City of Vancouver October 11, 2017 Suite West 10 th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 48A

DST Consulting Engineers Inc. Unit B 4125 McConnell Drive Burnaby, British Columbia Office: 604.436.4588 City of Vancouver October 11, 2017 Suite 300 515 West 10 th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 48A Attention: Subject: Ms. Rebecca Yanciw Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Materials Assessment of 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 1.0 INTRODUCTION DST Consulting Engineers Inc. (DST) was retained by the City of Vancouver to conduct a pre-renovation hazardous building material assessment of the Municipal Building located at 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia (referred to hereafter as the Subject Building). The assessment was limited to include the Main Floor North East areas where the renovation will occur (referred to hereafter as the Subject Areas). The assessment was conducted by Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) certified building inspectors, Philip Pow of DST, on September 27 th and September 28 th, 2017. This report outlines the scope of work, regulations, methodologies, findings of the assessment, and based on those findings, states conclusions and appropriate recommendations. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The pre-renovation hazardous building materials assessment focused on suspect asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs) and lead-based coatings (LBCs), including a detailed inspection, sampling, and analysis of samples. The assessment also included a visual inspection for ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), elemental mercury, sources of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical equipment, and other hazardous materials, not limited to include mould contamination, rodent and bird droppings, used needles, etc. DST Consulting Engineers Inc.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 2 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 3.0 REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Provincial Regulations In British Columbia, the management of hazardous building materials in the work place is regulated by WorkSafeBC under the Workers Compensation Act (effective April 15, 1998), as amended by the Workers Compensation (Occupational Health and Safety) Amendment Act (effective October 1, 1999). Specific requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Amendment Act are prescribed in the British Columbia Occupational Health and Safety (BC OH&S) Regulation. 3.1.1. Hazardous Materials & Demolition/Renovations Section 20.112 of the BC OH&S Regulation details the requirements that employers and owners are responsible for before beginning work on the demolition, renovation or salvage of machinery, equipment, buildings, or structures. The employer or owner must: Inspect the site to identify any asbestos, lead and/or other potentially hazardous materials that may be handled, disturbed, or removed; Have the inspection results available at the worksite; and, Ensure that the hazardous materials are safely contained or removed. 3.1.2. Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ACMs are regulated under Part 6 (sections 6.1 to 6.32) of the BC OH&S Regulation. WorkSafeBC s manual, Safe Handling of Asbestos, A Manual of Standard Practices, outlines basic information on asbestos and asbestos products, health hazards requirements for worker protection, safe work procedures and principles that should be followed in selecting the most suitable technique for the safe abatement of ACMs. This document provides a guide to current practices that are to be followed in the Province of British Columbia. 3.1.3. Lead-Based Coatings (LBCs) Sections 6.59 to 6.69 of the BC OH&S Regulation describe specific requirements for workplace exposure to lead. WorkSafeBC s manual, Lead-Containing Paints and Coatings Preventing Exposure in the Construction Industry, provides a guide to current practices that are to be followed in the Province of British Columbia, providing basic information on lead and lead products, health hazards and DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 3 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 requirements for worker protection, safe work procedures and principles that should be followed in selecting the most suitable technique for the safe abatement of lead. 3.1.4. Elemental Mercury Mercury-containing equipment is regulated under Part 5, section 5.49 of the BC OH&S Regulation. 3.1.5. Hazardous Wastes In British Columbia, environmental matters pertaining to waste generally fall under the jurisdiction of the British Columbia Ministry of Environment (MoE), pursuant to the Environmental Management Act. The key waste regulation under the Environmental Management Act relating to hazardous building materials is the Hazardous Waste Regulation (HWR), as amended from time to time. The HWR provides the requirements for the proper handling, storage, transportation, treatment, recycling and disposal of hazardous wastes in the province. The regulation also outlines the materials and criteria to be used to characterize waste as hazardous. Applicable Federal Legislation 3.2.1. Halocarbon and Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Halocarbon and Ozone Depleting substances are regulated under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), Federal Halocarbon Regulations, 2003, (SOR/2003-289). 3.2.2. Transportation of Dangerous Goods The transportation of hazardous wastes is governed under the Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) Act and Regulations which outline the requirements for storage, handling, and transportation of hazardous waste, amongst other products. 4.0 METHODOLOGY Suspect hazardous building materials were visually identified based on the surveyor's knowledge of historical composition of building products. Visual identification of materials suspected to contain asbestos or lead (in coatings) were supported by the analysis of representative samples. Suspect ACM samples were analyzed for asbestos content at AASL, by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), following NIOSH Method 9002. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 4 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Suspect LBC samples were analyzed for lead content at Maxxam Analytics, by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), following EPA 6010c R3 m. Painted surfaces that were identified to contain a concentration of lead equal to or greater than 90 mg/kg were classified as having a hazardous level of lead and were considered a LBC. Suspected ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), elemental mercury and sources of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were visually identified based on appearance, age, and knowledge of historic applications/locations. 5.0 FINDINGS The following sections outline the findings of DST s hazardous building material assessment. Certificates of analysis are provided in Appendix I of this report. Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Through the assessment, forty-one (41) samples of suspect ACMs were collected and analyzed for asbestos content. Descriptions of the materials analyzed for asbestos content, their sample point locations, and the results of analysis are summarized in Table 1, below. Table 1: Analysis of Suspect ACMs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Sample Description Asbestos Content Condition AS- ODW1 Resident s Café South Wall (2 nd Layer) Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile Good AS- ODW2 Kitchen South Ceiling Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS- ODW3 Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room North Wall Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile MODERATE AS- ODW4 Lounge North Wall Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS- ODW6 Women s Washroom South Wall Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 5 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 1: Analysis of Suspect ACMs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Sample Description Asbestos Content Condition AS- ODW7 East Area Storage Room West Wall Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile MODERATE AS- ODW8 East Filler Room Ceiling Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile Poor AS-T1 East Area Storage Room Ceiling Texture and Stucco None Detected N/A AS-T2 East Area Storage Room Ceiling Texture and Stucco None Detected N/A AS-T3 East Area Storage Room Ceiling Texture and Stucco None Detected N/A AS-PI1 Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room ½ Pipe Pipe Elbow Insulation 40 60 % Chrysotile Good AS-PI2 Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room ½ Pipe Pipe Insulation None Detected N/A AS-PI3 Kitchen Ceiling Pipe Paper Fibreglass Pipe Insulation None Detected N/A AS-PI4 Kitchen Ceiling ¼ Pipe Pipe Insulation None Detected N/A AS-PI5 Program and Services Room Ceiling Paperback Insulation None Detected N/A AS-CT1 Resident s Café - Ceiling 1.5 x1.5 Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A AS-CT2 Resident s Café - Ceiling 4 x1 Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 6 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 1: Analysis of Suspect ACMs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Sample Description Asbestos Content Condition AS-CT3 Kitchen Ceiling ½ Thick Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A AS-CT4 Kitchen Ceiling Thin Top Layer Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A AS-CT5 Kitchen Ceiling Thin 2 nd Layer Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A AS-CT6 Resident s Café Ceiling 2 x2 Acoustic Tile None Detected N/A AS-P1 Resident s Cafe West Wall Skimcoat None Detected N/A AS-P2 Resident s Café East Wall Skimcoat None Detected N/A AS-P3 South Hallway South Wall Skimcoat None Detected N/A AS-DW1 Kitchen West Wall Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS-DW2 Resident s Café South Wall Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS-DW3 Laundry Room Ceiling Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS-DW4 Programs and Services Space North Wall Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A AS-DW5 Lounge East Wall Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile Good DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 7 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 1: Analysis of Suspect ACMs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Sample Description Asbestos Content Condition AS-DW6 East Area Washroom West Wall Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile Good AS-DW7 Lounge North Wall Drywall Joint Compound 1 5 % Chrysotile Good AS-Mas1 Resident s Cafe Windows Grey Mastic 1 10 % Chrysotile Good AS-Mas2 Resident s Cafe Windows Grey Mastic 1 10 % Chrysotile Good AS-Mas3 Resident s Cafe Windows Grey Mastic 1 10 % Chrysotile Good AS-G1 Men s Washroom West Wall Beige Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A AS-G2 Resident s Café Floor Blue Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A AS-G3 Women s Washroom East Wall Green-Grey Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A AS-G4 Kitchen Floor Red Ceramic Tile Grout (Lab Identified Product to be Residual Drywall Joint Compound) 1 5 % Chrysotile Good AS-G5 Exterior West Wall Orange Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A AS-G6 Exterior South Entrance Wall Grey Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 8 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 1: Analysis of Suspect ACMs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Sample Description Asbestos Content Condition AS-G7 East Area Storage Floor Blue Ceramic Tile Grout None Detected N/A Note: Bold print indicates an asbestos-containing material. Based on the analytical sample results listed above, the following ACMs were identified within the Subject Areas: Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the Resident s Cafe ; Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room; Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the East Area Storage Room; Drywall Joint Compound in the