The Benefits of High Reactivity Hydrated Lime for Air Pollution Control. April 9, 2015 Curt Biehn

Similar documents
Worldwide Pollution Control Association

W P C A. Worldwide Pollution Control Association. WPCA-Duke Energy FF/HAPS Seminar October 12-13, Visit our website at

DRY SORBENT INJECTION WITH HYDRATED LIME FOR ACID GAS CONTROL TO ACHIEVE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Acid Gas Removal with Trona Focus on HCl Reduction. Jarret McClendon -Applications Engineer Josh Allen Applications Engineer

Dry Sorbent Injection and Modeling for Acid Gas Emissions Control. Lew Benson McIlvaine Hot Topic Hour June 7, 2012

Integrating ADAir Mixer Technology to Optimize System Performance with DSI Applications

Fuel Quality and MATS for Coal- Fired Plants: The Ripple Effect

HCl Reduction with Trona for MATS Compliance

EMO August 1, Bobby I.T. Chen Client Program Manager

MEGA Dynamic Control of DSI for SO3 Management ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

NeuStream -DR: Improving the effectiveness of DSI while substantially reducing the chemical cost

Mercury Measurement and Control

Control Technology Options for Boiler MACT and CISWI Compliance

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

Sodium Bicarbonate DSI at Kincaid Generating Station

SORBACAL SPS - CHANGING PERCEPTIONS ON HYDRATED LIME FOR SO 2 REMOVAL AND ESP IMPACTS

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

Dry Sorbent Injection and Gas Co-Fire / FLGR for Small to Medium Plants

The choice for innovative flue gas treatment. Sorbacal SPS, the most effective calcium sorbent on the market

Reducing the Cost of Compliance and Improving Plant Operations for Coal-Fired Boilers

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

Mercury Control in the Boiler

The Growth of Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) and the impact on Coal Combustion Residue

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial Coal-Fired Boilers

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Reducing Operating Costs and Risks of Hg Control with Novel Fuel Additives

Accelerating Mercury Control

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

The Value Proposition of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology. Robert Giglio Foster Wheeler Global Power Group

Air Pollution Compliance Strategies for Coal Generation

EPA Regulation: Utility MACT Proposal

A Better Alternative to SO 3 for conditioning Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP)

Mercury Capture in Conventional APC Technologies

REINHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL Ltd NOx-Combustion-CCR Round Table Presentation. February 1 & 2, 2016, in Orlando, FL / Hosted by OUC

A Fixed Structure Approach to Mercury Control for Coal Fired Power Plants

Fluid Bed Scrubbing TECHNOLOGY

Beneficiation of High Sodium Fly Ash

Longview Power- An Advanced Supercritical Coal Plant

Dry Sorbent Injection - Sodium

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Field Test Program to Evaluate Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Facilities with SCR-FGD Systems

Pre-SCR Injection Of Sodium Sorbents

Evaluation of Mercury Control Strategies in the Presence of SO 3 Using the MerSim TM Model. Brydger Van Otten, Bradley Adams

Mercury Measure and Capture: PAC Injection in the WFGD. Michelle Brown, PE & Dr. Christine Valcarce McIIvaine Company Hot Topic Hour March 5, 2015

Demonstrations of Amended Silicates for Mercury Control in Coal Fired Generating Units

Updates on the Performance of Selected Circulation Dry Scrubbers Shiaw Tseng McIlvaine Company Webinar

ABSTRACT. Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), which are particulate collectors, are now used as part

Multimedia Impacts of Halogen Injection for Mercury Control in Coal- Fired Boilers

Optimizing Absorber STEP 2 - FGDplus Working principle for DeSOx

TECHNOLOGIES for SO 2 and ACID GAS CONTROL

POWER PLANT AIR QUALITY CONTROL and FLY ASH QUALITY & AVAILABILITY

PM Compliance Options for MACT and MATS Rules. Ed McCall PCME

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

The Future of Coal Ash

Research & Development Needs for the Clean Coal Plant of the Future

OPERATING EXPERIENCE OF CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED SCRUBBING TECHNOLOGY IN UTILITY SIZE POWER PLANTS AND REFINERIES

Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)

Coal Fired Boiler Optimization and the Impact on Emission Control Devices

Particulate and Opacity Control - Program 76

Acid Gas Control Systems. Spray-Dry Scrubbers and Dry Injection Systems. United McGill products. a McGill AirClean product

Advanced AQCS for Oxy-fuel Combustion System; Controlling Mercury & SO3

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Mercury Measurements and Control

TruePeak TDLS200. NH 3 Slip Measurement. <Document Number> Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation <date/time>

MerSim TM Mercury Model. Abstract. Introduction. Mercury Control Strategies

ESP and Fabric Filter Considerations for Meeting Environmental Regulations: IED, LCP and WI BREF

Ray Chalmers - EPA Region III

Performance and Benefits of Flue Gas Treatment Using Thiosorbic Lime

Industrial Boiler MACT Rule Impact and Control Options for Mercury and Dioxins/Furans

Cross-effects and total gas clean-up system lay-out

Verification of Microfine Lime Theoretical Model for SO 2 Removal in Precalciner Cement Plants

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

Commercial Experience with Concrete-Friendly Mercury Sorbents

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Local Impacts of Mercury from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Up gradation of Boilers to Implement New Pollution Norms

Multi-pollutant Emission Reduction Technology for Small Utility Boilers Nalco Mobotec

Controlling Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Advances in Mercury Control Technology for Industrial Sources. July 9, 2008

Fly Ash Supply and Quality. NCC RENO meeting, 4/20/ 2015

Regulatory Factors Effecting Fly Ash Supply.

2014 Conference- Washington DC October 29, Ashworth Gasifier - Combustor Multi-Pollutant Control for Power Plants

Energy Production Systems Engineering

Assessment of Bias in Measurement of Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants Comparison of Electronic CEMS and Sorbent Traps

FINAL DETERMINATION. To Grant a. Temporary Permit/Non-Attainment New Source Review Permit. For. Concord Steam Corporation.

THE CLEAN COMBUSTION SYSTEM Burns Coal as Clean as Natural Gas

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

MERCURY CONTROL WITH FABRIC FILTERS FROM COAL-FIRED BOILERS

Successful SO3 Mitigation While Enhancing the ESP Performance at AEP s Gavin Plant by Dry Injection of Trona Upstream of the ESP

COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS: OPPORTUNITIES FOR BETTER POLLUTANT CONTROL

Application of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology for Multi Pollutant Removal

September 20, Water Docket U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 4203M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

IMMOBILIZATION OF TOXIC HEAVY METALS IN MSW RESIDUE ASH

Availability of Mercury Control Technology

Catalytic Filter for Dioxin Control - Experience and Case Studies Zhengtian Xu W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Sheila Glesmann / December 5, 2016 / SVP, ADA Carbon Solutions, LLC

Environmental Compliance and Impacts. June 2011

Transcription:

The Benefits of High Reactivity Hydrated Lime for Air Pollution Control April 9, 2015 Curt Biehn

Improve Hydrated Lime Performance Allow higher SO 3 / HCl removal rates Meet tighter sulfuric acid mist requirements Meet HCl MATS for Utility and Industrial boilers Better in-flight capture of SO 3 / HCl Attain benefits of hot side injection of hydrate APH cleanliness Residence time improvement Help meet Hg MATS by removing more SO 3 in-flight High Reactivity Hydrated Lime 2

What is High Reactivity Hydrated Lime? New product from Mississippi Lime aimed at Dry Sorbent Injection industry for SO 3 and HCl mitigation Extensive site testing shows 25-50% benefit over FGT-grade hydrated lime Aimed at improved in-flight pollutant capture Fast reactivity Comparison of HRH and FGT Hydrate Performance DSI System for SO 3 Supporting papers and presentations available Full scale availability began in December 2013 3

Regulatory Benefits of HRH 4 Tighter regulations on Sulfuric Acid Mist Need for in-flight capture of SO 3 to improve activated carbon utilization High removal rate of HCl for MATS 4

