STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

Similar documents
MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

Remediation Progress at California LUFT Sites: Insights from the GeoTracker Database

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

Making Better Decisions: Real-Time Data Collection and Interpretation

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

Limited Remedial Action Reference Documentation For Site Professionals

The Transport of MTBE through Groundwater in the Bootheel, an Alluvial Setting

AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite fax Beltsville, MD 20705

Site Investigation of Ground Water

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Groundwater Risk Assessment

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

BACKGROUND OFFSITE FACILITIES/RELEASE CASES

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore Maryland

August Prepared by:

Best management practices for vapor investigation and building mitigation decisions

GUIDE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF REMEDIAL ACTION WORKPLANS

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Mary Ann Parcher ES&T, a Division of GES

Examples of Data Collection Strategies and Methods

Empirical Data to Evaluate the Occurrence of Sub-slab O 2 Depletion Shadow at Petroleum Hydrocarbon- Impacted Vapor Intrusion Sites

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites. Bud Ivey Ivey International

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Corrective action design and implementation Petroleum Remediation Program

Endpoint Selection Standard. Saskatchewan Environmental Code

Fractured Bedrock Pump-and-Treat Conversion to In Situ Bioremediation

Patrick N. Agostino, Victor T. Jones, III, and Rufus J. LeBlanc Jr.

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

Draft Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Information Paper. Michael Lowry, RTI International Matthew Young, EPA OUST

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE)

Vapor Encroachment Screening Under the Newly-Revised ASTM E Standard

U.S. EPA s Vapor Intrusion Database: Preliminary Evaluation of Attenuation Factors

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

ALBERTA TIER 1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION GUIDELINES

Groundwater. Groundwater Movement. Groundwater Movement Recharge: the infiltration of water into any subsurface formation.

Passive Gas Environmental Site Assessment and Monitoring

In-Situ Containment and Treatment of a Free Phase Hydrocarbon Plume beneath Plant Infrastructure

EFFECTIVE CLEANUP AT LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND APPROACHES

(,,,) = ( )exp ( + C(x,y,z,t) = the concentration of the contaminant at location x, y, z from the source at time t.

Atlantic RBCA Guidance for Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Monitoring Assessments: Overview. December 7 th, 2006 Moncton, New Brunswick

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

Exclusion Distance Criteria for Assessing Potential Vapour Intrusion at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites

Groundwater modelling to help diagnose contamination problems

ESTCP Cost and Performance Report (ER-0320)

EPA Internet Seminar

February 23, 2010 Version 0.0

NJDEP Vapor Intrusion Guidance

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Soil Vapor Extraction Subsurface Performance Checklist

James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes. REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

(this cover page left intentionally blank)

Aquifer Science Staff, January 2007

Phytoremediation Technology Evaluation and Preliminary Design

75C Calcium Peroxide

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup

Design of a passive hydraulic containment system using FEFLOW modelling

DRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan Guide

FDEP Site Priority Scoring Guidance

Using Mass Balance to Assist in Determining Remedial Options. Stephen Thomson URS New Zealand Limited

APPLICATION OF SUBSURFACE VAPOUR ASSESSMENT AT HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SITES

Technical Protocol for Evaluating the Natural Attenuation of MtBE Regulatory and Scientific Affairs Department

A Comparison of BioVapor and Johnson and Ettinger Model Predictions to Field Data for Multiple Sites

Environmental Site Assessment for Limited Remediation Protocol

Well Hydraulics. The time required to reach steady state depends on S(torativity) T(ransmissivity) BC(boundary conditions) and Q(pumping rate).

MNA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION: FATE &TRANSPORT MODELING BASED APPROACH

PermeOx. Plus. Enhanced Aerobic Biodegradation

Interpreting Analytical Results

Bioremediation: Case Studies in Central Alberta

Closed Castner Firing Range Remedial Investigation. Technical Project Planning (TPP) Meeting #4 07 November :00 AM 11:00 AM

Updated Massachusetts Indoor Air Quality Threshold Values: A Case Study

Hilmar Cheese Company, Hilmar, Merced County, California. On behalf of Hilmar Cheese Company (HCC), Jacobson James & Associates, Inc.

EPA S 2015 vapor intrusion guides What do they mean for your facility?

