Application nr. 6 (Connections) Strength of welded connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

Similar documents
Two-way slabs. Flat plate with or without drop panels / capitals

Joints / Fixed Joints

Lecture Retaining Wall Week 12

VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Stair cases

Basic principle and methodology of weld joints design

Chapter Five Torsion. Reinforced Concrete Structures 2 (CEng-3122)

Chapter 2 The Structural Hot-Spot Stress Approach to Fatigue Analysis

Structural Design of Pergola with Airfoil Louvers

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

R-Group Finland Oy. REA Lifting Inserts Technical Manual According to Eurocodes, EU Machinery directive 2006/42/EC and VDI/BV-BS 6205 CE Approved

Contents. Tables. Notation xii Latin upper case letters Latin lower case letters Greek upper case letters Greek lower case letters. Foreword.

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016

Determination of Failure Strength of Flat Plate Weld Joint Using Finite Element Analysis

DETERMINATION OF FAILURE STRENGTH OF CURVED PLATE WELD JOINT USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Ultimate and serviceability limit state optimization of cold-formed steel hat-shaped beams

APPENDIX B ABC STRUCTURES DESIGN GUIDE

Council on Tall Buildings

Structural Analysis A: Statically Determinate Structures

Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining Wall

MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS - II

Chapter. Masonry Design

Displacement Based Assessment and Improvement of a Typical New Zealand Building by an Average Engineer

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

On The Plastic Design Of Timber Beams With A Complex Cross-Section

Post-tensioned prestressed concrete bridge - assignment

ST7008 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

DIRECT DESIGN METHOD DDM

St.MARTIN S ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Seismic assessment of horizontal cylindrical reservoirs

Figure 1 Example of HSS column splice

Steel Connection Design

Design for Shear for Prestressed Concrete Beam

RELIABILITY OF SEISMIC LINKS IN ECCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES

Experimental Tests and Numerical Modelling on Slender Steel Columns at High Temperatures

R-Group Finland Oy. RTA, RWTL and RWTS Lifting anchors Design instructions

Overview of the tubular test tower

Torsion in tridimensional composite truss bridge decks

CHAPTER 9 STAIR CASES 9.1 GENERAL FEATURES 9.2 TYPES OF STAIR CASES

Verification of Welded eaves moment connection of open sections

Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

5.4 Analysis for Torsion

Chapter 3: Torsion. Chapter 4: Shear and Moment Diagram. Chapter 5: Stresses In beams

Hyperstatic (Secondary) Actions In Prestressing and Their Computation

Types of Foundations

Effect of lateral support of compression flange to stability of beam-columns

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE

CE 329 Structural Analysis. Fall 2008

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

IZODOM 2000 POLSKA Zduńska Wola, ul. Ceramiczna 2. tel , , tel./fax

Numerical study of shear wall behavior coupled with HPFRCC beam and diagonal reinforcements

SAMPLE TC6K Elevator Design Summary. Order No PO-47201

Development of W-Truss System

Schöck Isokorb type CV

Interpretation of SECTION 12 DESIGN AND DETAILING FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADS IS

PORTAL FRAMES 1.0 INTRODUCTION

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR OF HOLLOW STEEL SECTIONS UNDER COMBINED AXIAL COMPRESSION AND BENDING

Shear Wall Design Manual CSA A

There are countless ways to improve constructability on your next project. Here are 50 of them. the need for it or specify it on the design drawings.

EN REINFORCED MASONRY DESIGN EXAMPLE 1 (NOTE: THIS USES THE UK NATIONAL ANNEX NDP VALUES)

Jurnal Teknologi STEEL WEIGHT SAVING DEVELOPED FROM SEMI- CONTINUOUS CONSTRUCTION IN MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME BASED ON EURO-CODE 3.

Improvement of Technological Solutions for Sheet Piling Walls Made of U-Shape Piles

Figure 1 Shear wall segments with mono-sloped top plates

Example Of Stell Beam Design To Eurocode

Product Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.

