Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Similar documents
Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

COW HERD REPLACEMENT. John Dhuyvetter NCREC NDSU Extension

REPLACEMENT HEIFER DEVELOPMENT & NUTRITION

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

Relationship of Cow Size, Requirements, and Production Issues. Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Traits and Tools for Retention and Replacement of Females

Heifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1

EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

2015 Producer Survey Results

Beef Cattle Management Update

Pregnancy Rates. Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University. !I am not an economist and I do not. ! Biology and interactions

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

Classes of Livestock. Numbers to Remember. Crude Protein. Nutrition for the Cow-calf. Factors influencing Requirements

Management Decisions. Management Decisions. Tradition. Legacy. ReproGene /3/2018. Jared Decker, University of Missouri 1

Relationship of Cow Size, Cow Requirements, and Production Issues

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

Crossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer Alison Van Eenennaam, University of California, Davis

Selecting the Right Replacement. Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

EPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

2/15/2016 TURTLE ROCK ANGUS Jeff & Lisa Liston Lovilia, IA c: Efficiency for Feed, Functi

Evaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture

Reproduction is the single most important factor associated with the economic success of the cow/calf producer

Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXI December 1, 2 and , Casper, WY. Integrating Information into Selection. Loren Berger.

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

Effective Use Of EPDs. Presented to: Minnesota Beef Producers Presented by: Kris A. Ringwall, Ph. D. NDSU Extension Beef Specialist

MO Farm Bureau Summer Commodity Conference. Feeding Cattle in a Drought Year

Heifer rearing cost: Critical control points

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Mike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14

EPDs and Reasonable Expectations in Commercial Crossbred Operations

How to select, grow, and manage replacement heifers W.A. Zollinger and J.B. Carr

Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

USING GENOMICS TO AFFECT COW HERD REPRODUCTION. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

Heifer Development Goals

B eef Cattle Management Update

SELECTION FOR IMPROVED FEED EFFICIENCY: A GENOMICS APPROACH. Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

Beef Production and the Brahman-Influenced Cow in the Southeast

Creating Premium Beef Maximizing Dairy Profit

LOW INPUT, HIGH OUTPUT MANAGEMENT Issue 6 PRACTICES FOR BEEF COW/CALF HERDS June 1990

Crossbreeding trials with Fleckvieh. Dr. Carel Muller Western Cape Dept. of Agriculture, Institute for Animal Production, Elsenburg, South Africa

Objectives. Economic Comparison of Conventional vs. Intensive Heifer Rearing Systems. Problems with the Historical Approach to Rearing Calves

Outline. Heifers selection. Selection. Maternal Traits. Range Beef Cow Symposium, Dec. 3-5, /5/13. rangebeefcow.com 1

Understanding EPDs and Accuracies

Ma# Spangler Sept. 8, 2016

Beef Cattle Management

CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS FOR ARIZONA RANGELANDS

Montgomery County Beef Improvement Association Members

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XVIII December 9, 10, 11, 2003, Mitchell Nebraska

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Section 5: Production Management

Beef Sire Selection for Cattle Genetic Improvement Program (Updated February 19, 2014)

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

A Refresher Course on Finishing Cattle in Tennessee. Genetics, Quality and Efficient Production for Marketing

Beef Cattle Handbook

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Effects of Feeding Perennial Peanut Hay on Growth, Development, Attainment of Puberty, and Fertility in Beef Replacement Heifers

Benchmark Angus. Engineering Superior Beef

Understanding and Utilizing EPDs to Select Bulls

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Forage Seminar Cut Bank, MT - December 16, 2014

NO!!! Making the Most of Winter Forages. Replacements are Up, Cow Slaughter is Down. The Profit Equation Variables. Hay Ground is Disappearing

Beef Cattle Energetics

Todd Thri(, University of Florida

Common $ense Heifer Management

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

Breeding for Carcass Improvement

MAKING COWS OUT OF HEIFERS BY DR. PATSY HOUGHTON GENERAL MANAGER HEARTLAND CATTLE COMPANY

CHARACTERIZATION OF HEREFORD AND TWO-BREED ROTATIONAL CROSSES OF HEREFORD W ANGUS AND SIMMENTAL CAllLE: CALF PRODUCTION THROUGH WEANING

Overview. Initial Research. Overview. Initial Research. Initial Research. Adapting Angus Cattle to Subtropical Climates 10/28/2015

Choices in Breeding Programs to Fit Your Environment

9/3/11. Joplin/newsroom.html. Implications of nutritional management for beef cow/calf systems

Crossbreeding Systems for Arizona Rangelands

Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences

She is weaned! Now what? Fernando Soberon, PhD Technical Service Manager Shur-Gain U.S.A.

