VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OFFICE OF WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS 2001 FISH TISSUE AND SEDIMENT MONITORING PLAN

Similar documents
Estimating the effects of Climate Change The Chesapeake Atlantis Model:

PCB BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS IN POTOMAC ESTUARY FISH

Details of DO Criteria. Peter Tango EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office March 16, 2011

Fish Habitat Outcome Management Strategy , v.1

Final Total Maximum Daily Load for the Monongahela River, Greene County PCBs and Chlordane

Georgia Coastal Management Program

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Update to the Forage Action Team February 16 th 2017

Cheryl A. Niemi Washington Department of Ecology February 9,

Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor: Ecosystem Condition. Michael J. Kennish Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences Rutgers University

NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Biennial Report to Congress Fiscal Years

DEVELOPING TMDLs FOR ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES AND PCBs 1

PCBs and Dioxin in the Galveston Bay System. Hanadi Rifai, PhD, PE Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Houston November 27, 2012

Order Form. MANUALS ON CD-ROM s TOTAL COST QUANTITY

Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2016

References and Resources

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER OUTSIDE AGENCY DATA AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Modeling to Assess Influence of Water Withdrawals On Estuarine Species in Charlotte Harbor, Florida

Stormwater Quality Trades: Virginia Farms and Highways

Tackling Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) & Toxins Through TMDLs

Thank you to all of the farms and agencies that provided the data to us for this presentation!

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

The Galveston Bay Estuary Program and Partnerships

ECOSYSTEMS, WATERSHEDS AND POLLUTION CONTROL REVIEW

Pollution. Pollution refers any substance introduced into the environment that has harmful or poisonous effects

Chesapeake Bay. report card

OVERVIEW COEUR D ALENE RIVER BASIN. Fisheries Management in the Coeur d Alene River Basin, Idaho and Superfund Legislation

John Vile, MS Water Monitoring & Standards Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring

Bay Barometer. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is. A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Habitat GIT Fish Passage, Brook Trout, Cosatal Habitats STAC Workshop (Mike Slattery)

Annual Update. Large-Scale Oyster Restoration in Support of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement Oyster Goal. Stephanie Reynolds Westby, NOAA

Physical, Chemical and Vegetative Characteristics of the Homosassa River. Prepared for: Citrus County Task Force 10 September 2012

BIO-POLLUTION: HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS IN VIRGINIA WATERS

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

2009 STATE OF THE RIVER REPORT FOR THE LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN: WATER QUALITY, FISHERIES, AQUATIC LIFE, & CONTAMINANTS

James River Alternatives Analysis June 23, 2005

NORTH CAROLINA AQUACULTURE UPDATE 2011

Subtitle E Delaware River Basin Conservation

San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site Technical Document Review: Public Health Assessment (PHA) October 30, 2012

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

South Carolina Water Quality Standards. Heather Preston DHEC Bureau of Water October 14, 2008

Climate Change Impacts of Most Concern for CB Agreement Goal & Outcome Attainment

Recent Developments in Water Withdrawal Management

Assessment of Mercury Contamination and Bioaccumulation in Sarasota Bay

Red Rock Lake: A Path Forward

The Importance of the Pearl River to Mississippi s Estuarine Habitats Jennifer Buchanan Education Coordinator

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

Adapting Living Shorelines: Siting and Design for Climate Impacts

Where Do All the Toxins Go? (External View)

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: PHASE I TMDLs FOR TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN THE DELAWARE RIVER ESTUARY

Sunday, February 24, 13. Heavy Metal Toxicity

Newtown Creek Superfund Site Risk Assessment Data CAG Meeting December 16, 2015

Greater Trinity River Bacteria TMDL Project

The Clean Water Act and Sediment Remediation

Estuary Adventures. Background. Objective

Literature Review The Environmental Concerns of Arsenic Additives in Poultry Litter

Improved health of Chesapeake Bay in 2009

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

PROTECTING OUR WATERWAYS: STORMWATER POLLUTION REDUCTION EFFORTS

J. Sargeant Reynolds Community College. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Action Plan

Chesapeake Bay Blue Crabs and Consumption Related Illness

Portage Lake Hubbard County

Chapter 8 - IMPACT OF MERCURY ON NJ S ECOSYSTEMS

STATE OF LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Volunteer educators, citizen scientists, and stewards helping Virginians conserve and manage natural resources and public lands

Mapping ecosystem services for National Park Service management

Proposed Data layers for PCB Resource Center

Nutrients & Algal Blooms Developing water quality standards for the James River.

