The Regulation of GM crops in the United States

Similar documents
Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology in the United States: Overview

USDA-APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services Janet L. Bucknall Associate Deputy Administrator

FDA Regulation of Food from GE Crops

Regulation of New Plant Breeding Techniques in Canada and the United States

Unapproved Genetically Modified Wheat Discovered in Oregon: Status and Implications

USDA Regulation of Organisms Developed Through Modern Breeding Technologies

New breeding technologies in plant sciences

Unapproved Genetically Modified Wheat Discovered in Oregon and Montana: Status and Implications

GMO Crops, Trade Wars, and a New Site Specific Mutagensis System. A. Lawrence Christy, Ph.D.

Ensuring Food and Feed Safety: US Food Law and FDA s Biotechnology Consultation Process

Agricultural Biotechnology: Background and Recent Issues

Regulations and safety assessment for genetically modified foods and feeds in Taiwan

GET TO KNOW GMOS A RESOURCE FOR YOU

Greening-Resistant Genetically- Enhanced Trees: A case study. Michael S. Irey

This Pocket K documents some of the GM crop experiences of selected developing countries.

Genetically Modified Foods: Are They Safe?

Pocket K No. 2. Plant Products of Biotechnology

Agricultural Biotechnology: California and Beyond. Peggy G. Lemaux University of California

IS THE US FDA REGULATION AND EVALUATION OF GENETICALLY ENGINEEERED FOODS SUFFICIENT? Teresa Marek FOOD REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Name: Period: Date: 2) The procedures are often referred to as. 3) is the genetic material of all living organisms.

benefits of bt cotton in burkina faso

GMOs: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction

DELIVERING A SYSTEM FOR HIGHER YIELD IN CANOLA

Chapter 6: Plant Biotechnology

Post-Market Oversight of Biotech Foods

What if Biotechnology is the only answer to HLB? June 16, 2016

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

Wisconsin Briefs. from the Legislative Reference Bureau GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS. Brief December 2012

Genetically Modified Organisms II. How are transgenic plants generated? The components of T DNA transfer. Plants

Genetic Engineering 1

June 19, Regulatory Analysis and Development PPD, APHIS, Station 3A River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD

Peaceful Coexistence in the Alfalfa World

In a decision that has outraged organic and conventional alfalfa

GMO Answers: Get to Know GMOs

Product Safety Assessment Herculex RW Rootworm Protection

Testimony of the Biotechnology Industry Organization. Submitted to the California Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND REGULATING PESTICIDE BIOTECHNOLOGY AT THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Global impact of Biotech crops: economic & environmental effects

GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts

GMO CONTAMINATION PREVENTION

GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS AND BIOSAFETY** Prof S.Kannaiyan*

Pocket K No. 42. Stacked Traits in Biotech Crops

Biosafety Issues and Bt cotton A case study. O. P. GOVILA Retd. Professor Genetics IARI

Is Transgenic Sugarcane a BMP? William Lee Burnquist

WHOLE FOODS MARKET GMO Labeling Policy

[ 2 ] [ 3 ] WHAT IS BIOTECHNOLOGY? HOW IS BIOTECHNOLOGY DIFFERENT FROM THE TRADITIONAL WAY OF IMPROVING CROPS?

! Modern technology allows for the insertion of desirable genes into target organism genomes (recombinant DNA)

impact the first nine years

Molecular assessment of GMOs Ilona Kryspin Sørensen PhD DTU Food Division for Risk Assessment and Nutrition

Office of Pest Management Policy (OPMP)

Regulatory experiences and ideas. Steve Strauss Oregon State University

Biotech, What the Heck? A Quick Lesson on GMOS. Katie Aikins Assistant Director of Education Arizona Farm Bureau

Genetically Engineered Fruit Crops: Assessing the Risks and Realizing the Opportunities

Bt d-endotoxins are globular protein molecules, which accumulate as protoxins in crystalline form during late stage of the sporulation.

Genetically modified sugarcane and Eldana. Sandy Snyman Agronomist s Association Annual Symposium 27 October 2015

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Ministry of Agriculture BRIEFING NOTE FOR MINISTER FOR INFORMATION

ISSUES WITH GMO ALFALFA IN THE MARKETPLACE. William T. W. Woodward 1

What is Biotechnology?

GMOs are NOT: GMOs are: Plants that were improved through artificial selection processes like cross breeding, hybridization, or mutagenesis.