Sulfuric acid mist lbs/mm Btu HRH Allows a Plant to Meet SAM Requirements HRH DSI-GradeHydrate Large Plant Med Sulfur Coal SAM Level max lbs/hr Hydrate 5

In conjunction with Activated Carbon Full scale test in advance of 2015 MATS Using FGT grade hydrate Unit unable to meet mercury reduction limits regardless of amount of hydrate and carbon fed Using HR hydrate Unit easily able to meet mercury reduction targets 6

HR Hydrated Lime HCl Mitigation Hydrated lime is most economical option for HCl mitigation to meet MATS requirements. Examples from Testing Programs Coal type Particulate Collection HCl reduction Hydrate: Total Acid NSR Comment Western/PRB BH >95% ~ 0.80 Easily achieved MATS App. Coal BH >99% 3.0 4.0 Easily met MATS Also 40-50% SO 2 reduction Western/PRB ESP >80% ~ 0.50 Easily achieved MATS Waste BH >97% 0.7 1.2 MATS achieved High Cl ESP 90% ~ 0.7 MATS achieved Very marginal ESP with < 1.5 sec residence time Western/PRB Marg ESP >95% ~ 0.80 Challenging system, also targeting Hg reduction with AS 7

Cost Benefits of HRH 8 Use less hydrate = reduced freight costs Freight typically 25-30% of delivered cost Example: 10,000 tpy with FGT 30% HRH benefit -> 7,000 tpy HRH»125 fewer shipments per year with HRH»Freight savings offset product price premium»utility recognizes cost savings 8

SO 3 Removal from inlet Full Scale Evaluation SO 3 Removal - HR vs. FGT 100% 90% 80% HR Hydrate 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% FGT ~30% less hydrate with HR 20% 10% Full scale application High Load conditions 0% 0 1 2 lbs hydrate/lbs SO 3 4 5 3 FGT hydrate gives good removal HR Hydrate offers better utilization or high level removal capabilities 9

HCl lbs/mm Btu Meeting 2015 Utility MATS Limits for HCl 0.0025 0.0020 FGT - HCl lbs/mm Btu HR - HCl lbs/mm Btu (smaller unit < 300 MW, IBC) MATS Limit 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005 0.0000 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 Feed Rate lbs/hr 10

Evaluation of HRH in CDS Overall, HRH provides significant improvement vs FGT Most benefit at mid and low load conditions High load Mid load Low load Overall Full scale test on existing Circ Dry Scrubber Identical length test periods Averaged data at respective load groupings 11

12 Operational Benefits Pre-Air Preheater injection of hydrated lime Maintain APH cleanliness while controlling SO 3 emissions More efficient SO 3 removal reduces ABS formation and deposition in APH Simple systems Mills not required Dilution system or complex lances not required 12

SO 3 ppm SO 3 Reduction at APH Inlet 100 SO 3 ppm at APH inlet Hydrate Injected at SCR Outlet FGT HRH 80 60 HRH offers significantly improved in-flight capture of SO 3 in short residence time 40 20 0 A B C Increasing Hydrated Lime feed rate 13

Ash Benefits 14 More efficient sorbent = less ash Example: 10,000 tpy with FGT 30% HRH benefit -> 7,000 tpy HRH Ash disposal = 3,000 tpy * $20/ton disp = $60,000/year savings Lower feed rates with HRH reduce particulate loading on ESP Benefits of calcium in ash Hydrated lime-based ash leaches the least toxic metals of Se, As, V, and Mo Calcium stabilizes heavy metals in ash Calcium precipitation critical in minimizing As/Se leaching 14

Summary 15 HR Hydrate offers many potential benefits to customers: Regulatory Cost improvement Operational benefits Ash reduction and quality 15

Questions Curt Biehn Director of Marketing & Technical Services crbiehn@mississippilime.com 314.543.6309 Mississippi Lime Company 3870 S. Lindbergh Blvd. Suite 200 St. Louis, MO 63127 www.mississippilime.com 16