ACL ESSENTIALS. Get insight into your ERP process health, compliance & financial exposure ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

Similar documents
ACL ESSENTIALS. Get insight into your ERP process health, compliance & financial exposure SEGEREGATION OF DUTIES

ACL ESSENTIALS. Get insight into your ERP process health, compliance & financial exposure HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

Item. Item / Warehouse. Item / Warehouse / Location. Item / Warehouse / Location / Lot. Item / Warehouse / Location / Lot / Container

Leveraging Data Analytics to Expand Audit Coverage and Add Organizational Value

2. Which of the following statements is true when configuring a group chart of accounts?

The Best of Crimes, the Worst of Crimes: Fraud Stories That Prove the Truth Is in the Transactions

Sanjay Srinivas PH:

You can easily view comparative data and drill through for transaction details.

Reason codes allow you to capture different types of information using the same transaction. The codes are linked to the transaction code.

Using Transactional Analysis for

Leverage T echnology: Turn Risk into Opportunity

Managing Risk in Your P2P Process: 10 Ways that Automation Can Help Mitigate Risk

Seattle Public Schools The Office of Internal Audit

Accounts Payable Release 2015

Accenture Profit Recovery and Analytics

Oracle ERP Cloud Period Close Procedures

Finance Month End. Deltek Maconomy Deltek, Inc. Deltek proprietary, all rights reserved.

Sage MAS 90 and 200 Product Update 2 Delivers Added Value!

Duplicate Payments: Causes, Implications, and Solutions

The Complete Guide to Subscription Billing

AUDIT STATUS. Continuous Auditing Ideas and Priority Ranking Draft: 8/7/2012

Audit of the Acquisition and Payment Cycle: Tests of Controls, Substantive Tests of Transactions, and Accounts Payable. Chapter 18

ORACLE ADVANCED FINANCIAL CONTROLS CLOUD SERVICE

ERS Guide for Suppliers

Which of the following are subareas of the People Integration subcomponent of SAP NetWeaver?

Welcome to the topic on purchasing items.

Paper FAU (UK) Foundations in Audit (United Kingdom) FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTANCY. Monday 18 June 2012

Data Exchange Module. Vendor Invoice Import

Financial Statement Close Process

Working with Accounts Payable

Internal Audit Report. Contract Administration: 601CT Contracts TxDOT Internal Audit Division

File. Audit. City Auditor

Data Exchange Module. Vendor Invoice Import

Enter Invoice. Invoice. No Holds. Approve Invoice. Pay Invoice. Reconcile Payments

Foreign Currency in Maconomy

Clarity Accounts Payable Year-end Procedure Guide 2017

Welcome to the topic on Opening Balances.

Vendor Master File Audit

What s new in Sage Evolution Standard Version 6.82

Sage Release Notes. March 2018

Year-End Close Checklists

Classic General Ledger Balancing Flow Charts

Creating Non-PO Based Invoices Table of Contents

Data Management: Applying Data Analytics to a Continuous Controls Monitoring Solution

Solutions. Cash & Logistics Intelligent and Integrated Solutions to Optimize Currency Levels, Reduce Expenses and Improve Control

Sage ERP Accpac Online 5.6

Payment Manager Users Guide - Updated 011/1/2012

The story Unblocking vendor invoices

P-Cards Done Right. Katie Beatty Community Engagement Manager

Financial Transfer Guide DBA Software Inc.

Welcome to the course on the working process across branch companies.

Defect Repair Report as of 9/12/2014

KPI Dictionary ABRIDGED SAMPLE. A KPI Reference Guide for Use in Performance Management. Utilities Operations

FOUNDATIONS IN ACCOUNTANCY Paper FAU (UK) Foundations in Audit (United Kingdom)

Doc P-Card Services Provider RFP

Procurement Management Internal Audit

BillQuick-QuickBooks Advanced Integration Guide 2016

Automating Audit Analytics: The benefits, the concepts and the road to Continuous Auditing

Integrated Accounting, CRM and ERP System for Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, ios, Android and AIX

Ariba Network Enabling Business Commerce in a Digital Economy

Greentree. Financial Management

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 530 AUDIT SAMPLING AND OTHER MEANS OF TESTING CONTENTS

P13-1 ANS. a. Table of Entities and Activities for Internet Payment Platform (Accounts Payable and Cash Disbursements Processes)