MEMO. Kris Hinskey

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

Contaminant Degradation and Forensics Using Compound Specific Isotope Analysis

Use Of High Concentration Magnesium Sulfate Solution To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

ADVISORY OPINION IMPACT OF CREC FACILITY ON WATER SUPPLY & USE IN DISTRICT & WELL REMEDIATION DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone using ZVI-Clay Treatment Technology

Steve Mailath, M.Sc., P.Geol. April 10, 2014 WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

CHAPTER IV METHODS FOR EVALUATING RECOVERABILITY OF FREE PRODUCT

Potential effects evaluation of dewatering an underground mine on surface water and groundwater located in a rural area

ROUX ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Consulting & Management

4.0 Groundwater Modeling

Kentucky and Beyond BOS 200 Success Story. The RPI Group Approach to In-situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation

East Maui Watershed Partnership Adapted from Utah State University and University of Wisconsin Ground Water Project Ages 7 th -Adult

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY GROUND WATER HYDRAULICS

Karst Spring: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

ATTACHMENT 12: CDISCO Description and Sensitivity to Input Parameters

Atlantic RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) for Petroleum Impacted Sites in Atlantic Canada. Version 3. User Guidance

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Have You Caught a Case of the Vapors?

S. Rhee, S. Cho & J. Park School of Civil, Urban and Geosystem Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea. Abstract.

Discharge Lake/Wetland: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

Excavation of petroleum-contaminated soil and tank removal sampling Petroleum Remediation Program

Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011)

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Transcription:

AUGUST 2000 NO. 11 STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE ERIC M. NICHOLS, LFR LEVINE!FRICKE; MURRAY D. EINARSON, CONOR PACIFIC/EFW; STEVEN C. BEADLE, LFR LEVINE!FRICKE A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH RESULTS FROM API S SOIL & GROUNDWATER TECHNICAL TASK FORCE The American Petroleum Institute (API) has developed guidelines for evaluating subsurface releases of gasoline containing methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) or other oxygenated fuel additives. These guidelines are presented in API Publication 4699, Strategies for Characterizing Subsurface Releases of MTBE (Nichols et al., 2000), and are briefly outlined in this research bulletin. API Publication 4699 applies the principles of risk-informed decision making to the evaluation of MTBE-affected sites; in other words, it adds exposure and risk considerations to the traditional components of the corrective action process. The risk factors at a given site are evaluated through a Conceptual Site Model, which is an inventory of all known or potential oxygenate sources, pathways, and receptors. Based on these risk factors, three levels of assessment are defined: standard, limited, and detailed. The appropriate level of assessment is initially determined based on receptor data, which can typically be obtained from a survey of nearby wells and land uses. A subsurface investigation may then be conducted to obtain information on sources and pathways. The level of assessment can be upgraded or downgraded as warranted by the resulting source and pathway information. API Publication 4699 includes a review of the chemical properties and subsurface behavior of MTBE and other oxygenated fuel additives. It also provides an overview of characterization and monitoring issues at oxygenate release sites, as well as a detailed review of the tools and techniques used for subsurface assessment. The expedited site assessment process and the use of modern direct-push tools are particularly emphasized, since these approaches are especially well-suited for use at MTBE-affected sites. The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act Amendments mandated the use of cleaner burning gasoline in metropolitan areas throughout the United States. One effect of this legislation was an increase in the use of oxygenated compounds in gasoline, particularly methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), to reduce motor vehicle emissions and improve air quality. During the 1990s, MTBE was used more commonly in gasoline, and at higher, than in previous decades. As oxygenate usage has grown, however, so have concerns regarding the potential impacts of these compounds on soil and groundwater quality. Traditionally, the greatest concerns associated with gasoline releases have been non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) and dissolved-phase benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX). The assessment techniques commonly used by industry were originally developed to meet regulatory requirements for NAPL and BTEX characterization. However, many fuel oxygenates are more mobile and persistent in groundwater than BTEX or other petroleum hydrocarbons. MTBE in particular has a relatively strong affinity for water (Figure 1), and biodegrades more slowly than BTEX.

