Landfill Cover Design and Operation

Similar documents
Bioreactor Landfill Design

(1) All sanitary landfill facilities, at a minimum, shall include the following:

Drainage geocomposite workshop

2. Pavement Materials: Consist of flexible or rigid pavements, typically HMA or PCC, respectively, or a composite of the two.

SWANA - NYS Chapter Landfill/Bioreactor/Leachate Recirculation

Major Parameters that Affect Outcome of Landfill Slope Stability Modeling

Written Post-Closure Plan. Pawnee Station - Active CCR Landfill Public Service Company of Colorado Denver Colorado

CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Fly Ash Reservoir 1 Landfill Cardinal Plant Brilliant, Ohio. September, 2016

Leachate Recirculation and Biogas Collection Methodologies in Bioreactors

CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE PLAN JAMES RIVER POWER STATION UTILITY WASTE LANDFILL CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI

Waste Management Control Strategies for Landfills. Robert E. Landreth

Geosynthetics Cost/Benefit Analysis for the Development of a Landfill Expansion Module in Monterey, California

Advances in Design of Landfills Over CCR Ponds and Landfills

PERVIOUS PAVEMENT. Alternative Names: Permeable Pavement, Porous Concrete, Porous Pavers

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. INDEPENDENCE PLANT CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R2 AFIN

Bioreactor Landfills An Innovative Technology for Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste

Closure Plan Ash Disposal Area PGE Boardman Power Plant

Landfill Gas Systems

CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (b) Document No. GERS Stingy Run Flyash Pond. Gavin Plant Cheshire, Ohio. October, 2016

(Instructions and explanations of bid items and sources of unit costs are provided on the back of this page.)

Sustainable Landfill Design by Monitoring and Managing Cap Infiltration

POST CLOSURE PLAN. CFR (d) GERS Landfill. Pirkey Plant Hallsville, Texas. October, 2016

GRI Standard GC8 * Determination of the Allowable Flow Rate of a Drainage Geocomposite

Geoenvironmental impact assessment of a landfill for solid chemical wastes

Section 8: Amended Soil Mounds. 8. Amended Soil Mounds

Subtitle D Municipal Landfills vs Classical Sanitary Landfills: Are Subtitle D Landfills a Real Improvement?

Bentofix continues to develop technological advantages for your industry.

Initial Closure Plan Slag Pond. Nelson Dewey Generating Station. Wisconsin Power and Light Company. Prepared for:

Advanced Synthetic Grass Geomembrane Liner For Long-Term Environmental Closure

Types of Inspections. Prior to Inspection. Types of Inspections. Typical Inspection Equipment. Embankment Dams

LANDFILL CLOSURE PLAN PLUM POINT ENERGY STATION CLASS 3N CCR LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N AFIN:

New techniques for stabilizing, amending and revegetating mine waste

Geoguide 6 The New Guide to Reinforced Fill Structure and Slope Design in Hong Kong

BENTOMAT CL GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER SPECIFICATION GUIDELINES

IMPROVING LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY Recent Evaluations, Results of Large Scale Tests in California, United States

Water Balance Covers for Waste Containment: Principles and Practice

APLICACIONES DE GEOMEMBRANAS y GEOSINTHETIC CLAY LINERS GCL S

NAUGHTON POWER PLANT NORTH ASH POND INITIAL CLOSURE PLAN

Leachate Management Leachate Control and Collection

SOIL AND THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE

2016 Annual Dam and Dike Inspection Report

Las Pulgas Landfill Phase I Clean Closure Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Ca

Leachate Percolation through Failed Geomembrane of a Geo-Composite Soil Barrier

Ottumwa Generating Station Project No Closure Plan for Existing CCR Revision: 0 Surface Impoundments TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Director Paul R. Clifford. Research Directors

Licensing International Engineers into the Profession (LIEP)

FINAL COVER MATERIAL PROPERTIES

DATE: December 10, 2012 REPORT NO. PW CHAIR AND MEMBERS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION

STATE-OF-THE PRACTICE REVIEW OF BIOREACTOR LANDILLS

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012 STANDARD FOR GRASSED WATERWAYS. Definition. Purpose

Lecture 19. Landfill hydrology

Of vital importance..

