Governors State University Social Work Program

Similar documents
Bachelor of Social Work I. Student Learning Plan

STUDENT: Phone Number: Placement Phone Number: UW Address: Field Hour Schedule:

Bloomsburg University Midterm and Final Competency Field Evaluation

STUDENT: Phone Number: Placement Phone Number: UW Address: Field Hour Schedule:

SW 445: Field Practicum II Field Education Learning Agreement

Potential Agencies. Sincerely, Traci Lilley, LCSW Associate Director and Director of Field Education

2015 Social Work Competencies for Generalists

BSW Learning Contract

SW 5040 FOUNDATION PRACTICUM LEARNING PLAN & EVALUATION FORM

BSW Learning Agreement

Rating Scale for Evaluation of Field Placement Performance [EPAS 2015] Name of Intern Date

Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES. LAST COMPLETED ON May 20, 2017

PRACTICE BEHAVIORS MEASURES

PROCESS RECORDING INFORMATION AND MATERIAL TEMPLATE FOR PROCESS RECORDINGS/LOGS

Social Work Program Competencies Outcome Matrix Findings for Each Measurement % of students will score higher

Form: "Activities & Target Dates - Foundation" Created with: Taskstream Author: University at Buffalo Social Work Manager

Explanation of Student Learning Plan A learning plan is required from all students in a degree program in order to ensure that specific agreedupon

Educational Contract Foundation Year (all methods) Competencies and Practice Behaviors

METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK- BSW and MSW Foundation Year LEARNING AGREEMENT. Field Placement Schedule

Department of Social Work - Field Program LEARNING AGREEMENT

Field Education Planning

Seton Hall University BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES. LAST COMPLETED ON July 2, 2015

Secondary Field Instructor: Phone This document is intended to be added to as needed when approved by the Faculty Liaison.

SW 701 Foundation Field Practicum. Learning Contract Supplement: A Guide to Completing the Learning Contract

Competencies and Practice Behaviors

Office of Field Education. Learning Contract for Foundation MSW Students

Arkansas State University Department of Social Work Competencies and Advanced Practice Behaviors

Lehman College / CUNY Department of Social Work

SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM. Field Education Manual

SAMPLE MSW GENERALIST LEARNING CONTRACT

Program Assessment. University of Cincinnati School of Social Work Master of Social Work Program. August 2013

Lehman College / CUNY Department of Social Work

BSW LEARNING AGREEMENT University of Montana School of Social Work updated 8/13

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword 3. Faculty Directory 4

CALSWEC CURRICULUM COMPETENCIES

Learning Contract & Evaluation Form for BSW Students

Field Instructor Guide

THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORK. SW 584 Advanced Field Practice CRN 50548; Section #: credit hours Fall 2017

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT MONTICELLO Department of Social Work. B.S.W. Program PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Learning Plan)

MACRO Student Evaluation

Social Work Department Field Experience Manual

Individual Learning Plan (ILP)

TABLE 1 Field Instructor Ratings of Foundation Competencies Fall 2014/Spring 2015 (N=135)

SW ADVANCED PRACTICUM LEARNING PLAN & EVALUATION FORM

Social Work Field Education Learning Plan

MOLLOY COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK PART I: PROCESS RECORDING TEMPLATE Student: Field Instructor: Date: Faculty Liaison: Setting:

(NAME) BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM. ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ( Academic Year) LAST COMPLETED ON July

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK FIELD MANUAL

ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED MSW PROGRAM COMPETENCIES 2015 %=5 %=4 =>4

Blake Beecher, MSW, PhD UH 311 Jeannine Guarino, MSW, LCSW UH 323

Organizational Leadership Suggested Field Assignments

WELCOME TO FIELD ORIENTATION FOR FIELD INSTRUCTORS AND ON-SITE SUPERVISORS

SOWK 682 DIRECT PRACTICE TRACK ADVANCED PLACEMENT FIELD EVALUATION FORM FIELD INSTRUCTORVERSION West Virginia University School of Social Work

BSW & MSW Foundation Year Practice Behaviors and Activities (400 hours)

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY (SU) BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM AND MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE COMPETENCY

99.6% 98.4% 97.0% 98.5% 98.3% 97.5% 98.2% 94.1% 95.0% 97.5% 98.7% 98.4% 95.2%

FIELD EDUCATION MANUAL Fall Spring 2018

FULL PROPOSAL: Substantive Change(s) to a Course

SWK 5423: FIELD PRACTICUM CONTRACT & STUDENT EVALUATION

BA/BASW Field Education Manual

Field Practicum Manual. Social Work Department

The field instructor is asked to evaluate the student s competency progress based on the evaluation rating scale below.