Nichols Farms. Angus. Private Treaty Bull Sale 65 Years of. Superior Beef Genetics 4/25/18

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

We are in the bull business

Transcription:

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk July 13 th, 2015

Every complex problem has a simple solution, and it s usually wrong. Author unknown

The Optimum Beef Cow The never-ending cow size argument Longevity argument The goal would be modest size cows with high reproductive rates and low input costs which produce high-value calves. Scott Greiner, VA Tech Pounds weaned per pound of cow Per unit of energy consumed

Then this is profitability Return to labor? Return to estrus?

The Optimum Beef Cow What about Milk? What does a pound of mature size cost? What does a pound of Milk EPD cost? MARC- Energy use is less effective in higher milking cows. Are we ever going to truly understand cow efficiency given the grasses and management variability? Is Milk EPD a part of cow efficiency research?

EPDs: The Bell Curve EPDs only predict this: Accuracy is our confidence level that this is true.

Things to think about Milk EPD is the genetically unexplainable portion of Weaning Weight has very little to do with the white stuff that comes out of the udder! Could we figure it differently? Should BCS be part of a $Index? The correlation of Milk EPD to BW and WW is weak and negative (-.14 & -.16) Can we effectively reduce Milk via selection without negative impact on growth?

Angus Genetic Trends 120 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 -40-60 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 $F $B RADG FI 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-0.1

Changes to $F and $B December 5, 2014 EPD release included: Updated economic assumptions on all indexes 3-year rolling average Incorporation of Dry Matter Intake into $F and $B

Dry Matter Intake (DMI) EPD Measured in pounds of feed per day

Metabolic Wt VS. Live Wt Live Weight Metabolic Weight Animal Unit Equivalent (% of 1,000lbs. 1,000 178 100% 100 1,200 204 115% 87 1,400 229 129% 78 1,600 253 142% 70 Equivalent Herd Size (Baseline: 100 1,000lb cows Kleiber s Theory: Metabolic Weight = Live Weight.75 (1932)

Maintenance Energy Requirements Cow A 1,100 lbs. Low Milk potential Total lbs. TDN/cow/yr 3,726 Total lbs. forage/cow/yr 6,774 396lbs. calf (36%) Cow B 1,100 lbs. High Milk potential Total lbs. TDN/cow/yr 4,159 Total lbs. forage/cow/yr 7,561 +787lbs. Forage/year $75/ton = $30/yr $200/ton = $90/yr 495lbs. Calf (45%)

Maintenance Energy Requirements If you had 100 high milking cows 756,100lbs. of forage annually If you had lower milking cows 756,100lbs. / 6774lbs. intake = 111 cows 106 (396lb.) calves 95 (495lb.) calves 41,976 @ $3.05 47,025 @ $2.85 $128,027 $134,021 -$5,994 (+ var. costs, depreciation, labor)

Show me the money 165,000 cow database 12 additional Megacalories/year (ME EPD) = +3 pounds of weaning weight Weaning Weight WINS every year since 1975 by at least $2.50/hd Corn & calves adjusted for inflation Bigger cows use energy more efficiently 1200lb cow weighs 20% more than 1000lb cow, BUT feed requirements are only 13% more Mouse vs. elephant

MARC Cycle VII Post-weaning Growth and Carcass Traits Mature Cow weight ADG Slaughter Weight Carcass Weight Hereford 1417 # 3.32 1322 # 803 # Angus 1408 # 3.32 1365 # 836 # Red Angus 1406 # 3.26 1333 # 811 # Simmental 1401 # 3.26 1362 # 829 # Gelbvieh 1320 # 3.12 1312 # 800 # Limousin 1388 # 3.12 1285 # 795 # Charolais 1368 # 3.21 1348 # 826 #

So when is Milk EPD too high??? Environmental Challenge Drought Fescue Toxicity (ergot) Excessive heat Nutritional deficiency In most cases, 3-4 of these happen at the same time Pinkeye, BRD, etc.

The Fescue Belt?

Facts about fescue Fat cows are better than thin Fat seems to dilute the toxin effect Moderate/Low milk better than High milk Red & white hides better than black Creep feed can help mid- to late-summer Fall calving avoids nutrient demand in high toxicity Good fescue cows were gestated in a cow on fescue (bulls too!) Do not move bred heifers to the fescue belt The buy local movement Dilution, legumes, & management effective

Energy & CP Requirements Item % TDN % CP Mid-Gestation Req. 53 8 Late Gestation Req. 57 10 Early Lactation Req. 63 12 Hay 43 63 6-22 Corn silage 63-70 7-10 Corn stover 45 55 4-7 Wheat straw 44 48 < 5 Soybean straw 35-45 < 5

All cows are not created equal.

