MPC-514 July 21, 2016

Similar documents
BACKGROUND. The FasTracks Plan includes three core goals:

Mobility on Demand. Operational Concept Report. Final Report September 2017 FHWA-JPO

Integrating discrete choice modeling with social interactions to examine how travelers react to uncertainty caused by extreme weather conditions

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Overcoming Barriers to Mixed-Use Infill Development: Let s Get Trip Generation Right

Mobility on Demand for Improving Business Profits and User Satisfaction

Freeway Management/Managed Lanes - New Publications/Resources:

A Research Report from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation. December 2016

Policy Brief. Three Transportation Revolutions: Synergies with Transit. Summary. Introduction

DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 1290 BROADWAY, SUITE 100 DENVER, CO

UK Road Pricing Feasibility Study: Modelling the Impacts Elizabeth Cox 1 UK

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

innovation brief on Mobility as a Service

USING TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY DATA TO DEVELOP CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS.

Mobility on Demand (MOD) Sandbox Program. Carol Schweiger, President Schweiger Consulting LLC September 7, 2016

Mobility as a Service as an example needs of customers. Teemu Surakka & Tero Haahtela

STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 2 MAY 16, 2017

Job Announcement. Student Trainee/Internship Oakland Department of Transportation

Webinar: MaaS Up America! Mobility as a Service Implementation Review and Operation

General Population Survey Summary

A Discrete Choice Framework for Modeling and Forecasting The Adoption and Diffusion of New Transportation Services

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

Michigan Integrated Food and Farming Systems 2005 Marketing & Communications Plan

The New Zealand National Transport Model

Kent County Transit Needs Assessment Scope of Work

Guidelines for answering the following cases:

Transit Service Guidelines

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

Arriva for your whole journey

CHAPTER IV REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT PROVIDERS

MAASiFiE - Mobility As A Service For Linking Europe

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

TPB Scenario Study Task Force: Proposal for Development and Analysis of Two New Scenarios

EDMONTON S TRANSIT STRATEGY

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

ABC Ramps Transportation Options Program Plan Scope of Work Kick off meeting 10/5/2016

TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS PROGRAM PLAN TAP MEETING #1 1/23/17

Transportation Demand Management Element

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003

The Lyft App. July 2016

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

Greater Newcastle Transport Plan

EVALUATING AND COMMUNICATING MODEL RESULTS: GUIDEBOOK FOR PLANNERS

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

Sustainability. Sustainability Principles. 1. Framework. Spokane Transit s definition of Sustainability is:

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

Re: Mobility Plan 2035 FEIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis

ADVANCED TRAVELLER INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CHANDIGARH CITY USING GIS

Theja Tulabandhula. Xerox Research Centre India. Optimal Automated Booking of On-Demand Transportation

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

METRO VANCOUVER MOBILITY PRICING INDEPENDENT COMMISSION FINAL TERMS OF REFERENCE. Revised - June 30, 2017

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Testing Activity-Based Model Component Transferability at the Individual Component and System Level

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

CHAPTER 8 SUSTAINABILITY

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL MARKETING AND SEGMENTATION

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT PLANNING: A QUEENSLAND EXPERIENCE

Davidson, Peters & Brakewood 1 INTERACTIVE TRAVEL MODES: UBER, TRANSIT AND MOBILITY IN NEW YORK CITY.

State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee

Enabling intermodal urban transport through complementary services: from Flexible Mobility Services to the Shared Use Mobility Agency

Public Transport Quality and Travel Experience: The Italian Case Study

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Statewide Model Application Using the Texas SAM

Preparing our Roadways for Connected and Automated Vehicles. 70th Annual Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Bob Edelstein

SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT CHOICES AND THE RETAIL SECTOR. Jo Baker Mott MacDonald

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning

MPC-486 June 25, 2015

MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION

Mobility-As-A- Service (MaaS)