ceiling of the East Filler Room; ½ Pipe Elbow Insulation in the Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room; Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the Lounge; Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the East Area Washroom; Grey Mastic in the windows of the Resident s Café; and Red Ceramic Tile Grout in the Floor of the Kitchen. The laboratory identified this material to be drywall joint compound debris and confirmed asbestos was not detected in the ceramic tile grout. Unless further sampling and analysis is conducted, drywall joint compound throughout the Subject Areas should be considered-containing. The following ACMs identified were noted to be in MODERATE or POOR condition at the time of the assessment: Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the East Area Storage Room; Drywall Joint Compound in the ceiling of the East Filler Room; and, Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room. The remaining ACMs were observed to be in GOOD condition at the time of the assessment. Lead-Based Coatings (LBCs) Through the assessment, twenty eight (28) samples of suspect LBCs were analyzed for lead content. Descriptions of the materials analyzed for lead content, their sample locations, and the results of analysis are summarized in Table 2, below. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 9 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 2: Analysis of Suspect LBCs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. Sample Location Material/Color Location Result (mg/kg) Lead- Based Coating Condition LB-1 Exterior Grey Ceramic Tile South Entrance Walls 18.7 No N/A LB-2 Exterior Orange Ceramic Tile West Wall 9.9 No N/A LB-3 Women s Washroom Green Grey Ceramic Tile West Wall 287 YES GOOD LB-4 East Are Storage Room Blue Ceramic Tile Floor <3.0 No N/A LB-5 East Area Cream and Brown Paint West Wall 3260 YES MODERATE LB-6 Men Washroom Cream Ceramic Tile West Wall <3.0 No N/A LB-7 Resident s Cafe Grey Ceramic Tile Floor 15.2 No N/A LB-8 Janitor Room Light Grey Ceramic Tile West Wall 162 YES GOOD LB-9 Women s Washroom Multi-Color Ceramic Tiles Floor <3.0 No N/A LB-10 Janitor Room Lighter Grey Ceramic Tile North Wall 87.3 No N/A LB-11 Exterior Blue Grey Paint Throughout 7000 YES GOOD LB-12 Exterior Off-White Paint Textured Ceilings 26.8 No N/A LB-13 Exterior Green Paint West Wall by Door 5.9 No N/A LB-14 Exterior Glossy Grey Paint Ceiling by South Entrance 224 YES GOOD LB-15 Residents Café White, Orange, and Green Paint East Wall <3.0 No N/A DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 10 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Table 2: Analysis of Suspect LBCs 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Sample I.D. LB-16 LB-17 LB-19 Sample Location Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room Kitchen Kitchen East Storage Material/Color Location Result (mg/kg) Lead- Based Coating Condition White Paint South Wall 80.3 No N/A Orange, Green, and Cream Paint Metal Beam 722 YES POOR Green Paint East Wall 1050 YES GOOD LB-20 Kitchen Cream Paint South Ceiling 1520 YES GOOD LB-21 Kitchen Black Paint Door 288 YES GOOD LB-22 Program and Services Bright Blue Paint West Wall 14 No N/A LB-23 Program and Services Grey Paint West Wall <6.0 No N/A LB-24 Resident Café Blue Grey Paint Floor 19.2 No N/A LB-25 South Hallway White Paint South Wall 42.8 No N/A LB-26 Men s Washroom Grey Ceramic Tile West Wall 3.1 No N/A LB-27 LB-28 East Filler Room East Filler Room Green Paint Pipe 20700 YES Good White Paint East Wall 177 YES POOR LB-29 Kitchen Red Ceramic Tile Floor 3.2 No N/A Notes: Bold print indicates a coating containing potentially hazardous levels of lead (i.e. a lead-based coating). Based on the analytical sample results listed above, the following LBCs were identified within the Subject Areas: Green Grey Ceramic Tiles on the walls of the Women s Washroom; Cream and Brown Paints in the walls of the East Area; DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 11 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Light Grey Ceramic Tiles in the walls of the Janitor s Room; Blue Grey Paint on the walls throughout the Exterior; Glossy Grey Paint in the ceiling by the South Entrance on the Exterior; Orange, Green and Cream Paints on the metal beam in the Kitchen; Green Paint on the walls of the East Storage of the Kitchen; Cream Paint in the south ceiling of the Kitchen; Black Paint on the door of the Kitchen; Green Paint on the pipe in the East Filler Room; and, White Paint on the walls of the East Filler Room. The following LBCs identified in Sitting Room 201 were noted to be in POOR condition at the time of the assessment: Orange, Green and Cream Paints on the metal beam in the Kitchen; and, White Paint on the walls of the East Filler Room. All other LBCs identified in the Subject Areas were noted to be in GOOD or MODERATE condition at the time of the assessment. Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs) ODS containing equipment was not identified within the Subject Area at the time of the assessment. Elemental Mercury Mercury containing fluorescent light tubes were identified in the Subject Building. Mercury containing equipment was noted to be in GOOD condition at the time of the assessment. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Suspect PCB containing lamp ballasts were identified within the Subject Building. Suspect PCB containing lamp ballasts were noted to be in GOOD condition at the time of the assessment. Other Hazardous Materials Visible mould contamination was in the East Areas and the East Filler Room of the Subject Building. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 12 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Rodent droppings were observed in the wall cavity in the Kitchen East Storage Room within the Subject Building. Used needles were observed surrounding the exterior of the Subject Building. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the site assessment, sampling and analysis, the following hazardous building materials were identified within the Subject Building: ACMs; LBCs; Elemental Mercury; Suspect PCBs; Rodent Droppings; and, Used Needles. Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Based on the MODERATE and/or POOR condition of the identified ACMs (noted in Section 5.1 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a MODERATE risk of exposure to persons upon approach: Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the East Area Storage Room; Drywall Joint Compound in the ceiling of the East Filler Room; and, Drywall Joint Compound in the walls of the Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room. Based on the GOOD condition of the remaining ACMs (noted in Section 5.1 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a LOW risk of exposure to persons entering the Subject Areas. Lead-Based Coatings (LBCs) Based on the POOR condition of the following LBCs (further noted in Section 5.2 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a LOW-MODERATE risk of exposure to persons upon approach: Orange, Green and Cream Paints on the metal beam in the Kitchen; and, White Paint on the walls of the East Filler Room. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 13 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Based on the GOOD condition of the remaining LBCs (noted in Section 5.2 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a LOW risk of exposure to persons entering the Subject Areas. Elemental Mercury Based on the GOOD condition of the mercury-containing equipment (noted in Section 5.4 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a LOW risk of exposure to persons entering the Subject Areas. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Based on the GOOD condition of the suspect PCB-containing equipment (noted in Section 5.5 of this report), DST concludes that these materials present a LOW risk of exposure to persons entering the Subject Areas. Other Hazardous Materials DST concludes that the rodent droppings and used needles present a MODERATE risk of exposure to persons entering the Subject Areas. 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Prior to renovation/demolition work, remove ACMs from the Subject Areas following work procedures that meet the requirements of WorkSafeBC, specifically, but not limited to include those requirements prescribed through Parts 5.48-5.59 Controlling Exposure, and Parts 6.1 6.32 Asbestos of the BC OH&S Regulation. If additional suspect ACMs are discovered through the course of renovation/demolition work, stop the work and treat the suspect ACM as an ACM until it can be sampled and analyzed for asbestoscontent. Furthermore, DST recommends reference to WorkSafeBC publication, Safe Handling of Asbestos, A Manual of Standard Practices. This document provides a guide to current practices that are to be followed in the Province of British Columbia, providing basic information on asbestos and asbestos products, health hazards and requirements for worker protection, safe work procedures and principles that should be followed in selecting the most suitable technique for the safe abatement of ACMs. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 14 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Lead-Based Coatings (LBCs) LBCs that will be disturbed through renovation/demolition work must be controlled using safe work procedures developed in accordance with the requirements of WorkSafeBC, specifically, but not limited to include those requirements prescribed through Parts 5.48-5.59 Controlling Exposure, and Parts 6.59-6.69 Lead of the BC OH&S Regulation. Furthermore, DST recommends reference to WorkSafeBC publication, Lead Preventing Exposure at Work. This document provides a guide to current practices that are to be followed in the Province of British Columbia, providing basic information on lead and lead products, health hazards and requirements for worker protection, safe work procedures and principles that should be followed in selecting the most suitable technique for the safe abatement of lead. DST also recommends that Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing should be performed on LBCs to facilitate the proper disposal of lead-containing waste. Lead-containing wastes should be disposed of in accordance with the British Columbia Ministry of Environment and should be transported in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act. Mercury-Containing Equipment If taken out of service, mercury-containing wastes should be managed in accordance with the requirements of the British Columbia Ministry of Environment and should be transported in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act. Polychlorinated Biphenyl s (PCBs) When taken out of service, the PCB-content of each fluorescent lamp ballast should be verified through comparison to the criteria outlined in the Environment Canada Report EPS 2/CC/2 (revised) August 1991, Identification of Lamp Ballasts Containing PCBs to assess their likelihood of PCB content. If identified to contain PCBs, the PCB-containing light ballasts should be removed in accordance with the requirements of WorkSafeBC. PCB-containing wastes should be managed in accordance with the requirements of the British Columbia Ministry of Environment and should be transported in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act. For fixtures that are operational and are to be sold for reuse, documentation is required confirming that the purchasers understand the ballasts are PCB-containing, and the purchaser assumes all liability and responsibility associated with the fixtures. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 15 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 Other Hazardous Materials A substance-specific exposure control program (ECP) should be developed and implemented to control the risk of worker exposure to the rodent-related contamination and used needles throughout the renovation work planned for the Subject Area. 8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS This report is intended for client use only. Any use of this document by a third party, or any reliance on or decisions made based on the findings described in this report, are the sole responsibility of such third parties, and DST Consulting Engineers Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions conducted based on this report. No other warranties are implied or expressed. The data, conclusions and recommendations which are presented in this report, and the quality thereof, are based on a scope of work authorized by the client. The sampling program included asbestos bulk sampling and paint chip sampling in select representative areas for laboratory analysis. Note, however, that no scope of work, no matter how exhaustive, can guarantee to identify all contaminants. This report therefore cannot warranty that all building conditions are represented by those identified at specific locations. Recommendations, when included, are made in good faith and are based on several successful experiences. Note also that standards, guidelines and practices related to environmental investigations may change with time. Those which were applied at the time of this investigation may be obsolete or unacceptable at a later date. Any comments given in this report on potential remediation problems and possible methods are intended only for the guidance of the designer. The scope of work may not be sufficient to determine all of the factors that may affect construction, clean-up methods and/or costs. Contractors bidding on this project or undertaking clean-ups should, therefore, make their own interpretation of the factual information presented and draw their own conclusions as to how the conditions may affect their work. Any results from an analytical laboratory or other subcontractor reported herein have been carried out by others, and DST Consulting Engineers Inc. cannot warranty their accuracy. Similarly, DST cannot warranty the accuracy of information supplied by the client. DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Building Material Assessment October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 16 DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 9.0 CLOSURE We trust that the information contained herein meets your needs. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. DST Consulting Engineers Inc. Report prepared by: Report reviewed by: Philip Pow, B.Sc. Technician Christian J. Injates, CEC, CEM Associate, Regional Manager DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Supplemental Pre-Demolition Hazardous Building Material Survey October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC APPENDIX I DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 APPENDIX I CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. 7-2883 East Kent Avenue N., Vancouver, BC, V5S 3T9 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS REPORT AASL Report #: B01933 Project Location: 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Analyst: Gabrielle Sutton Reference #s: GV-VC-030948 Report Date: 7OCT2017 Number of Samples: 41 Method: NIOSH Method 9002 # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 1. 1 AS-ODW1 Layer 1 - brown glue / pattern / silver metal foil / beige / weave Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 40-60 % Cellulose Fibres > 45 % Non-Fibrous 1. 2 AS-ODW1 Layer 2 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 1. 3 AS-ODW1 Layer 3 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 2. 1 AS-ODW2 Layer 1 - thin pale grey / beige (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Ceiling, Kitchen 2. 2 AS-ODW2 Layer 2 - white Drywall Joint Compound, South Ceiling, Kitchen 2. 3 AS-ODW2 Layer 3 - thin beige (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Ceiling, Kitchen 2. 4 AS-ODW2 Layer 4 - pale beige Drywall Joint Compound, South Ceiling, Kitchen 3. 1 AS-ODW3 Layer 1 - thin light grey / orange (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 3. 2 AS-ODW3 Layer 2 - white Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 3. 3 AS-ODW3 Layer 3 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 4. 1 AS-ODW4 Layer 1 - thin pale grey / light grey / orange / yellow / dark teal / peach (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Lounge 4. 2 AS-ODW4 Layer 2 - light beige, pliable / weave / beige glue Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Lounge 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 4. 3 AS-ODW4 Layer 3 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Lounge 4. 4 AS-ODW4 Layer 4 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Lounge 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 1 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 5. 1 AS-ODW6 Layer 1 - thin white / cream (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Women's Washroom 5. 2 AS-ODW6 Layer 2 - red, pliable / weave Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Women's Washroom 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 5. 3 AS-ODW6 Layer 3 - thin light blue (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Women's Washroom 5. 4 AS-ODW6 Layer 4 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Women's Washroom 6. 1 AS-ODW7 Layer 1 - thin beige (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Storage Room 6. 2 AS-ODW7 Layer 2 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Storage Room 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 7. 1 AS-ODW8 Layer 1 - thin teal (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, Ceiling, East Filler Room 7. 2 AS-ODW8 Layer 2 - off-white, thin Drywall Joint Compound, Ceiling, East Filler Room 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 7. 3 AS-ODW8 Layer 3 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, Ceiling, East Filler Room 8. 1 AS-T1 Layer 1 - thin creamy-white / beige / light grey (paint) Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 8. 2 * AS-T1 Layer 2 - light beige, hard Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 8. 3 * AS-T1 Layer 3 - grey cementitious Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 9. 1 AS-T2 Layer 1 - thin creamy-white / beige / light grey (paint) Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 9. 2 * AS-T2 Layer 2 - white, hard Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 9. 