Table 1: Nutrient Unit Livestock Information. Summary of Revisions to Table 1 of the Nutrient Management Tables

Similar documents
Manure Production and Management Record Keeping Forms

Standard Animal Weights

MINIMUM DISTANCE SEPARATION (MDS 1) GUIDE FOR NEW NON-AGRICULTURAL USES ADJACENT TO EXISTING LIVESTOCK

Agronomy Facts 54 Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38): Who Is Affected?

Horses, donkeys and ducks: identifying key trends in other livestock and poultry

Pennsylvania s Nutrient Management Act (Act 38):

National standards for nutrient contents in manure

Natural fertiliser control and application system in Poland state of the art. The natural manure composition in Poland estimating and verification

SEVERANCE PROPOSAL FORM

Manure Management. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management. June 2, Jarrod O. Miller, Ph.D. Extension Educator, Agriculture

Municipalities and the Agricultural Operation Practices Act (AOPA)


No-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management

Organic Manures and Fertilizers for Vegetable Crops

Skills, Competencies and Knowledge

Nitrogen Availability from Manipulated Manures

Nova Scotia Premises Identification Program

DEP Manure Management Manual COMPLETING A MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN PART 3

dairy cattle, Breed Tell their principal uses and merits. Tell where the breeds originated.

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, From: G. Albrecht P. Ristow

ANIMAL SCIENCE Merit Badge Requirements

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION BOARD

Iowa Animal Identification Program

Farm registration and movement of farm livestock

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

ANIMAL SCIENCE II (123)

Value of Poultry Manure Nutrients for Crop Production. Antonio Mallarino and John Sawyer Department of Agronomy

Issues in the Animal Agriculture Industry A. Animal Welfare- the humane treatment of animals. 1. Most animal producers and researchers believe in

Digestate - Maximizing its Value and Use

AgriStability Agri-Québec Plus

Chapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives

Manure Management Guidelines

BENEFITS OF COMPOSTED MANURE

ANIMAL DOMESTICATION

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Calculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth

Environmental Hazard in South Dakota?

Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Capturing Manure s Value. March 2008

Revised Estimated Returns Series Beginning in 2007

Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada

Bulletin 604 OHIO LIVESTOCK MANURE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Using Compost and Animal Manure as a Florida BMP on Vegetable Production. Monica Ozores-Hampton, Ph.D.

Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content

Animal Protein Production Impacts and Trends Dr. Judith L. Capper

Mortality Compost Nutrients and Use On Farm, Ways to Enhance Nutrient Content

Animal Science Merit Badge Workbook

AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION AND AUTOMATION Vol. II - Animal Solid Manure: Storage, Handling and Disposal - José R. Bicudo

MANITOBA CONSERVATION USE OF A CENTRIFUGE FOR LIQUID/SOLID MANURE SEPARATION

RESOLUTION # 5 LIVESTOCK IN NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURE

Manure Management. PEI Department of Agriculture & Forestry

COMPONENTS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT

Telephone (609) / Facsimile (609)

Business mailing address (include civic number and road name) City/Town Province Postal code

Livestock Farm Uses of Switchgrass and Miscanthus

Manure Spreader Calibration

How High Fuel, Fertilizer and Commodity Prices Affect Manure Management Decisions

Intensive Livestock Farming: Does Farm Size Matter?

Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017

Changes in Manure Nutrient Credits John Peters and Keith Kelling

Emerging Ethanol Industry: Implications for Animal Manure Management

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

Institute of Ag Professionals

Introduction. Objective: Livestock operations Current trend is towards large confined operations

Tech Manual Update Bulletin

Advanced Composting for Beginners

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

Animal numbers in New Zealand Revised 2004 Agricultural sector calculations: emissions from domestic livestock and agricultural soils

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

WHOLE FARM NUTRIENT BALANCE CALCULATOR TUTORIAL WORKBOOK-TEACHING GUIDE

Transboundary pollution generated by industrial animal production in the Baltic Sea Region

Mineralization of Nitrogen from Compost

LIVESTOCK, POULTRY, LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY PRODUCTS

Livestock Enterprise. Budgets for Iowa 2017 File B1-21. Ag Decision Maker

VOC CO 2 CH 4 N 2O. Viable particles. Increasing diversity. Broilers. Pigs. Cattle. Each source type may be outside barn to varying degrees.

CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE PROFILE 2011

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Production of ohne Gentechnik Food Facility Description Agriculture animal products

Introduction BEEF 140

Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Irish Agriculture:

J.A. Lory 1, R.E. Massey 2 and M.C. Shannon 3 1

Nutrient management on organic cattle farms

Value of Manure as a Fertilizer. What s so good about manure? Typical Nutrient Concentration

FERTILIZERS, MANURE, OR BIOSOLIDS?