Design and Operation of Landfills

Annual Inspection Report

Indian Health Service Sanitation Facilities Construction Program Wastewater Lagoon Operation & Maintenance

FULL SCALE OPERATION OF A UNIQUE LANDFILL BIOREACTOR: THE CALGARY BIOCELL

Closure Plan Brame Fly Ash Pond

DRAINAGE & DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM

Sealing Leaking Ponds

Solar Facilities on Landfills Engineering, Permitting, Construction, and Lessons Learned. Engineering from Site Approval through Construction

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods & Strategies

Water management: Table Of Contents

Introduction to the Properties of Clay Minerals

David E. Daniel University of Illinois, College of Engineering, Urbana, IL, USA

A detailed guide and sizing manual for the application of Silva Cells to meet the requirements of bioretention under paving.

Mr. Paul Dunlap, California Department of Water Resources

2016 LANDFILL INSPECTION REPORT CARDINAL PLANT BRILLIANT, OHIO

David Miller, P.E.- Atlanta. The New Coal Ash Regulations Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Lecture 11: Water Flow; Soils and the Hydrologic Cycle

ANCHORAGE REGIONAL LANDFILL ANCHORAGE, ALASKA LANDFILL GAS COLLECTION AND CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PLAN

RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION CENTER ON-LOT SYSTEMS AND SMALL FLOW TECHNOLOGIES DELAWARE VALLEY COLLEGE DOYLESTOWN, PA

Issue paper: Aquifer Water Balance

Edward O'Donnell Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC (301)

Factors Affecting the Clogging of Leachate Collection Systems in MSW Landfills

Infiltration Guidelines

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AT THE MANAGED SOLID WASTE LANDFILL

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) secondary containment requirements for aboveground oil storage tanks (18 AAC 75.

Cover systems that utilise the moisture store-and-release concept do they work and how can we improve their design and performance?

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

SMART GYPSUM STACK MANAGEMENT FROM CONCEPT TO REALITY

MSE Walls Problems and Solutions

YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CONTROLLED LANDFILL PROGRAM RESULTS YEARS OPERATION

Soil Treatment Facility Design and Operation for Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Version 1.0

Groundwater Monitoring Requirements of the CCR Rule What s Next?

In-Situ Coal Combustion Products Impoundment Closure/Remediation Strategy

The Hydrological Cycle. Hydrological Cycle. Definition of Terms. Soils and Water, Spring Lecture 7, The Hydrological Cycle 1

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N-R3 AFIN:

Bioreactor Landfills An Innovative Technology for Biostabilization of Municipal Solid Waste

Design Criteria and Construction of a Capillary Barrier Cover System: The Rocky Mountain Arsenal Experience

The concept of sustainable landfills

Instrumentation and Process Control

Design of Geofoam Embankment for the. Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. Research Project Manager, UDOT

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 836 SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL WITH TURF REINFORCING MAT January 18, 2013

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A BIOREACTOR AND AN ENGINEERED LANDFILL FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TREATMENT

LANDFILL DESIGN - OVERVIEW. ABSTRACT This module gives an overview of landfill design, with some perspective on design calculations as well.

East Maui Watershed Partnership Adapted from Utah State University and University of Wisconsin Ground Water Project Ages 7 th -Adult

Closed Landfill Issues:

PROJECT AT THE DENVER

Design of the Eldorado Gold Efemçukuru Filtered Tailings Facility

Effect of Waste Settlement and Seismic Loading on the Integrity of. Geomembrane Barrier Systems. Xuan Wu

Transcription:

Landfill Cover Design and Operation USEPA Workshop on Bioreactor Landfills Beth A. Gross, P.E. GeoSyntec Consultants

Engineered Systems at Landfills Gas Collection and Removal System Surface-Water Management System Cover System S o l i d W a s t e Leachate Collection and Removal System Double Liner System

Cover System Components Surface/ Protection Layer Composite Barrier Gas Collection Layer Drainage Layer Foundation Layer Waste

Component Functions Surface Layer Resist erosion by wind and water Be maintainable Promote vegetation, if present Satisfy aesthetic, ecological, or end use criteria Protection Layer Protect underlying layers from erosion and exposure to damaging environments (freeze-thaw, desiccation, ultraviolet light) Serve as a biobarrier Store water for vegetation, if present

Component Functions Drainage Layer Limit hydraulic head on the barrier Drain the overlying soil layers Reduce seepage forces above the barrier Hydraulic Barrier Minimize percolation Restrict gas emissions

Component Functions Gas Collection Layer Convey gas to a collection point Limit pressure head beneath the barrier May generally be needed for operating bioreactors with a final cover system Foundation Layer Provide grade control and smooth surface Provide adequate bearing capacity for overlying layers Reduce differential settlements in overlying layers

Minimum Criteria Cover System for Modern MSW Landfills (40 CFR 258.60) Minimize infiltration to prevent the bathtub effect Minimize erosion 6-in. Erosion Layer 18-in. Barrier Layer (k 10-5 cm/s) Waste GM Barrier Not a complete design: missing drainage layer, gas collection layer, etc.

