NCCI Conference. Design and Operational Aspects. Hybrid Energy Center. David Leaf Manager Projects

Similar documents
Stephen Nelson COO. Longview Power, LLC

Governor s Energy Conference October 13, Greg Workman Director, Fuels Dominion Generation

Longview Power- An Advanced Supercritical Coal Plant

Emissions Calculations - Stack

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Updates on the Performance of Selected Circulation Dry Scrubbers Shiaw Tseng McIlvaine Company Webinar

Coal Combustion Residuals Fugitive Dust Control Plan

Sheffield s Energy Recovery Facility

Minimizing FGD Costs Mr. Bryan D. Hansen, P.E., Burns & McDonnell

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

Kazushige KUROSAWA*, Zhibao ZHANG**, and Zhengbing WANG** [Delivered Products & Systems] 1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Nanjing

VIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT ARDLEY EFW PLANT EP APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

GOVERNMENT of PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD

2015 ANNUAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION REPORT PLUM POINT ENERGY STATION CLASS 3N LANDFILL PERMIT NO S3N AFIN:

New 790-Megawatt Unit. Council Bluffs Energy Center

DEC 7, 2012 Biomass Project Partnership

Advanced Coal Power Plant Water Usage

Wellington Development WVDT, LLC Greene Energy Resource Recovery Project 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS

Refuse-to-Energy Facility

Up gradation of Boilers to Implement New Pollution Norms

Wastewater Treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge Technologies: Overview and New Developments Gordon Maller URS Process Technologies, Austin, TX

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER PLANTS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE WORK WITH LESS POLLUTION

THE WABASH RIVER IGCC PROJECT REPOWERING COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS

High efficient multi-fuel CYMIC concept for biomass, rejects and coal for Hamburger Hungaria Katriina Jalkanen Valmet Technologies Oy

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

FINAL DETERMINATION. To Grant a. Temporary Permit/Non-Attainment New Source Review Permit. For. Concord Steam Corporation.

Georgia Environmental Conference Power Industry Then and Now August 23, 2013

Borregaard Case Study. Sarpsborg I & II

Omya Water & Energy omya.com. Flue Gas Cleaning. Sustainable and efficient flue gas desulfurization (FGD)

EMO August 1, Bobby I.T. Chen Client Program Manager

Energy Production Systems Engineering

The Value Proposition of Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubbing Technology. Robert Giglio Foster Wheeler Global Power Group

nat Presentation Title ( Arial, Font size 28 ) Control of Sulphur Dioxide, Oxides of Nitrogen and Mercury Date, Venue, etc..( Arial, Font size 18 )

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Comparison of Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Particulate Matter, Mercury and Carbon Dioxide Emissions for IGCC and Other Electricity Generation.

Ⅰ. Introduction of Samcheok Green Power

High Bridge Combined Cycle Plant

September 20, Water Docket U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 4203M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

CCR Fugitive Dust Control Plan

The Future of Coal Ash

Coal Characteristics and Biomass Cofiring in Pulverized Coal Boilers

Proceedings of of the 17th Annual North American Proceedings Waste-to-Energy of NAWTEC17 17 th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference

PERMITTEE Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, FL 33618

Coal s Strategic Position in the U.S. for the Next 10 Years. Gerald A. Hollinden, Ph.D. URS Corporation Pittsburgh Coal Conference September 24, 2002

CDS Systems for Industrial Boilers

Cory Riverside Energy. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY PSD, NSPS (40CFR60), NESHAP (40CFR63) CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

Fly ash and the Environmental. Benjamin J Franklin Director of Technical Services Headwaters Resources

COAL WATER SLURRY FUEL Alternate Fuel for Thailand

Excerpt of Thermal Power Guidelines for New Plants

Table 1. Boiler Design. Control Equipment LNB SCR ACI Dry-FGD BH. LNB SCR Wet-FGD ESP. (30% Pet Coke) LNB SCR BH Wet-FGD. (single coal supply)

Field trip to Arnoldstein WTE facility Arnoldstein, Austria, December 19, by Werner Sunk

Techno-Economic Evaluation of. with Post Combustion Capture

Cory Environmental. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility


Advanced Integrated Dual-Oxidant CFB Power Plant with CCS Oxy-Coal CFB

2. How can the University have an expansion of the Cogeneration Facility without an increase in the amount of coal used?

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

FutureGen 2.0 Update

FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN

High-Efficiency Integrated Solid Wasteto-Energy

CLEANER PRODUCTION GUIDELINES IN SMELTING INDUSTRIESS

Heat and electricity from waste Sysav s waste-to-energy plant

Current Status of Recycling and Thermal Waste Destruction in the U.S.