Do not oven-dry the soil

PANEL: Making a resource into the right source

Should I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm?

Objectives. Management Approaches. Mortality Compost Nutrients and Use On Farm, Ways to Enhance Nutrient Content

costs and returns guide for hogs in virginia

Census of Agriculture Form 2014/2015

Manitoba Pig and Pork Industry

Record Book NM Ron Wiederholt NDSU Extension nutrient management specialist Teresa Dvorak Livestock Nutrient Management Specialist

Statistics for Manitoba Pig Industry

ORGANIC VEGETABLE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Manure Storage Sealing

Water Quality in~eorgia Georgia s Agricultural Waste Regulations

FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 25, 2012

From City to Farm: Greenbin-derived Compost Agricultural Trials. Compost Council of Canada Workshop January 22, 2013

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville

Transcription:

New Changes to Table 1 and Updated Table of the Nutrient Management Tables for Ontario Regulation 67/03 made under the Nutrient Management Act, 00 Table 1: Nutrient Unit Livestock Information Summary of Revisions to Table 1 of the Nutrient Management Tables 1

Type Sub Type Sub- Sub Type Average Weight Utilization (kg) (%) Liquid Amount (m 3 /1000 kg/day) Liquid DM* (%) Solid Amount (m 3 /1000 kg/day) Solid DM* (%) Nutrient Units (animal /NU) Livestock Housing Capacity (m /animal) Chickens Laying Hens New Sub- Sub Type: Floor Run 1.70 96 - - 0.0749 60 150 0.093 Dairy Dairy Milking Age Cows Large Frame Milking Age Cows Small Frame (Jersey Size) All Sub- Sub Types Pack Scrape Old: 635 New: 658 Old: 0.85 New: 1 Mink Breeding Females (including rep/market animals/males) N/A Old:1.81 New:1.5 Old:No Value New:1.7136 Old: No Value New:.1 Old: 0.149 New:0.536 Old: 36 New:35 Old: 90 New: 60 Turkeys Breeder Toms N/A Old:No Value New: 45 Turkeys Turkey Breeder Layers N/A Old: No Value New: 67 Swine Feeders Full Slats Swine Feeders Full Slats Wet/dry Feeder Swine Feeders Partial Slats Swine Feeders Partial Slats Wet/Dry feeder Swine Feeders Solid scrape Old: 5. kg New:61.4 kg Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old: 6.0 New:5.5 Old: 6.0 New:5.5 Old:6.0 New:5.5 Old: 6.0 New:5.5 Old: 6.0 New:5.5 Old: 0.836 New: 0.957 Old:0.836 New:0.957 Old:0.99 New:1.064 Old:0.99 New:1.064 Old:1.11 New:1.78

Swine Feeders Solid Scrape Wet/dry feeder Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old: 6.0 New:5.5 Old:1.11 New:1.78 Swine Feeders Deep bedded Old: 5. kg New: 61.4 kg Old:6.0 New:5.5 Old:1.30 New:1.490 Swine Swine Weaners Weaners Non- SEW Non-SEW Wet/dry feeder Old: 15.9 kg New: 13.3 kg Old: 15.9 kg New: 13.3 kg 3

Table - Manure Databank Manure Databank Taken From NMAN3 Program January 015 Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types The nutrients from manure have a nutrient and economic value. The tables that follow give an indication of the available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from various livestock types. The information is based on the most Old databank of nutrients and makes a few assumptions. All information in the tables is presented in an as-is basis, in other words, the nutrients as applied at the listed dry matter content. The useable nitrogen is the amount of nitrogen available in the year of application, assuming the manure is spring applied and incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified, quick-estimate method for calculating nitrogen available for fall applications would be: Multiply half the % total nitrogen by 10 to calculate kg/1,000 L (same as kg/m 3 ) or kg/tonne. The actual value will vary (especially for liquid manure) with late summer application (lower availability) versus late fall application (higher availability). The amount of phosphorus and potash does not vary with season of application. In the year of application, 40% of the phosphorus in manure is available; another 40% is available in subsequent years. The actual immediate nutrient value for crop production will be less than what is reflected in the tables if the nutrients being applied are not required for the production of the crop. An example of this would be the nitrogen from manure applied to a legume crop, or the phosphorus and/or potassium applied to a field with a soil test higher than 60 mg/l (ppm) or 50 mg/l (ppm) for P and K, respectively. Some nitrogen is available in subsequent years; the amount is higher for solid manure than for liquid manure. The value of that nitrogen for the 3 years is reflected in the column that reads Year 4 value, which also reflects the remaining half of the total available phosphorus value. The values in these tables were compiled by OMAFRA, with aggregate sample data provided by A&L Labs, SRG (Agri-Food Labs), Stratford Agri-Analysis and the University of Guelph Analytical Lab, and summarize the information found in the NMAN3 software. The manure value is based on the purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (October 013). The micronutrient and the organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. 4