Introduction to Enterprise Financial Suite. Joanne Dyer Information Systems Engineering

Keep Procure-to-Pay (P2P) Fraud at Bay with Fraud Detection Tools & Techniques

Activant Prophet 21. Perfecting Your Month and Year End Closing Routines

What does an external auditor look for in SAP R/3 during SOX 404 Audits? Ram Bapu, CISSP, CISM Sandra Keigwin, CISSP

Energy Future Holdings (EFH)

Airbus initiated the Purchase to Pay (P2P) Project to complement the e-ordering with e-invoicing

SANTANDER TREASURY LINK TRANSITION GUIDE

The Role of Analytics in Auditing The Importance of What the Numbers Indicate and Lack to Indicate

What s new in Sage Evolution. Version 7.10

Enhancing Procurement Card Programs For E-Commerce & Mission Success. IntraMalls Assurance Services

Fraud Risk Management

Sage 100 Direct Deposit. Getting Started Guide

FLORIDA. They included 19 recommendations, which Management agreed to implement.

Using Data Analytics as a Management Tool to Identify Organizational Risks

Procurement Card Continuous Auditing

Internal Fraud Monitoring & Investigation Best Practices. By Tom Holland, CFE

Manish Patel. Discover SAP. ERP Financials. Bonn Boston

Month End Closing Procedures

Welcome to the introduction of the Intercompany Integration Solution for SAP Business One. In this course, we present the highlights of the basic

3 rd Annual Professional Development Conference Development District Association of Appalachia John G. Hulsey, CGFM

Finance Module Best Practices Dynamics GP. Speaker Name: McDowell, VanJura, Eichner GPUG

Module 9 Business Process and ADempeire

Month End Closing Procedures

VAT compliance requirements

Deltek Ajera Release Notes

Internal Audit Report

EA-KENYA UNILEVER KENYA LIMITED

Internal Control and the Computerised Information System (CIS) Environment. CA A. Rafeq, FCA

SAP Solution Brief SAP Solutions for Small Businesses and Midsize Companies SAP Business One. by Automating Intercompany Transactions

Join Soft Corp IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES

PeopleSoft Enhancement Project

Foundation Pack (ID: 14,005,200) Designed for Dynamics NAV 2009 Classic or RTC with 49 great features all in one FOB

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

Automatic reconciliation in Xero for Single and Repeating Invoice payments through IntegraPay

SAP FI GL Configuration

SAGE ACCPAC. Sage Accpac ERP. Converting from Simply Accounting by Sage

Week 3: Fraud, Procure to Pay Process Controls

Transcription:

ACL ESSENTIALS Get insight into your ERP process health, compliance & financial exposure ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

Page Analytic Name Duplicate payments AP Analytic 01 Duplicate invoices AP Analytic 02 Duplicate invoices using vendor s numeric invoice values AP Analytic 03 Future dated invoices AP Analytic 04 Recurring sundry expense review AP Analytic 05 Invoices for one-time vendors AP Analytic 06 Vendor payments made over a weekend AP Analytic 07 Invoices captured over a weekend AP Analytic 08 Invoices greater than a threshold AP Analytic 09 Purchase order date after the invoice date AP Analytic 10 Vendor paid by both purchase order and sundry expense AP Analytic 11 Invoices greater than approved purchase orders AP Analytic 12 Three way match automatically released payments AP Analytic 13 Three way match re-performance AP Analytic 14 Version 6.0.0 2018/02

Identifies all potential duplicate payments to the same vendor for the same amount made within a configurable time period ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 3

CONTEXT High volumes of payments from all areas of the business are processed through the Finance function every day or payment cycle. It is vital to closely and continuously monitor these payments to detect potential fraud or errors. RISK A vendor is paid twice, or more often, through administrative errors or fictitious vendor invoices being submitted for payment with details similar to an original valid invoice. This may result in overpayment to vendors or irrecoverable financial losses. PROCEDURE Identifies potential duplicate payments made to the same vendor for the same amount within a configurable time period (e.g. 14 days, 30 days). ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts payments within a user-determined period of days and identifies potential duplicate payments to the same vendor (using system vendor ID) with the same value (using document/original currency), while excluding reversed transactions. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELDS VARIABLES Period (number of days) for payment analysis. Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name 1 Vendor Name 2 Pay User Name Accounting Document Number Clearing Document Number Line Item Account Document Number Pay User ID Item Description Debit / Credit Indicator Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Clearing Date Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Document Type Document Date Day Document Entered OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Duplicate payments grouped by user Comparing date and value ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_01_APCS102 PAGE 4