Renewable Energy Leasing and

Quantification & Source Identification of Microplastic Pollution in the Hudson River 2017 Report

COASTAL WATERSHED CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF FORT PULASKI NATIONAL MONUMENT

Canada s National Programme of Action. for the Protection of the Marine Environment. from Land-based Activities (NPA)

Lesson 7: Biomagnification

2010 Use Assessment Methodology August 31, 2010

Comments on Delta Contaminated Sediment Issues. G. Fred Lee & Associates E. El Macero Dr. El Macero, CA

Climate Change and Chesapeake Bay Habitats

Food Chains, Food Webs, and Bioaccumulation Background

Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

BUILDING LAND IN COASTAL LOUISIANA. Report Summary

Site Status Report for the

An Update on the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Marine Minerals Program Studies Jennifer Culbertson and Doug Piatkowski

Water Quality Resilience and Policy in an Integrated Urban and Agricultural Water Basin

Coastal Resource Management Planning

East Tacoma PCB Investigation Results & Next Steps

Impacts of ocean acidification on marine life in Long Island Sound. Christopher J. Gobler, PhD

Utah s Water Quality Data

Development of a Sediment Remedial Action Objective for Tributyltin

Avista Dam Relicensing Factsheet Commenting on the Draft License Application

Status of the Ohio River Basin Fish Habitat Partnership

2 to 3 class periods Acute Bioaccumulation Biomass Community Ecosystem Environment Population Relative abundances Species abundances

Environmental Toxicology and exploring ATSDR toxicological profiles

A PILOT STUDY FOR ASSESSING FRESHWATER FLOW IMPACTS TO LOUISIANA ESTUARIES

Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Awareness Presentation. March 8 th, :00AM 12:00PM Video Conference

Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

Transcription:

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OFFICE OF WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS 2001 FISH TISSUE AND SEDIMENT MONITORING PLAN March 19, 2001

Introduction The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Water Quality Standards Unit (WQS) is responsible for the design and execution of the Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program. This document provides information concerning the proposed stations for monitoring fish tissue and sediment during 2001 and the rationale for the station selection. Objective The objective of the Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program is to systematically assess and evaluate, using a multi-tier screening, water-bodies of Virginia in order to identify toxic contaminant accumulation adversely affecting human users of the resource and the total biological community. Data collected will be used to quantify human health risks and ecological/environmental health conditions. In addition, follow-up studies are conducted when problems are found and/or when recommended by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) via a memorandum of understanding between VDH and DEQ. VDH uses data generated by this program to assess the need for issuing or modifying fish consumption advisories Sampling Design The water-bodies of Virginia are separated into fourteen river basins or sub-basins. In the past, the fish tissue and sediment were sampled in all fourteen of the river basins within a five-year cycle following procedures stated in the DEQ Quality Assurance/Quality Control Project Plan for the Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program. In April 2000, the General Assembly amended section 62.1-44.19:5 of the code of Virginia and instructed the DEQ to sample all of the river basins within a three-year rotational cycle contingent upon available funding. Three river basins have been selected for the 2001-sampling season: the James, Rappahannock, and Potomac/Shenandoah River Basins. At the time staff developed this monitoring plan the total amount of funding available for 2001 calendar-year sample-season was uncertain since the State General Assembly was still in session and the agency budget was not finalized. If additional funding necessary for the three-year rotation is not available, the program will convert to the five-year rotational cycle and staff will only sample the James and Rappahannock River Basins. A total of 91 proposed fish tissue and/or sediment sampling stations have been selected within the basins. Sites within each basin are ranked from 1 to 3 with 1 being the highest priority and 3 the lowest priority. The rank is based on known or potential water quality problems at the sample location, special requests by the VDH or citizen groups, and/or if the sample location is a relatively intensive resource for recreational or commercial fishing. Priority will be given to sites with the highest rank if funding will not allow all sites to be sampled. Extensive effort will be made to complete all of the stations finally selected, but if equipment problems and/or severe weather impact(s) the sampling schedule, priority will be given to stations where water quality problems have been historically documented. Most of the sample sites are freshwater; however, several are brackish or saltwater locations. The samples that will be collected at each freshwater station include, one sediment sample and three to five tissue composite samples (5-10 individuals per composite) consisting of fish species that are typically consumed by humans. Samples will include at least one bottom feeder (e.g. catfish sp.), which may be highly exposed to contaminated sediments compared to other species, and two to four top trophic level feeders (e.g. bass and blue gill sp.), which may be exposed to contaminants via biomagnification. Collection of targeted species for tissue analysis at the brackish and saltwater sites may be problematic since only 10-15% of the fish and shellfish species at the stations are year-round residents and few of the resident species are typically consumed by humans (Murdy et. al. 1997). It is likely that sample collection techniques will yield several species of migratory fish and shellfish that are consumed by humans and a few resident fish species that are not consumed by humans. Contaminants found in migratory fishes may not reflect local pollution problems but may be used to calculate human health risks from consumption. 2

