FDA Regulation of Food from GE Crops

Similar documents
Ensuring Food and Feed Safety: US Food Law and FDA s Biotechnology Consultation Process

The Regulation of GM crops in the United States

Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology in the United States: Overview

USDA-APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services Janet L. Bucknall Associate Deputy Administrator

Welcome to. Genetic Improvements Techniques and a Future in Small Farms

Biotech, What the Heck? A Quick Lesson on GMOS. Katie Aikins Assistant Director of Education Arizona Farm Bureau

GET TO KNOW GMOS A RESOURCE FOR YOU

Regulation of New Plant Breeding Techniques in Canada and the United States

Pocket K No. 2. Plant Products of Biotechnology

Genetically Modified Foods: Are They Safe?

Unapproved Genetically Modified Wheat Discovered in Oregon: Status and Implications

GMO Crops, Trade Wars, and a New Site Specific Mutagensis System. A. Lawrence Christy, Ph.D.

STUDY GUIDE ARE GMOS GOOD OR BAD? KEY TERMS: genes DNA genetically-modified

IS THE US FDA REGULATION AND EVALUATION OF GENETICALLY ENGINEEERED FOODS SUFFICIENT? Teresa Marek FOOD REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Genetically Modified Organisms II. How are transgenic plants generated? The components of T DNA transfer. Plants

Name: Period: Date: 2) The procedures are often referred to as. 3) is the genetic material of all living organisms.

Food & Agricultural Biotechnology CPE Questions

August Green Biotechnology Peter Oakley Member of the Board of Executive Directors

Chapter 6: Plant Biotechnology

GMOs: Distinguishing Fact from Fiction

Food Irradiation: FDA s Perspective Teresa Croce, Ph.D.

Regulations and safety assessment for genetically modified foods and feeds in Taiwan

Ministry of Agriculture BRIEFING NOTE FOR MINISTER FOR INFORMATION

Could benefit organic: High use in Hawaii has lowered virus levels to allow organic production. Herd immunity

OECD and Substantial Equivalence Peter Kearns, OECD

Genetically modified pasture dairy s opportunity? Paula Fitzgerald

Molecular assessment of GMOs Ilona Kryspin Sørensen PhD DTU Food Division for Risk Assessment and Nutrition

Wisconsin Briefs. from the Legislative Reference Bureau GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS. Brief December 2012

Beyond Promises: Facts about Biotech/GM Crops in 2016

[ 2 ] [ 3 ] WHAT IS BIOTECHNOLOGY? HOW IS BIOTECHNOLOGY DIFFERENT FROM THE TRADITIONAL WAY OF IMPROVING CROPS?

Pocket. Substantial Equivalence of GM and Non-GM Crops

benefits of bt cotton in burkina faso

What is Biotechnology?

! Modern technology allows for the insertion of desirable genes into target organism genomes (recombinant DNA)

Biotechnology. Chapter 17 section 1 (only)

Genetically Modified Crops: Past, Present and Future

CHAPTER 9: GENETIC ENGINEERING DR. BERTOLOTTI

Unapproved Genetically Modified Wheat Discovered in Oregon and Montana: Status and Implications

Pocket K No. 16. Biotech Crop Highlights in 2016

Is Transgenic Sugarcane a BMP? William Lee Burnquist

Food Safety and Quality: Assessing the Impact of Biotechnology

Agricultural Biotechnology: California and Beyond. Peggy G. Lemaux University of California

GMO Answers: Get to Know GMOs

This Pocket K documents some of the GM crop experiences of selected developing countries.

GM Foods: Safety and Regulation

Biosafety Issues and Bt cotton A case study. O. P. GOVILA Retd. Professor Genetics IARI

Regulatory experiences and ideas. Steve Strauss Oregon State University

PREPUBLICATION CODEX PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES ON FOODS DERIVED FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY CONTENTS

GMOs are NOT: GMOs are: Plants that were improved through artificial selection processes like cross breeding, hybridization, or mutagenesis.

(Gives background and presents arguments for both sides) by P. Byrne, D. Pendell, & G. Graff* Quick Facts...

Foods derived from modern biotechnology

GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS AND BIOSAFETY** Prof S.Kannaiyan*

Potential impact of crop diversification and biotechnological inventions on the use of micronutrients

Transgenic Plants Model Answers

A Conversation about GMO Labeling Philip Miller PhD

BIO1PS 2012 Plant Science Topic 4 Lectures 2 and 3 Introduction to Plant Biotechnology

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

2016 Annual Meat Conference February 21-23, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee

CROP PRODUCTION AND BIOTECHNOLOGY: Successes and Challenges SUMMARY

Genomics. Genomics. Understanding the human genome. The human genome. Genomics = study of an organism s entire genome or entire DNA sequence