Evolution of GM crop development from the 1990s to today; Future challenges: Pipeline products; Next generation GMOs and impacts on seed testing

Beyond Promises: Facts about Biotech/GM Crops in 2016

Food & Agricultural Biotechnology CPE Questions

Potential impact of crop diversification and biotechnological inventions on the use of micronutrients

Transgenic Plants Model Answers

2016 Annual Meat Conference February 21-23, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee

Herbicide Tolerance & Insect Resistance

PROS AND CONS OF GMO FOODS

Biopesticides in the United States

NBIAP NEWS REPORT January 1995

GMOs: the Myths, Concerns, propaganda and drivers of GMOs. into Nigeria

660 Pennsylvania Ave., S.E., Suite 302 Washington, D. C Prepared by Anne Hillson June 2007

Could benefit organic: High use in Hawaii has lowered virus levels to allow organic production. Herd immunity

What are Genetically Modified Crops and how are they made? Professor Idah Sithole-Niang Department of Biochemistry, UZ GMASSURE - UZ

A Conversation about GMO Labeling Philip Miller PhD

COTTON PRODUCT USE GUIDE

What is Genetic Engineering?

(Gives background and presents arguments for both sides) by P. Byrne, D. Pendell, & G. Graff* Quick Facts...

The Need for Coexistence with GMO Alfalfa. Dan Putnam. Department of Plant Sciences University of California-Davis

Food Safety and. Genetically Modified Foods

CHAPTER 9: GENETIC ENGINEERING DR. BERTOLOTTI

2020 Outlook: The GM crops global pipeline and New Plant Breeding Techniques

Biotechnology. Chapter 17 section 1 (only)

Genetically Modified Crops: Past, Present and Future

The Role of Biotechnology to Enhance Agricultural Productivity, Production and Farmer Incomes.

STUDY GUIDE ARE GMOS GOOD OR BAD? KEY TERMS: genes DNA genetically-modified

Chapter 5. The Carriage of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops

Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science. Genetically Modified Organisms and TSCA

Canadian Perspectives on the "Novelty" Trigger for Environmental Release of PNTs. Heather Shearer CFIA Plant Biosafety Office

World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology May, 2014

Genomics. Genomics. Understanding the human genome. The human genome. Genomics = study of an organism s entire genome or entire DNA sequence

August Green Biotechnology Peter Oakley Member of the Board of Executive Directors

Pocket K No. 16. Biotech Crop Highlights in 2016

Developments in Plant Sciences Learning Objectives

Cost Benefit Analysis LSA Document #17-180

Student s Guide. minipcr TM GMO Learning Lab: Heart-Shaped Bananas

Chapter 7 Agricultural Biotechnology

HUNGER AND ENVIRONMENTAL NUTRITION DPG

Transcription:

The Regulation of GM crops in the United States GMO Technology Conference: The Regulation and Use of GMO Technology in Ireland 10-11 October 2013 // The Printworks, Dublin Castle

Coordinated Framework (1986) Federal role in the safe use of biotechnology: The safety risks of GE organisms are not fundamentally different from safety risks posed by non-ge organisms with similar traits. The existing laws provide adequate authority. Regulation should be science-based and conducted on a case-by-case basis.

Regulation Under the Coordinated Framework USDA Safe for agriculture and the environment FDA Safe for use in food and feed EPA Safe for use as pesticide 3

Regulation under the Coordinated Framework Department of Agriculture (USDA-APHIS-BRS) PPA: Protecting against damage from plant pests and noxious weeds Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FIFRA: Regulating the safe use of pesticides FFDCA: Setting allowable levels of pesticides in food Food and Drug Administration (FDA) FFDCA: Regulating safety of food, drugs, and cosmetics

FDA s 1992 Policy Statement New varieties must be as safe as conventional food. FDA established voluntary consultation procedures to help ensure that new products are safe and lawful. The safety assessment is multi-disciplinary: Agronomic and quality characteristics; genetic, chemical, nutritional analyses The consultation process is working well.

