Multimedia Impacts of Halogen Injection for Mercury Control in Coal- Fired Boilers

Similar documents
Mercury Control in the Boiler

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Mercury Measurement and Control

Evaluation of Mercury Control Strategies in the Presence of SO 3 Using the MerSim TM Model. Brydger Van Otten, Bradley Adams

Fuel Quality and MATS for Coal- Fired Plants: The Ripple Effect

Mercury Capture in Conventional APC Technologies

Reducing Operating Costs and Risks of Hg Control with Novel Fuel Additives

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

MerSim TM Mercury Model. Abstract. Introduction. Mercury Control Strategies

The KNX TM Coal Additive Technology A Simple Solution for Mercury Emissions Control

Controlling Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Mercury Measure and Capture: PAC Injection in the WFGD. Michelle Brown, PE & Dr. Christine Valcarce McIIvaine Company Hot Topic Hour March 5, 2015

REINHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL Ltd NOx-Combustion-CCR Round Table Presentation. February 1 & 2, 2016, in Orlando, FL / Hosted by OUC

The Balance-of-Plant Impacts of Calcium Bromide Injection as a Mercury Oxidation Technology in Power Plants

EMO August 1, Bobby I.T. Chen Client Program Manager

Assessment of Bias in Measurement of Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants Comparison of Electronic CEMS and Sorbent Traps

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control on Industrial Coal-Fired Boilers

Measurement of Corrosion Rate Associated with Halogen for Hg Oxidation

Prediction Hg Removals With Activated Carbon Injection in Utility Gas Cleaning Systems

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Advances in Mercury Control Technology for Industrial Sources. July 9, 2008

Reducing the Cost of Compliance and Improving Plant Operations for Coal-Fired Boilers

SCR for NO x Control in Coal-fired Power Plants

Cross-effects and total gas clean-up system lay-out

Local Impacts of Mercury from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Chlorine and Bromine in Coals and their Influence on Mercury Removal from Flue Gases

Mercury Control in North America Using Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC)

Field Test Program to Evaluate Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Facilities with SCR-FGD Systems

Accelerating Mercury Control

Acid Gas Removal with Trona Focus on HCl Reduction. Jarret McClendon -Applications Engineer Josh Allen Applications Engineer

A Look into the Crystal Ball: Post-MATS Utility Environmental Challenges

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

States Programs on Coal-Fired Utility Mercury Controls and Measurements; Status of Utility Mercury Control Technologies

LARGE-SCALE MERCURY CONTROL TECHNOLOGY TESTING FOR LIGNITE-FIRED UTILITIES OXIDATION SYSTEMS FOR WET FGD

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Halogens, dioxins/furans

Sheila Glesmann / December 5, 2016 / SVP, ADA Carbon Solutions, LLC

Fate of Mercury in Cement Kilns

Predicting the impact of SO 3 on mercury removal by carbon sorbents

Trends in Treating WFGD Effluent

Full-Scale Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control in Flue Gas Derived from North Dakota Lignite

Advances in Refined Coal Technology for Emissions Reduction

Mercury Oxidation Across SCR Catalyst at LG&E s Trimble County Unit 1

Getting Mercury Out of Coal Combustion Gases

Results of Activated Carbon Injection Upstream of Electrostatic Precipitators for Mercury Control

Effects of Quench Rate, NO, and Quartz Surface Area on Gas Phase Oxidation of Mercury by Bromine

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Emissions Calculations - Stack

Experience with Mercury Compliance. Gary Blythe, Katherine Dombrowski, Gwen Eklund, Mandi Richardson

Fate of Mercury in Coal Byproducts from DOE's Mercury Control Technology Field Testing Program and Related Projects

Industrial Boiler MACT Rule Impact and Control Options for Mercury and Dioxins/Furans

EVALUATING MATS OPTIONS WITH FIELD DEMONSTRATIONS

Cost-Effective Strategies and Emerging Federal and State Regulations for Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Mercury Reduction Performance of Concrete-Friendly C-PAC Sorbent

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Process Optimization Guidance for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion in Power Plants

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

A Better Alternative to SO 3 for conditioning Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP)

Mercury Measurement and Its Control: What We Know, Have Learned, and Need to Further Investigate

CHARACTERIZATION OF FLY ASH FROM FULL-SCALE DEMONSTRATION OF SORBENT INJECTION FOR MERCURY CONTROL ON COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION

G.T. Bielawski J.B. Rogan D.K. McDonald The Babcock & Wilcox Company Barberton, Ohio, U.S.A.

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Impact of SCR on Mercury Speciation and Removal Update

Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas by V 2 O 5 /TiO 2 Catalysts Dispersed on Mesoporous Silica

Commercial Experience with Concrete-Friendly Mercury Sorbents

September 20, Water Docket U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 4203M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

The Growth of Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) and the impact on Coal Combustion Residue

Integrating ADAir Mixer Technology to Optimize System Performance with DSI Applications

Coal Fired Boiler Optimization and the Impact on Emission Control Devices

MATS Performance Testing of ACI and DSI Systems: Guidelines and Lessons

Dry Sorbent Injection and Modeling for Acid Gas Emissions Control. Lew Benson McIlvaine Hot Topic Hour June 7, 2012

BCURA B73 Research Contract

Optimizing Absorber STEP 2 - FGDplus Working principle for DeSOx

Demonstrations of Amended Silicates for Mercury Control in Coal Fired Generating Units

TECHNICAL PUBLICATION

A Fixed Structure Approach to Mercury Control for Coal Fired Power Plants

Bromine Derivative Benefits for Mercury Emissions Reduction

The Future of Coal Ash

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI

Gas Flow How to Improve It to Enhance ESP, Boiler, FGD, SCR, SNCR Performance

Mercury Measurements and Control

EPA Studies on the Control of Toxic Air Pollution Emissions from Electric Utility Boilers

Pre-SCR Injection Of Sodium Sorbents

Wastewater Treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge Technologies: Overview and New Developments Gordon Maller URS Process Technologies, Austin, TX

Chemkin Simulation of Mercury Oxidation in a Condensing Heat Exchanger

MERCURY, SOx AND DUST CONTROL BREF - BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES REFERENCE

MERCURY CONTROL WITH THE ADVANCED HYBRID PARTICULATE COLLECTOR

Simulation and Prediction of Pollutants in a Flexi-Burn Oxyfuel Pulverized Coal Power Plant

MERCURY CONTROL WITH FABRIC FILTERS FROM COAL-FIRED BOILERS

A Review of DOE/NETL s Mercury Control Technology R&D Program for Coal-Fired Power Plants

FULL-SCALE EVALUATION OF MERCURY CONTROL BY INJECTING ACTIVATED CARBON UPSTREAM OF ESPS

INTERIM FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001

Air Pollution Compliance Strategies for Coal Generation

ESP Does Size Really Matter?

Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China

Evaluating Metals Sequestration in Ash by Powdered Activated Carbon

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001 DEMONSTRATION OF SORBENT INJECTION PROCESS FOR ILLINOIS COAL MERCURY CONTROL

Research & Development Needs for the Clean Coal Plant of the Future

Gary Blythe and Ben Bayer, URS Corporation John Grocki, Advantage Resources Consulting, LLC Casey Smith, Lower Colorado River Authority

Transcription:

Multimedia Impacts of Halogen Injection for Mercury Control in Coal- Fired Boilers Connie Senior, Ken Baldrey, Will Morris, Sharon Sjostrom Presented at EUEC January 30, 2012 ADA: Innovate, Develop, Commercialize

Motivation for This Presentation Adding halogens increases Hg oxidation, native capture, and removal efficiency of ACI You ll hear a lot about halogens at EUEC sometimes perspective is useful

Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: Halogen content of US coals varies widely

http://ugs.utah.gov/emp/mercury/index.htm

Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: Halogen content of US coals varies widely Br, ug/g Source: USGS COALQUAL database Bromine content typically 1% to 4% of chlorine content 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Eastern Interior (Illinois Basin) y = 0.0482x R² = 0.1319 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Cl, ug/g

Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: 500 ug/g Cl in coal = ~40 ppmv HCl in flue gas 500 ug/g Br in coal = ~17 ppmv HBr in flue gas HX in gas, ppmv, 3% O 2 dry 100 80 60 40 20 0 HCl HBr 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Halogen in Coal, µg/g dry

Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: Halogen content of US coals varies widely Oxidation of Hg and capture of Hg on fly ash enhanced with additions of halogens, like Cl and Br %Oxidized Hg at Air Preheater Outlet 100 80 60 40 20 0 Halogen addition at various full-scale PRB boilers 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Halogen in Coal, ppmw dry NaCl MgCl2 CaCl2 HCl CaBr2 Source: Dombrowski et al., 2006

Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: Halogen content of US coals varies widely Oxidation of Hg and capture of Hg on fly ash enhanced with additions of halogens, like Cl and Br Many plants APCDs can take advantage of native capture Hg Removal across FGD 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 10 100 1,000 10,000 Coal Chlorine, ppm dry Source: 1999 ICR

100 90 Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to activated carbon increases the ability to capture elemental Hg in lowhalogen flue gas (subbituminous or lignite) Brominated Carbon % Vapor-phase Hg Removal 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Meramec 2, Darco Hg-LH Meramec 2, Darco Hg Stanton 1, Darco Hg-LH Stanton 1, B-PAC Stanton 1, Darco Hg 0 2 4 6 8 10 Sorbent (lb/mmacf) Non- Brominated Carbon

Summary: Why Add Halogens? Adding halogens to fuel or flue gas: Halogen content of US coals varies widely Oxidation of Hg and capture of Hg on fly ash enhanced with additions of halogens, like Cl and Br Many plants APCDs can take advantage of native capture Adding halogens to activated carbon increases the ability to capture elemental Hg in lowhalogen flue gas

How Effective Are Halogens? Halogens increase oxidized mercury: Br more effective than Cl Increased Hg removal across scrubbers Removal of Hg across FGD 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Dry FGD, FF Wet FGD 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fraction Hg 2+ at Inlet Source: DOE/EPRI sampling campaigns

How Effective Are Halogens? Halogens increase oxidized mercury: Br more effective than Cl Increased Hg removal across scrubbers Total Hg Removal (coal-to-stack) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Monticello: PRB/lignite, ESP, wet FGD Chlorine addition Bromine injection 1 10 100 1000 10000 Halogen in coal, ug/g

How Effective Are Halogens? Halogens increase oxidized mercury: Br more effective than Cl Increased Hg removal across scrubbers Halogens increase effectiveness of PAC Hg Removal 100 80 60 40 20 0 Plant Hardin: SCR/SDA/FF KNX + 0.14 lb/mmacf PAC KNX 0% 20% 40% 60% Percent recommended KNX rate Source: DOE/EPRI sampling campaigns

Effect of SCRs on Added Halogens Catalysts drive reactions toward equilibrium Results will be catalyst-specific Adding Br to the fuel makes the shift to Hg 2+ take place at higher temperatures (than Cl) 100% %Oxidized Hg 80% 60% 40% Baseline + 3 ug/g Br 20% + 18 ug/g Br + 33 ug/g Br + 328 ug/g Br 0% 600 700 800 900 Temperature, o F Equilibrium modeling of Plant Miller data of Berry et al.

Effect of SCRs on Added Halogens Catalysts drive reactions toward equilibrium Results will be catalyst-specific Adding Br to the fuel makes the shift to Hg 2+ take place at higher temperatures (than Cl) Hg 0, ug/dnm 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 SCR Inlet SCR Outlet Equilibrium 0 100 200 300 400 Added Br, ug/g coal equivalent Comparison of Plant Miller data of Berry et al. with calculated equilibrium

Effect of SCRs on Added Halogens Bromine is more efficient (equal mass basis) than chlorine at oxidizing Hg across SCRs Hg 0, ug/dnm 3 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Equilibrium at 720 o F Subbituminous Coals Bromine Results will be catalyst-specific Subbituminous (low-chlorine) coals only 0.5 0.0 Chlorine 0 100 200 300 400 Halogen, ug/g coal equivalent

