Quality metrics; dg, d50, Fi, So,

Similar documents
Flow-ecology relationships. Flow-ecology relationships Susitna case study

Fish and Aquatics Instream Flow

Study 7.5 Groundwater

General Instream Flow Methods Overview. Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24, 2011

Formal ILP Proposed Study Plan Review

Case Study HEC-RAS Model Utilization for Fish Habitat Assessment Studies

Ongoing and Completed Studies

Stevens Creek Steelhead Limiting Factors Analysis. Stillwater Sciences

Environmental Flows Allocation Process in Texas. Kevin Mayes Texas Parks and Wildlife Department March 2010

Bridge-Seton Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. BRGMON-9 Seton River Habitat and Fish Monitoring

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No )

RESPONSE TO FEBRUARY 16, 2018 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, RESOURCE AGENCY LATE FILING, AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION ATTACHMENT T

Standard Operating Procedure for Critical Riffle Analysis for Fish Passage in California

MEMORANDUM. Jason Sweet, BPA. From: Michele DeHart. Date: November 30, Response to comments on the Draft CSS 2015 Annual Report

Bonsall Creek Watershed Management Plan Gap Analysis

The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology

Appendix I: Fixed-400,000 af Flood Storage Operation

Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Modeling Strategy

9.11. Study of Fish Passage Feasibility at Watana Dam

Ecological Flow Assessments in Eastern U.S. Basins Tara Moberg. December 10, 2014 NAS Roundtable on Science and Technology for Sustainability

The Shiraz model A tool for incorporating anthropogenic effects and fish habitat relationships in conservation planning

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Groundwater Study Study Plan Section Study Implementation Report.

Identification of Restoration Alternatives in North Fork of Lewis River. P. Roni and R. Timm

Lagunitas Creek Stewardship Plan Marin Municipal Water District Final June 2011 TABLES

5. PRELIMINARY ISSUES AND STUDIES LIST Development of Preliminary Issues and Studies

CNL(10)51. NASCO Guidelines for the Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Atlantic salmon Habitat

Comparative Survival Study models, model inputs model outputs

Appendix D. Hydraulic and Habitat Suitability Analyses Technical Memorandum

Altered Flood Control, Climate Change, and Rebuilding Pacific Northwest Salmon Stocks

Fish Passage Culvert Inspection (FPCI)

Rascal Goose. Reach 1. Rascal Goose. Reach 2. å å å. Main Goose Pit. Stream Reach 3. Main Goose Pit. Stream Reach 7

Ecohydraulic Design of Salmonid Habitat Enhancement Projects in the Central Valley, California

GUIDE TO THE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WATERCOURSE CROSSINGS, INCLUDING GUIDELINES FOR COMPLYING WITH THE CODE OF PRACTICE

Comments from 4/12 - Draft Responses

Effects of habitat degradation on salmon and trout populations: Logging practices as a case study in the complexity of salmonid life cycles

JHI Sweetheart Lake: Spawning Habitat Assessment & Maintenance

Sand Accumulation in Spawning Gravels

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2014 ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN ROGUE WATERSHED DISTRICT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Monitoring Program Terms of Reference

Biologically Sound Stream Crossings

Spring-Run Chinook Salmon

JUVENILE SALMON MIGRATION SECTION 5. blank page

1:24K Fish Habitat Distribution Development Project. Data Format Outlines and Data Compilation Protocols

Overview of the Instream Flow/Fish Habitat Element of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project. By Jeremy Freimund, P.H.

Final Report AN APPROACH FOR DETERMINATION OF INSTREAM FLOW NEEDS FOR PALLID STURGEON AND OTHER KEY FISH SPECIES IN THE LOWER YELLOWSTONE RIVER

Lower Columbia River Ecosystem Restoration Program. Catherine Corbett, Chief Scientist Science to Policy Summit May 10, 2013

Coquitlam-Buntzen Water Use Plan

Chehalis Basin Strategy Programmatic SEPA Draft EIS

Columbia River Project Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference KINBASKET RESERVOIR FISH AND WILDLIFE INFORMATION PLAN

LIST OF TECHNICAL APPENDICES

Columbia River Project Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference KINBASKET RESERVOIR FISH AND WILDLIFE INFORMATION PLAN

Ripple: A Digital-Terrain Based Model for Defining Limiting Factors on Salmon Populations in Upland Watersheds

Understanding and Restoring Natural Floodplain Function. Gary James CTUIR Fisheries Program Manager

United States Department of the Interior

Ton Snelder, Maurice Duncan, Marty Bonnett

Ecology and River Restoration

RIPPLE Case Study Rock Creek Oregon Coho Enhancement

Request for Proposal (RFP) Lower Kings River Fishery Habitat Characterization and Identification of Restoration Opportunities.

