Assessing Regional Water Impacts of Biofuel Production Scenarios

Similar documents
Analysis of Water Consumption in the Major Steps of Bioethanol Production

How Efficient is Your Nitrogen Program? Assessing Nitrogen Use Efficiency on Your Farm

Growing Crops for Biofuels Has Spillover Effects

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Availability of Biomass Feedstocks in the Appalachian Region

Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs

Simulated Nitrogen Loading from Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean Production in the Upper Mississippi Valley

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

Nutrient Reduction Strategy and Best Management Practices

Nitrogen For Corn Production

Agricultural and Economic Impacts of Moving to a Biobased Economy

Water Implications of Biofuel Policy in the U.S.

Production of Biofuels Feedstock on Agriculture Land and Grasslands

Application of improved SWAT model for bioenergy production scenarios in Indiana Watersheds

How do climate change and bioenergy crop production affect watershed sustainability?

Cost-effective Allocation of Conservation Practices using Genetic Algorithm with SWAT

Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension

Targeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Corn Stover Cost, Availability, and Sustainability

Regional Changes in Water Quality Associated with Switchgrass Feedstock

Nutrient Use Efficiency: A Midwest Perspective

HYPOXIA ACTION PLAN: WHAT CAN MIDWEST AGRICULTURE DO? Dennis McKenna Illinois Department of Agriculture

For the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to

Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed

REAP: Renewable Energy Assessment Project

Nutrient Balances in North American Soils

Cover Crops For Midwest Farming Systems. Jeremy Singer Research Agronomist

A systems approach to biomass sustainability

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

A Presentation of the 2012 Drainage Research Forum. November 20, 2012 Farmamerica, Waseca MN

For the full report Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy go to

Addressing Economic & Environmental Risks While No-Tilling

Past, Present and Future: U.S. Biorenewables Industry. Jill Euken, Deputy Director

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

The University of Minnesota Water Resources Center: My Vision, My Experience

know and what we don t

Environmental And Energy Study Institute

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information

Strategies for nitrate reduction: The Cedar River Case Study

Assessment of large-scale bioenergy cropping scenarios for the Upper Mississippi and Ohio-Tennessee River Basins

Self-Study Course. Continuing Education. Water balance and nitrate leaching under corn in kura clover living mulch

Cover Crops, Wetlands, and Conservation Drainage

Water Implications of Biofuels in the U.S.

Biomass Resources in the Midwest Region!

Ecosystem Service Effects from Biofuels Production and Use

University of Wisconsin Discovery Farms Staff 2013 Wisconsin Corn / Soy Expo Wisconsin Dells, WI

OVERVIEW Billion Ton Report recap Goals of the 2010 Update Key assumptions of methods of analysis. Results

Center for Nutrient Solutions (CNS) Nutrient Solution Scenarios Concept Paper September 5, 2014 Draft

A Presentation of the 2011 IA MN SD Drainage Research Forum. November 22, 2011 Okoboji, Iowa

Biofuels: Costs and Potential for Mitigating Greenhouse Gases

Value of Manure as a Fertilizer. What s so good about manure? Typical Nutrient Concentration

Nutrient and Sediment Loss Reduction by Perennial & Cover Crops

RESEARCH. AFREC Research Projects. htm

Snap Plus and P Index Update. Larry Bundy, Sue Porter, and Laura Ward Good Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison & WDATCP

Edge-of-Field Monitoring

Soil and Water Assessment Tool. R. Srinivasan Texas A&M University

Economics of a New Generation of Bioenergy Crops: Implications for Land Use and Greenhouse Gases

Monitoring Runoff and Sediment at the Platteville Pioneer Farm

Corn Producers, Ethanol Markets, and Co-Products: Jamey Cline, Director of Biofuels and Business Development

Role of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Maryland Nutrient Management Program

The Economic and Policy Challenges of Biofuels

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

Testimony to the U. S. Commission on Ocean Policy Great Lakes Regional Public Meeting September 24, Chicago, Illinois

Integrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model

NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL

Value of Poultry Manure Nutrients for Crop Production. Antonio Mallarino and John Sawyer Department of Agronomy

Manag Mana in g g Soil Carbon to Imp to Im rove Water Qualit Douglas L. Douglas L Karlen USDA USDA--ARS National ARS National Soil Tilth Lab REAP

Topic Paper #16. Yield Projections for Major U.S. Field Crops and Potential Biomass Crops

Energy Issues Affecting Corn/Soybean Systems: Challenges for Sustainable Production

New Studies Portray Unbalanced Perspective on Biofuels. DOE Committed to Environmentally Sound Biofuels Development

Optimizing yield while minimizing phosphorus water quality impacts: Some do s and don ts

Environmental Concerns in Midwest Agricultural Landscapes. Roberta Parry US EPA Office of Water June 25, 2014

Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show

Sustainable Biofuel Production

Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Cropland. Renee Hancock, NE NRCS State Water Quality Specialist

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Nitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Nutrient Application Planning for Pastures with SnapPlus. and. The Wisconsin P Index

Overview of Nitrogen Management and Groundwater: Considerations for manure irrigation

Grant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm

F1. Reducing Cropland Nitrogen Losses to Surface Waters

Importance of Phosphorus in Plant and Human Nutrition

Detours on the Road to Sustainable Feedstock Production for Cellulosic Biofuel: Assessing Multidimensional Policy Approaches

The Effect of Cover Crops on Surface Water Quality: A Paired Watershed Experiment in the Lake Bloomington Watershed.