Program Commitments and Competencies

SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK BSW COMPETENCIES AND BEHAVIORS

UWM-Milwaukee The Helen Bader School of Social Welfare Department of Social Work Field Education Course Objectives Direct Practice

Baylor School of Social Work SACS Report of Progress Academic Year

Social Work Student Handbook

CUA. THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA National Catholic School of Social Service Shahan Hall Washington, DC Fax

Review of definition and concept of cultural competence and cultural humility Defining the practice of cultural humility and its application to

Introduction. Subjects and Surveys Returned for :

Social Work Program Student Handbook

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (1980, 2005, 2009)

BSW Portfolio Capstone Student Manual

School of Social Work

Student Handbook MSW Program

Social Workers PLACEMENT Registration

Campbell University School of Education Department of Social Work

III MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK (MSW) FIELD MANUAL

Capella University Master of Social Work Program Field Education Manual

Department of Social Work Field Education Manual BSW Program

BSW Field Practicum Manual

BSW Preparation for Practice Part D Learning Contract & Student Performance Evaluation

MPH Learning Plan Instructions

MSW Field Evaluation Rubric Training

Accreditation Updates and Resources. December 2016

School of Social Work

Strategic Level Professional Capabilities

Holistic Assessment using the Professional Capabilities Framework End of Placement Report

CHICAGO STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM FIELD PRACTICUM MANUAL

ESSEX COUNTY COLLEGE Social Sciences Division SOC 121 Social Service Policies and Procedures I Course Outline

The Professional Capabilities Framework and the Early Professional Development programme

PracticePerspectives. Summer. Multiculturalism: Implications for Culturally Competent Social Work Practice. Rita Webb, MSW

International Competencies for Educational and Vocational Guidance Practitioners. Competency Framework

Professional Capability Framework Social Work Level Capabilities:

Committed to Excellence through Supervision Iowa DHS Child Welfare Supervisor Curriculum

The Continuing Competence Program for Psychologists Practicing in Nova Scotia. A Guide for Participants

ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM. Practicum Manual

Professional Capability Framework - ASYE Level Capabilities:

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY. SWRK 561: Foundation Field Practicum II (Taken with SWRK 522 Practice Class) Time:

Transcription:

Instructions MSW FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT EVALUATION Spring 2018 The MSW Field Foundation Evaluation provides a summary of the student s practicum experiences. It includes an overview of the types of learning opportunities in which the student was engaged as well as the demographics of client systems that were served. Please complete the following steps: 1. Student should review their Learning Contract and evaluate their progress within the context of the planned learning goals. 2. Student should identify both areas of strength and areas for improvement. 3. Student should provide the field instructor with recommendations about meeting learning goals the next term. 4. Student and field instructor should complete the field evaluation separately and then meet to review the evaluation. Final recommendations regarding this evaluation will come from the field instructor. Please note that discussion of the items assessed in this evaluation provides an opportunity for the student and field instructor to evaluate progress and to set goals for future learning in the field. The student is responsible for communicating the date the signed evaluation form is due. It is important that these forms are submitted in a timely fashion since a delay in submission could result in an incomplete grade for the student. This fillable form can be submitted electronically via email to FEO@govst.edu However, if for some reason, there is difficulty with submission, the field instructor may give the form to the student to return to the school. [Remove Instruction Sheet upon Submission] Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 1

MSW FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT EVALUATION Spring 2018 Student s Name: Agency: Field Instructor: Field Liaison: Demographics 1. Which of the following types of clients did you serve this semester? (Check all that apply) Individuals Couples Families Groups (Facilitated or Co-facilitated) 2. To which of the following ethnic groups did the clients you served this semester belong? (Check all that apply) African/American/Black (non-hispanic) American Indian/Native American Asian American/Pacific Islander Caucasian (non-hispanic) Hispanic/Latino Other (please specify): 3. Which of the following age groups did you serve this semester? (Check all that apply) Seniors (60 +) Adults (18-59) Youth (Infants 17) 4. Which of the following client populations did you serve this semester? (Check all that apply) Developmentally disabled Physically challenged Mentally or emotionally challenged/disordered 5. Which of the following client populations did you serve this semester? (Check all that apply) Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 2

