Behind the scenes of screening for SVHCs. Subtitle

Similar documents
Impact of PACT. RIEF IV Brussels 19 June Jánosi Amaya REACH manager Product Stewardship

Feedback from ECHA on dossier and substance evaluation

Endocrine discuptors under REACH

Update from ECHA. REACH Information and Experience Exchange Forum (RIEF IV) CEFIC 19 June 2015 Sheraton Brussels Airport Hotel

Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance - Update -

Risk management get ready

REGULATORY ACTIONS UNDER REACH & CLP FEEDBACK FROM ECHA S RAC

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

REACH: how to deal with 30,000 chemicals

FINAL DRAFT REACH: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND CURRENT WORK. ETRMA CRIA meeting Tyre Industry Regulatory Dialogue

Review of the List of restricted substances under RoHS II

REACH REGULATION: the new management of chemicals in Europe and operational tools. R egistration. E valuation. A Ch. uthorisation.

Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance

PLANNING FOR REACH 2018 AS A NON-EU COMPANY

REACHing the 2020 goals

Implementing REACH - Safer chemicals in Europe

Nanomaterials in REACH

REACH: What ITI members need to know to limit business risk

REACH Services. Global Service Provider to the Chemical Industry

REACH Compliance. (Registration, Evaluation, Restriction and Authorization of Chemicals) New EU Legislation

Exploring Communication in the Supply Chain under REACH Authorisation process

Work Programme Working for the safe use of chemicals across the EU

Registration and evaluation what s done and what s ahead

ECHA 1(7) Helsinki, 19 May 2014

REACH. Main concerns resulting from the implementation of REACH. Within the Aerospace Defence and Security business VERSION 1.5

Evaluation under REACH

Data Submission Manual Part 05 - How to complete a technical dossier for registrations and PPORD notifications Data Submission Manual

16361/14 AM/am 1 DG E 1A

AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF PENTADECAFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN

REACH special subject: communication between companies

Impact of the REACH Regulation (EC) n 1907/2006

Best practices on physicochemical and substance identity information for nanomaterials

Petroleum Products in the REACH Regulation Klaas den Haan, Stewardship Conference, SCL 1 June 2015

Contents Page 1. Introduction Context of this Document How to use this Guidance Overview of REACH

Prepared in the framework of the Study for the Review of the List of Restricted Substances under RoHS2 Reference: ENV.C.

CLP-REACH main obligations on industry

Review of the List of restricted substances under RoHS II

REACH and RoHS updates for EU and Asia Pacific countries Mike McNally Antea Group

10098/16 AM/mb 1 DG E 1A

REACH A Jotun Perspective

Principles of REACH. Andrew Fasey AIHce 2006 Chicago, USA 16 May 2006

Preparations for the 2018 REACH Registration deadline 48 th Meeting of the Management Board December 2017

Current challenges from Evaluation point of view - Introduction case studies

Study on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, not regulated by the RoHS Directive

HBCD Factsheet. Brominated Flame retardant October Hexabromocyclododecane

REACH&CLP: CURRENT STATUS AND NEXT STEPS OF THE DIFFERENT PROCEDURES

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

AmCham EU s response to the second stakeholder consultation on RoHS II

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The EU REACH Regulation

Guidance on Socio-Economic Analysis Restrictions

Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation of CHemicals (REACH)

Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment

Micromega: REACH for Nanomaterials

Formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers - Strategy for future work

Minutes December 2016

REACh How does it affect the pharmaceutical industry? Consideration of the issue for a medium-sized enterprise.