World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology May, 2014

WHOLE FOODS MARKET GMO Labeling Policy

GMOs: the Myths, Concerns, propaganda and drivers of GMOs. into Nigeria

Greening-Resistant Genetically- Enhanced Trees: A case study. Michael S. Irey

Food Biotechnology: Agustin K Wardani

VARIETY JEREMY SEIFERT A FILM BY COMPELLER PIC T UR ES FOOD & WATER WATCH

Peaceful Coexistence in the Alfalfa World

USDA Regulation of Organisms Developed Through Modern Breeding Technologies

Chapter 5. Genetically Modified Foods are Not Fearful

Ecological Aspects of Genetically Modified Crops

What if Biotechnology is the only answer to HLB? June 16, 2016

Camelina a Potential New Oilseed for Washington, Idaho, and Oregon

1 Introduction 2 BASF Crop Protection 3 BASF Plant Biotechnology Dr. Peter Eckes President, BASF Plant Science

ISSUES WITH GMO ALFALFA IN THE MARKETPLACE. William T. W. Woodward 1

What are Genetically Modified Crops and how are they made? Professor Idah Sithole-Niang Department of Biochemistry, UZ GMASSURE - UZ

Who Am I? Farmer, Dietitian, Promoter of Food & Farming

Certified Non-GMO by AGW

Marketing Strategies of Biotechnology Firms: Implications for U.S. Agriculture

Food Tech: New Tech. What You Need to Know! FOOD IRRADIATION

Post-Market Oversight of Biotech Foods

Biotechnology Lesson Plan. Plant and animal genetic engineering.

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

Biotech and Society Interface: Concerns and Expectations

DELIVERING A SYSTEM FOR HIGHER YIELD IN CANOLA

PCR Methods and Analytical Strategies for GMO Testing. E. Pearce Smith Eurofins GeneScan

Testimony of the Biotechnology Industry Organization. Submitted to the California Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

Genetically Modified Organisms in Food

Trade wreck? When ag policy meets reality. Jack A. Bobo Senior Advisor for Biotechnology U.S. Department of State

GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD

THE CALIFORNIA RIGHT TO KNOW GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOOD ACT

Chapter 7 Agricultural Biotechnology

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Biosafety Regulation in Kenya

Introduction- Project Background

Food Safety and. Genetically Modified Foods

Risk assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

Regulatory Process Continues Churning, Commercialization Not in Sight

NewLeaf Potatoes: Friend or Foe A study of the GMO potato. By Rick Swenson English 320 Final Paper Dr. Sullivan 5/6/04

Bioinformatics, in general, deals with the following important biological data:

Transcription:

FDA Regulation of Food from GE Crops Patrick Cournoyer, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Food Additive Safety

Overview Historical perspective: FDA s involvement in plant breeding and plant biotechnology FDA s regulatory approach: Legal authority related to food from GE plants How to consult with us: The types of data and information FDA evaluates Past consultations 2

Regulating plant breeding: A historical perspective 1938: The Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act 1958: Food Additive Amendment Food additives require approval Exempted: Substances whose uses are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) 1970: Regulation on plant breeding and GRAS Emerging concerns cited: Glycoalkaloids in potatoes Endogenous defensive compounds Key vitamins and nutrients 3

Regulating plant breeding: A historical perspective 4

Regulating plant breeding: A historical perspective 1986 Coordinated Framework USDA EPA FDA Existing legal authorities sufficient Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Including sufficient levels of key nutrients (1970) Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Including substances added through biotechnology (1984) 5

Regulating plant breeding: A historical perspective FDA s 1992 Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties FDA views on plant breeding in general Discussed new methods of biotechnology Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) Recommended consultation Flow charts to help developers determine if important safety and regulatory concerns exist 6

Overview Historical perspective: FDA s involvement in plant breeding and plant biotechnology FDA s regulatory approach: Legal authority related to food from GE plants How to consult with us: Data and information FDA evaluates Past consultations 7

Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) Core Provisions Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval 8

Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) Core Provisions Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts 9

What does GRAS mean? GRAS: generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958, through either scientific procedures or experience based on common use in food) to be safe under the conditions of its intended use. (FD&C Act, Section 201(s)) 10

What does safe mean? With respect to added substances: Safe or safety means that there is a reasonable certainty in the minds of competent scientists that the substance is not harmful under the intended conditions of use. (Code of Federal Regulations 170.3(i)) 11

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts 12

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Above 200 milligrams total glycoalkaloid per kilogram of potato Below 200 milligrams total glycoalkaloid per kilogram of potato 13

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts 14

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts Glyphosate tolerant corn with added CP4 EPSPS protein CP4 EPSPS 15

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts 16

The FD&C Act applies to food from GE crops Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) GE Soybean with increased levels of oleic acid 80% Oleic acid content in oil 60% Common or Usual Name 40% 75% 72% Must disclose material facts 20% 0% 25% New name: High oleic soybean oil 17