Contaminants found in sediment and resident fishes may be used to identify local inputs of bioaccumulative contaminants. Therefore, the samples that will be collected at each brackish or saltwater station include one sediment sample and three to five composite samples (5-10 individuals per composite) consisting of an edible migratory, an edible or non-edible resident, and an edible or non-edible bottom species. The entire data set should help determine if any unacceptable human health risks are associated with fish consumption, and if local inputs of bioaccumulative contaminants are in tissue and/or sediment at levels of concern. For a detailed list of species that will be targeted at each brackish or saltwater station see Table 1. All samples collected by the Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program will be analyzed for metal and organic contaminants by the College of William and Mary/Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Station Selection Criteria The stations in each basin have been selected to produce site specific conclusions and provide spatial coverage of the entire basin. The following criteria were used to select the 2001 sampling stations: 1) Historical Data Review 2) Spatial Distribution 3) Specific Water Quality Problems 4) Major Tributary Status 5) External Request from other VADEQ offices, State Agencies, or citizen groups 6) Point Source 7) Nonpoint Source 8) Major Fishery The attached references were used in selecting the sampling stations. The station number, priority rank, river mile, latitude, longitude, criteria for selection, and corresponding USGS topographical survey map name for each proposed sampling station are provided (see table 2). Summary maps showing the location of all of the proposed sample stations are attached (see figure. 1-3). Sample Collection and Reporting Fish tissue and sediment samples will be collected in the early spring through late fall, 2001. Data for all of the samples should be received from the laboratory by June 2002. The data will be tabulated as it is received and sent to VDH per an October 2000 Memorandum of Agreement between the VDH and DEQ. VDH will make an evaluation regarding potential human health impacts due to contaminated fish consumption and issue a fish consumption advisories or bans as needed. The tabulated data will also be sent to the water quality/monitoring managers at the impacted DEQ Regional Office(s) and sent to the DEQ webmaster for posting on the DEQ web site at: http://www.deq.state.va.us/fishtissue/ 3

Table 1. Target species at each of the brackish water or saltwater stations. Migratory Fish Resident Fish Benthic Fish/Shellfish (Normally consumed (Some may not be consumed (Some may not be consumed by humans) by humans) by humans) Striped Bass White Perch Oyster spp. Spot Yellow Perch Clam spp. Atlantic Croaker Killifish, Banded Blue Crab Weak Fish Killifish, Striped Summer Flounder Black Sea Bass Killifish,Rainwater Smallmouth Flounder Spotted Seatrout Killifish, Marsh Oyster Toadfish Black Drum Killifish, Spotfin Hogchoker Red Drum Mummichogs Tongue Fish Silver Perch Sheepshead Minnow Channel Catfish Northern Kingfish Silverside, Inland White Catfish Southern Kingfish Silverside, Rough Gulf Kingfish Silverside, Atlantic Bluefish Bay Anchovy Gizzard Shad =========================================================== 4

References Department of Environmental Quality.1989-2000. Statewide Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program Data Files. Richmond, Department of Environmental Quality. 1994. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin # 587, 1994-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1991 To June 30, 1993. Richmond, Department of Environmental Quality. 1998. Virginia Water Quality Assessment, 1998 305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1992 To June 30, 1997. Richmond, Department of Environmental Quality. 1998. Draft Report-Virginia 303 (d) TMDL Priority List, June 1998. Richmond, Department of Environmental Quality. 1998. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Project Plan for the Fish Tissue and Sediment Monitoring Program. Richmond, Department of Environmental Quality. 2000. Virginia Water Quality Assessment, 2000 305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period January 1, 1994 To December 31, 1998. Richmond, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. 1999. Virginia Freshwater Fishing Guide. Richmond, Elizabeth River Project. Letter Dated June 29, 2000 regarding fish tissue sampling in the Elizabeth River. Memorandum of Agreement Between the Virginia Department of Health and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality for the Timely Transmission of Fish Consumption Advisory Information, October 2000. Murdy, O. M., Ray S. Birdsong, J.A. Musick. 1997. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London. State Water Control Board. 1975. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin 509, 1975-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1976. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin 526, 1976-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1980. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin 542, 1978-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1982. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin 548, 1986-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period October 1, 1979 To September 30, 1981, Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1986. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin 565, 1986-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1983 To June 30, 1985, Vol. 1-2. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1988. Virginia Water Quality Assessment, 1988-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1985 To June 30, 1987, Vol. 1-2. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1990. Virginia Water Quality Assessment, 1990-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1987 To June 30, 1989, Vol.1-3. Richmond, State Water Control Board. 1992. Virginia Water Quality Assessment Bulletin # 588, 1992-305 (B) Report to EPA Administrator and Congress for the Period July 1, 1989 To June 30, 1991, Vol.1-3. Richmond, Tingler, J.N. et. al. 1990. Comprehensive Review of Selected Toxic Substances-Environmental Samples In Virginia State Water Control Board-Bulletin 583. Richmond, 5

6