Responses to Comments Document (RCOM) on ECHA s Draft 3rd Recommendation for the Group of recommended Chromium (VI) Substances

BASTA Methods of Calculation for substances with human toxicity and environmentally hazardous properties

An Illustrative Example of a CSR

Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment

Webinar - REACH Registration 2018

Integrated Testing Strategies for REACH. Perspective from the European Chemicals Agency

GPS Safety Summary. Substance Name: ETHYLENE DIMETHACRYLATE

Guideline on the implementation of. European Regulation (EC) 1272/2008

Analysis of Alternatives and Socio-Economic Analysis

Application of CSM on risk assessment at SBB

Global Product Strategy CHÉMIA 2014 Liptovský Ján, September 2014

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

What does it mean for US Businesses, Sustainable Chemistry and Product Design?

Collection of chemical substance content information

of the indoor paint or varnish

Closing remarks. Seminar on applications for authorisation 17 June Tomas Öberg Chair of Socio-economic Analysis Committee ECHA

Perspectives and Challenges of the Woodworking Industries in Europe Joint CEI-Bois / EFBWW / EPF Project

ECHA policy for prevention of conflicts of interest

Substance name: Aluminosilicate Refractory Ceramic Fibres EC number: - CAS number: -

Environmental assessment of metals and inorganics under REACH. Marta Sobanska, European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki

Exposure Assessment Choosing the Right Approach

Study for the Review of the List of Restricted Substances under RoHS2

Usage of (eco)toxicological data for bridging data gaps between and grouping of nanoforms of the same substance. Elements to consider

Safety data sheet according to 1907/2006/EC, Article 31

A study to gather insights on the drivers, barriers, costs and benefits for updating REACH registration and CLP notification dossiers

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

Product Prioritization

Chemical Safety Assessment under REACH: how Chesar can help registrants. Chemical watch Roberta Bernasconi, Conny Hoekzema, Hélène Magaud

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

Revision Date Version 1.4 Print Date SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking.

Draft agreed by Environmental Risk Assessment Working Party (ERAWP) 31 May Adopted by CVMP for release for consultation 12 July 2012

Safety data sheet. according to 1907/2006/EC, Article 31. Printing date Version number 1

Chemical Risk Services

FEASIBILITY OF A MATERIALS INFORMATION PLATFORM AND THE WAY FORWARD

REACH REGISTRATION 2018 WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE COMPLIANCE DEADLINE International Aerospace Environmental Group. All rights reserved.

SAFETY DATA SHEET CREAM CLEANSER

Requirements for substances in articles

Vragen publieke consultatie inclusief antwoorden (afgestemd tussen I&M, VWS, NVWA en RIVM) 1. Respondent s information. 1.

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

An introduction to socioeconomic analysis in the REACH authorisation process

Priorities for the EU Gas Industry Emilie Marinova Senior Economic Manager, EUROGAS

Transcription:

Behind the scenes of screening for SVHCs Subtitle Behind the scenes of screening for SVHCs RIEF IV - 19 June

Contents 1. Short background 2. Screening for SVHCs 3. Timelines 4. What happens at RiME 5. Take home messages Behind the scenes of screening for SVHCs RIEF IV - 19 June

To refresh: the goal of the SVHC Roadmap Assessment of all relevant substances of very high concern (SVHCs) in line with Art.57 of REACH by 2020 via a Risk Management Options Analysis (RMOA) Increase transparency for Industry, Civil Society Organisations and the general public regarding the selection and assessment of SVHCs 3

From potential SVHC to SVHC where are we? Identification of Identification potential of potential SVHCs SVHCs Risk Management Option Analysis (RMOA) Preparation Annex XV dossier SVHC Comitology decision SVHC on Annex XIV Start process prioritizing SVHC for Annex XIV Candidate listing SVHC PACT Publication RMOA intention in Public Activity Coordination Tool 4 Publication Annex XIV Authorization request by Industry

Screening for potential SVHCs IT Screening Manual Screening Risk Management Option Analysis (RMOA) Preparation Annex XV dossier SVHC 5

