Informational Meeting- July 21, Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study

Similar documents
Informational Meeting- March 31, Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study

Supplemental Watershed Plan Agreement No. 10 for Neshaminy Creek Watershed Core Creek Dam (PA-620) Bucks County, Pennsylvania

III. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN. Bremo Power Station CCR Surface Impoundment: North Ash Pond INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

V. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Small Pond Approval. SWM MD-378 Pond Checklist Training 10/17/07. Exemptions EMBANKMENT HEIGHT. Height of Dam Weir Wall

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Looking at Dam Safety from a Resiliency Perspective. February 23, 2017

5.4 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

HYDROLOGY REPORT HEACOCK & CACTUS CHANNELS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2005 REVISED APRIL 2006 REVISED AUGUST 2006

Lyon Creek Cedar Way Stormwater Detention Dam Operation and Maintenance Manual

New Castle County, DE. Floodplain Regulations

Cokato Lake (86-263) Wright County. Hydrologic Investigation

Freight Street Development Strategy

Ponds. Pond A water impoundment made by excavating a pit, or constructing a dam or an embankment.

Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation

Project Drainage Report

Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study PLAN FORMULATION ADDENDUM

PARR HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT PARR HYDRO DEVELOPMENT & FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FERC PROJECT No SC SEPTEMBER 19, 2012

Flood Hazard Assessment Report Falls Gulch, Larimer County, Colorado January 16, 2013

June 22, Francis E. Borcalli, P.E.

Prepared for Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

PRESENTATION FOR THE POTENTIAL ADDITION OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN, GRADING, AND WATER QUALITY TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 402 STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 400-1

Mountain States Chapter International Erosion Control Association Conference

DES MOINES RIVER RESERVOIRS WATER CONTROL PLAN UPDATES IOWA ASCE WATER RESOURCES DESIGN CONFERENCE

Presentation Overview

IAFSM 2010 Annual Conference. City of Rockford Keith Creek Greenway Flood Mitigation Project

Chapter 12 Storage. Contents. Overview... 1

SECTION 3 DRAINAGE. 3-1 General. 3-2 Drainage Ordinances and Legal Requirements

CCR Rule Report: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan For Ash Basin B At Brayton Point Power Station

Appendix G Preliminary Hydrology Study

Notice No Closing Date: May 12, 2017

Will be modified map from GIS 6/16 EOD

Preliminary Drainage Analysis

Modeling a Complex Hydraulic Environment Using a 1-D Approach Supplemented with Simple 2-D Principles Manas Borah Ed Dickson June 5, 2014

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

Appendix J Hydrology and Hydraulics

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY

Presentation Overview

Farmington Dam Repurpose Project

United States Army Corps of Engineers. Addicks and Barker Dam Safety Update

THE CROSSROADS IN WINCHESTER 4. DRAINAGE PLAN. 4. Drainage Plan. a. Drainage Plan Description

Table of Contents. 5-5 Release Rates Year Allowable Release Rate WQCV Release Rate EURV Release Rate...

UMD Storm Water Program Construction Requirements. Greg Archer, MBA Environmental Compliance Specialist

Watershed size and name: The drainage area is acres. The pond is located within the Ohio River watershed. (2016 Inflow Design Plan)

CHOLLA POWER PLANT FLY ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_InflowFlood_002_

Phase II Report on Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Low Water Dams

Stream Reaches and Hydrologic Units

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Volume 2, Chapter 10 - Storage

CCR Certification: Initial Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for the

4.6 - Hydrology and Water Quality

TVA Colbert Fossil Facility Ash Disposal Pond 4

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

COUNTY OF KANE. Kishwaukee River Headwaters Study Stakeholder Meeting Monday, February 26, :30 am Hampshire Village Hall

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

CHAPTER 7. San Dieguito River Flooding Adaptation

Urban Hydrology Characteristics and their Influence on Urban Stream Restoration Technology. Presented by:

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan for Louisa Generating Station CCR Impoundment. MidAmerican Energy Company

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

10.0 Storm Sewer Systems

DRAFT. Jacob Torres, P.E.; Nick Fang, Ph.D., P.E.