Table 13-2. Daily Energy and Protein Requirements for a 1200 lb., BCS 5, Mature Cow a,b Months Cow Since Scale Wt. NE m c CP d NE m CP NE m CP Calving BCS = 5 Mcal lbs Mcal lbs Mcal lbs 1 April 1200 14.5 2.4 15.8 2.7 17.2 3.0 2 (peak lactation) 1200 15.3 2.6 16.9 3.0 18.6 3.4 3 1205 14.8 2.5 16.3 2.8 17.8 3.2 4 1205 14.0 2.3 15.1 2.5 16.3 2.8 5 August 1205 13.1 2.1 14.0 2.3 14.9 2.5 6 1210 12.5 1.9 13.1 2.0 13.7 2.2 7 (weaning) 1215 9.0 1.5 9.0 1.5 9.0 1.5 8 1225 9.3 1.5 9.3 1.5 9.3 1.5 9 1240 9.8 1.6 9.8 1.6 9.8 1.6 10 January 1260 10.7 1.7 10.7 1.7 10.7 1.7 11 1290 12.0 1.9 12.0 1.9 12.0 1.9 12 1340 13.9 2.2 13.9 2.2 13.9 2.2 a Adapted from NRC, 1996 +140 b Does not account for increased energy needs due to cold stress Expected Peak Milk (lbs/day) Low (15 lbs) Moderate (20 lbs) High (25 lbs) Pasture Stalks +250 BCS 3 c Net energy for maintenance, Mcal/day d Crude protein, lb/day

E Requirements: Wind Chill Wind Chill, o F Thin or Wet Cow Moderate, Dry Cow 30 0 % 0 % 20 +30 % ~ 2.5 lb corn +13 % 10 +60 % ~ 5 lb corn +26 % 0 +90 % ~ 7.5 lb corn +39 % ~ 1 lb corn ~ 2.5 lb corn ~ 4 lb corn

If Milk is the N of Corn Thin cows, expensive energy feeds Open cows!

This is where corn may be headed

Capturing Heterosis

Heterosis Breed Distances (Picture courtesy of the USDA-Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE)

Embrace Heterosis Breed Complementarity The more unrelated the breeds, the better Match your Cows to your environment, your bulls to your market. The potential weaknesses of one breed should be offset by the strengths of another Africander X Hereford (pink eye/cancer eye)

Performance (growth, fertility, etc ) HETEROSIS Heterosis Amt. exceeding the parental ave. Average of A & B Breed A Breed B Crossbred A X B Crossbred animals tend to perform better, in certain traits, than the average of their parents. Heterosis is that amount by which performance in the crossbred exceeds the parental average.

3 Types of Heterosis 1. INDIVIDUAL HETEROSIS - found in X bred calves 2. MATERNAL HETEROSIS - 2/3 of the crossbreeding advantage 3. PATERNAL HETEROSIS - found in composite sires

MATERNAL HETEROSIS effects reproductive performance - earlier puberty - higher 1 st service conception rate - lower embryonic death loss - faster breed back - higher % calves weaned - greater longevity (1.3 years) - maternal impact on calf performance - more milk & improved immune response passed to calves

PATERNAL HETEROSIS - increased mating ability, fertility, longevity - lower cull rates - increased SC & sperm viability INDIVIDUAL HETEROSIS - higher early calf growth - more early vigor (more live calves)

Average Heterosis in Beef Cattle Traits Trait % Heterosis Calf Crop Weaned 8 Weaning Weight 13 Yearling Weight 4 Carcass Traits 3 Lifetime Productivity 25

HETEROSIS from Various Crossbreeding Systems % Max. heterosis % inc. in calf wt. / cow exposed Term. sire/purch. F1 100 Maximum 23-28 Purebreds 0 Unless crossing inbred lines within a breed 0 2 breed rotation 67 16 3 breed rotation 86 20 2 breed composite 3 breed composite 50 63 Still considerable heterosis 12 15 Rotating F1 (AB/AD) 67 16 Rotating F1 (AB/CD) 83 19

The Dollars of Heterosis 100 cows, 80% Weaning Rate, 575 avg. weaning weight, 10 year horizon Calf Survival to Weaning (4%) = 40 hd. Weaning wt. (8%) = +36,800 lb. Weaning wt. per cow exposed (23%) = +105,800 lb. ~ 18 calves/year @$2.00 weaning wt ~ heterosis is worth $207/cow/year SimPlace 2008:The Science of Making Better Cattle and Better Beef

Summary The cow size argument is not winnable. Big cows work better when feed is delivered. Small cows work better when forage is scarce. Milk EPD may drive reproductive success/failure. Genetic trend (maternal breeds) may limit our mgmt options Fescue toxicity can be managed. Thin, open cows are a management mistake, not a product of environment. Cow employee checklists are effective. What are your expectations? Bull Selection may get cows fired or hired!

What do you expect out of your cows? Write down the top 3-5 things they MUST do to stay on the farm!!! How many cows pass ALL the specs? Are you buying bulls to help them succeed? MILK EPD too high? Mature size vs. resources Docility EPD? Breed of Choice? Could A.I. or E.T. get you there faster?

Questions? Patrick Wall ISUEO Beef Field Specialist 210 N. Iowa Street Knoxville, IA 50238 O: 641-842-2014 C: 515-450-7665 patwall@iastate.edu www.iowabeefcenter.org