Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 226 INNOVATIVE REACTORS (June 2001)

Similar documents
PEP Review ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE By Michael Arné (November 2011)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 274 FUEL ALCOHOLS AND ELECTRICITY COGENERATION FROM PETROLEUM COKE GASIFICATION (December 2010)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 7D CAPROLACTAM UPDATE (October 2011)

PEP Report 50E POLYCARBONATE By Susan Bell (October 2007)

PEP Review METHANOL PRODUCTION VIA TOYO PROCESS By Syed N. Naqvi (December 2011) ABSTRACT

Process Economics Program

Process Economics Program

Process Economics Program

Abstract PEP Review HEXENE PRODUCTION BY AXENS ALPHAHEXOL PROCESS By Girish Ballal (September 2012)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 252 CHEMICALS FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES (September 2004)

Abstract PEP Review ETHYLENE GLYCOL PRODUCTION FROM COAL-BASED SYNTHESIS GAS By Syed N. Naqvi and R. J. Chang (October 2012)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by NICK KORENS ROBERT W. VAN SCOY. January private report by the PARK, CALIFORNIA

PEP Review TIPPING POINT FOR POWER GENERATION: NEW NGCC VS LEGACY COAL By Michael Arné (December 2012)

Process Economics Program

Process Economics Program

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 270 THERMOCHEMICAL CELLULOSIC ETHANOL (December 2009)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 280 COMPENDIUM OF LEADING BIOETHANOL TECHNOLOGIES (December 2011)

Report No. 29 ETHYLENE. August A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM I STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM I. Supplement. June A private report by the STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE I MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 88A ALKYLATION FOR MOTOR FUELS (February 1993)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Process Economics Program Report No. 8C WET PROCESS PHOSPHORIC ACID. (August, 1982) Abstract

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 43C METHANOL (March 2000)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 173A SPECIALTY POLYOLEFINS: VLDPE (July 1993)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 34B PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE (October 1998)

Report No. 32 HYDROGEN. December A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE PARK, CALIFORNIA

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 190C ADVANCES IN MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY FOR CHEMICAL SEPARATION APPLICATIONS (June 2001)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

THE MIDDLE EAST S PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by THOMAS C. GUNN GEORGE E. HADDELAND MUHAMMAD ASHRAF. May A private report by the

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

AMINO ACIDS PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by WING S. FONG. Contributions by Victor E. Althouse. November A private report by the

Coal to Olefins Processes

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

CHLORINATED SOLVENTS

TRIMELLITIC AND PYROMELLITIC ANHYDRIDES

IHS CHEMICAL Chemical Value Chain Production Economics. Process Economics Program Review Chemical Value Chain Production Economics

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 76C ANILINE AND DERIVATIVES (December 1993)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 244 STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNITS OF EPOXY AND POLYCARBONATE RESINS (June 2002)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 229 REFINERY RESIDUE GASIFICATION (June 2001)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Abstract. Process Economics Program Report No. 149 ETHANOL FOR GASOHOL. (March 1982)

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 227 1,3-PROPANEDIOL AND POLYTRIMETHYLENE TEREPHTHLATE (December 1999)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 39C SYNDIOTACTIC POLYSTYRENE (August 1994)

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

OXIDATIVE COUPLING OF METHANE IN A CATALYTIC MEMBRANE REACTOR: MEMBRANE DEVELOPMENT AND REACTOR DESIGN

Hydrogen from Renewable Fuels by Autothermal Reforming: Alcohols, Carbohydrates, and Biodiesel

Simulation, Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Methane Using Aspen Plus

Hydrogen Separation Membrane Applications

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

MEthane activation via integrated MEmbrane REactors MEMERE

Oxidative Coupling of Methane: A Design of Integrated Catalytic processes

Oxidative pyrolysis of ethane

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 85B ANTIOXIDANTS AND LIGHT STABILIZERS (March 1993)

ABS RESINS PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 20. contributions by Shigeyoshi Takaoka. December, A private report by the

