A Climate Change Response Framework for the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Similar documents
The Eastern Region s Approach to Climate Change Response and the Performance Scorecard

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Tree Survival 15 Years after the Ice Storm of January 1998

EVOLUTION OF A MEETING: 20+ YEARS OF RESEARCH COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION

National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

Climate Change Research and Trees

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Upper Applegate Road Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas

Public Rock Collection

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

DECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline

Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

Managing Urban Forests in a Changing Climate 2014 Urban Tree Conference

Forest Restoration and Management in a Changing Climate: Implications for North Shore Watersheds

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)

Agroforestry Treasures in the USDA Farm Bill

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field. Climate Projections for Forests: A Quick Summary

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field

LYLE FREES Water Quality Specialist, NRCS Phone:

OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:

Adaptation and Forest. Conservation

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use

Decision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010

Forest Adaptation Resources: Climate Change Tools and Approaches for Land Managers, 2nd edition

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

CLIMATE CHANGE AND ITS EFFECTS ON ECOSYSTEMS

March 29, Caring for Trees in a Changing Climate

Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth

Civil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Land Values and Cash Rents: 2008 Summary

Climate Change and Vermont s Forests

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

Volunteerism for the Next Generation

Water Talk Series

Effects of All-Terrain Vehicles on Forested Lands and Grasslands

Seasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Non-Ambulatory Cattle and Calves

Wisconsin Natural Community Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments Vulnerability Determination Process

TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS

Carson National Forest El Rito Ranger District El Rito, New Mexico Outreach Response due by close of business on March 26, 2013.

DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE

Appendix B: Site Index Curves for Selected Tree Species. Interpreting Site Index Curves

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Major Findings Major Findings

Proposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

Ontario s Climate Change Adaptation Approach. Webinar Dates: November 16, 2017 November 23, 2017 November 30, 2017

Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the. Northeast Regional Action Plan

Ecosystem Services BUCK KLINE AND VIJAY A SATYAL

BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Community-Based Watershed Management

DECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106

West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

Forest Service Global Change Research Strategy

ADAPTING URBAN FORESTS TO CLIMATE CHANGE: APPROACHES FOR ACTION. Leslie Brandt

CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

Urban Connections Connecting citizens to the land Bridging the gap between our National Forests and our urban constituents.

U.S. Broiler Industry Structure

Evaluating the Ecological Impacts of Emerald Ash Borer (and Climate Change) in Black Ash Forests

USDA Forest Service Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years

Users Guide for Noble Fir Bough Cruiser

Sustaining Minnesota Forest Resources: Voluntary Site-Level Forest Management Guidelines for Landowners, Loggers and Resource Managers

Slash mats (figure 1) are used to help reduce impacts

N R C S. Farm Bill Projects on Vermont Vegetable and Berry Farms. Natural Resources Conservation Service

Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) Board of Directors. Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Watershed Knowledge. Watershed Management

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency Workshop:

Urban Ecosystem Analysis Buffalo-Lackawanna Area Erie County, New York

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

A Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator for a Mapped-Plot Sample Design in Southeast Alaska

Environmental Assessment

FORESTRY AND THE FIREWOOD INDUSTRY-AN OPEN DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSIONAL FORESTERS

Navigating the Climate Change Performance Scorecard

Puerto Rico - Various

Treatability of Underutilized Northeastern Species with CCA and Alternative Wood Preservatives

Adaptation Options for Managing Ecosystems; Coping with Climate Change Forest Service Research and Development Support for Management of Wildlands

ANALYSIS OF MILK MOVEMENTS FROM DAIRY FARMS TO MILK PROCESSING PLANTS: MAY 2016 PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER. Staff Paper John Mykrantz.

J. R. Ford P.O. Box 4490 Pagosa Springs, CO I m a business man trying to use a viable financial model to

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

Climate Change and Agriculture: How is USDA Helping Agriculture Respond

Buy Local, Buy Quality

Outdoor School Program. Roles & Responsibilities

Transcription:

US FOREST SERVICE NORTHERN RESEARCH STATION Research Review NO. 10 summer 2010 A Climate Change Response Framework for the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest Climate change poses a number of challenges to maintaining the health and vitality of the nation s forests. Over the next century, warmer temperatures and changes in precipitation and storm patterns are likely to increase the amount of stress on forested ecosystems, thus affecting tree growth and reproduction, ecosystem function, and the ability of forests to provide the benefits that people expect. As a result, it s becoming more important than ever for scientists, natural resource professionals, landowners, and others to work together to respond to these challenges across the landscapes that we all share. The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, has made this type of collaborative approach to land stewardship a priority for USDA and the Forest Service. He describes it as a shared vision, one that conserves our forests and the vital resources important to our survival while wisely respecting the need for a forest economy that creates jobs and vibrant rural communities. THE NORTHERN RESEARCH STATION IS RESPONDING TO CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH COLLABORATION As part of its goal of landscape-scale conservation, the U.S. Forest Service has already been placing greater emphasis on working across boundaries of all kinds bureaucratic, ecological, geographical, and political. In developing a climate change response framework, science partners are developing a model of collaboration. In this model, using the Chequamegon- Nicolet National Forest (CNNF) partners from the Forest Service (Northern Research Station, Northeastern Area, and the Eastern Region) along with the Northern Institute of Applied Carbon Science (NIACS) are using their expertise in various components of the project. NRS scientist and NIACS director Chris Swanston is leading the project and NIACS scientist Maria Janowiak is the project coordinator. continued on page 2 This scientist-manager partnership is proving to be a model in itself. Pooling our unique skills and resources to tackle such a complex problem makes sense. I can t imagine approaching it any other way. Linda Parker, CNNF Ecologist Linda Parker, U.S. Forest Service 1

continued from page one The project is designed to address the many complexities of climate change. It assesses the best available science for understanding how northern Wisconsin ecosystems will adapt to climate change and how these forests can help mitigate carbon emissions. It also works to build partnerships across ownership (private, state, tribal, and corporate) and organizational (citizens groups and national and local nongovernmental organizations) boundaries in northern Wisconsin that will help people to respond to climate change as well as incorporate science and monitoring information into management decisionmaking. ASSESSING POSSIBLE CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS Two assessment documents provide the necessary background on the current conditions of forest ecosystems in northern Wisconsin. The first assessment, prepared by Christopher Swanston and collaborators, examines the major influences on forests now and in the future. The Ecosystem Vulnerability Assessment and Synthesis focuses on the vulnerabilities of ecosystems in northern Wisconsin to climate change. It describes the current landscape and forest types of northern Wisconsin and summarizes how the climate of northern Wisconsin is projected to change by the end of the 21st century. The assessment uses two distinct approaches to understand the potential impacts of climate change on forests. In one approach, Northern Research Station (NRS) scientist Louis Iverson and his research team based in Delaware, OH, use their Climate Change Tree Atlas to predict possible changes in the suitability of conditions in northern Wisconsin for 76 tree species. Additionally, David Mladenoff from the University of Wisconsin Madison uses the LANDIS II model to examine how ecosystem processes within northern Wisconsin may change in the future. When combined, these two model approaches provide valuable insights into the responses of individual tree species to climate change. This information is being used to determine some of the possible implications of climate change on the forests of northern Wisconsin. Forests will probably experience a number of changes and this research suggests that one likely change is that many of the boreal and northern species currently common in northern Wisconsin, such as balsam fir, black spruce, and trembling aspen, may be less common or productive in the future. The second assessment, prepared by NRS scientist Richard Birdsey and others, examines the ways that northern Wisconsin forests can help mitigate increases in concentrations of the greenhouse gases responsible for climate change. The preliminary mitigation assessment provides a background on how much carbon is in the forests of northern Wisconsin. It also describes how management could be used to enhance carbon storage by increasing the amount of carbon in forests and wood products, reducing the loss of forest to other land uses, and increasing the use of wood for bioenergy. Both the vulnerability and mitigation assessments are considered living documents. The first version of each included as much as possible, given the timeline of the framework project. Future versions of both assessments will incorporate newly available data and model results, as well as social and economic considerations of climate change response. Linda Parker, U.S. Forest Service Maria Janowiak, NIACS Eddy flux towers (background) within the CNNF and across the country allow comparisons of net ecosystem production and seasonal patterns of CO 2 exchange for ecosystems. Ecosystems dominated by boreal and northern species (hemlock and black spruce) are some of the most vulnerable systems on the landscape because of both current and expected future stresses. 2

Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success. Henry Ford The Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest extends across the forested landscape of northern Wisconsin (prepared by Patricia Butler, NIACS). WORKING WITH NEIGHBORS ACROSS THE LANDSCAPE The northern Wisconsin forested landscape comprises a patchwork of land ownership types, including private individuals and families (49%), counties and local governments (17%), the National Forest System (13%), corporations (10%), the state (6%), and tribal nations (4%). Because climate change will affect all ecosystems and ownerships, the framework team launched the shared landscapes initiative to enhance communication and collaboration across boundaries in northern Wisconsin. Earlier this year, a workshop brought many of these northern Wisconsin forest landowners and other groups together to begin talking about climate change in their region. More than 65 neighbors attended the workshop to share their priorities and perspectives; these included representatives from federal, state, and county governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations, educational institutions, tribal representatives, and industry groups. Additionally, a shared landscapes work group, formed to carry on the discussions and partnerships that were established, is currently being facilitated by Barbara Tormoehlen of U.S. Forest Service s Northeastern Area. INTEGRATING SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT Natural resource professionals rely on scientific information to make decisions about how to manage ecosystems. In the context of climate change, it becomes even more important to provide these professionals with the best available information on possible climate change effects and management options. As part of this project, Leslie Brandt (NIACS/NRS) led a workshop in which more than 50 scientists and managers discussed how to improve use of current knowledge to help manage ecosystems under climate change. An important part of the discussion was how to monitor ecosystems to better understand the effects of climate change and provide feedback on the effectiveness of management decisions. A smaller group of NRS, state, and university scientists met on the final day of the meeting to establish a science applications and needs roundtable. The roundtable will act as a science incubator, seeking to use the CNNF as a living laboratory and providing important perspectives on the rapidly evolving science of climate change. The CNNF is already host to numerous scientific activities, and is an ideal setting to test climate change effects and management responses in a working national forest. 3

A FRAMEWORK FOR RESPONDING TO CLIMATE CHANGE All of the project components described above will be used to develop a climate change response framework that will bridge the gap between climate change-related research and on-theground management at the CNNF. The framework will bring together the information from the assessments and the expertise of the work groups to identify approaches for responding to climate change that are specific to the forests of the CNNF. It will provide guidance to better adapt ecosystems to changing climate, mitigate carbon emissions, respond to climate change impacts across ownership boundaries, and rapidly incorporate science and monitoring information into CNNF management activities. Scheduled for completion in October 2010, the framework will also be a living document, and will be updated as more is learned about forest management in the face of climate change (look for them coming up on the NIACS web site). A series of additional efforts will work to extend the ideas in the framework to all of the northern Wisconsin landscape and beyond. First, the lessons learned during the creation of the framework and its components will be assembled and conveyed to other national forests and land managers. Additionally, the Shared Landscapes Initiative is currently working to develop a parallel framework that will serve the wide variety of forest landowners in northern Wisconsin and complement the CNNF project. Last but not least, organizations including the Trust for Public Land are actively working with the Forest Service and other partners to broaden this effort to an even larger landscape and respond to climate change in forests across all of the northern Lake States U.S. FOREST SERVICE PROJECT PARTNERS Northern Research Station. Chris Swanston, research ecologist and NIACS director (Houghton, MI); Richard Birdsey, program manager, Climate, Fire, and Carbon Cycle Sciences (Newtown Square, PA); and Louis Iverson, landscape ecologist (Delaware, OH). Maria Janowiak, NIACS Eastern Region. Tom Doane, deputy director, AWSLME, Eastern Regional Office (Milwaukee, WI). Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest. Tony Erba, acting forest supervisor (Rhinelander, WI); Linda Parker, ecologist (Park Falls, WI); Matt St. Pierre, wildlife biologist, Geoff Chandler, ecosystems program manager, and Suzanne Flory, public affairs officer (Rhinelander, WI); and Connie Chaney, district ranger, Great Divide Ranger District (Hayward, WI). Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. Barbara Tormoehlen, group leader, Office of Knowledge Management (Newtown Square, PA); Sarah Hines, ecosystem services and markets specialist (Newtown Square, PA); and Gina Childs (St. Paul, MN). Northern Institute of Applied Carbon Science. Maria Janowiak, scientist, climate change adaptation and carbon management, Leslie Brandt, Presidential Management Fellow/ climate change specialist, and Patricia Butler, climate change outreach specialist (Houghton, MI). University of Wisconsin Madison. David Mladenoff, Beers- Bascom Professor of Conservation, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. Additional Collaborators. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts. 4 The development of the Climate Change Response Framework for the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest draws upon the expertise and cooperation of a number of organizations and partners. Standing left to right: Sarah Hines, Geoff Chandler, Maria Janowiak, Linda Parker, Patricia Butler, Chris Swanston, David Mladenoff, Louis Iverson, Richard Birdsey, Barbara Tormoehlen. Front row: Tony Erba, Leslie Brandt. The Forest Service focus on restoration will be closely tied to landscape-scale conservation. Especially in an era of climate change, we need to restore the resilience of America's forests to disturbances of all kinds. The treatments needed will improve watershed health, increase water quality, build community prosperity, and meet our shared vision of healthy sustainable forests. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell

EXPECTED CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS IN NORTHERN WISCONSIN Climate change will have a number of effects on northern Wisconsin. The degree to which these changes occur is related to the amount of greenhouse gases that are emitted by human activities, and higher levels of these emissions will generally result in more dramatic changes to the climate and to ecosystems. Both high and low emissions scenarios have been used to describe some of these potential changes. Mean annual temperatures in northern Wisconsin are expected to increase by an average of about 10.5 F (5.8 C) over the next century under high emissions and by about 6.5 F (3.6 C) under lower emissions. Temperatures are expected to increase more in winter than in summer. Growing seasons will become longer. Although more precipitation is predicted annually, much of the increase is expected to occur during the winter. Precipitation may decrease during the summer and occur in more intense events. These changing precipitation patterns may interact with warmer temperatures to increase the likelihood of drought. The number of storms and extreme weather events is projected to increase. Pests and diseases may increase or become more severe as warmer temperatures allow for faster rates of insect development or allow southern species to survive the winter. Suitable habitat for many tree species will move northward. Warmer temperatures will be more favorable to trees that are located at the northern edge of their range and less favorable to those at the southern edge. Some evidence of this change is already being observed in the region and this pattern is predicted to continue. Interactions of many of these stressors are likely to have a negative effect on forest ecosystems. Many of the projected changes, such as increases in drought, storms, pests, and diseases, will increase stress on forests. The sustainable management of forest ecosystems will continue to be very important in the future. It is likely that more effort and resources will be needed to face the complex challenges caused by climate change. REFERENCES AND RESOURCES Websites: U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station: www.nrs.fs.fed.us Climate Change Atlas: www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas/ Climate, Fire, and Carbon Cycle Sciences: www.nrs.fs.fed.us/units/climate/ Northern Institute of Applied Carbon Science: www.nrs.fs.fed.us/niacs/ Climate Change Response Framework: www.nrs.fs.fed.us/niacs/tools/ccrf/ Forest Management for an Uncertain Climate Future, Tools and Training: www.nrs.fs.fed.us/niacs/tools/uncertainclimate/ U.S. Forest Service, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest: www.fs.fed.us/r9/cnnf/ U.S. Forest Service, Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry: www.na.fs.fed.us/ U.S. Forest Service, Climate Change Resources Center: www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/ Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts: www.wicci.wisc.edu/ References: Hines, Sarah J.; Heath, Linda S.; Birdsey, Richard A. 2010. An annotated bibliography of scientifi c literature on managing forests for carbon benefi ts. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-57. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 49 p. [Includes CD-ROM]. Iverson, Louis R.; Prasad, Anantha M.; Matthews, Stephen N.; Peters, Matthew. 2008. Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. Forest Ecology and Management. 254: 390-406. Iverson, Louis R.; Schwartz, M.W.; Prasad, Anantha M. 2004. How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 13: 209-219. 5

359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015 Contact the Northern Research Station www.nrs.fs.fed.us Michael T. Rains Station Director 11 Campus Boulevard #200 Newtown Square, PA 19073 610-577-4017 mrains@fs.fed.us Rebecca G. Nisley Newsletter Editor 203-230-4338 rnisley@fs.fed.us For additional copies or to be put on the mailing list, email nrspubs@fs.fed.us or call 740-368-0123. NRS Research Review is published quarterly by the Communications and Science Delivery Group of the Northern Research Station (NRS), U.S. Forest Service. As part of the nation s largest forestry research organization, NRS serves 20 states in the Northeast and Midwest and beyond, providing the latest research on current problems and issues affecting forests and the people who depend on them. Our research themes are (1) Forest Disturbance Processes, (2) Urban Natural Resources Stewardship, (3) Sustaining Forests, (4) Providing Clean Air and Water, and (5) Natural Resources Inventory and Monitoring. There are 135 NRS scientists working at 20 field offices, 24 experimental forests, and universities located across 20 states, from Maine to Maryland, Missouri to Minnesota. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.