Fabric Filter Systems. Providing compliance level control for difficult applications. United McGill products. a McGill AirClean product

Questionnaire (Conventional Energy)

A REVIEW OF THE EXPECTED AIR EMISSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED FIBROSHORE 40-MW POWER PLANT TO BE FUELED WITH POULTRY LITTER AND WOOD

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017

Progress in Air Quality: Sustainable Improvements. NCSL Advisory Council on Energy June 18, 2007

Emissions Control Project

Cory Environmental. Riverside Resource Recovery Facility

DRY HYDRATED LIME INJECTION FOR COAL-FIRED BOILER FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION (FGD) FOREWORD

Power Plant Water Usage and Loss

AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO [AMENDMENT TO AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO ] IS ISSUED TO

ECO2 LINCS LTD SLEAFORD RENEWABLE ENERGY PLANT IPPC APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

AIR QUALITY PERMIT Issued under 401 KAR 52: Wolohan Drive, Suite 1 Ashland

Energy & Sustainability. Lecture 14: Fossil Fuels Coal February 26, 2009

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

global power group David J. Parham Executive Vice President, Global Sales & Marketing Global Power Group

Perspective on Coal Utilization Technology

Meeting Multiple Challenges: Re-Rating W. A. Parish Unit 8

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Clean Coal Technology

a long-term sustainable solution for waste

GHGT 13, 11th November 2016 Lausanne, Switzerland. Kemper County Energy Facility

RELIABLE AND EFFICIENT POWER GENERATION POWER BOILERS

Sustainable, Clean Energy from Waste

Circulating Fluidized Bed Technology for Large Scale Power Generation Using Coal and Petroleum Coke

SUMMARY OF VARIABLE NON-FUEL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ( O&M ) COSTS

INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY

Circulating fluidized bed technology for utility-scale lignite power plants

Drying of High-Moisture Coals For Power Production & Gasification

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

Performance and Benefits of Flue Gas Treatment Using Thiosorbic Lime

Ensuring Sustainable Coal Supply. Power Generation

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT - PSD APPROVAL NSPS-NESHAP EMISSION UNITS

Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification

Transcription:

October 21, 2010 NCCI Conference Design and Operational Aspects of the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center David Leaf Manager Projects 1 1

2

July 2010 Aerial Photo 3 3

VCHEC Presentation Outline Safety Project Background Economic Impacts Project Schedule Environmental Aspects Design and Operation Construction Status 4 4

VCHEC Safety Project has worked over 6 million manhours without a lost time accident Project to Date - OSHA recordable rate of 1.23 injuries per 200,000 hours worked Year to Date OSHA recordable rate of 0.78 injuries per 200,000 hours worked CHSWMF has worked over one year without a recordable. 5 5

Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center- Part of Dominions Generation Expansion Strategy We ve achieved a mercury permit that, to our knowledge, is the most stringent mercury permit for a coal-fired power plant in the nation. - Cale Jaffe, Southern Environmental Law Center (Tricities News, September 3, 2009) 2130 workers on site more than 30% from Southwest Virginia Air permit upheld by Richmond Circuit Court Project more than 71 percent complete. Construction is 60% complete 6

SB 651 (2004) HB 3068/SB 1416 (2007) Virginia s legislative incentive for development of major coal-fired power stations in southwest Virginia responded to a growing need for energy. To ensure electric energy reliability and promote economic development, an investor-owned utility may petition the SCC for approval. Power station located in the coalfield region of Virginia that burns Virginia coal is in the public interest. Allows recovery of construction and associated infrastructure costs enhanced rate of return. Recovery through rates reduces investor risk. 7