Industrial Solutions. The STAR process by Uhde

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

NOVEL CATALYTIC MEMBRANE REACTOR FOR OXIDATIVE COUPLING OF METHANE: REACTOR MODELLING AND DESIGN

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 210 HETEROCYCLIC NITROGEN COMPOUNDS (January 1993)

PERP Program Styrene from Ethane and Benzene New Report Alert

The Uhde STAR process Oxydehydrogenation of light paraffins to olefins

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

DISPOSAL AND RECOVERY OF WASTE ORGANO CHLORIDES

On-purpose Olefins through CATOFIN -CATADIENE Technologies

Microreaction Engineering: Is small really better? Jan J. Lerou

Table of Contents. iii. vi Tables. Figures. viii Foreword. ix Acknowledgments

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM

Report No. 69 ACETAL RESINS. June A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE I PARK, CALIFORNIA

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS Styrene/Ethylbenzene

The Shale Gas Revolution: A Renaissance?

Solution for the Feedstock Reshuffle: Technology & Economic Analyzer

ALKYLATION OPTIONS FOR ISOBUTYLENE AND ISOPENTANE. Presented By. David C. Graves Senior Research Engineer

Report No. 57A Supplement AND. September A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM PARK, CALIFORNIA STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE I

Two-Zone Fluidized Bed Reactor (TZFBR) as a Potential Tool for Process Intensification in Catalytic Reactions

Olefin Interactions in Sulfuric Acid Catalyzed Alkylation

Report No. 7 CAPROLACTAM PART II. November A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA


Synthetic Petroleum-Based Polymers

HEXAMETHYLENE DIAMINE

SAFE Oxygen and Hydrogen Innovative Separation Techniques for Pre- and Oxy-combustion Capture

6 Thermally coupled reactors for methanol synthesis - An exergetic approach

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF EXPANDED CHEMICAL AND PLASTICS MANUFACTURING IN APPALACHIA

Abstract Process Economics Report 237 CO 2. EMISSIONS REDUCTION (November 2000)

CHE 611 Advanced Chemical Reaction Engineering

10/2/2013. Gas CHEMICAL PLANTS AMMONIA METHANOL UTILITIES TOWN GASS SUPPLIES ENERGY INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES. Power Generation

Introduction to Chemical Plant Design Life Cycle

Transcription:

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 226 INNOVATIVE REACTORS (June 2001) This report examines potential applications and economic potential for the use of innovative chemical reactors in existing processes. A technology review profiles major design features and operational characteristics of conventional and innovative continuous chemical reactors including down flow, radial flow, tubular, fluidized bed, membrane, and porous wall reactors. Also breifly reviewed are static mixer, monolithic, microreactors, and reactive distillation. The report then focuses on the use of catalytic membrane reactors for potential large scale dehydrogenation applications including production of styrene from ethylbenzene, production of ethylene from ethane, and production of isobutene from isobutante. Following a review of membrane types and example applications, technical barriers and R&D needs are identified, and an economic analysis developed to define the current state of the art. Finally, an identification of potential applications by reaction class and chemical product is presented along with a conceptual techno-economic evaluation for SRI's novel porous wall reactor technology. Comparative process economics are reported for the sulfonation of methyl laurate for conventional and SRI's proposed process design to illustrate the commercial potential for SRI's reactor with process intensification. PEP'97 RMS

Report No. 226 INNOVATIVE REACTORS SUPPLEMENT By Ron Smith June 2001 A private report by the PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM Menlo Park, California 94025

SRIC agrees to assign professionally qualified personnel to the preparation of the Process Economics Program s reports and will perform the work in conformance with generally accepted professional standards. No other warranties expressed or implied are made. Because the reports are of an advisory nature, neither SRIC nor its employees will assume any liability for the special or consequential damages arising from the Client s use of the results contained in the reports. The Client agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold SRIC, its officers, and employees harmless from any liability to any third party resulting directly or indirectly from the Client s use of the reports or other deliverables produced by SRIC pursuant to this agreement For detailed marketing data and information, the reader is referred to one of the SRI Consulting programs specializing in marketing research. THE CHEMICAL ECONOMICS HANDBOOK Program covers most major chemicals and chemical products produced in the United States and the WORLD PETROCHEMICALS PROGRAM covers major hydrocarbons and their derivatives on a worldwide basis. In addition the SRIC DIRECTORY OF CHEMICAL PRODUCERS services provide detailed lists of chemical producers by company, product, and plant for the United States, Western Europe, Canada, and East Asia, South America and Mexico.