Table A1. Liquid Manure Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Metric Animal Type DM Range Available Nutrients (in year of application) Aver Usable DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 Hog average 3.6.4 1.10.05 Year 1 value Value Yr 4 value Total N Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) NH 4-N P K % kg/m 3 $/ m 3 % ppm % % % 6.30 1.80 # Samples 0.39,645 0.6 0.1 0.19,0 10% 18% 1.1 4.15 3.04 3.56 6% 10% 7.6 3.56.1 3.13 4% 6% 4.9.95 1.47.59 % 4%.9.13 1.01 1.84 0% % 1. 1.34 0.37 1.30 finisher 4.9 3.0 1.38.9 weaners.3 1.58 0.83 1.6 Sow (SEW) 1.7 1.45 0.55 1.19 dry sows 1.9 1.81 0.9 1.19 Farrow to Finish 3.8.48 0.9.7 Sow to weaner. 1.53 0.74 1.30 Dairy average 8.6 1.66 0.83.70 10% 18% 14.1.04 1.9 3.35 8% 10% 8.9 1.90 0.83.9 6% 8% 7.1 1.65 0.64.59 % 6% 4.4 1.16 0.37.05 0% % 1.1 0.56 0.18 1.19 Beef average 8.6 1.59 0.74.48 10% 18% 14.4.00 1.0 3.56 6% 10% 7.9.00 0.83.38 % 6% 3.9 1.13 0.46 1.6 0% % 1.1 0.41 0.18 0.97 1.90 4.80 10.50 3.40 8.30.40 5.90 1.60 3.50 0.60 8.60.0 4.70 1.30 3.80 0.90 4.70 1.30 6.60 1.50 4.0 1.0 5.80 1.60 7.60.50 6.40 1.60 5.50 1.30 4.00 0.80.10 0.40 5.40 1.50 7.60.40 6.00 1.60 3.60 0.90 1.70 0.30 0.80 4,631 0.46 0.33 0.33 73 0.65 4,116 0.41 0.3 0.9 95 0.53 3,444 0.34 0.16 0.4 357 0.37,535 0.5 0.11 0.17 697 0. 1,634 0.16 0.04 0.1 780 0.5 3,603 0.36 0.15 0.7 458 0.8 1,850 0.19 0.09 0.15 77 0.4 1,763 0.17 0.06 0.11 37 0.7,313 0.3 0.10 0.11 6 0.43,946 0.9 0.10 0.1 119 0.8 1,763 0.18 0.08 0.1 58 0.39 1,601 0.16 0.09 0.5 449 0.53 1,776 0.18 0.14 0.31 74 0.4 1,935 0.19 0.09 0.7 478 0.36 1,691 0.17 0.07 0.4 598 0.5 1,197 0.1 0.04 0.19 53 0.1 576 0.06 0.0 0.11 18 0.37 1,543 0.15 0.08 0.3 154 0.51 1,77 0.18 0.13 0.33 60 0.43,067 0.1 0.09 0. 38 0.4 1,174 0.1 0.05 0.15 38 0.08 451 0.05 0.0 0.09 18 5