Liquids Management Strategy EPA regulations for cover systems have evolved within a liquids management strategy framework minimizing leachate generation by keeping liquids out of the landfill detecting, collecting, and removing leachate as it is generated Draft EPA cover system guidance: for MSW landfills, maximum cover system percolation rate of 0.1 to 1 mm/yr should prevent bathtub effect.

Leachate Generation Rates Over Time (Bonaparte, 1995) Leachate Generation Rate (liters/hectare/day) 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Active Filling Cover Installed Date Cell Closed (Cover System with GM Barrier) MSW Landfill in Pennsylvania Jan-89 Jan-90 Jan-91 Jan-92 Jan-93 Jan-94

Questions What are the special considerations for designing a cover system (interim or final) for a bioreactor landfill? What characteristics are important for an interim cover system? What is the best time frame for constructing a final cover system over a bioreactor landfill?

Special Conditions: Bioreactor Landfills vs. Conventional Landfills Increased rate of gas generation (but shorter time frame for exposure of cover system components to gas constituents) With more moisture in the waste, greater potential for leachate seeps Increased settlements due to increased degradation and higher waste unit weight Decreased slope stability due to higher waste unit weight and lower shear strength

Cover System Design Issues Layer Surface Layer Protection Layer Drainage Layer Factor Erosion by water and/or air Evapotranspiration Native versus exotic vegetation Post-closure land use Erosion by water Evapotranspiration Slope instability due to pore pressure buildup Animal burrows Deep root penetration Excessive clogging Insufficient flow rate capacity Insufficient number or flow rate capacity of outlets

Cover System Design Issues Layer Barrier Gas Collection Layer Foundation Layer Factor Cracking due to desiccation (wet/dry or freeze/thaw cycling) Deformations from waste settlement,, or seismic motions Root penetration Insufficient resistance to gas flow Slope instability Creep of all materials (CCL, GCL, GM, asphalt) Insufficient coverage over waste Insufficient flow capacity Insufficient strength Insufficient slope (inadequate( grading or post- construction settlement)

Interim Cover During Bioreactor Operation

Relative Performance of Different Interim Cover Materials Relatively Permeable Soil Less Permeable Soil Includes GM Barrier Infiltration Over Waste Surface High Medium Low Concern with Deformation Low Medium to High Medium to High Potential for Leachate Seeps High Medium Low Potential for Gas Emissions/Air Intrusion High Medium Low Potential for Erosion Low Medium Low to High Operations and Maintenance Low Medium to High Medium to High End Use Flexibility High Medium to High Low to Medium

Final Cover System Installation If a final cover system is constructed during bioreactor operations, it may require more maintenance than an interim cover and, potentially, some reconstruction after the waste has stabilized. For increased design flexibility, the final cover should be constructed after waste has been sufficiently stabilized. When a soil interim cover is proposed, its performance should be monitored and, if necessary, an interim cover that incorporates a geomembrane or a final cover system should be installed. The final cover system should be designed to prevent the bathtub effect.

Final Thoughts The design considerations for a bioreactor landfill cover system (interim or final) depend on when the cover is to be constructed. For example, when a final cover system is constructed at the end of bioreactor operations, gas and infiltration control and the ability to tolerate deformations would less important than if the cover system was constructed during bioreactor operations. When a final cover system is constructed over a stabilized landfill there is more flexibility in design (e.g., alternative materials). An interim cover consisting of a relatively permeable soil layer may enhance bioreactor operations by distributing infiltrating water across the waste surface. The soil layer can subsequently be used as part of the final cover system.

Final Thoughts An interim cover such as a vegetated soil layer may be sufficient to control erosion and gas emissions. The soil layer can subsequently be used as part of the final cover system. If gas emissions through a soil interim cover are excessive and can not be adequately controlled by the gas collection system, the cover system may require a gas collection layer beneath the soil layer or a geomembrane barrier. After bioreactor operation ceases and assuming the toxic constituents in the waste have been degraded or fixated, the primary function of the final cover system would be to prevent the bathtub effect. If the liner system could be made more permeable at his time, the final cover system would only need to serve as an isolation layer.