Identifies potential duplicate invoices after stripping out any special characters in the invoice numbers ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 5

CONTEXT Often the same invoice is captured multiple times despite preventive system validation and controls being in place. Administrative errors or application control circumvention results in additional and/or changed characters to the invoice number, causing duplicate invoice capturing that would otherwise be undetectable. RISK The same vendor invoice is presented twice for payment or fictitious/invalid vendor invoices are paid. This may result in either overpayment or incorrect payment to vendors and often irrecoverable financial losses from fraudulent and/or invalid invoices being paid. PROCEDURE Identifies duplicate paid invoices for the same amount after stripping out any special characters in the invoice numbers. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all paid invoices and removes/strips out special characters (e.g. ~!@#$%) from the invoice number field (which is normally a free text field in the ERP system). Thereafter the script performs a duplicates test using the stripped invoice number and invoice value fields. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Vendor Invoice Number Release User Name Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Document Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Date Report Currency Amount in Reporting Currency Accounting Document Number Release User OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Heatmap comparing users and vendors Showing value over time ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_02_APCS103 PAGE 6

Identifies potential duplicate invoices after converting invoice numbers to numeric values ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 7

CONTEXT Often the same invoice is captured multiple times despite preventive system validation and controls being in place. Administrative errors or application control circumvention results in additional and/or changed characters to the invoice number, causing duplicate invoice capturing that would otherwise be undetectable. RISK The same vendor invoice is presented twice for payment or fictitious/invalid vendor invoices are paid. This may result in either overpayment or incorrect payment to vendors and often irrecoverable financial losses from fraudulent and/or invalid invoices being paid. PROCEDURE Identifies duplicate paid invoices for the same amount after converting the invoice numbers to numeric values. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all paid invoices and converts the invoice number from the invoice number field (which is normally a free text field in the ERP system) to a numeric value (e.g. INV101a to 101 ). Thereafter the script performs a duplicates test using the numeric invoice number and invoice value fields. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name 1 Debit/Credit Indicator Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Document Currency Amount in Document Currency Report Currency Amount in Reporting Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Release User Release User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Heatmap comparing users and vendors Showing value over time ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_03_APCS601 PAGE 8

Extracts all invoices with invoice dates in the future ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 9

CONTEXT Invoices are expected to have a date subsequent to the provision of goods or services. Invoices captured with dates far into the future indicates either administrative errors or premature invoicing of services not yet provided. RISK Non-payment of invoices due to incorrect invoice date capturing resulting in unnecessary interest or penalties, or premature invoicing of services that have not been rendered, or potentially fictitious invoices. PROCEDURE Extracts all invoices with invoice dates in the future. The invoice date is manually inputted and not system-generated. They are susceptible to human error during capturing and incorrect dates, including dates in the future, may be captured. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all invoices that have invoice dates in the future; any date more than 30 days after the date the analytic is run will become an exception. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Document Date Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Debit / Credit Indicator Release User Accounting Document Number Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Analysis of dates per user Count grouped by user ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_04_APCS341 PAGE 10

Identifies all repetitive sundry invoices from the same vendor for the same amount ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 11

CONTEXT Sundry expenses are incurred on a once-off or ad hoc basis, and don t require a purchase order. These expenses require less processing and attract less controls and are not expected to be repetitive and should be analysed further to discover if they need to follow the full procurement processes and attract greater controls. RISK Unauthorised invoices could be paid because less stringent procurement controls exist for sundry expenses. This has the potential to result in unauthorised,invalid, excessive or potentially fraudulent payments. PROCEDURE Identifies all repetitive sundry invoices to the same vendor for the same amount. These vendors should be reviewed to understand why repetitive invoices are paid as sundry expenses, rather than through procurement, when there is an evident continuing business relationship. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts and filters invoices for sundry expenses using a unique invoice identifier (defined in scoping), and performs a duplicate analysis using the vendor ID and value to provide a listing of all multiple sundry expenses. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Document Type Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User Released User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Value over time by vendor ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_05_APCS108 PAGE 12

Extracts all invoices made to one-time vendors ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE13