Transit Demand Analysis

Comprehensive Operational Review Final Report Presentation. October 2017

Your Ticket to Smarter Service

Presentation On Vehicle Telematics 2017

A Mobility Information Management System for Rural Transportation:

TEXAS MEXICO TRANSPORTATION BORDER MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Management and Integration of Data and Modeling at Santa Clara County Congestion Management Agency

According to the results of a new survey by The International Parking Institute

Does Gen Y want the keys to the car? The changing nature of mobility

MARKET SEGMENTATION AND ITS BENEFITS

Modeling Participation and Consumption in the Greek Interurban Public Transportation Market

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

SustainCity Brussels case study Zurich, April 2013 Sylvie Gayda, Inês Cabrita

Mobility Pricing Conference: Perspectives on Transit, Equity, and Fare Policy / Setting. Brendon Hemily, PhD

Governor Baldacci s Transportation Bond Proposal

New Jersey Pilot Study

Content of the module

Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

Attitudes and Behavioral Responses to Parking Measures

Uber Ambassadors South Africa

Rebound Effect: Overview and Recent Research. Joshua Linn NYU Transportation Workshop October 2011

Institute of Transportation Engineers Inc.

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE FREIGHT RESEARCH PROGRAM Current and Completed Projects

VICE MINISTER FOR TRANSPORTATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Uncongested Mobility for All: A Proposal for an Area Wide Autonomous Taxi System in New Jersey

Transcription:

MPC-514 July 21, 2016 Project Title: Impacts of Ridesourcing on VMT, Parking Demand, Transportation Equity, and Travel Behavior University: University of Colorado Denver Principal Investigator: Wesley Marshall, PhD, PE Associate Professor University of Colorado Denver Department of Civil Engineering wesley.marshall@ucdenver.edu Co-Principal Investigator: Bruce Janson, PhD, PE Professor University of Colorado Denver Department of Civil Engineering bruce.janson@ucdenver.edu Research Needs: The transportation sector is currently experiencing a monumental disruption with the introduction and evolution of transportation services such as bikesharing, carsharing, ridesharing, and on-demand ridesourcing (e.g. Lyft, Uber). Many factors including social networks, real-time information, and mobile technology allow passengers and drivers to connect through mobile smartphone applications (i.e. apps). In turn, this led to the creation and popularization of ridesourcing companies offering an app-based on-demand platform. As these new layers of technology-based transportation options begin to flourish, it is important to understand how they compete and interact with more traditional modes. Beyond travel behavior, these evolving transportation services can also significantly impact our transportation systems, society, and the environment. Yet, these outcomes have yet to be adequately studied in the academic literature. Accordingly, this research will investigate the travel modes replaced by these evolving services and why people shifted from a previous mode. More specifically, we will investigate new trips that may not have occurred before (i.e. induced travel) as well as multimodality (i.e. availability of several modes) and intermodality (i.e. combination of various modes for a single trip or mixed-modes) in order to analyze the impact of these services on the overall transportation system in terms of vehicle miles traveled (VMT), parking demand, transportation equity, and travel behavior. In theory, providing a more diverse array of travel options may reduce car dependence and lower parking demand; in practice, however, there are still unresolved questions about what cities actually gain (or lose) with ridesourcing in terms of sustainability-related outcomes such as mode choice, VMT, carbon emissions, as well as transportation equity issues. For instance when replacing 1

