Work Type Definition

Similar documents
Exhibit A - Scope of Service Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger Operations Consultant

EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES SYSTEMS PLANNING OFFICE STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM (SIS) PLANNING CONSULTANT

Twin Cities Metro Freight Study Summary of Results

EXHIBIT A. TRANSIT AND MULTIMODAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT CONTINUING SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES FM No

GIS-based Modeling for Statewide and Corridor Freight Planning

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Technical Methods Part 2

INTRODUCTION... 4 DATA COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT... 6 I-1. DATA COLLECTION AND ASSESSMENT... 6 I-1.1 CTP Inventory and Assessment... 6 I-1.

Chapter 1 Introduction

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Transport Domain Plan. Draft list of Enduring Questions

September Public Meetings. Developing a Blueprint for the Corridor

Statewide Model Application Using the Texas SAM

WISCONSIN DOT PUTTING RESEARCH TO WORK

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

HIGHWAY 14 NEW ULM TO NICOLLET 4-Lane Expansion Open House

PLANES, TRAINS & SEMIS South Carolina s Statewide Freight Plan

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Request for Proposal

Twin Cities Regional Truck Corridors Study. MnDOT Metro Freight Studies Roundup

Request for Proposal (RFP 13-02)

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Modeling Applications for Freight Tennessee DOT Freight Planning

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Request for Qualifications Information. Architectural / Engineering Task Contract Design Services

Trade & Logistics: Understanding the Industry

APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS

INDEX EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FINANCIAL PROJECT NUMBER

Exhibit A Scope of Services Technology and Data Support Consultant for Emerging Transportation Systems

Exhibit A Scope of Services. Roadway Characteristics Inventory/Highway Performance Monitoring System (RCI/HPMS) Support

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES

LATTS II - Freight Investment Decision Principles

Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

GUIDELINES FOR SELECTING TRAVEL FORECASTING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES

TEXAS MEXICO TRANSPORTATION BORDER MASTER PLAN UPDATE

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Scope of Services Traffic Signal Retiming Contract FM NO Florida Department of Transportation District Four

PRACTITIONER S HANDBOOK

Minnesota District Freight Plans - Work Plan

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Strategic Plan Updates

Strategic Intermodal System

FINAL REPORT A METHODOLOGY FOR STATEWIDE INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. Christopher J. Eatough Graduate Research Assistant

EXISTING AND FUTURE FREIGHT GOODS MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

Florida Freight Supplychain Intermodal Model

Utilizing Transportation Data for Low Cost Safety Improvements

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

The Economic Return on Transportation Investments

Scope of Work. Project Approach and Understanding. Task 1: Study Initiation and Administration

Some network flow problems in urban road networks. Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis

Director of Transportation Planning

RAIL-DOT INSTITUTIONAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Chapter 2 Performance Measures

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MEMORANDUM

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

Incorporating TMS into Planning. Jianming Ma, Ph.D., P.E.

AN INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND OPERATIONS MODEL FOR MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Request for Proposal

Railroad Industry Opportunity: Railway Signal & Systems Engineer

Florida Transportation Systems Management and Operations. Strategic Plan

REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

ST. LOUIS REGIONAL FREIGHT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

National Water Resources Planning Professional Certification, Planning Community of Practice (PCoP) Version 1.0

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) The 2017 Traffic Operations Program Plan

Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Regional Mobility Authorities in Texas

HB2 Implementation Policy Guide

Chapter 1: The 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 1. Challenges & Opportunities 2 VTrans2035: The Precursor 2 The VSTP and VTrans2035 2

Delaware State Rail Plan. October 12,2011 DVRPC Freight Committee

Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015

Background Study Goals and Objectives

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

District One Freight Mobility & Trade Study and Implementation Plan Joint Charlotte & Sarasota/Manatee MPO Board Meeting January 25, 2016 Keith

Governor Baldacci s Transportation Bond Proposal

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE FOR CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS

Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

ATTACHMENT A. Detailed Study Scope. I-66 (Inside) Multi-modal Study Scope

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee

Transcription:

Work Type Definition Pages 1-3 detail the work type definition. In order to become pre-qualified for this work type, please see the Work Type Submittal Requirements on pages 4-5. I. Description Planning efforts are diverse in nature and frequently necessitate the input/assistance of firms who bring highly specialized expertise to the planning team. Planning applies multi-disciplinary approaches to the identification and analysis of transportation systems and facilities in order to: Understand current and future transportation system performance and needs, Identify alternative means to address needs/concerns and evaluate the implications of those choices, Identify recommended and/or necessary actions to achieve desired future outcomes, and Facilitate the involvement of and consensus among stakeholders and transportation partners. Planning projects are categorized by level and include the following Project Types: A. Level 1 (State-wide) projects are subject to intense scrutiny due to the highly public, visible nature of the work, and the involvement of various public entities. These projects encompass 1. Planning work with the capacity to substantially affect state-wide policy, priorities, and/or investments, including policy planning, studies, research, benefit/cost and other economic analyses, performance assessment, stakeholder involvement, etc. on issues of state-wide concern or precedent. 2. Development of methodologies, performance measures, and other defining practices, and includes ancillary activities such as training for their dissemination. 3. Planning specific to state-wide integration of modal and intermodal transportation issues and needs (freight-oriented highway, water, rail, and aeronautics; transit and other scheduled carrier passenger services; non-motorized travel and telework options). B. Level 2 (Regional and Corridor) Projects are in areas or topics for which there are multiple interests and necessitates involvement of firms in public involvement and consensus building encompass 1. Planning work that will help to identify future needs and shape future investments at the corridor, subarea, and district levels. 2. District long-range plans, location studies, sub-area studies, concept level corridor planning, scoping level environmental studies, and other work that may lead to the identification of specific projects, but that does not routinely provide advanced project detail or design. 3. Planning for defined corridor segments or subareas, including capacity studies, concept level design, benefit/cost and other economic analyses, land use and circulation plans, access management plans and related work such as official mapping. These efforts can include environmental review and limited preliminary engineering. Corridor-specific and subarea planning can include traffic operations analysis, suggestion for conceptual geometric modifications for congestion and/or safety improvement as well as planning for ITS applications for congestion, safety, security, modal, and other purposes. Integration of modal and intermodal considerations at the corridor level or subarea level is included. Rev. December 2011 Page 1 of 5

4. Extensive involvement with local government, the public, and other stakeholders and transportation partners. 5. Case studies and/or development of templates for replicable efforts. Training that improves MnDOT s and/or transportation partners Class 2 planning capabilities is included. C. Level 3 (Transportation Data and Statistics) work is commonly a necessary and integral element of Level 1 and Level 2 planning projects. It provides the analytical base for other aspects of transportation planning and for MnDOT decisions. Training that improves MnDOT s and/or transportation partners Class 3 planning capabilities is included. These projects encompass 1. Planning, research, and study that provide data, modeling, and analysis needed to address planning, design, and operational needs. 2. Operational and forecasting models; 3. Origin-destination (OD) studies; 4. Traffic counts; 5. Application of ITS data and transportation statistics including flows, mode splits, safety, facility condition, etc.; including operational and/or geometric modifications for operational improvement. 6. Work required to monitor and understand system trends and performance and to project future conditions and implications. Pre-qualification in each level of Planning is afforded in two types of Level of Service: A. Full Service means that the firm has employees with significant experience and offers full service capabilities to lead, manage, and perform the level of work for which they are pre-qualified. B. Limited Service means that the firm has limited service capacity and offers assistance for the level of work for which they are pre-qualified, either a) to other firms or directly to MnDOT, or b) by providing specialty/niche planning expertise. II. III. Standards and Specifications Standards and specifications required for a project under this work type may include A. All work completed for Level 1 and 2 projects must be consistent with applicable federal and state laws, rules, and guidance regarding transportation planning. Level 3 project work must be consistent with recognized professional standards for similar work. Provided by MnDOT Information to be supplied by MnDOT for a project under this work type may include A. Guidance and direction from project manager, and, as appropriate, a project management team, policy advisory committee, and/or technical advisory committee; commonly includes significant interaction/involvement with the public and other potentially affected stakeholders. Rev. December 2011 Page 2 of 5

