Static Detonation Chamber Status Update

Similar documents
Processing of Rocket Motors at the Anniston Static Detonation Chamber (SDC)

NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE (NOC) WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR 63 SUBPART EEE FOR THE FIXED BOX INCINERATOR #2

SILLIKER, Inc. Southern California Laboratory 6360 Gateway Drive, Cypress, CA Tel. 209/ Fax. 714/

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

Combined Sewer Overflows July 2012-December 2013

Appendix C1: Batch Kinetics Tests

LABORATORY TURNAROUND TIMES AND CHARGES

Pilot Study Report. Z-92 Uranium Treatment Process

MANAGEMENT OF SONOMA COUNTY WILDFIRE DEBRIS

RE: Split Ash Sample Results October 2017 Charah Brickhaven Facility

CBH RESOURCES LIMITED BROKEN HILL OPERATIONS PTY LTD

Assured Monitoring Group

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Micro Methods Laboratory Quality Assurance Manual

SUB-Programs - Calibration range Fe Base for "PMI-MASTER Pro" Spark - mode Fe 000

Sonoma County Complex Fires Health Screening Level Guidance, Cleanup Goals and Background Data Sets

CLEAN WATER Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule. Schedule subject to change see ERA s website at

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT

Compliance Measurements. Mike Klein & Robert Kettig BTS (609)

REPORT NUMBER REPORT DATE SEND TO ISSUE DATE Apr 18, Apr 18, 2017 RECEIVED DATE Apr 05, 2017

Establishing Background Concentrations in Soil. Prepared pursuant to Section 64 of the Environmental Management Act. Version 9

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

The Determination of Toxic Metals in Waters and Wastes by Furnace Atomic Absorption

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LICENSE. ACZ Laboratories, Inc. AZ0102

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Newmont Mining Corporation Water Management Standard

MEMBRANES FOR WTPS JUSTIN RAK-BANVILLE, M.SC., P.CHEM., EP WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE WSP CANADA INC

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SERVICES DIVISION

9 Toxins / 11 Essential Minerals

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

AGL UPSTREAM INVESTMENTS PTY LTD GLOUCESTER GAS PROJECT

Drinking Water Analyses

VERMONT USED OIL ANALYSIS AND WASTE OIL FURNACE EMISSIONS STUDY

SURPLUS SOIL-MATERIAL REUSE REQUIREMENTS

New GCSE 4462/02 SCIENCE A HIGHER TIER CHEMISTRY 1

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

Douglas G. Brookins. Eh-pH Diagrams. for. Geochemistry. With 98 Figures and 61 Tables. Springer -Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo

COUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEVADA COUNTY CDA GUIDELINES FOR ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL AFTER A FIRE

Corrosion Studies on GeoBrom HG520

Chemistry/Science Unit C1: Chemistry in Our World

Strong Acid Leachable Metals (SALM) in Soil - Prescriptive

Coal Ash Material Safety

EXPORT SOIL-MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Nomenclature. A systematic method of writing chemical formulas and naming compounds

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Material Evaporation Application Comment MP P / Optical films, Oxide films, Electrical contacts. Doping, Electrical contacts.

GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER MONITORING DATA RELEASE 2013 SAMPLING EVENT SHALLOW LAND DISPOSAL AREA FUSRAP SITE

A.M. MONDAY, 18 January minutes

Final Report DMR-QA 36. NPDES Permit: IL DMR-QA Study. Open Date: 03/18/16. Close Date: 07/01/16. Report Issued Date: 07/29/16

CHAPTER 4 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

Table 1. VOCs Detections (all data in µg/l)

Chemical Speciation of Ultrafine Particulate Matter

Acceptance standards and charging rates for

Comparison of Dry Sorbent Injection of Sodium Bicarbonate, Lime, and Carbon and Their Control of Dioxins/Furans, Mercury, Chlorides and Sulfur Dioxide

4. Where do the names of the elements come from? Some were named as substances before they were known to be elements. sulfur 16

Environmental Protection Licence 2688

APPENDIX 8E SITE DISCHARGE WATER QUALITY MODELLING REPORT

Energy Northwest Environmental Services Lab

Comparison of EHC, EOS, and Solid Potassium Permanganate Pilot Studies for Reducing Residual TCE Contaminant Mass