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Hydrology and Flooding

Dam Safety & Planning: Examples of Collaboration and Lessons Learned

Peak discharge computation

City of Katy Flood Protection Study (Meeting 3 of 3) October 23, 2017

Local Flood Hazard Mitigation Program. A framework for hazard mitigation in the NYC West of Hudson Water Supply Watersheds

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

2A Stormwater Regulations and Permitting A. Iowa Drainage Law and Resources 1 B. Regulated Activities 1

SMALL HYDRO BIG CHALLENGES Renewable Energy World Asia 2016 Martin P. Bieri. September 21, 2016

NEW CASTLE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. through. (Name of Municipality) PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION DRAINAGE, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Flood Risk Management Project

Chehalis Basin Strategy Causes of Extreme Flooding. October 11, 2016 Policy Workshop

14 NATURAL HAZARDS Background Resource Management Issues

Staff Report. Agenda Item Title: 14-02: Northwest Santa Rosa Reorganization No Sequoia Park Associates, LP

Review Plan U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Kansas City District. Tuttle Creek Stilling Basin Wall Drain Repair Manhattan, Kansas

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA AND DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL SECTION 200 DRAINAGE PLANNING AND SUBMITTAL

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

ATTACHMENT C Design Analysis for Erosion Protection Cover for Piñon Ridge Tailing Cells

King County Flood Control District approves grants for flood prevention projects Regional projects to benefit from district funds

Instream Flows in the San Antonio River Basin From Science to Environmental flow Standards. Steven J. Raabe, P.E

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION OLD STATE HIGHWAY

POND CONSTRUCTION. Woodland Steward Series

South St. Vrain / Hall Meadows Restoration Planning August 20, 2015

CHOLLA POWER PLANT BOTTOM ASH POND INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN CH_Inflowflood_003_

Village of Mamaroneck Flood Mitigation Status Report

DAM SAFETY PRESENTATION REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DAM ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTS IN NEW YORK Allan Estivalet, PE

Developments in the Safety and Security of Mining Industry Dams

Transcription:

Informational Meeting- July 21, 2015 Boxelder B-2/B-3 Watershed Planning Study

Agenda Introductions Background & History Purpose & Need NRCS Watershed Planning Program Work Completed to Date Longer term tasks Questions/Discussions

Introductions NPIC Golder NRCS Guests sign-in sheet August 5, 2015 3

Watershed Dam B-2 August 5, 2015 4

Watershed Dam B-3 August 5, 2015 5

Watershed Description The Boxelder Creek Watershed covers approximately 260 square miles and extends into southeast Wyoming Portions of unicorporated Larimer County, Wellington, southeast Fort Collins and Timnath are located within the FEMA regulatory floodplain. The Lower Boxelder Valley is irrigated, and it contains some of the best agricultural land in the county The Lower Boxelder Basin has developed into an agribusiness and agriresearch corridor, which includes the Colorado State University Agricultural Research The lower, southern portion of the Basin is more urbanized and is impacted by many existing man-made structures, such as streets and buildings August 5, 2015 6

FEMA Regulatory Floodplains August 5, 2015 7

Watershed Map August 5, 2015 8

History of Flooding Boxelder Creek and its tributaries have a long history of flooding. An SCS report documents that from 1904 to 1969, there was a damaging flood every one to three years, on average, somewhere in the watershed. There have been 24 major documented storm events and numerous localized storms occurring over the irrigated land causing flooding and sediment and erosion damages as well. In 1947, the Coloradoan newspaper headline read, Violent Rainstorm Floods Large Area; Crop Losses Heavy. In this storm, as much as five inches of rain fell northwest of Wellington, damaging nearly 1,000 acres of grain, alfalfa, and corn as well as washing out bridges. In 1967, heavy rains again flooded the area, causing Boxelder Creek to overtop roads, which resulted in the death of a mother and her three daughters on a county road southeast of Wellington. Seven times that summer, county bridges in the Watershed were destroyed by flooding. August 5, 2015 9

Background & History 1971 - Original NRCSD Watershed Plan completed (original project sponsors included NPIC and local soil conservation districts) 1979 to 1982 - B-2 & B-3 constructed as part of a NRCS funded project that included five (5) dams constructed NPIC has retained maintenance of the facilities August, 2008 Boxelder Regional Stormwater Authority established 2009 NPIC received approval for partial NRCS funding to investigate rehabilitation of the two dams (with support from original project sponsors) 2009 to 2011 - NRCS completed updated hydrology and dam breach evaluations August 5, 2015 10

Background & History (cont.) March, 2011 Project Sponsors Meeting July, 2013 State of Colorado Department of Water Resources raised the hazard classification of both dams from Significant to High 2014 NRCS/NPIC agreed to funding of planning studies May, 2015 Watershed Planning Study Initiated August 5, 2015 11

Purpose & Need Dams were originally constructed to protect agricultural land from flooding Dams now protect developed portions within Larimer County, Wellington, Fort Collins and Timnath Hazard classification has been raised by the Colorado DWR from Significant to High Need to meet all current Colorado DWR and NRCS dam safety requirements Desire to maintain flood control benefits Minimize environmental, socio-economic and cultural resource impacts and damages August 5, 2015 12

Impact of New Hazard Classification Colorado Dam Safety Requirements: Inflow Design Flood (IDF) Significant Hazard: 50% PMP Event High Hazard: 90% PMP Event August 5, 2015 13