Poultry average 10.0 4.94.58 3.4 10% 18% 13.7 5.77 3.50 3.67 6% 10% 8.3 4.9.48 3.13 % 6% 4.1 3.40 1.01.38 pullets 15.3 5.90 3.68 3.67 layers 9.9 4.94.48 3.13 Mink average 3.6.5 0.95 0.97 Runoff 0.7 0.7 0.09 0.97 Milk-fed veal 1.5 0.46 0.18 1.94 Biosolids aerobic.0 0.41 0.55 0 anaerobic 4.4 1.19 1.9 0 13.00 4.00 15.70 5.50 1.70 3.90 8.00 1.60 16.10 5.90 1.70 3.90 5.50 1.70 1.40 0.0.70 0.30 1.30 1.00 3.30.0 0.81 5,567 0.56 0.8 0.30 17 0.97 6,350 0.64 0.38 0.34 87 0.80 5,608 0.56 0.7 0.9 46 0.53 4,06 0.40 0.11 0. 37 1.04 6,187 0.6 0.40 0.34 11 0.81 5,587 0.56 0.7 0.9 81 0.45 605 0.6 0.10 0.09 0.05 310 0.03 0.01 0.09 49 0.08 553 0.06 0.0 0.18 3 0.1 109 0.01 0.06 0 10 0.8 776 0.08 0.14 0 39 1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 100] for liquid manure. Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 1.30 1.35 0.95 $/kg). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. Table A. Liquid Manure Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Imperial Animal Type DM Range Available Nutrients (in year of application) Aver Usable DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 Hog average 3.6.4 10.7 0.6 Year 1 value Value Yr 4 value Total N Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) NH 4-N P K % lbs/1000 gallons $/1000 gallons % ppm % % % 8.80 7.80 # Samples 0.39,645 0.6 0.1 0.19,0 10% 18% 1.1 41.5 30.7 35. 6% 10% 7.6 35.7 1.1 31.5 4% 6% 4.9 9.5 15.1 6. % 4%.9 1.4 9.9 18.8 0% % 1. 13.4 3.5 1.4 finisher 4.9 30. 13.8 9. weaners.3 15.8 8.3 16. Sow (SEW) 1.7 14.5 5.5 11.9 dry sows 1.9 18.1 9. 11.9 Farrow to Finish 3.8 4.8 9..7 58.80.0 47.80 15.30 38.0 11.10 7.00 7.0 15.50.70 39.10 10.00 1.50 6.00 17.0 4.00 1.60 6.00 30.30 7.00 0.80 4,631 0.46 0.33 0.33 73 0.65 4,116 0.41 0.3 0.9 95 0.53 3,444 0.34 0.16 0.4 357 0.37,535 0.5 0.11 0.17 697 0. 1,634 0.16 0.04 0.1 780 0.5 3,603 0.36 0.15 0.7 458 0.8 1,850 0.19 0.09 0.15 77 0.4 1,763 0.17 0.06 0.11 37 0.7,313 0.3 0.10 0.11 6 0.43,946 0.9 0.10 0.1 119 6

Sow to weaner. 15.3 7.4 13.0 Dairy average 8.6 16.6 8.3 7.1 10% 18% 14.1 0.4 1.9 33.6 8% 10% 8.9 19.1 8.3 9.0 6% 8% 7.1 16.5 6.4 6.0 % 6% 4.4 11.6 3.7 0.6 0% % 1.1 5.6 1.8 11.9 Beef average 8.6 15.9 7.4 4.8 10% 18% 14.4 0.0 11.9 35.7 6% 10% 7.9 0.0 8.3 3.8 % 6% 3.9 11.3 4.6 16. 0% % 1.1 4.1 1.8 9.7 Poultry average 10.0 49.4 5.8 3.4 10% 18% 13.7 57.7 35.0 36.7 6% 10% 8.3 49. 4.8 31.3 % 6% 4.1 34.0 10.1 3.8 pullets 15.3 59.0 36.8 36.7 layers 9.9 49.4 4.8 31.3 Mink average 3.6 5. 9.5 9.7 Runoff 0.7.7 0.9 9.7 Milk-fed veal 1.5 4.7 1.8 19.4 Biosolids aerobic.0 4.1 5.5 0 anaerobic 4.4 11.9 1.9 0 19.30 5.60 6.70 7.40 34.60 11.50 9.00 7.40 5.00 5.90 18.10 3.60 9.60 1.70 4.70 6.70 34.60 10.70 7.30 7.30 16.60 4.10 7.70 1.50 59.30 18.30 71.80 4.80 58.10 17.60 36.80 7.50 73.60 6.70 58.0 17.70 5.10 7.70 6.30 0.70 1.30 1.30 5.80 4.50 15.00 9.90 0.8 1,763 0.18 0.08 0.1 58 0.39 1,601 0.16 0.09 0.5 449 0.53 1,776 0.18 0.14 0.31 74 0.4 1,935 0.19 0.09 0.7 478 0.36 1,691 0.17 0.07 0.4 598 0.5 1,197 0.1 0.04 0.19 53 0.1 576 0.06 0.0 0.11 18 0.37 1,543 0.15 0.08 0.3 154 0.51 1,77 0.18 0.13 0.33 60 0.43,067 0.1 0.09 0. 38 0.4 1,174 0.1 0.05 0.15 38 0.08 451 0.05 0.0 0.09 18 0.81 5,567 0.56 0.8 0.30 17 0.97 6,350 0.64 0.38 0.34 87 0.80 5,608 0.56 0.7 0.9 46 0.53 4,06 0.40 0.11 0. 37 1.04 6,187 0.6 0.40 0.34 11 0.81 5,587 0.56 0.7 0.9 81 0.45 605 0.6 0.10 0.09 0.05 310 0.03 0.01 0.09 49 0.08 553 0.06 0.0 0.18 3 0.1 109 0.01 0.06 0 10 0.8 776 0.08 0.14 0 39 1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 100] for liquid manure. Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 0.60 0.61 0.43 $/lb). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. Table B1. Solid Manure Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Metric Available Nutrients Total Nutrient Content Animal Type DM Range Value (in year of application) (as-is basis) Aver Usable Year 1 Year 4 Total DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 value NH value N 4-N P K % kg/tonne $/Tonne % ppm % % % # Samples 7