AAS - Atomic Absorption Mono Element ppm Standard Solutions (Spectro ECON)

GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR

SALTON SEA SOLAR PONDS PILOT PROJECT

~ '2::5 - SUZANNE BLANCAFLOR, MS, MPH CHIEF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEAL TH SECTION D,!>~) STATE OF CONNECTICUT. Eurofins Lancaster Labs Environmental, LLC

A.M. MONDAY, 18 January minutes

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT. Solid Waste Management Facility Permit Otter Tail Power Co Hoot Lake Plant Action: PER009

Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives

4.0 SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA

WASTE CHARACTERIZATION: IN-SITU SOIL LOCATED AT ISRA OUTFALL 009 PLANNED EXCAVATION B1-1D

Air Quality Assessment

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SIERRA-CRETE TASK FORCE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF SIERRA-CRETE

AP Chemistry Reaction Set

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

BLACK STURGEON LAKES WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Chemistry/Additional Science

Jade Precision Engineering. Material Safety Data Sheet. Section I Product Identification. Section II: Composition / Information on Ingredient

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

2010 Drinking Water Quality Annual Report

FORM 26R CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RESIDUAL WASTE ANNUAL REPORT BY THE GENERATOR INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

DR 1900 PORTABLE SPECTROPHOTOMETER

APPROVAL FOR HAZARDOUS (BIOMEDICAL) WASTE INCINERATION PLANT FOR HOSPITALS

Price List. Prices valid until 31 December 2016

Xcel Energy Pawnee Station Bottom Ash Storage Pond and Ash Water Recovery Pond CCR Removal Certification

AP Chemistry Reaction Set

Chemical Waste Management, Inc. Emelle, Alabama EPA I.D. Number ALD FACT SHEET

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

High Purity Acids Trace Elemental Analysis. Detect as low as 1 to 100 ppt

The Release of Base Metals During Acidic Leaching of Fly Ash

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation

STAINLESS STEEL SHEETS

Mitton Industrial Cavitation Reactor Systems. Using Cavitation to Reclaim our World s Water

Operational Results from the Transportable Plasma Waste-to-Energy System at Hurlburt Field s Air Force Special Operations Command

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com. Pearson Edexcel GCSE Chemistry/Science Unit C1: Chemistry in Our World

A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO POWER PLANT TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORIES

Ironworker Safety Director Training Course. Steve Rank Executive Director of Safety and Health

Chemistry/Additional Science

Transcription:

Static Detonation Chamber Status Update 26 May 2017 Presented to: The 20 th Annual International Chemical Weapons Demilitarisation Conference Presented by: Tim Garrett Anniston Site Project Manager APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

Objective Provide information on Anniston Static Detonation Chamber s (SDC) support of Pueblo Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant (PCAPP) in processing explosive components Provide update on studies to determine viability of processing M67 Rocket Motors (RM) in the Anniston SDC Provide update on permitting actions to increase Net Explosive Weight (NEW) limits (Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA)/Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB)) Provide SDC emissions data From M67 RM testing Provide SDC emissions data from comprehensive performance test conducted while processing propellants 2

Anniston SDC Processing Information for PCAPP Explosive Components as of 8 May 2017 Quantity Received Quantity Destroyed Munition Type M67 Propellent, M1 with M28A2 Primer, from 105mm, 2.825 lbs NEW each 5,393 5,393 Charge, Burster M6, from 155mm, 0.429 lbs. NEW each 20,741 20,741 3

Update on Study to Determine Viability of Processing M67 Rocket Motors in the Anniston SDC-Phase 1 Anniston SDC Process D541 M1 propellant gradually increasing NEW up to approximately 23 pounds (lbs.) 80% of 23 lbs. > NEW of an M67 RM (18.13 lbs. NEW) Ramp-up began 27 Aug 15 Approximate 1 lb. Increments from 7.30 lbs. to 23.13 lbs. Maximum Feed Events of 23.13 lbs. Conducted on 22 and 23 Oct 15 Process M28 propellant grains from an M67 RM at approximately 23 lbs. Completed on 7 Jan 16 Feeds of 8.96 lbs., 14.25 lbs., and 23.12 lbs. Pressures within recommended values 4