Table 1. Example Conditions Associated With Different Levels of Assessment Level of Assessment Detailed Standard Limited Receptor Conditions Local usage of shallow groundwater Used for potable purposes Little or no current use for potable purposes Not currently used for potable purposes due to insufficient yield or quality Local usage of affected groundwater Used for potable purposes Not currently used for potable purposes Not currently used for potable purposes Horizontal/vertical separation between affected soil/groundwater and potable-use wells Little or no separation Moderate degree of separation High degree of separation Pathway Conditions Estimated rate of groundwater migration High Moderate Low Presence of groundwater recharge area Site is located in a groundwater recharge area Site is not located in a groundwater recharge area Site is not located in a groundwater recharge area Estimated rate of groundwater recharge High Moderate Low Discharges of groundwater to surface water Groundwater from the site discharges to surface water close to the site Groundwater from the site does not discharge to surface water, or discharges at a moderate distance from the site Groundwater from the site does not discharge to surface water, or discharges at a large distance from the site Downward vertical gradients due to pumping or diffuse recharge Known to occur Existence uncertain Not known to occur Source Conditions Presence/extent of oxygenate release Sampling data suggest that a significant oxygenate release has occurred Sampling data suggest that an oxygenate release has occurred Sampling data suggest that no release has occurred Oxygenate in soil/groundwater high oxygenate moderate oxygenate low oxygenate Extent of affected soil/groundwater large extent of affected soil/groundwater moderate extent of affected soil/groundwater very limited extent of affected soil/groundwater 3. Conduct a subsurface investigation to obtain source and pathway data. The initial level of effort should follow the determination made in Step 2. The CSM should be verified and updated using all available data as characterization proceeds. Specific source and pathway characterization tasks are listed in Tables 3 and 4. 4. If warranted by the source and pathway data, revise the initial level of assessment. If the source and pathway data show that the potential for risk is higher or lower than previously assumed, then the level of assessment should be revised upward or downward accordingly. 3

5. Continue assessment and monitoring until sufficient information has been collected to verify the validity of the CSM and to Make an acceptable interim or final remedy decision. Specific monitoring tasks are listed in Table 4. PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT OF MTBE RELEASES API Publication 4699 reviews the chemical properties and subsurface behavior of MTBE and other oxygenated fuel additives. It also discusses the practical issues Table 2. Receptor Identification Tasks Perform well survey for domestic wells within a minimum 0.25-mile radius of the release, and for municipal wells within a minimum 0.5-miles radius. Collect relevant information on current and future water usage from local or regional water management authorities, state water agencies, water utilities, or municipalities. Review state and local laws, regulations, and policies to determine groundwater classifications, specific actions, or compliance goals applicable to the site. Consider relevant ecological receptors and habitats. 4

Table 3. Pathway Characterization Tasks Investigation Tasks Level of Assessment Detailed Standard Limited a. Flow System Characterization Review regional information; develop conceptual model of Review regional information; develop conceptual model of Review regional information; develop conceptual model of flow system between site and flow system between site and flow system between site and groundwater receptor(s) groundwater receptor(s) groundwater receptor(s) Define horizontal and vertical Define horizontal flow system Define horizontal flow system flow system (potentiometric (potentiometric contours) (potentiometric contours) contours) Evaluate vertical flow Similar in detail to historical Evaluate vertical flow potential (use regional or site- BTEX investigation potential (use site-specific specific water level water level measurements to measurements to evaluate estimate vertical hydraulic vertical gradients) gradients) May include hydraulic tests Assess hydraulic and assessment of vertical communication between hydraulic communication source and receptor wells Pathway Characterization Estimate horizontal and vertical migration rates If refined estimates of migration rates are needed, perform hydraulic tests If refined estimates of potential for migration to receptor are needed, conduct simulations of groundwater flow, including the effects of expected groundwater pumping b. Geologic Characterization Define geological controls on groundwater movement, and Define geological controls on groundwater movement, and Define geological controls on groundwater movement the location and integrity of the location and integrity of between a release and confining units between a confining units between a potential receptor wells release and existing receptor wells release and potential receptor wells Collect and interpret geologic data using conventional well Generate detailed geologic Generate geologic cross- logs or other lower-resolution cross-sections using high- sections with limited use of methods resolution characterization high-resolution methods, such as CPT or characterization methods geophysical logging Practical Assessment of MTBE Releases 5