IV. Provided by Consultant Deliverables to be supplied by the consultant for a project may include A. Planning outputs range from data collection and analysis, to development of plans, reports, memoranda, to the creation and conduct of interactive decision-making processes that acceptably a) define matters of study, b) identify alternatives and options to address or resolve concerns, c) identify the implications of alternative choices, and d) facilitate consensus about the nature of an issue and of selected, preferred, or recommended course(s) of action. Deliverables may include, but are not limited to, 1. Level 1 a. Statewide Transportation Plan b. Freight Flow Study c. State Aviation System Plan d. Travel Time Reliability Methodology e. Benefit-cost Analysis Protocol 2. Level 2 a. District Long Range Plan b. IRC Corridor Management Plan c. Access Management Plan d. Transit Operations Plan e. River Crossing Scoping Study f. Physical impact analyses 3. Level 3 a. Origin-Destination Study b. Safety Improvements Analysis c. Travel Demand Modeling d. Traffic Simulation Modeling e. Crash Analysis B. In some instances, MnDOT will require that planning firms be capable of acting in the role of project/team leader, and be able to provide all capabilities required for project completion, either within the firm or with subcontractors. In other instances, a planning firm s work will be under the direction of MnDOT staff or others and will provide a specific contribution to a project that is not overall under the firm s direction. It is not unusual for planning projects to require capabilities in more than one planning level. This remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Rev. December 2011 Page 3 of 5

Work Type Submittal Requirements A consultant firm becomes pre-qualified based on the qualifications of the personnel that are employed by the firm. Key Personnel Requirements Minimum Number of Staff: Full Service Firms: Three or more qualified professionals Limited Service Firms: One qualified professional For any project, the appropriate minimum will depend on the complexity of the project and the number of staff and array of planning and related disciplines needed for timely and satisfactory completion. Professional None specifically required Certification/Licensure: Work Type Submittal Requirements* I. Resume and Relevant Project Experience Form (Form PQ1) Submit in Word format A. Complete Parts 1, 1A, and 2of Form PQ1 Part 1: Fill out general information and names of personnel. Firm must specify the level(s) of planning work for which it is seeking prequalification, as well as whether it represents itself as having Full Service capabilities or Limited Service capabilities. Rev. December 2011 Page 4 of 5 Part 1A: Must demonstrate satisfactory experience for the level for which pre-qualification is sought. Experience requirements for Full Service and Limited Service Firms by level are listed below. Limited Service Firm Level 1: Minimum of 1 project within last 6 years Level 2: Minimum of 2 projects within last 4 years Level 3: Minimum of 2 projects within last 2 years Full Service Firm Level 1: Minimum of 1 project within last 6 years Level 2: Minimum of 3 projects within last 4 years Level 3: Minimum of 3 projects within last 2 years Both Limited and Full Service firms must identify and demonstrate capability to create, analyze, manipulate, and display information using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), utilize spreadsheet and database programs, and to conduct public involvement for the level(s) for which prequalification is sought. Include contact information for each project listed. In addition, Full Service Firms must demonstrate satisfactory experience in oversight of subcontractors services. Part 2: Project Examples listed must correlate to those described below in Project Example Requirements.

II. Project Example Requirements Submit in PDF format III. Proof of Professional Certification/Licensure Submit in PDF format Part 3: Not Applicable A. One project example (such as a final report) is required to be submitted for each level for which pre-qualification is applied. The project example(s) must be clear enough to allow for evaluation. If the deliverables for a project used as an example was not a final report, an example must be provided that shows the level of detail and quality that can be expected, such as spreadsheet and GIS applications. A. None specifically required. However, the firm should provide any staff certifications that may be pertinent for the aspects of planning work for which the firm seeks to be qualified. B. For non-regulated disciplines, staffs relevant academic credentials or training should be identified. *Work Type Submittal Instructions: Create a CD or flash drive that includes the following individual files or folders in this order: I. Resume and Relevant Project Experience Form (Form PQ1) II. Project Example Requirements (this should be a folder that includes individual files clearly named according to Part 2 of the PQ1) III. Proof of Professional Certification/Licensure Each file should be saved in the format identified above. Submit 5 copies of the CD or flash drive. Rev. December 2011 Page 5 of 5