CONTEXT Vendors are created with an expectation of a multitransaction relationship. Creation of a vendor in the ERP system requires supporting documentation and vetting prior to transacting (controls). One-time vendors do not require such stringent vendor creation procedures. Abuse or overuse of one-time vendors could represent control circumvention and/or fraud. RISK Invoices for one-time vendors could be invalid because the controls are less stringent. This may result in unauthorized payment to vendors or irrecoverable financial losses from fraudulent/invalid invoices being authorized and paid. PROCEDURE Extracts all invoices made to one-time vendors classified as such on the vendor master file. Through interpretations and visualizations, validation of one-time vendor invoices can proceed, raising exceptions for further examination. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all invoices from companies classified as one-time vendors in the ERP vendor master data, in a given period. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Debit / Credit Indicator Report Currency Amount in Reporting Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User Released User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Data distribution of vendors for invoice value Count by user ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_06_APCS302 PAGE 14

Identifies where the payment release date falls on a weekend ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 15

CONTEXT Vendor payments, being a standard and regular organizational process, are expected to be executed during normal business hours. Payments over weekends may indicate fraudulent or suspicious activity and should be reviewed for such. RISK Potentially invalid or fraudulent vendor transactions which may result in overpayment to vendors or often irrecoverable financial losses. PROCEDURE Identifies where the payment release date falls on a weekend. Release dates are utilized as this is the point of authorization and are expected to take place during normal business hours; occurrence on a weekend could indicate unusual or unauthorized transactions. ANALYTIC LOGIC Analyses all payment release dates in the system and indicates if this date falls on a Saturday or Sunday whereby it will be listed as an exception. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Accounting Document Number Day of Week Vendor Invoice Number Document Date Clearing Date Debit / Credit Indicator Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Pay User ID Pay User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Percentage values per vendor Weekend values group by user ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_07_APCS112 PAGE 16

Identifies where invoices were captured over a weekend ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE17

CONTEXT Invoice capturing, being a standard and regular organizational process, is expected to be executed during normal business hours. Capturing over weekends may indicate fraudulent/suspicious activity and should be reviewed for such. RISK Potentially invalid or fraudulent vendor transactions which may result in overpayment to vendors or often irrecoverable financial losses. PROCEDURE Identifies where invoices were captured over a weekend. All invoices captured in the ERP system will have an automatic entry/capture date attached which cannot be amended. The invoice date (as printed on an invoice by a supplier) is not the date used for this analytic. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts where the entry/capture date of invoices fall on a Saturday or Sunday whereby it will be listed as an exception. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Debit / Credit Indicator Report Currency Amount in Reporting Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Day of Week Released User Name Heatmap showing the user and quantity Values grouped by vendor ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_08_APCS301 PAGE 18

Produces a list of invoices paid above a configurable threshold to determine authorization process for testing ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 19

CONTEXT All vendor invoices should be approved in terms of the correct level of authority for the organization. Differing levels of authority are required for purchases or invoices above certain levels; more senior people in the organization approve higher value and materially significant transactions. RISK Inappropriately reviewed and authorized transactions which could be caused by a lack of, or outdated, level of authority. PROCEDURE Produces a listing of invoices paid above a configurable threshold (financial value) to determine authorization process for testing. These transactions should be tested for accuracy, validity and approval. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts invoices greater than the client-configured threshold to create a listing for level of authority testing by audit. VARIABLE Threshold value (for selecting invoices which are greater than this value) OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Debit / Credit Indicator Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User Release User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Value of transactions by vendor and releaser Quantity and value of transactions by vendor ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_09_APCS110 PAGE 20

Identifies where the invoice date precedes the purchase order approval date ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 21

CONTEXT Best practice procurement procedures dictate that purchase order approvals should precede an invoice. Any purchase orders approved after an invoice should be reviewed and examined to understand the reasons and if there was a control breakdown. RISK Ineffective procurement due to finance and procurement procedures not being followed which may result in the payment of invalid or unapproved purchases. PROCEDURE Identifies where the invoice date precedes the purchase order approval date. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts invoices and related purchase orders where the invoice date is before the purchase order approval date. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Vendor Invoice Number Accounting Document Number Document Type Document Date Purchase Order Creation Date Days Difference Purchase Order Number Purchase Order User Name Purchase Order User ID Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Incl VAT Document Currency OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Date and materiality comparison Days difference analysis by vendor ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_10_APCS111 PAGE 22

Identifies the most recent instances where vendor invoices are paid by both a purchase order and by a sundry expense ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 23