Fate and Impacts of Halogens What are the potential impacts of halogen addition on the boiler, APCDs, and emissions? Corrosion Fly ash Stack emissions Scrubber interactions Boiler SCR Air Heater Stack Fuel Burners Particulate Collector SO 2 Scrubber Induced Draft Fan Coal Pulverization Coal Supply

Corrosion in Flue Gas Chlorine corrosion in furnaces can occur for very high levels of chlorine in coal (> 2000 µg/g) Bromine addition at much lower concentrations Indirect evidence that HBr might be more corrosive than HCl at flue gas temperature No direct comparison, but HBr corrosion higher than baseline (no HBr) in simulated flue gas (6-month study) Corrosion loss, mm 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Baseline 51 ppmv HBr 0 100 200 300 400 Temperature, o F Zhuang et al., 2009

Bromine Addition: Fly Ash Impacts Bromine additive or brominated PAC results in increase in Br in fly ash Example: Br injection at Monticello (C-ESP) Br, µg/g Br in fly ash Br injected 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 11/1/05 11/15/05 11/29/05 12/13/05 Bromine injection at Monticello (EERC, URS data) 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Br addedm µg/g coal

Bromine Addition: Fly Ash Impacts Fly Ash, µg/g 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Bromine additive or brominated PAC results in increase in Br in fly ash Example: Br injection at Plant Miller (PRB, C-ESP) According to the authors: Br in Fly Ash Br in Leachate 0 20 40 60 Added Br, µg/g coal equivalent 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Leachate, mg/l Hg concentration in fly ash didn't increase with Br injection 1% of Br captured by fly ash 50% of Br on fly ash leached in SPLP test Dombrowski et al., 2008

Source: 2010 ICR Chlorine Emission from APCDs

Bromine Emission from APCDs PIPP Meramec FF C-ESP Brominated PAC injection Boiler 1 Boiler 2 C-ESP C-ESP Fuel addition Boiler 3 C-ESP 0% 50% 100% Percent of added halogen emitted in stack All boilers are pulverized coal, burning subbituminous coal

Source: 2010 ICR Chlorine Emission from APCDs

Halogens in Wet Scrubbers Adding halogens (Cl or Br) increases oxidized Hg, which increase capture of Hg in scrubber Wet FGD scrubbers remove halogens efficiently Average Cl removals for wet FGDs (2010 ICR): 81% for subbituminous, 97% for bituminous Removal of Br at Plant Miller wet FGD: 94-96% (Dombrowski et al., 2008) Halogens build up in wet scrubber liquor

Halogens in Wet Scrubbers Halogens build up in wet scrubber liquor slowly, depending on scrubber design Br, mg/l, Hg, µg/l 500 400 300 200 100 Br in FGD liquor Hg in FGD liquor Br injected 0 11/1/05 11/15/05 11/29/05 12/13/05 Bromine injection at Monticello (EERC, URS data) 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Br addedm µg/g coal

Halogens and Wet Scrubbers Increased Cl, Br concentration in scrubber liquor can decrease Hg re-emission Recent observations (Air Quality VIII) that Br addition to the fuel increases Se in scrubber liquor Data from bituminous site with C-ESP, wet FGD Se in fly ash, µg/g % Se capture by fly ash Se in FGD liquor, µg/l Baseline 24 70% 300 Br addition 10 20% 4900 (Dombrowski et al., 2011) Less uptake of Se by fly ash means more Se enters FGD

Summary Halogen fuel/flue gas additives OR halogenated PAC Where do halogens go? Some removal in particulate control devices Efficient removal in FGDs Br is new kid on the block information needed: Corrosion Multi-media fate Trace metal interactions Fuel Halogen Injection Boiler Burners Coal Pulverization SCR Air Heater Halogenated Carbon Injection Particulate Collector Fly Ash Coal Supply Stack SO 2 Induced Scrubber Draft Fan Scrubber Blowdown Stack Emission

Questions? ADA: Innovate, Develop, Commercialize NASDAQ: ADES www.adaes.com