed Cost & Soil Improvement Jerry Lindquist MSU Extension

Cool-season Grasses 1

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS CORN, SOYBEANS, WHEAT & ALFALFA FOR. Michigan State University The Ohio State University Purdue University

Fertility management in organic strawberries

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Do not oven-dry the soil

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

For nmental. of 10. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

Irrigated Spring Wheat

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

The Nitrogen Cycle options for interventions.

Farmer Considerations and Practices with Cover Crops

Alfalfa Planting and Production Management

Soil and Nutrient Management of. alfalfa. Ensuring adequate soil fertility levels and effectively. Soil sampling and testing: when, where and how

Sulphur Fertilizer Application in Crop Production

Nitrogen Management Products. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management. Lesson 3: Applying Fertilizers to Field Crops

LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

FERTILIZING WYOMING HAY MEADOWS: How Much Nitrogen Can You Afford?

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Time and Method of Fertilizer Application

Cover Cropping Strategies. To forget how to dig the earth and to tend the soil is to forget ourselves. - Gandhi

NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT OF TEMPORARILY FLOODED SOILS TO IMPROVE CORN PRODUCTION AND REDUCE ENVIROMENTAL N LOSS

Urea Formaldehydes and Triazones: What We Know Koch Agronomic Services, LLC

Watermelon Response to Soluble and Slow Release Nitrogen Fertilizers

History. Grass Seed Production. Uses. Uses. Oregon Grass Seed. Environment Requirements 2/7/2008

Split Application- North Dakota Perspective. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science Extension Soil Specialist, NDSU, Fargo

Does Organic Matter Really Matter? Jodi DeJong-Hughes Regional Extension Educator, Willmar x 2006

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

Wasted. fertilizer. is wasted. money. Make the most of your fertilizer investment with AVAIL and NutriSphere-N

KEEPING livestock well fed during the

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops. Tom Obreza and Jerry Sartain Soil and Water Science Dept.

Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

Transcription:

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT Sanders County April 8, 2015 Clain Jones clainj@montana.edu 994-6076

Some questions for you Who raises grass hay? Who raises alfalfa hay? Who has pasture? Who grows annual forages (ex: Haybet barley, Willow Creek winter wheat)? Ok, now that we ve all gotten the blood flowing.

Goals To review use of Fertilizer Guidelines to determine N, P and K rates on forages To present timing, source and placement considerations of N and P fertilization To illustrate yield and quality responses of hay to N fertilizer To provide an update on new fertilizer products that could benefit forage producers To provide economic considerations for fertilizing

Focus of N or P and K depends on % legume in stand Yield increases and net returns greatest if < 36% alfalfa in stand and soil N < 5 lb N/acre (Malhi et al. 2004)

Fertilizing with nutrients other than N favors legumes over grass Wisconsin, Schneider 2009

N rate depends on legume to grass ratio N fertilizer guidelines for alfalfa and grass in MT (Table 1 in EB0161) Yield Potential (ton/acre) Alfalfa/Grass 80/20 64/40 40/60 20/80 0/100 Available N (lb/acre) 1 5 10 15 20 25 2 10 20 30 40 50 3 15 30 45 60 75 4 20 40 60 80 100 * 5 25 50 75 100 * 125 * 6 30 60 90 120 * 150 * * Do not exceed 100 lb/ac in a single application on cool season grasses (Brummer et al. 2011). Need to divide by fraction of N in fertilizer to find total fertilizer need

Example soil test report from Trout Creek, MT To determine N rate you need: 1. Yield goal 2. Soil sample depth to convert ppm to lb N/acre (ppm x 2 x actual depth in inches / 6)

Adding N having alfalfa in mix may be best source of N Malhi et al. 2002, Eckville, Alberta 17.5 avg annual and 10.5 May-Aug precip

Single N application to dryland grass pasture near Havre, MT (Lorbeer et al. 1994) 0, 50 and 100 lb N/acre fall broadcast once harvested for 6 years dryland grasses Natv Bnch: Basin wildrye, Beardless whtgrs, Green needlegrass, Slender whtgrass Natv Rhizom: Thickspike whtgrass, Western whtgrass Intro Bnch: Crested whtgrass, Russian wildrye, Tall whtgrass Intro Rhizom: Pubescent whtgrass, Intermed whtgrass (2)

Average Annual Yield over 6 Years (tons/acre) Single N application increases dryland grass yields 1.0 0.8 Lorbeer et al. 1994 Havre, dryland grasses single fall broadcast N lb/acre 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100 Natv bnch Natv rhizm Intro bnch Intro rhizm

N for hay quality Higher yields may mean lower quality In dryland or mountain meadows 40-80 lb N/acre to increase yield and maintain quality (Brummer and Rill 1999, Brummer pers. comm.) Too much N may be lost to ground water or cause nitrate toxicity in forage

Trade-off between yield and forage nitrate Bromegrass, Vimy, Alberta Penny et al. 1990 and MT200505AG

Placement Granular: On established forage, surface broadcast is essentially only option. Others? Liquid (UAN; 32-0-0 or 28-0-0): Surface broadcast including fertigation, surface band, or knifed. Method Broadcast Knife Surface Band Forage Yield 2.9 t/ac 2.8 t/ac 3.4 t/ac N. Central Regional Extension Pub #326, KSU

Timing Yield and quality are affected by timing Because urea may take days to weeks to become available, urea should be applied earlier than AN historically was for fast green-up.