Existing Spillway Capacity - B2 Reinforced Concrete Lined Chute; 250 wide, 10 deep Existing Spillway Capacity ~ 17,820 cfs 100-year frequency event ~ 295 cfs (w/ dam); 17,500 cfs (w/o dam) 90% PMF Event (NRCS, 2010) 24-hour Duration Event ~ 248,800 cfs 6-hour Duration PMF ~ 350,800 cfs Dam Overtops by approx. 5-7 feet Sunny Day Dam Failure (NRCS, 2009) @ dam ~ 83,900 cfs @ Poudre River ~ 51,600 cfs August 5, 2015 14

Existing Spillway Capacity - B3 Uncontrolled Excavated Earth Channel; 400 wide, 8 deep Existing Spillway Capacity ~ 17,000 cfs 100-year Event ~ 175 cfs (w/ dam); 4,950 cfs (w/o dam) 90% PMF Event (NRCS, 2010) 24-hour Duration Event ~ 102,000 cfs 6-hour Duration PMF ~ 126,500 cfs Dam Overtops by approx. 5-7 feet Sunny Day Dam Failure (NRCS, 2011) @ dam ~ 54,500 cfs @ Poudre River ~ 23,500 cfs August 5, 2015 15

Regulatory Floodplain Benefits Dam Drainage Area (sq mi) Storage at Crest (acft) Q 100 without Dam (cfs) Q 100 with Dam (cfs) Breach Discharge (cfs) Residences in Breach Zone B-2 109 12,000 17,500 295 83,900 >1,000 B-3 61 6,410 4,950 175 54,500 >1,000 August 5, 2015 16

Dam Breach Inundation Maps August 5, 2015 17

Watershed Planning Study Components Phase 1: Collection and Analysis of Information (May-July, 2015) Collect and Review Existing Information Develop Purpose and Need, Work Plan and Public Participation Plan Environmental and Cultural Resources Assessment Hydrology/Hydraulic Evaluations Surveying Geotechnical Investigations Sediment Deposition Assessment Phase 2: Formulation and Evaluation of Alternatives (Aug-Dec, 2015) Formulate Alternatives (Public Meeting No. 1) Engineering Evaluations Alternatives Assessment (Environmental, Social and Economic Impacts) Preliminary Design Identification of Funding Mechanisms August 5, 2015 18

Watershed Planning Study Components (cont.) Phase 3: Watershed Plan Supplement Preparation (Jan-April, 2016) Preliminary Draft (NPIC/NRCS Colorado Review) Draft (NRCS/Public Review) (Public Meeting No. 2) Final August 5, 2015 19

Work Completed to Date Reviewed Previous Work Completed Developed Purpose and Need Statement Developed Work Plan Developed Public Participation Plan Performed Environmental and Cultural Resources Field Surveys (Environmental Evaluation) Commenced Hydrologic and Incremental Damage Assessment (IDA) Evaluations Commenced Embankment Stability Evaluations Commenced Sediment Deposition Evaluations August 5, 2015 20

Public Participation Plan Informational Meetings Public Meetings (2 scheduled; 1 end of August; 1 after draft plan) Web Page August 5, 2015 21

Environmental /Cultural Resources Assessments Summary Conducted environmental and cultural resources field surveys Initiated consultation and discussions with NRCS Environmental Staff Initiated Environmental Evaluation (EE) documentation August 5, 2015 23

Hydrologic Evaluations Summary NRCS PMF Evaluation (2010) NRCS Dam Breach Studies (2009-2011) Boxelder Stormwater Authority Hydrologic Assessments (updated 2014) Golder Incremental Damage Assessment Evaluations (on-going) August 5, 2015 24

Geotechnical Evaluations Summary Large amount of subsurface data exists for B-2 and B-3 collected as part of original design Embankments and structures appear to be in good condition Preliminary geotechnical stability evaluations indicate no issues with embankment stability in their current condition August 5, 2015 25

Work to Be Completed in Next 3-months Develop and Evaluate Alternatives Engineering Evaluations Socio-economic Assessments Prepare Environmental Evaluation (EE) Documents Public Meeting No. 1 Investigate Potential Funding Sources August 5, 2015 26

Alternatives to Be Considered No Action Decommissioning Modifications Spillway Upgrades Overtopping Roller-compacted Concrete Other Revetment August 5, 2015 27

Potential Cost Saving Solutions Incremental Damage Assessment: Decrease the Inflow Design Flood and associated magnitude of modifications required Alternative overtopping materials Geotextiles Articulated Concrete Blocks Increased spillway hydraulic efficiency Ogee/labrynith crest structures Fusegates Fuseplug August 5, 2015 28

Potential Funding Sources Project Sponsors Federal Agencies (NRCS) Stakeholders August 5, 2015 29

Discussion/Questions/Comments August 5, 2015 30