Update on Study to Determine Viability of Processing M67 Rocket Motors in the Anniston SDC-Phase 2 Testing at Redstone Arsenal U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command High Temperature Test of M67 RM to determine how a RM will behave in the SDC First Test Conducted 6 Jan 16» Diesel Fuel Temperature reached 1004 F when RM ignited» Did not detonate» Casing failed as predicted at the fore cap 5

Update on Study to Determine Viability of Processing M67 Rocket Motors in the Anniston SDC-Phase 2 (continued) Testing at Redstone Arsenal U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command Second Test Conducted 23 Mar 16» Heat Blankets» Pressure Sensors Temperature reached 670 F when RM ignited Did not detonate Casing failed as predicted at the fore cap Total burn time was approximately 78 seconds 6

Video of M67 Rocket Motor Testing Conducted at Redstone Arsenal 7

Update on Study to Determine Viability of Processing M67 Rocket Motors in the Anniston SDC- Phase 2 (continued) Hydrostatic Testing at Redstone Arsenal U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center Hydrostatic Test of M67 RM casing to determine failure pressure and failure point Conducted 21 Apr 16 Results indicate failure point is the ejection of the fore cap at an average of 700 lbs. per square inch (psi) No evidence that a RM would detonate 8

Update on Study to Determine Viability of Processing M67 Rocket Motors in the Anniston SDC-Phase 3 Anniston SDC Processed 7 M67 RMs and 3 M67 RM grains in the Anniston SDC Conducted on 17 May 16 All operational parameters within normal ranges Conducted emissions test for information purposes All emissions results within permit limits All emissions results (including volatiles and semi-volatiles) less than modeled in the Environmental Risk Assessment No explosives detected 9

Operational Parameters From Phase 3 Testing Anniston SDC M-28 Propellant Grain/M-67 Rocket Motor Processing 17-May-16 Parameter Feed SDC PSI LC2 PSI Buffer Tank PSI THO F 260 psi max 180 psi max 87 psi max 2282 F max M28 grain 17.5 3.6 17.3 1806.8 M28 grain 20.7 3.4 16.9 2103.8 M28 grain 22.8 3.5 17.1 2103.2 M-67 Rocket 22.6 3.6 19.1 2084.0 M-67 Rocket 37.0 3.3 32.1 2064.7 M-67 Rocket 30.0 3.2 29.2 2077.4 M-67 Rocket 31.4 3.4 30.6 2067.7 M-67 Rocket 37.2 3.4 34.5 2081.7 M-67 Rocket 35.9 3.0 32.9 2075.7 M-67 Rocket 29.5 7.8 28.9 2085.7 10

Emissions Data from Phase 3 Testing Constituent Units Results CAA Permit Limit Carbon Monoxide lbs/hr 2.48 4.6 Total CDD/CDF ng-teq/dscm@7% O 2 <0.008 0.2 Chloride Equivalents ppmv@7% O 2 (ND) <0.266 21 Particulates gr/dscf@7% O 2 < 0.00088 0.013 lbs/hr - pounds per hour CDD/CDF - Chlorinated Dibenzo p-dioxin/furans ng-teq - nanograms-total Equivalent Quotient ppmv - parts per million volume gr/dscf - grams per dry standard cubic feet CAA - Clean Air Act ND - nondetect 11

Emissions Data from Phase 3 Testing - Metals Constituent Units Results Antimony g/s 1.73E-07 Arsenic g/s (ND) <9.12E-07 Barium g/s 3.04E-07 Beryllium g/s (ND) <1.52E-07 Boron g/s 9.33E-06 Cadmium g/s <8.34E-08 Chromium g/s 6.12E-07 Cobalt g/s 3.83E-08 Copper g/s 2.27E-06 Lead g/s 1.84E-07 Manganese g/s 4.97E-06 Mercury g/s <1.96E-07 Nickel g/s 6.55E-07 Phosphorus g/s <4.82E-06 Selenium g/s (ND) <9.12E-07 Silver g/s <2.51E-07 Thallium g/s <3.04E-07 Tin g/s (ND) 1.67E-05 Vanadium g/s <4.29E-07 Zinc g/s 2.90E-06 g/s - grams per second CAA - Clean Air Act ND - non-detect 12