ROK HCS slab support Design instructions

Renovation of Buildings using Steel Technologies (ROBUST)

E APPENDIX. The following problems are intended for solution using finite element. Problems for Computer Solution E.1 CHAPTER 3

Substructure systems, specifically retaining walls

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 2017

Trusses. 4.1 Introduction

Fundamentals for Steel Constructions

Statics Chapter 6 Structural Analysis Eng. Iqbal Marie Hibbeler, Engineering Mechanics: Statics,13e, Prentice Hall

Shear Wall Design Manual ACI

X-HVB shear connectors

European Technical Assessment ETA-10/0422 of 08/01/2016

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

Compressive strength of double-bottom under alternate hold loading condition

RUUKKI FORMA DESIGN INSTRUCTION

mortarless Design Manual Part 1 (AS 3600:2009) Section 1 Page 1 AS 3600:2009 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

Fagà, Bianco, Bolognini, and Nascimbene 3rd fib International Congress

The American Institute

Flat Slabs. d 2. A typical flat slab (without drop and column head)

Scientific Seminar Design of Steel and Timber Structures SPbU, May 21, 2015

Analysis of Shear Wall Transfer Beam Structure LEI KA HOU

Graphic truss analysis. Graphic truss analysis Copyright Prof Schierle

IIW Guideline for the Assessment of Weld Root Fatigue

Review of Design Flexural Strengths of Steel Concrete Composite Beams for Building Structures

Stress Distribution in Masonry Walls, Loaded in Plane, Simulated with Comsol.

Composite Beam Design Manual AISC

The Behaviour of Beam-Column Elements with Variable I Cross-Sections considering Lateral Restraints

FEM STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTORS FOR FILLET WELDED CHS-PLATE T-JOINT

Shear Wall Design Manual

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR HELICAL PILE SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PREFACE

Residual Stress Pattern of Stainless Steel SHS

Panduit Corporation Tinley Park, Illinois. Outset and Inset Cabinets Seismic Load Rating and Anchorage Design

Single-Span Steel Beam STT

EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT BRIDGE COMPETITION STUDENT GUIDELINES

Structural Glossary. ARCH 631 Structural Glossary F2014abn

Concrete and Masonry structures 3

Compressive strength of double-bottom under alternate hold loading condition

Transcription:

Application nr. 6 (Connections) Strength of welded connections to EN 1993-1-8 (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

PART 1: Design of a fillet weld connection in shear

Initial data of the problem: Given two overlapping plates with the following dimensions: Plate 1: width = b 1 =40 mm; thickness=t 1 =15 mm Plate : width = b = 300 mm; thickness = t = 1 mm Steel grade of the plates: S35 An overlapping welded connection is required between plates under axial force N = 70 kn

Geometry of the proposed connection and loading:

Comment on problem required result: Two fillet welds are required, connecting Plate 1 to Plate (see previous drawing) and resisting the axial force N; A shear effect is produced between the two plates which tend to move in opposite directions under the effect of axial load; The unknown elements in this phase (to be found out as a result) are the weld effective length (l) and throat thickness (a) for the fillet weld.

Design resistance of the fillet weld: simplified method of EN 1993-1-8 According to the code, the design resistance of a fillet weld may be assumed to be adequate if, at every point along its length, the resultant of all the forces per unit length transmitted by the weld, satisfy the following criterion: F w,ed F w,rd

In the previous formula: F w,ed = is the design value of the weld force per unit length (from load action); F w,rd = is the design weld resistance per unit length;

a) Sizing of the weld (finding weld length and weld throat thickness): The following equation of equilibrium is used (from eq.4.): Where, in our case: F Total F Total w, Ed w, Rd Total wed F N 70kN, (total weld force)

Weld resistance: According to the simplified code method (ch. 4.5.3.3), the weld resistance is given by the formula: F Total f a l w, Rd vw. d Number of welds in our case and (f vw.d ) is the design strength of the weld

Design strength of the weld (eq. 4.4): with: f vw. d fu 3 w M f u = 340 N/mm (ultimate strength for S35 steel of the plates) w = 0,8 (correction factor for fillet welds, table 4.1) M = 1,5

Previous formula gives: 340 f 196.3 N / mm vw. d 0,8 1, 5 3

In the weld resistance formula: (a) = throat thickness of the weld; (l) = effective length of the weld These two elements are both unknown. They appear simultaneously in a single equation, which normally makes impossible any solution!

