PARENT REPORT. Tables and Graphs Report for WNV and WIAT-II. Copyright 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved.

Similar documents
Scoring Assistant SAMPLE REPORT

Ante s parents have requested a cognitive and emotional assessment so that Ante can work towards fulfilling his true potential.

Score Report. Client Information

WPPSI -IV A&NZ Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition: Australian & New Zealand Score Report

Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement Normative Update. The Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement was originally published in 1985.

WPPSI -IV A&NZ Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition: Australian & New Zealand Score Report

FOR TRAINING ONLY! WISC -V Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Fifth Edition Score Report

The Standardized Reading Inventory Second Edition (Newcomer, 1999) is an

Scoring & Reporting Software

RATIONALE for IQ TEST

Analyzing Language & Literacy using the WMLS-R

KeyMath Revised: A Diagnostic Inventory of Essential Mathematics (Connolly, 1998) is

PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT

Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II (MAB-II) Clinical Report

Understanding and Interpreting Pharmacy College Admission Test Scores

STAAR-Like Quality Starts with Reliability

Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Revised (WRM)Academic and Reading Skills

Stanford 10 (Stanford Achievement Test Series, Tenth Edition)

Chapter Standardization and Derivation of Scores

The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (Mullen, 1992) is an individually administered,

PCAT FAQs What are the important PCAT test dates for ? Registration Opens 3/1/2017. o July o September

Illinois Licensure Testing System (ILTS)

The 1995 Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (Karlsen & Gardner, 1996) is the fourth

Standardised Scores Have A Mean Of Answer And Standard Deviation Of Answer

RIAS-2 Score Report. by Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, and Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD

Activity 16: Discovering Your Abilities

Joe Sample. Total Administration Time: C6wPgCYJK. Candidate ID: Sample Distributor. Organization:

RIST-2 Score Report. by Cecil R. Reynolds, PhD, and Randy W. Kamphaus, PhD

Webtable 1 Preliminary Classical Item Statistics for the ZAT. English

Introducing the Fifth Edition of the

Introducing WISC-V Spanish Anise Flowers, Ph.D.

Test and Measurement Chapter 10: The Wechsler Intelligence Scales: WAIS-IV, WISC-IV and WPPSI-III

What Pearson Tests Do I Need to Take?

NDIT TM Numerical Data Interpretation Test. FAQs

20. Alternative Ranking Using Criterium Decision Plus (Multi-attribute Utility Analysis)

Identify sampling methods and recognize biased samples

Statistics: General principles

Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II (MAB-II) Extended Report

The Multivariate Regression Model

Equivalence of Q-interactive and Paper Administrations of Cognitive Tasks: Selected NEPSY II and CMS Subtests

Ability. Verify Ability Test Report. Name Ms Candidate. Date.

ALTE Quality Assurance Checklists. Unit 1. Test Construction

Chapter 4 Familiarizing Yourself With Q-interactive Assess

Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test -II (BMCT -II) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Glossary of Standardized Testing Terms

Carlo Fabrizio D'Amico

Test Results Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Action Item November 18, SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment to Rule 6A , Florida Teacher Certification Examinations.

Minnesota Teacher Licensure Examinations. Technical Report

Coming December 2013

Cset Spanish Subtest 1 Examples

ESTIMATING TOTAL-TEST SCORES FROM PARTIAL SCORES IN A MATRIX SAMPLING DESIGN JANE SACHAR. The Rand Corporatlon

CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE TEST BATTERY

Table 1 Table 2. Results Table 3

Chapter 6 Reliability, Validity & Norms

FACES IV Package. Administration Manual. David H. Olson Ph.D. Dean M. Gorall Ph.D. Judy W. Tiesel Ph.D.

Certification Areas Grade Levels Test Titles Fees Early Childhood Education & Elementary Education

Elementary Education Subtest II (103)

Equating and Scaling for Examination Programs

Quantitative Methods. Presenting Data in Tables and Charts. Basic Business Statistics, 10e 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 2-1

Report of RADTECH Student Performance on the PSB-Health Occupations Aptitude Examination-Revised

Using Your ACT Results

ALTE Quality Assurance Checklists. Unit 4. Test analysis and Post-examination Review

Despite the plethora of IQ tests available for psychologists to use

Grades in a Diploma Plus School

Career Guidance Tools for Practical Applications I

Measurement and Scaling Concepts

What is Q-interactive? A platform delivering current Pearson tests in a digital format

2. What is the problem with using the sum of squares as a measure of variability, that is, why is variance a better measure?

Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP. TNReady Grade 5 Math Part II PRACTICE TEST. Student Name. Teacher Name

Clerical Skills Test. Administrator s Manual C.S.T. Developed by J. M. Llobet, Ph.D ComplyRight, Inc.

Grade-level and Competency Portfolios

O VERVIEW. This evaluation tool will help answer the questions:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mastery Test Summary Form

Minnesota Teacher Licensure Exams (MTLE) Presentation by Maureen Prenn February, 2011

An introduction to: Q-interactive. October 2014 Jeremy Clarke Technology Consultant

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Report 2015

Nestlé Foods Shipping Pallet Inventory

UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) Consortium UKCAT Examination. Executive Summary Testing Interval: 1 July October 2016

Minnesota Teacher Licensure Exams (MTLE) Presentation by Maureen Prenn September 12, 2011

Why Learn Statistics?

It is not essential for students to conduct an investigation for every question they generate or generate questions based on prior investigations.

