Risk Analysis and Exploration Economics. Dr. Alfred Kjemperud

Similar documents
CO 2 for EOR Norwegian Continental Shelf. Possibilities and Challenges

Reservoir Management

DIPLOMA IN PETROLEUM ECONOMICS

Figure 1 Petroleum resources in the NCS per (NPD 2016 b) Figure 2 NCS investment outlook (Norges Bank 2015)... 13

The China Sichuan Basin Case Study

PETROCONSULT ENERGY DIPLOMA PROGRAM (6 WEEKS)

Strategic Engineering of Large Infrastructure Systems: Real Options, Staged Development, and the Role of Flexibility

Who? Name: Jon Erik Bjore. Age: 49. Status: Married, 3 children. Living: Nesodden, Norway. Current Position: Global IT Manager, Statoil Exploration

Tertiary CO 2 EOR in 23 North Sea Oil Fields - Combined CO 2 Storage Based in Industrial Sources CO2

WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO PEAK OIL? Benedikt Unger, February 2015

Business Analysis Project

Assessing Policy Alternatives

Will the well find oil or gas? What is the chance factor? How much might it find? What is the reserve estimate? Near Carlsbad, NM Permian Basin

IMPROVED OIL RECOVERY GULLFAKS SØR STATFJORD EXPERTS IN TEAM TPG 4851 GULLFAKS VILLAGE GROUP 6

Economics & Technology of the Crude Oil, Natural Gas and LNG Value Chains. November 29-30, 2007

Philippines Case Study Sulu Sea and East Palawan Basins

Evaluation and Classification of Hydrocarbon Resources

Global Energy Outlook. Offshore Center Danmark Esbjerg Jon Fløgstad, Manager Nordic Oil & Gas Ernst & Young September 13 th, 2012

Guidelines for completing the reporting file

Extractives Sector Governance Over View of Global Practices

Fall Application Portfolio: East Coast Offshore Wind Farm Development. David Hwang ESD.71 Prof. Richard de Neufville

Mexico : An Emerging Opportunity. Cam Boulton, P. Eng McDaniel International Ltd. CGEF Conference World of Opportunity 2014

Let's get non-technical: An economist's take on the past, the present, and the future of the industry

SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program

For personal use only

Innkjøpskonferansen 2017 Hvordan endres anskaffelsesfunksjonen

Pareto Oil and Offshore Conference DNO ASA by Helge Eide Managing Director

Prof. Bryan Caplan Econ 812

The global energy arena

Flexible Gross Split Sharing A new fiscal model for the upstream petroleum industry May 15, 2017 Pedro van Meurs

Value of Flexibility in Irrigation Projects

Running out of and into oil: Analyzing global oil depletion to 2050

Class #23 & 24. Video Present Value and Discounting. A mini lecture: Present value. The efficient allocation of resources over time

STATOIL s view on R&D directions

For personal use only. AWE Limited. Asian Roadshow Presentation. June 2012

For personal use only

Full Circle (FC) Energy Ltd. Opportunistic Acquisition in a Proven Field

RNB2018 General Guidelines

Project Risk Management

Inclusive Growth in Mozambique: conference

Introduction Petroleum Exploration, Development and Production

Sacgasco Limited. ABN Unit 14, 210 Bagot Road, Subiaco, WA, T E

Methane emissions in Norwegian gas production. Th e 4 th session of th e UN E C E Gro up of Ex pert s o n G as

ASX Release NILDE AREA OIL PROJECT PROGRESS UPDATE HIGHLIGHTS. 21 April 2016

Responsible Mineral Development Initiative (RMDI)

PNGE 480 Petroleum Engineering Design

Oil & Gas Modeling Using CrystalBall

For personal use only

NORTHERN CROSS YUKON LIMITED LNG Charette

Solon Kassinis Director - Energy Service

P a n o r o E n e r g y A n n u A l S t A t E m E n t o f R E S E R v E S A P R i l

Completion report and next steps. Yemen - Petroleum governance Petroleum Governance Initiative funded Technical Assistance P TAS-TF057534

M.Sc. Agril. Economics

Norwegian Petroleum Policies State Secretary Anita Utseth

T&T s Petroleum Upstream Sector A view of the Next 50 years

Standardization of the Evaluation Criteria on Petroleum Resources

BARRIERS FOR MARGINAL FIELDS

21 st Metal Bulletin Bauxite and Alumina Conference

7. Gaining Insight. 1. Deterministic evaluation Sensitivity analysis Tornado diagrams

NEWS RELEASE. Centerra Gold Updates Reserves and Resources Gold Reserves Increase by 1.7 million ounces to 8.2 million Contained Ounces

Underground Coal Gasification an Alternative Clean Mining Method of the Future. Kevin Garner

Economics of Quality. Murray Cantor Senior Consultant, Cutter Consortium Israel Gat Fellow, Cutter Consortium

SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS)

Framing as a Marketing Tactic for Equipment Leasing

Competent Person s Report on the Ororo Field, OML95, Offshore Nigeria.

MIE HOLDINGS CORPORATION MI 能源控股有限公司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability)

DHI / AVO Analysis Best Practices: A Worldwide Analysis. Kurt W. Rudolph Exploration Company Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

For personal use only

Geological Storage of CO 2. Tor Fjaeran President Director, Statoil Indonesia

Chevron Australasia Overview

Economics ISSUE 3. Matters

Twilight of Big Energy

Overview of global crude oil reserve estimates and supply patterns. Professor Wumi Iledare LSU Center for Energy studies Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Analogs in Resource Assessment and Beyond

Oil & Gas (E&P) Business Development and Management Workshop Module 1 & 2 CEM06 Oil & Gas Consultancy Services & Technical Training Providers

Strategic Gaming. An Introduction to its Application in Oil & Gas and Energy

INCORPORATING CORE ANALYSIS DATA UNCERTAINTY IN ASSEST VALUE ASSESSMENT. Andre J. Bouchard and Matthew J. Fox Conoco Inc.

Use of Decision Tree and Risk Analysis as Aid of Decision Making(Case Study)

OECD TASK FORCE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEEA-CF REPORTING OF STOCKS OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN PHYSICAL UNITS

Planning Meetings & Events in Emerging Countries

For personal use only

Chevron Australia Overview

This is Reservoir Engineering COPYRIGHT. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Why the ETS will not succeed

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF TECHNICAL - ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY OF LTO DUKOVANY NPP

Beginning of the End? Oil Companies Cut Back on Spending

The Imperial Barrel Award Committee

Annual General Shareholders Meeting

Managing in the Current Environment; Mitigating Risks & Uncertainties to Maximise Upstream Returns

Copyright CEMEX Holdings Philippines, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Baisse «surprise» des prix du pétrole? du bon usage de modèles prospectifs hybrides

TSX-V: YO. September. Duvernay Shale Peters & Co. Energy Conference

Econ 366. Fall 2012 Energy Prices, Energy Booms, and the Macro Economy

RIU Good Oil Conference. David Casey, Managing Director

SHELL FLNG TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH AND INNOVATIVE APPLICATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES

For personal use only

Agricultural Solutions

Carbon pricing and the Paris Agreement

Transcription:

Risk Analysis and Exploration Economics Dr. Alfred Kjemperud

The Concept of Risk Risk = Uncertainty + Undesirable Consequences Risk = Downside potential at a certain Probability Level

Rent vs. Risk Most of the exploration possibilities are unsuccessful The Profit Margin for the Oil Companies must be large enough to accommodate failures

Risk- & Non Risk-Takers Fiscal Terms must account for the large Risk in the Oil Business Oil Companies are High Risk Takers Companies reduce risk by diversification Governments are Low Risk Takers Governments can reduce risk by introducing a Regressive tax system (Bonuses and Royalties)

Risk vs. Probability Risk Tranches 1.2 Increasing Level of Knowledge Increasing Level of Know ledge Probability 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Chance of success Chance of failure N o C K n o w l e d g 0 0.2 0.4 e 0.6 0.8 1 Increasing chance of Failure Increasing chance of Succ

Geological & Technical Risks Exploration Existence of Hydrocarbons Magnitude of Discovery Type of Hydrocarbon Development Technical Risk Reservoir Development

Other Risks Fiscal Changes in fiscal terms Economic Exploration and development costs Hydrocarbon prices Political

Profitability and the risk Technological uncertainty costs overruns in Norwegian Projects 1998 40 35 30 Change in CAPEX from PDO estimates to summer 1998 22% Billion NOK 25 20 15 10 5 60% 23% 20% 10% 8% 15% 0 Balder Varg Jotun Oseberg Sør Oseberg Øst Visund Åsgard Source: MIE

Political Risk Nationalisation Not illegal after international law Company gets compensation Policy and Rule Changes

Country Ratings 20 16 12 Norway Libya Namibia Russia 8 4 Indonesia Algeria Angola 0 Gabon Ri sk Fact or Congo

Oil Price - the only relevant Risk? The ROR for international Oil companies follows the oil price 40 30 35 25 30 25 20 % 20 15 15 10 10 5 Oil Price (USD/bbl) Pare of Return % 5 0 0 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 Years (from Energy Information Administration, USA)

Risk Management Risk Avoidance Avoid opportunities with to large risk Loss Prevention Understand and analyse the risk to prevent loss Risk Transfer Farmouts, Joint Ventures, Diversification Insurance Price dependant on risk E.g. MIGA» Currency Transfer» Expropriation» Breach of Contract» War and Civil Disturbance

Decisions under Uncertainty The Consequences of a Decisio is only unfolded in the uncertain Future Decision Analysis Methods are tools for manoeuvring in normal Business Environment

Decision Process 1. Understand Alternatives and the risk these alternatives involve 2. Evaluate the potential Consequence perceived in the Situation 3. Assess the uncertainties involved in the Decision 4. Recombining the judgements to develop a consistent Strategy

Risk Analysis Methods Technical estimates of volume and production Technical Risk Analysis Political Risk Analysis Discounted Cash Flow Analysis No EMV Analysis Invest or Not? Yes Utility Theory Gamblers Ruin Theory How Much?

Expected Monetary Value EMV=(R*POS)-(RC*(1-POS)) EMV=Expected Monetary Value R = Reward = Net Present Value (NPV) POS= Probability of Success RC= Risk Capital = Bonuses, Dry Hole Cost, G&G etc.

Total Success Probability POS = P expl. * P dev. *P fiscal *P pol. * P econ. Example: POS = 0.5*0.9*1.0*0.8*0.6 POS = 0.22

Geological risking

1000 100 10 1 0,1 Geological risk 0,1 1 10 100 1000 Size of discovery From NPD Expected size before licensing (mil Sm³ o.e.)

POS (Geological risk only) Probability of success = 0.50 This is the typical probability of success of a step out or delineation well, or of an adjoining structure Probability of success = 0.20-0.30 This is the typical range of probability of success of exploration in an area with many similar plays and structures and for and exploration well which is in such a structure not too far from existing discoveries Probability of success = 0.10-0.20 This is the typical range of probability of success of exploration in a well explored area with a variety of different plays and on a new location Probability of success = 0.02-0.05 This is the typical range of probability of success of exploration in a poorly explored area or a new geological basin in which previously no wells have been drilled or only dry holes have been drilled

EMV - Example Assumptions NPV = 120 million USD RC = 15 million USD POS = 22% EMV = (R*POS) - (RC*(1-POS)) EMV = (120*0.22) - (15*(1-0.22)) EMV = 26.4 11.7 EMV = 14.7million USD Break-even POS = RC/(NPV+RC) Break-even POS = 15/(120+15) Break even POS = 11.1% (EMV=0)

Success Capacity How many dry wells can a discovery carry? Success Capacity = (1/break-even success ratio) - 1 Example: Success Capacity = (1/0.111) - 1 Success Capacity = 8 One success well can carry 8 dry wells and still have a positive NPV

EMV curve 140 Reward (NPV) 120 EMV curve 100 80 Calculated EMV Million USD 60 40 20 0 Break even POS Calculated POS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100-20 -40 Risk capital Probability of Success (%)

EMV example Capital POS EMV Outcome 1 120 22.0 % 26.4 1-POS -15 78.0 % -11.7 Total EMV 14.7 Break-even POS 11.1 % Success Capacity 8.0

EMV Exercise

Two outcome decision tree POS = 0.22 Discovery NPV = 120 MM$ EMV = 26.4 MM$ Drill EMV=14.7 MM$ 1-POS = 0.78 Dry hole RC= -15 MM$ EMV=-11.5 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $

An expanded tree Capital POS EMV Outcome 1 240 5.0 % 12 Outcome 2 120 7.0 % 8.4 Outcome 3 60 10.0 % 6 Total Capital 120 22.0 % 1-POS -15 78.0 % -11.7 Total EMV 14.7

Multi outcome decision tree POS = 0.05 Large Discovery Drill EMV=14.7 MM$ NPV1 = 240 MM$ EMV1 = 12 MM$ POS = 0.07 Med. Discovery NPV2 = 120 MM$ EMV2 = 8.7 MM$ POS = 0.10 Small Discovery NPV3 = 60 MM$ EMV3= -6 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $ 1-POS = 0.78 Dry hole RC = -15 MM$ EMV= -11.5 Total EMV = 14.7

Analyzing Political Risk Capital POS EMV Discovery and moderate unrest 100 5.0 % 5.0 Discovery and large unrest 40 7.0 % 2.8 Expropriation during production -60 10.0 % -6.0 Unsuccessful Exploration -15 78.0 % -11.7 Total EMV -9.9

Gambler Ruin Analysis Gamblers ruin occurs when a risk taker with a limited funds goes bankrupt due to continous failures Will the company survive if worse come to Technical estimates of Technical Risk Analysis worse volume and production Political Risk Analysis Discounted Cash Flow Analysis No EMV Analysis Invest or Not? Yes Utility Theory Gamblers Ruin Theory How Much?

Probability of one success What number of wells would be needed to be sure of at least one discovery at a certain confidence level The probability of at least one success = 1 - the probability of all failures CL = 1-(1-POS) n CL = Desired confidence level POS = Success probability 1-POS = probability of failure n = No. of Exploration wells

Combined Probability of Success 100.0 % 90.0 % 80.0 % 70.0 % Combined POS 60.0 % 50.0 % 40.0 % 30.0 % 20.0 % 5 % 10 % 15 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 10.0 % 0.0 % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Number of wells

Utility Theory 140 Reward (NPV) 120 100 EMV curve Utility curve Million USD 80 60 40 20 0 Break even SP 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Technical estimates of Technical Risk Analysis volume and production Political Risk Analysis Discounted Cash Flow Analysis -20-40 Risk capital Probability of Success (%) Utility Break even SP No EMV Analysis Invest or Not? Yes Utility Theory Gamblers Ruin Theory How Much?

EMV Exercise An oil company have mapped a prospect and concluded that the resources may be as high as 100 million barrels and the probability of success is estimated to 10%. The data acquired, the interpretations and the cost of the exploration well will amount to 20 million USD. If a discovery is made, the NPV will be 90 million USD. Calculate the expected monetary value. Find the break even POS Will you recommend this project to your Management? The company decides to shoot a 3D seismic survey before the first well. The budget for the survey is 5 million. The structure is confirmed and estimated even bigger than before and the geologists now estimates the POS to 20% and the economists calculate an NPV of 120 million USD What is the new EMV? Was the decision to shoot the 3D correct? How many dry wells can be drilled for the project to still be positive if a discovery is made?

Exercise B Capital POS EMV Outcome 1 90 10.0 % 9 1-POS -20 90.0 % -18 Total EMV -9.0 Break-even POS 16.7 % Sucess Capacity 5.0 Capital POS EMV Outcome 1 120 20.0 % 24 1-POS -25 80.0 % -20 Total EMV 4.0 Break-even POS 17.2 % Sucess Capacity 4.8

EMV Exercise without 3D POS = 0.10 Discovery NPV = 90 MM$ EMV = 9 MM$ Drill EMV=-9 MM$ 1-POS = 0.90 Dry hole RC= -20 MM$ EMV=-18 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $

EMV Exercise with 3D POS = 0.20 Discovery NPV = 120 MM$ EMV = 24 MM$ Drill EMV=4 MM$ 1-POS = 0.80 Dry hole RC= -25 MM$ EMV=-20 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $

Multi outcome exercise An oil company has analyzed a prospect and have concluded that there may be three possible outcomes with related probabilities as given to the right in million usd The exploration cost is calculated to be 20 million usd Capital POS Outcome 1 150 5.0 % Outcome 2 100 10.0 % Outcome 3 50 10.0 % Draw a multi branch decision tree which illustrates all outcomes Collapse the multi branch tree into a two branch tree and draw an illustration

Multi outcome exercise Capital POS EMV Outcome 1 150 5.0 % 7.5 Outcome 2 100 10.0 % 10 Outcome 3 50 10.0 % 5 Total Capital 90 25.0 % 1-POS -20 75.0 % -15 Total EMV 7.5 Break-even POS 11.8 % Success Capacity 7.5

Multi outcome exercise POS = 0.05 Large Discovery Drill EMV=7.5 MM$ NPV1 = 150 MM$ EMV1 = 7.5 MM$ POS = 0.10 Med. Discovery NPV2 = 100 MM$ EMV2 = 10 MM$ POS = 0.10 Small Discovery NPV3 = 50 MM$ EMV3= 5 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $ 1-POS = 0.75 Dry hole RC = -20 MM$ EMV= -15 Total EMV = 7.5

Collapsed multi-branched tree POS = 0.25 Discovery NPV = 90 MM$ EMV = 22.5 MM$ Drill EMV=7.5 MM$ 1-POS = 0.75 Dry hole RC= -20 MM$ EMV=-15 MM$ Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $ Capital POS EMV Total Capital 90 25.0 % 22.5 1-POS -20 75.0 % -15 Total EMV 7.5

Two outcome decision tree POS = Discovery NPV = EMV = 24 EMV= Drill 1-POS = Dry hole RC= EMV= Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $

Multi-branch decision tree POS = Large Discovery EMV= Drill NPV1 = EMV1 = POS = Med. Discovery NPV2 = EMV2 = POS = 0. Small Discovery NPV3 = EMV3= Chance node Decision node Don t drill 0 $ 1-POS = Dry hole RC = EMV= Total EMV = 7.5