Hog average 30.8 3.78 4.51 6.16 18%-30% 3.8 3.88 4.60 5.83 30%-100% 4.5 3.58 4.4 6.70 Dairy average 5.9 1.98 1.84 6.59 30% + 41.0 1.88 1.93 7.13 18% 30% 1..01 1.84 6.48 Beef average 31.4.45 3.04 7.13 40%-60% 45.6 3.54 4.97 9.40 30%-40% 34.5.76 3.40 8.00 18% 30% 4.1 1.86.0 5.94 Sheep average 3..98 3.13 8.1 Dairy goats average 35.7 3.5.58 11.1 16.90 7.50 16.80 7.50 17.00 7.50 11.30 3.70 11.80 4.0 11.30 3.70 14.10 5.70 0.0 9.10 15.80 6.40 10.80 4.00 15.90 5.50 18.30 5.0 0.93,913 0.9 0.49 0.57 80 0.9 3,154 0.3 0.50 0.54 55 0.93,511 0.5 0.48 0.6 5 0.7 1,505 0.15 0.0 0.61 364 0.8 1,075 0.11 0.1 0.66 86 0.69 1,617 0.16 0.0 0.60 78 0.9 1,778 0.18 0.33 0.66 781 1.34 545 0.5 0.54 0.87 157 1.03,0 0.0 0.37 0.74 03 0.70 1,358 0.14 0. 0.55 416 0.87,784 0.8 0.34 0.76 73 1.04,818 0.8 0.8 1.03 45 Composted cattle 38.3.8.58 11.90 18.50 Compost: all types 46.4 3.66 3.13 8.96 17.50 5.30 0.86 6.40 1.09 543 0.05 0.8 1.10 9 877 0.09 0.34 0.83 63 Grain-fed veal average 30.5.04 1.75 5.51 Horses average 37.4 1.0 1.38 4.64 >50% 63.0 0.81 1.93 9.61 <50% 34.6 1.17 1.38 4.10 Poultry average 60.6 10.6 1.1 15.7 80% + 89. 14.8 15.3.1 70% 80% 74.5 11.5 1.4 17.1 60%-70% 65.1 10.3 11.9 16.9 50% 60% 54.9 9.10 14.3 14.9 40%-50% 44.7 9.1 13. 15.1 30%-40% 34.5 8.31 9.9 10.5 18% 30% 4.4 8.50 6.90 7.45 layers 37.3 9.84 9.0 10.6 pullets 4.6 1.7 1.7 15.0 broilers 66.1 1.3 13.0 19.3 broiler breeder growers 6.8 6.96 13.1 13.9 broiler breeder layers 65.1 8.06 14.5 16.9 10.0 3.80 7.80.80 1.80 4.0 7.30.70 45.00 1.10 60.90 9.10 47.90.50 45.50 0.80 45.30 3.0 44.00 1.10 33.30 15.10 7.40 11.0 35.30 15.0 47.90.60 51.900 3.00 39.90 1.0 46.10 3.80 0.79 1,48 0.14 0.19 0.51 16 0.50 749 0.07 0.15 0.43 41 0.80 591 0.06 0.1 0.89 4 0.47 769 0.08 0.15 0.38 37.71 5,501 0.60 1.3 1.45 1,675 4.6 4,458 0.45 1.66.05 59 3.09 4,88 0.49 1.35 1.58 381.66 5,13 0.60 1.9 1.56 334.6 5,149 0.58 1.55 1.38 35.10 6,57 0.63 1.43 1.40 16 1.79 6,53 0.65 1.01 0.97 151 1.64 7,957 0.80 0.75 0.69 189.07 8,063 0.81 1.00 0.98 4 3.19 6,999 0.70 1.38 1.39 78 3.1 6,551 0.66 1.41 1.79 193 1.88,99 0.9 1.4 1.9 6.1 3,175 0.3 1.58 1.56 74 8