CONTENTS GLOSSARY... x 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 PROCESS INTENSIFICATION... 1-1 REPORT FOCUS... 1-3 2 INTRODUCTION... 2-1 OVERVIEW... 2-1 TECHNOLOGY STATUS... 2-1 ECONOMICS... 2-4 3 TECHNOLOGY REVIEW... 3-1 CONVENTIONAL REACTORS... 3-1 Down Flow Reactors... 3-1 Radial Flow Reactors... 3-2 Tubular Reactors... 3-2 Fluidized Bed Reactors... 3-3 Exothermic Reaction... 3-3 Endothermic Reaction... 3-4 INNOVATIVE REACTORS... 3-4 Membrane Reactors... 3-4 Equilibrium Enhancement with Non-Catalytic Reactors... 3-5 Equilibrium Enhancement in Catalytic Reactors... 3-7 Selectivity Enhancement with Catalytic Reactors... 3-14 Inorganic Porous Wall Reactors... 3-23 Butane Oxidation to Maleic Anhydride... 3-23 Other Innovative Separative Reactor Systems... 3-24 Static Mixer Reactors... 3-24 Large Scale Monolithic Reactors... 3-26 iii

CONTENTS (continued) Microreactors... 3-26 Reactive Distillation... 3-28 4 CATALYTIC MEMBRANE REACTORS... 4-1 DENSE MEMBRANES... 4-4 Hydrogenation... 4-5 Dehydrogenation... 4-6 POROUS MEMBRANES... 4-8 Dense vs. Porous Membranes... 4-8 Gas-Gas Reaction systems... 4-9 Thermal Incinerators for VOC Waste Emissions... 4-9 Gas-Liquid Reaction Systems... 4-10 ALTERNATIVE POROUS MEMBRANE MATERIALS... 4-11 Glass Membranes... 4-12 Ceramic Membranes... 4-12 Zeolite Membranes... 4-13 Perovskite Membranes... 4-14 DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF SEPARATIVE REACTORS... 4-16 Technical Barriers and R&D Needs... 4-16 DEHYDROGENATION APPLICATIONS... 4-20 Comparative Technical Specifications... 4-20 Conceptual Catalytic Membrane Reactor Systems... 4-22 PROCESS ECONOMICS... 4-23 Basis for Estimates and Evaluation... 4-24 Review of Commercial Processes... 4-25 Styrene Production from Ethylbenzene... 4-25 Ethylene Production from Ethane... 4-28 Isobutene Production from Isobutane... 4-28 iv

CONTENTS (continued) Butadiene Production from 1-Butene... 4-30 Review of Developmental Catalytic membrane Based Processes... 4-34 Styrene Production from Ethylbenzene... 4-34 Ethylene Production from Ethane... 4-35 Isobutene Production from Isobutane... 4-35 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS... 4-40 5 POROUS WALL REACTORS... 5-1 PROGRESSIVE ADDITION... 5-1 ALTERNATIVE REACTOR CONFIGURATIONS... 5-3 Heat Balances... 5-4 Permeability Reduction and Control... 5-6 Conceptual Scalability... 5-9 POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS... 5-10 SULFONATION OF METHYL LAURATE... 5-11 Falling Film Reactor... 5-11 Chemistry... 5-13 Process Description... 5-14 Process Discussion... 5-21 Cost Estimates... 5-23 Porous Wall Reactor Sulfonation Process... 5-27 Chemistry... 5-27 Process Description... 5-28 Process Discussion... 5.34 Cost Estimates... 5-35 Cost Comparison... 5.40 APPENDIX A: PATENT SUMMARY TABLES... A-1 APPENDIX B: DESIGN AND COST BASES... B-1 v