VCHEC Economic Benefits 1800 new jobs during construction Adds upwards of $6 million in tax revenue each year Permanent employment of at least 75 plant operators - Annual payroll of over $4 million Creating an additional 350 local mining jobs Independent study by Virginia Tech found that the project would have an economic impact of more than $439 million annually. Most significant economic benefits will be after the plant begins operation. More than doubles the economic output of Wise County. 8 8

9 9

Southwest Virginia Power Station CFB Clean Coal Technology Limestone injection, FGD, SNCR, Carbon Injection and fabric filters capture: - Sulfur dioxide - Nitrogen oxides - Particulate t matter -Mercury Coal Generator Steam Turbine Chimney Limestone Circulating Fluidized Bed Furnace (CFB) Heat Exchanger Selective Non-Catalytic Nitrogen Oxide Reduction System (SNCR) Fabric Filter Particulate Control Air Pre-Heater Fan 10 Air Ash Removal Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization System Ash Removal

VCHEC Environmental Control Equipment Air Emissions Control Equipment: CFB Boiler reduces SOX, and NOX Selective Noncatalytic NOX Reduction System (SNCR) Dry Scrubber for SOX reduction Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control Baghouse for Particulate Matter Control Misc. Baghouses on material handling systems Dust suppression system on coal pile Water wash systems for vehicles Barrier Fencing screening 11 Water discharge Control Equipment: Air cooled condensers significantly reduce water usage Extensive water recycle within plant water system Wastewater Clarifier to treat water for recycle or discharge Sedimentation Ponds for stormwater runoff Coal and limestone pile runoff pond ph treatment system 11

VCHEC Emissions Compared to Other Facilities SO2 NOx PM Hg Permit Ratio'd to VCHEC Ratio'd to VCHEC Ratio'd tovchec Ratio'd tovchec Combustion Technology MW Date MW Basis (tpy) MW Basis (tpy) MW Basis (tpy) MW Basis (tpy) 1960's PC Unit 585 56,174 29,023 133,880 498 1970's PC Unit 585 56,174 18,256 1,339 95 1980's CFB Unit 585 13,452 10,762 451 74 1990's CFB Unit 585 6,726 5,381 361 49 JEA 1 595 14-Jul-99 3,694 2,216 271 466 Seward 2 520 23-Apr-01 16,635 4,487 318 NA Sandow (Unit 5) 3 600 25-Sep-03 3,990 2,658 398 181 AES Puerto Rico 4 454 10-Aug-04 352 1,597 245 NA Cleco 5 600 23-Feb-06 3,841 1,792 335 NA Spurlock (Units 3 and 4) 6 540 31-Jul-06 4,059 1,840 254 96 Cliffside (Unit 6) 7 800 29-Jan-08 6,709 4,792 846 176 VCHEC 585 30-Jun-08 604 1,920 329 5 12 NOTE 1 - JEA Northside has two coal/pet coke CFB's. Facility operates on 80% pet coke / 20% coal. NOTE 2 - Reliant Seward has two waste coal CFB's. NOTE 3 - Luminant Sandow 5 consists of two lignite-fired CFB's. NOTE 4 - AES Puerto Rico facility has two CFBs that operate on South American, low sulfur bituminous coal. NOTE 5 - Cleco has two CFBs that operate on pet coke and/or coal. NOTE 6 - Spurlock 3 and 4 are two CFBs that operate on coal and up to 10% TDF. NOTE 7 - Cliffside 6 is a PC boiler. Items in green identify permit limits lower than VCHEC 12

VCHEC Water Usage Comparison The Power Station will utilize Air Cooled Condenser technology - Reduces overall water consumption - Eliminates evaporation of water into the atmosphere 13 13

SPX Air Cooled Condensor 60 fan system (5x12) 12 two speed fans / 48 single speed fans Designed to operate at 4.5 in Hg @ 87 F Option selected for tube cleaning system 14

