Investigating the Effect of Different Process Parameters on Defects in A713 Aluminium Alloy Castings Produced by Investment Casting Process Nikhil Yadav 1, Vineet Chak 2, Yashvin Gupta 1, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha 1 Department of mechanical engineering, Government women engg college, Ajmer 1 National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, Ranchi 2 Abstract The Investment castings generally employ wax as the pattern material whereas the present study is concerned with expandable polystyrene as the pattern material. The castings thus prepared are subjected to investigation of the surface roughness and porosity defects. The design of experiments has been done by Taguchi s L 9 orthogonal array. The various process parameters taken under consideration are mould firing temperature, pouring temperature, firing time and mixing of silica sand of different grain fineness numbers. The deductions made from readings rendered the variations in the trend of the aforesaid defects through it was concluded that roughness decreases with the increase in the preheating temperature and grain fineness number respectively. It increases with the increase in the pouring temperature of the molten alloy. It further shows a decreasing and increasing trend with the increase in the firing time. Porosity increases with the increase in the grain fineness number, preheating temperature, firing time and the pouring temperature of the molten alloy. Keywords: Investment casting, Expandable polystyrene pattern, Plaster of Paris, Porosity, surface roughness 1. INTRODUCTION Investment casting is categorized under precision castings known for its good surface finish and optimized mechanical properties. The investment casting uses expandable pattern which could be preferably wax [1]. The principle can be traced back to 5000 BC [2]. Known for producing the intricate details and high dimensional accuracy the investment castings are categorized under precision castings. Investment casting produces dimensionally accurate components and is a reliable alternative to other manufacturing processes since waste material is kept to a minimum [3]. Jones and Marquis [2] inferred that the coating materials for ceramic shell investment casting moulds can be categorized under three major categories: binders and catalyst, refractory fillers and additives with its specific characteristics. The binders can be further classified as alcohol based and water based. The example of former one is ethyl silicate having relatively short life and has to be departed by time. Colloidal silica, an aqueous suspension of amorphous silica is most commonly used water based binder. McGuire [3] deduced that fused silica, having an extremely low coefficient of thermal expansion and can be used to produce a dimensionally stable ceramic mold. Fused silica having a considerable thermal shock resistance and in spite of being dimensionally stable can be easily removed after casting in the knockout and cleanup operations. Cui and Yang [4] inferred that great attention is to be paid to the surface finish and hence to the nature of the ceramic filler. Jones et al. [5] concluded that if the refractory coating slurry is not allowed to drain uniformly, the pattern assembly may have irregular thickness which may affect its strength. Jones and Yuan [6] found the strength of a ceramic shell mould is a function of factors as mould material, shell build-up procedure, and firing procedure. Yuan et al. [7] explains that although the polymer modified system exhibits a higher strength in the green dry stage, in practice, moulds produced with fiber additions are less susceptible to autoclave cracking. Barnett [8] found that refractory provides refractory protection to ensure no metal penetration and smooth surface of shell mould. The investment casting process been particularly successful for the production of single crystal turbine blades [8,9,10]. Where on one hand the aforesaid advantages are obtained, there on the other hand it also hampers the casting process in terms of time required for the 929 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha
preparation of mold as well as requirement of skilled labor. Li et al. [11] explained the influence of shell preheat temperature, pouring temperature and melt hydrogen content on the micro porosity and mechanical properties of the cast patterns. They concluded that the shell preheats temperature and the hydrogen content is the important process variables determining the amount of micro porosity in the investment casting. The porosity is increased by increasing the shell preheat temperature and hydrogen content. The low pouring temperature generally produces high mechanical properties. Baumeister et al. [12] investigated the effects of various casting parameters on the micro structures and the mechanical properties of extremely small parts produced by micro castings. He concluded that for the specimen edges become sharper with increasing mold temperature. High mold temperature also results in the transfer of extremely fine details such as cracks and other surface defects from the mould on to the cast part. At a moderate these undesirable fine details are not critical thus making this temperature optimum for casting. The present work introduces expandable polystyrene as the pattern material. The inspiration of using polystyrene is taken from evaporative pattern casting methods using it as a pattern material [13]. Shell preheats temperature, pouring temperature and melt hydrogen content are the important process variables influencing the surface finish and porosity of the cast patterns [14]. The mould conditions like grain fineness numbers and the pouring temperature of the molten alloy also affect the casting properties to a great extent [15]. In the present work involves acetone to dissolve the polystyrene pattern. The design of experiment suggested nine castings to be prepared by taking Al- Zinc alloy (A713 alloy). The effect of different parameters like pouring temperature of the metal alloy, firing temperature, firing time and silica sand of different grain fineness numbers have been studied at three different levels. The effects of the subsequent process parameters on the surface roughness and porosity defects have been studied by using Taguchi method of design of experiments. 2. Experimentation and material selection This section comprises of material selection for the mould and the aluminum alloy casted by the process. Shell preheats temperature, pouring temperature and melt hydrogen content are the important process variables influencing the surface finish and porosity of the cast patterns [14]. Plaster of Paris has been used as the ceramic coating material to be coated over the polystyrene pattern which latter solidifies to form the hard shell. The slurry material has got low or negligible permeability and also is a bad conductor of heat. In the present work 40 percent of silica sand by weight has been mixed to the 60 percent plaster of Paris by weight so as to increase its permeability. The silica sand of different mesh numbers like AFS No.45, AFS No. 60 and AFS No.100 has been taken in the present work. Expandable polystyrene is adopted as the pattern material. Unlike lost foam process the process involves the loss of foam by dissolving in acetone and hence leaving behind a cavity to be filled by the molten alloy. In the present work, A713 aluminum alloy has been taken to prepare the castings. A713 alloy comprises copper (0.1-1.0%), magnesium (0.2-0.5%), zinc (7.0-8.0%) and aluminum as the balance [15]. It is a high strength and low weight alloy used in aerospace engineering application. Owing to their good corrosion properties, high specific strength and low costs for shape forming, cast aluminum alloys are used in engineering applications, such as engines for vehicles, helicopters and fan hubs, etc. Due to its above features it could also be used in making engine blocks and other automotive parts [16]. 2.1 Experimental process The pattern was divided to two parts along the parting line and slurry layer was coated over it. The acetone was used to dissolve the polystyrene pattern from the two halves and thus form the mould cavity followed by subsequent application of coating of three layers of slurry system over it. Now the molten metal was poured to form the final castings after the moulds were combined and dried enough by firing. 2.2 Experimental design Selection of orthogonal array Taguchi recommends Orthogonal Array (OA) for designing the experiments. OA s are generalized Graeco-Latin squares. To design an experiment is to select the most suitable OA and to assign the 930 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha
parameters and interactions of interest to the appropriate columns [16]. Four process parameters have been selected as potentially important in affecting the hardness of the casting. The selected process parameters and their values at different levels are given in Table 1. Table 1: Levels of process parameters Process parameters Level 1 Level 2 The selection of a particular orthogonal array is based on the number of levels of various factors. Here, to conduct the experiments 3 factors each at 3 levels were selected. Now the Degree of Freedom (DOF) can be calculated by the formula as given below [16]. (DOF) R = P*(L 1) (DOF) R = degree s of freedom P = number of factors L = number of levels (DOF) R = 4(3 1) = 8 However, total DOF of the orthogonal array (OA) should be greater than or equal to the total DOF required for the experiment. Thus L 9 orthogonal array was selected to make the further experiments which are shown in Table 2 [16]. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research Level 3 Silica sand AFS No.(A) 45 60 100 Preheat temperature (B) 200 0 C 250 0 C 300 0 C Pouring temperature(c) 750 0 C 700 0 C 670 0 C Firing time (D) 3 hrs 6 hrs 9 hrs Table 2: L9 Orthogonal array 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The effect of various process parameters taken on surface roughness and porosity of A713 aluminum alloy castings has been discussed in this section. The experiments were conducted using the L 9 orthogonal array [15]. The L 9 OA with 3 factors, 3 levels and its responses are shown in the Table 3. Table 3: Experimental data Exp.No. A B C D Roughness Porosity (%) (µm) 1 45 200 750 3 6.36 2.4 2 45 250 700 6 4.47 2.6 3 45 300 670 9 4.22 3.2 4 60 200 700 9 6.36 3.2 5 60 250 670 3 5.05 2.9 6 60 300 750 6 2.82 3.7 7 100 200 670 6 1.30 3.1 8 100 250 750 9 2.56 3.8 9 100 300 700 3 1.07 3.9 3.1 Effect of process parameters on roughness of castings The mean value of roughness obtained at each level of the respective process parameters have been shown in Table 4. Table 4: Average value [Response: Roughness] P L1 L2 L3 A 5.01 4.74 1.54 B 4.67 4.02 2.70 C 3.91 3.96 3.52 D 4.16 2.86 7.90 Fig. 1-4 show the variation of roughness with Expt. A B C D change in the levels of grain fineness number No. (process parameter A ), mould preheating 1 1 1 1 1 temperature (process parameter B ), pouring 2 1 2 2 2 temperature (process parameter C ) and preheating 3 1 3 3 3 time (process parameter D ) respectively. From 4 2 1 2 3 these graphs it can be observed that roughness of the castings varies significantly with the change in 5 2 2 3 1 the levels of the respective process parameters. The 6 2 3 1 2 variations in the trend of the aforesaid property 7 3 1 3 2 were observed and it was deduced out that 8 3 2 1 3 roughness decreases with the increase in the 9 3 3 2 1 931 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha
preheating temperature and grain fineness number respectively. It increases with the increase in the pouring temperature of the molten alloy. It further shows a decreasing and increasing trend with the increase in the firing time. Roughness decreases with the increase in the grain fineness number and preheating temperature of the mould. This may be attributed to the reason that large amount of fines are available with a sand of high AFS number. These fines settle during coating and shell building, resulting in reduced voids at the shell mold surface layers. Due to the reduced voids in the sand mixtures, there is reduction in the radiative heat transfer coefficient. Thus the solidification rate reduces which gives a fine surface finish. Fig. 3 shows an increasing trend of surface roughness with the increase in the pouring temperature of the molten alloy which may be due to the fact that with the increase in the temperature of the molten alloy, it s fusion capability with the mould increases and hence hampering the surface finish of the casting. With the increase in the firing time, the surface roughness decreases with the decrease in the radiative heat transfer rate but further increases which may be due to deterioration of the interior surface of the mould and hence indirectly affecting the surface finish of the casting. 932 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha
3.2 Effect of process parameters on porosity of castings The mean value of roughness obtained at each level of the respective process parameters have been shown in Table 5. Table 5: Average values [Response: Porosity] P L1 L2 L3 A 2.73 3.26 3.60 B 2.90 3.10 3.60 C 3.30 3.23 3.06 D 3.06 3.13 3.40 Fig.5 to 8 show the variation of porosity with change in the levels of grain fineness number (process parameter A ), mould preheating temperature (process parameter B ), pouring temperature (process parameter C ) and preheating time (process parameter D ) respectively. The graphs reveal the considerable variation in the porosity of the castings with the change in the levels of the respective process parameters. Porosity increases with the increase in the grain fineness number, preheating temperature, firing time and the pouring temperature of the molten alloy. Fig.5 to 8 illustrates the increase of porosity due to increase in the levels of the respective process parameters. The permeability of the ceramic shell mould has an important influence on the mould filling. Decrease in the total permeability and increase of excessive strength in the shell is observed due to increase in the grain fineness number which further results in increase in the porosity of the final castings. At the same time, solubility of hydrogen gas in the liquid metal increases at the higher pouring temperature of the liquid metal. The dissolved hydrogen gas comes out of the molten metal during solidification due to its lower solubility at lower temperatures. Hydrogen content in the melt increases the porosity. Part of the gases may get entrapped which leads to increases porosity in the castings. 933 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha
4. CONCLUSIONS A) Roughness decreases with the increase in the grain fineness number and preheating temperature of the mould which might be due to the large amount of fines are available with a sand of high AFS number. B) Surface roughness shows an increasing trend with the increase in the pouring temperature of the molten alloy which may be due to the fact that with the increase in the temperature of the molten alloy, it s fusion capability with the mould increases and hence hampering the surface finish of the casting. C) With the increase in the firing time, the surface roughness decreases with the decrease in the radiative heat transfer rate but further increases which may be due to deterioration of the interior surface of the mould and hence indirectly affecting the surface finish of the casting. D) Porosity increases with the increase in the grain fineness number, preheating temperature, firing time and the pouring temperature of the molten alloy due to the entrapment of the gases produced owing to the higher temperature of mould and molten alloy. 5. REFERENCES [1]. P.R. Beeley and R.F. Smart (1995), Investment Casting, 1 st ed. Institute of Materials. [2]. S. Jones and P.M. Marquis (2001), Role of silica binder in investment casting, British Ceramics Transactions, Vol. 2, p 94. [3]. S. McGuire and Daniel (2005), Investment casting slurry composition and method of use, United States Patent 0092495 May 5. [4]. Y.Y. Cui and R. Yang (2001), Influence of powder size matching on the surface quality of ceramic mould shell for investment casting of titanium alloys, International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, Vol. 2, pp 793-798. [5]. S. Jones, M.R. Jolly and K. Lewis (2002), Development of techniques for predicting ceramic shell properties for investment casting, British Ceramic Transaction, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp 106 113. [6]. S. Jones and C. Yuan (2003), Advances in shell moulding for investment casting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 135, pp 258 265. [7]. C. Yuan and S. Jones (2003), Investigation of fiber modified ceramic moulds for investment casting Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 23, pp 399 407. [8]. Stephen Barnett (2004), Defect s associated with primary coat, Foundry Trade Journal, Vol. 178, p 321. [9]. P.R. Taylor, An illustrated history of lost wax casting, Proceedings of the 17 th Annual BICTA Conference, Washington, D.C., September (1983). [10]. P. Aubertin, S. Cockfrot, J. Fernihough, Metallurgical aspects of castings of single-crystal airfoils for use in aero-engines and industrial gas turbines, Proceedings of the 10 th World Conference on Investment Casting, Monte Carlo, 2000. [11]. Y. M. Li and R. D. Li (2001), Effec t of Casting Process variables on micro porosity and mechanical properties in an investment cast aluminum alloy, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, Vol. 2, pp 277-280. [12]. Gundi Baumeister, Brando Okolo, Joachim Rogner (2008), Micro casting of Al bronze: Influence of casting parameters on the microstructures and the mechanical properties. Microsystems Technology, Vol. 14, pp 1647-1655. [13]. Pradeep Kumar, Sudhir Kumar, H.S. Shan (2009), Characterization of the refractory coating material used in vacuum assisted evaporative pattern casting, Journal of Material Processing Technology Vol. 209, pp 2699-2706. [14]. Jianhui Xu, Yuanbin Zhang, Tongguang Zhai (2010), Distribution of Pore size and fatigue weak link strength in an A713 sand cast aluminum alloy, Journal of Material science and Engineering Vol. 527, pp 3639-3644. [15]. Pradeep Kumar, Sudhir Kumar, H.S. Shan (2008), Optimization of Tensile properties of evaporative pattern casting Process using Taguchi s method, Journal of Material Process Technology Vol. 204, pp 59-69. [16]. Nikhil Yadav, DB Karunakar (2011), Effect of Process parameters on mechanical properties of the Investment castings produced by using Expandable Polystyrene Pattern, International Journal of advances in engineering and Technology Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp 128-137 934 Nikhil Yadav, Vineet Chak, Yashvin Gupta, Dharmanshu Singh Sodha