4Rs for Healthy Soils & Healthy Waters

A Model Integration Framework for Assessing Integrated Landscape Management Strategies

Nitrogen (N) affects in-state and downstream waters in three primary ways:

University of Maryland Phosphorus Management Tool (The Revised Maryland PSI)

Nitrates and Row Cropping

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

USDA Acreage & Stocks Report

Improved Simulation of Soil and. Manure Phosphorus Loss in SWAT

Modeling Sediment and Nutrient Loads Input to Great Lakes and Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Water Quality

Corn Wet Mill Improvement and Corn Dry Mill Improvement Pathways Summary Description

Transcription:

Assessing Regional Water Impacts of Biofuel Production Scenarios May Wu, Yonas Demissie, Eugene Yan Argonne National Laboratory GWPC Annual Forum Water and Energy Sustainability Sept. 26-29, 2010 Pittsburgh, PA

Water Quality and Quantity Impacts Must be Addressed for A Sustainable Biofuel Production Large scale biofuel feedstock production Environmental loading to waterways Chemical and nutrient accumulation in surface and ground water Competing water use from multiple sectors and projects Power Biofuel Agricultural Urban development Compounding effect on water body Hypoxia zone expansion Aquatic ecosystem degradation 2

Upper Mississippi River Basin Plays A Major Role in Biofuel Production UMRB The region Covers IL, IA, IN, Wis, MN, SD, MS 131 sub-basins, 121 million acres Includes 27 Mln acres of corn in 2006, 68% of total corn acreages in UMRB states Produced 4,476 million bushels of corn in 2006-42% in U.S. Holds an ethanol production capacity of 5.3 billion gallons (in operation) 48% of U.S. production in 2009

Agricultural Inputs and Land Use Changes WI SD MO MN IN IL IA Basin N Applied (lb/acre) Dynamic land use changes in recent years 2006 2007 2008 Millions - 4 8 12 16 20 24 Pasture land acreages P2O5 applied (lb/acre) K2O applied (lb/acre) Illinois 143 64 96 Indiana 147 72 109 Iowa 130 45 77 Minnesota 131 52 55 Missouri 158 48 59 South Dakota 107 35 10 Wisconsin 100 31 50 Upholds modest to high fertilizer inputs Maintains high corn yield 167 bu/acre compare to 149 bu/acre of U.S. average (2006) Productivity continue to increase in the past forty years. More grain produced for each kg of nitrogen applied. Land use changes unstable

Point Sources Inputs Live Stock Operation Major livestock: beef, dairy, swine. Estimated a total annual production of 129 million metric tons (wet) of manure in 2006. Major WWTPs Water discharge: 10,191 BGY Nitrogen: 27,414 MT/yr Total annual loading to UMRB from WWTP and major industries 29, 000 metric ton nitrogen 48 metric ton phosphorus ** Permit value 6

Examine Options to Meet Sustainability Requirement for the Biofuel Production System Watershed environmental loading Surface water Ground water Factors considered Types of biofuel feedstock Grain Ag residue Perennial grass Yield increase due to improved N use efficiency Agricultural practices Land use changes Pasture land 7

Changes in Water Cycle Dynamics Evapotranspiration Precipitation Water evaporation Irrigation uptake Upper stream inflow Soil water stock Runoff Surface water stock Irrigation uptake Percolation Base flow Groundwater stock Outflow to down stream

Modeling Framework for UMRB Ground surface topography Water use Sub basin Others: Climate, Tile drainage Tillage, Point source Reservoirs Land use, crop rotation Fertilizer Model Calibration Water flow, nitrogen, and phosphorus (USGS) Corn yield (USDA) Soil type

From Grain to Biomass Feedstock Scenario I Scenario II Scenario III Corn in 2015 Large Increase in yield for corn and ethanol Moderate increase in fertilizer application rate No expansion in corn acreage Corn Stover harvest Various removal rate Additional fertilizer application Soil property changes Corn Switchgrass Pasture land conversion 10% Fertilizer application Average yield, high yield Baseline year for crops: 2006 10

Feedstock and Biofuel Production Baseline Scenario I Scenario II Scenario III 2006 Increased yield Stover SWG Corn 765 mln bu Corn 1.5 bln bu Corn 1.5 bln bu Corn 1.5 bln bu Stover 25 mln d.t. SWG 8 mln d.t. Bln Gallons Baseline Additional ethanol production 2.1 2.4 4.6 3.2 24% of the corn stover is harvested for fuel production High yield scenario for SWG

Factors Attributable to Reductions in Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Soil Erosion N efficiency, fertilizer application practice, and nitrogen in agricultural residue all contribute to N loadings Harvesting corn stover increases soil evaporation because of reduced ground cover. Growing perennial grass increases plant transpiration because of high water demand for fast growth. Perennial grass is able to reduce soil loss and capture some of the run-off phosphorus.

Concluding Remarks A landscaping design is recommended to incorporate water constraints and nutrient considerations into planning for a sustainable feedstock production Key factors affecting nutrient loadings Crop nitrogen use efficiency Advanced fertilizer management (precision farming) Cellulosic biomass feedstock may affect water cycle dynamics Data needs for large scale watershed modeling Adequate crop and plant growth characterization that reflect advancement in plant biotechnology and genetics and new feedstock Groundwater nutrient monitoring data collection Additional thoughts: Nitrate in groundwater requires a time delay before reaching the surface stream and current concentration in GW is a cumulative results of past 30-50 years of practices. Effect of newly implemented BMPs and other nitrate lowering strategies may not shown immediately until years later.

Acknowledgement Sponsor DOE EERE Office of Biomass Program Zia Haq Alison Goss Eng Collaborator Army Corp. Engineers ERDC-Environmental Laboratory Zhonglong Zhang Contact : mwu@anl.gov 14