Overview Historical perspective: FDA s involvement in plant breeding and plant biotechnology FDA s regulatory approach: Legal authority related to food from GE plants How to consult with us: Data and information FDA evaluates Past consultations 18

Consulting with FDA Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) FD&C Act Safety Food must be safe (adulteration) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Legal without premarket approval If safety info is publically available and widely accepted by experts (GRAS) Premarket review required If safety info is NOT publically available or NOT widely accepted by experts 19

Consulting with FDA Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Consultation with FDA to resolve safety and regulatory questions before marketing 20

Consulting with FDA Developer submits safety and regulatory assessment FDA team of experts evaluates the data and information FDA requests additional information as needed Repeat until safety and regulatory questions are resolved FDA summarizes evaluation in a memo FDA ends the consultation by sending a letter to the developer 21

Consulting with FDA Developer submits safety and regulatory assessment FDA team of experts evaluates the data and information FDA requests additional information as needed Repeat until safety and regulatory questions are resolved FDA summarizes evaluation in a memo FDA ends the consultation by sending a letter to the developer Before sending us a submission for a final consultation Consult with us early! Consult with us often! Meet with us in person or by teleconference No cost 22

Elements of a Submission Basic Information Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Trait description Crop uses Molecular characterization Trait stability Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) 2 3 23

Elements of a Submission Basic Information Trait description Crop uses Molecular characterization Trait stability Characterize insertion(s), copy number Vector Backbone? New proteins from alternative open reading frames? Stability? 2 4 24

Elements of a Submission Basic Information Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Compositional assessment: Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) 2 5 25

Compositional Analysis Good stuff Bad stuff Key Nutrients Anti-Nutrients Endogenous Toxicants Endogenous Allergens proximates lectins glycoalkaloids soybean fatty acids raffinose stachyose gossypol wheat amino acids phytic acid glucosinolates rice minerals protease inhibitors benzyl isothiocyanate? vitamins cyanogenic glycosides isoflavones*??? 26

Compositional Analysis New GE variety Appropriate comparator (Grown concurrently) To characterize changes Reference varieties (Grown concurrently) To characterize existing variation Published data To characterize existing variation 27

Field trial design Compositional Analysis Number of locations, years? Need to represent range of conditions Number of replicates? Need to control for variables Need statistical power Field trials should be designed to answer necessary regulatory questions Case by case 28

Elements of a Submission Basic Information Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Proteins: Toxicity, allergenicity Metabolites Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) 2 9 29

Evaluating new substances for safety What is it? Prior knowledge What happens after consumption? (ADME) What do we know about potential toxicity? How much is safe to consume? Are feeding studies needed? NOAEL How much is consumed? Calculating exposure Are expected exposure levels safe? Margin of exposure 30

Elements of a Submission Basic Information Endogenous Substances Must not contain substances at levels that are harmful Added Substances Ingredients must meet safety criteria, may require FDA review and approval Labeling Labeling must be truthful and not misleading (misbranding) Common or usual name Material differences? 3 1 31

New Protein Consultations Potential unintended presence in food FDA issued guidance in 2006 to establish mechanism for FDA to evaluate new proteins before field testing 32

Overview Historical perspective: FDA s involvement in plant breeding and plant biotechnology FDA s regulatory approach: Legal authority related to food from GE plants How to consult with us: Data and information FDA evaluates Past consultations 33

Completed New Protein Consultations 34

Completed Consultations www.fda.gov/bioconinventory 35

Completed Consultations Crops (# of events) Radicchio (3) Alfalfa (3) Sugar beet (3) Tomato (7) Canola (18) Other* (14) Corn (45) Soybean (19) Cotton (25) Potato (35) Herbicide tolerance (52) * Squash (2), cantaloupe (2), apple (2), rice (2), papaya (2), plum (1), flax (1), wheat (1), creeping bentgrass (1) 36

Completed Consultations Traits (# of events) Disease resistance (R protein)* (1) Insect resistance (RNAi)* (1) Drought tolerance (1) Increased yield (2) Processing enzymes (5) Lower acrylamide potential (7) Altered composition (8) Delayed ripening (8) Reduced browning (9) Insect resistance Insect (Bt)* (71) resistance (Bt)* (71) Male sterility (13) Herbicide tolerance Herbicide tolerance (52) (52) Virus resistance (RNAi)* (19) * Plant-incorporated protectants regulated by EPA 37

Thank You FDA Home Page www.fda.gov FDA s Plant Biotechnology Consultation Program www.fda.gov/geplantfoods Food from GE Plants How FDA regulates Food from GE Plants Q&As Links to guidance and policy documents Listing of all completed consultations www.fda.gov/bioconinventory Documents from completed consultations Contact Patrick.Cournoyer@fda.hhs.gov Robert.Merker@fda.hhs.gov (Biotech program lead) Carrie.McMahon@fda.hhs.gov (New Protein Consultation Program lead) 38