Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

Similar documents
Advanced Coal Technology 101

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Gasification: A Key Technology Platform for Western Canada s Coal and Oil Sands Industries

Coal based IGCC technology

Smart CHP from Biomass and Waste

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Process Economics Program

2.0. IGCC TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

Introduction: Thermal treatment

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants

J-POWER s CCT Activities

Author: Andrea Milioni Chemical Engineer On Contract Cooperator University UCBM Rome (Italy)

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

Siemens Gasification and IGCC Update

BLUE OPTION White space is filled with one or more photos

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Worldwide Pollution Control Association. August 3-4, 2010

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

UOP Selexol TM Technology Applications for CO 2 Capture

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY IN THE USE OF COAL

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by NICK KORENS ROBERT W. VAN SCOY. January private report by the PARK, CALIFORNIA

ANALYSIS OF POWER GENERATION PROCESSES USING PETCOKE

Gasification of lignite coal in North America; Past experience and future opportunities

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

IGCC Plants : a Practical Pathway for Combined Production of Hydrogen and Power from Fossil Fuels

The Effects of Operation Parameters on the Performance of Entrained-bed Pulverized Coal Gasifier with High Fusion Temperature Coal

Production of synthesis gas from liquid or gaseous hydrocarbons, and the synthesis gas per se, are covered by group C01B 3/00.

Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste

Chapter 3 Coal-Based Electricity Generation

An Update On Shell Licensed Gasification Projects and the Performance of Pernis IGCC

Development of the Highly Durable COS Hydrolysis Catalyst for IGCC Gas Clean-up System

Three-dimensional modelling of steam-oxygen gasification in a circulating fluidized bed

A LEADING PROVIDER OF CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Rectisol Wash Units Acid Gas Removal for Polygeneration Concepts downstream Gasification

GTI Gasification and Gas Processing R&D Program

Coal Gasification Renewed technology options to exploit Europe s coal reserves. Brussels, November 13, 2013

Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems

A Parametric Investigation of Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with Carbon Capture

Comparison of Sludge Treatment by Gasification vs. Incineration

COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

Topsoe s Emission Management Solution--DeNOx

Advanced Coal Technologies for Power Generation

Testing and Feasibility Study of an Indirectly Heated Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier

Carbon To X. Processes

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

PRENFLO TM for biomass and coal (co-) gasification by Max Heinritz-Adrian

PLASMA GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR HAZADOUS WASTE. Waste2Tricity Internaltional (Thailand) Co., Ltd

Enabling a Brighter Tomorrow: E-Gas TM Gasification

Technical and Economic Evaluation of a 70 MWe Biomass IGCC Using Emery Energy s Gasification Technology

WRI S PRE GASIFICATION TREATMENT OF PRB COALS FOR IMPROVED ADVANCED CLEAN COAL GASIFIER DESIGN

A REVIEW OF THE APPLICABILITY OF INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE IN SOUTH AFRICA. Fulufhelo Confidence (Nelwamondo) Makananise P

The Progress of Osaki CoolGen Project

Pyrolysis and Gasification

ADVANCED CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY FOR POWER GENERATION-

Fluor s Econamine FG Plus SM Technology For CO 2 Capture at Coal-fired Power Plants

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Evaluation of Hydrogen Production at Refineries in China. The new UOP SeparALL TM Process. Bart Beuckels, UOP NV

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION

SOME ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES IN JAPAN

Member State Perspectives PROMOTING HIGH- EFFICIENCY LOW-EMISSION COAL POWER PLANTS JAPAN

GE Energy. Advancements in Gasification Technology Allan Connolly, General Manager of Gasification Technology October 12, 2005

Gasification of Residue as a Source of Hydrogen for Refining Industry in India

Synthesis Gas Production from Biomass

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

C R. ombustion esources, Inc. Evaluation of Stratean Inc. Gasifier System. 18 March Consultants in Fuels, Combustion, and the Environment

We accept the challenge!

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES 2003

Feasibility of Partial Upgrading of Athabasca Bitumen. Jim Colyar, Technology Consultant Colyar Consultants October 2010

Mr. Daniel has authored a gasification patent and represents GE on the Gasification Technologies Council.

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

ADECOS II. Advanced Development of the Coal-Fired Oxyfuel Process with CO 2 Separation

Panel II Jänschwalde Oxyfuel demonstartion plant.

Coupling gasification and metallurgical applications

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

The Future of IGCC Technology CCPC-EPRI IGCC Roadmap Results

Energy-Crop Gasification

Research Activities on Oxyfuel Combustion at IVD, Universität Stuttgart

Gasification Technologies

Sandhya Eswaran, Song Wu, Robert Nicolo Hitachi Power Systems America, Ltd. 645 Martinsville Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

PRODUCTION OF SYNGAS BY METHANE AND COAL CO-CONVERSION IN FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Emissions Calculations - Stack

HIGH PUITY CARBON MONOXIDE FROM A FEED GAS ARNOLD KELLER AND RONALD SCHENDEL KINETICS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA

Carpet Waste Gasification:

Stationary source emissions control

Coal gasification and CO 2 capture

Pyrolysis and Gasification Appendices

Customized Solutions for Environmental Compliance. Combining proven experience, technology and reliable performance for our customers

State of the Gasification Industry: Commercial Applications & Research and Development

Thermodynamic Analysis of Coal to Synthetic Natural Gas Process

Ion Transport Membrane (ITM) Technology for Lower-Cost Oxygen Production

Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap

Gasification of Non-Coking Coals

with Physical Absorption

Transcription:

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants Thomas F. Edgar University of Texas-Austin IEAGHG International CCS Summer School July, 2014 1