single occupancy vehicle (SOV) trips, there is a potential for negative effects. If a person shifts from driving to ridesourcing, the ride-source driver may travel additional mileage to pick them up or after dropping them off than what would have been driven with the initial trip. There is also a theoretical saturation point where higher ridesourcing supply than demand leaves many drivers circulating without riders, which can cause unnecessary VMT, congestion, environmental issues, and other problems that are not yet documented with respect to these new technology-based modal options. While there is robust information online regarding companies such as Uber and Lyft, the academic literature on ridesourcing is extremely limited due to the lack of open data on these services. This research will employ a combination of revealed-behavior data and stated-response data structures collected via travel data records, travel diaries, and individual surveys using an innovative approach that combines information gathered from the Lyft/Uber driver and passenger interviews. We will assess the travel modes replaced by ridesourcing including new trips, multimodal trips, and intermodal trips in order to gather insights from individuals on the process of why a specific mode was selected over the alternatives. For example, what is the role of travel time, travel cost, and parking ease in the decision making process? Other measurements will include VMT impacts and equity issues with the introduction of ridesourcing in our transportation systems. We will then be able to provide insights into the different impact levels of ridesourcing based on the characteristics of a region or a city. We hypothesize that the effects on VMT, parking demand, and equity issues vary among different geographical areas (e.g. urban vs. suburban vs. rural, city size, density) and mode share distribution (e.g. the higher the driving mode share for a city the more positive effects the city will experience with ridesourcing). As a result, this research will be relevant for the region and beyond. Also, current transportation travel models focus on traditional modes of transportation (i.e. car, transit, walk, and bike), but few models appropriating take into account the impacts of ridesourcing (e.g. Lyft, Uber) (DuPuis et al., 2015). Thus, this research will also fill a gap in the literature by studying the effects of evolving services on travel behavior, which will help cities and regional transportation organizations better account for the impact of technology and evolving transportation services in their transportation planning processes. Research Objectives: The objectives and key contributions of this research are that we will build upon the existing literature on evolving transportation services by: 1. Developing surveys for ridesourcing passengers and drivers and seeking IRB approval; 2. Collecting a unique dataset via a survey of ridesourcing passengers and drivers; 3. Assessing what travel modes are replaced by these evolving transportation services; 4. Measuring the VMT and parking demand impacts of ridesourcing services; 5. Investigating transportation equity variation across different geographical areas; 6. Evaluating the factors associated with why people shifted from their previous travel modes; and 7. Developing a framework for a mode choice model that would allow for integrating ridesourcing services into regional travel models. 2

Research Methods: This research will initiate with a thorough literature review of research related to ridesourcing services such as Lyft and Uber as well as other current transportation options including carsharing services that could impact VMT, parking demand, and travel behavior in general. While there is robust information online regarding companies such as Uber and Lyft, the academic literature on ridesourcing remains relatively limited due to the lack of open data on these services. We first plan to collect a minimum of 500 surveys focused on current and previous travel behavior from ridesource drivers and their passengers. For instance, the proposed survey will ask passengers questions regarding current travel behaviors, available modal options, modality resources (e.g. car ownership, transit pass, etc.) for both typical transportation patterns and for specific trip characteristics to the ridesourcing service. The survey will cover regular travel behaviors prior to ridesourcing options becoming available as well as socio-demographic/socio-economic status. We will then collect data from the ridesourcing drivers such as times, locations, and total VMT broken down by cruising for a ride, driving to passenger, and ride distance. This data collection effort will facilitate a travel behavior comparison that will allow us to quantify the VMT and parking demand impacts of these evolving transportation services. For our research objective focusing on evaluating transportation equity variation, we plan to combine the data collected from the ridesource drivers (e.g. passenger waiting time and passenger/trip characteristics) with spatially located socio-economic and socio-demographic data. This will allow us to conduct a transportation equity analysis across different populations and geographic areas to see where these services are more or less accessible and by whom. This step will also let us revisit outcomes such as VMT and parking demand from a spatial perspective, which could facilitate, for instance, a better understanding regarding how the findings shift across the rural to urban spectrum. Our last research objective focuses on better understanding the mode choice decision process related to ridesourcing services. This involves building a statistical model of travel mode choice for ridesourcing based on the survey data collected combined with transportation and land use data. The model will implement an econometric analysis that accounts for the influence of latent modal preference and logit mixture models on travel mode choice behavior (Atasoy et al., 2011; Vij et al., 2013; Vij and Walker, 2014). For example, Vij et al. (2013) introduced the concept of modality style, which can be defined as a certain travel mode or set of travel modes that an individual habitually uses. This idea counters the conventional assumption that people choose a mode independently for every trip and instead investigates short- and long-term decisions as a function of higher-level behavior orientations. We will also explore how one s modality style might shift with the introduction of ridesourcing options. The proposed models will require us to collect the following data: Characteristics of the individual and household; Land use characteristics (for both origin and destination locations); Modality style (e.g. car-oriented, multimodal with car, non-car, or bi-style); Modality resources (e.g. car ownership, transit pass, carsharing membership, etc.); and Travel attributes (e.g. travel time, travel cost, parking, etc.). 3