Provide N shortly after green-up Willamette Valley, Oregon Hart et al. 1989

Split app may increase total yield, improves distribution over season Early spring alone, or split between early spring and after the 1 st, or 1 st and 2 nd cutting

Incorporate immediately with water to increase N recovery 0.8 irrigation Eckville, Alberta Bromegrass, Malhi et al. 1995

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers (EEFs) and forage production Forage production lacks incorporation, and plant residue intercepts fertilizer, increases volatilization, and microbes can tie up N EEFs retain N on site by reducing loss to volatilization, leaching and N-gas Stabilize or inhibit soil processes to extend N availability (NSN ), reduce urea conversion to ammonia (Agrotain : urease inhibitor ~ 14 days) or ammonium to nitrate (DCD) Slow release of urea through a coating (polymer coated PCU such as ESN, sulfur coated - SCU) Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) isn t enhanced but is less explosive than ammonium nitrate

Effect of N source on volatilization losses Applied to grass sod, avg. air temp 50 F (Horneck and Holcomb)

Nitrogen EEF and forage production Environmentally responsible but more $ Conservation Stewardship Program incentive Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers (EB0188) http://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility

Questions?

Phosphorus (P) Why important to grass/alfalfa stands? Helps with N fixation in nodules Favors alfalfa over grass P improves alfalfa regrowth and recovery after cutting (IPNI)

Alfalfa response to P Alfalfa more likely to respond if soil levels low. PNW bulletin 611

Example soil test report from Trout Creek, MT MSU guidelines are based on Olsen P

P rates P guidelines for alfalfa and grass in MT based on soil analysis (Table 18 in EB0161 w/ alfalfa/grass revised). Olsen P Soil Test Level (ppm) Crop 0 4 8 12 16 P Fertilizer Rate (lb P 2 O 5 /acre) Alfalfa 140 110 75 40 20 Alfalfa/grass (50/50) 93 73 53 30 13 Grass 45 35 30 20 5 If soil test is above 16 ppm then use removal rate (10 to 11 lb P 2 O 5 /ton)

Potassium (K) Benefits Improved alfalfa stand persistence, shoots per plant and rhizobia activity Reduces leaf drop of alfalfa Improved resistance to plant diseases Needed in Montana? Useful on many soils, even some having high K values (especially in cool spring soils)

How might lack of K affect an alfalfa-hay field?

Base alfalfa K need on soil test rather than tissue test Koenig 2001 WNMC Too much K can lead to luxury consumption by first cutting and risk of milk fever. Apply ½ the rate after first cutting and rest after last cutting for following year

Example soil test report from Trout Creek, MT Compare to MSU guidelines

K rates K guidelines for alfalfa and grass in MT based on soil analysis (Table 19 in EB0161, alfalfa/grass rates revised). Crop K Soil Test Level (ppm) 0 50 100 150 200 250 K Fertilizer Rate (lb K 2 O/acre) Alfalfa 240 205 170 140 95 30 Alfalfa/grass (50/50) 192 165 137 112 76 26 Grass 80 70 60 45 30 15 If soil test is above 250 ppm then use removal rate 38 lb K 2 O/ton grass, 53 lb/ton alfalfa

Sulfur (S) Useful on sandy, acidic or low organic matter soils, especially after high rainfall (sulfate leaches) or in spring with cool soils Soil tests are not reliable Use visual symptoms and field history or tissue sampling. If < 0.22% S in top 6 inches of alfalfa (early bud stage) then should get a yield increase S. S > 0.30% can cause livestock health problem

S influence on forage quality N conversion to protein requires S Increased S can lead to increased protein, digestibility and reduced nitrate concentration 25 lb S/ac on dryland alfalfa and alfalfa/grass mix increased forage protein 0.8 points (Fertilizer Fact 27)

S influence on annual forage quality (western Montana) Westcott unpub. data

Provide S before start of jointing stage in grass Willamette Valley, Oregon Hart et al., 1989

Provide S early for alfalfa Union, Oregon Pumphrey and Moore 1965

Questions?

General timing considerations for forage fertilization If sub-irrigated, fertilize for high yield potential but apply P in fall Irrigated/wet meadows apply nutrients in spring Late fall/early spring timing for cool season mix (except on sandy soil),mid-may for warm season mix

Fertilization strategy If a field containing < 75% legumes will be rotated into a different crop soon, consider N for immediate gain If goal is low input, long-term sustainable production rather than prime quality hay, adequate P and K are key and cheaper than reor interseeding If you need to buy hay or rent pasture, you should consider fertilizing

N Fertilization Economics: dryland introduced sodforming grass Havre, MT, Jacobsen et al. 1996

P and K fertilization strategy Immobile nutrients can be banked know soil test levels and if low, build up P and K when prices low A single 100-400 lb P 2 O 5 /ac on dryland alfalfa produced similar yield, protein and profit as same amount divided over 5 annual applications (central Alberta, Malhi et al. 2001). =

N, P, K for new seedings Base N, P, K rates on soil tests If seeding on fallow, OM >3% provides adequate N for 2-3 years Do not exceed 60 lb N/acre in the first year If N is banded or seed placed do not exceed 10-15 lb N, P as 11-52-0, or (N + K 2 O)/acre to reduce risk to seedlings Build up soil P and K levels prior to seeding Safe rates of additional P and K seed placed can increase seedling establishment, MAP is safer than DAP

Summary Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur can all increase forage yields Economic benefits often aren t realized in the first year (so don t base advice on 1 yr studies!) Soil testing is essential for determining fertilizer needs Select the right rate, source, timing and placement

Pick up a copy or download these 2 Extension Bulletins

Questions? Photo by Ann Ronning Additional info at: http://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility