LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY

Similar documents
Technical Memorandum No. 8 June 3, 2013 Page 2. FEMA Floodplain Mapping Flood Elevations at WWTP

June 22, Francis E. Borcalli, P.E.

Summary ECONOMIC STUDIES

Prepared for: City of Jeffersonville. November Prepared by

Bridge Replacement Project. Preliminary Hydraulic Study. Lincoln, California BRLS-5089 (021) BRIDGE 19C Mcbean Park Drive at Auburn Ravine

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

PA of NY&NJ - TETERBORO AIRPORT RUNWAY 6-24 Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) UNSTEADY-STATE FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS

Manhattan Levee Section 216 Feasibility Study Public Workshop 17Apr13 Manhattan Kansas

John Remus Assessment of Conceptual Nonstructural Alternative

Hey and Associates, Inc.

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Rahway River Basin Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

DRAFT FOREST VIEW, ILLINOIS SECTION 205 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

LOWER BOISE RIVER INTERIM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Dam Safety & Planning: Examples of Collaboration and Lessons Learned

Chicago Waterways Tail Water Conditions Modeling

RE: Recommendations for Staged Implementation of Alternative 3a

PEARCE CREEK CONFINED DISPOSAL AREA MODIFICATION

Appendix C, Attachment 4 June 11, Diversion Channel Outlet Hydraulic Modeling RAS and ADH

CITY OF ANGLETON MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN PHASE I EVALUATION & PRELIMINARY REPORT

Presentation Overview

Appendix K Civil Engineering

Skagit River Flood Damage Reduction Study

FEMA/USACE Coordination Plan

Scope of Work Lower Arroyo Grande Creek Flooding Analysis

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE

Westminster East Garden Grove, California Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Feasibility Study. Presentation for. City Engineers Association of Minnesota

NEPA Scoping Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

Technical Memorandum No River Geometry

The Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana

BLACK HAWK COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Lower San Joaquin Feasibility Study Environmental Impact Report/ Supplemental Environmental Impacts Statement

CLAY STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

US Army Corps of Engineers

Hydrology and Flooding

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION REPORT APPENDIX C HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS

RECORD OF DECISION MAY RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

Modeling a Complex Hydraulic Environment Using a 1-D Approach Supplemented with Simple 2-D Principles Manas Borah Ed Dickson June 5, 2014

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, CITY OF WOODLAND AND VICINITY, CA

UPRR criteria for sizing waterway openings under bridges and through culverts are as follows:

APPENDIX A HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

Sacramento River General Reevaluation Report

Pilot Study for Storage Requirements for Low Flow Augmentation

IAFSM 2010 Annual Conference. City of Rockford Keith Creek Greenway Flood Mitigation Project

Computer Determination of Flow Through Bridges

CHAPTER 3 FLOOD RELATED STUDIES

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

LEVEE DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SUTTER COUNTY

Preliminary Feasibility Study for South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Economic Impact Areas 1-10 Executive Summary

Characterizing the Soap Lake Floodplain CHAPTER 2

DRAFT. Technical Memorandum. Whitney Road Drainage & Safety Enhancements Phase III Hydraulic Update. Prepared For:

Prairie Creek and Tributaries, Russellville, Arkansas

FINDINGS: Olsson used a three-step analysis strategy to develop a benefit cost ratio that would indicate the relative feasibility of this project.

Analyzing Flood Risk from the I&M Canal s Non-Levee Embankments A Modified Application of FEMA s Natural Valley Procedure

PROJECT REVIEW PLAN TOPEKA, KANSAS FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PHASE

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report

Section 6: Stormwater Improvements

Alternative Approaches to Water Resource System Simulation

Technical Memorandum. Hydraulic Analysis Smith House Flood Stages. 1.0 Introduction

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Background Watershed Description Hydrology - HEC-HMS Models Hydraulics - HEC-RAS Models...

Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Modeling Strategy

Southeast Policy Area Drainage Study

Environmental Protection (NJDEP) The Louis Berger Group, Inc.

Engineering Report Preliminary Floodplain Study. Executive Summary

TRUCKEE MEADOWS FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, NEVADA

DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Prepared by Battelle Memorial Institute

Simulation of Daily Streamflow

Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM

Conceptual Design and Feasibility of a Natural Fishway at the Fremont BART Weir, Alameda Creek, California

3.3 Acceptable Downstream Conditions

Hydrostatistics Principles of Application

Pajaro River Watershed Flood Prevention Authority. Phase 3 and 4a. Pajaro River Watershed Study

Hypothetical Flood Computation for a Stream System

Hackensack River Flood Reduction Study Update

PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS

DRAINAGE REPORT. Project Name: PG&E Gas Operations Technical Training Center Winters, CA. Date: February 4, Prepared by: BKF Engineers

Flood Mitigation Plan

DRAINAGE STUDY CROWS LANDING INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK. Stanislaus County. Prepared by:

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

APPENDIX E PLAN FORMULATION APPENDIX

Marysville Levee Commission

Dallas Floodway Improvements

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Dam Failure Analysis. Olivotti Lake Dam. Houle Enterprises, LLC. (Final) Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Lincoln County, Wisconsin. Report prepared for

Location Hydraulic Study Alisal Creek Bridge at Hartnell Road State Bridge Number 44C0110 County Bridge Number 209

Project Drainage Report

Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations for Groundwater Recharge Prado Dam

Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan (UMRCP) October 05

Community Technical Group Meeting 7. Wednesday, Feb. 24, 2016

By Roger Churchwell San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency.

Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Flood Risk Management Project

Lower American River Task Force Briefing. 10 March 2009

Case Studies in Hazard Class Reductions Implementation of NY s Guidance for Dam Hazard Classification

Alternatives for Willow Creek Flood Mitigation Study

Tribal Partnership Program Jamestown S Klallam Tribe and USACE Dungeness River in Washington State

Appendix E. Civil Design and Cost Engineering

APPENDIX M MITIGATION STRATEGY For WESTMINSTER, EAST GARDEN GROVE FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STUDY

Transcription:

Background LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993 Reconnaissance Study completed June 1994 Feasibility Cost Share Agreement signed January 2000 $2.5M Study Sponsors The Reclamation Board City of Woodland

Study Area

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Study Purpose: Define flood related problems and opportunities, evaluate a full range of alternatives, and recommend a plan to reduce potential flood risk within the City of Woodland and the unincorporated areas of Yolo County. Study Scope Establish specific objectives of a plan to reduce flood damages and protect related environmental resources. Inventory and forecast conditions in the study area. Define criteria and constraints for formulating and evaluating alternatives. Formulate alternatives to reduce flood damages and protect related environmental resources. Compare alternative plans and identify recommended plan.

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Topographical Surveying Tasks Completed To Date Baseline Geotechnical Analysis Hydrologic Model and Frequency Curves Environmental Site Assessment (Hazardous Waste) Hydrology &Hydraulic Without Project Modeling (10/00) Floodplain Mapping

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Discussion Points Sacramento District is Committed to Meeting Project Schedule WRDA 2002 Authorization City of Woodland s Economic Viability Timeliness of Appropriation for New Construction Continuing Federal Support and Appropriation of Funds

Survey & Mapping Completed August 2000 by Corps Photogrammetric & Ground Control 2 Contours Datum: NAVD 88 More Detailed than Reconnaissance Report

Hydrology Developed by Corps with HEC-1 Return Period (years) Peak Flow (cfs) 50 yr 53,290 100 yr 63,603 200 yr 70,085 500 yr 78,595 No significant changes compared to Reconnaissance Study

Hydraulics UNET - Unsteady, One-Dimensional Flow FLO2D - Unsteady, Two-Dimensional Flow HEC-RAS - Steady, One-Dimensional Flow

Existing Cache Creek Levee Design Original Design: 30,000 cfs 3 freeboard 10-year protection

Peak Rainflood Frequency Curve Cache Creek at Rd. 94B

Non-Damaging Flow Geotechnical Risk-Based Analysis Probable Non-Failure Point (PNP) @ 2 Below Top of Levee Probable Failure Point (PFP) @ Top of Levee Calculated Flow Below PNP, and Does Not Overtop Existing Bank (30,000 cfs @ Yolo; 34,000 cfs @ Rd. 94B)

N 65 DRAFT LIMIT OF 8,100 cfs " 85 90 STUDY 80 75 70 90 Road 17 Yolo ÑÑÑÑ Ñ Ñ Ñ ÑÑÑ Ñ " 85 16,000 cfs Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ Ñ ÑÑ ÑÑ ÑÑ ÑÑ 80 " 7,000 cfs (LF) 75 70 65 Interstate 5 70 LIMIT OF STUDY 60 9,100 cfs (LF) " " 10,700 cfs (LF) Union Pacif ic Ra ilr oad 55 55 H ighw ay 113 R oad 100 50 Cache Creek ± Road 101 Bes t Ranch Rd. Road 18C R oa d 1 02 " Water Surface Elevation Contours Approximate Extent of Overbank Flooding, Existing Conditions Peak Flow R oad 94B Kentuck y Av e. Road 98 Road 99 W. M ain Street Woodland E. M ain Street Cache Creek Settling Basin Yolo Bypass H ighw ay 113 Legend (LF) Levee Failure 65 60 55 45 40 Highw ay 16 I nterstate 5 35 Road 24 W. G ibs on Rd. E. Gibs on Rd. Vert ical Dat um: NAVD 88 Cache Creek Hydraulic Study Existing Conditions 200-Year Flood Event 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet LIMIT OF STUDY

Economic Damages Analysis Table 8 500-year Floodplain Structure Values ($1,000s) (October 2000 Price Levels) Lower Cache Creek Study Main Reach Total SFR Struct $289,205 $289,205 MFR Struct $21,283 $21,283 Office Struct $10,852 $10,852 Retail Struct $33,403 $33,403 Restaurant $5,377 $5,377 Service Struct $1,150 $1,150 Public Struct $18,377 $18,377 Industrial $354,803 $354,803 Total $734,450 $734,450

Economic Damages Analysis Table 9 Without Project Conditions Expected Annual Damages (Base Year Conditions) (In $1,000s) Lower Cache Creek Main Reach Total Aggregated Structures & Contents $12,313 $12,313 Total $12,313 $12,313

Environmental Analysis Status of work. Land-use constraints. Endangered species and conservation programs.

Plan Formulation and Evaluation Process Define specific objectives to reduce flood damages. Define criteria and constraints for formulating and evaluating alternatives. Identify and assess potential measures to reduce flood damages. Evaluate and screen preliminary alternatives. Evaluate and screen selected alternatives to identify the NED and the LPP plans.

Planning Objectives Provide a minimum of 100-year flood protection to the City of Woodland from flooding from Cache Creek. Maximize the use of existing flood reduction facilities prior to constructing new facilities.

Planning Constraints Plans will be formulated according to Congressional direction, current applicable laws, regulations, and policies. Plans will be formulated according to the Federal objective of water and related land resource planning. Minimize the operation and maintenance requirements and associated costs of the flood reduction system. Minimize impacts to agricultural lands and to lands adjacent to Cache Creek.

Planning Criteria Completeness is the extent to which a given alternative plan provides and accounts for all necessary investments or other actions to ensure the realization of the planning objectives. Effectiveness is the extent to which an alternative plan alleviates the identified problems and achieves the planning objectives. Efficiency is primarily a measure of the planning objectives. It is a measure of the extent to which an alternative plan is the most costeffective means of alleviating identified flood problems. Acceptability is the workability and viability of the alternative plans with other Federal agencies, affected State and local agencies, and public entities given existing laws, regulations, and public policies.

Initial Screening Nonstructural Raise/flood proof structures Relocate structures Flood Warning System Structural Storage Channelization Levees/set-back levees Flood bypass

Preliminary Alternatives Clearing and grubbing Raise levees Channelization and raise levees Set-back levees Lower Cache Creek Overflow Barrier

N RD 17 500 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 1 plan view map] RD 94B I-5 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR YOLO 550 450 350 300 750 RD 18B RD 97A HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 RD 18 RD 99 RD 99E RD 18A RD 100B RD 18B RD 18C RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 1 0 1 Miles 700 650 600 400 LEGEND Cache Creek Existing Project Levee Limits of Clearing and Grubbing HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WO ODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 1 CHANNEL CLEARING AND GRUBBING SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

Preliminary Alternative 1: Channel Clearing and Grubbing Primary Features Clear and grub channel approximately 9.3 miles No bridge replacements Riprap protection Accomplishments Increase level of protection from 10 to 40 years Environmental Impacts Significant removal of valuable riparian habitat Mitigation very difficult

N I-5 RD 94B 750 500 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 2 plan view map] 700 RD 17 650 RD 18B RD 97A YOLO 550 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 450 RD 99E 400 RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 350 RD 18A RD 100B 300 RD 18B RD 18C KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 1 0 1 Miles LEGEND Cache Creek Existing Project Levee Raise Project Levee Construct New Levee HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 2 RAISE EXISTING LEVEE & CONSTRUCT NEW LEVEE SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

Preliminary Alternative 2: Raise Levees Primary Features Raise existing levees 1 to 14 feet for 9.3 miles Replace bridges: I-5, Road 99W, Railroad, 113, Road 102 Riprap protection Accomplishments 200-year level of protection Environmental Impacts Removal of valuable riparian habitat Mitigation very difficult

N I-5 RD 94B 750 500 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 3 plan view map] 700 RD 17 650 RD 18B RD 97A YOLO 550 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 450 RD 99E 400 RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 350 RD 18A RD 100B 300 RD 18B RD 18C KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 1 0 1 Miles LEGEND Cache Creek Existing Project Levee Construct New Levee HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 3 IMPROVE CHANNEL AND CONSTRUCT NEW LEVEES SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

Preliminary Alternative 3: Channelization and Levee Raising Primary Features Approximately 9.3 miles of bench channel to 2-year flow channel 500 to 700-foot terraces at the 2-year water surface elevation Construct new levees on one side to existing heights Replace bridges: Railroad bridge Riprap protection Accomplishments 200-year level of protection Environmental Impacts Removal of agricultural lands Significant removal of valuable riparian habitat (temporary) Potential for on-site mitigation

N I-5 RD 94B 750 500 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 4 plan view map] 700 RD 17 650 RD 18B RD 97A YOLO 550 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 450 RD 99E 400 RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 350 RD 18A RD 100B 300 RD 18B RD 18C KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 1 0 1 Miles LEGEND Cache Creek Existi ng Project Levee Raise Exi sting Project Levee Construct New Levee Proposed 1000' Setback HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 4 CONSTRUCT SETBACK LEVEES SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

Preliminary Alternative 4: Setback Levees Primary Features Approximately 9.3 miles of set-back levees on one side or other 1 to 14 feet high Raise levees on other side, if necessary, from 1 to 7 feet high Replace bridges: Railroad bridge Riprap protection Accomplishments 200-year level of protection Environmental Impacts Removal of agricultural lands Removal of valuable riparian habitat near bridges Potential for on-site mitigation

N I-5 RD 94B 750 500 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 5 plan view map] 700 RD 17 650 RD 18B RD 97A YOLO 550 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 450 RD 99E 400 RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 350 RD 18A RD 100B 300 RD 18B RD 18C KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 1 0 1 Miles LEGEND Cache Creek Existing Project Levee Const ruct New Levee HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 5 LOWER CACHE CREEK OVERFLOW BARRIER SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

N I-5 RD 17 YOLO 550 500 450 350 300 1 0 1 Miles RD 94B 750 700 650 RD 18B RD 97A 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 RD 99E 400 RD 18A RD 100B RD 18B RD 18C RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 LEGEND Cache Creek Lower Cache Creek Overflow Barrier 200-Yr Floodplain, Pre-project 200-Yr Floodplain, Post-project HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 5 200-YEAR PRE- AND POST-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

N YOLO 9,100 9,100! LF LF 1 0 1 Miles 8,100 8,100!! 16,000 16,000 LF! 7,000 7,000! 15,300 15,900! 10,700 10,700 2,600 2,900!! 2,300 3,000 800 9,700!! 17,900 32,400 N/A 40,100! LEGEND Existi ng Pro ject! LF Cache Creek Lower Cache Creek Overflow Barrier 200-Yr Floodplain, Pre-Project 200-Yr Floodplain, Post-Project Peak Flow (CFS) Levee Failure! 11,200 N/A CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN WOODLAND! 20,300 N/A LOWER CACHE CREEK, W OODLAND, CAL IFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative (200-YEAR) Existing Conditions Vs. North Woodland Overflow Barrier SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CO RPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

N 6 HWY 113 14 ROAD 102 Depth (ft) 6 5 4 3 2 5 4 8 [PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVE 3 5 plan view map with 6 pre- 2 and post- hydrographs] 4 ROAD 98 Depth (ft) 1 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 Time (hrs) Depth (ft) # # # # 12 10 2 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 Time (hrs) 1 0 1 Miles LEGEND Cache Creek Existing Conditions With North Woodland Overflow Barrier 200-Yr Floodplain, Pre-proj ect 200-Yr Floodplain, Post-project 1 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 Time (hrs) 8 7 6 I-5 8 7 6 I-5 Depth (ft) 5 4 3 Depth (ft) 5 4 3 # 2 2 1 1 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 Time (hrs) 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 Time (hrs) LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternatives 5 200-YEAR PRE- AND POST-PROJECT FLOODPLAIN HYDROGRAPHS SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

N I-5 RD 17 YOLO 550 500 1 0 1 Miles RD 94B 750 700 650 RD 18B RD 97A 600 HWY 16 RD 19A RD 98 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN RR RD 18 RD 99 450 RD 99E 400 RD 99 HWY 113 RD 101 RD 102 350 RD 18A RD 100B 300 RD 18B RD 18C KENTUCKY AVE KENTUCKY AVE 250 LEGEND Cache Creek Lower Cache Creek OverFlow Barrier Water Depth Contours 10-Yr Floodplain HWY 16 MAIN ST WOODLAND HWY 113 MAIN ST CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN I-5 RD 24 GIBSON RD GIBSON RD LOWER CACHE CREEK, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA AREA FEASIBILITY Preliminary Alternative 5 10-Year Post-Project Floodplain SACRAMENTO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEBRUARY 2001

Preliminary Alternative 5: Lower Cache Creek Overflow Barrier Primary Features Approximately 6.7 miles of new levee from County Road 96 to the Settling Basin west levee from 4 to 17 feet high. Internal drainage canal on water side Flood warning system Removal of a portion of Settling Basin west levee Accomplishments 200-year level of protection for Woodland Alleviate flooding of Northern California Railroad and Interstate 5 south of flood barrier Environmental Impacts Minimal impacts to agricultural lands and the environment

Ranking of Preliminary Alternatives Ranking 1 Preliminary Alternative Lower Cache Creek Overflow Barrier 2 Setback Levees Comparative Cost Investment Cost Annual Cost Environmental Impact Effectiveness Acceptability $27,707,000 $2,028,000 Minimal Excellent High $36,457,000 to $45,615,000 $2,668,000 to $3,339,000 Moderate Good Moderate 3 Channelization $69,201,000 $5,063,000 Extensive Moderate Poor 4 Raise Levees $81,139,000 $5,937,000 Extensive Moderate Poor 5 Clearing & Grubbing $37,383,000 $2,945,000 Extensive Unacceptable Unacceptable

Key Issues Existing project Erosion sites--future operation and maintenance Raising existing weir--future operation Removing west levee of settling basin Real estate takings in floodway only for lands significantly impacted Bridge and road impacts--state highways, county roads, and railroads Mercury load

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility Study Milestones January 20,2000 May 23, 2000 March 26,2001 July 2001 December 2001 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 June 2002 Project Milestones Feasibility Cost share Agreement Signed Public Workshop F3 Conference (without project condition) Determination of Selected Plan Draft Feasibility Report w/eis/eir for Public Review Final Feasibility Report w/eis/eir Final Public Meeting Division Engineer s Notice Chief of Engineer s Report to OMB to Achieve Conditional Authorization in WRDA 2002

LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY WOODLAND AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY Project Milestones Design and Construction Milestones October 2002 March 2005 November 2007 Execute Design Agreement and Initiate Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) Award Construction Contract Complete Construction

Conclusions/Concurrences Detailed analysis of overflow barrier and set-back levee alternatives