Emissions Data from Phase 3 Testing Maximum Achievable Compliance Technologies (MACT) Metals Constituent Units Results CAA Permit Limit Arsenic, Beryllium & Chromium ug/dscm@7% O 2 <20.37 23 Cadmium & Lead ug/dscm@7% O 2 <3.25 10 Mercury ug/dscm@7% O 2 <2.38 8.1 CAA - Clean Air Act ug - microgram dscm - dry standard cubic meter MACT - Maximum Achievable Compliance Technologies 13

Feed Limit Increases Approved for Non-Mass Detonating Materials RCRA Permit Approved on 17 Feb 17 Increase from 6.7 lbs. NEW to 23 lbs. NEW DDESB Approved 8 Mar 17 Increase from 5.29 lbs. NEW to 18.4 lbs. NEW Approved processing of whole M67 RM 14

Comprehensive Performance Test Required by Permit and Clean Air Act Regulations Conducted 21-25 Mar 17 M1 Propellant 22.9 lbs. NEW per feed event Also fed Metal Oxides All emissions results acceptable Environmental Risk Assessment will be rerun with emissions results for this test No explosives fed detected 15

Preliminary Emissions Data from Comprehensive Performance Test Constituent Units Results CAA Permit Limit Sulfur Dioxide lbs/hr 0.0059 7.20 Nitrogen Oxides lbs/hr *1.18 0.80 Carbon Monoxide lbs/hr *5.99 4.6 Total CDD/CDF ng-teq/dscm@7% O 2 <0.0018 0.2 Chloride Equivalents ppmv@7% O 2 (ND) <0.154 21 Particulates gr/dscf@7% O 2 <0.00063 0.013 Results are an average of 3 runs * CAA Permit modification pending. Limits will be representative of CPT results. lbs/hr - pounds per hour CDD/CDF - Chlorinated Dibenzo p-dioxin/furans ng-teq - nanograms-total Equivalent Quotient ppmv - parts per million volume gr/dscf - grams per dry standard cubic feet CAA - Clean Air Act ND - nondetect 16

Preliminary Emissions Data from Comprehensive Performance Test - Metals g/s - grams per second CAA - Clean Air Act ND - non-detect Constituent Units Results Antimony g/s 2.19E-07 Arsenic g/s <2.19E-07 Barium g/s 4.05E-07 Beryllium g/s <7.74E-08 (ND) Boron g/s <9.11E-06 Cadmium g/s <6.64E-08 Chromium g/s 1.85E-07 Cobalt g/s <1.29E-06 Copper g/s 9.60E-07 Lead g/s <3.08E-07 Manganese g/s 3.08E-07 Mercury g/s <1.10E-07(ND) Nickel g/s 1.02E-07 Phosphorus g/s <2.44E-06 Selenium g/s <3.10E-07(ND) Silver g/s <1.55E-07(ND) Thallium g/s <3.10E-07(ND) Tin g/s <8.51E-06(ND) Vanadium g/s <3.24E-07 Zinc g/s 1.13E-06 Results are an average of 3 runs 17

Preliminary Emissions Data from Comprehensive Performance Test - MACT Metals Constituent Units Results CAA Permit Limit Arsenic, Beryllium & Chromium ug/dscm@7% O 2 <4.47 23 Cadmium & Lead ug/dscm@7% O 2 <3.46 10 Mercury ug/dscm@7% O 2 <1.02 (ND) 8.1 Results are an average of 3 runs CAA - Clean Air Act ug - microgram dscm - dry standard cubic meter MACT - Maximum Achievable Compliance Technologies 18

Conclusions Anniston SDC meeting PCAPP mission requirements Anniston SDC capable of destroying up to 23 lbs. NEW Anniston SDC capable of destroying RMs Anniston SDC continues to meet RCRA and CAA Permit requirements 19

Questions? www.pmacwa.army.mil CONNECT WITH PEO ACWA www.peoacwa.army.mil ACWA Facebook Page www.facebook.com/peoacwa ACWA Twitter Page www.twitter.com/acwanews ACWA Instagram www.instagram.com/peoacwa ACWA Flickr Photostream www.flickr.com/photos/acwa ACWA YouTube Channel www.youtube.com/usaeacwa 20