Site Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky

Similar documents
DRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan Guide

Development of Remediation Targets for Contaminated Land

Endpoint Selection Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

A PROTOCOL FOR THE DERIVATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY GUIDELINES FOR USE AT CONTAMINATED SITES PN 1533 ISBN PDF

Risk Assessment & Generic Assessment Criteria for Groundwater Vapours

2. Appendix Y: Vapor Intrusion Modeling Requirements (Appendix to Statewide health standard VI guidance in the Technical Guidance Manual)

Vapour Intrusion Regulatory Framework and Case Law Review

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules

Steve Mailath, M.Sc., P.Geol. April 10, 2014 WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

Initial Review. CCME Canada Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Prepared for. Eric Partridge, Director Environmental Management Branch

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

Is this the maturation Phase of Vapor Intrusion Investigations?

Modeling the Vapor Intrusion Pathway: Revisions to the MCP GW-2 Groundwater Standards

Esdat Environmental Database Management Software

USERS GUIDE. Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand

VAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response

Register of Contaminated Land Consent Conditions

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

Establishing Critical Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) for Lead-Affected Soils

6.3.2 Exposure Assessment

Chlorinated Hydrocarbons A Widespread Issue

Professional Services HCR is a one-stop shop for all your design and construction needs.

A Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites With PCB Contamination

PROPOSED CHANGES TO REVISE WATER STANDARDS IN SCHEDULE 6 OF CSR. Heather Osachoff, MSc, PhD, RPBio Risk Assessment Officer May 20, 2015

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE. Concentration Limits for the Protection of Aquatic Receiving Environments ON CONTAMINATED SITES

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

August Vapor Intrusion Guidance FAQs

Information Requirements Table for Liquid Waste

OSWER DIRECTIVE Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions

Groundwater Risk Assessment

Oregon Guidance for Assessing and Remediating Vapor Intrusion in Buildings

Portsmouth Water Response

Atlantic RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada. Version 3. User Guidance

Risk Evaluation of Leachable Mercury From Concrete Products Made With Fly Ash

Guide to the City of San Francisco s Reduced Risk Pesticide List Revised February 2013

Letter Health Consultation

Groundwater Monitoring Requirements of the CCR Rule What s Next?

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup

TORCH LAKE TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Copyright 2007 Essex Contaminated Land Consortium All rights reserved. December 2007 v2

Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment with Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) Freeware

EPA s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Modern Electroplating Site Update. Dudley Vision Advisory Task Force September 2008 Meeting

Brownfield Redevelopment Technical Brief

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY

Lecture 2, Part 1, Conceptual Site Models for Exposure Assessment

ITRC ISM Team (90 members)

Overview of Dredged Material Testing and Evaluation

The Environmental Management and Protection (Saskatchewan Environmental Code Adoption) Regulations

State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

Moving Towards Sustainable Remediation: Optimization Concepts and Strategy

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Mercury Contaminated land management state of the art. NICOLE Mercury Working Group Paper

Tighes Hill Remediation Project Update

ATLANTIC RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) Ecological Screening Protocol for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Comparison of risk assessment methods for polluted soils in Sweden, Norway and Denmark

Position Statement (WAT-PS-10-01)

Status of Ecological Risk Assessment in Texas: On-Line Tools for Project Planning, Assessment and Decision Making

Site Status Report for the

Corrective action design and implementation Petroleum Remediation Program

Case Study of Modeled and Observed TCE Attenuation from Groundwater to Indoor Air. Christopher G. Lawless Johnson Wright, Inc.

CHROMIUM EXPOSURE AND HEALTH EFFECTS IN HUDSON COUNTY

RISC 4. User s Manual. Developers: Lynn R. Spence Spence Engineering Pleasanton, California. Terry Walden BP Oil International Sunbury, UK

Report on. Screening Level Risk Assessment. SLRA Level 1 and SLRA Level 2

PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY

Health Assessment Section

The Dirt on Excess Soil Across Canada How Will Brownfields Be Affected?

Master Environmental Servicing Plan and Secondary Plan

Toxicology Section of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) TSCC-HH TCEQ Representatives Joseph Kip Haney & Vincent Leopold

Impact of Organic farming on aquatic environment

Product SDS. Code number(s): ATS2015-1ML, ATS2015-9ML, ATS ML, ATS ML, ATS ML-2

New Tier 1 Boron Guideline for Alberta: Boron Soil Ecotoxicity and Methods Development Research

National Standard for Environmental Risk Management of Industrial Chemicals

Collection #432 Butterworth Landfill Files Collection 432

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET AQUATROL CAT100E CAT100E/1013. Polystyrene Divinylbenzene. Sodium AQUATROL E. Belmont Street Ontario, CA 91761

1. Product and company identification. 2. Hazards identification. Page No. 1. a) Product Name : D532

Updated J&E Model VIAModel.xls

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

USETOX / USETOX tool. Enhanced toxicity assessment. Based on Payet et al. 2014, Rosenbaum 2011, Fantke 2014

Case Studies of Innovative Use of Tracers, Indicators and Field GC/MS for Assessing the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors Based On Long Term Monitoring Data

Initiation of Emerging Contaminants Characterization and Response Actions for Protection of Human Health

Technical Impracticability Determinations

Soil Vapor Extraction System Optimization, Transition, and Closure Guidance

Chemical Constituents in Coal Combustion Residues: Risks and Toxicological Updates

Worksheet #1 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Drinking Water Well Condition

Potential Environmental Impact of Produced Water

SAFETY DATA SHEET ENDURE CLEAR AND SOFT HAND SOAP

Completion of the MSc programme gives the graduate the right to use the title Master of Science (MSc) in Water and Environment.

Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDER NO. EPO SSR. Sears Canada Inc. [Sears] C/O. Lloyd McLellan. Eli Consulting Canada Inc.

Monitoring and Assessment of Chemical Quality. Session Objectives

Transcription:

Site Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky

Outline Contaminated Site Management Policy General Principles of Risk Assessment Tiered Risk Assessment Framework Features of the Vapour Guidance Conceptual Site Model Calculation of the acceptable soil vapour concentration Sampling Protocol Data Interpretation and Analysis

Contaminated site management -Policy Pollution prevention Not pollute-up-to guidelines Source control Full delineation Protection for cross-media transfer Protection of Water Resources

Objectives of EPEA for Contaminated Sites Management System Environmental Management Goals Equivalent land capability Maintaining ability of land to support various uses Prevention of adverse effect Impairment/damage to environment, human health, safety, property Past, present and future component Has caused, is causing or may cause adverse effect Principle of sustainable development Responsible use of resources and environment Maintain non-impairment for future generations Regulatory risk management goal Preserve range of land use options

Risk Assessment A characterization of the likelihood that a substance will produce harm to human health or ecosystems under specific conditions Chemicals Of Concern Contaminant Toxicity Risk Receptors Human, Terrestrial Ecological Receptors Soil Receptors, Aquatic Life (1) Will exposure occur? (2) Consequences of exposure? Exposure Pathways Contaminant migration Human ingestion & inhalation Ecological direct contact

Site Specific Risk Assessment -Policy Environmental Process Soil-to-Groundwater Modelling Soil Contact Process Soil Ingestion Process (Agr; Res for biomagnifying) Nutrient & Energy Cycling Check Offsite Migration Check (Com, Ind) SQG FL SQG LW (Agr) SQG IR (Agr) SQG SC SQG I SQG E

Site Specific Risk Assessment -Policy

Exposure - Contaminant Fate & Behavior Partitioning* Transport* Exposure Soil Vapour Johnson & Ettinger model Indoor Human Vapour Inhalation Soil Source No Partitioning/Transport - Direct Soil Exposure Dilution model Porewater to DUA Human Ingestion/Dermal Ecological Direct Contact Human Drinking Water Soil Pore Water Dilution model Porewater to Surface Water Ecological Aquatic Life

Framework for Contaminated Site Assessment and Remediation Contaminated Site Identification and Characterization Environmental Quality Guidelines Guideline-based Approach Site-specific Approach TIER I: Adopt Guidelines Directly TIER II Pathway Exclusion, Guideline Adjustment: Modify Guidelines within Limits TIER II: SSRA Recommended Site-specific Remediation Objective Risk Management Goal

Major Features of the Vapour Guidance. Conceptual Site Model Calculation of the acceptable soil vapour concentration Sampling Protocol Sampling Strategy Probe Construction and Installation Soil Gas Analysis Data Interpretation and Analysis

Conceptual Site Model Example of a Conceptual Site Model for Vapour Intrusion into a Residential Building (adapted from US EPA, 2002)

CSM Risk Evaluation, Main Features Source and distribution of Contamination Receptor Risks Description of Fate and Transport

CSM Data Evaluation, Main Features Delineation: chemical distribution and presence in different media of concern Location and distribution of all contaminants of concern Geological Information Hydrogeological information (where relevant based on contaminant distribution) Utility corridors that may influence contaminant migration Others as may be relevant to site specific circumstances.

Calculation of the Site Specific Dilution Factor 1.E-02 Distance (m) Sand (Coarsegrained) Loamy Sand Sandy Loam Loam (Finegrained) 1 2.83E-03 2.66E-03 2.28E-03 1.75E-03 2 2.02E-03 1.86E-03 1.51E-03 1.08E-03 3 1.57E-03 1.43E-03 1.13E-03 7.76E-04 Soil Vapour Attenuation Factor 1.E-03 1.E-04 Sand (coarse-grained) 5 1.09E-03 9.74E-04 7.48E-04 4.99E-04 7 8.33E-04 7.39E-04 5.60E-04 3.67E-04 10 6.16E-04 5.43E-04 4.07E-04 2.63E-04 15 4.30E-04 3.76E-04 2.79E-04 1.79E-04 20 3.30E-04 2.88E-04 2.13E-04 1.35E-04 30 2.25E-04 1.96E-04 1.44E-04 9.12E-05 Loamy Sand Sandy Loam Loam (fine-grained) 1.E-05 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Distance from building to vapour measurement (m) Figure 5. Residential Soil Vapour to Indoor Air Attenuation Factors

Sampling Strategy

Probe Construction and Installation Sampling QA/QC Well Equilibration Leak/Short circuiting detection. Well Purging Flow and Performance Checks Sampling, sample collection and Storage Requirements.

Soil Gas Analysis Final site assessment will require analysis at fixed laboratory facilities Field screening methods cannot be used for final site assessment although they may provide screening information during preliminary and remedial stages. Sampling protocols will need to correspond with sample preservation needs required for fixed laboratory analysis. Some sampling methods do not provide adequate sample preservation. Protocols will be defined against detection limit requirements.

Data Interpretation and Analysis Outline of data reporting requirements Data quality analysis: Final QA/QC check Data consistency: are results consistent through different lines of evidence/predictions/csm.

Timelines Completion of Draft Vapour Guidance (2007) Completion of Public Review (Winter, 2008) Completion of Final Draft (Spring 2008) Thank you