Turkeys average 50.4 11.3 1. 15.3 heavy toms 5.3 11.8 1.7 17. heavy hens >8kg 64. 13.5 14.9.0 poults 70.5 1.9 8.8 13. breeders 54.8 10.3 1.0 14.6 broilers 61.8 1.8 11.1 15.3 Biosolids dewatered 3.1 1.8 1.1 1.19 45.70 0.0 48.80 1.00 58.60 6.50 40.50 17.00 43.50 19.10 46.0 1.10 34.10 3.90.53 8,334 0.83 1.33 1.4 104.6 8,675 0.87 1.38 1.59 33 3.5 6,500 0.65 1.6.04 6 3.31 6,585 0.67 0.90 1..16 8,567 0.86 1.30 1.35 1 3.35 6,000 0.60 1.1 1.4 6 3.76 3,443 0.34 1.31 0.11 89 1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 10] for solid manure (metric). Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 1.30 1.35 0.95 $/kg). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. Table B. Solid Manure Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Imperial Available Nutrients Total Nutrient Content Animal Type DM Range Value (in year of application) (as-is basis) Aver Usable Year 1 Year 4 Total DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 value NH value N 4-N P K Hog average 30.8 7.6 9.0 1.3 % lb/ton $/ton % ppm % % % 15.30 6.80 # Samples 0.93,913 0.9 0.49 0.57 80 18%-30% 3.8 7.8 9. 11.7 30%-100% 4.5 6.9 8.8 13.4 Dairy average 5.9 4.0 3.7 13. 30% + 41.0 3.8 3.9 14.3 18% 30% 1. 4.0 3.7 13.0 Beef average 31.4 4.9 6.1 14.3 40%-60% 45.6 7.1 9.9 18.8 30%-40% 34.5 5.5 6.8 16.0 18% 30% 4.1 3.7 4.0 11.9 Sheep average 3. 6.0 6.3 16.4 Dairy goats average 35.7 6.5 5.. 15.30 6.80 15.30 6.80 10.30 3.40 10.80 3.80 10.0 3.30 1.80 5.0 18.40 8.30 14.30 5.80 9.80 3.60 14.50 5.00 16.60 4.70 0.9 3,154 0.3 0.50 0.54 55 0.93,511 0.5 0.48 0.6 5 0.7 1,505 0.15 0.0 0.61 364 0.8 1,075 0.11 0.1 0.66 86 0.69 1,617 0.16 0.0 0.60 78 0.9 1,778 0.18 0.33 0.66 781 1.34 545 0.5 0.54 0.87 157 1.03,0 0.0 0.37 0.74 03 0.70 1,358 0.14 0. 0.55 416 0.87,784 0.8 0.34 0.76 73 1.04,818 0.8 0.8 1.03 45 Composted cattle 38.3 5.6 5. 3.8 16.80 Compost: all types 46.4 7.3 6.3 17.9 15.90 4.80 0.86 5.90 1.09 543 0.05 0.8 1.10 9 877 0.09 0.34 0.83 63 Grain-fed veal average 30.5 4.1 3.5 11.0 Horses average 37.4.4.8 9.3 >50% 63.0 1.6 3.9 19.1 9.30 3.50 7.10.60 11.60 3.90 0.79 1,48 0.14 0.19 0.51 16 0.50 749 0.07 0.15 0.43 41 0.80 591 0.06 0.1 0.89 4 9