This is a typical engineer problem! The solution is obtained by imposing one of this two unknown values, based on the previous experience of the designer Usually we impose the (a) value, i.e. the throat thickness of the weld; As required by the code, this value should be: a > 3,0 mm

Imposing (a) value and calculation of the weld resistance: Let s impose: a = 5,0 mm In this case, using previously determined data, we get: F, 196.35l Total wrd And consequently: A [mm] 70000 70000 196.3l l 367 mm 196.3

Comment on the obtained result: As the code does not prescribe a superior limit for the weld effective length, we will adopt the following value as actual value of the length: l act = 370 mm As required by the code, the effective length value should be larger than the prescribed minimum limit: l act > l min =30 mm (l min =6a =30 mm) OK!

b) Checking of the weld: The obtained welding has now the geometry (dimensions) presented in the next figure

Geometry of the fillet weld (to be shown on technical drawing):

Comment on the weld symbol: The weld symbol for a fillet weld includes: - an arrow showing the weld seam position on the connection drawing; - number 5 which indicates the weld throat thickness in [mm] -a triangle indicating a single side fillet weld (type of weld) - number 370 indicating the length of the fillet weld in [mm]

The design throat area of the weld: A al53703700mm w The design value of the weld force per unit length becomes: N 70000 FwEd, 194.6 N / mm A 3700 w

The design resistance per unit length of the weld: F w,rd = 1963 dan/cm (calculated before) Obviously: F w,ed < F w,rd This concludes the checking procedure.

PART : Design of a fillet weld connection in bending and shear (using directional method, ch.4.5.3.)

Cantilever plate under shear and axial force applied at its end V l 1 N L [m] a l 1 (double side fillet weld)

Initial data: Cantilever span: L=1, m Loading at cantilever end: V = 150 kn N = 100 kn Steel grade (of the plate): S355 Plate cross-section = 0 X 500 mm Welded connection using a double side fillet weld

Required: Checking of the fillet weld connection under bending and shear for a weld throat thickness: a = 10 mm Two such fillet welds are used to connect the cantilever onto the support (Effective length of the weld: l 1 = 500 mm)

Resulting data: For S355 steel: f y = 355 N/mm f u = 50 N/mm

Diagrams of internal efforts: 150 T [kn] 100 180 N [kn] M [knm]

0 Welding geometry: Steel plate Geometrical characteristics of the fillet weld (two 1,0 x 50,0 rectangles): Weld area: 500 3 3 A w = 10 500 = 10000 mm Section modulus of the two weld rectangles (fillet weld): W 3 = (10 x 500 / 6) x = 833000 mm 3 Weld (rectangle) 10

Correspondence between internal efforts and weld stresses: The resistance of the weld has to be checked under a complex state of internal efforts (N,T,M) generating different types of stresses, i.e. N = generating ( N ); T = generating ( II ); M = generating ( M ): variable; Observation: = 0!

Weld 3D state of stress in the code (fig. 4.5):

Stress diagrams on fillet weld: Point 1 II V A w N N A w M M W 3

Checking =performed in point 1 using the following stresses: ( =0!) = in the weld plan, perpendicular to weld and constant all over the height ( II ) = in the weld plan, parallel to the weld and constant all over the height ( ) = perpendicular to welding plan and variable all over the height (maximum value in point 1)

Calculation of stress values: 3 / 61 161 100 / 161 833 1800000 / 100 100,0 10000 / 10 100,0 1000 cm dan cm dan W M cm dan A N cm dan A V M w N w II

Checking formula for the fillet weld, according to EN 1993-1-8 (eq. 4.1): 0,5 3 M u M w u II f f Where w = 0,9 (correlation factor from Table 4.1)

Application of the checking relations: 500 0,9 1,5 0,5 61 3 0 10 71daN / cm 46daN / cm 500 61 4160daN / cm 1,5 Checking OK! Checking OK! Conclusion: Fillet weld too strong! Diminishing weld throat thickness to 6 8 mm would be recommendable (beneficial for welding procedure)!

