Task Enhanced Mobility of Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) Using Dissolved Humic Acids

Similar documents
Material Tested To-Date

PRODUCTION WELL WATER SHUT-OFF TREATMENT IN A HIGHLY FRACTURED SANDSTONE RESERVOIR

JUNE 14-16, 2016 SHERATON TYSONS CORNER TYSONS, VA. #CCUS

Dale R. Wahlquist. Submitted to the. American Glovebox Society 10th Annual Conference July 22-25, 1996 San Diego, California

Environmentally Conscious Closed-Loop Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Cleaning Systems for Defluxing and Degreasing

FAX: Title of Presentation: Criticality Measurements for SNM Accountability

This document was prepared in conjunction with work accomplished under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 with the U. S. Department of Energy.

ILLINOIS INDUSTRIAL CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE PROJECT

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

GASOLINE FROM NATURAL GAS BY SULFUR PROCESSING

TREATMENT OF PERCHLORATE AND 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN GROUNDWATER USING EDIBLE OIL SUBSTRATE (EOS )

MPPE Benefits. 1 Very High Separation Performance Reduction factor 1,000,000 times = % removal if required

Multiphase flow and enhanced biodégradation of dense non-aqueous phase liquids: experimental design

WRITECoal Gasification of Low- Rank Coals for Improved Advanced Clean Coal Gasifier / IGCC Design

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

MPPE Systems WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Determination of Compliance with Exposure Limits for Mixtures of Volatile Organic Compounds with a Field Portable GC/MS

Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Hub and Spoke Recycling

Humate-Induced Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Surface Soils - Annual Report

Conveyorized Photoresist Stripping Replacement for Flex Circuit Fabrication

Managing the Distributed Solar Fleet: From Interconnection to Fleet Operations

EFFECTIVE CLEANUP AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND APPROACHES

Overview of Alstom s Chemical Looping Programs

GE Global Research Rahul Bidkar Doug Hofer Andrew Mann Max Peter Rajkeshar Singh Edip Sevincer Azam Thatte

Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency

Plasma Process Control with Optical Emission. Spectroscopy. Pamela P. Ward Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico.

MONTHLY TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT. Product Design Improvement

Development of A Comprehensive Software Suite for Stability Monitoring and Analysis Based on Synchrophasor Measurement (DOE-OE )

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Bioremediation Product Series

ASTER. US.Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-960R22464 GELCASTING OF SILICON CARBIDE CERAMICS APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

TECHNICAL REPORT September 1 through November 30, DOE Cooperative Agreement Number: DE-FC22-92PC92521 (Year 3)

My Electric Footprint

Simulation-Based Optimization Framework with Heat Integration

-7f. Performance Test Results of Non i nvas ive Characterization of RCRA Surrogate Waste by Prompt Gamma Neutron Activation Analysis

Surfactant selection for enhanced contaminant extraction

USER S GUIDE. ESTCP Project ER Methods for Minimization and Management of Variability in Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Results

A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership

Overview on in-situ thermal remediation technologies

Reading Your Electric Meter

Spray DryedBaghouse System Testing CRADA , Final Report. April 28,1992. Henry W. Pennline. U.S.Department of Energy

Interpreting tracer data to forecast remedial performance

SMU Geothermal Conference March 13, 2013

STP-NU-035 EXTEND ALLOWABLE STRESS VALUES FOR ALLOY 800H

Comparison of purge and no-purge sampling strategies for deep groundwater

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

ENERGYPLUS TRAINING MODULES FOR BUILDING PHYSICS: DAYLIGHTING, INFILTRATION, INSULATION, INTERNAL GAINS, AND THERMAL MASS

Manufactured Gas Plant Site Management - Program 50

World Class CO 2 Sequestration Potential in Saline Formations, Oil and Gas Fields, Coal and Shale:

Production of Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer from FGD Waste Liquors