Waste Water Reuse System 15 15

CHSWMF Basic Facts 16 Site Design - GAI Consultants, Inc., Homestead, PA Location approximately 1 mile west of power block in valley - Curley Hollow Facility - 330 acres Lined area - 158 acres Storage capacity - 35 million cubic yards Facility will be permitted as an industrial solid waste landfill to receive fossil fuel combustion byproducts (FFPs) Max. ash production: 268 tons per hour 45,000 tons per week 2 million tons per year Haul 5 days/week, 20 hours/day @ 10,000 tons/day Site life at Average ash disposal rate is approx. 20-30 years (actual site life will differ depending on coal used, plant 16 outages and beneficial reuse of fly ash)

17 17

18 Major Component General Arrangement

Plant Design Parameters 19 Operating Conditions Fuel (Coal Only) Fuel (Wood @ 20% Heat Input) Limestone Hydrated Lime (93% CaOH 2 ) Brine Solution (NaCl) Input 393 t/hr 7677 BTU/lb 125 t/hr 58682 lb/hr 29 t/hr 7974 lb/hr 666 lb/hr Activated t Carbon 564 lb/hr Ammonia (19%) Water (St. Paul) Water (Recycled from CCB Storage) Auxiliary Load 345 gal/hr 494 gpm 383 gpm 81 MW Operating Conditions Gross MW (100%VWO) Output 668 Heat Rate 9973 (guarantee) BTU/kwh Ash (Performance Fuel) Ash (Worst Case Fuel) Waste Water* 193 t/hr 268 t/hr 0 gpm *For waste water to be this value, leachate water flows must match the recycled water value shown All values are based on Performance Fuel unless otherwise noted. All values are based on full plant load (2 boilers).

Plant Storage Capacities 20 Piles Bins/Tanks/Silo Coal 10 day 12 hrs Limestone 10 day 24 hrs Wood 10 day 45 min Hydrated Lime (93% CaOH 2 ) 5 days Ammonia (19%) 10 day 1430 lb/hr Start-Up Fuel Oil 550,000 gal Make Up Water Reclaim Water Tank Demin Tank Fly Ash Silos* Bed Ash Silo* 1,000,000 gal 1,000,000 gal 500,000000 gal 72 hrs 72 hrs Activated Carbon 14 day 100 ton *Fly and Bed Ash Silos volumes designed for Performance Fuel ash rates

Fuel Specifications PERFORMANCE COAL - PROXIMATE ANALYSIS Min Max Performance Coal Volatile Matter, % 19.3 22.1 19.6 Fixed Carbon, % 25.3 35.7 31.3 Ash, % 34.2 46.6 41.6 Moisture, % 6.2 9.0 7.0 Sulfur, % 0.8 1.8 1.0 Chlorine, ppm in dry solids Fluorine, ppm in as received solids Lead, ppm in as received solids 350 500 400 860 61 Mercury, ppm in as 051 0.51 received solids Thermal Energy HHV (Btu/lb) 6,794 8,717 7,677 Up to 20% wood fuel can be fired and maintain MCR. Wood Fuels Fuel Wood Potential Fuel Range Type Forest Residuals Design Basis Proximate Analysis (%W) As Rec d Dry As Rec'd As Rec'd Fixed Carbon 7.9 13.62 7.9 9.4 Volatile Matter 47.8 82.40 47.5 57.0 Ash 2.3 3.97 2.3 2.8 Moisture 42.0 42.3 30.8 TOTAL 100 100 100 100 Heat Content BTU/# 5000 21

22 COAL RECEIVING AND STORAGE

23 COAL STORAGE AND RECLAIMING

Material Handling Area #5 Coal Unloading & Storage 24

25 LIMESTONE STORAGE AND RECLAIM

26 WOOD WASTE STORAGE AND RECLAIM

27 Material Handling Area #5 Wood, Limestone & Coal Infeed

VCHEC Biomass Requirements Facility will be capable of utilizing up to 20% of its total heat input from wood chips. After the first 36 months of operation, the facility shall use at least 5% biomass per year. Starting the 5 th year of operation, biomass will be increased by 1% each year to no less than 10% for all subsequent years. Can request relief if market conditions result in significant ratepayer costs. 28