<50% 34.6.3.7 8. Poultry average 60.6 1.3 4.3 31.4 80% + 89. 9.7 30.5 44.4 70% 80% 74.5 3.0 4.8 34. 60%-70% 65.1 0.6 3.7 33.8 50% 60% 54.9 18.3 8.5 9.9 40%-50% 44.7 18. 6.3 30. 30%-40% 34.5 16.6 18.7 1.0 18% 30% 4.4 17.0 13.8 14.9 layers 37.3 19.7 18.4 1. pullets 4.6 5.4 5.4 30.0 broilers 66.1 4.6 6.0 38.7 broiler breeder growers 6.8 13.9 6. 7.9 broiler breeder layers 65.1 16.1 9.1 33.7 Turkeys average 50.4.7 4.5 30.7 heavy toms 5.3 3.5 5.3 34.3 heavy hens >8kg 64. 7.0 9.9 44.1 poults 70.5 5.8 16.5 6. breeders 54.8 0.6 3.9 9.1 broilers 61.8 5.5. 30.7 Biosolids dewatered 3.1 5.7 4.1.4 6.60.40 41.10 19.0 55.50 6.40 43.60 0.40 41.40 18.80 41.0 0.90 39.90 19.10 30.40 13.70 5.00 10.10 3.0 13.80 43.60 0.60 47.30 0.90 36.30 19.0 41.90 1.60 41.80 18.40 44.30 19.00 53.40 4.10 36.80 15.50 39.50 17.0 4.00 19.0 31.0 1.70 0.47 769 0.08 0.15 0.38 37.71 5,501 0.60 1.3 1.45 1,675 4.6 4,458 0.45 1.66.05 59 3.09 4,88 0.49 1.35 1.58 381.66 5,13 0.60 1.9 1.56 334.6 5,149 0.58 1.55 1.38 35.10 6,57 0.63 1.43 1.40 16 1.79 6,53 0.65 1.01 0.97 151 1.64 7,957 0.80 0.75 0.69 189.07 8,063 0.81 1.00 0.98 4 3.19 6,999 0.70 1.38 1.39 78 3.1 6,551 0.66 1.41 1.79 193 1.88,99 0.9 1.4 1.9 6.1 3,175 0.3 1.58 1.56 74.53 8,334 0.83 1.33 1.4 104.6 8,675 0.87 1.38 1.59 33 3.5 6,500 0.65 1.6.04 6 3.31 6,585 0.67 0.90 1..16 8,567 0.86 1.30 1.35 1 3.35 6,000 0.60 1.1 1.4 6 3.76 3,443 0.34 1.31 0.11 89 1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 0] for solid manure (imperial). Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 0.60 0.61 0.43 $/lb). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. Table C1. Other Livestock Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Metric Animal Type Available Nutrients (in year of application) Aver Usable DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 Year 1 Value 3 Value Year 4 value Total N Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) NH 4-N P K % Kg/tonne $/tonne % ppm % % % Bison 1.1 0.79 0.64 0.76.60 1.70 # Samples 0.40 30 0.03 0.07 0.07 7 Elk 30.5 1.47 1.84.59 Red deer 5.0 1.4 1.56.16 6.90 4.00 5.80 3.40 0.73 60 0.06 0.0 0.4 13 0.6 514 0.05 0.17 0.0 6 10

White-tailed deer 31.1.38 3.96 3.78 Fallow deer 9.4 1.71 3. 3.78 Llama 34.9 1.46 3..70 Alpaca 7.1 1.51 3.68.48 Wild boar 9.8.11 3.04 3.78 Chinchilla 65.7 3.48 5.70 10.80 Rabbit 45.6.57 8.00 6.16 Fox 35.4 7.59 13.89 4.10 Mink average 45.8 16. 16.7 8.53 kittens 50.0 0.7 17.6 9.50 adults 44. 1.8.4 11.8 composted carcasses 45.9.89 5.15.81 females & kits 41.7 19.9 18.9 9.7 Pheasants 66.3 8.17 7.45 8.96 Partridge 71.9 14.1 11.7 1.3 Quail 59.6 16.4 9.94 11.6 Squab (pigeon) 57.7 11.9 8.65 1.3 Duck 39.7 4.17 3.50 4.86 Ostrich 40.8.3 4.97 3.56 Emu 5.9 4.16.67 3.46 Rhea 8.7 3.35 4.97 3.78 1.00 8.00 10.0 6.10 8.80 5.90 9.30 6.0 10.40 5.60.50 11.00 0.00 13.0 3.50 1.70 51.70 6.70 59.70 8.90 69.80 35.60 13.40 8.40 60.60 30.40 9.0 15.10 45.80 3.60 45.80 3.60 38.80 17.80 14.80 6.0 13.10 8.10 1.30 5.30 14.70 8.0 1.7 784 0.08 0.43 0.35 6 0.87 680 0.07 0.35 0.35 6 0.75 558 0.06 0.35 0.5 16 0.66 867 0.09 0.40 0.3 11 0.7 63 0.06 0.33 0.35 6 1.87 3,64 0.36 0.6 1.00 7 1. 1,8 0.1 0.87 0.57 16 1.80 4,856 0.49 1.51 0.38 9 3.8 14,151 1.4 1.8 0.79 104 4.16 18,363 1.84 1.91 0.88 16 4.36 19,337 1.93.43 1.09 61 0.79 1,149 0.11 0.56 0.6 7 3.99 17,77 1.77.05 0.90 14.46 1,758 0.18 0.81 0.83 19 4.01 4,705 0.47 1.7 1.14 8 4.96 3,384 0.34 1.08 1.07 8 3.5 4,86 0.48 0.94 1.14 13 0.97,807 0.8 0.38 0.45 13 0.68 633 0.06 0.54 0.33 7 1.01,516 0.5 0.9 0.3 9 0.84 1,837 0.18 0.54 0.35 3 1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application, assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 10] for solid manure (metric). Represents half the total phosphorus that is immediately available. The other half is available within a year of application. Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 1.30 1.35 0.95 $/kg). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. 11