The intent is to better understand the actual motivations why a ridesourcing user chooses this mode over the alternatives and use this knowledge to create the framework for a statistical mode choice with ridesourcing services that can be integrated into regional travel models. For example, the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) conducts a travel survey every decade to feed into their activity-based travel model. With this research, we are hoping to guide and provide input into what survey questions and data from ridesourcing need to be incorporated into the models to account for new and evolving transportation services. Expected Outcomes: This work will employ a combination of revealed-behavior data and stated-response data structures to fill a needed gap in the literature regarding the evolving transportation services. The expected outcomes of this research include: 1. A better understanding regarding the role of evolving transportation services in the overall transportation system; 2. An assessment of the impact of ridesourcing on VMT and parking demand; 3. An evaluation of transportation equity variations across different socio-economic and sociodemographic populations as well as different geographies due to ridesourcing; 4. A framework for mode choice models that better accounts for the presence of ridesourcing and evolving transportation services; 5. Manuscripts for presentation/publication at TRB and other peer-reviewed journals; and 6. Presentations to academic and policy audiences. Relevance to Strategic Goals: This research falls mainly under the strategic goal of environmental sustainability, but it also relates to livable communities and economic competitiveness. An assessment of VMT and parking demand, as well as the transportation equity variations, defines the environmental sustainability impacts of ridesourcing into our cities and transportation systems. A better understanding regarding the role of evolving transportation services will help guide policies with respect to the acceptance and applications of new services, which in turn, will allow cities to be more environmental sustainable, livable, and equitable. The results will offer a better understanding of the situations where negative effects may occur and help more cities adapt to the new spectrum of transportation options available to the population. Educational Benefits: This study will be integrated into Dr. Marshall s Sustainable Transportation Systems graduate course through a case study approach that will present research materials to the students and provide the opportunity for students to get involved in data collection and analysis as part of their term projects. The course is based in the Civil Engineering Department but cross-listed in Urban and Regional Planning as well as Public Administration. The GIS data will also be made available to students in the Master s of Engineering GIS program for use in term projects or master s reports. As a result, this project will influence students from a variety of disciplines that comprise our future transportation professionals. 4

Work Plan: The proposed scope of work is scheduled for a one year timeframe, beginning with notice to proceed from the Mountain Plains Consortium. The main steps for this research include: Action Ite m Literature Review Develop driver data collection and IRB Process Data Collection Preliminary Data analysis Final Methodology Selection Organize and Geocode Data Data Analysis and generalize findings Write-up Disseminate key findings and publish 2016 Fe b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and/or peer-reviewed conference proceedings as well as presented at various conferences. Project Cost: Total Project Cost: $154,422 MPC Funds Requested: $77,000 Matching Funds: $77,422 Source of Matching Funds: University of Colorado Denver TRB Keywords: Ridesourcing, Lyft, Uber, VMT, parking demand, transportation modality styles equity, travel behavior, mode choice, 5

References: Atasoy, B., Glerum, A., Bierlaire, M., 2011. Mode choice with attitudinal latent class: A Swiss casestudy, 2nd International Choice Modelling Conference, Leeds, Leeds, UK. DuPuis, N., Martin, C., Rainwater, B., 2015. City of the Future: Technology & Mobility. National League of Cities. Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L., 2013. Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 54, 164-178. Vij, A., Walker, J.L., 2014. Preference endogeneity in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 64, 90-105. 6