San Joaquin River Restoration Program Restoration Administrator

Oregon Administrative Rules Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

What Is Salmonid Habitat Intrinsic Potential (IP) Modeling

Restoration of Riparian Forests and Riparian Ecosystem Processes and Implications for Salmon Restoration. Katie Ross-Smith Jennifer Hammond

Eska Creek Preliminary Feasibility Analysis

Western Strait Drainages. Watershed Summaries DRAINAGES EST WRIA 19 EST

Scenario Modeling and Restoration Implications

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR 2015 ROGUE RIVER SPRING CHINOOK SALMON CONSERVATION PLAN ROGUE WATERSHED DISTRICT OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Lower Tuolumne River Instream Flow Study Evaluation of Effective Usable Habitat Area for over-summering O. mykiss

EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON SALMONID MIGRATION ASSOCIATED WITH CIRCULATION OF SALINE POND WATER DURING THE INITIAL STEWARDSHIP PERIOD

ROGUE BASIN PROJECT CONSERVATION RELEASE SEASON OPERATING PLAN WATER YEAR 2018

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Open Water HEC-RAS Flow Routing Model. Prepared for. Alaska Energy Authority.

Duncan Dam Project Water Use Plan Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. DDMMON-16 Lower Duncan River Fish Stranding Impact Monitoring

SIDE CHANNEL / OFF CHANNEL HABITAT RESTORATION

CHAPTER 3 Environmental Guidelines for WATERCOURSE CROSSINGS GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND LABOUR

The Vertical Dimension of Lotic Systems

Models Quantify the Relationship Between Water Flows/Levels and Ecological Endpoints

P.O. 11POSOW0482. HSW

Lower Yuba River Accord Monitoring and Evaluation Program Interim Report

Incorporating Climate Change Impacts into Water Resources Planning

Dungeness River Aquifer Recharge Habitat Technical Memorandum

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SALMON RESTORATION: A BROADER PERSPECTIVE

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Turbidity Changes During Culvert to Bridge Upgrades at Carmen Creek, Idaho

Effects of habitat degradation on salmon and trout populations: Logging practices as a case study in the complexity of salmonid life cycles

Science & Technology Needs for Hydropower

Cheakamus Project Water Use Plan

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion

Why did the fish cross the Road?

Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Study & Climate Adaptation Options

Estimation of rearing habitat requirements of San Joaquin River Chinook salmon using the Emigrating Salmonid Habitat Estimation (ESHE) Model

GRAYS HARBOR ESTUARY MANAGEMENT UNIT GRAYS HARBOR ESTUARY

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

River Clyde Environmental Flow Assessment. Summary Report to DPIWE, Water Management Branch

1/30/2014. SR-BOK Outcomes. Sue Niezgoda, Gonzaga University January 28, Depth. Breadth

Railbelt Large Hydro Evaluation

Ecological Considerations in Setting MFLs and Lake Regulation Targets for the Ocklawaha Chain of Lakes

Salinas Valley Water Project Flow Prescription for Steelhead Trout in the Salinas River

Coquitlam-Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

Kachess River Action #1: Upper Kachess River Habitat and Passage Projects

Information for EFSAB:

Transcription:

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning Spawning Spawning 1 How will long term operations affect the quality and quantity of spawning habitats in lateral habitats? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Quality metrics; dg, d50, Fi, So, dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, others); and Quantity metrics - computed spawning habitat-flow relationships and other metrics at FAs (2-D model); composited values (combined values) for different species (e.g. ranges, medians, percentiles, time series) of habitat amounts provided by flows during respective spawning periods. Pre-Post operations comparisons at selected time steps. 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* relevant to spawning habitats (Geomodels); 2D habitat spatial analyses linked to HSC/HSI functions; re-run habitat models with bed elevation changes (Fish-2D model; HSC-models; HSI-models). Changes to groundwater flow with project operations (GW-analysis). Changes to water quality (e.g. DO, water temperature) (WQ-models - input to HSI-models). fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). Spawning 2 How will long term operations affect the quality and quantity of spawning habitats in the main channel? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Quality metrics; dg, d50, Fi, So, Pre-Post operations comparisons at dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, selected time steps. others); and Quantity metrics - computed spawning habitat-flow relationships and other metrics at selected cross-sections in main channel areas in FAs (2-D model) and supplemental flow metrics at selected crosssections (1-D model); composited values (combined values) for different species (e.g. ranges, medians, percentiles, time series) of habitat amounts provided by flows during respective spawning periods. 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* relevant to spawning habitats (Geomodels); 2-D habitat spatial analyses linked to HSC/HSI functions; re-run habitat models with bed elevation changes (Fish-2D model; HSC - models; HSI - models). Changes to groundwater flow with project operations (GW-analysis). Changes to water quality (e.g. DO, water temperature) (WQ-models - input to HSI-models). fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50) 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 1 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning 3 How does main channel spawning habitat change with flow? Computed spawning habitat-flow Pre-Post operations comparisons of main relationships in main channel areas in FAs (2-channel spawning habitat metrics D model); composited values (combined values) for different species (e.g. ranges, medians, percentiles, time series) of habitat amounts provided by flows during respective spawning periods for Wet, Dry, Ave. years; totaled by Geomorphic Reach; other supplemental flow-habitat metrics at selected cross-sections (1-D model); Hydraulic (OWFR-model) and 1-D and 2-D morphology models (Geo-models) linked with Habitat Models (Fish 2-D and 1-Dmodels); habitat models incorporate HSC and HSI functions (HSC and HSI-models). Post-operations results rely on 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* to adjust bed topographies. fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). Spawning 4 What main channel habitats provide the greatest amounts of spawning areas? Spatial (longitudinal) representation of main channel spawning habitat amounts by species (graphic and tabular displays) available during spawning period for different hydrology; e.g. Ave, Wet. Dry year types; 20%, 50%, 80% exceedence values). Pre-Post operations comparisons of main channel spawning habitat distributions and amounts. Post-processing of hydraulic (OWFR-model) and habitat model (Fish-2D and 1D-models) runs to derive spatial representation statistics. Post-operations results rely on 1- D and 2-D morphology model outputs* to adjust bed topographies (Geo-models). fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50) 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 2 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning 5 How do tributary clear-water plumes that are used for spawning change with main channel flow? Computed spawning habitat-flow response functions (habitat based (D,V, S,) that includes turbidity/clear water area) specific to Tributary Mouths; metric is area (Ft2) of clearwater spawning habitat computed for different flow. Pre-Post operations comparisons of how clearwater plumes and spawning areas in Tributary Mouths may change. Hydraulic models (2-D) linked with Habitat Models (Fish - 2D model) that are inclusive of Tributary Mouths; habitat models incorporate HSC and HSI functions (HSC and HSI-models)(include turbidity). Turbidity inputs provided from EFDC (WQ-model). Post-operations results rely on 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* to adjust bed topographies. fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). Spawning 6 How do lateral spawning habitats change with flow? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Computed spawning habitat-flow relationships and other metrics in lateral habitats in FAs (2-D model); composited values (combined values) for different species (e.g. ranges, medians, percentiles, time series) of habitat amounts provided by flows during respective spawning periods for Wet, Dry, Ave. years; totaled by Geomorphic Reach; effective spawning habitat width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different spawning time steps; spawning habitat duration analysis. Pre-Post operations comparisons of lateral spawning habitat metrics. Hydraulic models (2-D) linked with fish habitat models (Fish 2D- models); habitat models incorporate HSC and HSI functions (HSC and HSI - models). Changes to groundwater flow and HSI-models in lateral areas based on (GW-analysis). Spawning 7 Which lateral habitats are most often used for spawning? Metrics from tabular/graphical data comparing spawning habitats (by species) between lateral macrohabitats (by habitat type) and in overall Middle River (spatial evaluation metrics); Determine key lateral habitat types used for spawning. Data on use obtained from fish surveys (spawning, HSC,FDA and 1980s data); quantitative data from Hydraulic models (2- D) linked with Fish habitat models (Fish 2Dmodel); habitat models incorporate HSC and HSI functions. Post-processing of hydraulic (OWFR-model) and habitat model (Fish-2D and 1D-models) runs to derive spatial representation statistics. 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 3 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning 8 What surface flow related physical and hydraulic characteristics influence the selection of spawning habitats? HSC metrics for spawning of D,V,S, Cover Needed for flow-habitat modeling Site specific HSC data and curve development (HSC models), coupled with 1980s data and other HSC sources. Spawning 9 To what extent does groundwater flow influence selection of spawning habitats? HSI metrics (temperature, upwelling/downwelling) linked with spawning habitat flow response relationships; GIS analysis of TIR overlain with spawning habitats - area (ft2). Pre-Post operations effects analysis of spawning habitats. Data from HSI surveys (VHG data; HSI models); groundwater analysis in FAs with spawning activity (GW analysis); TIR imagery overlay with spawning area (GIS). Spawning 10 How do surface flows influence the groundwater flows associated with spawning habitats? Spawning 11 What are the substrate characteristics of areas used for spawning by adult salmon? Groundwater temperature conditions and differences between upland, lateral, and mid-channel habitat; groundwater gradients and recharge area characteristics and presence/absence, seasonal variations in groundwater discharge to lateral habitats. Gravel quality metrics; dg, d50, Fi, So, dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, others) from FAs; Determine surface flow/groundwater relationships that may be influenced by project operations. Pre-Post operations comparisons of substrate composition. Groundwater and surface-water monitoring/modeling. Groundwater and surface-water temperature monitoring, winter observation of ice and snow cover on lateral habitats and connections with mainstem channels (GW-analysis) linked with OWFR-model Bed material gradations from geomorphology studies; pebble counts; substrate characterization from HSC surveys; (HSC and HSI data). Spawning 12 What is the permanency of spawning areas in main channel and lateral habitats during the spawning season? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Effective spawning habitat width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different spawning time steps; spawning habitat duration analysis. Hydraulic and morphology models (Geo 2Dmodel) linked with fish habitat models (Fish 2D-models). Spawning 13 What surface flow related water quality characteristics occur in main-channel spawning habitats? Water quality metrics; DO, temp, nutrients, others; exceedence metrics over spawning periods (e.g. 10%, 50%, 90%) and others. Pre-Post operations comparisons of water quality characteristics in spawning habitats. Coarse EFDC water quality modeling outputs for Temp, DO, ph, conductivity, nutrients and other relevant constituents at X-sections in main channel; empirical data (WQ-models); (empirical water quality data from FDA and HSI surveys). Spawning 14 What surface flow related water quality characteristics occur in lateral habitat spawning areas? Water quality metrics; DO, temp, nutrients, others; exceedence metrics over spawning periods (e.g. 10%,50%,90%) and others. Pre-Post operations comparisons of water quality characteristics in spawning habitats. Detailed EFDC water quality modeling outputs for Temp, DO, ph, conductivity, nutrients and other relevant constituents at X-sections in main channel and FAs (WQmodels); (empirical water quality data from FDA and HSI surveys). 