PART 3: Design of the fillet weld connection for a double angle section

Geometry and initial data: Fillet weld x N=400 kn Fillet weld x L 80 x 80 x 8 Gusset plate (t=1 mm)

Initial data: Member cross section = L 80x80x8 Angle leg b = 80 mm Steel grade: S35 Gusset thickness: t=1 mm Axial force on member: N = 300 kn f y = 35 N/mm f u = 370 N/mm

Member cross-section geometry: x Fillet weld L 80 x 80 x 8 80 mm e =57,4 e 1 =,6 Gusset plate Centre of gravity of the member cross-section x Fillet weld

Effect of weld eccentricity: Fillet weld 40 40 C W e 1 =,6 1 N Fillet weld Centre of gravity of the welding

Explanation of eccentricity: The axial force N is acting at the level of the centre of gravity of the member (i.e. at distance e 1 =,6 mm from angle corner) If a symmetric welding is used (the bottom and the upper fillet weld are identical) then the centre of gravity of the welding, will be located at angle leg mid height (40 mm from angle corner).

Eccentricity (): The distance 1 =40mm-,6mm between the centre of gravity of the welding and the direction of the force is called eccentricity The force N is an eccentric force with respect to the centre of gravity of the welding; Because of this eccentricity, a supplementary bending moment (M w ) appears in the plan of the welding, i.e. M w = N 1

Reduction of the force N in the centre of gravity of the welding C w Upper seam N 1 C 1 C W N b=80 M w Bottom seam N 1 C 1

Distribution of the shear forces on the weld seams The axial force N and the bending moment M w generate shear forces into the weld seams: The axial force N is equally distributed on both seams, i.e. N 1 = N/; The bending moment generates a couple of forces: M w = C 1 b C 1 = M w /b

The maximum shear effect appears in the upper seam: In the upper seam both components (N 1 and C 1 ) have the same sense: their resultant (F R ) is maximum: N N F N C 1 R 1 1 b In the bottom seam the components are opposite and the shear force is lower!

Simplified method to check the resistance of the upper weld: Checking relation: F w,ed F w,rd in which: F w,ed = design value of the weld force per unit length F w,rd = design weld resistance per unit length

Weld dimensions are imposed: Weld throat thickness: a = 5 mm > a min =3mm Weld length: l 1 = 10 mm

Calculation of the weld force per unit length: F F R w, ED 300 300 40,6 15kN 80 FR 15000 895,8 N / mm l 10 1 15000N

Calculation of the design shear strength of the weld: F f w, Rd vw. d f vw. d f a u 3 w M Where: a= 5 mm =weld throat thickness (imposed) w = 0,8 (from Table 4.1 of the code, for S35 steel) M = 1,5

Calculation (): f F vw. d w, Rd a 3 370 13,6 N / mm 0,8 1,5 f vw. d 5 13,6 1068 N / mm F w, ED Checking OK OBSERVATION: If the relation does not check as required, the dimensions of the weld should be increased (higher value for the weld throat thickness a or higher value for the seam length l 1 ). The procedure is repeated until checking OK.