Development and Standardization of SCAN-A : Test of Auditory Processing Disorders in

HOGAN PERSONALITY INVENTORY

Understanding Fluctuations in Market Share Using ARIMA Time-Series Analysis

Assaying and Analysis Choices in Practice

Lexile Scores To Gates Macginitie

t L I-i RB Margaret K. Schultz Princeton, New Jersey May 25, 1954 William H. Angof'f THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW SCALES FOR THE APTITUDE AND ADVANCED

User Guide. Reporting tool for Managers. Grupo Santander. Engagement Survey 2016

Montana Public Health and Human Services Public Health And Safety Division. Workforce Assessment. Final Report 2013

Virginia Communication and Literacy Assessment (VCLA)

Organizational Culture Diagnostic Instrument (OCDI)

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the TerraNova-Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills/5. Joseph Stevens. University of New Mexico.

The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: Zugzwang for the Practicing Professional?

Text Comparison Lexile To Mclass Dibels

Intercultural Development Inventory v.3 (IDI) EDUCATION GROUP PROFILE REPORT. Prepared for: Prepared by: CAN Cultural Competency Training

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program TCAP. TNReady Grade 6 Math Part I PRACTICE TEST. Student Name. Teacher Name

Transcription:

PARENT REPORT Tables and Graphs Report for WNV and WIAT-II

EXAMINEE: WNV Age REPORT DATE: 10/5/2006 AGE: 6 years GRADE: Not Specified DATE OF BIRTH: 10/5/2000 ETHNICITY: Not Specified EXAMINEE ID: Not Specified EXAMINER: Tester Examiner GENDER: Not Specified Tests Administered: WNV (10/5/2006) WIAT-II (10/5/2006) Age at Testing: (6 years 0 months) (6 years 0 months) Is this a retest? Comments: No Full Scale Score Summary Scale Sum of T-Scores Full Scale Score Percentile Rank 95%Conf. Interval Qualitative Description Full Scale Score 296 146 99.9 134-150 Very Superior

Vertical bar represents the Standard Error of Measurement. Score SEM Full Scale Score 146 4.24

Subtest Scores Summary Subtests Raw Score T-Score Test Age Equiv. Percentile Rank Matrices 30 89 >21:00 >99.9 Coding 40 68 >7:10 96 Object Assembly 40 66 >7:10 95 Recognition 18 73 >7:10 99

Vertical bar represents the Standard Error of Measurement. Subtest Score SEM Subtest Score SEM Matrices (MA) 89 3.46 Object Assembly (OA) 66 4.36 Coding (CD) 68 4 Recognition (RG) 73 4.47

Difference Between Subtest and Mean of Subtest Scores Subtest Subtest T-Score Mean T-Score Diff. Critical Value S/W Base Rate Matrices 89 74 15.00 8 S 1.0 Coding 68 74-6.00 9 21.1 Object Assembly 66 74-8.00 10 13.4 Recognition 73 74-1.00 10 47.6 Overall Mean = 74, Scatter = 23, Base Rate = 18.2% Statistical Significance (Critical Values) at the.05 level WNV Total Raw Scores Subtest Matrices Total Raw Score (0 to 41) Coding Total Raw Score (0 to 72) Object Assembly Total Raw Score (0 to 56) Recognition Total Raw Score (0 to 21) Total Raw Score 30 40 40 18 Summary of WIAT-II Subtest Scores SUBTESTS* RAW STD 95% INTERVAL PR NCE S9 AGE EQU GRADE EQU Word Reading 5 69 66-72 2 6 1 4:0 PreK5:1 Reading Comprehension 0** 64 59-69 1 <1 1 <6:0 <1:0 Numerical Operations 5 84 73-95 14 28 3 5:0 K:0 Math Reasoning 5 70 62-78 2 8 1 4:0 PreK5:1 Spelling 5 88 81-95 21 33 3 5:4 K:3 Listening Comprehension 15 100 88-112 50 50 5 6:0 K:9 Oral Expression 17 90 80-100 25 36 4 4:8 PreK5:2 * WIAT-II age-based normative information was used in the calculation of subtest and composite scores. ** Represents Reading Comprehension weighted raw score.

Summary of WIAT-II Composite and Total Scores 95% COMPOSITES* RAW STD INTERVAL PR NCE S9 Mathematics 154 75 67-83 5 15 2 Oral Language 190 92 83-101 30 39 4 * WIAT-II age-based normative information was used in the calculation of subtest and composite scores Differences Between Composite Standard Scores COMPOSITES DIFFERENCE SIGNIF. FREQUENCY Mathematics/Oral Language -17.05* 11.1% * significant at the.05 level

Subtest SS SEM Subtest SS SEM Word Reading (WR) 69 1 Spelling (SP) 88 3 Reading Comprehension (RC) 64 2 Written Expression (WE) Pseudoword Decoding (PD) Listening Comprehension (LC) 100 6 Numerical Operations (NO) 84 5 Oral Expression (OE) 90 4 Math Reasoning (MR) 70 3

Ability-Achievement Discrepancy Analysis Date of Ability Testing: 10/5/2006 Ability Score Type: Full Scale Ability Score: 146 Predicted-Difference Method Predicted Score Actual Score Expected Diff. Critical Value WIAT-II SUBTEST Word Reading 123 69 54 7.94 Y <1% Reading Comprehension 122 64 58 8.73 Y <1% Numerical Operations 127 84 43 15.34 Y <1% Math Reasoning 129 70 59 13.19 Y <1% Spelling 119 88 31 10.9 Y 1-2% Listening Comprehension 123 100 23 18.03 Y 4% Oral Expression 112 90 22 14 Y 5-10% COMPOSITES Mathematics 131 75 56 12.45 Y <1% Oral Language 121 92 29 13.18 Y 1-2% Statistical Significance (Critical Values) at the.01 level Sig. Diff. Y/N Base Rate