CONTEXT Vendor payments are expected to be as a result of a transaction in either the procurement system (via purchase order) or a sundry expense. A vendor should be processed through either process but not both. Sundry expenses require less processing and attract less controls. RISK Unauthorised invoices outside the scope defined in the purchase order could be paid because less stringent procurement controls exist for sundry expenses. This may result in unauthorized,invalid, excessive or potentially fraudulent payments. PROCEDURE Identifies the most recent instances where vendor invoices are paid by both a purchase order and by a sundry expense. These vendors should be reviewed to understand why they are being paid as both a procurement and sundry expense when it is expected all transactions should be in line with a purchase order for a repetitive vendor. ANALYTIC LOGIC Summarizes vendors' invoices to extract the latest transactions where vendor invoices were processed through both a sundry expense and a purchase order. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Debit / Credit Indicator Report Currency Amount in Reporting Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Accounting Document Number Document Date Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number Release User Released User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Count of transactions by vendor Amount by vendor and release user ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_11_APCS109 PAGE 24

Extracts all invoices exceeding the value of the related approved purchase orders ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 25

CONTEXT A vendor invoice should not typically exceed the value approved in the purchase order as the underlying procurement process has vetted the vendor at a predetermined price. RISK Invoices exceeding purchase orders could be caused by unauthorised changes to the initially agreed upon services or goods. This may result in unauthorised spending, overspending or potentially fraudulent spending. PROCEDURE Extracts all invoices exceeding the value of the related approved purchase order. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts and compares the value on the invoice to the total value of the approved purchase order and identifies instances where invoice value exceed the purchase order value. In some countries, the effect of VAT or Sales tax can be removed from the invoice or added to the purchase order value before comparison is done. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Purchase Order Amount in Document Currency Purchase Order Amount in Document Currency Incl VAT Invoice Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Document Number Purchase Order Number Purchase Order Creation Date Purchase Order User ID Purchase Order User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Showing quantity grouped by the user Showing a date analysis by vendor ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_12_APCS106 PAGE 26

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Identifies manually paid invoices where the three way match with the purchase order and goods received note did not result in an automatically released payment, or where the payment was manually released ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 27

CONTEXT A three-way-match is performed between a purchase order, goods received note and invoice to ensure details are correct before making payment to the vendor. A payment should not be automatically made unless this match is performed and reconciliation achieved. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES RISK Fictitious, invalid or incorrect payments are caused by a user manually releasing a payment to a vendor and not relying on the automatic payment from a successful three-way-match. PROCEDURE Identifies manually released invoices (paid and unpaid) where a three-waymatch, between the invoice, purchase order and goods received note did not occur. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all invoices and highlights transactions without correct three-waymatch which have been manually released for payment (either before or after payment). Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Amount in Reporting Currency Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Document Currency Document Date Accounting Document Number Vendor Invoice Number Vendor Stripped Invoice Number PO Number Release User Released User Name OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Three-way-match violations, grouped by releasing user Three-way-match violations: Vendor and PO number ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_13_APCS101 PAGE 28

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Re-performs the three way match using purchase order and invoice amounts and purchase order, goods received and invoice quantities ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAGE 29

CONTEXT A three-way-match is performed between a purchase order, goods received note and invoice to ensure details are correct before making payment to the vendor. A payment should not be made unless this match is performed and reconciliation achieved. RISK Fictitious, invalid or incorrect payments made on transactions not correctly matched. PROCEDURE Identifies invoices (paid and unpaid) where the invoice amount and purchase order amount differ as well as where a three-way-match, between the invoice, purchase order and goods received note quantities did not occur. ANALYTIC LOGIC Extracts all invoices and highlights transactions without correct three-waymatch between purchase order, good received note and invoice quantities and invoice and purchase order amounts. OUTPUT RESULTS FIELD NAMES Company Code Company Name Vendor ID Vendor Name Amount in Reporting Currency PO Number Report Currency Amount in Document Currency Excl VAT Amount in Document Currency Incl VAT Difference Document Currency Purchase Order Amount In Document Currency Purchase Order Quantity Good Received Quantity Invoice Quantity Purchase Order Creation Date OUTPUT VISUALIZATION EXAMPLES Three-way-match violations, grouped by releasing user Three-way-match violations: Vendor and PO number ACL ESSENTIALS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AP_ANALYTIC_14_APCS602 PAGE 30