SECOND METHOD to connect the angle section member to the gusset plate: (Improved system which avoids the eccentricity of axial force N)

How to avoid N eccentricity towards the centre of gravity of the weld? The centre of gravity of the weld should be moved upwards and located on member longitudinal axis (thus 1 = 0!) The longitudinal axis of the member passes through the centre of gravity of the L80x80x8 section; Unequal weld seams are used to that purpose (the upper weld seam larger than the bottom weld seam)

Unequal weld connection: Fillet weld 1 (A s1 ;l 1 ;a 1 ) e =b-e 1 e 1 C W N 1 e 1 =,6 b N Fillet weld (A s ;l ;a ) N Centre of gravity of the welding

Condition for the two unequal welds to have the centre of gravity on member axis: The static moment of the welds with respect to member axis should be identical (equal): Static moment of weld 1: S w1 =A s1 x e 1 Static moment of weld : S w =A s x e CONDITION: S w1 = S w

Notations: In previous drawing and relations: A s1 ; A s = areas of the unequal welding l 1 ; l =effective lengths of unequal welding a 1 ; a =weld throat thickness of each welding

Total area of the weld (A s ): If the axial force N is acting centrically, no bending moment occurs in the connection (M w = 0); Under axial force (N) only, a simple sizing of the weld is possible: i.e. calculation of the overall area of the welding (A s )

To calculate the overall area of the weld (A s ), the following equation of equilibrium is used: N A s f A vw. d s f N vw. d Where: f f 370 u vw. d 13,6 N / 3 w M 3 0,8 1,5 mm

The overall (total) area of the weld results: A s f N vw. d 300000 13,6 1404mm This is the sum of unequal areas for the upper and bottom welds: A s A A s1 s

However, the problem is not yet solved! The final purpose of the designer is to find the effective length (l) and the throat thickness (a) for each of the two unequal fillet welds; Therefore, the unknown elements in this stage of the problem are: -l 1 and a 1 for weld 1 (and A s1 =x l 1 x a 1 ); -l and a for weld (and A s =x l x a );.

To find the unknown dimensions, we will use the previously established relations, as a system of equations: s s s s s A A A e A e A 1 1 1 Equal static moments Overall area of welding In upper system, A s1 and A s are the unknown

By solving the system, the unknown values of area result: b e A e e e A A b e b A e e e A A s s s s s s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 In which b is the length of angle leg and e 1 is the distance from angle corner to angle centre of gravity. Both these values are known (found in profile tables for angle section)!

In our particular case: A A s1 s 80,6 1404 1007mm 80,6 1404 397 mm 80 To find weld unknown dimensions, we write: A A s1 s 1007 l 397 l 1 a a 1

Again, this is a typical engineer problem: two equations and four unknown! To solve the problem, the values of the throat thickness a 1 and a are imposed It is also recommended that a 1 =a +1mm (in order to avoid excessive length l 1 of upper weld seam) Imposing: a =4mm > a min =3mm, then a 1 results: a 1 =4mm+1mm = 5 mm

The unknown effective length for the unequal welding result: A A s1 s 1007 397 l l 1 5 l 4 l 1 100mm 50mm Checking of the code minimum length condition for each weld: l 1 > 6 a 1 = 6 x 5,0 = 30 mm; l > 6 a = 6 x 4,0 = 4 mm; l > 30 mm

The real length of the welding: The real length of the welding (written on the weld symbol on the technical drawings of the project) should include the end returns of the weld seam: l 1R =l 1 + a 1 (rounding to an increased value multiple of 5 mm!) l R =l + a (rounding to an increased value multiple of 5 mm!)

In our particular case: l R1 = l 1 + a 1 = 100 + 5 = 110 mm l R = l + a = 50 + 4 = 58 mm 60 mm

Symbols for the welding: 5 110 4 60

Final checking of the unequal welding: The axial force N is distributed in unequal parts to each welding, using the same principle (in fact proportional to the area of each weld): N N 1 b e1 80,6 N 300000 1550 b 80 e1,6 N 300000 84750 N b 80 N

To check the welding the simplified procedure will be used: Checking relation: in which: F w,ed F w,rd F F w, Ed1 w, Ed N l N 1 1 l 1550 1076 100 84750 848 N 50 N / mm / mm

The design weld resistance per unit length: F F w, Rd1 w, Rd a a 1 f vw. d f vw. d 5,0 13,6 1068 N / mm 4,0 13,6 854,4 N / mm F w. ED1 F w. ED Checking OK!