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

INSTRUCTIONS AND SAMPLE FORMAT FOR PREPARING A PETITION FOR VARIANCE FOR AN AQUIFER REMEDIATION ZONE OF DISCHARGE

Monitoring and Assessment of Chemical Quality. Session Objectives

This report was prepared by Stanley Abraham, Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil

Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration in the Northeast: Quantities and Costs

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Sulphur Removal From Sulcis Coal By Sequential Leaching With Koh Followed By H 2 o 2

In Situ Bioremediation of DNAPL Source Zones

Carbon Capture & Sequestration in the California Context

Chlorinated Solvent Contaminants in Arizona Aquifers

Remediation of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and vinyl chloride (VC) contaminated groundwater: lab and field pilot test.

OBSTACLES TO COMPLETE PCE DEGRADATION DURING REDUCTIVE DECHLORINATION

CO 2 Capture from Steam Methane Reformers: Commercial Scale Demonstration Project

HW6 - MGP Site Bioremediation

ANSTO Samples - 24 Hour Report

SILCOLAPSE, THE ART OF FOAM CONTROL

MPPE Systems WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Low-Temperature Heat Transfer Fluids Newer Options

ALTERNATIVE FUELS AND VEHICLES INFORMATION RESOURCES

Mock- Up Scrubber System

DESIGN FACTOR GUIDELINES FOR HIGH PRESSURE COMPOSITE HYDROGEN TANKS STP/PT-005

ETHICALCHEM BACKGROUND

IN SITU THERMAL REMEDIATION

Treatment Processes for Potable Water

The Subsurface Flow and Transport Experimental Laboratory: A New Department of Energy User s Facility for Intermediate-Scale Experimentation

Ingredient CAS Number Weight % ACGIH TLV PEL STEL Trichloroisocyanuric acid

NuScale SMR Technology

Nanotechnology for Site Remediation: Fate and Transport of Nanoparticles in Soil and Water Systems

GHS Classification: 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

75C Calcium Peroxide

Plant Background This plant rebuilds large industrial crankshafts that are distributed regionally. Over 4,000 jobs are completed each year by

MPPE Benefits. 1 Very High Separation Performance Reduction factor 1,000,000 times = % removal if required

Behavior of a Chlorinated Ethene Plume following Source-Area Treatment with Fenton s Reagent

METHOD 9013A CYANIDE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR SOLIDS AND OILS

The Basics of Alkaline In-Process Cleaning. for Metal Substrates. John Sparks Oakite Products, Inc. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey

Material Safety Data Sheet

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

J. M. Giaquinto J. M. Keller A. M. Meek Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN

STP-NU-018 CREEP-FATIGUE DATA AND EXISTING EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR GRADE 91 AND HASTELLOY XR

Ground Water Monitoring Wells

Diesel and Gasoline: Energy Heavyweights

Proof of Concept: Biocement for Road Repair

Li Junfeng Zhu Li Center For Renewable Energy Development, Energy Research Institute (China)

IXPER 75C Calcium Peroxide. Calcium Peroxide. Properties Product Data Sheet

Preparing for a Successful EVMS Certification

Use of ph Tolerant Bioaugmentation Cultures For Bioremediation at Low ph

Electrolytic Methods. By: Lindsey Douglass, Ryan Fiorillo, Hongli Lin, Daniel Mangieri, Nicole Miller, Richard Reube, and Luis Vergara Intriago

Criteria for Selecting a Jig or DMS

Transcription:

DE-FC2-93MC30097-57 Task.6 - Enhanced Mobility of Dense Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) Using Dissolved Humic Acids Semi-Annual Report January - June 30,997 By: Marc D. Kurz Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC2-93MC30097 For U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy Federal Energy Technology Center P.O. Box 880 Morgantown, West Virginia 26507-0880 BY Energy & Environmental Research Center University of North Dakota P. 0. Box 908 &and Forks, North Dakota 58202-90 8