Introduction 2

CO 2 Absorption/Stripping of Power Plant Flue Gas Use 30% of power plant output Flue Gas With 90% CO 2 Removal Absorber Stripper LP Steam CO2 for Transport & Storage Flue Gas In Rich Solvent Lean Solvent 3

The Basic Chemistry of Gasification For example: C x H y + H 2 O + O 2 ah 2 + xco 4 CH + 2 H 2 O + O 2 4 H 2 + 4 CO (Hydrocarbon) (Water) (Oxygen) (Hydrogen) (Carbon Monoxide) Water Shift Reaction: CO + H 2 O => CO 2 + H 2 Source: GE 4

Combustion vs. Gasification Combustion SO 2 is scrubbed out of stack gas reacted with limestone to form gypsum NO x controlled with low NO x burners and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) Fly ash removed via ESP or bag filters Hg can be removed by contacting flue gas with activated carbon Gasification H 2 S removed from syngas and converted to solid sulfur or sulfuric acid (Claus Process) NH 3 washes out of gas with water, thermal NO x controlled by diluent injection, optional SCR for deeper NO x removal Ash converted to inert glassy slag >90% of Hg removed by passing high pressure syngas thru activated carbon bed 5

6

FutureGen Plant Schematic Syngas H 2 http://www.psenterprise.com/consulting/r_and_d/images/vpdm_futuregen.png 7

Coal Gasification Emissions Sulfur in coal reduced to H 2 S Elemental sulfur is recovered salable product 99.4% removal efficiencies, no sludge Nitrogen in fuel is converted to N 2, NH 3, and small amounts of HCN Metals either contained in glasslike slag or water stream 10x fewer air emissions 15-20% less CO 2 due to increased efficiencies 8

IGCC vs. Conventional Pulverized Coal Combustion (PCC) 20-50% lower water usage, compared to PCC CO 2 under pressure takes less energy to remove than from PCC flue gas (Gas volume is <1% of flue gas from same MW size PCC) 9

IGCC with CO 2 Capture 1 Fuel is gasified and a synthesis gas is produced. The gas primarily consists of CO, H 2, and H 2 O. Source: VATTENFALL 10

IGCC with CO 2 Capture 2 The synthesis gas is cleaned from residuals. Source: VATTENFALL 11

IGCC with CO 2 Capture 3 The CO and H 2 O are converted in a shift reactor to CO 2 and H 2. Source: VATTENFALL 12

IGCC with CO 2 Capture 4 The gas is cleaned from sulfur after the shift reactor. Source: VATTENFALL 13

IGCC with CO 2 Capture 5 Carbon dioxide is separated from the synthesis gas in an absorption process. The carbon dioxide is transported to a storage site. The remaining gas (mainly hydrogen) is combusted. Source: VATTENFALL 14

1st Generation Gasifiers 1. TYPE OF BED 2. OPERATING PRESSURE 3. SLAGGING, NON-SLAGGING LURGI (FIXED BED, HIGH P, NON-SLAGGING) KOPPERS-TOTZEK (ENTRAINED BED, LOW P, SLAGGING) WELLMAN-GALUSHA (FIXED, LOW P, NON-SLAGGING) WINKLER (FLUIDIZED, LOW P, NON-SLAGGING) 15

16

Kellog Brown and Root (KBR) 17

Current Gasifier Types Manufacturer Gasifier type Application ConocoPhillips General Electric Energy (GE) Kellog Brown and Root (KBR) Mitsubishi Heavy Industry (MHI) Shell Coal- water slurry feed, Oxygen blown, refractory lined gasifier Coal-water slurry feed, O 2 blown, refractory lined gasifier dry feed, air blown transport reactor dry feed, air blown dry feed, coal is crushed, dried and fed into gasifier, oxygen blown, waterwall in gasifier wide range of coal bituminous coal, petcoke or blend of pet coke with low rank coal low rank coal low rank coal wide variety of feedstock 18

IGCC Plants in the US The Tampa Electric IGCC Project Mulberry, Florida, 1996 Using: GE Energy Gasification Output: 250 MWe The Wabash River IGCC Project West Terre Haute, Indiana, 1995 Using: The ConocoPhillips E-Gas Gasification process Output: 262 MWe 19

Implementing New Technologies Advanced Gasification Transport Gasifier in oxygen-blown mode Oxygen Separation Advanced ion transport membranes Hydrogen Production Membrane separation from CO 2 Gas Cleanup Remove sulfur, mercury, chlorides, ammonia Hydrogen Turbines Fuel Cells 20

Theoretical Limit Ceramic Vanes and Blades Ceramic Vanes Precooled Air Conventional Cooling IGCC station performance 21

Efficient Pollutant Removal Boiler Carbon Injection WESP Pre-Combustion PM, Hg, Su SCR ESP/ FF FF FGD CO 2 IGCC Gasification cleans the syngas before combustion High pressure & low volume provide favorable economics for pollutant removal IGCC offers increased fuel diversity, reduced emissions, and increased siting & permitting flexibility Pulverized coal Pollutants are removed after the coal is burned The gas volume treated is 300 times the gas volume of an IGCC plant Combustion produces large quantities of waste & consumes more water than IGCC Source: GE 22

IGCC Concluding Remarks Gasification is a well-known process The CO 2 is separated and the decarbonized gaseous fuel is used for the gas turbine Advantages Proven CO 2 separation technology Co-production of hydrogen for power and/or other uses Disadvantages IGCC is unfamiliar technology for electrical utilities IGCC without CO 2 capture has generally higher costs than pulverized coal combustion but could change in the future for new plants/new technology 23