Table 3. Pathway Characterization Tasks (continued) Investigation Tasks Level of Assessment Detailed Standard Limited c. Plume Delineation Define the horizontal and vertical extent of oxygenate Define the horizontal extent of oxygenate plume Define the horizontal extent of oxygenate plume plume Limited delineation of the May include some vertical Extensive use depth-discrete vertical extent of oxygenate delineation soil and groundwater plume sampling methods for vertical May use depth-discrete soil Pathway Characterization d. Potential Conduit Survey and horizontal delineation Summarize extent using isoconcentration contour maps, plume cross sections Extensive: identify the location and details of May use depth-discrete soil and groundwater sampling methods for horizontal and vertical delineation Summarize extent using isoconcentration contour maps Less extensive and groundwater sampling methods for horizontal and vertical delineation Level of detail similar to historical BTEX investigation Minimal abandoned water wells, cathodic protection wells, dry wells, sewers, utility lines, etc. that could facilitate migration to receptors specifically associated with MTBE-affected sites, such as the following: Receptor characterization, including surveys of local wells, surface-water bodies, ecological receptors, and present and future land uses. Pathway characterization, including assessment of geology, flow systems (e.g., Figure 3), plume boundaries, plume stability, and artificial conduits. Source characterization, including evaluation of source zones, source depletion, oxygenate vapors, and oxygenated fuel NAPL. MTBE vs. BTEX characterization, including source differences, plume geometry differences, relative biodegradability, and sample media biases. API Publication 4699 includes a review of the tools and techniques used for subsurface assessment at MTBEaffected sites. It particularly emphasizes expedited site assessment techniques and modern direct-push sampling tools, as these are especially well-suited for use at MTBE affected sites. A variety of innovative technologies, including surface geophysical surveys, active and passive soil gas sampling tools, direct-push soil 6

Table 4. Source Characterization Tasks and Verification Monitoring Tasks Investigation Tasks Source Zone Delineation Level of Assessment Detailed Standard Limited Review existing information Review existing information Review existing information concerning the suspected concerning the suspected concerning the suspected release release release If downward gradient exists If strong downward gradient No additional intrusive and/or supply wells are within and/or other conduits exist, investigation of source zone Source Characterization ½- mile, perform an intrusive investigation to further delineate the source zone Sample any NAPL encountered to assess the fraction of oxygenate remaining in the NAPL If source treatment (including perform a limited intrusive investigation to further delineate the source zone required if other tasks confirm low risk status removal) is warranted, define the horizontal and vertical extent of free-phase and/or residual NAPL containing oxygenate a. Groundwater and Chemical Monitoring Minimum of two seasonal variations in water levels and Minimum of two seasonal variations in water levels and Minimum of two seasonal variations in water levels and Multiple monitoring wells May use one or more Traditional monitoring well with short screened intervals, monitoring wells with short network, installed in affected installed in affected and screened intervals, installed in zones unaffected zones affected zones Verification Monitoring b. Assess Source Depletion and Hydraulic Influences Potentiometric contour maps (horizontal and vertical) Isoconcentration contour maps Plot concentration versus time for individual wells to assess source depletion and hydraulic influences Potentiometric contour maps (horizontal and possibly vertical) Isoconcentration contour maps Plot concentration versus time for individual wells to assess source depletion and hydraulic influences Plot concentration versus time for individual wells to assess source depletion and hydraulic influences c. Assess Plume Stability Plots of concentration versus distance for centerline wells Plots of concentration versus distance for centerline wells Plots of concentration versus distance for centerline wells over multiple time periods over multiple time periods over multiple time periods 7

sampling tools, well points, sealed-screen samplers, vertical profilers, single-interval and multi-level monitoring wells, cone penetrometers, and other specialized instruments are discussed and ranked based on their suitability for different assessment tasks. MORE API SOIL & GROUNDWATER RESEARCH BULLETINS Simulation of Transport of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) to Groundwater from Small-Volume Releases of Gasoline in the Vadose Zone, June 2000 Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) Mobility Limits in Soil, June 2000 Pumping piezometric surface Water table LUST Supply Well Characteristics of Dissolved Petroleum Hydrocarbon Plumes Results From Four Studies, December 1998 DAFfy Graphs: An Innovative Approach for Modeling the Soil to Groundwater Pathway, August 1998 Evaluation of Sampling and Analytical Methods for Measuring Indicators of Intrinsic Bioremediation, February 1998 Selective Subcritical Water Extraction of Aromatic and Aliphatic Organic Pollutants from Petroleum Industry Soils and Sludges, July 1998 Ten Frequently Asked Questions About MTBE in Water, March 1998 Estimation of Infiltration and Recharge for Environmental Site Assessment, March 1997 Figure 3: MTBE Plume Migrating Through a Leaky Aquitard Summary of Processes, Human Exposures and Remediation Technologies Applicable to Low Permeability Soils, September 1996 API Publication 4699: Strategies for Characterizing Subsurface Releases of Gasoline Containing MTBE by E.M. Nichols, M.D. Einarson, & S.C. Beadle Published February 2000 Available from API by free download at www.api.org/mtbe For more Environment, Health, and Safety research information, visit the API EHS web site: www.api.org/ehs 8