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This report was prepared with the support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Technology Center Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC2-93MC30097. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of DOE. EERC DISCLAIMER LEGAL NOTICE This research report was prepared by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), an agency of the University of North Dakota, as an account of work sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy. Because of the research nature of the work performed, neither the EERC nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by the EERC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOFFIGURES....0 BACKGROUND 2.0 OBJECTIVES i...... 3.0 STATEMENTOFWORK...... 2 4.0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PLANS... 3 LIST OF FIGURES Leonardite-derived humic acid effects on TCE i... 2

TASK.6 - ENHANCED MOBILITY OF DENSE NONAQUEOUS-PHASELIQun>S (DNAPLs) USING DISSOLVED HUMIC ACIDS.0 BACKGROUND Chlorinated solvent contamination is widespread across the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex and other industrial facilities. Because of the physical properties of dense nonaqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs), current treatment technologies are generally incapable of completely removing contamination from the source area. Incomplete removal means that the residual DNAPL will persist as a long-term source of groundwater contamination. When DNALPs occur in the subsurface, they resist remediation, owing to low water solubility, high viscosity and interfacial tension, and microbial recalcitrance. Because of their high density and polarity, they are usually found sorbed to aquifer solids or in pools on impermeable materials. Surfactants have been used with some success to reduce interfacial tension between the aqueous and organic phases and improve solubility of DNAPLs. However, surfactants are expensive and toxic and exhibit an oxygen demand. An alternative is the use of dissolved humic acids in improving DNAPL mobilization and solubilization. Humic acids, a natural form of organic carbon, are abundant, inexpensive, and nontoxic; biodegrade slowly (low oxygen demand); and have excellent mobilization properties. The present work is to establish the feasibility of using humates for enhancing DNAPL remediation. 2.0 OBJECTIVES The specific objectives of this subtask are as follows: Evaluate the suitability of using humic acids to enhance the solubility and mobility of DNAPL contaminants sorbed to soils. Evaluate the toxicity and bioavailablity of the DNAPLs to biodegrading microorganisms. 3.0 STATEMENT OF WORK To meet the first objective, we are evaluating a set of humic acids (two) with different chemical compositions and polarities for the following: Ability of the humates to mobilize/solubilize selected (three) DNAPLs Effect of key aquatic chemical parameters @H, ironic strength, and calcium) on mobilizatiodsolubilization Mobilizatiodsolubilization in batch soil-water experiments (one soil) Removal rate via biotreatment with a well-established active microbial culture

4.0 ACCOMPLISHMENTS An analytical method was selected for the experiments under this subtask, and a calibration curve was constructed. This calibration curve is used to determine unknown contaminant concentrations in water being tested. The leonardite humic acid is derived by blending coal with a 0%sodium hydroxide solution until the mixture is entirely liquified. The solution is then allowed to settle, and the excess solid (approximately % by weight) is discarded. The yield is approximately a 9.0 wt% concentration of humic acids, which is then diluted to the needed concentrations, ranging from 0. % to 3 %. Several batch experiments were then completed using the leonardite humic acid and trichloroethylene (TCE) solution in distilled water. Data were then analyzed for the effect of the selected humic acid on the solubility of the TCE. Figure is an illustration of leonarditederived humic acid and its solubility effect on TCE. Batch experiments using other selected humic acids and chlorinated solvents are currently under way, with the data generated being used to design the water and soil batch experiments in the next phase of testing. Following completion of the water batch tests, soil interactions will be evaluated with soil/water batch tests using the same DNAPLs. Bioavailablity testing and tests to determine effects from water chemistry variations will be initiated in conjunction with these efforts. Figure. Leonardite-derived humic acid effects on TCE. 2

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND mrrure PLANS Humic acids have been shown to possess solubility- and mobilization-enhancing properties similar to these of artificial surfactants. These humic acids, due to their abundance and inexpensiveness, may prove to be an attractive alternative to using artificial surfactants to enhance pump-and-treat of various DNAPL compounds in the subsurface. Tests on varying humic acids and DNAPLs are continuing and will contribute to the development of a database of information on the effectiveness of each humate on a variety of chlorinated solvents.