3 * AS-T2 Layer 3 - grey cementitious Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 10. 1 AS-T3 Layer 1 - thin creamy-white / beige / light grey (paint) Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 10. 2 * AS-T3 Layer 2 - white & pale beige, hard Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 10. 3 * AS-T3 Layer 3 - grey cementitious Texture and Stucco, Ceiling, East Area Storage Room 0.5-1 % Cellulose Fibres > 99 % Non-Fibrous AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 2 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 11. 1 AS-PI1 Layer 1 - thin orange-beige (paint) Elbow Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 11. 2 AS-PI1 Layer 2 - beige & light grey Elbow Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 40-60 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 40 % Non-Fibrous T 12. 1 AS-PI2 Layer 1 - thin orange-beige (paint) Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 12. 2 ** AS-PI2 Layer 2 - weave, 2 layers Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 5 % Non-Fibrous 12. 3 ** AS-PI2 Layer 3 - beige Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 5 % Non-Fibrous 12. 4 ** AS-PI2 Layer 4 - metal foil / black tar, thin / beige, 2 layers Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 12. 5 AS-PI2 Layer 5 - yellow & orange Insulation, 1/2" Pipe, Kitchen Fridge Mechanical Room 90-100 % Fibrous Glass > 5 % Non-Fibrous 13. 1 ** AS-PI3 Layer 1 - beige Paper Fibreglass Pipe Insulation, Ceiling, Kitchen 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 5 % Non-Fibrous 13. 2 ** AS-PI3 Layer 2 - metal foil / black tar, thin / beige Paper Fibreglass Pipe Insulation, Ceiling, Kitchen 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 13. 3 AS-PI3 Layer 3 - yellow & orange Paper Fibreglass Pipe Insulation, Ceiling, Kitchen 90-100 % Fibrous Glass > 5 % Non-Fibrous 14. 1 ** AS-PI4 Layer 1 - beige Insulation, 1/4" Pipe, Ceiling, Kitchen 70-90 % Cellulose Fibres > 10 % Non-Fibrous 14. 2 ** AS-PI4 Layer 2 - black tar Insulation, 1/4" Pipe, Ceiling, Kitchen 14. 3 AS-PI4 Layer 3 - beige, loose Insulation, 1/4" Pipe, Ceiling, Kitchen 40-60 % Fibrous Glass > 40 % Non-Fibrous 15 ** AS-PI5 Single Phase - light brown, thin Paper-Back Insulation, Ceiling, Program & Services Room 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 5 % Non-Fibrous 16 ** AS-CT1 Single Phase - light grey 1.5'x1.5' Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Resident's Café 60-80 % Fibrous Glass > 20 % Non-Fibrous 17 ** AS-CT2 Single Phase - light orange-beige 4'x1' Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Resident's Café 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 5 % Non-Fibrous AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 3 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 18 ** AS-CT3 Single Phase - light grey 1/2" Thick Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Kitchen 60-80 % Fibrous Glass > 20 % Non-Fibrous 19 ** AS-CT4 Single Phase - light grey Thin Top Layer Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Kitchen 60-80 % Fibrous Glass > 20 % Non-Fibrous 20 ** AS-CT5 Single Phase - light grey Thin 2nd Layer Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Kitchen 60-80 % Fibrous Glass > 20 % Non-Fibrous 21 ** AS-CT6 Single Phase - light beige 2'x2' Acoustic Tile, Ceiling, Resident's Café 30-50 % Fibrous Glass 10-30 % Cellulose Fibres > 25 % Non-Fibrous 22. 1 AS-P1 Layer 1 - thin off-white / orange / yellow / dark teal / light peach (paint) Skimcoat, West Wall, Resident's Café 22. 2 AS-P1 Layer 2 - dark grey, pliable / weave / beige glue Skimcoat, West Wall, Resident's Café 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 22. 3 AS-P1 Layer 3 - orange-beige / light beige glue Skimcoat, West Wall, Resident's Café 70-90 % Cellulose Fibres > 15 % Non-Fibrous 22. 4 AS-P1 Layer 4 - white Skimcoat, West Wall, Resident's Café 23. 1 AS-P2 Layer 1 - thin off-white / dark orange / white (paint) Skimcoat, East Wall, Resident's Café 23. 2 AS-P2 Layer 2 - creamy-white Skimcoat, East Wall, Resident's Café 24. 1 AS-P3 Layer 1 - thin off-white (paint) Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway 24. 2 AS-P3 Layer 2 - beige, pliable / weave / beige glue Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway 20-40 % Cellulose Fibres > 60 % Non-Fibrous 24. 3 AS-P3 Layer 3 - beige / light beige glue Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway 70-90 % Cellulose Fibres > 15 % Non-Fibrous 24. 4 AS-P3 Layer 4 - brown glue / green / silver metal foil / beige / weave Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway 40-60 % Cellulose Fibres > 45 % Non-Fibrous 24. 5 AS-P3 Layer 5 - thin blue (paint) Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway 24. 6 AS-P3 Layer 6 - white, hard Skimcoat, South Wall, South Hallway AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 4 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 25. 1 AS-DW1 Layer 1 - thin white (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Kitchen 25. 2 AS-DW1 Layer 2 - creamy-white Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Kitchen 25. 3 AS-DW1 Layer 3 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Kitchen 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 26. 1 AS-DW2 Layer 1 - thin white (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 26. 2 AS-DW2 Layer 2 - creamy-white Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 26. 3 AS-DW2 Layer 3 - thin off-white / orange / yellow / dark teal / light peach (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 26. 3 AS-DW2 Layer 4 - beige Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Resident's Café 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 27 AS-DW3 Single Phase - cream Drywall Joint Compound, Ceiling, Laundry Room 1-5 % Fibrous Glass > 95 % Non-Fibrous 28. 1 AS-DW4 Layer 1 - thin creamy-white (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Services & Program Space 28. 2 AS-DW4 Layer 2 - white Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Services & Program Space 28. 