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 4 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning 15 What groundwater flow related water quality characteristics occur in lateral habitat spawning areas? Water quality metrics from groundwater wells, seeps, springs, and surface-water sources recharged by groundwater; DO, temp, nutrients, metals indicators, others; exceedence metrics over spawning periods (e.g. 10%,50%,90%) and others. Determine whether groundwater related water quality characteristics influence surface water quality in spawning areas. Empirical data from groundwater wells; historical and regional data. Winter observations of open leads and other ice and snow cover variations affecting temperature and light conditions in lateral habitats; comparison with empirical surface water quality data and EFDC model output (WQ-models). Spawning 16 Others.. Spawning 17 Spawning 18 1 What are incubation patterns and Temp and DO metrics in different locations conditions in spawning habitats of the river? based on current conditions; literature i.e. egg development times, water quality parameters. based TU requirements to hatch; developed temperature-hatch time response functions; DO - incubation relationships from literature; ADEC water quality criteria; substrate quality metrics - dg, d50, Fi, So, dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, others). Needed for habitat modeling. Output from EFDC modeling for Temperature - WQ (WQ-model); Literature based data on TU requirements including studies from 1980s (Wangaard and Burger 1983; empirical data from HSC, FDA, and Radiotag studies; bed material gradations from geomorphology studies; pebble counts; substrate characterization from HSC surveys; (HSC and HSI data). 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 5 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) 2 How will project operations affect the incubation patterns and conditions in the spawning habitats of the river? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Temp and DO metrics in different locations Pre-Post operations comparisons of based on project operations; literature spawning and incubation habitats. based TU requirements to hatch; cumulative TU analysis and comparisons Pre- Post project; DO metrics Pre-Post; substrate quality metrics (Pre-Post) - dg, d50, Fi, So, dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, others). 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* relevant to spawning-incubation habitats +Geo-models); 2D habitat spatial analyses linked to HSC/HSI functions; re-run habitat models with bed elevation changes (Fish-2D model; HSC - models; HSI - models). Changes to groundwater flow with project operations (GW-analysis). Changes to water quality (e.g. DO, water temperature) (WQ-models - input to HSI-models). Literature based data on TU requirements including studies from 1980s (Wangaard and Burger 1983). fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). 3 What are fry emergence patterns from spawning habitats in the river? Temp metrics in different locations based on current conditions; literature based TU requirements to emergence. Needed for habitat modeling. EFDC WQ model - temperature (WQmodels) Literature based data on TU requirements including studies from 1980s (Wangaard and Burger 1983) and others related to fry emergence; empirical data from HSC, FDA, EarlyLifeHistory (ELH) studies. 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 6 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) 4 How will project operations affect fry emergence patterns from spawning habitats in the river? (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Temp metrics in different locations based on project operations; literature based TU requirements to emergence; cumulative TU analysis ; substrate quality metrics - dg, d50, Fi, So, dominant/subdominant, % fines < 6.4 mm, others). Pre-Post operations comparisons of fry emergence conditions. Output from Temperature - EFDC WQ models; Literature based data on TU requirements including studies from 1980s (Wangaard and Burger date) and others related to fry emergence; 3) empirical data from HSC, FDA, and Radiotag studies; 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* relevant to spawning-incubation-fry emergence habitats (Geo-models); fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). 5 Others.. 6 7 Spawning / Spawning / Overwinter Spawning / Overwinter 1 How do spawning/incubation habitats change in winter? (stage, temperature, DO, light, circulation/flow through sloughs). (EFFECTIVE SPAWNING HABITAT) Water quality metrics (DO, temp, nutrients, metals, others) during ice cover conditions; Groundwater upwelling changes by season and flow rate. Pre-Post winter-time operations comparisons. (Empirical data) from winter studies - continuous DO and temp recorders; River2D Hydraulic model outputs with specified ice cover (WSE, velocity, depth); output from River1D Ice processes model (IceFRM-model) - WSEs, ice thickness linked with fish habitat models (Fish 2Dmodels), groundwater upwelling processes (GW analysis) for ice covered conditions; water quality metrics from EFDC WQmodel. 