Hazard based selection the Masterlist 1. Registered for non-intermediate use (art. 6; including impurities, constituents or additives ) with: harmonized classification CLP Cat.1 (CMR, Sens, STOT RE) Self classification CLP Cat.1 (CMR, STOT RE) Substances with an indication for: Endocrine disruptive properties (i.e. EC-, WHO-, SIN-list, ) Persistency or bioaccumulative behaviour (i.e. Log K ow, BCF, T, ) Non-classified but structurally similar to the above 2. Registered for intermediate use (art 17 and 18) or non-registered substances with a harmonized classification under CLP (see above) and that are at the same time structurally related to the above. 6

Exposure based prioritization the Shortlist - All substances from the Master list that may comply to the art 57 SVHC criteria based on their hazardous properties and that also score relatively high on: - produced tonnage - wide dispersive use - potential for environmental exposure - potential for human exposure Joint exercise between ECHA and Member States to develop screening scenario s 7

Most important to realize The SVHC Roadmap aims at the identification of potential SVHCs Screening is primarily based on registration dossier (IUCLID) Hazard is the leading selection criterion for potential SVHCs Exposure related information is the leading prioritization criterion for potential SVHCs It is essential that the registration dossier reflects the most recent toxicity information and actual uses 8

January February March April May June July August September October November December Time line of SVHC-prioritization - Master list - Short list Substance Selection by Member States Manual Screening by Member States RMOAs Evaluating and further development screening scenarios 9

From screening to SVHC Conducting a RMOA 1. Select a substance of pot. concern - SVHC Shortlist, other Discuss at RiME 2. Perform a pre-assessment Manual screening (IUCLID, CSR Pub-med ) 4. Discuss draft RMOA with other MSCAs 3. Start RMOA No Action, CCH, SEv - Contact IND for additional info - Discuss and conclude on draft RMOA at Member State level 5. Conclude RMOA 6. Conclusion on ACT 7. Non-conf. on PACT 10

Risk Management Expert Group (RiME) Forum to discuss most appropriate - risk management options for potential SVHCs Participation: EU-Member States, the EU commission and ECHA Main aim is: - To give (non-binding and off the record ) advice - To share knowledge and experiences related to risk management - Exchange views on possible ways to best manage concerns/risks - Where possible seek, common understanding or a harmonized approach - When appropriate, initiate collaboration Informal meeting No fixed mandate or predefined scope No official status, no minutes 11

What ECHA communicates on the SVHC Roadmap Means of communication Content Website Description of screening approaches Annual report on SVHC Roadmap implementation SVHC Roadmap dedicated section on the ECHA website http://echa.europa.eu/addressing-chemicals-ofconcern/substances-of-potential-concern Yearly update possible; http://www.echa.europa.eu/addressingchemicals-of-concern/substances-of-potential-concern/svhcroadmap-implementation-plan 1. Progress made on the implementation of the Roadmap 2. Planned activities for the upcoming year Public Activities Coordination Tool (PACT) Registry of Intentions (ROI) Summarizing all substance specific activities: ongoing and follow-up; http://www.echa.europa.eu/addressing-chemicals-ofconcern/substances-of-potential-concern/svhc-roadmapimplementation-plan/pact Follow-up risk management actions (SVHC, Restriction, CLH); http://www.echa.europa.eu/web/guest/addressing-chemicalsof-concern/registry-of-intentions 12

To take home Discussing Screening and RMOAs Authorities take the registration dossier (including the CSR) at face value; The registration dossier is the basis for Screening and RMOA. The information in there is the only one to be taken into account; Concern for hazard is leading for Screening and RMOA; Information on exposure is critical to prioritization in Screening and assess the most appropriate RMOA; When exposure data do not reflect reality substances may be selected for unjust reasons; When exposure data are too limited to identify specific risks: Targeted restriction under REACH is no option; When Exposure data are too limited to exclude concerns: RMOA based on reasonable worst case assumptions often leading to the authorization route as most appropriate regulatory option! 13

Thank You Dr. Fleur van Broekhuizen Bureau REACH National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) tel. +31-30-274 8633 E-mail: fleur.van.broekhuizen@rivm.nl 14