3 AS-DW4 Layer 3 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, North Wall, Services & Program Space 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 29. 1 AS-DW5 Layer 1 - thin off-white (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Lounge 29. 2 AS-DW5 Layer 2 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Lounge 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 29. 3 AS-DW5 Layer 3 - beige Drywall Joint Compound, East Wall, Lounge 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 30. 1 AS-DW6 Layer 1 - thin creamy-white / pink / pale pink / light grey / yellow / pink / orange (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Washroom 30. 2 AS-DW6 Layer 2 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Washroom 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 30. 3 AS-DW6 Layer 3 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Washroom 30. 4 AS-DW6 Layer 4 - cream Drywall Joint Compound, West Wall, East Area Washroom 90-100 % Cellulose Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 5 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 31. 1 AS-DW7 Layer 1 - thin off-white / yellow-orange (paint) Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Lounge Room 31. 2 AS-DW7 Layer 2 - white Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Lounge Room 31. 3 AS-DW7 Layer 3 - off-white Drywall Joint Compound, South Wall, Lounge Room 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 32. 1 AS-Mas1 Layer 1 - thin white (paint) Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 32. 2 ** AS-Mas1 Layer 2 - grey mastic Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 1-10 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 90 % Non-Fibrous T 33. 1 AS-Mas2 Layer 1 - thin white (paint) Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 33. 2 ** AS-Mas2 Layer 2 - grey mastic Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 1-10 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 90 % Non-Fibrous T 34. 1 AS-Mas3 Layer 1 - thin white (paint) Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 34. 2 ** AS-Mas3 Layer 2 - cream mastic Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 34. 3 ** AS-Mas3 Layer 3 - grey mastic, hard Grey Mastic, Windows, Resident's Café 1-10 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 90 % Non-Fibrous T 35 AS-G1 Single Phase - off-white Beige Ceramic Tile Grout, West Wall, Men's Washroom 36. 1 * AS-G2 Layer 1 - thin white / red, hard Blue Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, Resident's Café 36. 2 * AS-G2 Layer 2 - cream cementitious Blue Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, Resident's Café 36. 3 * AS-G2 Layer 3 - dark grey cementitious Blue Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, Resident's Café 37 * AS-G3 Single Phase - cream, hard Green-Grey Ceramic Tile Grout, East Wall, Women's Washroom 38. 1 * AS-G4 Layer 1 - dark grey, hard Red Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, Kitchen 38. 2 AS-G4 Layer 2 - off-white Red Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, Kitchen 1-5 % Chrysotile Asbestos > 95 % Non-Fibrous T 39. 1 * AS-G5 Layer 1 - light grey, hard Orange Ceramic Tile Grout, West Wall, Exterior 39. 2 AS-G5 Layer 2 - weave Orange Ceramic Tile Grout, West Wall, Exterior 90-100 % Synthetic Fibres > 1 % Non-Fibrous 40 * AS-G6 Single Phase - dark grey cementitious Grey Ceramic Tile Grout, South Entrance Wall, Exterior AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 6 of 7

Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. # B01933 Sample Sub-Sample Sample Description / Location Results ASB 41 * AS-G7 Single Phase - cream cementitious Blue Ceramic Tile Grout, Floor, East Area Storage Comments Samples analyzed in accordance with NIOSH Laboratory Method 9002 American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) BAPAT Program Laboratory Number 204301 Estimated Limit of Detection is <0.5 % ASB = Asbestos present/absent in material T = Asbestos Present AASL Asbestos Analytical Services Ltd. will not accept any responsibility as to the manner of interpretation or application of these results. * Sample preparation included grinding process. ** Sample preparation included ashing process. Analyst: Original Signed By Gabrielle Sutton, B.A. Date: October 7, 2017 Original Signed By Reviewed By: Gabrielle Sutton, B.A. AASL #B01933. 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC Page 7 of 7

Attention:Philip Pow DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Unit B - 4125 McConnell Drive Burnaby, BC CANADA V5A 3J7 Your Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Your C.O.C. #: 08445430, 08445431, 08445429 Report Date: 2017/10/06 Report #: R2456173 Version: 1 - Final MAXXAM JOB #: B786182 Received: 2017/10/03, 10:20 Sample Matrix: PAINT # Samples Received: 18 Analyses Elements by ICP-AES (acid extr. solid) Elements by ICP-AES (acid extr. solid) CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Date Quantity Extracted 10 8 Date Analyzed Laboratory Method 2017/10/05 2017/10/06 BBY7SOP-00018 2017/10/06 2017/10/06 BBY7SOP-00018 Analytical Method EPA 6010c R3 m EPA 6010c R3 m Sample Matrix: Solid # Samples Received: 11 Analyses Elements by ICP-AES (acid extr. solid) Elements by ICP-AES (acid extr. solid) Date Quantity Extracted 9 2 Date Analyzed Laboratory Method 2017/10/05 2017/10/06 BBY7SOP-00018 2017/10/06 2017/10/06 BBY7SOP-00018 Analytical Method EPA 6010c R3 m EPA 6010c R3 m Remarks: Maxxam Analytics laboratories are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for specific parameters on scopes of accreditation. Unless otherwise noted, procedures used by Maxxam are based upon recognized Provincial, Federal or US method compendia such as CCME, MDDELCC, EPA, APHA. All work recorded herein has been done in accordance with procedures and practices ordinarily exercised by professionals in Maxxam s profession using accepted testing methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures (except where otherwise agreed by the client and Maxxam in writing). All data is in statistical control and has met quality control and method performance criteria unless otherwise