Why LNG? LNG is mainly produced for transportation purposes. More economical to transport gas as LNG compared to pipelines over long distances

Similar documents
Marine Transportation of LNG. Intertanko Conference March 29, 2004 Bob Curt Ship Acquisition Manager, QatargasII Development

American Institute of Marine Underwriters

Handling and Transportation of LNG

Lecture 10 LNG Shipping

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MARINE ASPECTS OF LNG FPSOs (FLOATING PRODUCTION, STORAGE AND OFFLOAD) UNITS. Braemar Engineering

Ship Transportation of Natural Gas

GUIDANCE ON LNG BoG MONITORING

Development of Efficient, Environmentally Friendly and Flexible Shipboard Regasification Vessel

A Leader In Maritime Technology

The World First Ever Very Large Ethane Carrier (VLEC)

EUROPEAN ENERGY FORUM 2013

Environmentally Friendly & Superior Solution with LNG as Fuel

Comparison of Spherical and Membrane Large LNG Carriers in Terms of Cargo Handling

MB05. RESPOND TO EMERGENCIES BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, INCLUDING EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN

ConferenzaGNL 2014 GENOVA 27/10/2014. Tipologie e caratteristiche di navi con propulsione GNL e relative sistemazioni degli impianti M.E.S.

Development of SPB LNG Fuel Tank for Ships

Creating Optimal LNG Storage Solutions. 40 in detail

Need update. Maritime Forecast to 2050 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL 2018

MB05. RESPOND TO EMERGENCIES BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, INCLUDING EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN

JungHan Lee, Principal Research Engineer, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Company

Environmentally Superior Vessels with LNG as Fuel; Achievements and Prospects for the Near Future

Anatomy of LNG Shipping & Operations

Risk Assessment of Operation of LNG Tankers. LNG Conference Copenhagen

SCF Shipping Solutions for Yamal LNG Innovative Design for the Arctic Sergey Frank, President & CEO

LNG Systems for Marine Application. LNG Reliquefaction & LNG Regasification. Oil & Gas Systems

2017 LPG Loading Master & Certification (3 Days)

Need update. Maritime Forecast to 2050 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL 2018

On Board Regasification for LNG Ships. 22 nd World Gas Conference WS 3-2 Tokyo 2003 Wayne Perry

Hamburg, October 2014 Brian Bender Madsen

MARITIME LNG, REGULATION AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 25 November 2014 Andrew Morris, Director

IMO future plans for regulation

Structural and Containment System Design Aspects of Large LNG Ships

LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

2019 LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

The Steps Before Unmanned Ships

Chapter 23. Liquefied Natural Gas

LNG carriers and bunkering vessels

A new re-liquefaction system of MRS-F (Methane Refrigeration System Full re-liquefaction) for LNG Carriers

The Technical & Practical challenges of FLNG

The latest issues on gas fuelled ship (including New IGF Code)

Table of contents. 1. Global Environments 2. Green Ship Technologies in Korea

LNG Carriers Ship Life Extension. Ed Waryas. Lloyd s Register North America, Inc.

B.C. TOWBOAT INDUSTRY CONFERENCE

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

OVER VIEW OF LNG SHIPPING SAFETY CONCERNS. Presentation by Capt. B.B. Sinha. The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd New Delhi.

LNG CARRIERS. Eniram Solutions for H I G H W I N D S O N T H E R O U T E - T R I M 2 3 C M B Y T H E B O W F O U L I N G I N C R E A S E D B Y 1 2

Marine Facilities for LNG Carrier Transfer Alternatives

Low Carbon Technology for Marine Application. Hyundai Heavy Industries / Corporate Research Center Se-Young Oh, Sangmin Park Nov.

Ship Powering Options for the Future. An Outline Synopsis of the Study

2019 LPG Loading Master & LPG Terminal Operations - 3 days

Panel Discussion: Energy Conservation

Christopher R Clucas. Current Position at CWA

SAMSUNG Energy Plant: All-in-One Solution for Floating Power Plants with Gas-fired Combined Cycle Gas Turbines

LNG Bunkering and the risks involved in operations using LNG as fuels

Design Concept and Features of the Mitsubishi LNG-FPSO (Floating Production, Storage and Offloading Unit)

Part 0 - Classification and Surveys Classification and Surveys I Classification and Surveys I

Ship Efficiency: The Event 2016 Fathom Maritime Intelligence. Going Green as Sustainable Business Strategy

Braemar Technical Services

Transport Costs Affecting LNG Delivery by Moss Type Carriers

LNG as a marine bunker fuel

Introduction of Gas Turbine- Powered, LPG Fueled Ship. Byeongyeol Baek Advanced Lead Engineer GE s Marine Solutions March 6 to 7, 2018

Properties Of Membrane Tanks For Transportation Of LNG Cargo On Ships

Alternative approaches to monitoring - 'Digital Twin' of vessel performance -

LNG: strategic challenge for the Mediterranean Shipping

Current Development of Shipbuilding Technology - Japan. Dave (Hiroshi) IWAMOTO Chairman of International sub-committee, SAJ

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) Guidance Notes for Ship Owners and Ship Operators. Asia Pacific Ship Registry

A clean environment. Towards zero-emission shipping BUSINESS WHITE PAPER KEY BENEFITS CONTENTS

Energy Efficiency SEEMP

LNG Shipping. Taking Gas and Power Further. Shell Gas & Power

RESOLUTION MEPC.213(63) Adopted on 2 March GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEEMP)

Big Data in Ship Operation

This document is a preview generated by EVS

SUSTAINABLE SHIPPING AND PORT TRENDS. Habil. Dr., Captain, Prof. Vytautas Paulauskas Klaipeda Shipping Research Centre

IACS Rec s and Panel Responsible

Ship to Ship Transfer (POAC/Superintendent) for Liquefied Natural Gas and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LNG or LPG) (3 days) (OCIMF)

IACS Rec s and Panel Responsible

ABI6010 International Technical Certificate in Jetty and Terminal Operational Safety UNIT 1 TERMINAL MANAGEMENT, SAFETY AND SECURITY

READY FOR EVERYTHING

Fuel Efficient Container Liner Fleet Operations

LNG BUNKERING VESSELS AND CNG CARRIERS -Innovative solutions to improve sustainability- LNG/SHORE POWER Workshop TRIESTE 10 th of March 2016

Application for a recommendation on the use of membrane tanks for transport of liquefied natural gas on the tank vessel Argos-GL

Innovative solutions for LNG carriers. A classification society view.

General presentation May 2016

LNG sloshing for new designs, new operations and new trades

Classification of FSRUs

Climate Change and Energy

LNG supply Chain From the LNG receiving terminal to the LNG truck TrainMoS II

Marine Terminal Information Booklet

Design of LNG Powered Ships

Membrane CCS for LPG Carrier

IACS Rec s and Panel Responsible

GAZOCEAN Pioneer in Maritime Transportation of Liquefied gas

SEITZ Manfred Pro Danube Management GmbH, Vienna, Austria

UK P&I CLUB. Gas matters A focus on some of the issues surrounding gas tanker fleets in the P&I world UK P&I CLUB IS MANAGED BY THOMAS MILLER

SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN SEEMP. Edilberto Peralta Lloyd s Register Operations Manager Central and South America

LNG as fuel. OTMW-Module 5 Monday 23 rd of November 2015 University of Piraeus. Working together for a safer world

Enabling safe and reliable offshore LNG transfer operations By Vincent Lagarrigue, Marketing & Project Manager within Trelleborg Industrial Solutions

Port infrastructure for alternative fuels and maritime transport: the Livorno case

LNG Plant Overview. Seminar with Supplier Association Murmanshelf Murmansk, 15 May 2012 Jostein Pettersen

The Naming and Delivery Ceremony of Seri Cenderawasih on 20 January 2017 at the HHI Shipyard in Ulsan, South Korea

Transcription:

Classification: Internal Status: Draft LNG Shipping TEP 10 Gas Processing and LNG - 2008 Trygve G. Egge 2 Topics Why LNG? Historic overview Commercial fundamentals Technical aspects Operational aspects Technology trends

3 Why LNG? LNG is mainly produced for transportation purposes. More economical to transport gas as LNG compared to pipelines over long distances Volume ratio between natural gas and LNG is approximate 600:1. 4

5 European Cryogenic Courses Commercial fundamentals 6 LNG chain & cost - indications Gas Production Liquefaction Transportation Receiving Terminal $ 0.5-1.5 Bill. $ 1-1.5 Bill. $ 0.6-1.2 Bill. $ 0.5-0.7 Bill. $ 0.5-1.5/MMBtu $ 1-1.5/MMBtu $ 0.4-1.5/MMBtu $ 0.5-0.7/MMBtu Total Chain Cost $ 3.25-4.5 per MMBtu US Average forward HH gas price 2008-2012 = USD 10 MMBtu Source: Fearnley Consultants AS

7 LNG trade routes 8 Development of LNG carrier fleet

9 Newbuilding prices LNGC & VLCC 10 Newbuilding acquisition schedule

11 LNG transportation safety record LNG shipments started experimentally in the mid 1950 s, but the main trades did not begin until late 1970 s. To date there have been close to 40,000 LNG voyages (80,000 loaded port transits) with no loss of cargo! There have been two serious groundings, both in the late 1970 s, but neither of these resulted in cargo loss. As the El Paso Kayser event was very serious, striking a rock at 19kts, and the LNG Taurus grounding at 12 kts, these events are good confirmations of the inherent strength of this type of vessel with its additional barriers and physical separation of the cargo to the sea. 12 European Cryogenic Courses Technical aspects

13 Design Code Design, construction and operation of gas carriers are regulated through UN s shipping organisation IMO (International Maritime Organisation). The regulations are given in the publication International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk ( Gas Code ). Ships intended for carrying liquefied gases in bulk are categorised in three different types (type 1G, 2G/2PG and 3G) according to the product s hazard potential. LNG is classified as requiring type 2G ship 14 LNG transportation technical aspects LNG is transported at 163 deg. C and at atmospheric pressure This extreme low temperature require that the LNG is transported and handled with special consideration, i.e. Completely separated from the ship s hull LNG temperature must be maintained during the voyage requiring efficient insulation of the cargo tanks All cargo handling equipment must be able to operate at the extreme low temperature of -163 degr. C Two basically different cargo containment systems are used: Self supported independent tanks (Moss Rosenberg spherical tanks, IHI SPB, cylindrical tanks) Membrane tanks (Gaz Transport and Technigaz (GTT)) Market share between the two concepts has been ab. 50/50 - but the membrane concept has been increasingly selected for recent newbuilding orders.

15 Spherical tank cargo containment systems (Moss Rosenberg ) 16 Spherical LNG cargo tanks pros & cons Advantages Independent from the ship s hull hull stresses not transferred into the cargo tanks Very robust design No sloshing problems Can operate with partly filled tanks Allow simultaneous building of hull and cargo tanks Easy to inspect Easy to detect and repair leakages Disadvantages Low volumetric utilisation of the hull Larger physical dimensions for same capacity compared with prismatic tanks Visibility from bridge reduced compared with ships with prismatic tanks Require return cargo ( heel ) on ballast voyage to keep cargo tanks cooled

17 Upper half of spherical cargo tank 18 IHI SPB Tank

19 SPB cargo containment system pros & cons Advantages Independent from ship s hull Robust design No sloshing problems/ no filling restrictions High utilisation factor of the ship s hull Allow simultaneous construction of hull and tanks Smaller physical dimensions for same capacity compared to spherical tank design Disadvantages Costly to manufacture the cargo tanks Require heel on ballast voyage to maintain cooled down tanks 20 Ocean LNG Cylindrical Independent Tank

21 LNGC Membrane cargo containment system (GT No. 96, MK I and MK III, and CS1) 22 Mark III (Technigaz) Membrane system

23 Membrane cargo containment system (GTT) pros & cons Advantages High volumetric utilisation of ship s hull Less sensitive to temperature changes as inner membrane (invar steel) has very low thermal contraction coefficient Limited need for heel on ballast voyage Disadvantages Cargo tanks are an integrated part of the ship s hull - hull stresses transferred to cargo tanks Does not allow simultaneous construction of hull and cargo tanks Difficult to detect and costly to repair leakages Restricted filling ratio LNG Carriers Cargo containment systems 24

25 European Cryogenic Courses Operational aspects LNGC operating particulars 26 During transit voyages, boil off gas (BOG) is either used as fuel in the boilers for generating steam (steam ship) or re liquefied A small amount of LNG is retained onboard after discharging ( heel ) and is used for cooling the cargo tanks during the ballast voyage Measurements (custody and fiscal) of LNG is performed on board the ship after loading and discharging. LNG used by the ship is determined for each voyage Total port time is 20 24 hours including port clearance, safety checks, loading/discharging, cargo measurements, connection/disconnection of cargo arms Transit speed between 19 20 knots Fuel consumption about. 150 200 t/24 h (steam ship) Complement 25-30 persons

27 Ship/shore interfaces In order to achieve safe and efficient loading and discharging operation, standardised ship/shore interfaces are important. For LNG ships, the ship/shore interfaces are designed according to the following standards: SIGTTO (Society of International Gas Tanker and Terminal Operators) OCIMF (Oil Companies International Maritime Forum) EN 1532 (European Norm) Typical Ship/Shore interfaces include: Ship size (max/min) Arrangement of loading arms Fender arrangement Mooring arrangement Shore gangway ESD (Emergency Shut Down System) Normal and emergency communication system 28 European Cryogenic Courses Technology trends

29 Market and Technology trends Shipping demand is driven by: New trading routes Increased trading volumes Increased trading distances New vessels are adapting: New areas harsh environment arctic design conditions Increased vessel size Alternative propulsion system 30 LNG trade the past situation

31 LNG trade the future 32 New LNG trades harsh environment New LNG projects are being developed in remote and environmentally sensitive areas. Snøhvit Sakhalin Shtokman For arctic projects, the transportation will require special consideration wrt: Low sea and air temperatures High wind velocity High sea states Reduced visibility Long duration of adverse weather

33 LNG ships design aspects To secure the required off-take and transportation regularity with the highest level of safety, the following design aspects need to be considered: Structural safety (ice strengthening, fatique, extended FEM calculations). Environmental and safety features Navigation Winterisation (enclosed working areas, heat tracing of equipment). 34 Increased ship sizes The increasing demand for LNG, especially in the US and Europe, and the need to reduce long haul transportation costs from the Middle East to US/Europe, is driving the current increase in ship size. While max. ship size for existing terminals is ab. 155 000 m3, sizes in excess of 200 000 m3 has recently been ordered. These bigger sizes are limited to specific projects which involve either the construction of new terminals or the construction of offshore terminals ( Energy Bridge, SRV, etc.)

35 LNG Carriers Growth in the average capacity 36 Illustration of relative size of LNG carriers

37 Alternative propulsion system For the larger ship sizes, propulsion system has become an issue. The draft limitation makes it difficult to design an efficient propeller and hull form for a single screw vessel. This has led to the development of a twin-skeg, twin-screw propulsion arrangement as a design solution for maintaining normal trading speed ( ab. 20 kn). In turn, this has led the industry to look for alternative propulsion systems to the commonly used steam turbine plant. Systems considered are: Dual fuel diesel electric Twin slow speed diesel engines with reliquefaction of boil off gas Gas turbine Of these alternatives, the two first have already been selected for recent large size newbuilding orders. 38 Alternative propulsion system, cont. The main advantage of the diesel alternatives over steam turbine is the improvement in fuel efficiency. Diesel engines have 20 % better thermal efficiency compared to steam turbines. For a diesel LNGC with reliquefaction of BOG, this results in fuel saving of ab. 50 t HFO pr. day (24 h) for a Snøhvit size LNGC. In addition, a full cargo of LNG will be delivered (and paid for)!

39 Steam turbine FO Boiler BOG Advantages Low vibrations High proven reliability Low maintenance cost Dual fuel capability Low NOx emission R/G S/T Disadvantages Low fuel efficiency (ab 30 %) High CO2 emission Large engine room space Few makers Reduced number of skilled engineers 40 Dual Mode Gas/Diesel engines Advantages Environmentally friendly by using gas (no SO x, reduced NO x, reduced amount of particles) High redundancy of propulsion and power generating system Reduced total power installed due to flexibility in different operating modes Disadvantages High initial cost Reduced delivered cargo LNG used as fuel Require high quality fuel (LNG/MDO)

41 Slow speed diesel engines with re-liquefaction system (twin screw) FO Tank G BOG Cycle G C E C G N2 Cycle G FO Tank 42 Slow speed diesel engine with re-liquefaction plant Advantages High overall fuel efficiency Proven propulsion system with high level of reliability No loss of cargo 100% delivered to customer Lower initial cost Reduced CO 2 emission Disadvantages Slightly higher vibration compared to steam and diesel-electric propulsion Need separate auxiliary generators therefore high total installed power High NOx emission Single fuel capability High maintenance cost

43 Gas turbine & electric motors Advantages FO BOG Exh.gas MGO BOG Reduced engine room space Low level of vibration and noise Redundant propulsion Reduced maintenance Gas turbine Low NOx emission Boiler S/T Disadvantages Not used in LNGC yet R/G Motor High initial cost 44 Arctic Shipping

Shipping distances and unit cost 45