EPA regulation under FIFRA Plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) Pesticidal substance produced by plants and the genetic material necessary to produce it Example, Bt Cry insecticidal proteins in corn It also includes any inert ingredient contained in the plant. Example, marker gene Exempted from registration: PIPs that occur naturally in the plant and are moved through conventional breeding

What Does APHIS-BRS Regulate? Regulated articles (7 CFR part 340) If the organism has been altered or produced through genetic engineering, and If there is a possibility that the GE organism could be a plant pest Donor, recipient, or vector organism is a plant pest Plant pest is defined by statute Is my GE organism a regulated article? www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/am_i_reg.shtml

Introduction of Regulated Articles APHIS-BRS regulates the following activities for regulated articles: Importation Interstate movement Release into the environment (e.g. field test) Permit or notification procedures are used to authorize

Compliance Assistance Biotechnology Quality Management System (BQMS) Voluntary compliance assistance by BRS Office of Compliance Assistance Provides participants with the tools and guidance needed to develop a BQMS that is tailored to their organization s culture and needs Participants include public and private sector organizations (19 organizations as of Sept. 2013)

Petition Procedure for Nonregulated Status under 7 CFR part 340 Regulated Nonregulated

Petition Procedure for Nonregulated Status under 7 CFR part 340 Anyone can petition APHIS-BRS to determine nonregulated status (the GE organism would no longer subject to this regulation) Petition information should support conclusion that the GE organism is not a plant pest Public reviews petition and APHIS evaluation before final APHIS determination Public comments are online

Petition Procedure for Nonregulated Status under 7 CFR part 340 APHIS-BRS does two evaluations: 1. Plant pest risk assessment to decide if the GE organism is a plant pest (Plant Protection Act) 2. Environmental Assessment to evaluate the significance of any environmental impacts arising from the APHIS-BRS decision (National Environmental Policy Act; NEPA)

GE Plants with Nonregulated Status under 7 CFR part 340 APHIS-BRS has made determinations of nonregulated status in response to over 100 petitions, representing 16 plant species. The determination of nonregulated status extends to the GE plant and its offspring. Actual commercialization of GE plants with nonregulated status is determined by market demand, not the APHIS decision.

GE Plants with Nonregulated Status under 7 CFR part 340 Corn HT, IR, AP Soybean HT, IR, PQ Cotton HT, IR Canola HT, AP, PQ Squash VR Papaya VR Tobacco PQ Alfalfa HT Sugar beet - HT HT = herbicide tolerance VR = virus resistance PQ = product quality Tomato PQ Radicchio AP Potato IR, VR Rice HT Flax - AP Plum VR Rose - PQ IR = insect resistance AP = agronomic properties

Plant Variety Development LABORATORY / GREENHOUSE APHIS-BRS FIELD TESTING APHIS-BRS EPA COMMERCIALIZATION APHIS-BRS FDA EPA

Regulation Under the Coordinated Framework New Trait/Crop Agency Review Insect resistance in food crop (Bt corn) Herbicide tolerance in food crop (glyphosate tolerant soybeans) Herbicide tolerance in ornamental crop (glufosinate tolerant tulips) Modified oil in food crop (high oleic acid soybeans) Modified flower color (blue poinsettias) USDA EPA FDA USDA EPA FDA USDA EPA USDA FDA USDA Agricultural and environmental safety Environmental, food/feed safety of pesticide Food/feed safety Agricultural and environmental safety New herbicide use Food/feed safety Agricultural and environmental safety New herbicide use Agricultural and environmental safety Food/feed safety Agricultural and environmental safety

Communication with the public Communication USDA FDA EPA Extensive website information Guidance to regulated public online Regulatory decision documents online Public information during reviews Applications announced publicly Public Scientific Advisory Panels Stakeholder news updates Annual stakeholder public meeting

The Future Considering Federal regulatory approaches Existing and newer technologies White House Holdren memo on policy, March 2011 Objective: Protect safety, health, and the environment while avoiding unjustifiably inhibiting innovation, stigmatizing new technologies, or creating trade barriers

Guiding Principles for Regulating New Technologies Benefits of regulation should justify costs Promote innovation while advancing protection goals (health, environment, safety) If no significant issues identified, consider not regulating Develop performance based regulatory approaches that are predictable and flexible in the face of fresh evidence

Guiding Principles for Regulating New Technologies Scientific integrity Public participation Communication Flexibility Risk assessment and risk management Coordination International cooperation

FDA Internet Resources: www.fda.gov All things FDA www.fda.gov/geplantfoods Biotechnology consultation program www.fda.gov/bioconinventory Inventory of completed consultations 21

EPA Internet resources: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/index.htm Plant-Incorporated Protectants http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/pip_list.htm Current & Previously Registered PIP Registrations 22

USDA-APHIS-BRS Internet resources: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/brs_main.shtml BRS main page http://www.isb.vt.edu/search-release-data.aspx Searchable database of field tests http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/petitions_table_pend ing.shtml Petitions for nonregulated status 23