Heterosexual Homosexual Bisexual Transgendered Other (please specify): Evaluation Rating Scale The student is to be evaluated according to competency-based criteria in accordance with the CSWE standards listed on the learning contract. Each competency is evaluated based on a five point rating scale. Each rating descriptor of student performance is to be evaluated based on: Consistency of performance Quality of work Appropriate level of independence Time needed to accomplish tasks Indication of steady progress Integration of knowledge, value and skills Ability to transfer learning from one activity to the next To be most effective, students and field instructors should both review and rate the student s progress separately then discuss their answers together before the field instructor completes the final evaluation. This allows the student(s) to be reflective of their own progress as well as receive instructional feedback from their field supervisor. By the completion of the field placement students are expected to achieve an overall minimum rating of competence in all nine competencies. Clear evidence of the students demonstrated competency should be provided to support all ratings. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 3

Evaluation Criteria grading rubric* The drop down menu will provide you with a number. Please select the number that corresponds with the description next to it. 5 Advanced Competency Student consistently demonstrates, integrates and applies values, knowledge and skills in all activities independently and expertly. Student should use consultation appropriately; perform activities in a timely and efficient manner with sufficient quality; perform with cultural humility and competency and demonstrate an ability to teach others. 4 Competency Student usually demonstrates and integrates values, knowledge and skills with sufficient mastery and independence; uses supervision for consultation appropriately, appropriately applies learning from one activity to another; uses time well to accomplish tasks and assignments; ready to move to advanced placement or beginning practitioner level. 3 Emerging Competency Student is beginning to demonstrate knowledge/skills; beginning to integrate and apply learning from one activity to the next; requires regular direction and instruction; progress is evident; learning is becoming more efficient; and quality of work is uneven at times but moving in a positive direction. 2 Pre Competency Student does not consistently demonstrate an integration of values, knowledge and skills; needs constant supervision; quality of work is uneven; tasks are not completed in a timely fashion; knowledge/skills are not transferred from one assignment to the next; and progress is uncertain. 1 Incompetency Student does not demonstrate basic foundational knowledge of social work skills, ethics, or values in the practice setting. Student is unable to utilize critical feedback from field supervision to improve and develop skills. Student is unable to perform at expected level (even when given clear directions and guidance) and requires excessive oversight and supervision. Student clearly violates NASW professional ethics, does not exercise professional boundaries or fails to follow agency policies. 9 N/A No opportunities for assessment This rating requires examples be provided to show evidence of gross and incompetent practice behaviors. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 4

MSW Foundation students are expected to develop competencies as evidenced by practice behaviors associated with the 9 competencies. MSW Foundation students should consistently practice skills related to social work practice, values/ethics and professionalism. MSW students should learn skills related to interviewing, intake and assessment, contracting for services with the client, agency documentation, and other services deemed beginning level at the field site. MSW students must also learn the NASW Code of Ethics and discuss them in supervision. Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior Social workers understand the value base of the profession and its ethical standards, as well as relevant laws and regulations that may impact practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. Social workers understand frameworks of ethical decision-making and how to apply principles of critical thinking to those frameworks in practice, research, and policy arenas. Social workers recognize personal values and the distinction between personal and professional values. (CSWE, 2015). Practice Behavior (PB) 1. Make ethical decisions by applying the standards of the NASW Code of Ethics, relevant laws and regulations, models for ethical decision-making, ethical conduct of research, and additional codes of ethics as appropriate to context. F.I. PB 2. Use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations. F.I. PB3. Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior; appearance; and oral, written, and electronic communication. F.I. PB 4. Use technology ethically and appropriately to facilitate practice outcomes. F.I. PB 5. Use supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behavior. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 5

Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice Social workers understand how diversity and difference characterize and shape the human experience and are critical to the formation of identity. The dimensions of diversity are understood as the intersectionality of multiple factors including but not limited to age, class, color, culture, disability and ability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity and expression, immigration status, marital status, political ideology, race, religion/spirituality, sex, sexual orientation, and tribal sovereign status. (CSWE, 2015) PB1. Apply and communicate understanding of the importance of diversity and difference in shaping life experiences in practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. F.I. PB 2. Present themselves as learners and engage clients and constituencies as experts of their own experiences. F.I. PB3. Apply self-awareness and self-regulation to manage the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse clients and constituencies. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 6

Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice Social workers understand that every person regardless of position in society has fundamental human rights such as freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and education. Social workers understand the global interconnections of oppression and human rights violations, and are knowledgeable about theories of human need and social justice and strategies to promote social and economic justice and human rights. (CSWE, 2015). PB1: Apply their understanding of social, economic, and environmental justice to advocate for human rights at the individual and system levels. F.I. PB 2: Engage in practices that advance social, economic, and environmental justice. F.I. Competency 4: Engage In Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice Social workers understand quantitative and qualitative research methods and their respective roles in advancing a science of social work and in evaluating their Social workers know the principles of logic, scientific inquiry, and culturally informed and ethical approaches to building knowledge. Social workers understand that evidence that informs practice derives from multi-disciplinary sources and multiple ways of knowing. (CSWE, 2015) PB 1: Use practice experience and theory to inform scientific inquiry and research. F.I. PB 2: Apply critical thinking to engage in analysis of quantitative and qualitative research methods and research findings. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 7

PB3: Use and translate research evidence to inform and improve practice, policy, and service delivery. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 8

Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice Social workers understand that human rights and social justice, as well as social welfare and services, are mediated by policy and its implementation at the federal, state, and local levels. Social workers understand the history and current structures of social policies and services, the role of policy in service delivery, and the role of practice in policy development. (CSWE, 2015). PB 1: Identify social policy at the local, state, and federal level that impact well-being, service delivery, and access to social services. F.I. PB 2: Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social services. F.I. PB 3: Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, economic. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 9

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Social workers understand that engagement is an ongoing component of the dynamic and interactive process of social work practice with, and on behalf of, diverse individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. (CSWE, 2015) PB 1: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-inenvironment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 2: Use empathy, reflection, and interpersonal skills to effectively engage diverse clients and constituencies. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 10

Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Social workers understand that assessment is an ongoing component of the dynamic and interactive process of social work practice with, and on behalf of, diverse individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Social workers understand theories of human behavior and the social environment, and critically evaluate and apply this knowledge in the assessment of diverse clients and constituencies, including individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. (CSWE, 2015). PB 1: Collect and organize data, and apply critical thinking to interpret information from clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 2: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the analysis of assessment data from clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 3: Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives based on the critical assessment of strengths, needs, and challenges within clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 4: Select appropriate intervention strategies based on the assessment, research knowledge, and values and preferences of clients and constituencies. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 11

Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Social workers understand that intervention is an ongoing component of the dynamic and interactive process of social work practice with, and on behalf of, diverse individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Social workers are knowledgeable about evidence-informed interventions to achieve the goals of clients and constituencies, including individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. (CSWE, 2015). PB 1: Critically choose and implement interventions to achieve practice goals and enhance capacities of clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 2: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-inenvironment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in interventions with clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 3: Use inter-professional collaboration as appropriate to achieve beneficial practice outcomes. F.I. PB 4: Negotiate, mediate, and advocate with and on behalf of diverse clients and constituencies. F.I. PB 5: Facilitate effective transitions and endings that advance mutually agreed-on goals. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 12

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities Social workers understand that evaluation is an ongoing component of the dynamic and interactive process of social work practice with, and on behalf of, diverse individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities. Social workers recognize the importance of evaluating processes and outcomes to advance practice, policy, and service delivery effectiveness. PB 1: Select and use appropriate methods for evaluation of outcomes. F.I. PB 2: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-inenvironment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks in the evaluation of outcomes. F.I. PB 3: Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate intervention and program processes and outcomes. F.I. PB 4: Apply evaluation findings to improve practice effectiveness at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. F.I. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 13

Summary Statement Field Supervisor Please comment on the overall performance of the student in this practicum setting including strengths, major areas of improvement, responsiveness to supervision, recommendations for further growth, and areas of concern. Summary Statement Student Please comment on your overall performance in this practicum setting including strengths, major areas of improvement, responsiveness to supervision, recommendations for further growth, and areas of concern. Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 14

Recommended grade: Generally, an overall average score of less than three for all items (except N/O items) will result in a no credit grade. However, the GSU field liaison will discuss with the field instructor any extenuating circumstances that should be considered before assigning such a grade for the course. Pass No credit To be completed by student: I am in agreement with the evaluation that I have reviewed with my field instructor. I have reviewed the evaluation with my field instructor and choose to attach a written response. Signature of student Date Signature of agency field instructor Date Signature of GSU field liaison Date Adapted from Boston University School of Social Work Rating Categories Rev. 08-2017 (pb) 15