Table C. Other Livestock Available Nutrients and Value for Manure from Various Livestock Types Imperial Animal Type Available Nutrients (in year of application) Aver Usable DM N 1 P 0 5 K 0 Year 1 Value 3 Value Year 4 value Total N Total Nutrient Content (as-is basis) NH 4-N P K % lb/ton $/ton % ppm % % % Bison 1.1 1.6 1.3 1.5.40 1.50 # Samples 0.40 30 0.03 0.07 0.07 7 Elk 30.5.9 3.7 5. Red deer 5.0.5 3.1 4.3 White-tailed deer 31.1 4.8 7.9 7.6 Fallow deer 9.4 3.4 6.4 7.6 Llama 34.9 3.0 6.4 5.4 Alpaca 7.1 3.0 7.4 5.0 Wild boar 9.8 4. 6.1 7.6 Chinchilla 65.7 7.0 11.4 1.6 Rabbit 45.6 5.1 16.0 1.3 Fox 35.4 15. 7.8 8. Mink average 45.8 3.4 33.5 17.1 kittens 50.0 41.5 35.1 19.0 adults 44. 43.6 44.7 3.5 composted carcasses 45.9 5.8 10.3 5.6 females & kits 41.7 39.9 37.7 19.4 Pheasants 66.3 16.3 14.9 17.9 Partridge 71.9 8.3 3.4 4.6 Quail 59.6 3.8 19.8 3.1 Squab (pigeon) 57.7 3.8 17. 4.6 Duck 39.7 8.3 7.0 9.7 Ostrich 40.8 4.6 9.9 7.1 Emu 5.9 8.3 5.3 6.9 Rhea 8.7 6.7 9.9 7.6 6.0 3.60 5.0 3.10 11.00 7.0 9.0 5.50 8.00 5.30 8.50 5.70 9.50 5.10 0.40 10.00 18.10 1.00 9.60 19.60 47.0 4.0 54.50 6.0 63.50 3.0 1.0 7.70 55.30 7.50 6.60 13.70 41.80 1.50 41.70 1.50 35.40 16.10 13.40 5.70 11.90 7.30 11.0 4.80 13.30 7.40 0.73 60 0.06 0.0 0.4 13 0.6 514 0.05 0.17 0.0 6 1.7 784 0.08 0.43 0.35 6 0.87 680 0.07 0.35 0.35 6 0.75 558 0.06 0.35 0.5 16 0.66 867 0.09 0.40 0.3 11 0.7 63 0.06 0.33 0.35 6 1.87 3,64 0.36 0.6 1.00 7 1. 1,8 0.1 0.87 0.57 16 1.80 4,856 0.49 1.51 0.38 9 3.8 14,151 1.4 1.8 0.79 104 4.16 18,363 1.84 1.91 0.88 16 4.36 19,337 1.93.43 1.09 61 0.79 1,149 0.11 0.56 0.6 7 3.99 17,77 1.77.05 0.90 14.46 1,758 0.18 0.81 0.83 19 4.01 4,705 0.47 1.7 1.14 8 4.96 3,384 0.34 1.08 1.07 8 3.5 4,86 0.48 0.94 1.14 13 0.97,807 0.8 0.38 0.45 13 0.68 633 0.06 0.54 0.33 7 1.01,516 0.5 0.9 0.3 9 0.84 1,837 0.18 0.54 0.35 3 1

1 Useable N = amount of nitrogen available in the year of application, assuming spring application incorporated within 4 hr. A simplified useable N for fall-applied manure = [(% total N x 0.5) x 0] for solid manure (imperial). Represents half the total phosphorus that is immediately available. The other half is available within a year of application. Value of manure is based on purchase price of an equivalent amount of mineral fertilizer (Oct 013). (N P 0 5 K 0 = 0.60 0.61 0.43 $/lb). The actual immediate value for crop production will be less if all the nutrients applied are not required for growing the crop. The micronutrient and organic matter values are not reflected in these tables. This infosheet was compiled by Christine Brown, Nutrient Management Field Crop Program Lead, OMAF and MRA, Woodstock 13