CONTENTS (concluded) APPENDIX C: CITED REFERENCES... C-1 APPENDIX D: PATENT REFERENCES BY COMPANY... D-1 APPENDIX E: PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM... E-1 vi

ILLUSTRATIONS 3.1 Plug Flow Membrane Reactor-Exothermic Reaction Temperature/Conversion Profile... 3-8 3.2 Perfect Mixing Membrane Reactor-Exothermic Reaction Temperature/Conversion Profile... 3-9 3.3 Plug Flow Reactor-Endothermic Reaction Temperature/Conversion Profile... 3-10 3.4 Perfect Mixing Membrane Reactor-Endothermic Reaction Temperature/Conversion Profile... 3-11 3.5 Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactor... 3-12 3.6 Methanol to Gasoline... 3-19 3.7 Gas to Liquids Processes... 3-20 4.1 Membrane Reactor Furnace for Dehydrogenation of Methane... 4-22 5.1 Basic New Porous Wall Reactor Concept... 5-2 5.2 Porous Wall Reactor Module... 5-3 5.3 Porous Wall Reactor Single Stage Process for Heat Removal... 5-4 5.4 Porous Wall Reactor Multi-Stage Process for Heat Removal... 5-5 5.5 Sintered Metal Filter-Unit Cell... 5-7 5.6 Layers of Unit Cells Forming Barrier Wall... 5-8 5.7 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate Conventional Falling Film Reactor Design... 5-12 5.8 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate New SRI Reactor Design... 5-29 vii

TABLES 2.1 Comparison of Design Parameters for the Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate... 2-3 2.2 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate Process Economics Comparison... 2-4 3.1 Innovative Reactors Patent Summary: Catalytic membrane Reactors... A-3 4.1 Inorganic Membrane Manufacturers... 4-3 4.2 Examples of Potential Applications For Dense Palladium Based Catalytic Membrane Reactors... 4-7 4.3 Examples of Potential Applications For Zeolite Based Catalytic Membrane Reactors... 4-14 4.4 Technical Barriers for Catalytic Membrane Reactors and Catalytic Distillations.. 4-17 4.5 R&D Needs for Catalytic Membrane Reactors and Catalytic Distillations... 4-18 4.6 Technical Specifications of Dehydrogenation Processes... 4-21 4.7 Commercial Processes for Producing Styrene from Ethylbenzene... 4-26 4.8 Styrene from Ethylbenzene by Adiabatic Dehydrogenation... 4-31 4.9 Ethylene from Ethane by Oxydehydrogenation... 4-32 4.10 Isobutylene from Isobutane by Oleflex Dehydrogenation... 4-33 4.11 Styrene from Ethylbenzene Membrane Reactors... 4-37 4.12 Ethylene from Ethane: Catalytic Membrane Reactors Variable Operating Costs... 4-38 4.13 Isobutylene from Isobutane: Membrane Reactors Variable Operating Costs... 4-39 4.14 Catalytic Membrane Reactors Economic Analysis Results... 4-40 5.1 Potential Porous Wall Reactor Applications by Reaction Class... 5-10 5.2 Potential Porous Wall Applications Product Reactions... 5-10 5.3 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Design Bases and Assumptions... 5-15 5.4 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Stream Flows... 5-17 viii

TABLES (concluded) 5.5 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Major Equipment... 5-19 5.6 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Utilities Summary... 5-20 5.7 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Total Capital Investment... 5-24 5.8 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Conventional Falling Film Reactor Production Costs... 5-25 5.9 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Design Bases and Assumptions... 5-30 5.10 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Stream Flows... 5-32 5.11 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Major Equipment... 5-33 5.12 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Utilities Summary... 5-34 5.13 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate Comparison of Reactor Design Parameters... 5-35 5.14 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Total Capital Investment... 5-37 5.15 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate: Porous Wall Reactor Production Costs... 5-38 5.16 Sulfonation of Methyl Laurate Cost Comparison... 5-41 ix