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 7 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Spawning / Overwinter 2 How would changes in winter flow conditions impact lateral habitat water depth and temperature? Response functions between mainstem Determine how winter project operations stage and lateral habitat and groundwater may influence lateral habitat areas stage conditions; variations in ice cover with compared with natural conditions. depth and velocity in lateral habitats, with varying temperature conditions. Groundwater simulations of hydrologic conditions during winter periods for different operational scenarios (GWanalysis); empirical data from groundwater and surface-water monitoring programs and winter studies. Spawning / Overwinter 3 How would changes in winter flow conditions impact ice formation at inlets/outlets to lateral habitat? Evaluation of field photographic data for Determine how winter project operations different sets of lateral habitat inlets/outlets may influence inlets and outlets to lateral that represent a range of depth habitat areas compared with natural characteristics. conditions. Empirical/observational data from FA and winter studies of inlets/outlets during winter conditions; River2D Hydraulic model outputs with specified ice cover (WSE, velocity, depth); output from River1D Ice processes model (IceFRM-model) - WSEs, ice thickness(2-d)process understanding from Ice Processes and Groundwater Winter GW/SW Interactions (GW analysis). Spawning / Others.. Overwinter Spawning / Overwinter Spawning / Overwinter Adult Migration Adult Migration Adult Migration 1 What are peak adult migration periods of adult salmon within the Susitna River system - by species? Range of migration intervals; 95% CI interval of passage by species; median date of passage; quartiles, etc. Used to define periodicity of adult fish movement; linked with pre-post hydrologic modeling. Empirical data from radiotagging and tracking studies; spawning surveys; RST data; Adult Migration 2 What flows trigger and occur during adult migrations and passage in the mainstem Susitna River Pre vs. Post conditions? Computed hydrologic metrics centered around migration periods (modified IHA or EFC parameters) (e.g. frequency of freshets, mean or median values of Wet, Dry, Ave. flows during migration periods). Pre-Post operations migration comparisons. Hydrologic analysis - IHA/EFC type analysis performed on Pre-versus Post hydrology for migration periods. Adult Migration 3 What flows limit (regulate?) time periods of Computed hydrologic metrics (likely a range adult passage above Devils Canyon? (ADULT of flows; passage response function) PASSAGE THROUGH DEVILS CANYON) Empirical data from radiotagging study; timing/numbers) and pre-post hydrology data (OWFR-model) to derive upstream passage flow windows. 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 8 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Adult Migration 4 What flows limit (regulate?) adult passage into lateral habitats (side sloughs, side channels, tributary mouths)? (ADULT PASSAGE INTO LATERAL HABITATS) Computed hydrologic metrics (site specific low flow statistics that incorporate Q and duration; e.g. Indian River mouth Min.Q Pass (X t-duration ) exceedences) Pre-Post operations comparisons (short term). Barrier Analysis coupled with 2-D hydraulic modeling (at FA level Macrohabitats) or 1-D modeling (at other targeted tributaries) to define flow-based passage constraints, and then complete Pre-versus Post hydrologic analysis of those conditions with OWFRmodel. Adult Migration 5 How will long term operations affect adult passage into lateral habitats(side sloughs, side channels, tributary mouths); i.e. physical characteristics and flow needs? Geomorphology metrics: 1-D modeling at Pre-Post operations comparisons (long lateral habitat associated cross-sections term). aggradation/degradation; bed material composition and mobility; 2-D modeling at FAs sediment balance; aggradation/degradation; bed material composition and mobility; bed-form profiles. 1-D and 2-D morphology model outputs* specific to lateral habitats, linked with Barrier Analysis and OWFR-model. fixed times (years 0, 25 and 50). Adult Migration 6 What flow related water quality conditions occur during adult migration and passage? Water quality metrics (e.g. DO, temp, conductivity, etc.) (ranges, median, averages, exceedences, time series, other) during wet, dry and normal year passage periods. Spatially explicit EFDC water quality modeling outputs for Temp, DO, ph, conductivity (marker for tributary or groundwater influences on the mainstem), nutrients and other relevant constituents at X-sections in main channel; WQ-model. Adult Migration 7 Others.. Adult Migration 8 Adult Migration 9 1 What habitats are used by juvenile fish for rearing during open water flow conditions? 2 What surface flow related physical and hydraulic characteristics influence the selection of rearing habitats? Spatial GIS analysis of locations of juvenile Establish framework for rearing habitat fish; by geomorphic reach, and FAs; HSI and analysis HSC data for juvenile fish. HSC relationships for rearing of D,V,S, Cover Needed for flow-habitat modeling Empirical data from FDA and ELH studies; 1980s data and information; HSC and HSI data for juvenile fish. Site specific HSC data (HSC-models) and curve development, coupled with 1980s data and other HSC sources. 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 9 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) 3 What is the permanency of rearing areas in main channel habitats during the open water flow periods. (EFFECTIVE REARING HABITAT) Effective rearing habitat in main channel areas of FAs width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different time steps (daily, weekly, monthly); rearing habitat duration analysis; supplemental analysis at selected cross sections. Hydraulic models (2-D) linked with fish habitat models (Fish 2D- models); habitat models incorporate HSC and HSI functions (HSC and HSI - models). Changes to groundwater flow and HSI-models in lateral areas based on (GW-analysis. 