Conversion of Bremo Power Station As part of the Virginia City air permit, Dominion will convert its Bremo Power Station, an older, coal-fired power station in Central Virginia, to gas once Virginia City is operational. State Corporation Commission must approve conversion. This would significantly reduce emissions from Bremo. -- Would more than offset the mercury and nitrogen oxide emissions i from VCHEC -- Would offset significant portions of other emissions, including carbon dioxide 29 29

VCHEC Project Photos 30 December 2008 chimney shell complete 30

VCHEC C Project Photos 1/18/2010 0 April 2, 2009 September 2, 2010 January 1, 2010 31 March 3, 2010 31

Steel going up 32 32

Air Cooled Condenser Structure 33 33

Project Photos Looking SE @ FO & Makeup Water Tanks & Looking SW @ Coal Unloading Pit 34 34

Project Photos 35 35 Looking NW @ Steam DrumLift Boiler 11 & Looking NE @ STG Bridge Crane Lift

VCHEC Project Gantry Crane Setting 1/6/2010 36 36

VCHEC Project Curley Hollow Solid Waste Management Facility 37 September 2008 37

Aerial View September 2010 38 38

First HRA Module Placed 9/1/2010 39 39

Curley Hollow Liner Installation 40 40

Questions? 41 41

Generator Stator Delivery 42 Steam Turbine Generator Stator supplied by Toshiba Stator Manufactured in Japan, Shipped to Louisiana Barged from Port Allen to Knoxville via river system. Stator weight 795,869 #, Rig approximately 1.3 Million # 265 feet long (w/o tractors), 22 feet wide, 19 feet tall. Width expanded to 31 feet required for select structures. Toshiba responsible for Delivery 42

Generator Stator Delivery 43 Barnhart Crane and Rigging selected for heavy haul. Travel route over 176 miles from Knoxville, TN to Virginia City, VA Required permits from TN and VA Over 45 bridges required evaluation One bridge required shoring One bridge required reinforcement 8 structures required temporary jump bridges. Travel took 14 days, travelling only at night. Limited to 20,000# per axle in TN 43

Stator Delivery 44 44

Stator Delivery Rig at rest during day stop Installation of temporary jump bridge 45 45

Stator Installation 46 46

VCHEC Plant Design Parameters 47 Operating Conditions Fuel (Coal Only) Fuel (Wood @ 20% Heat Input) Input 408 t/hr 120 t/hr Limestone 56756 lb/hr 28 t/hr Hydrated Lime (93% CaOH 2 ) Brine (NaCl) Activated Carbon Ammonia (19%) Water (St. Paul) Water (Recycled from CCB Storage) Auxiliary Load 7974 lb/hr 590 lb/hr TBD 345 gal/hr 494 gpm 383 gpm 81 MW Operating Conditions Gross MW (100%VWO) Heat Rate (operating case) Ash (Performance Fuel) Ash (Worst Case Fuel) Waste Water* Output 668 8996 BTU/kwh 193 t/hr 276 t/hr 0 gpm *For waste water to be this value, leachate water flows must match the recycled water value shown All Values are based on Performance Fuel unless otherwise noted.

Actual Emissions Values in Air Permit Each Boiler (lb/mmbtu) Each Boiler (lb/hr) Filterable Particulate Matter (PM) 246.92 Combined Total (tons/yr) 3-hour average 0.010 31.32 30-day rolling average 0.009 Total PM-10 (filterable & condensable) 329.24 3-hour average 0.012 37.58 Total PM-2.5 (filterable & condensable) 329.242 3-hour average 0.012 37.58 Sulfur Dioxide 603.6 3-hour average 0.035 109.62 24-hour average 0.029 90.83 30-day rolling average 0.022022 0.21 lb/mwh (gross) Nitrogen Oxides (as NO 2 ) 1,920.54 30-day rolling average 0.07 219.24 Carbon Monoxide 2,743.63 30-day rolling average 0.10 313.2 Volatile Organic Compounds 137.18 3-hour average 0.005 15.66 Sulfuric Acid Mist (H 2 SO 4 ) 96.03 3-hour average 0.0035 10.96 Hydrogen Fluoride 12.90 3-hour average 0.00047 1.47 48 Hydrogen Chloride 79.54 3-hour average 0.0029 9.08 Mercury (12-month rolling avg) 0.00000088 lbs/mwhr 48