noted. All method blanks are reported: unless indicated otherwise, associated sample data are not blank corrected. Maxxam Analytics liability is limited to the actual cost of the requested analyses, unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Maxxam has been retained to provide analysis of samples provided by the Client using the testing methodology referenced in this report. Interpretation and use of test results are the sole responsibility of the Client and are not within the scope of services provided by Maxxam, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Solid sample results, except biota, are based on dry weight unless otherwise indicated. Organic analyses are not recovery corrected except for isotope dilution methods. Results relate to samples tested. This Certificate shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Reference Method suffix m indicates test methods incorporate validated modifications from specific reference methods to improve performance. * RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference. Page 1 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOLID) DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number UNITS SC7237 08445430 LB-1 EXT. S. ENTRANCE WALL GREY CERAMIC TILE SC7238 08445430 LB-2 EXT. W. WALL ORANGE CERAMIC TILE SC7239 08445430 LB-3 WOMENS WASHRM-W.WALL GREEN GREY CERAMIC TILE SC7240 08445430 LB-4 EAST AREA STORAGE RM FLOOR BLUE CERAMIC TILE RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 18.7 9.9 287 <3.0 3.0 8782478 Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number UNITS SC7242 08445430 LB-6 MEN WASHRM W.WALL CREAM CERAMIC TILE SC7243 08445430 LB-7 RESIDENT'S CAFE FLOOR GREY CERAMIC TILE SC7244 08445430 LB-8 JANITOR RM - W.WALL LIGHT GREY CERAMIC TILE SC7245 08445430 LB-9 WOMEN'S WASHRM FLOOR MULTI-COLOR CERAMIC TILE RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit <3.0 15.2 162 <3.0 3.0 8782478 Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number UNITS SC7246 08445430 LB-10 JANITOR RM - N.WALL LIGHTER GREY CERAMIC TILE QC Batch SC7288 08445429 LB-26 M WASHRM W WALL GREY CERAMIC TILE SC7291 08445429 LB-29 KITCHEN FLOOR RED CERAMIC TILE RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 87.3 8782478 3.1 3.2 3.0 8783843 Page 3 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 LEAD IN PAINT CHIPS (PAINT) DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number SC7241 08445430 SC7247 08445430 SC7248 08445430 SC7261 08445431 UNITS LB-5 EAST AREA - WEST WALL CREAM + BRW PAINT LB-11 EXT.WALLS THROUGHOUT BLUE GREY PAINT LB-12 EXT.TEXTURED CEILINGS OFF-WHITE PAINT LB-13 EXT. W.WALL BY DOOR GREEN PAINT RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 3260 7000 26.8 5.9 3.0 8782478 Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number UNITS SC7262 08445431 LB-14 EXT. CEILING BY S. ENTRANCE GLOSSY GREY PAINT SC7263 08445431 LB-15 RESIDENT CAFE E WALL WHT,ORANGE,GREEN PAINT SC7264 08445431 LB-16 KITCHEN FRIDGE MECHANICAL RM S.WALL WHITE PAINT SC7265 08445431 LB-17 KITCHEN METAL BEAM ORANGE,GREEN,CREA M PAINT RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 224 <3.0 80.3 722 3.0 8782478 Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number SC7267 08445431 SC7268 08445431 SC7269 08445431 UNITS LB-19 KITCHEN E. STORAGE GREEN PAINT LB-20 KITCHEN S. CEILING CREAM PAINT QC Batch LB-21 KITCHEN DOOR BLK PAINT RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 1050 1520 8782478 288 3.0 8783843 Page 4 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 LEAD IN PAINT CHIPS (PAINT) DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number SC7270 08445431 SC7271 08445431 SC7272 08445431 UNITS LB-22 SERVICES + PYRM W.WALL BRIGHT BLUE PAINT RDL LB-23 SERVICES + PYRM W.WALL GREY PAINT RDL LB-24 RESIDENT CAFE FLOOR BLUE GREY PAINT RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg 14 (1) RDL = Reportable Detection Limit (1) Detection limits raised due to insufficient sample volume. 12 <6.0 (1) 6.0 19.2 3.0 8783843 Maxxam ID Sampling Date COC Number SC7287 08445429 SC7289 08445429 SC7290 08445429 SC7292 08445429 UNITS LB-25 SOUTH HALLWAY S WALL RDL LB-27 EAST FILLER RM PIPE GREEN PAINT RDL LB-28 EAST FILLER RM E WALL WHITE PAINT LB-5 RDL QC Batch Total Metals by ICP Total Lead (Pb) mg/kg 42.8 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit (1) Detection limits raised due to insufficient sample volume. 3.0 20700 (1) 12 177 472 3.0 8783843 Page 5 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP GENERAL COMMENTS Unable to proceed with lead in paint analysis on sample LB-18 Kitchen Metal Beam Red Paint due to insufficient volume. Results relate only to the items tested. Page 6 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 Site Location: HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP Method Blank RPD QC Batch Parameter Date Value UNITS Value (%) QC Limits 8782478 Total Lead (Pb) 2017/10/06 <3.0 mg/kg 15 35 8783843 Total Lead (Pb) 2017/10/06 <3.0 mg/kg 0.22 35 Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement. QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of method accuracy. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination. QC Standard % Recovery QC Limits 98 80-120 89 80-120 Page 7 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Maxxam Job #: B786182 Report Date: 2017/10/06 DST CONSULTING ENGINEERS Client Project #: GV-VC-030948 Site Location: PRE-RENOVATION HAZMAT ASSESSMENT, 1060 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER BC Sampler Initials: PP VALIDATION SIGNATURE PAGE The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). Rob Reinert, B.Sc., Scientific Specialist Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page. Page 8 of 11 Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics Burnaby: 4606 Canada Way V5G 1K5 Telephone(604) 734-7276 Fax(604) 731-2386

Page 9 of 11

Page 10 of 11

Page 11 of 11

Supplemental Pre-Demolition Hazardous Building Material Survey October 11, 2017 1060 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC APPENDIX I DST File No.: GV-VC-030948 APPENDIX II FLOOR PLANS DST Consulting Engineers Ltd.