4 What is the permanency of rearing areas in lateral habitats during the open water flow periods. (EFFECTIVE REARING HABITAT) Effective rearing habitat in lateral habitat areas of FAs width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different time steps (daily, weekly, monthly); rearing habitat duration analysis; supplemental analysis at selected cross sections. Hydraulic models (2-D) linked with Habitat Models (2-D); EHA model outputs by species. 5 What is the permanency of rearing areas in main channel habitats during the ice covered flow periods. (EFFECTIVE REARING HABITAT - ICE CONDITIONS) Effective rearing habitat in main channel areas of FAs width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different time steps during ice cover periods (daily, weekly, monthly); rearing habitat duration analysis; supplemental analysis at selected cross sections. River2D Hydraulic model outputs with specified ice cover (WSE, velocity, depth); output from River1D Ice processes model - WSEs, ice thickness(2-d);linked with Habitat Models (2-D). 6 What is the permanency of rearing areas in lateral habitats during the ice covered flow periods. Effective rearing habitat in main channel areas of FAs width (ft) or area (ft2) by species over different time steps during ice cover periods (daily, weekly, monthly); rearing habitat duration analysis; supplemental analysis at selected cross sections. River2D Hydraulic model outputs with specified ice cover (WSE, velocity, depth); output from River1D Ice processes model - WSEs, ice thickness(2-d);linked with Habitat Models (2-D). 7 What flows limit (regulate?) juvenile Computed hydrologic metrics (site specific passage into and out of lateral habitats (side low flow statistics that incorporate Q and sloughs, side channels, tributary mouths)? (JUVENILE PASSAGE INTO LATERAL duration; e.g. Indian River mouth Min.Q Pass (X t-duration ) exceedences) HABITATS) Pre-Post operations comparisons (short term) Barrier Analysis coupled with 2-D hydraulic modeling (at FA level Macrohabitats) or 1-D modeling (at other targeted tributaries) to define flow-based passage constraints, and then complete Pre-versus Post hydrologic analysis of those conditions with OWFRmodel. 8 Others.. 9 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 10 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) 10 Smolt Smolt Outmigration Smolt Outmigration 1 What are the outmigration patterns of smolts in the Susitna River - timing, peak migration periods? Range of migration intervals; 95% CI interval by species; median dates of passage; quartiles, etc. Smolt Outmigration 2 What flows occur during smolt migration periods in the mainstem Susitna River? Computed hydrologic metrics centered around migration periods (modified IHA or EFC parameters) (e.g. frequency of freshets, mean or median values of Wet, Dry, Ave. flows during migration periods). Empirical data from RST monitoring, ELH, and FDA studies; literature including 1980s reports. Hydrologic - IHA/EFC type analysis performed on Pre-versus Post hydrology for migration periods. Smolt Outmigration 3 What water quality conditions occur during smolt migration periods in the mainstem Susitna River? Water quality metrics; DO, temp, nutrients, metals, others; exceedence metrics over spawning periods (e.g. 10%, 50%, 90%) and others. Coarse EFDC water quality modeling outputs for Temp, DO, ph, conductivity, nutrients, metals and other relevant constituents at X-sections in main channel (WQ-model). Smolt 4 Others.. Outmigration Smolt 5 Outmigration Smolt Outmigration 6 General General General 1 Will fresh water fish production (measureable as number per unit area) be affected by Project operations? Based on individual fish species production, develop HSC curves for nutrients that reflect a condition gradient for production of periphyton, BMI, that infer relationship with fish production. Changes to nutrient concentrations from Pre- to Post Project operations may influence food base for early life stages of fishes. Relationship between food availability and trophic stages. Spatially explicit EFDC water quality modeling outputs for Temp, DO, ph, conductivity, nutrients (TP, TKN, NH3-N, Chla), and other relevant constituents at X- sections in main channel. General 2 Others.. General 3 General 4 Resident Fish Spawning, etc. Spawning, etc. Resident Fish Spawning, etc. 1 Resident Fish Spawning, etc. 2 Resident Fish Spawning, etc. 3 Beluga whale Foraging Life stage functions linked with flow 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 11 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION

Instream Flow Studies: Anadromous (Freshwater Phases) Beluga whale Foraging 1 Beluga whale Foraging 2 Beluga whale Foraging 3 Eulachon Spawning, etc. Spawning, etc. Eulachon Spawning, etc. 1 Eulachon Spawning, etc. 2 Eulachon Spawning, etc. 3 Other Life stage Life stage functions or activities linked with flow Other resources - wildlife, Life stage functions or activities linked 1 recreation, etc. with flow Other Life stage resources - functions or wildlife, activities linked recreation, etc. with flow Other Life stage resources - functions or wildlife, activities linked recreation, etc. with flow 2 3 2014_04_15-17TT_Riverine_BiologicalMetricsTable.xlsx Page 12 of 12 DRAFT - SUBJECT TO REVISION